BETA


2018/2718(RSP) Resolution on the transport pillar of the Connecting Europe Facility after 2020

Progress: Procedure completed

Legal Basis:
RoP 132-p2

Events

2018/11/16
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2018/05/31
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2018/05/31
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution on the Transport Pillar of the Connecting Europe Facility after 2020.

The resolution was tabled by the EPP, S&D, ECR, and ALDE groups.

Parliament recalls that the CEF is aimed at accelerating investment in transport infrastructure and leveraging funding from both the public and the private sectors. It considered that the CEF is one of the most successful EU programmes as calls have largely been oversubscribed. By the end of 2017, CEF Transport had already allocated EUR 21.3 billion in grants for TEN-T projects, triggering EUR 41.6 billion of total investments. During 2018, additional grant agreements will be signed for a blending call combining CEF grants with private finance, including from the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI).

In this context, Parliament called on the Commission and Member States to remain committed to the CEF’s main policy objectives in the transport sector: by 2030 – completion of the TEN-T core network, including the deployment of Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR), Motorways of the Sea (MoS) and the European Rail Traffic Management Systems (ERTMS), and the transition towards clean, and connected mobility, including an EU backbone of alternative-fuels charging infrastructure by 2025; and progress towards the completion of the TEN-T comprehensive network by 2050.

Members acknowledged that the full benefit and potential of EU investment in the TEN-T network could only be realised after the completion of the core and comprehensive networks. They asked the Commission to bear in mind that the completion of these networks will require significant investments, part of which will depend on continued EU support, or they risk coming to a standstill.

They noted that the Commission proposal to allocate EUR 42 265 million to the CEF for the period 2021-2027 , but regretted that in constant prices the allocation to CEF–Transport amounts to EUR 11 384 million and the contribution from the Cohesion Fund amounts to EUR 10 000 million, which represent cuts of 12 % and 13 % respectively . Parliament could not accept that funds allocated to the transport pillar are the only ones that have been decreased (there have been increases for telecommunications and digital projects). The Commission was asked to reconsider the amount proposed. Members noted that an insufficient budget for transport would put the completion of the TEN-T network at risk and that this would in fact depreciate investments from public finances already made. They stressed, furthermore, that the amount earmarked under the direct management of the CEF framework from the Cohesion Fund in the next MFF 2021- 2027 must at least remain at the same level as in the previous MFF 2014-2020 and that this amount must be sufficient to complete, during the next MFF 2021-2027, those projects funded from the earmarked Cohesion Fund under the current CEF.

The resolution also made the following points:

the Commission should further reinforce and ensure the complementarity between the CEF and other programmes such as Horizon Europe and the InvestEU Fund, in order to maintain and promote the clear objectives of the programme, avoid overlaps and optimise budgetary resources; the future sectoral policy guidelines and the CEF instrument should be made more flexible in order to facilitate synergies and to be more responsive to new technological developments and priorities such as digitalisation, the Commission should repeat the blending call for proposals , which Members judged successful, and continue using a stronger CEF in the form of grants, to be combined with EU and non-EU financial instruments, where possible; the Commission should devote particular attention to the outermost regions by extending the core network of ports to improve connectivity and these regions should have up to 85 % of cofinancing in all transport modes in order to improve their access to calls and to create regular maritime connections with mainland areas;

Lastly, Parliament considered that the Commission should use the CEF to support the development of dual-use civilian-defence infrastructure along the TEN-T network.

Documents
2018/05/31
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2018/05/28
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2018/05/28
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2018/05/28
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2018/05/28
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2018/05/28
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2018/05/28
   Joint motion for resolution
Documents
2018/05/28
   EP - Debate in Parliament

Documents

Activities

Votes

RC-B8-0242/2018 - § 25 31/05/2018 12:22:36.000 #

2018/05/31 Outcome: +: 368, -: 211, 0: 51
PL ES RO IT BE PT SK CZ HU BG HR LT NL EE FI LU DE LV SI FR AT MT ?? CY IE GB DK SE EL
Total
44
49
25
56
19
20
11
17
16
13
11
10
22
6
11
5
83
6
4
64
18
6
1
5
9
58
7
16
16
icon: PPE PPE
177

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Latvia PPE

2

Slovenia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Ireland PPE

3

United Kingdom PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Sweden PPE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Romania ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Finland ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Germany ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
55

Romania ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Czechia ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1
2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
165

Belgium S&D

Against (1)

3

Slovakia S&D

2

Czechia S&D

For (1)

3

Croatia S&D

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Finland S&D

Against (1)

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Greece S&D

3
icon: NI NI
17

Hungary NI

2

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

Abstain (1)

1

NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
37

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
31

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

Abstain (1)

