Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | INTA | ŠŤASTNÝ Peter ( PPE) | JADOT Yannick ( Verts/ALE), STURDY Robert ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | IMCO |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 207-p4, TFEU 218-p6a
Legal Basis:
TFEU 207-p4, TFEU 218-p6aSubjects
Events
PURPOSE: to conclude an Agreement between the EU and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security.
NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Council Decision 2014/941/EU on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security
BACKGROUND: in accordance with Council Decision 2012/643/EU, the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security was signed on 4 March 2013, subject to its conclusion.
The Agreement should be approved on behalf of the Union.
CONTENT: under this Decision, the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security is approved on behalf of the Union.
The Agreement constitutes an expansion of the CMAA , which sets down that the Contracting Parties may expand the CMAA with a view to increasing the levels of customs cooperation and supplementing them by means of agreements on specific sectors or matters.
Objectives of the Agreement : the Agreement establishes a legal basis for EU-Canada customs cooperation on matters of:
· supply chain security and risk management , including reinforcing the customs related aspects for securing the logistics chain of international trade while at the same time: facilitating legitimate trade;
· establishing minimum standards , to the extent practicable, for risk management techniques and related requirements and programmes;
· working towards and, where appropriate, establishing mutual recognition of risk management techniques, risk standards, security controls, container security and trade partnership programmes including equivalent trade facilitation measures;
· exchanging information for supply chain security and risk management subject to the confidentiality of information and personal data protection requirements set out in Article 16 of the CMAA and in the relevant legislation of the Contracting Parties;
· establishing contact points for exchanging information;
· introducing, where appropriate, an interface for data exchange, including for prearrival or pre-departure data;
· developing a strategy that allows the customs authorities to partner cooperatively in the area of cargo inspection;
· collaborating, to the extent practicable, in any multilateral fora where issues related to supply chain security may be appropriately raised and discussed.
Institutional provisions : the Joint Customs Cooperation Committee (JCCC), established under the CMAA, shall see to the proper functioning of this Agreement and be empowered to adopt decisions to implement this Agreement in accordance with the respective domestic legislation of the Contracting Parties, on aspects, such as mutual recognition of risk management techniques, risk standards, security controls and trade partnership programmes.
The position to be adopted by the Union within the EU-Canada Joint Customs Cooperation Committee (JCCC), when called upon to adopt acts having legal effects, should be decided in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 218(9) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Where necessary, other positions to be taken by the Union within the JCCC should be established by the Council in accordance with Article 16 of the Treaty on European Union.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: the Decision enters into force on 27. 06.2013. The date of entry into force of the Agreement will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union by the General Secretariat of the Council.
The European Parliament adopted by 661 votes to 6, with 21 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply-chain security.
Parliament gave its consent to the conclusion of the Agreement.
The Committee on International Trade unanimously adopted the recommendation by Peter ŠŤASTNÝ (EPP, SK) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply-chain security.
The committee recommends the European Parliament to give its consent to the conclusion of the Agreement which seeks to reinforce the customs related aspects for securing the logistics chain of international trade - including container security - while at the same time facilitating legitimate trade.
PURPOSE: to conclude the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the Council may adopt the act only if the European Parliament has given its consent.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 207(4) first subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
BACKGROUND: the Union and Canada should expand their customs cooperation to cover matters of supply chain security and related risk management with a view to increasing end-to-end supply chain security and at the same time facilitating legitimate trade.
In accordance with a Council Decision, the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security was signed, subject to its conclusion.
The Agreement should be approved on behalf of the EU.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 207(4) first subparagraph of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) thereof.
CONTENT: with this Council proposal, it is proposed to approve on behalf of the European Union, the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security.
The position to be adopted by the Union within the EU-Canada Joint Customs Cooperation Committee (JCCC), when called upon to adopt acts having legal effects, should be decided in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 218(9) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Where necessary, other positions to be taken by the Union within the JCCC should be established by the Council in accordance with Article 16 of the Treaty on European Union.
For further information concerning the main provision of the draft Agreement, as well as its financial implications for the European Union’s budget, please refer to the summary of the Commission’s initial legislative proposal, dated 28/03/2012 .
PURPOSE: to conclude the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the Council may adopt the act only if the European Parliament has given its consent.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 207(4) first subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
BACKGROUND: the Union and Canada should expand their customs cooperation to cover matters of supply chain security and related risk management with a view to increasing end-to-end supply chain security and at the same time facilitating legitimate trade.
In accordance with a Council Decision, the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security was signed, subject to its conclusion.
The Agreement should be approved on behalf of the EU.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 207(4) first subparagraph of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) thereof.
CONTENT: with this Council proposal, it is proposed to approve on behalf of the European Union, the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security.
The position to be adopted by the Union within the EU-Canada Joint Customs Cooperation Committee (JCCC), when called upon to adopt acts having legal effects, should be decided in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 218(9) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Where necessary, other positions to be taken by the Union within the JCCC should be established by the Council in accordance with Article 16 of the Treaty on European Union.
