BETA


2010/0108(NLE) EU/Georgia Agreement: readmission of persons residing without authorisation

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead LIBE GRIESBECK Nathalie (icon: ALDE ALDE) MACOVEI Monica (icon: PPE PPE)
Committee Opinion AFET LISEK Krzysztof (icon: PPE PPE) Jaromír KOHLÍČEK (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), Ulrike LUNACEK (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), Norica NICOLAI (icon: ALDE ALDE), Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK (icon: ECR ECR)
Lead committee dossier:

Events

2011/02/25
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to conclude an agreement between the EU and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation.

NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Council Decision 2011/118/EU on the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation.

BACKGROUND: in accordance with Council Decision 2010/687/EU the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation was signed, on behalf of the EU, on 17 June 2010, subject to its conclusion at a later date. The Agreement should now be approved.

Furthermore, the Agreement establishes a Joint Readmission Committee which may adopt its rules of procedure, and there is provision for a simplified procedure for the establishment of the Union position in this case.

CONTENT: this Decision concludes the Agreement between the EU and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation. The main elements of the agreement may be summarised as follows :

readmission obligations : these are drawn up in a fully reciprocal way , comprising own nationals as well as third country nationals and stateless persons; the obligation to readmit own nationals : this includes also former own nationals who have renounced, forfeited or who have been deprived of their nationality without acquiring the nationality of another State. It also covers also family members (i.e. spouses and minor unmarried children) regardless of their nationality and who do not have an independent right of residence in the Requesting State; the obligation to readmit third country nationals and stateless persons : this is linked to the following prerequisites: (a) the person concerned holds, at the time of submission of the readmission application, a valid visa or residence permit issued by the Requested State or (b) the person concerned illegally entered the territory of the Requesting State coming directly from the territory of the Requested State. Exempted from these obligations are persons in airside transit and all persons to whom the Requesting State has issued a visa or residence permit before or after the entry to its territory; provision for standard travel document : for own nationals as well as for third country nationals or stateless persons, Georgia accepts the use of the EU's standard travel document for expulsion purposes in case of expiry of specified delay; technical provisions concerning the readmission procedure : some procedural flexibility is provided by the fact that no readmission application will be needed in cases where the person to be readmitted is in possession of a valid travel document or identity card; accelerated procedure for persons apprehended in the “border region”: this covers an area which extends up to 5 kilometres from the territories of seaports including custom zones and from international airports of Member States or Georgia. Under the accelerated procedure, readmission applications have to be submitted within 2 days, and replies have to be given within 2 working days whereas under the normal procedure, the time limit for replies is 12 calendar days; specific rules are made for transit operations, costs, data protection and the relationship to other international obligations; Joint Readmission Committee : provisions are made for the tasks and powers of the committee.

Territorial measures : Ireland and Denmark are not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and are not bound by it or subject to its application. On the other hand the United Kingdom has notified its wish to take part in the adoption and application of the Decision.

It should be noted that since the two agreements on visa facilitation and readmission are linked, both agreements should be concluded and enter into force simultaneously.

ENTRY INTO FORCE: the Decision enters into force on 18 January 2011. The Agreement enters into force on 1 March 2011.

2011/01/18
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
2011/01/18
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2011/01/18
   CSL - Council Meeting
2010/12/14
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2010/12/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a legislative resolution in which it gives its consent to the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation.

Documents
2010/12/13
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2010/12/01
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2010/12/01
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2010/11/25
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2010/11/23
   CSL - Legislative proposal
Details

PURPOSE: to conclude the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.

BACKGROUND: the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation was signed by the Commission, subject to its conclusion at a later date.

It is now necessary to approve the Agreement on behalf of the Union.

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was carried out.

LEGAL BASIS: Article 79(3)(a), in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) (v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

CONTENT: under this proposed Decision, the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation is hereby approved.

The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision. For details of the content of the Agreement, please refer to the summary of the previous initial legislative document (dated 5 May 2010).

The Agreement establishes a Joint Committee which should adopt its rules of procedure. It is appropriate to provide for a simplified procedure for the establishment of the Union position in this case.

