BETA


2012/2177(DEC) 2011 discharge: EU general budget, European Council

Progress: Procedure lapsed or withdrawn

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CONT ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea (icon: ECR ECR) DEUTSCH Tamás (icon: PPE PPE), SONIK Bogusław (icon: PPE PPE), KALFIN Ivailo (icon: S&D S&D), SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros (icon: ALDE ALDE), STAES Bart (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), ANDREASEN Marta (icon: EFD EFD), EHRENHAUSER Martin (icon: NA NA)
Committee Opinion AFET
Committee Opinion DEVE
Committee Opinion INTA
Committee Opinion BUDG
Committee Opinion ECON
Committee Opinion EMPL
Committee Opinion ENVI
Committee Opinion ITRE
Committee Opinion IMCO
Committee Opinion TRAN
Committee Opinion REGI
Committee Opinion AGRI
Committee Opinion PECH
Committee Opinion CULT
Committee Opinion JURI
Committee Opinion LIBE
Committee Opinion AFCO
Committee Opinion FEMM
Committee Opinion PETI
Lead committee dossier:

Events

2012/09/13
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2012/09/06
   CofA - Court of Auditors: opinion, report
Details

OBJECTIVE: presentation of the Report of the Court of Auditors on the 2011 budget (section II – European Council).

CONTENT: the Court of Auditors published its 35th Annual Report on the implementation of the EU budget for the 2011 financial year .

In accordance with the tasks and objectives conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, it provides under the discharge procedure, for both the European Parliament and European Council, a statement of assurance (“DAS”) about the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the transactions of each institution, body or agency of the EU, based on an independent external audit.

The audit also focused on the budget implementation of the European Council.

On the basis of its audit work, the Court considers that payments for “Administrative and other expenditure” policy are, overall, significantly error-free. The estimated error rate is 0.1 %.

The Court, however, draws attention to the errors and weaknesses which did not affect the Court’s conclusion. The Court examined a sample of procurement procedures and noted several weaknesses in the application of selection and award criteria, some of which had an impact on the results of the procedure. Other weaknesses relate to the organisation of cross border competition, to the management of automatic award procedures and to the respect of provisions as regards the drafting and filing of tendering documents.

The Court therefore recommended that the institutions and bodies of the EU took steps ensure that authorising officers improve the design, coordination and performance of procurement procedures through appropriate checks and better guidance.

The Court also made a number of comments specific to each institution or body of the European Union. These observations do not affect the positive overall appraisal given that they do not significantly affect overall administrative expenditure.

In the specific case of the audit of the European Council, the Court noted in particular the following points:

· procurement: five procurement procedures were examined. In two cases relating to cleaning services and to the purchase of service clothing and shoes, if tenderers did not propose a price for certain items of the tender, tender specifications enabled the European Council to estimate a price based on the average price submitted for this item by the other tenderers. The European Council thus modifies the value of the tender in a way which is not laid down in the Financial Regulation.

2012/07/25
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011, as part of the 2011 discharge procedure.

Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: Council and European Council .

Legal reminder: the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the year 2011 have been prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions and bodies under Article 129.2 of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union. They were prepared in accordance with Title VII of this Financial Regulation and with the accounting principles, rules and methods set out in the notes to the financial statements.

The objective of the financial statements is to provide information about the financial position, performance and cashflows of an entity that is useful to a wide range of users. The objective is to provide information useful for decision making, and to demonstrate the accountability of the entity for the resources entrusted to it.

1) Purpose: the document helps to bring insight into the EU budget mechanism and the way in which the budget has been managed and spent in 2011 . It recalls that the European Union's operational expenditure covers the various headings of the financial framework and takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed. In accordance with the Financial Regulation, the Commission implements the general budget using the following methods: direct or indirect centralised management (by means of bodies or agencies of public law or other); decentralised management where the Commission delegates certain tasks for the implementation of the budget to third countries; and, thirdly, shared management where budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States, in areas such as agricultural expenditure and structural actions.

The document also presents the different financial actors involved in the budget process (accounting officers, internal officers and authorising officers) and recalls their respective roles in the context of the tasks of sound financial management.

Amongst the other legal elements relating to the implementation of the EU budget presented in this document, the paper focuses on the following issues:

accounting principles applicable to the management of EU spending (business continuity, consistency of accounting methods, comparability of information ...); consolidation methods of figures for all major controlled entities (the consolidated financial statements of the EU comprise all significant controlled entities –institutions, organisations and agencies, this being 50 controlled entities, 5 joint ventures and 4 associates. In comparison with 2010, the scope of consolidation has been extended by 7 controlled entities (one institution, 6 agencies); the recognition of financial assets in the EU (tangible and intangible assets, financial assets and other miscellaneous investments); the way in which EU public expenditure is committed and spent, including pre-financing (cash advances intended for the benefit of an EU organ); the means of recovery following irregularities detected; the modus operandi of the accounting system; the audit process followed by the European Parliament's granting of the discharge.

To recap, the final control is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year . The discharge represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. When granting the discharge, Parliament may highlight some observations that it considers important, often by recommending that the Commission takes action on the aspects in question .

The document also details specific expenditure of the institutions, in particular: i) pensions of former Members and functionaries of institutions; ii) joint sickness insurance scheme and iii) buildings.

Lastly, the document presents a series of tables and detailed technical indicators on (i) the balance sheet; (ii) the economic outturn account; (iii) cashflow tables; (iv) technical annexes concerning the financial statements.

2) Implementation of appropriations under Section II of the budget for the financial year 2011: the document comprises a series of detailed tables, the most important concerning the implementation of the budget. Concerning the Council's expenditure, the table on the financial and budgetary implementation of this institution is presented as follows (information drawn from the Financial Activity Report 2011 (Section II - European Council and Council) .