For further information concerning the main provision of the draft Agreement, as well as its financial implications for the European Union’s budget, please refer to the summary of the Commission’s initial legislative proposal, dated 28/03/2012 .
The Council discussed negotiations with Canada on a comprehensive economic and trade agreement. It addressed key outstanding issues, notably on rules of origin and intellectual property rights, with particular reference to pharmaceutical products.
The Council was briefed by the Commission on progress achieved, especially in the areas of market access for goods, public procurement, services, dispute settlement and, to a lesser extent, sanitary and phytosanitary issues and investment protection.
It took note of the Commission's assessment of the prospects for concluding the agreement in the near future, and called for full transparency in the final stages of the negotiations.
Executive summary of the Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Canada with respect to matters related to supply chain security.
The EDPS recalls that relations between the EU and Canada in the area of customs are based on the Agreement on customs cooperation and mutual assistance in customs matters (CMAA) of 1998, which allows the contracting parties to expand the agreement to increase customs cooperation.
On 28 March 2012, the Commission adopted a proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Canada with respect to matters related to supply chain security. The proposal was sent to the EDPS on the same day.
The proposal aims at expanding the CMAA through a new, complementary agreement and at establishing a legal basis for EU-Canada customs cooperation on matters of supply chain security and related risk management.
The draft agreement also aims at providing a legal basis for the exchange of information. While the exchange of personal data is not the main aim of the proposal, significant exchanges of personal data will take place, especially related to operators.
The EDPS’ Opinion analyses (i) how the exchange of such personal data is regulated in the draft agreement; (ii) relevant provisions of the CMAA agreement insofar as they have an effect on the processing of personal data under the draft agreement .
Aim of the EDPS Opinion: according to the proposal, the draft agreement also aims at providing a legal basis for the exchange of information. While the exchange of personal data is not the main aim of the proposal, significant exchanges of personal data will take place, especially related to operators. The present Opinion will analyse how the exchange of such personal data is regulated in the draft agreement . The Opinion will also analyse the relevant provisions of the CMAA agreement insofar as they have an effect on the processing of personal data under the draft agreement . Taking into account that the draft agreement provides the legal basis for further cooperation, the Opinion also provides recommendations for future decisions or agreements requiring the exchange of personal data that may be adopted on the basis of the draft agreement .
Conclusion of the EDPS:
Although the EDPS welcomes the reference to the applicability of the confidentiality and privacy requirements of the contracting parties and the reference to Article 16 of the CMAA, he makes certain recommendations regarding additions to the text of the draft agreement where possible or in future decisions or agreements adopted on the basis of the draft agreement:
clarifying that matters not falling within the common commercial policy should be excluded from the scope of the agreement; narrowing and better defining the scope of the exchanges of personal data ; specifying the categories of data to be exchanged ; as regards the processing of sensitive data , providing for adequate safeguards and subjecting the processing to prior check by EU national data protection authorities and the EDPS; guaranteeing to all data subjects the rights of access, rectification and effective judicial and administrative redress ; informing data subjects on the characteristics of the processing; requiring adequate security measures; mentioning that compliance with the contracting parties personal data protection law shall be supervised by EU national data protection authorities, the EDPS and Canada's privacy commissioners; consulting the EDPS on further JCCC decisions regarding the processing of personal data.
PURPOSE: to conclude the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 207(4) first subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
CONTENT: the customs relations between the EU and Canada are based on the Agreement on customs cooperation and mutual assistance in customs matters (CMAA) that entered into force on 1 January 1998.
In December 2005, the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) signalled its interest to move forward with closer cooperation between the EU and Canada on supply chain security. Following a series of exchanges of views, an agreement was found between the Commission and the CBSA on the possible scope of the new agreement expanding the EU-Canada customs cooperation.
On 26 November 2009, the Council adopted a decision authorising the Commission to open negotiations with Canada. The negotiations were launched in May 2011.
The negotiations have resulted in the draft Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security which builds on and expands the CMAA.
The aim of this proposal is to conclude this Agreement on behalf of the European Union.
CONTENT: by this draft Decision, the Commission proposes that the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security be approved on behalf of the Union.
Characteristics of the Agreement : the draft Agreement will establish a legal basis for EU-Canada customs cooperation on matters of supply chain security and risk management , including reinforcing the customs related aspects for securing the logistics chain of international trade while at the same time:
facilitating legitimate trade; establishing minimum standards, to the extent practicable, for risk management techniques and related requirements and programmes; working towards and, where appropriate, establishing mutual recognition of risk management techniques , risk standards, security controls, container security and trade partnership programmes including equivalent trade facilitation measures; exchanging information for supply chain security and risk management subject to the confidentiality of information and personal data protection requirements set out in Article 16 of the CMAA and in the relevant legislation of the Contracting Parties; establishing contact points for this purpose; introducing, where appropriate, an interface for data exchange, including for prearrival or pre-departure data; developing a strategy that allows the customs authorities to partner cooperatively in the area of cargo inspection; collaborating, to the extent practicable, in any multilateral fora where issues related to supply chain security may be appropriately raised and discussed.