Territorial provisions : the United Kingdom has notified its wish to participate in the adoption and application of this Decision. On the other hand, Ireland shall not participate in the adoption of this Decision and shall not be bound or subject to its application. Denmark takes the same stance.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: this proposal has no implication for the Union’s budget.

Documents
2010/11/22
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to conclude the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.

BACKGROUND: the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation was signed by the Commission, subject to its conclusion at a later date.

It is now necessary to approve the Agreement on behalf of the Union.

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was carried out.

LEGAL BASIS: Article 79(3)(a), in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) (v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

CONTENT: under this proposed Decision, the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation is hereby approved.

The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision. For details of the content of the Agreement, please refer to the summary of the previous initial legislative document (dated 5 May 2010).

The Agreement establishes a Joint Committee which should adopt its rules of procedure. It is appropriate to provide for a simplified procedure for the establishment of the Union position in this case.

Territorial provisions : the United Kingdom has notified its wish to participate in the adoption and application of this Decision. On the other hand, Ireland shall not participate in the adoption of this Decision and shall not be bound or subject to its application. Denmark takes the same stance.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: this proposal has no implication for the Union’s budget.

Documents
2010/11/08
   CSL - Council Meeting
2010/10/29
   CSL - Document attached to the procedure
Documents
2010/10/26
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the report drafted by Nathalie GRIESBECK (ADLE, FR), recommending that the European Parliament consents to the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation.

2010/10/07
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2010/09/14
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2010/06/23
   EP - GRIESBECK Nathalie (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2010/06/10
   EP - LISEK Krzysztof (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET
2010/05/05
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
Details

PURPOSE: to sign the Agreement between the EU and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.

BACKGROUND: f ollowing the August 2008 conflict in Georgia, the Extraordinary European Council held in Brussels on 1 September 2008 decided to step up relations with Georgia, including visa facilitation measures. According to the December 2005 COREPER, a visa facilitation agreement would not be concluded if no readmission agreement were in place. Accordingly, in November 2008, the Justice and Home Affairs Council formally authorised the Commission to negotiate a readmission agreement between the EC and Georgia. The agreed text was initialled on 25 November 2009 in Brussels by the Chief Negotiators of both Parties. Member States have been regularly informed and consulted at all stages of the readmission negotiations.

The Commission considers that the objectives set by the Council in its negotiating directives were attained and that the draft Readmission Agreement is acceptable to the Union.

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was carried out.

LEGAL BASIS: Article 79(3), in conjunction with Article 218 (5) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

CONTENT: this proposal constitutes the legal instrument for the signature of the readmission agreement.

For details on the final content of the this Agreement, please refer to the summary of COM(2010)0200 of 5 May 2010.

Since the two agreements on visa facilitation and readmission are linked, both agreements should be concluded and enter into force simultaneously.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: the proposal has no implications for the Union’s budget.

2010/05/05
   EP - Preparatory document
Details

PURPOSE: to conclude an Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.

BACKGROUND: following the August 2008 conflict in Georgia, the Extraordinary European Council held in Brussels on 1 September 2008 decided "to step up relations with Georgia, including visa facilitation measures". According to the December 2005 COREPER common approach for the development of the EU policy on visa facilitation in principle, a visa facilitation agreement would not be concluded if no readmission agreement were in place.

On 27 November 2008, the Justice and Home Affairs Council formally authorised the Commission to negotiate a readmission agreement between the European Community and Georgia. In February 2009 the Commission transmitted a draft text to the Georgian authorities and the first round of formal negotiations could be held in Brussels on 2 April 2009.

Two further formal rounds of negotiations took place, the last one in Brussels on 24-25 August 2009.

Following a consultation and approval process on both sides as well as further clarification of a few additional points, the agreed text was initialled on 25 November 2009 in Brussels by the Chief Negotiators of both Parties.

Member States have been regularly informed and consulted at all (informal and formal) stages of the readmission negotiations.

The Commission considers that the objectives set by the Council in its negotiating directives were attained and that the draft Readmission Agreement is acceptable to the Union.

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was carried out.

LEGAL BASIS: Article 79(3), in conjunction with Article 218 of Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

CONTENT: the proposal constitutes the legal instrument for the conclusion of the readmission agreement. The Council will decide by qualified majority.

