BETA


2018/0196(COD) Common provisions on European Regional Development Fund, European Social Fund Plus, Cohesion Fund, and European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and financial rules for those and for Asylum and Migration Fund, Internal Security Fund and Border Management and Visa Instrument 2021–2027

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead REGI NOVAKOV Andrey (icon: EPP EPP), KREHL Constanze (icon: S&D S&D) KNOTEK Ondřej (icon: Renew Renew), NIENASS Niklas (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), DONATO Francesca (icon: ID ID), KLOC Izabela-Helena (icon: ECR ECR), OMARJEE Younous (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Former Responsible Committee REGI NOVAKOV Andrey (icon: PPE PPE), KREHL Constanze (icon: S&D S&D)
Former Committee Opinion AGRI ZOANĂ Maria Gabriela (icon: S&D S&D) Ivan JAKOVČIĆ (icon: ALDE ALDE), Laurenţiu REBEGA (icon: ENF ENF), Miguel VIEGAS (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Former Committee Opinion ENVI VĂLEAN Adina-Ioana (icon: PPE PPE)
Former Committee Opinion ECON MALETIĆ Ivana (icon: PPE PPE) Stanisław OŻÓG (icon: ECR ECR), Ramon TREMOSA i BALCELLS (icon: ALDE ALDE), Miguel VIEGAS (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Former Committee Opinion CONT HOFFMANN Iris (icon: S&D S&D)
Former Committee Opinion EMPL JONGERIUS Agnes (icon: S&D S&D) Enrique CALVET CHAMBON (icon: ALDE ALDE), Arne GERICKE (icon: ECR ECR), Rina Ronja KARI (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), Csaba SÓGOR (icon: PPE PPE)
Former Committee Opinion LIBE ZDECHOVSKÝ Tomáš (icon: PPE PPE) Jean LAMBERT (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), Louis MICHEL (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Former Committee Opinion TRAN ZŁOTOWSKI Kosma (icon: ECR ECR) Claudia SCHMIDT (icon: PPE PPE)
Former Committee Opinion FEMM GIRLING Julie (icon: PPE PPE)
Former Committee Opinion BUDG MUREŞAN Siegfried (icon: PPE PPE) Liadh NÍ RIADA (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Former Committee Opinion PECH
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 59-p4, TFEU 177-p1, TFEU 177-p2, TFEU 322-p1, TFEU 349-p1sub1-as1

Events

2021/06/24
   CSL - Draft final act
Documents
2021/06/24
   CSL - Final act signed
2021/06/23
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2021/06/23
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted a legislative resolution approving the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+), the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund (JTF) and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund (EMFAF) and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF), the Internal Security Fund (ISF) and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy (BMVI).

The Common Provisions Regulation (CPR) sets out, for the period 2021-2027, the financial rules for a range of funds under shared management which aim to help Member States strengthen their economic, social and territorial cohesion, reducing the gap between the levels of development of the various regions and the backwardness of the least favoured regions or islands.

Strategic objectives

The Common Provisions Regulation seeks to support 5 strategic objectives that reflect the main priorities of the EU:

1) a more competitive and smarter Europe by fostering smart and innovative economic transformation and regional connectivity to information and communication technologies (ICT);

2) a greener, more resilient and low-carbon Europe moving towards a carbon-free economy, by promoting a clean and fair energy transition, green and blue investments, the circular economy, climate change mitigation and adaptation, risk prevention and management, and sustainable urban mobility

3) a more connected Europe through better mobility;

4) a more social and inclusive Europe implementing the European set of social rights;

5) a Europe closer to its citizens , by promoting sustainable and integrated development of all types of territories and local initiatives.

Actions supported

The ERDF, the ESF+, the Cohesion Fund and the Youth Forum should contribute to actions aimed at strengthening the economic, social and territorial cohesion of the Union in accordance with the following aims:

(a) ‘Investment for jobs and growth’ in the Member States and regions, an objective supported by the ERDF, the ESF+, the Cohesion Fund and the Youth Forum; and

(b) ‘European territorial cooperation’ (Interreg), an objective supported by the ERDF.

The multi-annual investment projects financed by the funds should cover a wide range including transport infrastructure, hospitals and healthcare, clean energy, water management, sustainable urban development, research, innovation and digital transition, as well as employment programmes, social inclusion, education and training.

Budget

The resources for economic, social and territorial cohesion available for budgetary commitments for the period 2021-2027 under the multiannual financial framework amount to EUR 330 234 776 621 in 2018 prices for the ERDF, ESF+ and the Cohesion Fund, and EUR 7 500 000 000 in 2018 prices for the JTF.

These resources should be complemented by an amount of EUR 10 000 000 000 from the EU Recovery Instrument to support recovery from the COVID-19 crisis for the purpose of the JTF Regulation.

Co-financing rates will be up to 85% for the least developed regions, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and up to 80% for Interreg.