The draft Agreement constitutes an expansion of the CMAA in line with Article 23 of the CMAA, which sets down that the Contracting Parties may expand the CMAA with a view to increasing the levels of customs cooperation and supplementing them by means of agreements on specific sectors or matters. The CMAA will remain the overall umbrella for customs cooperation between the Contracting Parties and the institutional set-up of the CMAA is proposed to be extended also to cover the draft Agreement. In practice, the EU-Canada Joint Customs Cooperation Committee (JCCC), established under
Article 20 of the CMAA, will administer both agreements and will be empowered to adopt the necessary implementing decisions in accordance with the respective domestic legislation of the Contracting Parties, e.g. on mutual recognition of risk management techniques, risk standards, security controls and trade partnership programmes.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: this proposal has no budgetary implications for the Union budget.
PURPOSE: to conclude the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 207(4) first subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
CONTENT: the customs relations between the EU and Canada are based on the Agreement on customs cooperation and mutual assistance in customs matters (CMAA) that entered into force on 1 January 1998.
In December 2005, the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) signalled its interest to move forward with closer cooperation between the EU and Canada on supply chain security. Following a series of exchanges of views, an agreement was found between the Commission and the CBSA on the possible scope of the new agreement expanding the EU-Canada customs cooperation.
On 26 November 2009, the Council adopted a decision authorising the Commission to open negotiations with Canada. The negotiations were launched in May 2011.
The negotiations have resulted in the draft Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security which builds on and expands the CMAA.
The aim of this proposal is to conclude this Agreement on behalf of the European Union.
CONTENT: by this draft Decision, the Commission proposes that the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security be approved on behalf of the Union.
Characteristics of the Agreement : the draft Agreement will establish a legal basis for EU-Canada customs cooperation on matters of supply chain security and risk management , including reinforcing the customs related aspects for securing the logistics chain of international trade while at the same time:
facilitating legitimate trade; establishing minimum standards, to the extent practicable, for risk management techniques and related requirements and programmes; working towards and, where appropriate, establishing mutual recognition of risk management techniques , risk standards, security controls, container security and trade partnership programmes including equivalent trade facilitation measures; exchanging information for supply chain security and risk management subject to the confidentiality of information and personal data protection requirements set out in Article 16 of the CMAA and in the relevant legislation of the Contracting Parties; establishing contact points for this purpose; introducing, where appropriate, an interface for data exchange, including for prearrival or pre-departure data; developing a strategy that allows the customs authorities to partner cooperatively in the area of cargo inspection; collaborating, to the extent practicable, in any multilateral fora where issues related to supply chain security may be appropriately raised and discussed.
The draft Agreement constitutes an expansion of the CMAA in line with Article 23 of the CMAA, which sets down that the Contracting Parties may expand the CMAA with a view to increasing the levels of customs cooperation and supplementing them by means of agreements on specific sectors or matters. The CMAA will remain the overall umbrella for customs cooperation between the Contracting Parties and the institutional set-up of the CMAA is proposed to be extended also to cover the draft Agreement. In practice, the EU-Canada Joint Customs Cooperation Committee (JCCC), established under
Article 20 of the CMAA, will administer both agreements and will be empowered to adopt the necessary implementing decisions in accordance with the respective domestic legislation of the Contracting Parties, e.g. on mutual recognition of risk management techniques, risk standards, security controls and trade partnership programmes.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: this proposal has no budgetary implications for the Union budget.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Decision 2014/941
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 367 23.12.2014, p. 0008
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0211/2013
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0152/2013
- Committee draft report: PE496.442
- Contribution: COM(2012)0144
- Legislative proposal: 11362/2012
- Document attached to the procedure: 11587/2012
- Legislative proposal published: 11362/2012
- Debate in Council: 3170
- Document attached to the procedure: OJ C 335 01.11.2012, p. 0006
- Document attached to the procedure: N7-0120/2012
- Preparatory document: COM(2012)0144
- Preparatory document: EUR-Lex
- Preparatory document: COM(2012)0144
- Preparatory document: EUR-Lex
- Preparatory document: COM(2012)0144 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: OJ C 335 01.11.2012, p. 0006 N7-0120/2012
- Legislative proposal: 11362/2012
- Document attached to the procedure: 11587/2012
- Committee draft report: PE496.442
- Contribution: COM(2012)0144
Activities
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0144/COM_COM(2012)0144_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0144/COM_COM(2012)0144_EN.pdf |
events/2/date |
Old
2012-06-26T00:00:00New
2012-06-25T00:00:00 |
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=NLE&year=2012&number=0073&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=NLE&year=2012&number=0073&appLng=EN |
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.442New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-PR-496442_EN.html |
events/3/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/4/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0152_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0152_EN.html |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-152&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0152_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-211New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0211_EN.html |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
INTA/7/09236New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32014D0941New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32014D0941 |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/title |
