BETA


2010/2543(RSP) Resolution on the EU 2020 strategy

Progress: Procedure completed

Legal Basis:
RoP 132-p2

Events

2010/06/25
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2010/03/10
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2010/03/10
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2010/03/10
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2010/03/10
   Joint motion for resolution
Documents
2010/03/10
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2010/03/10
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 462 votes to 140 with 58 abstentions a resolution on EU 2020.

The resolution was tabled by the S&D, EPP, and ALDE.

It believes that the EU 2020 strategy must provide an effective response to the economic and financial crisis, and lend new ambition and European coherence to the EU recovery process by mobilising and coordinating national and European instruments. Parliament recalls the 4% drop in GDP, falling industrial production and a total of more than 23 million unemployed women and men representing a human and economic disaster. Given that too many European targets were not met under the previous Lisbon Strategy, the European Council's decision to set fewer targets, but to make them clearer, more realistic and more quantifiable is welcome. Members state that the Lisbon Strategy underperformed owing to a weak governance structure, a lack of accountability, a highly complex objective with too many targets, over-ambitious goals and a lack of clarity, focus and transparency.

A social market economy : in order to address high unemployment, Members believe that the EU must implement an ambitious social agenda, including efforts to promote longer and healthier lives, to combat poverty and social exclusion, to help workers combine employment with care responsibilities, to reduce early school leaving, to foster lifelong learning and to fight discrimination and promote gender mainstreaming, gender equality and workers" rights and good working conditions. Member States are urged to tackle unemployment by creating more training opportunities and internships for young people, while protecting them against unfair employment practices.

Parliament urges the EU to do the following:

create inclusive and competitive labour markets through the restructuring of social security systems and the provision of greater flexibility for employers, combined with appropriate short-term unemployment benefits and support for re-employability; facilitate the free movement of all citizens, including workers; professionals; business people, researchers, students and retired people; explore the possibility of European schemes designed to facilitate knowledge migration and prevent a European "brain drain", promote excellence and develop a network of leading universities at international level.

Members are disappointed that no mention was made of the agricultural sector in the original proposals for the EU 2020 strategy.

Strong European governance : Parliament feels that the EU 2020 strategy should provide a more target-based approach to the economic crisis , ensuring greater coherence between overlapping strategies, such as the Sustainable Development Strategy and the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP). It urges the European Council and the Commission as appropriate, to do the following:

abandon the "open coordination method", based on the "exchange of best practices" and "peer pressure", in the field of economic policy; use all available provisions of the Lisbon Treaty, such as Articles 121, 122, 136, 172, 173 and 194, in order to coordinate the Member States" economic reforms and action plans; draw up a precise scoreboard of obstacles and propose action on these key impediments, with a view to completing the internal market; put forward new measures, such as regulations and directives, and possible sanctions for those Member States that do not implement the EU 2020 strategy and incentives for those that do.

With regard to Member States, Parliament stresses the need for better cooperation with national parliaments and civil society , taking the view that involving more actors will increase the pressure on national administrations to deliver results.

It feels that Member States should:

draft national action plans stipulating maximum and minimum values for certain macro-economic aspects of their economies; indicate how they used EU funds to achieve the various EU 2020 objectives, and that EU funding should be conditional on results and compatibility with the objectives of the EU 2020 strategy.

Members take the view that since the Member States manage 80% of the EU budget themselves, the Commission should put more pressure on them to take responsibility for spending these funds correctly, and consider financial penalties in the event that Member States refuse to cooperate.

They recall that both the Commission and the European Council have underlined Parliament's crucial role in the EU 2020 strategy, and should therefore respect its prerogatives by presenting annual policy recommendations to Parliament before the European Council takes a decision. An Interinstitutional agreement needs to be drawn up in order to formalise a democratic way forward, which should include a commitment by the Council not to agree on changes to the strategy in coming years without formally consulting Parliament first.

Protecting the strength of the euro by stepping up financial oversight : budget consolidation and economic policies must be closely coordinated and Member States must comply with the criteria of the European Stability and Growth Pact (SGP). Parliament believes that the failure by several Member States in the eurozone to comply with the SGP shows the need to strengthen economic coordination among countries in the EMU. It considers it unfortunate that there are no mechanisms to safeguard the euro's stability . It stresses the need for a European supervisor to ensure effective oversight of micro- and macro-prudential supervision, and the need to establish an efficient European banking system capable of financing the real economy. Oversight cannot remain a purely national matter, since markets are international and financial institutions operate across borders.

Freeing up the potential of the European internal market : the single market contributes greatly to European prosperity, and Parliament takes the view that, since the internal market is a key area of the EU 2020 strategy, the Council and Commission should come up with proposals for completing the internal market. Members feel it essential to complete the internal energy market and that sustainable, low-carbon energy sources should account for a significant share of the EU's energy mix. In addition, European industry should take advantage of its leading role in the green mobility technologies by exploiting its export potential. However the EU economy needs sufficient high-tech raw materials in order to achieve this goal.