Budget 2011: the European Council and Council budget 2011 was established at EUR 563.3 million . At the end of the financial year 2011 an amount of EUR 506.8 million was committed (corresponding to an implementation rate of 90 %).

The main reasons for the under spending of EUR 56.4 million are:

under-spending of the delegations' travel envelopes (EUR 20.9 million); under-occupation of the establishment plan and lower salary costs (EUR 9.1 million); the lower need for organising meetings, technical installations and office equipment (EUR 6.8 million); the lower need for interpretation (EUR 6 million); non activation of the reserve (EUR 6 million); fewer needs for other staff expenditure (e.g. contractual agents, seconded national experts, other outside services) (EUR 4.7 million); fewer needs in fitting-out works in the Council buildings (EUR 2.2 million).

N.B.: the 2011 budget for the European Council and Council was drawn up with the goal of not increasing payments in real terms, with the exception of preparing for the accession of Croatia. The Secretary General of the Council has not introduced any demands for new staff, except for the Cabinet of the President of the European Council . This position indicates that new initiatives and the need for supplementary resources will be covered by reductions in other areas.

Appropriations carried over: the implementation of amounts carried over from 2010 to 2011 totalled EUR 40.2 million out of EUR 49.8 million. The objective remains to further increase the implementation of the carried over amounts.

Revenue: The General Secretariat of the Council (GSC)'s revenue operations in 2011 amounted to EUR 128.6 million. From this amount EUR 117.5 million was recovered during the financial year while the rest will be recovered in 2012. More than half (EUR 62.4 million, or 53 %) of these recovered revenues are related to the Community taxes, levies and dues which were collected from the GSC's staff in 2011.

3) Budgetary implementation - conclusions: the main characteristics of the Council’s budgetary implementation for the financial year 2011 was chiefly marked by:

EEAS: the creation of the European External Action Service (EEAS), as foreseen in the Treaty of Lisbon, reduced the expenditure foreseen for the functioning of the European Council and the Council. A letter of amendment to the draft budget for the financial year 2011 for the European Council and Council reduced the resources of section II by 411 establishment plan posts and EUR 79.7 million in terms of appropriations. These resources and related activities were transferred as the Council's contribution to the establishment of the EEAS; Council administrative modernisation process: the GSC continued the process of its administrative modernisation. In this context, the GSC transferred its Sickness Insurance Antenne to the Paymaster Office (PMO of the Commission; Progress of construction projects: the project for the Europa Building passed from the consolidation phase to the actual construction work. Note that the project foresees the renovation of the Résidence Palace to act as the seat of the European Council.