The proposed decision concerning the conclusion sets out the necessary internal arrangements for the practical application of the Agreement. In particular , it specifies that the Commission, assisted by experts from Member States, represents the Union within the Joint Readmission Committee set up by Article 18 of the Agreement. Under Article 18(5), the readmission committee shall adopt its own rules of procedure. As in the case for the other readmission agreements so far concluded by the Union, the Union position in this regard shall be established by the Commission in consultation with a special committee designated by the Council. As regards other decisions to be taken by the Joint Committee, the Union position shall be established in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Treaty.

The final content of the Agreement can be summarised as follows:

the readmission obligations set out in the Agreement (Articles 2 - 5) are drawn up in a fully reciprocal way , comprising own nationals (Articles 2 and 4) as well as third country nationals and stateless persons (Articles 3 and 5); the obligation to readmit own nationals includes also former own nationals who have renounced, forfeited or who have been deprived of their nationality without acquiring the nationality of another State; the readmission obligation with regard to own nationals covers also family members (i.e. spouses and minor unmarried children) regardless of their nationality and who do not have an independent right of residence in the Requesting State; the obligation to readmit third country nationals and stateless persons (Articles 3 and 5) is linked to the following prerequisites: (a) the person concerned holds, at the time of submission of the readmission application, a valid visa or residence permit issued by the Requested State or (b) the person concerned illegally entered the territory of the Requesting State coming directly from the territory of the Requested State. Exempted from these obligations are persons in airside transit and all persons to whom the Requesting State has issued a visa or residence permit before or after the entry to its territory; for own nationals as well as for third country nationals or stateless persons, in case of expiry of specified delay, Georgia accepts the use of the EU's standard travel document for expulsion purposes (Articles 2(5) and 3(3)); Section III of the Agreement (Articles 6 to 12 in conj. with annexes 1 to 5) contains the necessary technical provisions regarding the readmission procedure (readmission application, means of evidence, time limits, transfer modalities and modes of transportation) and 'readmission in error' (Article 12). Some procedural flexibility is provided by the fact that no readmission application will be needed in cases where the person to be readmitted is in possession of a valid travel document or identity card (Article 6(2)); in its Article 6(3), the Agreement sets out the so-called accelerated procedure, which has been agreed upon for persons apprehended in the “ border region ”, i.e. within an area which extends up to 5 kilometres from the territories of seaports including custom zones and from international airports of Member States or Georgia. Under the accelerated procedure, readmission applications have to be submitted within 2 days, and replies have to be given within 2 working days whereas under the normal procedure, the time limit for replies is 12 calendar days; the Agreement contains a section on transit operations (Articles 13 and 14 in conj. with annex 6); Articles 15, 16 and 17 contain the necessary rules on costs, data protection and the relation to other International obligations; the Joint Readmission Committee will be composed, and have the tasks and powers, as set out in Article 18; in order to facilitate the implementation of this Agreement, Article 19 creates the possibility for Georgia and individual Member States to conclude bilateral implementing Protocols. The relation between the bilateral implementing Protocols and this Agreement is clarified by Article 20; the final provisions (Art. 21 to 24) contain the necessary rules on entry into force, duration, possible amendments, termination and the legal status of the annexes to the agreement.

Territorial measures : the specific situation of Denmark is reflected in the preamble and in a joint declaration attached to the Agreement. The close association of Norway, Iceland and Switzerland to the implementation, application and development of the Schengen Acquis is likewise reflected in a joint declaration to the Agreement.

Since the two agreements on visa facilitation and readmission are linked, both agreements should be concluded and enter into force simultaneously.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: the proposal has no implications for the Union’s budget.