Promoting SMEs and jobs : Parliament believes that the Commission should have placed a greater emphasis on promoting and supporting small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), since most jobs are created in this sector and its innovation and technological progress play a crucial role in reinvigorating our economy. More proposals to reduce red tape and promote innovative ideas are required. It urges the Commission to put forward a strategy to combat youth unemployment.

Budget : Parliament feels that the current budget does not sufficiently reflect the financial needs associated with tackling 21st-century challenges . It urges the Commission to retain the target of spending 3% of GDP on R&D – as set out in the Lisbon Strategy – in the new strategy, for both the EU and national budgets.

It also asks the Commission to:

put forward a proposal to make European research more efficient by streamlining existing structures, cutting red tape and creating a more research- and innovation-friendly investment climate in the public and private sector; encourage new partnerships between business, science and university research.

Lastly, Members stress the importance of the transport sector, industry and social and territorial cohesion.

Documents
2010/03/10
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2010/03/03
   all - Additional information
Details

EU 2020

2010/02/24
   EP - Debate in Parliament
Details

The House held a debate, following on the Council and Commission statements, on the informal European Council of 11 February 2010. A motion for a resolution closing this debate was due to be put to the vote at the next part-session.

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/4/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=18138&j=0&l=en
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2010-0151_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2010-0151_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2010-0153_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2010-0153_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2010-0160_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2010-0160_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-7-2010-0151_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-7-2010-0151_EN.html
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20100224&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2010-02-24-TOC_EN.html
events/3
date
2010-03-10T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0053_EN.html title: T7-0053/2010
summary
events/3
date
2010-03-10T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0053_EN.html title: T7-0053/2010
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 132-p2
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 123-p2
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2010-151&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2010-0151_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2010-153&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2010-0153_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2010-160&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2010-0160_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=P7-RC-2010-151&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-7-2010-0151_EN.html
docs/4/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-53
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0053_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2010-02-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20100224&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2010-03-03T00:00:00 body: all type: Additional information
  • date: 2010-03-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=18138&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-53 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0053/2010 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Secretariat-General commissioner: BARROSO José Manuel
committees
    docs
    • date: 2010-03-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2010-151&language=EN title: B7-0151/2010 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2010-03-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2010-153&language=EN title: B7-0153/2010 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2010-03-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2010-160&language=EN title: B7-0160/2010 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2010-03-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=P7-RC-2010-151&language=EN title: RC-B7-0151/2010 type: Joint motion for resolution
    • date: 2010-06-25T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=18138&j=0&l=en title: SP(2010)2718/2 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
    events
    • date: 2010-02-24T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20100224&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament summary: The House held a debate, following on the Council and Commission statements, on the informal European Council of 11 February 2010. A motion for a resolution closing this debate was due to be put to the vote at the next part-session.
    • date: 2010-03-03T00:00:00 type: Additional information body: all summary: EU 2020
    • date: 2010-03-10T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=18138&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
    • date: 2010-03-10T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-53 title: T7-0053/2010 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 462 votes to 140 with 58 abstentions a resolution on EU 2020. The resolution was tabled by the S&D, EPP, and ALDE. It believes that the EU 2020 strategy must provide an effective response to the economic and financial crisis, and lend new ambition and European coherence to the EU recovery process by mobilising and coordinating national and European instruments. Parliament recalls the 4% drop in GDP, falling industrial production and a total of more than 23 million unemployed women and men representing a human and economic disaster. Given that too many European targets were not met under the previous Lisbon Strategy, the European Council's decision to set fewer targets, but to make them clearer, more realistic and more quantifiable is welcome. Members state that the Lisbon Strategy underperformed owing to a weak governance structure, a lack of accountability, a highly complex objective with too many targets, over-ambitious goals and a lack of clarity, focus and transparency. A social market economy : in order to address high unemployment, Members believe that the EU must implement an ambitious social agenda, including efforts to promote longer and healthier lives, to combat poverty and social exclusion, to help workers combine employment with care responsibilities, to reduce early school leaving, to foster lifelong learning and to fight discrimination and promote gender mainstreaming, gender equality and workers" rights and good working conditions. Member States are urged to tackle unemployment by creating more training opportunities and internships for young people, while protecting them against unfair employment practices. Parliament urges the EU to do the following: create inclusive and competitive labour markets through the restructuring of social security systems and the provision of greater flexibility for employers, combined with appropriate short-term unemployment benefits and support for re-employability; facilitate the free movement of all citizens, including workers; professionals; business people, researchers, students and retired people; explore the possibility of European schemes designed to facilitate knowledge migration and prevent a European "brain drain", promote excellence and develop a network of leading universities at international level. Members are disappointed that no mention was made of the agricultural sector in the original proposals for