Climate action

The regulation sets specific climate targets for the ERDF and the Cohesion Fund (30% and 37% respectively) and ensures monitoring of respect for climate action contribution targets and an adjustment mechanism. Projects should also have to comply with the ‘do no significant harm’ principle, in line with the EU's environmental objectives.

Transfers and contribution to InvestEU

Transfers may be made to any other instrument under direct and indirect management, up to 5% of the initial allocation. Transfers of up to 20% of the initial allocation (up to 25% in very specific circumstances) may be made between the ERDF, ESF+ and the Cohesion Fund.

Simplified rules, governance and monitoring

The new legislation simplifies the rules, reduces red tape and ensures a more efficient use of resources. The Partnership Agreement should be simplified for all Member States.

In order to strengthen the link between cohesion policy and the European Semester of economic policy coordination, Member States should for the first time in 2024 carry out a mid-term review of each programme supported by the ERDF, ESF+, Cohesion Fund and the Youth Forum. The aim of this review will be to make a full adjustment of the programmes according to their performance.

Access to cohesion policy resources should be conditional on compliance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the UN Conventions on the Rights of the Child and the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. In addition, gender mainstreaming and gender integration should be taken into account and promoted throughout the preparation and implementation of programmes.

The legislation also provides for an effective monitoring mechanism for public procurement , as well as greater transparency, with Member States providing more detailed information on the beneficiaries of funding.

Lastly, a new provision empowers the Commission to adopt specific measures in case of the occurrence of unusual events, outside of the control of one or more Member States.

Documents
2021/06/18
   EP - Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
Documents
2021/06/18
   EP - Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
Documents
2021/06/15
   EP - Vote in committee, 2nd reading
2021/06/08
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2021/06/07
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading
2021/06/03
   EC - Commission communication on Council's position
2021/05/31
   CSL - Council position
Documents
2021/05/31
   CSL - Council position published
Documents
2021/03/15
   EP - Approval in committee of the text agreed at early 2nd reading interinstitutional negotiations
Documents
2021/03/03
   EP - Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations
Documents
2020/07/23
   PT_PARLIAMENT - Contribution
Documents
2020/07/06
   ES_PARLIAMENT - Contribution
Documents
2020/06/10
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
Documents
2020/05/28
   EC - Supplementary legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE: to lay down targeted amendments to the proposal for a Regulation laying down common provisions (CPR) relating to the European Structural and Investment Funds based on lessons learned in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak.

BACKGROUND: the Cohesion Policy instruments currently available under the 2014-2020 programmes have already been adapted in immediate response to the COVID19 pandemic:

- a first amendment to Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 has been adopted to strengthen Member States' health systems through increased investment and to support economic operators and workers;

- a second amendment aims to provide Member States with exceptional flexibility for the management and modification of their programmes when necessary in order to respond to the crisis situation.

Furthermore, the Commission is proposing to harness the full power of the EU budget to mobilise investment and frontload financial support in the crucial first years of recovery. These proposals are based on two pillars. On the one hand, an emergency European Recovery Instrument which will temporarily boost the financial firepower of the EU budget by using the headroom in the EU budget to raise additional financing on the financial markets. On the other hand, a reinforced multiannual financial framework for 2021-2027.

The present proposal, on which the European Parliament is again consulted, falls under the second pillar mentioned above. Cohesion policy investments in the period 2021-2027 will need to play their long-term role as growth and convergence enhancing instruments from 2021 onwards, when the EU economy will be expectedly starting to bounce back from the severe recession.

Support should be targeted in particular at those regions most affected by the crisis and which are less equipped to bounce back. Furthermore, the sudden and unexpected development of the pandemic highlights the need for a more flexible and responsive cohesion policy.

CONTENT: the proposal makes limited improvements and adjustments to the proposal for a Common Provisions Regulation (CPR), based on lessons learned in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak and its effects. The proposed amendments aim to:

- give greater flexibility to Member States to allow them to transfer resources between the Funds at any time during the programming period;

- provide mechanisms that could be called upon quickly in the event of further shocks to the Union in the coming years. This would allow the Commission to adopt implementing acts establishing temporary measures concerning the use of the Funds in exceptional and unusual circumstances, allowing: (i) an increase of 10 percentage points in interim payments; (ii) the selection of operations already completed; (iii) the retroactive eligibility of operations; (iv) the extension of deadlines for the submission of documents and data;

- allowing more flexibility to allow for the phasing of operations, as the COVID-19 outbreak has compromised the ability of beneficiaries to carry out operations supported under the 2014-2020 programmes. In this respect, it is proposed to lower the threshold for phasing operations over two programming periods to EUR 5 million.

2020/05/10
   CZ_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2020/03/19
   DE_BUNDESRAT - Contribution
Documents
2020/03/16
   RO_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2020/01/14
   EC - Supplementary legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE: to introduce targeted amendments to the proposal for a Regulation laying down common provisions with a view to integrating the Just Transition Fund as a new Cohesion Policy Fund.