2012/02/29
   EP - ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in CONT

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
rapporteur
name: ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea date: 2012-02-29T00:00:00 group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2012-02-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
shadows
committees/6/date
    activities
    • date: 2012-07-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0436/COM_COM(2012)0436_EN.pdf title: COM(2012)0436 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52012DC0436:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas type: Non-legislative basic document published
    • date: 2012-09-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: DEUTSCH Tamás group: PPE name: SONIK Bogusław group: S&D name: KALFIN Ivailo group: ALDE name: SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo group: EFD name: ANDREASEN Marta group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2012-02-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: ECR name: ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
    commission
    • body: EC dg: Budget commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
    committees/0
    type
    Responsible Committee
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Budgetary Control
    committee
    CONT
    date
    2012-02-29T00:00:00
    rapporteur
    name: ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
    shadows
    committees/0
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Constitutional Affairs
    committee
    AFCO
    committees/1
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Foreign Affairs
    committee
    AFET
    opinion
    False
    committees/1
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Foreign Affairs
    committee
    AFET
    committees/2
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Development
    committee
    DEVE
    opinion
    False
    committees/2
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Agriculture and Rural Development
    committee
    AGRI
    committees/3
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    International Trade
    committee
    INTA
    opinion
    False
    committees/3
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Budgets
    committee
    BUDG
    committees/4
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Budgets
    committee
    BUDG
    opinion
    False
    committees/4
    body
    EP
    shadows
    responsible
    True
    committee
    CONT
    date
    2012-02-29T00:00:00
    committee_full
    Budgetary Control
    rapporteur
    group: ECR name: ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea
    committees/5
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Economic and Monetary Affairs
    committee
    ECON
    opinion
    False
    committees/5
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Culture and Education
    committee
    CULT
    committees/6
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Employment and Social Affairs
    committee
    EMPL
    date
    committees/6
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Development
    committee
    DEVE
    committees/7
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
    committee
    ENVI
    opinion
    False
    committees/7
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Economic and Monetary Affairs
    committee
    ECON
    committees/8
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Industry, Research and Energy
    committee
    ITRE
    opinion
    False
    committees/8
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Employment and Social Affairs
    committee
    EMPL
    committees/9
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Internal Market and Consumer Protection
    committee
    IMCO
    opinion
    False
    committees/9
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
    committee
    ENVI
    committees/10
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Transport and Tourism
    committee
    TRAN
    opinion
    False
    committees/10
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Women's Rights and Gender Equality
    committee
    FEMM
    committees/11
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Regional Development
    committee
    REGI
    opinion
    False
    committees/11
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Internal Market and Consumer Protection
    committee
    IMCO
    committees/12
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Agriculture and Rural Development
    committee
    AGRI
    opinion
    False
    committees/12
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    International Trade
    committee
    INTA
    committees/13
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Fisheries
    committee
    PECH
    opinion
    False
    committees/13
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Industry, Research and Energy
    committee
    ITRE
    committees/14
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Culture and Education
    committee
    CULT
    opinion
    False
    committees/14
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Legal Affairs
    committee
    JURI
    committees/15
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Legal Affairs
    committee
    JURI
    opinion
    False
    committees/15
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
    committee
    LIBE
    committees/16
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
    committee
    LIBE
    opinion
    False
    committees/16
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Fisheries
    committee
    PECH
    committees/17
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Constitutional Affairs
    committee
    AFCO
    opinion
    False
    committees/17
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Petitions
    committee
    PETI
    committees/18
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Women's Rights and Gender Equality
    committee
    FEMM
    opinion
    False
    committees/18
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Regional Development
    committee
    REGI
    committees/19
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Petitions
    committee
    PETI
    opinion
    False
    committees/19
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Transport and Tourism
    committee
    TRAN
    docs
    • date: 2012-09-06T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2012:344:TOC title: OJ C 344 12.11.2012, p. 0001 title: N7-0127/2012 summary: OBJECTIVE: presentation of the Report of the Court of Auditors on the 2011 budget (section II – European Council). CONTENT: the Court of Auditors published its 35th Annual Report on the implementation of the EU budget for the 2011 financial year . In accordance with the tasks and objectives conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, it provides under the discharge procedure, for both the European Parliament and European Council, a statement of assurance (“DAS”) about the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the transactions of each institution, body or agency of the EU, based on an independent external audit. The audit also focused on the budget implementation of the European Council. On the basis of its audit work, the Court considers that payments for “Administrative and other expenditure” policy are, overall, significantly error-free. The estimated error rate is 0.1 %. The Court, however, draws attention to the errors and weaknesses which did not affect the Court’s conclusion. The Court examined a sample of procurement procedures and noted several weaknesses in the application of selection and award criteria, some of which had an impact on the results of the procedure. Other weaknesses relate to the organisation of cross border competition, to the management of automatic award procedures and to the respect of provisions as regards the drafting and filing of tendering documents. The Court therefore recommended that the institutions and bodies of the EU took steps ensure that authorising officers improve the design, coordination and performance of procurement procedures through appropriate checks and better guidance. The Court also made a number of comments specific to each institution or body of the European Union. These observations do not affect the positive overall appraisal given that they do not significantly affect overall administrative expenditure. In the specific case of the audit of the European Council, the Court noted in particular the following points: · procurement: five procurement procedures were examined. In two cases relating to cleaning services and to the purchase of service clothing and shoes, if tenderers did not propose a price for certain items of the tender, tender specifications enabled the European Council to estimate a price based on the average price submitted for this item by the other tenderers. The European Council thus modifies the value of the tender in a way which is not laid down in the Financial Regulation. type: Court of Auditors: opinion, report body: CofA
    events
    • date: 2012-07-25T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0436/COM_COM(2012)0436_EN.pdf title: COM(2012)0436 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=436 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011, as part of the 2011 discharge procedure. Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: Council and European Council . Legal reminder: the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the year 2011 have been prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions and bodies under Article 129.2 of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union. They were prepared in accordance with Title VII of this Financial Regulation and with the accounting principles, rules and methods set out in the notes to the financial statements. The objective of the financial statements is to provide information about the financial position, performance and cashflows of an entity that is useful to a wide range of users. The objective is to provide information useful for decision making, and to demonstrate the accountability of the entity for the resources entrusted to it. 1) Purpose: the document helps to bring insight into the EU budget mechanism and the way in which the budget has been managed and spent in 2011 . It recalls that the European Union's operational expenditure covers the various headings of the financial framework and takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed. In accordance with the Financial Regulation, the Commission implements the general budget using the following methods: direct or indirect centralised management (by means of bodies or agencies of public law or other); decentralised management where the Commission delegates certain tasks for the implementation of the budget to third countries; and, thirdly, shared management where budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States, in areas such as agricultural expenditure and structural actions. The document also presents the different financial actors involved in the budget process (accounting officers, internal officers and authorising officers) and recalls their respective roles in the context of the tasks of sound financial management. Amongst the other legal elements relating to the implementation of the EU budget presented in this document, the paper focuses on the following issues: accounting principles applicable to the management of EU spending (business continuity, consistency of accounting methods, comparability of information ...); consolidation methods of figures for all major controlled entities (the consolidated financial statements of the EU comprise all significant controlled entities –institutions, organisations and agencies, this being 50 controlled entities, 5 joint ventures and 4 associates. In comparison with 2010, the scope of consolidation has been extended by 7 controlled entities (one institution, 6 agencies); the recognition of financial assets in the EU (tangible and intangible assets, financial assets and other miscellaneous investments); the way in which EU public expenditure is committed and spent, including pre-financing (cash advances intended for the benefit of an EU organ); the means of recovery following irregularities detected; the modus operandi of the accounting system; the audit process followed by the European Parliament's granting of the discharge. To recap, the final control is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year . The discharge represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. When granting the discharge, Parliament may highlight some observations that it considers important, often by recommending that the Commission takes action on the aspects in question . The document also details specific expenditure of the institutions, in particular: i) pensions of former Members and functionaries of institutions; ii) joint sickness insurance scheme and iii) buildings. Lastly, the document presents a series of tables and detailed technical indicators on (i) the balance sheet; (ii) the economic outturn account; (iii) cashflow tables; (iv) technical annexes concerning the financial statements. 2) Implementation of appropriations under Section II of the budget for the financial year 2011: the document comprises a series of detailed tables, the most important concerning the implementation of the budget. Concerning the Council's expenditure, the table on the financial and budgetary implementation of this institution is presented as follows (information drawn from the Financial Activity Report 2011 (Section II - European Council and Council) . Budget 2011: the European Council and Council budget 2011 was established at EUR 563.3 million . At the end of the financial year 2011 an amount of EUR 506.8 million was committed (corresponding to an implementation rate of 90 %). The main reasons for the under spending of EUR 56.4 million are: under-spending of the delegations' travel envelopes (EUR 20.9 million); under-occupation of the establishment plan and lower salary costs (EUR 9.1 million); the lower need for organising meetings, technical installations and office equipment (EUR 6.8 million); the lower need for interpretation (EUR 6 million); non activation of the reserve (EUR 6 million); fewer needs for other staff expenditure (e.g. contractual agents, seconded national experts, other outside services) (EUR 4.7 million); fewer needs in fitting-out works in the Council buildings (EUR 2.2 million). N.B.: the 2011 budget for the European Council and Council was drawn up with the goal of not increasing payments in real terms, with the exception of preparing for the accession of Croatia. The Secretary General of the Council has not introduced any demands for new staff, except for the Cabinet of the President of the European Council . This position indicates that new initiatives and the need for supplementary resources will be covered by reductions in other areas. Appropriations carried over: the implementation of amounts carried over from 2010 to 2011 totalled EUR 40.2 million out of EUR 49.8 million. The objective remains to further increase the implementation of the carried over amounts. Revenue: The General Secretariat of the Council (GSC)'s revenue operations in 2011 amounted to EUR 128.6 million. From this amount EUR 117.5 million was recovered during the financial year while the rest will be recovered in 2012. More than half (EUR 62.4 million, or 53 %) of these recovered revenues are related to the Community taxes, levies and dues which were collected from the GSC's staff in 2011. 3) Budgetary implementation - conclusions: the main characteristics of the Council’s budgetary implementation for the financial year 2011 was chiefly marked by: EEAS: the creation of the European External Action Service (EEAS), as foreseen in the Treaty of Lisbon, reduced the expenditure foreseen for the functioning of the European Council and the Council. A letter of amendment to the draft budget for the financial year 2011 for the European Council and Council reduced the resources of section II by 411 establishment plan posts and EUR 79.7 million in terms of appropriations. These resources and related activities were transferred as the Council's contribution to the establishment of the EEAS; Council administrative modernisation process: the GSC continued the process of its administrative modernisation. In this context, the GSC transferred its Sickness Insurance Antenne to the Paymaster Office (PMO of the Commission; Progress of construction projects: the project for the Europa Building passed from the consolidation phase to the actual construction work. Note that the project foresees the renovation of the Résidence Palace to act as the seat of the European Council.
    • date: 2012-09-13T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
    links
    other
    • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    CONT/7/10483
    New
    • CONT/7/10483
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 8.70.03.06 2011 discharge
    New
    8.70.03.07
    Previous discharges
    activities/0/docs/0/celexid
    CELEX:52012DC0436:EN
    activities/0/docs/0/celexid
    CELEX:52012DC0436:EN
    activities/0/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0436/COM_COM(2012)0436_EN.pdf
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0436/COM_COM(2012)0436_EN.pdf
    activities/0/docs/0/text/0
    Old

    PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011, as part of the 2011 discharge procedure.

    Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: Council and European Council.

    Legal reminder: the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the year 2011 have been prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions and bodies under Article 129.2 of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union. They were prepared in accordance with Title VII of this Financial Regulation and with the accounting principles, rules and methods set out in the notes to the financial statements.

    The objective of the financial statements is to provide information about the financial position, performance and cashflows of an entity that is useful to a wide range of users. The objective is to provide information useful for decision making, and to demonstrate the accountability of the entity for the resources entrusted to it.

    1) Purpose: the document helps to bring insight into the EU budget mechanism and the way in which the budget has been managed and spent in 2011. It recalls that the European Union's operational expenditure covers the various headings of the financial framework and takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed. In accordance with the Financial Regulation, the Commission implements the general budget using the following methods: direct or indirect centralised management (by means of bodies or agencies of public law or other); decentralised management where the Commission delegates certain tasks for the implementation of the budget to third countries; and, thirdly, shared management where budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States, in areas such as agricultural expenditure and structural actions.

    The document also presents the different financial actors involved in the budget process (accounting officers, internal officers and authorising officers) and recalls their respective roles in the context of the tasks of sound financial management.

    Amongst the other legal elements relating to the implementation of the EU budget presented in this document, the paper focuses on the following issues:

    • accounting principles applicable to the management of EU spending (business continuity, consistency of accounting methods, comparability of information ...);
    • consolidation methods of figures for all major controlled entities (the consolidated financial statements of the EU comprise all significant controlled entities –institutions, organisations and agencies, this being 50 controlled entities, 5 joint ventures and 4 associates. In comparison with 2010, the scope of consolidation has been extended by 7 controlled entities (one institution, 6 agencies);
    • the recognition of financial assets in the EU (tangible and intangible assets, financial assets and other miscellaneous investments);
    • the way in which EU public expenditure is committed and spent, including pre-financing (cash advances intended for the benefit of an EU organ);
    • the means of recovery following irregularities detected;
    • the modus operandi of the accounting system;
    • the audit process followed by the European Parliament's granting of the discharge.

    To recap, the final control is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. The discharge represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. When granting the discharge, Parliament may highlight some observations that it considers important, often by recommending that the Commission takes action on the aspects in question.

    The document also details specific expenditure of the institutions, in particular: i) pensions of former Members and functionaries of institutions; ii) joint sickness insurance scheme and iii) buildings.

    Lastly, the document presents a series of tables and detailed technical indicators on (i) the balance sheet; (ii) the economic outturn account; (iii) cashflow tables; (iv) technical annexes concerning the financial statements.

    2) Implementation of appropriations under Section II of the budget for the financial year 2011: the document comprises a series of detailed tables, the most important concerning the implementation of the budget. Concerning the Council's expenditure, the table on the financial and budgetary implementation of this institution is presented as follows (information drawn from the Financial Activity Report 2011 (Section II - European Council and Council).

    Budget 2011: the European Council and Council budget 2011 was established at EUR 563.3 million. At the end of the financial year 2011 an amount of EUR 506.8 million was committed (corresponding to an implementation rate of 90 %).