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0199/COM_COM(2010)0199_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0199/COM_COM(2010)0199_EN.pdf
docs/4
date
2010-11-23T00:00:00
docs
url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=15507%2F10&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 15507/2010
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
CSL
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0200/COM_COM(2010)0200_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0200/COM_COM(2010)0200_EN.pdf
events/2/date
Old
2010-11-23T00:00:00
New
2010-11-22T00:00:00
links/National parliaments/url
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=NLE&year=2010&number=0108&appLng=EN
New
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=NLE&year=2010&number=0108&appLng=EN
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE448.825
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-PR-448825_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE448.670&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-448670_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0346_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0346_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0346_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0346_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20101213&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2010-12-13-TOC_EN.html
events/7
date
2010-12-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0472_EN.html title: T7-0472/2010
summary
The European Parliament adopted a legislative resolution in which it gives its consent to the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation.
events/7
date
2010-12-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0472_EN.html title: T7-0472/2010
summary
The European Parliament adopted a legislative resolution in which it gives its consent to the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation.
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: GRIESBECK Nathalie date: 2010-06-23T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
name: MACOVEI Monica group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2010-06-23T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GRIESBECK Nathalie group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
name: MACOVEI Monica group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: LISEK Krzysztof date: 2010-06-10T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2010-06-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LISEK Krzysztof group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0199/COM_COM(2010)0199_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0199/COM_COM(2010)0199_EN.pdf
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-346&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0346_EN.html
events/0
date
2010-05-05T00:00:00
type
Preparatory document
body
EP
docs
summary
events/0
date
2010-05-05T00:00:00
type
Initial legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-346&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0346_EN.html
events/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-472
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0472_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2010-05-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0200/COM_COM(2010)0200_EN.pdf title: COM(2010)0200 type: Initial legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52010PC0200:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice Commissioner: FÜLE Štefan type: Initial legislative proposal published
  • date: 2010-10-26T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2010-06-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: LISEK Krzysztof body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: MACOVEI Monica responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2010-06-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: GRIESBECK Nathalie type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2010-11-08T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 3043
  • date: 2010-11-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=15507%2F10&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Legislative proposal published title: 15507/2010 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice Commissioner: FÜLE Štefan type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2010-11-25T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2010-06-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: LISEK Krzysztof body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: MACOVEI Monica responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2010-06-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: GRIESBECK Nathalie
  • date: 2010-12-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-346&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A7-0346/2010 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2010-06-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: LISEK Krzysztof body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: MACOVEI Monica responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2010-06-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: GRIESBECK Nathalie type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2010-12-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20101213&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2010-12-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=19219&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-472 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0472/2010 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2011-01-18T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 3062
  • date: 2011-01-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2011-01-18T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
  • date: 2011-02-25T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32011D0118 title: Decision 2011/118 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2011:052:TOC title: OJ L 052 25.02.2011, p. 0045
commission
  • body: EC dg: Justice and Consumers commissioner: FÜLE Štefan
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2010-06-23T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GRIESBECK Nathalie group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
name: MACOVEI Monica group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
AFET
date
2010-06-10T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE name: LISEK Krzysztof
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2010-06-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LISEK Krzysztof group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
body
EP
shadows
group: PPE name: MACOVEI Monica
responsible
True
committee
LIBE
date
2010-06-23T00:00:00
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: GRIESBECK Nathalie
