BETA


2022/2500(DEA) Identifying high-risk third countries with strategic deficiencies: adding Burkina Faso, Cayman Islands, Haiti, Jordan, Mali, Morocco, the Philippines, Senegal, and South Sudan to the table in point I of the Annex and deleting The Bahamas, Botswana,Ghana, Iraq and Mauritius from this table

Progress: Procedure completed - delegated act enters into force

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Joint Responsible Committee []
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
R, u, l, e, s, , o, f, , P, r, o, c, e, d, u, r, e, , E, P, , 5, 9

Events

2022/03/23
   European Commission - Document attached to the procedure
Documents
2022/02/18
   EP - Delegated act not objected by Parliament
2022/01/19
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2022/01/19
   EP - Referral to joint committee announced in Parliament
2022/01/10
   Initial period for examining delegated act 1.0 month(s)
2022/01/07
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

This Delegated Regulation concerns the adoption of a list of high risk third countries under the 4th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (Directive (EU) 2015/849). The aim is to update the EU list on the basis of the latest available Financial Action Task Force (FATF) list.

BACKGROUND: Directive (EU) 2015/849 empowers the Commission to adopt delegated acts to identify third countries with strategic AML/CFT deficiencies that pose a significant threat to the EU financial system (‘high risk third countries’) by taking into account their strategic deficiencies and laying down the criteria on which the Commission's assessment is to be based.

On 14 July 2016, the Commission adopted Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 which identified a number of third countries that have strategic deficiencies in their AML/CFT regimes that pose significant threats to the financial system of the Union. Since the last amendments to Regulation (EU) 2016/1675, the FATF updated its list of ‘Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring’ as follows:

- at its Plenary meeting of February 2021, the FATF added Burkina Faso, Cayman Islands, Morocco, and Senegal to its list;

- at its Plenary meeting of June 2021, the FATF added Haiti, the Philippines and South Sudan and deleted Ghana from its list;

- at its Plenary meeting of October 2021, the FATF added Jordan, Mali and Turkey and deleted Botswana and Mauritius from its list.

In addition, in the fourth quarter 2021, the Commission finalised its assessment of The Bahamas and Iraq. Taking account of the progress made by these countries, the Commission considered that The Bahamas and Iraq should be deleted from the EU’s list of high risk third countries.

It is necessary to continue to update Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 to take into account information from international organisations and standard setters in the field of anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism, such as FATF public statements, mutual evaluation or detailed assessment reports, and published follow-up reports.

CONTENT: this Delegated Regulation amends Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 supplementing Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the following:

Addition to the list of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675

The Commission to add Burkina Faso, Cayman Islands, Haiti, Jordan, Mali, Morocco, the Philippines, Senegal, and South Sudan as having strategic deficiencies in their AML/CFT regime to the list of the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 as countries presenting strategic deficiencies in their AML/CFT regime that pose significant threats to the financial system of the Union.

These countries provided a written high-level political commitment to address the identified deficiencies and developed an action plan with the FATF for this purpose. In order to take into account the level of commitment that has been demonstrated in the context of the FATF, these high-risk third countries are listed in the table in point I of the Annex to the Delegated Regulation (“High-risk third countries which have provided a written high-level political commitment to address the identified deficiencies and have developed an action plan with FATF”).

Deletion from the list of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675

The Commission proposed to remove the Bahamas, Botswana, Ghana, Iraq and Mauritius from the table in point I of the Annex.

The FATF welcomed significant progress made by Botswana, Ghana and Mauritius in improving its AML/CFT regime and noted that Botswana, Ghana and Mauritius have established the legal and regulatory framework to meet the commitments in their action plans regarding the strategic deficiencies that the FATF had identified. The Commission’s analysis concluded that, according to available information, The Bahamas, Botswana, Ghana, Iraq and Mauritius no longer have strategic deficiencies in their AML/CFT regime.

Other third countries publicly identified by the FATF

In October 2021, the FATF publicly identified Turkey as having strategic deficiencies in its AML/CFT regime. Turkey made a high-level political commitment to work with the FATF to strengthen the effectiveness of its AML/CFT regime. Since the adoption of its mutual evaluation report in October 2019, Turkey has made progress on a number of the recommended actions in this report to improve its AML/CFT regime.

In the context of the accession negotiations, the Commission developed further mitigating measures with Turkey in order to ensure alignment with Directive (EU) 2015/849. Subject to the implementation of the commitments taken by Turkey, the Commission considers that those additional mitigating measures allow addressing sufficiently the remaining deficiencies. Therefore, there is no need to adopt further measures under the Anti-Money Laundering of Directive at this stage.