    The main reasons for the under spending of EUR 56.4 million are:

    • under-spending of the delegations' travel envelopes (EUR 20.9 million);
    • under-occupation of the establishment plan and lower salary costs (EUR 9.1 million);
    • the lower need for organising meetings, technical installations and office equipment
    • (EUR 6.8 million);
    • the lower need for interpretation (EUR 6 million);
    • non activation of the reserve (EUR 6 million);
    • fewer needs for other staff expenditure (e.g. contractual agents, seconded national
    • experts, other outside services) (EUR 4.7 million);
    • fewer needs in fitting-out works in the Council buildings (EUR 2.2 million).

    N.B.: the 2011 budget for the European Council and Council was drawn up with the goal of not increasing payments in real terms, with the exception of preparing for the accession of Croatia. The Secretary General of the Council has not introduced any demands for new staff, except for the Cabinet of the President of the European Council. This position indicates that new initiatives and the need for supplementary resources will be covered by reductions in other areas.

    Appropriations carried over: the implementation of amounts carried over from 2010 to 2011 totalled EUR 40.2 million out of EUR 49.8 million. The objective remains to further increase the implementation of the carried over amounts.

    Revenue: The General Secretariat of the Council (GSC)'s revenue operations in 2011 amounted to EUR 128.6 million. From this amount EUR 117.5 million was recovered during the financial year while the rest will be recovered in 2012. More than half (EUR 62.4 million, or 53 %) of these recovered revenues are related to the Community taxes, levies and dues which were collected from the GSC's staff in 2011.

    3) Budgetary implementation - conclusions: the main characteristics of the Council’s budgetary implementation for the financial year 2011 was chiefly marked by:

    • EEAS: the creation of the European External Action Service (EEAS), as foreseen in the Treaty of Lisbon, reduced the expenditure foreseen for the functioning of the European Council and the Council. A letter of amendment to the draft budget for the financial year 2011 for the European Council and Council reduced the resources of section II by 411 establishment plan posts and EUR 79.7 million in terms of appropriations. These resources and related activities were transferred as the Council's contribution to the establishment of the EEAS;
    • Council administrative modernisation process:  the GSC continued the process of its administrative modernisation. In this context, the GSC transferred its Sickness Insurance Antenne to the Paymaster Office (PMO of the Commission;
    • Progress of construction projects: the project for the Europa Building passed from the consolidation phase to the actual construction work. Note that the project foresees the renovation of the Résidence Palace to act as the seat of the European Council.
    New

    PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011, as part of the 2011 discharge procedure.

    Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: Council and European Council.

    Legal reminder: the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the year 2011 have been prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions and bodies under Article 129.2 of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union. They were prepared in accordance with Title VII of this Financial Regulation and with the accounting principles, rules and methods set out in the notes to the financial statements.

    The objective of the financial statements is to provide information about the financial position, performance and cashflows of an entity that is useful to a wide range of users. The objective is to provide information useful for decision making, and to demonstrate the accountability of the entity for the resources entrusted to it.

    1) Purpose: the document helps to bring insight into the EU budget mechanism and the way in which the budget has been managed and spent in 2011. It recalls that the European Union's operational expenditure covers the various headings of the financial framework and takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed. In accordance with the Financial Regulation, the Commission implements the general budget using the following methods: direct or indirect centralised management (by means of bodies or agencies of public law or other); decentralised management where the Commission delegates certain tasks for the implementation of the budget to third countries; and, thirdly, shared management where budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States, in areas such as agricultural expenditure and structural actions.

    The document also presents the different financial actors involved in the budget process (accounting officers, internal officers and authorising officers) and recalls their respective roles in the context of the tasks of sound financial management.

    Amongst the other legal elements relating to the implementation of the EU budget presented in this document, the paper focuses on the following issues:

    • accounting principles applicable to the management of EU spending (business continuity, consistency of accounting methods, comparability of information ...);
    • consolidation methods of figures for all major controlled entities (the consolidated financial statements of the EU comprise all significant controlled entities –institutions, organisations and agencies, this being 50 controlled entities, 5 joint ventures and 4 associates. In comparison with 2010, the scope of consolidation has been extended by 7 controlled entities (one institution, 6 agencies);
    • the recognition of financial assets in the EU (tangible and intangible assets, financial assets and other miscellaneous investments);
    • the way in which EU public expenditure is committed and spent, including pre-financing (cash advances intended for the benefit of an EU organ);
    • the means of recovery following irregularities detected;
    • the modus operandi of the accounting system;
    • the audit process followed by the European Parliament's granting of the discharge.

    To recap, the final control is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. The discharge represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. When granting the discharge, Parliament may highlight some observations that it considers important, often by recommending that the Commission takes action on the aspects in question.

    The document also details specific expenditure of the institutions, in particular: i) pensions of former Members and functionaries of institutions; ii) joint sickness insurance scheme and iii) buildings.

    Lastly, the document presents a series of tables and detailed technical indicators on (i) the balance sheet; (ii) the economic outturn account; (iii) cashflow tables; (iv) technical annexes concerning the financial statements.

    2) Implementation of appropriations under Section II of the budget for the financial year 2011: the document comprises a series of detailed tables, the most important concerning the implementation of the budget. Concerning the Council's expenditure, the table on the financial and budgetary implementation of this institution is presented as follows (information drawn from the Financial Activity Report 2011 (Section II - European Council and Council).

    Budget 2011: the European Council and Council budget 2011 was established at EUR 563.3 million. At the end of the financial year 2011 an amount of EUR 506.8 million was committed (corresponding to an implementation rate of 90 %).

    The main reasons for the under spending of EUR 56.4 million are:

    • under-spending of the delegations' travel envelopes (EUR 20.9 million);
    • under-occupation of the establishment plan and lower salary costs (EUR 9.1 million);
    • the lower need for organising meetings, technical installations and office equipment
    • (EUR 6.8 million);
    • the lower need for interpretation (EUR 6 million);
    • non activation of the reserve (EUR 6 million);
    • fewer needs for other staff expenditure (e.g. contractual agents, seconded national
    • experts, other outside services) (EUR 4.7 million);
    • fewer needs in fitting-out works in the Council buildings (EUR 2.2 million).