Old
EU/Canada Agreement: customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain securityNew
EU/Canada Agreement: customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012PC0144:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012PC0144:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0144/COM_COM(2012)0144_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0144/COM_COM(2012)0144_EN.pdf |
activities/10/text |
|
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
procedure/subject/0 |
Old
2.10.01 Customs Union, tax and duty-free, Community transitNew
2.10.01 Customs union, tax and duty-free, Community transit |
activities/10 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
activities/3/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1888e0fb8127435bdc371New
4f1adb95b819f207b30000d1 |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de185ae0fb8127435bdbf4aNew
4f1ac941b819f25efd000123 |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de1884b0fb8127435bdc307New
4f1adbb2b819f207b30000db |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de1889e0fb8127435bdc386New
4f1adb31b819f207b30000af |
activities/4/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1888e0fb8127435bdc371New
4f1adb95b819f207b30000d1 |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de185ae0fb8127435bdbf4aNew
4f1ac941b819f25efd000123 |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de1884b0fb8127435bdc307New
4f1adbb2b819f207b30000db |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de1889e0fb8127435bdc386New
4f1adb31b819f207b30000af |
activities/5/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1888e0fb8127435bdc371New
4f1adb95b819f207b30000d1 |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de185ae0fb8127435bdbf4aNew
4f1ac941b819f25efd000123 |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de1884b0fb8127435bdc307New
4f1adbb2b819f207b30000db |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de1889e0fb8127435bdc386New
4f1adb31b819f207b30000af |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1888e0fb8127435bdc371New
4f1adb95b819f207b30000d1 |
committees/1/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de185ae0fb8127435bdbf4aNew
4f1ac941b819f25efd000123 |
committees/1/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de1884b0fb8127435bdc307New
4f1adbb2b819f207b30000db |
committees/1/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de1889e0fb8127435bdc386New
4f1adb31b819f207b30000af |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/5/committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
committees/1/shadows/2/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
GUE/NGL |
activities/3/committees/1/date |
2012-05-29T00:00:00
|
activities/3/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/3/committees/1/shadows |
|
activities/4/committees/1/date |
2012-05-29T00:00:00
|
activities/4/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/4/committees/1/shadows |
|
activities/5/committees/1/date |
2012-05-29T00:00:00
|
activities/5/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/5/committees/1/shadows |
|
committees/1/date |
2012-05-29T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/shadows |
|
activities/3/committees/1/date |
2012-05-29T00:00:00
|
activities/3/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/3/committees/1/shadows |
|
activities/4/committees/1/date |
2012-05-29T00:00:00
|
activities/4/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/4/committees/1/shadows |
|
activities/5/committees/1/date |
2012-05-29T00:00:00
|
activities/5/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/5/committees/1/shadows |
|
committees/1/date |
2012-05-29T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/shadows |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
activities/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=Advanced&cmsid=639&ff_COTE_DOCUMENT=11362%2F12&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=100New
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=11362%2F12&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/text |
|
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/text |
|
activities/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&lang=EN&typ=Advanced&cmsid=639&ff_COTE_DOCUMENT=11362%2F12&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=100New
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=Advanced&cmsid=639&ff_COTE_DOCUMENT=11362%2F12&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=100 |
activities/6/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&typ=Simple&cmsid=638&ff_COTE_DOCUMENT=&ff_TITRE=&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=400&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&single_comparator=%3D&from_date=&to_date=&lang=EN&ff_FT_TEXT=3170&dd_DATE_REUNION=31/05/2012&single_date=31/05/2012New
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&ff_FT_TEXT=3170&dd_DATE_REUNION=31/05/2012&single_date=31/05/2012 |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Initial legislative proposalNew
Initial legislative proposal published |
activities/1 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012PC0144:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012PC0144:EN
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
procedure/subject/2 |
Old
6.20.04 Community Customs Code, tariffs, preferential arrangements, rules of originNew
6.20.04 Union Customs Code, tariffs, preferential arrangements, rules of origin |
procedure/?!oeil-proposed_legal_basis!? |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
procedure/?!oeil-proposed_legal_basis!? |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
procedure/instrument |
Decision
|
activities/9/docs/1 |
|
activities/10 |
|
activities/11 |
|
activities/12 |
|
other/0 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting final decisionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/text |
|
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/text |
|
activities/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&typ=Advanced&cmsid=639&ff_COTE_DOCUMENT=&ff_COTE_DOSSIER_INST=&ff_TITRE=&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=&dd_DATE_DOCUMENT=&document_date_single_comparator=&document_date_single_date=&document_date_from_date=&document_date_to_date=&meeting_date_single_comparator=%3D&meeting_date_from_date=&meeting_date_to_date=&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=100&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&lang=EN&ff_FT_TEXT=3170&dd_DATE_REUNION=31/05/2012&meeting_date_single_date=31/05/2012New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&typ=Simple&cmsid=638&ff_COTE_DOCUMENT=&ff_TITRE=&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=400&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&single_comparator=%3D&from_date=&to_date=&lang=EN&ff_FT_TEXT=3170&dd_DATE_REUNION=31/05/2012&meeting_date_single_date=31/05/2012 |
