BETA


2011/2549(RPS) Authorisation and refusal of authorisation of certain health claims made on foods and referring to children's development and health

Progress: Procedure rejected

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ENVI
Committee Opinion IMCO
Lead committee dossier:

Events

2011/04/21
   EP - Delegated act not objected by Parliament
2011/04/06
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2011/04/06
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament finally rejected in plenary a draft resolution tabled by its Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calling for the rejection of the Commission’s draft regulation on the authorisation and refusal of authorisation of certain health claims made on foods and referring to children’s development and health. The resolution did not in fact obtain the required qualified majority (388 votes) in the plenary vote. There were 328 votes against it, with 26 abstentions.

To recall, members of the parliamentary committee opposed the adoption of the draft regulation considering it to be incompatible with the aim and content of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 . This draft regulation provided in particular for the addition of a list of nutritional claims authorised by the European Union, a claim according to which docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) intake contributes to the normal visual development of infants up to 12 months of age.

For members of the committee, such a claim could be misleading because, even if scientific evidence shows that DHA in breast milk contributes to the visual development of infants, synthesised DHA added to formula milks and other foods intended for infants is, however, in a different biological environment to breast milk.

Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 requires that all new nutritional claims must be submitted to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) for its opinion. However, EFSA was not able to reach the conclusion that there is a cause and effect relationship between the intake of infant and follow-on formula supplemented with DHA and visual function which was the reason why members of the committee considered that more research was required into the possible effects, both beneficial and harmful, of DHA supplementation before the use of DHA in follow-on formulae and foods for infants can be claimed as beneficial. As a result, they called on Parliament to reject the draft regulation.

2011/03/31
   CSL - Council Meeting
2011/03/25
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2011/02/02
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2011/01/20
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

This draft Commission Regulation concerns the authorisation and refusal of authorisation of certain health claims made on foods and referring to children's development and health.

Pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 health claims made on foods are prohibited unless they are authorised by the Commission in accordance with that Regulation and included in a list of permitted claims.

Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 also provides that applications for authorisations of health claims may be submitted by food business operators to the national competent authority of a Member State. The national competent authority is to forward valid applications to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). The Authority is to inform without delay the other Member States and the Commission of the application, and to deliver an opinion on a health claim concerned.

The eight opinions referred to in this Regulation are related to applications for health claims referring to the effects of essential fatty acids on children’s development and health, as referred to in Article 14(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. The draft Regulation intends to include the health claims listed in Annex I (permitted health claims) to this Regulation may be made on foods on the European Union market in compliance with the conditions laid down in that Annex. The following health claims should be included in the Union list of permitted claims referred Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006:

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) intake contributes to the normal visual development of infants up to 12 months of age; Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) maternal intake contributes to the normal development of the eye of the foetus and breastfed infants; Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) maternal intake contributes to the normal brain development of the foetus and breastfed infants.

The Commission proposes that the following health claims be rejected :

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and arachidonic acid (ARA) contribute to the optimal brain development of infants and young children; Lipil® contributes to optimal brain development of infants and young children; Enfamil® Premium contributes to optimal brain development of infants and young children.

Documents

Documents

Votes

B7-0227/2011 - § 2 #

2011/04/06 Outcome: +: 333, -: 325, 0: 18
EL GB BE ES DK FR FI LT EE NL IE BG SI AT MT LV LU PT CZ RO CY SE SK DE HU IT PL
Total
21
65
18
44
13
70
12
12
5
23
11
17
5
15
5
8
6
20
20
32
5
17
13
91
16
66
45
icon: S&D S&D
173

Finland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

Against (1)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Greece Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

Greece GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
75

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

Lithuania ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
4

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
28

Greece EFD

2

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

France EFD

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
24

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

4

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Spain NI

1

Bulgaria NI

2

Romania NI

2

Hungary NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
1

Austria PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
51

Belgium ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
242

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

Against (2)

2

Malta PPE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

3

Czechia PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

2

B7-0227/2011 - Résolution #

2011/04/06 Outcome: +: 328, -: 323, 0: 26
EL FR BE ES GB DK FI RO IE LT EE NL BG PT LV LU SI CY CZ AT MT SK SE HU DE IT PL
Total
21
70
18
44
66
13
12
32
11
12
5
22
17
21
8
6
5
6
20
15
4
13
17
16
91
66
45
icon: S&D S&D
172

Finland S&D

2

Ireland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

Against (1)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
33

Greece GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
76

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Lithuania ALDE

Abstain (1)

2

Estonia ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1
4
icon: NI NI
25

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Spain NI

1

Romania NI

2

Bulgaria NI

2

Hungary NI

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
1

Austria PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
27

Greece EFD

2

France EFD

Against (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Lithuania EFD

2

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
51

Belgium ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
242

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

3

Slovenia PPE

Against (2)

2

Cyprus PPE

2

Czechia PPE

2

Malta PPE

Against (2)