BACKGROUND: this amended proposal is presented in the context of the long-term strategic vision presented by the Commission for a climate-neutral economy by 2050. It extends the Communication on the European Green Deal in which the Commission proposed a Just Transition Mechanism to complement the legislative and budgetary proposals already presented for the period 2021-2027.

The Just Transition Mechanism includes a Just Transition Fund (JTF) implemented in the framework of cohesion policy. The Commission has proposed to establish the JTF by means of a specific regulation laying down its objective, its geographical coverage, the method for allocating financial resources and the content of the territorial Just Transition Plans necessary to underpin programming.

The overall management of the Fund shall be governed by the provisions laid down in the proposal for a Regulation laying down common provisions for the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund plus, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and establishing financial rules for these Funds and for the Asylum and Migration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Border Management and Visa Instrument.

CONTENT: the main amendments proposed by the Commission relate to the following:

- clarification that the JTF shall support the specific objective of enabling regions and people to address the social, economic and environmental impacts of the transition towards a climate-neutral economy;

- providing that the ERDF, the ESF+, the Cohesion Fund and the JTF shall contribute to the actions of the Union leading to the strengthening of its economic, social and territorial cohesion and may provide joint support for programmes under the "Investment for jobs and growth" objective;

- adjustments to the content requirements for the Partnership Agreement and programmes receiving support from the Just Transition Fund. These set out in particular the obligation to submit territorial just transition plans, as defined in the proposal for a Just Transition Fund Regulation, as an annex to the programmes involving support from the Just Transition Fund;

- description of the mechanism and rules governing the obligatory transfer of ERDF and ESF+ resources to the Just Transition Fund, on the basis of the type of interventions to be supported;

- application of the provisions set out in the Common Provisions Regulation and in the proposal for a Just Transition Fund Regulation to the complementary ERDF/ESF+ resources to ensure that a single set of rules is applicable to all Just Transition Fund resources;

- explanation that the bases for the calculation of the thematic concentration requirements for the ERDF and the ESF+ do not include the amounts transferred from the ERDF and ESF+ as complementary resources to the Just Transition Fund.

The legislative proposal , as well as this amendment of the Commission’s proposal for the Common Provisions Regulation, will feed into the negotiation on the next MFF and expectedly will be integrated into the framework of an overall agreement on the next MFF.

2019/10/09
   EP - Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations announced in plenary (Rule 72)
2019/10/02
   EP - Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations after 1st reading in Parliament
2019/09/03
   EP - NOVAKOV Andrey (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in REGI
2019/09/03
   EP - KREHL Constanze (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in REGI
2019/07/30
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2019/06/25
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2019/06/25
   CSL - Council Meeting
2019/03/27
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum and Migration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Border Management and Visa Instrument (closure of first reading).

The European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission's proposal as follows.

Reintegration of the EARDF

The objectives of the proposed Regulation are to strengthen economic, social and territorial cohesion and to lay down common financial rules for part of the budget of the Union implemented under shared management. Members sought to reintegrate the EARDF into the common provisions Regulation in order to prevent strategic gaps and coordination issues for local investment.

Common rules

The common rules shall be more closely related to the overall objectives of EU policy, such as:

- a more competitive and smarter Europe by promoting innovative and smart economic transformation and strengthening small and medium-sized enterprises;

- a greener, low-carbon transitioning towards a net zero carbon economy and resilient Europe by promoting clean and fair energy transition, green and blue investment, the circular economy, climate change mitigation and adaptation and risk prevention and management;

- more connected Europe by enhancing mobility, including smart and sustainable mobility, and regional ICT connectivity;

- a more social and inclusive Europe implementing the European Pillar of Social Rights;

- a Europe closer to citizens by fostering the sustainable and integrated development of all regions, areas and local initiatives.

Member States shall ensure climate proofing for relevant operations through the entire planning and implementation process.

New horizontal principles

Parliament proposed adding new horizontal principles to ensure the respect for fundamental rights, gender equality, accessibility for persons with disabilities, rational use of resources, environmental protection and the fight against climate change. These principles shall aim at avoiding investments related to production, processing, distribution, storage or combustion of fossil fuels.

Partnerships

For the partnership agreement and each programme, each Member State shall, in accordance with its institutional and legal framework, organise a fully -fledged, effective partnership.

The Member State shall involve those partners in the preparation of partnership agreements and throughout the preparation, implementation and evaluation of programmes including through participation in monitoring committees. In that context, Member States shall allocate an appropriate percentage of the resources coming from the Funds for the administrative capacity building of social partners and civil society organisations.

The Member State shall submit the partnership agreement to the Commission before or at the same time as the first programme, but no later than 30 April 2021.

Measures related to good economic governance

Parliament rejected measures relating to EU regional funding to macroeconomic conditionalities, as proposed by the Commission, in order not to penalise regional authorities for decisions taken by national governments.

The Commission may propose to the Council to gradually suspend, in certain cases, all or part of the commitments intended for one or more of a Member State's programmes after taking into account the economic and social situation of the Member State concerned and the impact of the envisaged suspension on the economy.