    N.B.: the 2011 budget for the European Council and Council was drawn up with the goal of not increasing payments in real terms, with the exception of preparing for the accession of Croatia. The Secretary General of the Council has not introduced any demands for new staff, except for the Cabinet of the President of the European Council. This position indicates that new initiatives and the need for supplementary resources will be covered by reductions in other areas.

    Appropriations carried over: the implementation of amounts carried over from 2010 to 2011 totalled EUR 40.2 million out of EUR 49.8 million. The objective remains to further increase the implementation of the carried over amounts.

    Revenue: The General Secretariat of the Council (GSC)'s revenue operations in 2011 amounted to EUR 128.6 million. From this amount EUR 117.5 million was recovered during the financial year while the rest will be recovered in 2012. More than half (EUR 62.4 million, or 53 %) of these recovered revenues are related to the Community taxes, levies and dues which were collected from the GSC's staff in 2011.

    3) Budgetary implementation - conclusions: the main characteristics of the Council’s budgetary implementation for the financial year 2011 was chiefly marked by:

    • EEAS: the creation of the European External Action Service (EEAS), as foreseen in the Treaty of Lisbon, reduced the expenditure foreseen for the functioning of the European Council and the Council. A letter of amendment to the draft budget for the financial year 2011 for the European Council and Council reduced the resources of section II by 411 establishment plan posts and EUR 79.7 million in terms of appropriations. These resources and related activities were transferred as the Council's contribution to the establishment of the EEAS;
    • Council administrative modernisation process:  the GSC continued the process of its administrative modernisation. In this context, the GSC transferred its Sickness Insurance Antenne to the Paymaster Office (PMO of the Commission;
    • Progress of construction projects: the project for the Europa Building passed from the consolidation phase to the actual construction work. Note that the project foresees the renovation of the Résidence Palace to act as the seat of the European Council.
    activities/0/type
    Old
    Non-legislative basic document
    New
    Non-legislative basic document published
    activities/1
    date
    2012-09-06T00:00:00
    docs
    body
    CoA
    type
    Court of Auditors: opinion, report
    activities/1/committees/4/rapporteur/0/mepref
    Old
    4de183f80fb8127435bdbce4
    New
    4f1ac71ab819f25efd000068
    activities/1/committees/4/shadows/0/group
    Old
    EPP
    New
    PPE
    activities/1/committees/4/shadows/0/mepref
    Old
    4de184620fb8127435bdbd78
    New
    4f1ac79cb819f25efd000099
    activities/1/committees/4/shadows/1/group
    Old
    EPP
    New
    PPE
    activities/1/committees/4/shadows/1/mepref
    Old
    4de1888b0fb8127435bdc36b
    New
    4f1adb88b819f207b30000cc
    activities/1/committees/4/shadows/2/mepref
    Old
    4de185fd0fb8127435bdbfc0
    New
    4f1ac966b819f25efd000133
    activities/1/committees/4/shadows/3/group
    Old
    EPP
    New
    ALDE
    activities/1/committees/4/shadows/3/mepref
    Old
    4dee5a2d0fb8127435be059f
    New
    4f1adb75b819f207b30000c6
    activities/1/committees/4/shadows/4/mepref
    Old
    4de188650fb8127435bdc331
    New
    4f1adb8fb819f207b30000cf
    activities/1/committees/4/shadows/5/mepref
    Old
    4de1888a0fb8127435bdc36a
    New
    4f1adb84b819f207b30000cb
    activities/1/committees/4/shadows/6/mepref
    Old
    4de182e40fb8127435bdbb4b
    New
    4f1ac5e7b819f25efd00000a
    activities/1/committees/4/shadows/7/mepref
    Old
    4de1847f0fb8127435bdbd9f
    New
    4f1ac7b8b819f25efd0000a5
    activities/1/committees/10/committee_full
    Old
    Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
    New
    Women's Rights and Gender Equality
    activities/3
    date
    2013-01-29T00:00:00
    docs
    type: Committee draft report title: PE497.966
    body
    EP
    type
    Committee draft report
    activities/4
    date
    2013-03-19T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    committees/4/rapporteur/0/mepref
    Old
    4de183f80fb8127435bdbce4
    New
    4f1ac71ab819f25efd000068
    committees/4/shadows/0/group
    Old
    EPP
    New
    PPE
    committees/4/shadows/0/mepref
    Old
    4de184620fb8127435bdbd78
    New
    4f1ac79cb819f25efd000099
    committees/4/shadows/1/group
    Old
    EPP
    New
    PPE
    committees/4/shadows/1/mepref
    Old
    4de1888b0fb8127435bdc36b
    New
    4f1adb88b819f207b30000cc
    committees/4/shadows/2/mepref
    Old
    4de185fd0fb8127435bdbfc0
    New
    4f1ac966b819f25efd000133
    committees/4/shadows/3/group
    Old
    EPP
    New
    ALDE
    committees/4/shadows/3/mepref
    Old
    4dee5a2d0fb8127435be059f
    New
    4f1adb75b819f207b30000c6
    committees/4/shadows/4/mepref
    Old
    4de188650fb8127435bdc331
    New
    4f1adb8fb819f207b30000cf
    committees/4/shadows/5/mepref
    Old
    4de1888a0fb8127435bdc36a
    New
    4f1adb84b819f207b30000cb
    committees/4/shadows/6/mepref
    Old
    4de182e40fb8127435bdbb4b
    New
    4f1ac5e7b819f25efd00000a
    committees/4/shadows/7/mepref
    Old
    4de1847f0fb8127435bdbd9f
    New
    4f1ac7b8b819f25efd0000a5
    committees/10/committee_full
    Old
    Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
    New
    Women's Rights and Gender Equality
    activities/3
    date
    2013-01-29T00:00:00
    docs
    type: Committee draft report title: PE497.966
    body
    EP
    type
    Committee draft report
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    New
    Procedure lapsed or withdrawn
    activities/4
    date
    2013-04-16T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    activities/1/docs/0/text
    • OBJECTIVE: presentation of the Report of the Court of Auditors on the 2011 budget (section II – European Council).