2

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2011-0227_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2011-0227_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/3/type
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Decision by Parliament
committees/0/date
    committees/1/date
      docs/0/docs/0/url
      Old
      http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2011-227&language=EN
      New
      http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2011-0227_EN.html
      events/2
      date
      2011-04-06T00:00:00
      type
      Results of vote in Parliament
      body
      EP
      docs
      url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=19957&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
      activities
      • date: 2011-01-20T00:00:00 docs: type: Non-legislative basic document published title: D012200/02 body: EC commission: type: Non-legislative basic document published
      • date: 2011-02-02T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
      • date: 2011-03-31T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 3080
      • date: 2011-04-06T00:00:00 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
      • date: 2011-04-21T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Delegated act not objected by Parliament
      committees/0
      type
      Responsible Committee
      body
      EP
      associated
      False
      committee_full
      Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
      committee
      ENVI
      date
      committees/0
      body
      EP
      responsible
      True
      committee_full
      Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
      committee
      ENVI
      committees/1
      type
      Committee Opinion
      body
      EP
      associated
      False
      committee_full
      Internal Market and Consumer Protection
      committee
      IMCO
      date
      committees/1
      body
      EP
      responsible
      False
      committee_full
      Internal Market and Consumer Protection
      committee
      IMCO
      council
      • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 3080 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3080*&MEET_DATE=31/03/2011 date: 2011-03-31T00:00:00
      docs
      • date: 2011-03-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2011-227&language=EN title: B7-0227/2011 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
      events
      • date: 2011-01-20T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: title: D012200/02 summary: This draft Commission Regulation concerns the authorisation and refusal of authorisation of certain health claims made on foods and referring to children's development and health. Pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 health claims made on foods are prohibited unless they are authorised by the Commission in accordance with that Regulation and included in a list of permitted claims. Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 also provides that applications for authorisations of health claims may be submitted by food business operators to the national competent authority of a Member State. The national competent authority is to forward valid applications to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). The Authority is to inform without delay the other Member States and the Commission of the application, and to deliver an opinion on a health claim concerned. The eight opinions referred to in this Regulation are related to applications for health claims referring to the effects of essential fatty acids on children’s development and health, as referred to in Article 14(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. The draft Regulation intends to include the health claims listed in Annex I (permitted health claims) to this Regulation may be made on foods on the European Union market in compliance with the conditions laid down in that Annex. The following health claims should be included in the Union list of permitted claims referred Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006: Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) intake contributes to the normal visual development of infants up to 12 months of age; Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) maternal intake contributes to the normal development of the eye of the foetus and breastfed infants; Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) maternal intake contributes to the normal brain development of the foetus and breastfed infants. The Commission proposes that the following health claims be rejected : Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and arachidonic acid (ARA) contribute to the optimal brain development of infants and young children; Lipil® contributes to optimal brain development of infants and young children; Enfamil® Premium contributes to optimal brain development of infants and young children.
      • date: 2011-02-02T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
      • date: 2011-04-06T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The European Parliament finally rejected in plenary a draft resolution tabled by its Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calling for the rejection of the Commission’s draft regulation on the authorisation and refusal of authorisation of certain health claims made on foods and referring to children’s development and health. The resolution did not in fact obtain the required qualified majority (388 votes) in the plenary vote. There were 328 votes against it, with 26 abstentions. To recall, members of the parliamentary committee opposed the adoption of the draft regulation considering it to be incompatible with the aim and content of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 . This draft regulation provided in particular for the addition of a list of nutritional claims authorised by the European Union, a claim according to which docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) intake contributes to the normal visual development of infants up to 12 months of age. For members of the committee, such a claim could be misleading because, even if scientific evidence shows that DHA in breast milk contributes to the visual development of infants, synthesised DHA added to formula milks and other foods intended for infants is, however, in a different biological environment to breast milk. Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 requires that all new nutritional claims must be submitted to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) for its opinion. However, EFSA was not able to reach the conclusion that there is a cause and effect relationship between the intake of infant and follow-on formula supplemented with DHA and visual function which was the reason why members of the committee considered that more research was required into the possible effects, both beneficial and harmful, of DHA supplementation before the use of DHA in follow-on formulae and foods for infants can be claimed as beneficial. As a result, they called on Parliament to reject the draft regulation.
      • date: 2011-04-21T00:00:00 type: Delegated act not objected by Parliament body: EP
      links
      other
        procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
        Old
        ENVI/7/05191
        New
        • ENVI/7/05191
        procedure/subject
        Old
        • 3.10.10 Foodstuffs, foodstuffs legislation
        • 4.20.05 Health legislation and policy
        • 4.60.04.04 Food safety
        New
        3.10.10
        Foodstuffs, foodstuffs legislation
        4.20.05
        Health legislation and policy
        4.60.04.04
        Food safety
        procedure/subtype
        Old
        Comitology with scrutiny
        New
        • Comitology with scrutiny
        • See also 2003/0165(COD)
        procedure/summary
        • See also
        procedure/type
        Old
        RPS - Regulatory procedure with scrutiny
        New
        RPS - Implementing acts
        activities
        • date: 2011-01-20T00:00:00 docs: type: Non-legislative basic document published title: D012200/02 body: EC commission: type: Non-legislative basic document published
        • date: 2011-02-02T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
        • date: 2011-03-31T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 3080
        • date: 2011-04-06T00:00:00 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
        • date: 2011-04-21T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Delegated act not objected by Parliament
        committees
        • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
        • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
        links
        other
          procedure
          dossier_of_the_committee
          ENVI/7/05191
          reference
          2011/2549(RPS)
          title
          Authorisation and refusal of authorisation of certain health claims made on foods and referring to children's development and health
          stage_reached
          Procedure rejected
          summary
          See also
          subtype
          Comitology with scrutiny
          type
          RPS - Regulatory procedure with scrutiny
          subject