Major projects

Since major projects (for which the total eligible cost exceeds EUR 100 million) absorb a considerable part of the Union's expenditure, Parliament proposed that operations exceeding certain thresholds shall continue to be subject to specific approval procedures under the Regulation. This threshold shall be established in relation to the total eligible cost after taking into account the expected net revenues.

To ensure clarity, it is appropriate to define the content of a major project application for such a purpose. The application should contain the necessary information to provide assurance that the financial contribution from the Funds does not result in a substantial loss of jobs in existing locations within the Union. The Member State should submit all required information and the Commission should appraise the major project to determine whether the requested financial contribution is justified.

Funding

The resources for economic, social and territorial cohesion available for budgetary commitment for the period 2021-2027 shall be EUR 378.1 billion in 2018 prices (14 % more than the Commission's proposal of EUR 330.6 billion).

The minimum overall allocation from the Funds, at national level, should be equal to 76% of the budget allocated to each Member State or region over the 2014-2020 period.

Parliament suggested that:

- resources for the Investment for jobs and growth goal shall amount to 97 % of the global resources, i.e., a total of EUR 367 billion (in 2018 prices). Out of this amount, EUR 5.9 billion shall be allocated to the Child Guarantee from the resources under the ESF+;

- less developed regions will keep benefiting from substantial EU support, with co-financing rates of up to 85% (instead of 70 % as proposed by the Commission) and an overall envelope of 61.6 % of the Regional Development, Social and Cohesion funds. The co-financing rate for transition and more developed regions has also been increased, to 65% and 50%, respectively. EUR 1.6 billion (0.4%) should be set aside as additional funding for the outermost regions;

- resources for cross-border projects under Interreg, the European Regional Development Fund, shall amount to EUR 11.3 billion in 2018 prices, 3% (instead of the 2.5% proposed by the Commission) of the global cohesion resources;

- EUR 560 million at 2018 prices from the resources dedicated to the Investment for Jobs and Growth objective shall be allocated to the European Urban Initiative;

- the Social Fund may, in duly justified cases, provide for co-financing rates of up to 90 %, for priorities supporting innovative actions.

Pre-financing rate

In the Commission's proposal, pre-financing shall be paid on an annual basis at a flat rate of 0.5% per year. Parliament has proposed to gradually increase the pre-financing rate over the period covered by the Multiannual Framework to 2% in the last two years of the programming period (2025 and 2026).

Transfers from cohesion policy to InvestEU and the connecting European facility

As of 1 January 2023, Member States, with the agreement of the managing authorities concerned, may allocate, in the request for an amendment of a programme, up to 2% of ERDF, the ESF+, the Cohesion Fund and the EMFF to be contributed to InvestEU and delivered through budgetary guarantees. Up to 3% of the total allocation of each Fund may be further allocated to InvestEU under the mid-term review.

While the Commission's proposal also provides for EUR 10 billion to be made available from the Cohesion Fund to the European Interconnection Facility (EIM), Parliament proposed to limit the transfer to EUR 4 billion.

Mid-term review and programming

Member State shall carry out a mid-term review of each programme financed by the ERDF, ESF+ and Cohesion Fund. This review should allow programmes to be adapted on the basis of their performance, while also providing an opportunity to take into account new challenges, relevant country-specific recommendations adopted in 2024, as well as progress made with national climate and energy plans and the Pillar of European Social Rights.

Documents
2019/02/17
   DE_BUNDESRAT - Contribution
Documents
2019/02/13
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2019/02/13
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2019/02/13
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 460 votes to 170, with 47 abstentions, amendments to the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum and Migration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Border Management and Visa Instrument.

The matter was referred back to the committees responsible for interinstitutional negotiations.

The main amendments adopted in plenary concern the following issues:

Parliament noted that the report noted that it is important for the future of the European Union and its citizens that cohesion policy remains the main investment policy of the Union, keeping its funding in the 2021-2027 period at least at the level of the 2014-2020 programming period.

Reintegration of the EARDF

Members sought to reintegrate the EARDF into the common provisions Regulation in order to prevent strategic gaps and coordination issues for local investment.

Common rules

The common rules shall be more closely related to the overall objectives of EU policy, such as:

- a more competitive and smarter Europe by promoting innovative and smart economic transformation and strengthening small and medium-sized enterprises;

- a greener, low-carbon transitioning towards a net zero carbon economy and resilient Europe by promoting clean and fair energy transition, green and blue investment, the circular economy, climate change mitigation and adaptation and risk prevention and management;

- more connected Europe by enhancing mobility, including smart and sustainable mobility, and regional ICT connectivity;

- a more social and inclusive Europe implementing the European Pillar of Social Rights;

- a Europe closer to citizens by fostering the sustainable and integrated development of all regions, areas and local initiatives.

New horizontal principles

Parliament proposed adding new horizontal principles to ensure the respect for fundamental rights, gender equality, accessibility for persons with disabilities, rational use of resources, environmental protection and the fight against climate change. These principles shall aim at avoiding investments related to production, processing, distribution, storage or combustion of fossil fuels.