      CONTENT: the Court of Auditors published its 35th Annual Report on the implementation of the EU budget for the 2011 financial year.

      In accordance with the tasks and objectives conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, it provides under the discharge procedure, for both the European Parliament and European Council, a statement of assurance (“DAS”) about the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the transactions of each institution, body or agency of the EU, based on an independent external audit.

      The audit also focused on the budget implementation of the European Council.

      On the basis of its audit work, the Court considers that payments for “Administrative and other expenditure” policy are, overall, significantly error-free. The estimated error rate is 0.1 %.

      The Court, however, draws attention to the errors and weaknesses which did not affect the Court’s conclusion. The Court examined a sample of procurement procedures and noted several weaknesses in the application of selection and award criteria, some of which had an impact on the results of the procedure. Other weaknesses relate to the organisation of cross border competition, to the management of automatic award procedures and to the respect of provisions as regards the drafting and filing of tendering documents.

      The Court therefore recommended that the institutions and bodies of the EU took steps ensure that authorising officers improve the design, coordination and performance of procurement procedures through appropriate checks and better guidance.

      The Court also made a number of comments specific to each institution or body of the European Union. These observations do not affect the positive overall appraisal given that they do not significantly affect overall administrative expenditure.

      In the specific case of the audit of the European Council, the Court noted in particular the following points:

      ·        procurement: five procurement procedures were examined. In two cases relating to cleaning services and to the purchase of service clothing and shoes, if tenderers did not propose a price for certain items of the tender, tender specifications enabled the European Council to estimate a price based on the average price submitted for this item by the other tenderers. The European Council thus modifies the value of the tender in a way which is not laid down in the Financial Regulation.

    activities/0/body
    Old
    EP
    New
    EC
    activities/0/commission
    • DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
    activities/0/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0436/COM_COM(2012)0436_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52012DC0436:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2012)0436
    activities/0/type
    Old
    Date
    New
    Non-legislative basic document
    activities/1
    date
    2012-07-25T00:00:00
    docs
    url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0436/COM_COM(2012)0436_EN.pdf title: COM(2012)0436 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52012DC0436:EN
    body
    EC
    type
    Non-legislative basic document
    commission
    DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
    activities/1/body
    Old
    EP
    New
    CoA
    activities/1/date
    Old
    2013-05-09T00:00:00
    New
    2012-09-06T00:00:00
    activities/1/docs
    • type: Court of Auditors: opinion, report title: N7-0127/2012
    • url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2012:3440001:SOM:EN:HTML type: Court of Auditors: opinion, report title: OJ C 344 12.11.2012, p. 0001
    activities/1/type
    Old
    EP 1R Plenary
    New
    Court of Auditors: opinion, report
    activities/2
    date
    2012-09-06T00:00:00
    docs
    body
    CoA
    type
    Court of Auditors: opinion, report
    activities/4
    body
    EP
    date
    2013-02-26T00:00:00
    type
    Deadline Amendments
    activities/8
    body
    EC
    date
    2013-05-09T00:00:00
    type
    Prev DG PRES
    commission
    DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
    activities/3/committees/1/date
    2012-10-10T00:00:00
    activities/3/committees/1/rapporteur
    • group: EPP name: SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio
    committees/1/date
    2012-10-10T00:00:00
    committees/1/rapporteur
    • group: EPP name: SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio
    activities/1/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=436
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0436/COM_COM(2012)0436_EN.pdf
    activities/2
    date
    2012-09-06T00:00:00
    docs
    body
    CoA
    type
    Court of Auditors: opinion, report
    activities/5
    date
    2013-04-16T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    activities/6/type
    Old
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    New
    EP 1R Plenary
    activities/7
    body
    EC
    date
    2013-05-09T00:00:00
    type
    Prev DG PRES
    commission
    DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
    activities/1/docs/0/text
    • PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011, as part of the 2011 discharge procedure.

      Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: Council and European Council.

      Legal reminder: the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the year 2011 have been prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions and bodies under Article 129.2 of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union. They were prepared in accordance with Title VII of this Financial Regulation and with the accounting principles, rules and methods set out in the notes to the financial statements.

      The objective of the financial statements is to provide information about the financial position, performance and cashflows of an entity that is useful to a wide range of users. The objective is to provide information useful for decision making, and to demonstrate the accountability of the entity for the resources entrusted to it.

      1) Purpose: the document helps to bring insight into the EU budget mechanism and the way in which the budget has been managed and spent in 2011. It recalls that the European Union's operational expenditure covers the various headings of the financial framework and takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed. In accordance with the Financial Regulation, the Commission implements the general budget using the following methods: direct or indirect centralised management (by means of bodies or agencies of public law or other); decentralised management where the Commission delegates certain tasks for the implementation of the budget to third countries; and, thirdly, shared management where budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States, in areas such as agricultural expenditure and structural actions.

      The document also presents the different financial actors involved in the budget process (accounting officers, internal officers and authorising officers) and recalls their respective roles in the context of the tasks of sound financial management.

      Amongst the other legal elements relating to the implementation of the EU budget presented in this document, the paper focuses on the following issues:

      • accounting principles applicable to the management of EU spending (business continuity, consistency of accounting methods, comparability of information ...);
      • consolidation methods of figures for all major controlled entities (the consolidated financial statements of the EU comprise all significant controlled entities –institutions, organisations and agencies, this being 50 controlled entities, 5 joint ventures and 4 associates. In comparison with 2010, the scope of consolidation has been extended by 7 controlled entities (one institution, 6 agencies);
      • the recognition of financial assets in the EU (tangible and intangible assets, financial assets and other miscellaneous investments);
      • the way in which EU public expenditure is committed and spent, including pre-financing (cash advances intended for the benefit of an EU organ);
      • the means of recovery following irregularities detected;
      • the modus operandi of the accounting system;
      • the audit process followed by the European Parliament's granting of the discharge.