activities/0/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
PURPOSE: to conclude the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security. PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision. LEGAL BASIS: Article 207(4) first subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). CONTENT: the customs relations between the EU and Canada are based on the Agreement on customs cooperation and mutual assistance in customs matters (CMAA) that entered into force on 1 January 1998. In December 2005, the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) signalled its interest to move forward with closer cooperation between the EU and Canada on supply chain security. Following a series of exchanges of views, an agreement was found between the Commission and the CBSA on the possible scope of the new agreement expanding the EU-Canada customs cooperation. On 26 November 2009, the Council adopted a decision authorising the Commission to open negotiations with Canada. The negotiations were launched in May 2011. The negotiations have resulted in the draft Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security which builds on and expands the CMAA. The aim of this proposal is to conclude this Agreement on behalf of the European Union. CONTENT: by this draft Decision, the Commission proposes that the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security be approved on behalf of the Union. Characteristics of the Agreement: the draft Agreement will establish a legal basis for EU-Canada customs cooperation on matters of supply chain security and risk management, including reinforcing the customs related aspects for securing the logistics chain of international trade while at the same time:
The draft Agreement constitutes an expansion of the CMAA in line with Article 23 of the CMAA, which sets down that the Contracting Parties may expand the CMAA with a view to increasing the levels of customs cooperation and supplementing them by means of agreements on specific sectors or matters. The CMAA will remain the overall umbrella for customs cooperation between the Contracting Parties and the institutional set-up of the CMAA is proposed to be extended also to cover the draft Agreement. In practice, the EU-Canada Joint Customs Cooperation Committee (JCCC), established under Article 20 of the CMAA, will administer both agreements and will be empowered to adopt the necessary implementing decisions in accordance with the respective domestic legislation of the Contracting Parties, e.g. on mutual recognition of risk management techniques, risk standards, security controls and trade partnership programmes. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: this proposal has no budgetary implications for the Union budget. New
PURPOSE: to conclude the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security. PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision. LEGAL BASIS: Article 207(4) first subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). CONTENT: the customs relations between the EU and Canada are based on the Agreement on customs cooperation and mutual assistance in customs matters (CMAA) that entered into force on 1 January 1998. In December 2005, the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) signalled its interest to move forward with closer cooperation between the EU and Canada on supply chain security. Following a series of exchanges of views, an agreement was found between the Commission and the CBSA on the possible scope of the new agreement expanding the EU-Canada customs cooperation. On 26 November 2009, the Council adopted a decision authorising the Commission to open negotiations with Canada. The negotiations were launched in May 2011. The negotiations have resulted in the draft Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security which builds on and expands the CMAA. The aim of this proposal is to conclude this Agreement on behalf of the European Union. CONTENT: by this draft Decision, the Commission proposes that the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security be approved on behalf of the Union. Characteristics of the Agreement: the draft Agreement will establish a legal basis for EU-Canada customs cooperation on matters of supply chain security and risk management, including reinforcing the customs related aspects for securing the logistics chain of international trade while at the same time:
The draft Agreement constitutes an expansion of the CMAA in line with Article 23 of the CMAA, which sets down that the Contracting Parties may expand the CMAA with a view to increasing the levels of customs cooperation and supplementing them by means of agreements on specific sectors or matters. The CMAA will remain the overall umbrella for customs cooperation between the Contracting Parties and the institutional set-up of the CMAA is proposed to be extended also to cover the draft Agreement. In practice, the EU-Canada Joint Customs Cooperation Committee (JCCC), established under Article 20 of the CMAA, will administer both agreements and will be empowered to adopt the necessary implementing decisions in accordance with the respective domestic legislation of the Contracting Parties, e.g. on mutual recognition of risk management techniques, risk standards, security controls and trade partnership programmes. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: this proposal has no budgetary implications for the Union budget. |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/text |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
activities/9/docs/0/text |
|
activities/9/docs |
|
activities/9/type |
Old
Vote scheduledNew
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting final decision |
activities/8/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
The Committee on International Trade unanimously adopted the recommendation by Peter ŤASTNÝ (PPE, SK) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply-chain security. The committee recommends the European Parliament to give its consent to the conclusion of the Agreement which seeks to reinforce the customs related aspects for securing the logistics chain of international trade - including container security - while at the same time facilitating legitimate trade. New
The Committee on International Trade unanimously adopted the recommendation by Peter ŤASTNÝ (EPP, SK) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply-chain security. The committee recommends the European Parliament to give its consent to the conclusion of the Agreement which seeks to reinforce the customs related aspects for securing the logistics chain of international trade - including container security - while at the same time facilitating legitimate trade. |