Partnerships

For the partnership agreement and each programme, each Member State shall, in accordance with its institutional and legal framework, organise a fully -fledged, effective partnership.

The Member State shall involve those partners in the preparation of partnership agreements and throughout the preparation, implementation and evaluation of programmes including through participation in monitoring committees. In that context, Member States shall allocate an appropriate percentage of the resources coming from the Funds for the administrative capacity building of social partners and civil society organisations.

The Member State shall submit the partnership agreement to the Commission before or at the same time as the first programme, but no later than 30 April 2021.

Measures related to good economic governance

Parliament rejected measures relating to EU regional funding to macroeconomic conditionalities, as proposed by the Commission, in order not to penalise regional authorities for decisions taken by national governments.

Major projects

Since major projects (for which the total eligible cost exceeds EUR 100 million) absorb a considerable part of the Union's expenditure, Members proposed that operations exceeding certain thresholds shall continue to be subject to specific approval procedures under the Regulation. This threshold shall be established in relation to the total eligible cost after taking into account the expected net revenues.

To ensure clarity, it is appropriate to define the content of a major project application for such a purpose. The application should contain the necessary information to provide assurance that the financial contribution from the Funds does not result in a substantial loss of jobs in existing locations within the Union. The Member State should submit all required information and the Commission should appraise the major project to determine whether the requested financial contribution is justified.

Funding

The resources for economic, social and territorial cohesion available for budgetary commitment for the period 2021-2027 shall be EUR 378.1 billion in 2018 prices (14 % more than the Commission's proposal of EUR 330.6 billion).

The minimum overall allocation from the Funds, at national level, should be equal to 76% of the budget allocated to each Member State or region over the 2014-2020 period.

Parliament suggested that:

- resources for the Investment for jobs and growth goal shall amount to 97 % of the global resources, i.e., a total of EUR 367 billion (in 2018 prices). Out of this amount, EUR 5.9 billion shall be allocated to the Child Guarantee from the resources under the ESF+;

- less developed regions will keep benefiting from substantial EU support, with co-financing rates of up to 85% (instead of 70 % as proposed by the Commission) and an overall envelope of 61.6 % of the Regional Development, Social and Cohesion funds. The co-financing rate for transition and more developed regions has also been increased, to 65% and 50%, respectively. EUR 1.6 billion (0.4%) should be set aside as additional funding for the outermost regions;

- resources for cross-border projects under Interreg, the European Regional Development Fund, shall amount to EUR 11.3 billion in 2018 prices, 3% (instead of the 2.5% proposed by the Commission) of the global cohesion resources;

- EUR 560 million at 2018 prices from the resources dedicated to the Investment for Jobs and Growth objective shall be allocated to the European Urban Initiative;

- the Social Fund may, in duly justified cases, provide for co-financing rates of up to 90 %, for priorities supporting innovative actions.

Transfers from cohesion policy to InvestEU and the connecting European facility

As of 1 January 2023, Member States, with the agreement of the managing authorities concerned, may allocate, in the request for an amendment of a programme, up to 2% of ERDF, the ESF+, the Cohesion Fund and the EMFF to be contributed to InvestEU and delivered through budgetary guarantees. Up to 3% of the total allocation of each Fund may be further allocated to InvestEU under the mid-term review.

While the Commission's proposal also provides for EUR 10 billion to be made available from the Cohesion Fund to the European Interconnection Facility (EIM), Parliament proposed to limit the transfer to EUR 4 billion.

Documents
2019/02/13
   EP - Matter referred back to the committee responsible
2019/01/29
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Details

The Committee on Regional Development adopted the joint report by Constanze KREHL (S&D, DE) and Andrey NOVAKOV (EPP, BG) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum and Migration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Border Management and Visa Instrument.

The report noted that it is important for the future of the European Union and its citizens that cohesion policy remains the main investment policy of the Union, keeping its funding in the 2021-2027 period at least at the level of the 2014-2020 programming period. New funding for other areas of activity or programmes of the Union should not be to the detriment of the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus or the Cohesion Fund.

The committee recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission's proposal as follows.

Subject-matter and scope

This Regulation lays down financial rules for the European Regional Development Fund ( 'ERDF' ), the European Social Fund Plus ('ESF+'), the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EARDF), the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund ('EMFF'), the Asylum and Migration Fund ('AMIF'), the Internal Security Fund ('ISF') and the Border Management and Visa Instrument ('BMVI').

Members sought to reintegrate the EAFRD into the common provisions Regulation in order to prevent strategic gaps and coordination issues for local investment.

Member States and the Commission are urged to ensure compliance with relevant State aid rules.

Partnerships

For the Partnership Agreement and each programme, each Member State shall, in accordance with its institutional and legal framework, organise a fully -fledged, effective partnership. That partnership shall include at least the following partners:

- regional, local, urban and other public authorities;

- relevant bodies representing civil society, such as environmental partners, non-governmental organisations, and bodies responsible for promoting social inclusion, fundamental rights, rights of persons with disabilities, gender equality and non-discrimination;

- research institutions and universities.

