BETA


2019/2522(RSP) Resolution on the draft Commission implementing decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified maize 5307 (SYN-Ø53Ø7-1)

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ENVI PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa (icon: PPE PPE), BALAS Guillaume (icon: S&D S&D), MAZURONIS Valentinas (icon: ALDE ALDE), STAES Bart (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), EVI Eleonora (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 112-p2

Events

2019/07/03
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2019/01/31
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2019/01/31
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2019/01/31
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 385 votes to 204, with 55 abstentions, a resolution objecting to the draft Commission implementing decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified maize 5307 (SYN-Ø53Ø7-1) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on genetically modified food and feed.

The application for marketing authorisation was submitted on 7 April 2011 by Syngenta Crop Protection AG, via its affiliate Syngenta Crop Protection NV/SA, to the competent German national authority.

Comments from the Parliament and the Member States

Members noted that the genetically modified maize 5307 produces a new insecticidal protein, eCry3.1Ab, which is toxic to some beetles and weevils and also expresses the phosphommanose isomerase (PMI) protein, which is used as a selection marker.

In its 2015 opinion, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) concluded that it was not in a position to complete its risk assessment for food and feed due to shortcomings in the 28-day toxicity study provided by the applicant. The applicant then submitted a new toxicity study, as requested by EFSA. This did not meet all the requirements of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) guidelines for repeated-dose 28-day oral toxicity studies in rodents.

Parliament highlighted the following points:

- although Cry proteins (Bt toxins) have been recognised as having adjuvant properties, which means that they could enhance the allergenic properties of other foods, this aspect was not analysed by EFSA. Bt toxins could thus be mixed with allergens in food and feed, such as soybean;

- it has been shown that the toxicity of Bt toxins can be enhanced by interactions with other compounds such as plant enzymes, other Bt toxins and herbicide spray residues;

- testing of the isolated Bt toxin does not allow conclusions to be drawn about its health impact after consumption.

Member States expressed many criticisms during the three-month consultation period following the publication of EFSA's opinions in 2015 and 2018. According to one competent authority, the expression levels of eCry3.1Ab protein in genetically modified maize grains 5307 exceed the default maximum residue limits of 0.01 mg/kg as set out in Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

Decision-making process

The Commission has repeatedly deplored the fact that since the current GMO authorisation procedure entered into force, each authorisation decision has been taken by the Commission without the support of the opinion of the Member States’ Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health. Thus, the referral of the dossier to the Commission for a final decision, which should have been an exception, has become the rule in the decision-making process on authorisations of genetically modified food and feed.

On the basis of these considerations, Parliament considered that the Commission's implementing decision was not compatible with Union law, which requires that bases are set out in order to ensure a high level of protection of human life and health, animal health and welfare, the environment and consumer interests, while ensuring the proper functioning of the internal market.

As a result, Parliament called on the Commission to:

- withdraw its draft implementing decision;

- suspend any implementing decision on applications for authorisation of genetically modified organisms until the authorisation procedure has been revised in order to remedy the shortcomings of the current procedure, which has proved inadequate;

- withdraw proposals for authorisations of GMOs – whether for cultivation or for food and feed purposes – if the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health does not deliver an opinion.

Parliament reiterated its commitment to make progress in its work on the Commission's proposal to amend Regulation (EU) No 182/2011. It called on the Council to give urgent attention to completing its work on this Commission proposal.

Documents
2019/01/31
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2018/12/06
   EP - PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2018/12/06
   EP - BALAS Guillaume (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2018/12/06
   EP - MAZURONIS Valentinas (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2018/12/06
   EP - STAES Bart (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2018/12/06
   EP - EVI Eleonora (EFDD) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI

Documents

Votes

B8-0074/2019 - Résolution 31/01/2019 12:25:48.000 #

2019/01/31 Outcome: +: 385, -: 204, 0: 55
IT FR DE EL AT BG PL LU LV PT HR DK CY MT RO SK SI NL IE GB BE EE ?? LT SE FI CZ HU ES
Total
64
61
81
15
17
16
45
6
6
19
9
11
5
5
27
10
5
24
10
60
21
5
1
9
16
12
18
18
46
icon: S&D S&D
162

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

1

Malta S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

For (2)

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

Abstain (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
41

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2
icon: ENF ENF
32

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

Poland ENF

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom ENF

4

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
65

Germany ECR

3

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Sweden ECR

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Czechia ECR

2
icon: NI NI
14

France NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

2

NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
60

Germany ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

4

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

Against (1)

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ALDE

3

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: PPE PPE
187

Luxembourg PPE

3

Croatia PPE

Against (1)

4

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Slovenia PPE

Against (1)

