BETA


2015/3014(RSP) Resolution on the special situation of islands

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead REGI
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 136-p5

Events

2016/06/08
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2016/02/04
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2016/02/04
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2016/02/04
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution, tabled by the Committee on Regional Development, on the special situation of islands.

The economic crisis has impacted dramatically on the national and regional budgets of many Member States by limiting the availability of financing in many sectors and leading to a 20 % collapse of public investment. The impact of the crisis has seriously affected the potential development of many disadvantaged regions, including islands.

EU islands are also peripheral regions situated in some cases on the EU’s external borders and are particularly vulnerable to the challenges which Europe is currently facing , such as globalisation, demographic trends, climate change, energy supply and, especially for the southern areas, exposure to increasing migration flows.

Remedy island region handicaps : Parliament encouraged the Commission to:

provide a clear definition of the type of geographical, natural and demographic permanent handicaps that insular regions can suffer from; state how it intends to implement the wording of Article 174 of the TFEU regarding the permanent handicaps of insular regions that hinder their natural development and prevent them from achieving economic, social and territorial cohesion.

Recalling that certain handicaps are more difficult to cope with for islands, Parliament called on the Commission to:

launch an in-depth study/analysis on the extra costs incurred as a result of being islands, in terms of the transport system for people and goods, energy supply and access to markets, in particular for SMEs; set up a homogeneous group made up of all island territories on the basis of Article 174 of the TFEU, which recognises the special situation of islands.

The resolution insisted on the need:

for better connectivity through maritime routes, improved access to ports and better air transport services; considers that particular emphasis should be placed on transport hubs, inter-modal transport and sustainable mobility; to support balanced territorial development of island regions by promoting innovation and competiveness in these regions, which are remote from the major administrative and economic centres and do not benefit from ease of access to transport, and by strengthening local production for local markets; invest in infrastructure in order to ensure broadband access on islands and the full participation of islands in the digital single market; provide education at all levels, where necessary also by making more use of distance education systems.

Exploit the potential of the islands : Parliament emphasised that islands benefit from a territorial potential: (i) the development of sustainable tourism in addition to seasonal tourism, focusing on the promotion of cultural heritage and specific artisanal economic activities; (ii) the huge potential of ocean, wind and solar energy and the potential of islands to become important sources of alternative energy.

It stressed, in this connection, the importance of using all possible synergies between the European Structural and Investment Funds and other Union instruments with a view to counterbalancing the handicaps of islands.

The Commission is called upon to:

establish an ‘ EU Strategic Framework for Islands ’ with a view to linking up instruments that can have a major territorial impact; establish an ‘ islands desk’ linked to the Commission’s Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy (DG REGIO) and made up of a small group of officials in order to coordinate and analyse issues relating to island regions; submit a communication containing an ‘ Agenda for EU Islands’ and, subsequently, a White Paper to monitor the development of islands, based on best practice and involving local, regional and national authorities and other relevant actors, including economic and social partners and representatives of civil society; propose a European Year of Islands and Mountains.

Lastly, Parliament recalled that many islands in the Mediterranean have seen huge numbers of migrants arriving and are having to deal with this situation and stressed the need for a holistic EU approach, which should include EU support and a joint effort by all Member States.

Documents
2016/02/04
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2016/02/01
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2016/01/26
   EP - Oral question/interpellation by Parliament
Documents

Documents

Activities

Votes

B8-0165/2016 - Am 1 #

2016/02/04 Outcome: +: 495, -: 119, 0: 25
DE IT FR ES RO PT HU EL AT GB HR SE MT SK BE CY SI PL BG LV IE LT CZ LU EE NL FI DK
Total
81
60
66
44
27
20
18
15
17
59
11
15
6
11
20
5
7
51
17
5
4
10
16
4
5
23
10
11
icon: PPE PPE
189

Sweden PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1

Ireland PPE

For (1)

1
2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
166

Croatia S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Slovakia S&D

Against (1)

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Finland S&D

1

Denmark S&D

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
36

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
34

Romania ENF

1

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
10

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

France NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Hungary NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Germany ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Denmark ALDE