In accordance with the multi-level governance principle and following a bottom-up approach, the Member State shall involve those partners in the preparation of Partnership Agreements and throughout the preparation, implementation and evaluation of programmes including through participation in monitoring committees. In that context, Member States shall allocate an appropriate percentage of the resources coming from the Funds for the administrative capacity building of social partners and civil society organisations.

The Member State shall submit the Partnership Agreement to the Commission before or at the same time as the submission of the first programme, but not later than 30 April 2021.

New horizontal principles

Members proposed adding new horizontal principles to ensure the respect for fundamental rights, gender equality, persons with disabilities, environmental protection, etc. They shall aim at avoiding investments related to production, processing, distribution, storage or combustion of fossil fuels.

Major projects

Major projects represent a substantial share of Union spending. More specifically, as part of a programme or programmes, the ERDF and the Cohesion Fund may support an operation comprising a series of works, activities or services intended in itself to accomplish an indivisible task of a precise economic or technical nature which has clearly identified goals and for which the total eligible cost exceeds EUR 100 billion (major project). Financial instruments shall not be considered to be major projects.

To ensure clarity, it is appropriate to define the content of a major project application for such a purpose. The application should contain the necessary information to provide assurance that the financial contribution from the Funds does not result in a substantial loss of jobs in existing locations within the Union. The Member State should submit all required information and the Commission should appraise the major project to determine whether the requested financial contribution is justified.

Funding

The resources for economic, social and territorial cohesion available for budgetary commitment for the period 2021-2027 shall be EUR 378.1 billion in 2018 prices (14 % more than the Commission's proposal of EUR 330.6 billion).

The minimum overall allocation from the Funds, at national level, should be equal to 76% of the budget allocated to each Member State or region over the 2014-2020 period.

Resources for the Investment for jobs and growth goal shall amount to 97 % of the global resources, i.e., a total of EUR 367 billion (in 2018 prices). Out of this amount, EUR 5.9 billion shall be allocated to the Child Guarantee from the resources under the ESF+.

Less developed regions will keep benefiting from substantial EU support, with co-financing rates of up to 85% (instead of 70 % as proposed by the Commission) and an overall envelope of 61.6 % of the Regional Development, Social and Cohesion funds.

The co-financing rate for transition and more developed regions has also been increased, to 65% and 50%, respectively. EUR 1.6 billion (0.4%) should be set aside as additional funding for the outermost regions.

Resources for cross-border projects under Interreg, the European Regional Development Fund, shall amount to EUR 11.3 billion in 2018 prices, 3% (instead of the 2.5% proposed by the Commission) of the global cohesion resources.

Members agreed that the Social Fund may, in duly justified cases, provide for co-financing rates of up to 90 %, for priorities supporting innovative actions.

Documents
2019/01/22
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading
2018/12/11
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/12/05
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/12/05
   CofR - Committee of the Regions: opinion
Documents
2018/11/23
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/11/22
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/11/20
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/11/19
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/11/15
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/10/30
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/10/25
   CofA - Court of Auditors: opinion, report
Details

Opinion No 6/2018 concerning the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum and Migration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Border Management and Visa Instrument.

The Court of Auditors has drawn conclusions on each of the Commission's main objectives underlying the policy design presented in its proposal for a Regulation on common provisions (CPR), namely:

Simplification

While fully supporting the Commission’s ambitions to simplify, the Court stresses that the potential benefits of simplification in terms of a reduced administrative burden and efficiency savings are outweighed by greater risks to compliance with the rules and to sound financial management.

Some provisions in the CPR proposal lack clarity, which may lead to different interpretation of rules, affecting legal certainty. Examples are the methodology for the mid-term review, criteria for the assessment of key control requirements and conditions for use of the enhanced proportionality arrangements.

The proposal offers a range of simplification measures, such as simplified cost options, and financing not linked to costs, which, if properly designed and effectively applied by the Member States, have the potential to shift focus from spending to results.

Flexibility in policy implementation

The draft CPR proposes a new element for the 2021-2027 period. This is to have two-stage (5 + 2) programming for three funds, whereby the allocations for the last two years are set in 2025 as part of a mid-term review exercise. The Court expresses concern about the proposed timing of the review, and the administrative burden involved which represents a complication rather than a simplification and calls for further clarification on this issue.

Alignment between funding and EU priorities

The Court welcomes the steps made by the Commission to strengthen the link between the use of EU funding and the EU’s high level economic governance arrangements (the European semester) such as the added emphasis on the implementation of relevant country-specific recommendations within programmes and moving from ex ante conditionalities to simpler enabling conditions, and providing a number of aspects of this for the Commission to consider.

On the other hand, the draft CPR for the next period is not supported by an EU-wide strategy or set of targets. Rather, it is for the Member States to define the main strategic goals. As a result, the proposal does not align funding with EU priorities and is less performance-oriented than in the period 2014-2020.