the EU 2020 strategy. Strong European governance : Parliament feels that the EU 2020 strategy should provide a more target-based approach to the economic crisis , ensuring greater coherence between overlapping strategies, such as the Sustainable Development Strategy and the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP). It urges the European Council and the Commission as appropriate, to do the following: abandon the "open coordination method", based on the "exchange of best practices" and "peer pressure", in the field of economic policy; use all available provisions of the Lisbon Treaty, such as Articles 121, 122, 136, 172, 173 and 194, in order to coordinate the Member States" economic reforms and action plans; draw up a precise scoreboard of obstacles and propose action on these key impediments, with a view to completing the internal market; put forward new measures, such as regulations and directives, and possible sanctions for those Member States that do not implement the EU 2020 strategy and incentives for those that do. With regard to Member States, Parliament stresses the need for better cooperation with national parliaments and civil society , taking the view that involving more actors will increase the pressure on national administrations to deliver results. It feels that Member States should: draft national action plans stipulating maximum and minimum values for certain macro-economic aspects of their economies; indicate how they used EU funds to achieve the various EU 2020 objectives, and that EU funding should be conditional on results and compatibility with the objectives of the EU 2020 strategy. Members take the view that since the Member States manage 80% of the EU budget themselves, the Commission should put more pressure on them to take responsibility for spending these funds correctly, and consider financial penalties in the event that Member States refuse to cooperate. They recall that both the Commission and the European Council have underlined Parliament's crucial role in the EU 2020 strategy, and should therefore respect its prerogatives by presenting annual policy recommendations to Parliament before the European Council takes a decision. An Interinstitutional agreement needs to be drawn up in order to formalise a democratic way forward, which should include a commitment by the Council not to agree on changes to the strategy in coming years without formally consulting Parliament first. Protecting the strength of the euro by stepping up financial oversight : budget consolidation and economic policies must be closely coordinated and Member States must comply with the criteria of the European Stability and Growth Pact (SGP). Parliament believes that the failure by several Member States in the eurozone to comply with the SGP shows the need to strengthen economic coordination among countries in the EMU. It considers it unfortunate that there are no mechanisms to safeguard the euro's stability . It stresses the need for a European supervisor to ensure effective oversight of micro- and macro-prudential supervision, and the need to establish an efficient European banking system capable of financing the real economy. Oversight cannot remain a purely national matter, since markets are international and financial institutions operate across borders. Freeing up the potential of the European internal market : the single market contributes greatly to European prosperity, and Parliament takes the view that, since the internal market is a key area of the EU 2020 strategy, the Council and Commission should come up with proposals for completing the internal market. Members feel it essential to complete the internal energy market and that sustainable, low-carbon energy sources should account for a significant share of the EU's energy mix. In addition, European industry should take advantage of its leading role in the green mobility technologies by exploiting its export potential. However the EU economy needs sufficient high-tech raw materials in order to achieve this goal. Promoting SMEs and jobs : Parliament believes that the Commission should have placed a greater emphasis on promoting and supporting small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), since most jobs are created in this sector and its innovation and technological progress play a crucial role in reinvigorating our economy. More proposals to reduce red tape and promote innovative ideas are required. It urges the Commission to put forward a strategy to combat youth unemployment. Budget : Parliament feels that the current budget does not sufficiently reflect the financial needs associated with tackling 21st-century challenges . It urges the Commission to retain the target of spending 3% of GDP on R&D – as set out in the Lisbon Strategy – in the new strategy, for both the EU and national budgets. It also asks the Commission to: put forward a proposal to make European research more efficient by streamlining existing structures, cutting red tape and creating a more research- and innovation-friendly investment climate in the public and private sector; encourage new partnerships between business, science and university research. Lastly, Members stress the importance of the transport sector, industry and social and territorial cohesion.
    • date: 2010-03-10T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
    links
    other
    • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/secretariat_general/index_en.htm title: Secretariat-General commissioner: BARROSO José Manuel
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 123-p2
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 123-p2
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 5.05 Economic growth
    • 8 State and evolution of the Union
    • 8.40.14 European Council
    New
    5.05
    Economic growth
    8
    State and evolution of the Union
    8.40.14
    European Council
    procedure/subtype
    Old
    Resolution on statements
    New
    Resolution on statement
    other/0/dg/title
    Old
    Secretariat General
    New
    Secretariat-General
    procedure/subject/2
    Old
    8.40.14 European Council meetings
    New
    8.40.14 European Council
    activities/0/docs/0/text/0
    Old
    The House held a debate, following on the Council and Commission statements, on the informal European Council of 11 February 2010.

    A motion for a resolution closing this debate was due to be put to the vote at the next part-session.
    New

    The House held a debate, following on the Council and Commission statements, on the informal European Council of 11 February 2010.

    A motion for a resolution closing this debate was due to be put to the vote at the next part-session.

    procedure/subject/2
    Old
    8.40.14 European councils
    New
    8.40.14 European Council meetings
    procedure/title
    Old
    Resolution on EU 2020 strategy
    New
    Resolution on the EU 2020 strategy
    activities
    • date: 2010-02-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20100224&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2010-03-03T00:00:00 body: all type: Additional information
    • date: 2010-03-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=18138&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-53 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0053/2010 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
    committees
      links
      other
      • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/secretariat_general/index_en.htm title: Secretariat General commissioner: BARROSO José Manuel
      procedure
      reference
      2010/2543(RSP)
      title
      Resolution on EU 2020 strategy
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 123-p2
      stage_reached
      Procedure completed
      subtype
      Resolution on statements
      type
      RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
      subject