3
icon: ECR ECR
60

Italy ECR

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

events/1/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2016-02-04-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2016-0165_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2016-0165_EN.html
events/1/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160204&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/2
date
2016-02-04T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0049_EN.html title: T8-0049/2016
summary
events/2
date
2016-02-04T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0049_EN.html title: T8-0049/2016
summary
committees/0/date
    docs/1/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2016-0165&language=EN
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2016-0165_EN.html
    docs/2/body
    EC
    events/2/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0049
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0049_EN.html
    activities
    • date: 2016-02-04T00:00:00 body: EP type: Debate in Parliament docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0049 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0049/2016
    commission
    • body: EC dg: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: CREȚU Corina
    committees/0
    type
    Responsible Committee
    body
    EP
    committee_full
    Regional Development
    committee
    REGI
    associated
    False
    date
    committees/0
    body
    EP
    responsible
    True
    committee_full
    Regional Development
    committee
    REGI
    docs
    • date: 2016-01-26T00:00:00 docs: title: B8-0106/2016 type: Oral question/interpellation by Parliament body: EP
    • date: 2016-02-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2016-0165&language=EN title: B8-0165/2016 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2016-06-08T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=26811&j=0&l=en title: SP(2016)242 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
    events
    • date: 2016-02-04T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=26811&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
    • date: 2016-02-04T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160204&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2016-02-04T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0049 title: T8-0049/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution, tabled by the Committee on Regional Development, on the special situation of islands. The economic crisis has impacted dramatically on the national and regional budgets of many Member States by limiting the availability of financing in many sectors and leading to a 20 % collapse of public investment. The impact of the crisis has seriously affected the potential development of many disadvantaged regions, including islands. EU islands are also peripheral regions situated in some cases on the EU’s external borders and are particularly vulnerable to the challenges which Europe is currently facing , such as globalisation, demographic trends, climate change, energy supply and, especially for the southern areas, exposure to increasing migration flows. Remedy island region handicaps : Parliament encouraged the Commission to: provide a clear definition of the type of geographical, natural and demographic permanent handicaps that insular regions can suffer from; state how it intends to implement the wording of Article 174 of the TFEU regarding the permanent handicaps of insular regions that hinder their natural development and prevent them from achieving economic, social and territorial cohesion. Recalling that certain handicaps are more difficult to cope with for islands, Parliament called on the Commission to: launch an in-depth study/analysis on the extra costs incurred as a result of being islands, in terms of the transport system for people and goods, energy supply and access to markets, in particular for SMEs; set up a homogeneous group made up of all island territories on the basis of Article 174 of the TFEU, which recognises the special situation of islands. The resolution insisted on the need: for better connectivity through maritime routes, improved access to ports and better air transport services; considers that particular emphasis should be placed on transport hubs, inter-modal transport and sustainable mobility; to support balanced territorial development of island regions by promoting innovation and competiveness in these regions, which are remote from the major administrative and economic centres and do not benefit from ease of access to transport, and by strengthening local production for local markets; invest in infrastructure in order to ensure broadband access on islands and the full participation of islands in the digital single market; provide education at all levels, where necessary also by making more use of distance education systems. Exploit the potential of the islands : Parliament emphasised that islands benefit from a territorial potential: (i) the development of sustainable tourism in addition to seasonal tourism, focusing on the promotion of cultural heritage and specific artisanal economic activities; (ii) the huge potential of ocean, wind and solar energy and the potential of islands to become important sources of alternative energy. It stressed, in this connection, the importance of using all possible synergies between the European Structural and Investment Funds and other Union instruments with a view to counterbalancing the handicaps of islands. The Commission is called upon to: establish an ‘ EU Strategic Framework for Islands ’ with a view to linking up instruments that can have a major territorial impact; establish an ‘ islands desk’ linked to the Commission’s Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy (DG REGIO) and made up of a small group of officials in order to coordinate and analyse issues relating to island regions; submit a communication containing an ‘ Agenda for EU Islands’ and, subsequently, a White Paper to monitor the development of islands, based on best practice and involving local, regional and national authorities and other relevant actors, including economic and social partners and representatives of civil society; propose a European Year of Islands and Mountains. Lastly, Parliament recalled that many islands in the Mediterranean have seen huge numbers of migrants arriving and are having to deal with this situation and stressed the need for a holistic EU approach, which should include EU support and a joint effort by all Member States.
    • date: 2016-02-04T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
    links
    other
    • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: CREȚU Corina
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    REGI/8/04854
    New
    • REGI/8/04854
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 136-p5
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 128-p5
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 4.70.02 Cohesion policy, Cohesion Fund (CF)
    • 4.70.06 Outlying and outermost regions, overseas countries and territories
    New
    4.70.02
    Cohesion policy, Cohesion Fund (CF)
    4.70.06
    Outlying and outermost regions, overseas countries and territories
    procedure/subtype
    Old
    Debate or resolution on oral questions
    New
    Debate or resolution on oral question/interpellation
    activities/0/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0049 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0049/2016
    activities/0/type
    Old
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    New
    Debate in Parliament
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    New
    Procedure completed
    procedure/title
    Old
    Island regions
    New
    Resolution on the special situation of islands
    activities
    • date: 2016-02-04T00:00:00 body: EP type: Debate in plenary scheduled
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
    links
    other
    • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: CREȚU Corina
    procedure
    dossier_of_the_committee
    REGI/8/04854
    reference
    2015/3014(RSP)
    title
    Island regions
    legal_basis
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 128-p5
    stage_reached
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    subtype
    Debate or resolution on oral questions
    type
    RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
    subject