Accountability arrangements

The proposal seeks to rationalise and streamline accountability arrangements. For example, it replaces exhaustive management verifications by risk-based verifications. While supporting these ambitions, the Court considers that there is scope to tighten up the management and control system in some places.

The Court notes that the proposed enhanced proportionate arrangements for control systems effectively eliminate supervision by the Commission and could expose EU funds to increased risks. This element of the proposal could jeopardise achievements in internal control developed over the last two decades. The Court makes several considerations for the Commission in this area.

2018/10/24
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/10/24
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/10/24
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/10/24
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/10/24
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/10/24
   CZ_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2018/10/22
   DE_BUNDESRAT - Contribution
Documents
2018/10/19
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/10/17
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
Documents
2018/10/16
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/10/11
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/09/28
   EP - GIRLING Julie (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM
2018/09/13
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2018/09/10
   EP - ZDECHOVSKÝ Tomáš (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2018/09/05
   PT_PARLIAMENT - Contribution
Documents
2018/07/22
   ES_CONGRESS - Contribution
Documents
2018/07/05
   EP - NOVAKOV Andrey (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in REGI
2018/07/05
   EP - KREHL Constanze (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in REGI
2018/07/02
   EP - HOFFMANN Iris (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2018/06/28
   EP - JONGERIUS Agnes (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in EMPL
2018/06/28
   EP - MUREŞAN Siegfried (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2018/06/26
   EP - ZŁOTOWSKI Kosma (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in TRAN
2018/06/25
   EP - ZOANĂ Maria Gabriela (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in AGRI
2018/06/21
   EP - VĂLEAN Adina-Ioana (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2018/06/20
   EP - MALETIĆ Ivana (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in ECON
2018/06/11
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2018/05/29
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to strengthen economic, social and territorial cohesion for the period 2021-2027 (Regulation laying down common provisions).

PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.

BACKGROUND: for the next multiannual financial framework covering the period 2021-2017, the Commission proposes to modernise cohesion policy to help redress imbalances within and between Member States.

Given that the rules applicable were overly complex and fragmented between the different funds and the various forms of financing, this proposal for a Regulation aims to establish common provisions for seven funds , namely (i) the Cohesion Fund (CF), (ii) the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF), (iii) the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), (iv) the European Social Fund plus (ESF+), (v) the Asylum and Migration Fund (AMIF), (vi) the Border Management and Visa Instrument (BMVI) and (vii) the Internal Security Fund (ISF).

CONTENT: this proposal for a Regulation - presented for a Union of 27 Member States - seeks to create a common set of simplified and consolidated rules covering seven EU funds.

The main elements of the Commission proposal are as follows:

Shared management and partnership : part of the budget of the Union allocated to the Funds should be implemented by the Commission under shared management with Member States. Each Member State should organise partnerships with local and regional authorities, urban and public authorities, economic and social partners, civil society and bodies promoting social inclusion, fundamental rights, gender equality, non-discrimination and the rights of people with disabilities.

The contribution of EU programmes to the overall objective of increasing the share of EU spending contributing to climate objectives to 25% shall be tracked through an EU climate marker system.

Strategic approach : the Commission proposes to reduce the eleven thematic objectives used for the period 2014-2020 to five clear policy objectives :

a smarter Europe by promoting innovative and smart economic transformation; a greener, low-carbon Europe by promoting clean and fair energy transition, green and blue investment, the circular economy, climate adaptation and risk prevention and management; a more connected Europe by enhancing mobility and regional ICT connectivity; a more social Europe implementing the European Pillar of Social Rights; a Europe closer to citizens by fostering the sustainable and integrated development of urban, rural and coastal areas and local initiatives.

Simplification : the proposal aims at significantly reducing the unnecessary administrative burden for beneficiaries and management bodies while maintaining a high level of assurance on legality and regularity. Among other things, it provides for:

the use of simplified cost options, i.e. flat-rate reimbursement, standard scales of unit costs or flat-rate amounts; the possibility of payments based on conditions; the abolition of specific rules for revenue generating investments and of the procedure applicable to major projects; simplified financing, for example through the use of the ‘seal of excellence’; the extension of the single audit principle, fewer controls and an enhanced proportionate approach for programmes with a low error rate.

The proposal also increases the flexibility needed to meet emerging needs:

allowing limited financial transfers between EU programmes; creating flexibility for the ERDF, ESF+ and the Cohesion Fund: only the first 5 years will be programmed initially. Allocations for the last 2 years will be made on the basis of a substantial and in-depth mid-term review leading to corresponding reprogramming in 2025; enabling voluntary transfer of resources towards the five policy windows of the InvestEU instruments to benefit from an EU-level budgetary guarantee mechanism.

Lastly, the proposal seeks to align the programmes more closely with EU priorities and increase their effectiveness, in particular by creating a closer link with the European Semester to improve the investment climate in Europe. Conditionality linked to the European Semester shall be simplified. In particular, country-specific recommendations (CSRs) shall be taken into account in programming at least on two occasions: at the beginning of the programming and during the mid-term review.