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 3062 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3062*&MEET_DATE=18/01/2011 date: 2011-01-18T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 3043 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3043*&MEET_DATE=08/11/2010 date: 2010-11-08T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2010-05-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0199/COM_COM(2010)0199_EN.pdf title: COM(2010)0199 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2010&nu_doc=199 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to sign the Agreement between the EU and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation. PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision. BACKGROUND: f ollowing the August 2008 conflict in Georgia, the Extraordinary European Council held in Brussels on 1 September 2008 decided to step up relations with Georgia, including visa facilitation measures. According to the December 2005 COREPER, a visa facilitation agreement would not be concluded if no readmission agreement were in place. Accordingly, in November 2008, the Justice and Home Affairs Council formally authorised the Commission to negotiate a readmission agreement between the EC and Georgia. The agreed text was initialled on 25 November 2009 in Brussels by the Chief Negotiators of both Parties. Member States have been regularly informed and consulted at all stages of the readmission negotiations. The Commission considers that the objectives set by the Council in its negotiating directives were attained and that the draft Readmission Agreement is acceptable to the Union. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was carried out. LEGAL BASIS: Article 79(3), in conjunction with Article 218 (5) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). CONTENT: this proposal constitutes the legal instrument for the signature of the readmission agreement. For details on the final content of the this Agreement, please refer to the summary of COM(2010)0200 of 5 May 2010. Since the two agreements on visa facilitation and readmission are linked, both agreements should be concluded and enter into force simultaneously. BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: the proposal has no implications for the Union’s budget. type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2010-09-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE448.825 title: PE448.825 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2010-10-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE448.670&secondRef=02 title: PE448.670 committee: AFET type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2010-10-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=14654%2F10&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 14654/2010 type: Document attached to the procedure body: CSL
  • date: 2010-12-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-346&language=EN title: A7-0346/2010 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
events
  • date: 2010-05-05T00:00:00 type: Initial legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0200/COM_COM(2010)0200_EN.pdf title: COM(2010)0200 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2010&nu_doc=200 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to conclude an Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation. PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision. BACKGROUND: following the August 2008 conflict in Georgia, the Extraordinary European Council held in Brussels on 1 September 2008 decided "to step up relations with Georgia, including visa facilitation measures". According to the December 2005 COREPER common approach for the development of the EU policy on visa facilitation in principle, a visa facilitation agreement would not be concluded if no readmission agreement were in place. On 27 November 2008, the Justice and Home Affairs Council formally authorised the Commission to negotiate a readmission agreement between the European Community and Georgia. In February 2009 the Commission transmitted a draft text to the Georgian authorities and the first round of formal negotiations could be held in Brussels on 2 April 2009. Two further formal rounds of negotiations took place, the last one in Brussels on 24-25 August 2009. Following a consultation and approval process on both sides as well as further clarification of a few additional points, the agreed text was initialled on 25 November 2009 in Brussels by the Chief Negotiators of both Parties. Member States have been regularly informed and consulted at all (informal and formal) stages of the readmission negotiations. The Commission considers that the objectives set by the Council in its negotiating directives were attained and that the draft Readmission Agreement is acceptable to the Union. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was carried out. LEGAL BASIS: Article 79(3), in conjunction with Article 218 of Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. CONTENT: the proposal constitutes the legal instrument for the conclusion of the readmission agreement. The Council will decide by qualified majority. The proposed decision concerning the conclusion sets out the necessary internal arrangements for the practical application of the Agreement. In particular , it specifies that the Commission, assisted by experts from Member States, represents the Union within the Joint Readmission Committee set up by Article 18 of the Agreement. Under Article 18(5), the readmission committee shall adopt its own rules of procedure. As in the case for the other readmission agreements so far concluded by the Union, the Union position in this regard shall be established by the Commission in consultation with a special committee designated by the Council. As regards other decisions to be taken by the Joint Committee, the Union position shall be established in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Treaty. The final content of the Agreement can be summarised as follows: the readmission obligations set out in the Agreement (Articles 2 - 5) are drawn up in a fully reciprocal way , comprising own nationals (Articles 2 and 4) as well as third country nationals and stateless persons (Articles 3 and 5); the obligation to readmit own nationals includes also former own nationals who have renounced, forfeited or who have been deprived of their nationality without acquiring the nationality of another State; the readmission obligation with regard to own nationals covers also family members (i.e. spouses and minor unmarried children) regardless of their nationality and who do not have an independent right of residence in the Requesting State; the obligation to readmit third country nationals and stateless persons (Articles 3 and 5) is linked to the following prerequisites: (a) the person concerned holds, at the time of submission of the readmission application, a valid visa or residence permit issued by the Requested State or (b) the person concerned illegally entered the territory of the Requesting State coming directly from the territory of the Requested State. Exempted from these obligations are persons in airside transit and all persons to whom the Requesting State has issued a visa or residence permit before or after the entry to its territory; for own nationals as well as for third country nationals or stateless persons, in case of expiry of specified delay, Georgia accepts the use of the EU's standard travel document for expulsion purposes (Articles 2(5) and 3(3)); Section III of the Agreement (Articles 6 to 12 in conj. with annexes 1 to 5) contains the necessary technical provisions regarding the readmission procedure (readmission application, means of evidence, time limits, transfer modalities and modes of transportation) and 'readmission in error' (Article 12). Some procedural flexibility is provided by the fact that no readmission application will be needed in cases where the person to be readmitted is in possession of a valid travel document or identity card (Article 6(2)); in its Article 6(3), the Agreement sets out the so-called accelerated procedure, which has been agreed upon for persons apprehended in the “ border region ”, i.e. within an area which extends up to 5 kilometres from the territories of seaports including custom zones and from international airports of Member States or Georgia. Under the accelerated procedure, readmission applications have to be submitted within 2 days, and replies have to be given within 2 working days whereas under the normal procedure, the time limit for replies is 12 calendar days; the Agreement contains a section on transit operations (Articles 13 and 14 in conj. with annex 6); Articles 15, 16 and 17 contain the necessary rules on costs, data protection and the relation to other International obligations; the Joint Readmission Committee will be composed, and have the tasks and powers, as set out in Article 18; in order to facilitate the implementation of this Agreement, Article 19 creates the possibility for Georgia and individual Member States to conclude bilateral implementing Protocols. The relation between the bilateral implementing Protocols and this Agreement is clarified by Article 20; the final provisions (Art. 21 to 24) contain the necessary rules on entry into force, duration, possible amendments, termination and the legal status of the annexes to the agreement. Territorial measures : the specific situation of Denmark is reflected in the preamble and in a joint declaration attached to the Agreement. The close association of Norway, Iceland and Switzerland to the implementation, application and development of the Schengen Acquis is likewise reflected in a joint declaration to the Agreement. Since the two agreements on visa facilitation and readmission are linked, both agreements should be concluded and enter into force simultaneously. BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: the proposal has no implications for the Union’s budget.
  • date: 2010-10-26T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the report drafted by Nathalie GRIESBECK (ADLE, FR), recommending that the European Parliament consents to the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation.
  • date: 2010-11-23T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=15507%2F10&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 15507/2010 summary: PURPOSE: to conclude the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation. PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision. BACKGROUND: the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation was signed by the Commission, subject to its conclusion at a later date. It is now necessary to approve the Agreement on behalf of the Union. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was carried out. LEGAL BASIS: Article 79(3)(a), in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) (v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). CONTENT: under this proposed Decision, the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation is hereby approved. The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision. For details of the content of the Agreement, please refer to the summary of the previous initial legislative document (dated 5 May 2010). The Agreement establishes a Joint Committee which should adopt its rules of procedure. It is appropriate to provide for a simplified procedure for the establishment of the Union position in this case. Territorial provisions : the United Kingdom has notified its wish to participate in the adoption and application of this Decision. On the other hand, Ireland shall not participate in the adoption of this Decision and shall not be bound or subject to its application. Denmark takes the same stance. BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: this proposal has no implication for the Union’s budget.
  • date: 2010-11-25T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2010-12-01T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-346&language=EN title: A7-0346/2010
  • date: 2010-12-13T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20101213&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2010-12-14T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=19219&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2010-12-14T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-472 title: T7-0472/2010 summary: The European Parliament adopted a legislative resolution in which it gives its consent to the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation.
  • date: 2011-01-18T00:00:00 type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2011-01-18T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2011-02-25T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to conclude an agreement between the EU and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation. NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Council Decision 2011/118/EU on the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation. BACKGROUND: in accordance with Council Decision 2010/687/EU the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation was signed, on behalf of the EU, on 17 June 2010, subject to its conclusion at a later date. The Agreement should now be approved. Furthermore, the Agreement establishes a Joint Readmission Committee which may adopt its rules of procedure, and there is provision for a simplified procedure for the establishment of the Union position in this case. CONTENT: this Decision concludes the Agreement between the EU and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation. The main elements of the agreement may be summarised as follows : readmission obligations : these are drawn up in a fully reciprocal way , comprising own nationals as well as third country nationals and stateless persons; the obligation to readmit own nationals : this includes also former own nationals who have renounced, forfeited or who have been deprived of their nationality without acquiring the nationality of another State. It also covers also family members (i.e. spouses and minor unmarried children) regardless of their nationality and who do not have an independent right of residence in the Requesting State; the obligation to readmit third country nationals and stateless persons : this is linked to the following prerequisites: (a) the person concerned holds, at the time of submission of the readmission application, a valid visa or residence permit issued by the Requested State or (b) the person concerned illegally entered the territory of the Requesting State coming directly from the territory of the Requested State. Exempted from these obligations are persons in airside