4

United Kingdom PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

4

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Finland PPE

2

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/rapporteur/3
name
BOYLAN Lynn
date
2018-12-06T00:00:00
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0074_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0074_EN.html
events/1
date
2019-01-31T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0058_EN.html title: T8-0058/2019
summary
events/1
date
2019-01-31T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0058_EN.html title: T8-0058/2019
summary
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0074&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0074_EN.html
docs/1/body
EC
events/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0058
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0058_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
associated
False
rapporteur
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
associated
False
date
rapporteur
docs/1/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32143&j=0&l=en
commission
  • body: EC dg: Agriculture and Rural Development commissioner: HOGAN Phil
committees
  • type: Responsible Committee body: EP committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI associated: False date: 2018-12-06T00:00:00 2018-12-06T00:00:00 2018-12-06T00:00:00 2018-12-06T00:00:00 2018-12-06T00:00:00 2018-12-06T00:00:00 rapporteur: name: PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE name: BALAS Guillaume group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D name: MAZURONIS Valentinas group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE name: BOYLAN Lynn group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL name: STAES Bart group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE name: EVI Eleonora group: Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy abbr: EFDD
docs
  • date: 2019-01-31T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0074&language=EN title: B8-0074/2019 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2019-07-03T00:00:00 docs: title: SP(2019)392 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2019-01-31T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=32143&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2019-01-31T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0058 title: T8-0058/2019 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 385 votes to 204, with 55 abstentions, a resolution objecting to the draft Commission implementing decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified maize 5307 (SYN-Ø53Ø7-1) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on genetically modified food and feed. The application for marketing authorisation was submitted on 7 April 2011 by Syngenta Crop Protection AG, via its affiliate Syngenta Crop Protection NV/SA, to the competent German national authority. Comments from the Parliament and the Member States Members noted that the genetically modified maize 5307 produces a new insecticidal protein, eCry3.1Ab, which is toxic to some beetles and weevils and also expresses the phosphommanose isomerase (PMI) protein, which is used as a selection marker. In its 2015 opinion, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) concluded that it was not in a position to complete its risk assessment for food and feed due to shortcomings in the 28-day toxicity study provided by the applicant. The applicant then submitted a new toxicity study, as requested by EFSA. This did not meet all the requirements of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) guidelines for repeated-dose 28-day oral toxicity studies in rodents. Parliament highlighted the following points: - although Cry proteins (Bt toxins) have been recognised as having adjuvant properties, which means that they could enhance the allergenic properties of other foods, this aspect was not analysed by EFSA. Bt toxins could thus be mixed with allergens in food and feed, such as soybean; - it has been shown that the toxicity of Bt toxins can be enhanced by interactions with other compounds such as plant enzymes, other Bt toxins and herbicide spray residues; - testing of the isolated Bt toxin does not allow conclusions to be drawn about its health impact after consumption. Member States expressed many criticisms during the three-month consultation period following the publication of EFSA's opinions in 2015 and 2018. According to one competent authority, the expression levels of eCry3.1Ab protein in genetically modified maize grains 5307 exceed the default maximum residue limits of 0.01 mg/kg as set out in Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Decision-making process The Commission has repeatedly deplored the fact that since the current GMO authorisation procedure entered into force, each authorisation decision has been taken by the Commission without the support of the opinion of the Member States’ Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health. Thus, the referral of the dossier to the Commission for a final decision, which should have been an exception, has become the rule in the decision-making process on authorisations of genetically modified food and feed. On the basis of these considerations, Parliament considered that the Commission's implementing decision was not compatible with Union law, which requires that bases are set out in order to ensure a high level of protection of human life and health, animal health and welfare, the environment and consumer interests, while ensuring the proper functioning of the internal market. As a result, Parliament called on the Commission to: - withdraw its draft implementing decision; - suspend any implementing decision on applications for authorisation of genetically modified organisms until the authorisation procedure has been revised in order to remedy the shortcomings of the current procedure, which has proved inadequate; - withdraw proposals for authorisations of GMOs – whether for cultivation or for food and feed purposes – if the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health does not deliver an opinion. Parliament reiterated its commitment to make progress in its work on the Commission's proposal to amend Regulation (EU) No 182/2011. It called on the Council to give urgent attention to completing its work on this Commission proposal.
  • date: 2019-01-31T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
procedure
reference
2019/2522(RSP)
title
Resolution on the draft Commission implementing decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified maize 5307 (SYN-Ø53Ø7-1)
subject
type
RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
subtype
Resolution on implementing act or powers
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure EP 112-p2
stage_reached
Procedure completed
dossier_of_the_committee
ENVI/8/15238