activities/9/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote scheduled |
activities/8/docs/0/text |
|
activities/9/type |
Old
Vote scheduledNew
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/8/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-152&language=EN
|
activities/8 |
|
activities/7/committees |
|
activities/7/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/3/docs/0/text |
|
activities/4/docs/0/text |
|
activities/8/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote scheduled |
activities/6 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
INTA/7/09236
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/7/date |
Old
2013-05-21T00:00:00New
2013-05-22T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
PURPOSE: to conclude the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security. PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision. LEGAL BASIS: Article 207(4) first subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). CONTENT: the customs relations between the EU and Canada are based on the Agreement on customs cooperation and mutual assistance in customs matters (CMAA) that entered into force on 1 January 1998. In December 2005, the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) signalled its interest to move forward with closer cooperation between the EU and Canada on supply chain security. Following a series of exchanges of views, an agreement was found between the Commission and the CBSA on the possible scope of the new agreement expanding the EU-Canada customs cooperation. On 26 November 2009, the Council adopted a decision authorising the Commission to open negotiations with Canada. The negotiations were launched in May 2011. The negotiations have resulted in the draft Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security which builds on and expands the CMAA. The aim of this proposal is to conclude this Agreement on behalf of the European Union. CONTENT: by this draft Decision, the Commission proposes that the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security be approved on behalf of the Union. Characteristics of the Agreement: the draft Agreement will establish a legal basis for EU-Canada customs cooperation on matters of supply chain security and risk management, including reinforcing the customs related aspects for securing the logistics chain of international trade while at the same time:
The draft Agreement constitutes an expansion of the CMAA in line with Article 23 of the CMAA, which sets down that the Contracting Parties may expand the CMAA with a view to increasing the levels of customs cooperation and supplementing them by means of agreements on specific sectors or matters. The CMAA will remain the overall umbrella for customs cooperation between the Contracting Parties and the institutional set-up of the CMAA is proposed to be extended also to cover the draft Agreement. In practice, the EU-Canada Joint Customs Cooperation Committee (JCCC), established under Article 20 of the CMAA, will administer both agreements and will be empowered to adopt the necessary implementing decisions in accordance with the respective domestic legislation of the Contracting Parties, e.g. on mutual recognition of risk management techniques, risk standards, security controls and trade partnership programmes. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: this proposal has no budgetary implications for the Union budget. New
PURPOSE: to conclude the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security. PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision. LEGAL BASIS: Article 207(4) first subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). CONTENT: the customs relations between the EU and Canada are based on the Agreement on customs cooperation and mutual assistance in customs matters (CMAA) that entered into force on 1 January 1998. In December 2005, the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) signalled its interest to move forward with closer cooperation between the EU and Canada on supply chain security. Following a series of exchanges of views, an agreement was found between the Commission and the CBSA on the possible scope of the new agreement expanding the EU-Canada customs cooperation. On 26 November 2009, the Council adopted a decision authorising the Commission to open negotiations with Canada. The negotiations were launched in May 2011. The negotiations have resulted in the draft Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security which builds on and expands the CMAA. The aim of this proposal is to conclude this Agreement on behalf of the European Union. CONTENT: by this draft Decision, the Commission proposes that the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security be approved on behalf of the Union. Characteristics of the Agreement: the draft Agreement will establish a legal basis for EU-Canada customs cooperation on matters of supply chain security and risk management, including reinforcing the customs related aspects for securing the logistics chain of international trade while at the same time:
The draft Agreement constitutes an expansion of the CMAA in line with Article 23 of the CMAA, which sets down that the Contracting Parties may expand the CMAA with a view to increasing the levels of customs cooperation and supplementing them by means of agreements on specific sectors or matters. The CMAA will remain the overall umbrella for customs cooperation between the Contracting Parties and the institutional set-up of the CMAA is proposed to be extended also to cover the draft Agreement. In practice, the EU-Canada Joint Customs Cooperation Committee (JCCC), established under Article 20 of the CMAA, will administer both agreements and will be empowered to adopt the necessary implementing decisions in accordance with the respective domestic legislation of the Contracting Parties, e.g. on mutual recognition of risk management techniques, risk standards, security controls and trade partnership programmes. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: this proposal has no budgetary implications for the Union budget. |
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
Legislative proposal publishedNew
Initial legislative proposal published |
activities/0/type |
Old
Legislative proposalNew
Initial legislative proposal |
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2013-03-20T00:00:00New
2013-04-25T00:00:00 |
activities/5/date |
Old
2013-04-16T00:00:00New
2013-05-21T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