transit and all persons to whom the Requesting State has issued a visa or residence permit before or after the entry to its territory; provision for standard travel document : for own nationals as well as for third country nationals or stateless persons, Georgia accepts the use of the EU's standard travel document for expulsion purposes in case of expiry of specified delay; technical provisions concerning the readmission procedure : some procedural flexibility is provided by the fact that no readmission application will be needed in cases where the person to be readmitted is in possession of a valid travel document or identity card; accelerated procedure for persons apprehended in the “border region”: this covers an area which extends up to 5 kilometres from the territories of seaports including custom zones and from international airports of Member States or Georgia. Under the accelerated procedure, readmission applications have to be submitted within 2 days, and replies have to be given within 2 working days whereas under the normal procedure, the time limit for replies is 12 calendar days; specific rules are made for transit operations, costs, data protection and the relationship to other international obligations; Joint Readmission Committee : provisions are made for the tasks and powers of the committee. Territorial measures : Ireland and Denmark are not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and are not bound by it or subject to its application. On the other hand the United Kingdom has notified its wish to take part in the adoption and application of the Decision. It should be noted that since the two agreements on visa facilitation and readmission are linked, both agreements should be concluded and enter into force simultaneously. ENTRY INTO FORCE: the Decision enters into force on 18 January 2011. The Agreement enters into force on 1 March 2011. docs: title: Decision 2011/118 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32011D0118 title: OJ L 052 25.02.2011, p. 0045 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2011:052:TOC
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice commissioner: FÜLE Štefan
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
LIBE/7/02878
New
  • LIBE/7/02878
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32011D0118
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32011D0118
procedure/subject
Old
  • 6.40.04.04 Relations with Caucasus countries
  • 7.10.04 External borders crossing and controls, visas
  • 7.10.08 Migration policy
New
6.40.04.04
Relations with Caucasus countries
7.10.04
External borders crossing and controls, visas
7.10.08
Migration policy
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0200/COM_COM(2010)0200_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0200/COM_COM(2010)0200_EN.pdf
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/0/mepref
4f1ad952b819f207b300000e
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/0/name
Old
MACOVEI Monica Luisa
New
MACOVEI Monica
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/0/mepref
4f1ad952b819f207b300000e
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/0/name
Old
MACOVEI Monica Luisa
New
MACOVEI Monica
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/0/mepref
4f1ad952b819f207b300000e
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/0/name
Old
MACOVEI Monica Luisa
New
MACOVEI Monica
committees/1/shadows/0/mepref
4f1ad952b819f207b300000e
committees/1/shadows/0/name
Old
MACOVEI Monica Luisa
New
MACOVEI Monica
links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
activities
  • date: 2010-05-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0200/COM_COM(2010)0200_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52010PC0200:EN type: Initial legislative proposal published title: COM(2010)0200 type: Initial legislative proposal published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice Commissioner: FÜLE Štefan
  • date: 2010-10-26T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2010-06-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: LISEK Krzysztof body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: MACOVEI Monica Luisa responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2010-06-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: GRIESBECK Nathalie type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2010-11-08T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 3043
  • date: 2010-11-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=15507%2F10&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Legislative proposal published title: 15507/2010 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice Commissioner: FÜLE Štefan
  • date: 2010-11-25T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2010-06-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: LISEK Krzysztof body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: MACOVEI Monica Luisa responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2010-06-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: GRIESBECK Nathalie
  • date: 2010-12-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-346&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A7-0346/2010 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2010-06-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: LISEK Krzysztof body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: MACOVEI Monica Luisa responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2010-06-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: GRIESBECK Nathalie type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2010-12-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20101213&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2010-12-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=19219&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-472 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0472/2010 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2011-01-18T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 3062
  • date: 2011-01-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2011-01-18T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
  • date: 2011-02-25T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32011D0118 title: Decision 2011/118 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2011:052:TOC title: OJ L 052 25.02.2011, p. 0045
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2010-06-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: LISEK Krzysztof
  • body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: MACOVEI Monica Luisa responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2010-06-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: GRIESBECK Nathalie
links
National parliaments
European Commission
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice commissioner: FÜLE Štefan
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
LIBE/7/02878
reference
2010/0108(NLE)
title
EU/Georgia Agreement: readmission of persons residing without authorisation
geographical_area
Georgia
stage_reached
Procedure completed
instrument
Decision
subtype
Consent by Parliament
type
NLE - Non-legislative enactments
final
subject