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

4

Austria Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
4

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2018-0242_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2018-0242_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2018-0243_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2018-0243_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2018-0245_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2018-0245_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2018-0246_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2018-0246_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2018-0247_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2018-0247_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-8-2018-0242_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-8-2018-0242_EN.html
events/0/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180528&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/2
date
2018-05-31T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0237_EN.html title: T8-0237/2018
summary
events/2
date
2018-05-31T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0237_EN.html title: T8-0237/2018
summary
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2018-0242&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2018-0242_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2018-0243&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2018-0243_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2018-0245&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2018-0245_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2018-0246&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2018-0246_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2018-0247&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2018-0247_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=P8-RC-2018-0242&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-8-2018-0242_EN.html
docs/6/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0237
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0237_EN.html
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 132-p2
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 123-p2
activities
  • date: 2018-05-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180528&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2018-05-31T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0237 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0237/2018 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
    docs
    • date: 2018-05-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2018-0242&language=EN title: B8-0242/2018 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2018-05-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2018-0243&language=EN title: B8-0243/2018 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2018-05-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2018-0245&language=EN title: B8-0245/2018 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2018-05-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2018-0246&language=EN title: B8-0246/2018 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2018-05-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2018-0247&language=EN title: B8-0247/2018 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2018-05-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=P8-RC-2018-0242&language=EN title: RC-B8-0242/2018 type: Joint motion for resolution
    • date: 2018-11-16T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=31237&j=0&l=en title: SP(2018)515 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
    events
    • date: 2018-05-28T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180528&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2018-05-31T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=31237&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
    • date: 2018-05-31T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0237 title: T8-0237/2018 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution on the Transport Pillar of the Connecting Europe Facility after 2020. The resolution was tabled by the EPP, S&D, ECR, and ALDE groups. Parliament recalls that the CEF is aimed at accelerating investment in transport infrastructure and leveraging funding from both the public and the private sectors. It considered that the CEF is one of the most successful EU programmes as calls have largely been oversubscribed. By the end of 2017, CEF Transport had already allocated EUR 21.3 billion in grants for TEN-T projects, triggering EUR 41.6 billion of total investments. During 2018, additional grant agreements will be signed for a blending call combining CEF grants with private finance, including from the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI). In this context, Parliament called on the Commission and Member States to remain committed to the CEF’s main policy objectives in the transport sector: by 2030 – completion of the TEN-T core network, including the deployment of Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR), Motorways of the Sea (MoS) and the European Rail Traffic Management Systems (ERTMS), and the transition towards clean, and connected mobility, including an EU backbone of alternative-fuels charging infrastructure by 2025; and progress towards the completion of the TEN-T comprehensive network by 2050. Members acknowledged that the full benefit and potential of EU investment in the TEN-T network could only be realised after the completion of the core and comprehensive networks. They asked the Commission to bear in mind that the completion of these networks will require significant investments, part of which will depend on continued EU support, or they risk coming to a standstill. They noted that the Commission proposal to allocate EUR 42 265 million to the CEF for the period 2021-2027 , but regretted that in constant prices the allocation to CEF–Transport amounts to EUR 11 384 million and the contribution from the Cohesion Fund amounts to EUR 10 000 million, which represent cuts of 12 % and 13 % respectively . Parliament could not accept that funds allocated to the transport pillar are the only ones that have been decreased (there have been increases for telecommunications and digital projects). The Commission was asked to reconsider the amount proposed. Members noted that an insufficient budget for transport would put the completion of the TEN-T network at risk and that this would in fact depreciate investments from public finances already made. They stressed, furthermore, that the amount earmarked under the direct management of the CEF framework from the Cohesion Fund in the next MFF 2021- 2027 must at least remain at the same level as in the previous MFF 2014-2020 and that this amount must be sufficient to complete, during the next MFF 2021-2027, those projects funded from the earmarked Cohesion Fund under the current CEF. The resolution also made the following points: the Commission should further reinforce and ensure the complementarity between the CEF and other programmes such as Horizon Europe and the InvestEU Fund, in order to maintain and promote the clear objectives of the programme, avoid overlaps and optimise budgetary resources; the future sectoral policy guidelines and the CEF instrument should be made more flexible in order to facilitate synergies and to be more responsive to new technological developments and priorities such as digitalisation, the Commission should repeat the blending call for proposals , which Members judged successful, and continue using a stronger CEF in the form of grants, to be combined with EU and non-EU financial instruments, where possible; the Commission should devote particular attention to the outermost regions by extending the core network of ports to improve connectivity and these regions should have up to 85 % of cofinancing in all transport modes in order to improve their access to calls and to create regular maritime connections with mainland areas; Lastly, Parliament considered that the Commission should use the CEF to support the development of dual-use civilian-defence infrastructure along the TEN-T network.
    • date: 2018-05-31T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
    links
    other
      procedure/subject
      Old
      • 3.20.11 Trans-European transport networks
      New
      3.20.11
      Trans-European transport networks
      activities/1
      date
      2018-05-31T00:00:00
      docs
      url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0237 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0237/2018
      body
      EP
      type
      Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
      procedure/stage_reached
      Old
      Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
      New
      Procedure completed
      activities/0
      date
      2018-05-28T00:00:00
      body
      EP
      type
      Debate in plenary scheduled
      activities/0/date
      Old
      2018-05-31T00:00:00
      New
      2018-05-28T00:00:00
      activities/0/docs
      • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180528&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
      activities/0/type
      Old
      Vote in plenary scheduled
      New
      Debate in Parliament
      procedure/subject/1
      3.30.20 Trans-European communications networks
      procedure/subject/2
      3.60.06 Trans-European energy networks
      procedure/title
      Old
      Connecting Europe Facility after 2020
      New
      Resolution on the transport pillar of the Connecting Europe Facility after 2020
      activities/0/type
      Old
      Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
      New
      Debate in plenary scheduled
      activities/1
      date
      2018-05-31T00:00:00
      body
      EP
      type
      Vote in plenary scheduled
      activities
      • date: 2018-05-28T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
      committees
        links
        other
          procedure
          reference
          2018/2718(RSP)
          title
          Connecting Europe Facility after 2020
          legal_basis
          Rules of Procedure EP 123-p2
          stage_reached
          Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
          subtype
          Resolution on statement
          type
          RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
          subject