PURPOSE: to conclude the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security. PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision. LEGAL BASIS: Article 207(4) first subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). CONTENT: the customs relations between the EU and Canada are based on the Agreement on customs cooperation and mutual assistance in customs matters (CMAA) that entered into force on 1 January 1998. In December 2005, the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) signalled its interest to move forward with closer cooperation between the EU and Canada on supply chain security. Following a series of exchanges of views, an agreement was found between the Commission and the CBSA on the possible scope of the new agreement expanding the EU-Canada customs cooperation. On 26 November 2009, the Council adopted a decision authorising the Commission to open negotiations with Canada. The negotiations were launched in May 2011. The negotiations have resulted in the draft Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security which builds on and expands the CMAA. The aim of this proposal is to conclude this Agreement on behalf of the European Union. CONTENT: by this draft Decision, the Commission proposes that the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security be approved on behalf of the Union. Characteristics of the Agreement: the draft Agreement will establish a legal basis for EU-Canada customs cooperation on matters of supply chain security and risk management, including reinforcing the customs related aspects for securing the logistics chain of international trade while at the same time:
The draft Agreement constitutes an expansion of the CMAA in line with Article 23 of the CMAA, which sets down that the Contracting Parties may expand the CMAA with a view to increasing the levels of customs cooperation and supplementing them by means of agreements on specific sectors or matters. The CMAA will remain the overall umbrella for customs cooperation between the Contracting Parties and the institutional set-up of the CMAA is proposed to be extended also to cover the draft Agreement. In practice, the EU-Canada Joint Customs Cooperation Committee (JCCC), established under Article 20 of the CMAA, will administer both agreements and will be empowered to adopt the necessary implementing decisions in accordance with the respective domestic legislation of the Contracting Parties, e.g. on mutual recognition of risk management techniques, risk standards, security controls and trade partnership programmes. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: this proposal has no budgetary implications for the Union budget. New
PURPOSE: to conclude the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security. PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision. LEGAL BASIS: Article 207(4) first subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). CONTENT: the customs relations between the EU and Canada are based on the Agreement on customs cooperation and mutual assistance in customs matters (CMAA) that entered into force on 1 January 1998. In December 2005, the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) signalled its interest to move forward with closer cooperation between the EU and Canada on supply chain security. Following a series of exchanges of views, an agreement was found between the Commission and the CBSA on the possible scope of the new agreement expanding the EU-Canada customs cooperation. On 26 November 2009, the Council adopted a decision authorising the Commission to open negotiations with Canada. The negotiations were launched in May 2011. The negotiations have resulted in the draft Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security which builds on and expands the CMAA. The aim of this proposal is to conclude this Agreement on behalf of the European Union. CONTENT: by this draft Decision, the Commission proposes that the Agreement between the European Union and Canada on customs cooperation with respect to matters related to supply chain security be approved on behalf of the Union. Characteristics of the Agreement: the draft Agreement will establish a legal basis for EU-Canada customs cooperation on matters of supply chain security and risk management, including reinforcing the customs related aspects for securing the logistics chain of international trade while at the same time:
The draft Agreement constitutes an expansion of the CMAA in line with Article 23 of the CMAA, which sets down that the Contracting Parties may expand the CMAA with a view to increasing the levels of customs cooperation and supplementing them by means of agreements on specific sectors or matters. The CMAA will remain the overall umbrella for customs cooperation between the Contracting Parties and the institutional set-up of the CMAA is proposed to be extended also to cover the draft Agreement. In practice, the EU-Canada Joint Customs Cooperation Committee (JCCC), established under Article 20 of the CMAA, will administer both agreements and will be empowered to adopt the necessary implementing decisions in accordance with the respective domestic legislation of the Contracting Parties, e.g. on mutual recognition of risk management techniques, risk standards, security controls and trade partnership programmes. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: this proposal has no budgetary implications for the Union budget. |
activities/1/docs/1/text/0 |
Old
Executive summary of the Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Canada with respect to matters related to supply chain security. The EDPS recalls that relations between the EU and Canada in the area of customs are based on the Agreement on customs cooperation and mutual assistance in customs matters (CMAA) of 1998, which allows the contracting parties to expand the agreement to increase customs cooperation. On 28 March 2012, the Commission adopted a proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Canada with respect to matters related to supply chain security. The proposal was sent to the EDPS on the same day. The proposal aims at expanding the CMAA through a new, complementary agreement and at establishing a legal basis for EU-Canada customs cooperation on matters of supply chain security and related risk management. The draft agreement also aims at providing a legal basis for the exchange of information. While the exchange of personal data is not the main aim of the proposal, significant exchanges of personal data will take place, especially related to operators. The EDPS Opinion analyses (i) how the exchange of such personal data is regulated in the draft agreement; (ii) relevant provisions of the CMAA agreement insofar as they have an effect on the processing of personal data under the draft agreement. Aim of the EDPS Opinion: according to the proposal, the draft agreement also aims at providing a legal basis for the exchange of information. While the exchange of personal data is not the main aim of the proposal, significant exchanges of personal data will take place, especially related to operators. The present Opinion will analyse how the exchange of such personal data is regulated in the draft agreement. The Opinion will also analyse the relevant provisions of the CMAA agreement insofar as they have an effect on the processing of personal data under the draft agreement. Taking into account that the draft agreement provides the legal basis for further cooperation, the Opinion also provides recommendations for future decisions or agreements requiring the exchange of personal data that may be adopted on the basis of the draft agreement. Conclusion of the EDPS: Although the EDPS welcomes the reference to the applicability of the confidentiality and privacy requirements of the contracting parties and the reference to Article 16 of the CMAA, he makes certain recommendations regarding additions to the text of the draft agreement where possible or in future decisions or agreements adopted on the basis of the draft agreement:
New
Executive summary of the Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Canada with respect to matters related to supply chain security. The EDPS recalls that relations between the EU and Canada in the area of customs are based on the Agreement on customs cooperation and mutual assistance in customs matters (CMAA) of 1998, which allows the contracting parties to expand the agreement to increase customs cooperation. On 28 March 2012, the Commission adopted a proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Canada with respect to matters related to supply chain security. The proposal was sent to the EDPS on the same day. The proposal aims at expanding the CMAA through a new, complementary agreement and at establishing a legal basis for EU-Canada customs cooperation on matters of supply chain security and related risk management. The draft agreement also aims at providing a legal basis for the exchange of information. While the exchange of personal data is not the main aim of the proposal, significant exchanges of personal data will take place, especially related to operators. The EDPS Opinion analyses (i) how the exchange of such personal data is regulated in the draft agreement; (ii) relevant provisions of the CMAA agreement insofar as they have an effect on the processing of personal data under the draft agreement. Aim of the EDPS Opinion: according to the proposal, the draft agreement also aims at providing a legal basis for the exchange of information. While the exchange of personal data is not the main aim of the proposal, significant exchanges of personal data will take place, especially related to operators. The present Opinion will analyse how the exchange of such personal data is regulated in the draft agreement. The Opinion will also analyse the relevant provisions of the CMAA agreement insofar as they have an effect on the processing of personal data under the draft agreement. Taking into account that the draft agreement provides the legal basis for further cooperation, the Opinion also provides recommendations for future decisions or agreements requiring the exchange of personal data that may be adopted on the basis of the draft agreement. Conclusion of the EDPS: Although the EDPS welcomes the reference to the applicability of the confidentiality and privacy requirements of the contracting parties and the reference to Article 16 of the CMAA, he makes certain recommendations regarding additions to the text of the draft agreement where possible or in future decisions or agreements adopted on the basis of the draft agreement:
|
activities/2/text/0 |
Old
The Council discussed negotiations with Canada on a comprehensive economic and trade agreement. It addressed key outstanding issues, notably on rules of origin and intellectual property rights, with particular reference to pharmaceutical products. The Council was briefed by the Commission on progress achieved, especially in the areas of market access for goods, public procurement, services, dispute settlement and, to a lesser extent, sanitary and phytosanitary issues and investment protection. It took note of the Commission's assessment of the prospects for concluding the agreement in the near future, and called for full transparency in the final stages of the negotiations. New
The Council discussed negotiations with Canada on a comprehensive economic and trade agreement. It addressed key outstanding issues, notably on rules of origin and intellectual property rights, with particular reference to pharmaceutical products. The Council was briefed by the Commission on progress achieved, especially in the areas of market access for goods, public procurement, services, dispute settlement and, to a lesser extent, sanitary and phytosanitary issues and investment protection. It took note of the Commission's assessment of the prospects for concluding the agreement in the near future, and called for full transparency in the final stages of the negotiations. |
activities/4 |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2013-03-13T00:00:00New
2013-04-16T00:00:00 |
activities/4/date |
Old
2013-03-12T00:00:00New
2013-03-13T00:00:00 |
activities/4/date |
Old
2013-02-05T00:00:00New
2013-03-12T00:00:00 |
activities/4 |
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2012-11-08T00:00:00New
2012-03-28T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Deadline AmendmentsNew
Legislative proposal |
activities/3 |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2012-12-11T00:00:00New
2012-09-24T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
EP 1R PlenaryNew
Committee draft report |
activities/5 |
|
activities/7 |
|
activities/8 |
|
activities/1/docs/1/text |
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=144New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0144/COM_COM(2012)0144_EN.pdf |
activities/1 |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
EP 1R Committee |
activities/6/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
EP 1R Plenary |
activities/7 |
|
activities/8 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2012-11-06T00:00:00New
2012-11-08T00:00:00 |
activities/3/type |
Old
EP 1R CommitteeNew
Deadline Amendments |
activities/4 |
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2012-11-06T00:00:00New
2012-11-27T00:00:00 |
activities/3 |
|
activities/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.442
|
activities/2 |
|
committees/1/shadows |
|
activities/3 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
EPP |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de187020fb8127435bdc130New
4de1888e0fb8127435bdc371 |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
MOREIRA VitalNew
ŠŤASTNÝ Peter |
activities/2 |
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
activities/1/text |
|
activities/1 |
|
committees/1/date |
2012-05-29T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=144
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|