      To recap, the final control is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. The discharge represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. When granting the discharge, Parliament may highlight some observations that it considers important, often by recommending that the Commission takes action on the aspects in question.

      The document also details specific expenditure of the institutions, in particular: i) pensions of former Members and functionaries of institutions; ii) joint sickness insurance scheme and iii) buildings.

      Lastly, the document presents a series of tables and detailed technical indicators on (i) the balance sheet; (ii) the economic outturn account; (iii) cashflow tables; (iv) technical annexes concerning the financial statements.

      2) Implementation of appropriations under Section II of the budget for the financial year 2011: the document comprises a series of detailed tables, the most important concerning the implementation of the budget. Concerning the Council's expenditure, the table on the financial and budgetary implementation of this institution is presented as follows (information drawn from the Financial Activity Report 2011 (Section II - European Council and Council).

      Budget 2011: the European Council and Council budget 2011 was established at EUR 563.3 million. At the end of the financial year 2011 an amount of EUR 506.8 million was committed (corresponding to an implementation rate of 90 %).

      The main reasons for the under spending of EUR 56.4 million are:

      • under-spending of the delegations' travel envelopes (EUR 20.9 million);
      • under-occupation of the establishment plan and lower salary costs (EUR 9.1 million);
      • the lower need for organising meetings, technical installations and office equipment
      • (EUR 6.8 million);
      • the lower need for interpretation (EUR 6 million);
      • non activation of the reserve (EUR 6 million);
      • fewer needs for other staff expenditure (e.g. contractual agents, seconded national
      • experts, other outside services) (EUR 4.7 million);
      • fewer needs in fitting-out works in the Council buildings (EUR 2.2 million).

      N.B.: the 2011 budget for the European Council and Council was drawn up with the goal of not increasing payments in real terms, with the exception of preparing for the accession of Croatia. The Secretary General of the Council has not introduced any demands for new staff, except for the Cabinet of the President of the European Council. This position indicates that new initiatives and the need for supplementary resources will be covered by reductions in other areas.

      Appropriations carried over: the implementation of amounts carried over from 2010 to 2011 totalled EUR 40.2 million out of EUR 49.8 million. The objective remains to further increase the implementation of the carried over amounts.

      Revenue: The General Secretariat of the Council (GSC)'s revenue operations in 2011 amounted to EUR 128.6 million. From this amount EUR 117.5 million was recovered during the financial year while the rest will be recovered in 2012. More than half (EUR 62.4 million, or 53 %) of these recovered revenues are related to the Community taxes, levies and dues which were collected from the GSC's staff in 2011.

      3) Budgetary implementation - conclusions: the main characteristics of the Council’s budgetary implementation for the financial year 2011 was chiefly marked by:

      • EEAS: the creation of the European External Action Service (EEAS), as foreseen in the Treaty of Lisbon, reduced the expenditure foreseen for the functioning of the European Council and the Council. A letter of amendment to the draft budget for the financial year 2011 for the European Council and Council reduced the resources of section II by 411 establishment plan posts and EUR 79.7 million in terms of appropriations. These resources and related activities were transferred as the Council's contribution to the establishment of the EEAS;
      • Council administrative modernisation process:  the GSC continued the process of its administrative modernisation. In this context, the GSC transferred its Sickness Insurance Antenne to the Paymaster Office (PMO of the Commission;
      • Progress of construction projects: the project for the Europa Building passed from the consolidation phase to the actual construction work. Note that the project foresees the renovation of the Résidence Palace to act as the seat of the European Council.
    activities/1/docs/0/celexid
    CELEX:52012DC0436:EN
    activities/2/committees/1/date
    2012-10-10T00:00:00
    activities/2/committees/1/rapporteur
    • group: EPP name: SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio
    committees/1/date
    2012-10-10T00:00:00
    committees/1/rapporteur
    • group: EPP name: SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio
    activities/3
    body
    EP
    date
    2013-02-26T00:00:00
    type
    Deadline Amendments
    activities/2/committees/4/date
    2012-02-29T00:00:00
    activities/2/committees/4/rapporteur
    • group: ECR name: ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea
    activities/2/committees/4/shadows
    • group: EPP name: DEUTSCH Tamás
    • group: EPP name: SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros
    • group: EPP name: SONIK Bogusław
    • group: S&D name: KALFIN Ivailo
    • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
    • group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo
    • group: EFD name: ANDREASEN Marta
    • group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin
    activities/3
    date
    2013-03-19T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    committees/4/date
    2012-02-29T00:00:00
    committees/4/rapporteur
    • group: ECR name: ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea
    committees/4/shadows
    • group: EPP name: DEUTSCH Tamás
    • group: EPP name: SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros
    • group: EPP name: SONIK Bogusław
    • group: S&D name: KALFIN Ivailo
    • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
    • group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo
    • group: EFD name: ANDREASEN Marta
    • group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin
    activities
    • body: EP date: 2012-07-25T00:00:00 type: Date
    • date: 2012-07-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=436 type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2012)0436 body: EC type: Non-legislative basic document commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
    • date: 2012-09-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
    • date: 2013-05-09T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
    • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
    links
    other
    • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
    procedure
    dossier_of_the_committee
    CONT/7/10483
    reference
    2012/2177(DEC)
    title
    2011 discharge: EU general budget, European Council
    stage_reached
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    type
    DEC - Discharge procedure
    subject
    8.70.03.06 2011 discharge