Proposed overall budget : the Commission proposal for a multiannual financial framework sets an envelope of EUR 330 billion for economic, social and territorial cohesion for the period 2021-2027:

European Regional Development Fund (ERDF): EUR 200.62 billion , of which (i) investment for jobs and growth: EUR 190.75 billion; (II) European territorial cooperation: EUR 8.43 billion; (iii) outermost and sparsely populated regions: EUR 1.44 billion. Cohesion Fund (CF): EUR 41.34 billion , of which contribution to the Connecting Europe Facility - Transport: EUR 10 billion. European Social Fund+: EUR 88.64 billion .

The Commission proposal for the financing of the EMFF, AMIF, BMVI and ISF shall be included in fund specific Regulations.

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0043/2019 - Andrey Novakov et Constanze Krehl - Am 427 13/02/2019 12:16:43.000 #

2019/02/13 Outcome: -: 592, +: 75, 0: 8
?? CY MT EE EL LU DK IE LV SI AT LT HR FI SK HU BG SE BE NL PT CZ GB FR RO PL ES IT DE
Total
1
2
6
4
15
6
13
8
8
8
18
10
11
12
12
14
16
16
19
25
20
20
62
71
28
46
50
66
86
icon: ENF ENF
35

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3
2

Germany ENF

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
35

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
18

NI

Against (1)

1

Denmark NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3

France NI

2

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ECR ECR
62

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

3

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2
4
icon: S&D S&D
170

Cyprus S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Finland S&D

2
3

Hungary S&D

2

Belgium S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

4
icon: PPE PPE
196

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0043/2019 - Andrey Novakov et Constanze Krehl - Am 7 13/02/2019 12:17:13.000 #

2019/02/13 Outcome: +: 525, -: 97, 0: 49
DE ES IT FR RO PT SE NL BG BE EL FI HR DK AT GB CZ LT IE SI LU MT LV SK PL EE CY ?? HU
Total
85
50
66
71
28
20
16
25
16
19
14
12
11
13
18
63
20
10
8
8
6
6
8
11
46
3
2
1
13
icon: PPE PPE
193

Greece PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
170

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Hungary S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Romania ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Czechia ALDE

4

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
17

Germany NI

1

France NI

2

Denmark NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
35

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ECR ECR
63
5

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ECR

3

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3
icon: ENF ENF
35

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

4

Poland ENF

2

A8-0043/2019 - Andrey Novakov et Constanze Krehl - Am 20 13/02/2019 12:17:26.000 #

2019/02/13 Outcome: +: 500, -: 116, 0: 52
IT DE FR ES RO GB PT EL HU AT IE HR CZ PL BG SI MT SK DK LU LV BE SE CY FI NL ?? LT EE
Total
65
84
71
50
28
63
20
15
14
17
8
11
20
46
15
8
6
10
13
6
8
18
16
2
12
25
1
10
4
icon: PPE PPE
194

United Kingdom PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
167

Hungary S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Slovakia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
35

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
34

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

4

Austria ENF

3

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: NI NI
18

Germany NI

2

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

Hungary NI

2

Denmark NI

1

NI

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
62
5

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65
4

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

A8-0043/2019 - Andrey Novakov et Constanze Krehl - Am 42 13/02/2019 12:17:55.000 #

2019/02/13 Outcome: +: 447, -: 195, 0: 29
IT GB PL ES RO PT HU DE AT EL CZ SK IE HR BG MT DK SE CY LU ?? LV FI SI EE NL BE LT FR
Total
66
62
46
50
28
20
14
84
18
15
19
11
8
11
16
6
13
16
2
6
1
8
12
8
4
25
19
10
71
icon: S&D S&D
170

Hungary S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Finland S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Belgium S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania S&D

2
icon: ECR ECR
63

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1
2

Netherlands ECR

2

Belgium ECR

3

Lithuania ECR

1
icon: PPE PPE
193

United Kingdom PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3
5

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

4

Lithuania PPE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

For (1)

6
icon: EFDD EFDD
35

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
17

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Hungary NI

2

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Denmark NI

1

NI

For (1)

1

France NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ENF ENF
35

United Kingdom ENF

4

Poland ENF

2

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1
4

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Czechia ALDE

4

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Sweden ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

A8-0043/2019 - Andrey Novakov et Constanze Krehl - Am 60 13/02/2019 12:18:51.000 #

2019/02/13 Outcome: +: 538, -: 80, 0: 56
FR IT ES RO DE PT NL CZ SE BG BE AT HU DK EL GB FI SK LT HR IE SI PL MT LV LU EE CY ??
Total
71
66
49
28
86
20
25
20
16
16
19
18
14
13
15
63
12
11
10
11
8
8
46
6
8
6
4
2
1
icon: S&D S&D
170

Netherlands S&D

3

Hungary S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
195

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

Ireland PPE

Against (1)

4
5

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Romania ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

Abstain (3)