Legal elements

As a direct consequence of the adoption of this Delegated Regulation, obliged entities in all Member States are bound to apply enhanced customer due diligence measures according to Directive (EU) 2015/849 with respect to business relationships or transactions involving countries that remain included in the Annex to this Delegated Regulation.

Furthermore, the Financial Regulation prohibits persons and entities implementing Union funds or budgetary guarantees from entering into new or renewed operations with entities incorporated or established in countries included in this Delegated Regulation pursuant to Directive (EU) 2015/849, except when an action is physically implemented in these countries and subject to the absence of other risk factors. Implementing partners must transpose those requirements also in their own contracts with selected financial intermediaries.

Non-legislative basic document

Documents

Documents

  • Document attached to the procedure: C(2022)1876
  • Non-legislative basic document published: C(2021)04335
  • Document attached to the procedure: C(2022)1876

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0
type
Joint Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
committee
associated
False
committees/0
type
Joint Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
committee
associated
False
docs/0/body
Old
EC
New
European Commission
events/0/summary/21
Non-legislative basic document
events/1
date
2022-01-10T00:00:00
type
Initial period for examining delegated act 1.0 month(s)
events/1
date
2022-01-10T00:00:00
type
Initial period for examining delegated act 1 month(s)
body
EP/CSL
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
  • CJ12/9/08082
New
CJ12/9/08082
procedure/legal_basis
Old
  • Rules of Procedure EP 59
New
Rules of Procedure EP 59
procedure/subtype
Old
Examination of delegated act
New
  • Examination of delegated act
  • Supplementing
  • 2013/0025(COD)
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 59
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 58
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 59
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 58
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 59
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 58
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 59
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 58
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 59
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 58
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 59
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 58
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 59
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 58
committees/0
type
Joint Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
committee
associated
False
committees/0
type
Joint Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
committee
associated
False
committees/0
type
Joint Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
committee
associated
False
committees/0
type
Joint Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
committee
associated
False
committees/0
type
Joint Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
committee
associated
False
committees/0
type
Joint Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
committee
associated
False
committees/0
type
Joint Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
committee
associated
False
committees/0
type
Joint Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
committee
associated
False
committees/0
type
Joint Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
committee
associated
False
committees/0
type
Joint Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
committee
associated
False
committees/0
type
Joint Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
committee
associated
False
committees/0
type
Joint Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
committee
associated
False
committees/0
type
Joint Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
committee
associated
False
committees/0
type
Joint Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
committee
associated
False
committees/0
type
Joint Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
committee
associated
False
committees/0
type
Joint Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
committee
associated
False
committees/0
type
Joint Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
committee
associated
False
committees/0
type
Joint Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
committee
associated
False
docs/0
date
2022-03-23T00:00:00
docs
title: C(2022)1876
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/0
date
2022-01-07T00:00:00
docs
url: https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/regdel/web/delegatedActsLinks/C(2021)04335 title: C(2021)04335
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
events/4
date
2022-02-18T00:00:00
type
Delegated act not objected by Parliament
body
EP
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Procedure completed - delegated act enters into force
events/2
date
2022-01-19T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament
body
EP
events/3
date
2022-01-19T00:00:00
type
Referral to joint committee announced in Parliament
body
EP
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
  • CJ12/9/08082
procedure/legal_basis
  • Rules of Procedure EP 58
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
events/0/summary
  • This Delegated Regulation concerns the adoption of a list of high risk third countries under the 4th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (Directive (EU) 2015/849). The aim is to update the EU list on the basis of the latest available Financial Action Task Force (FATF) list.
  • BACKGROUND: Directive (EU) 2015/849 empowers the Commission to adopt delegated acts to identify third countries with strategic AML/CFT deficiencies that pose a significant threat to the EU financial system (‘high risk third countries’) by taking into account their strategic deficiencies and laying down the criteria on which the Commission's assessment is to be based.
  • On 14 July 2016, the Commission adopted Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 which identified a number of third countries that have strategic deficiencies in their AML/CFT regimes that pose significant threats to the financial system of the Union. Since the last amendments to Regulation (EU) 2016/1675, the FATF updated its list of ‘Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring’ as follows:
  • - at its Plenary meeting of February 2021, the FATF added Burkina Faso, Cayman Islands, Morocco, and Senegal to its list;
  • - at its Plenary meeting of June 2021, the FATF added Haiti, the Philippines and South Sudan and deleted Ghana from its list;
  • - at its Plenary meeting of October 2021, the FATF added Jordan, Mali and Turkey and deleted Botswana and Mauritius from its list.
  • In addition, in the fourth quarter 2021, the Commission finalised its assessment of The Bahamas and Iraq. Taking account of the progress made by these countries, the Commission considered that The Bahamas and Iraq should be deleted from the EU’s list of high risk third countries.
  • It is necessary to continue to update Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 to take into account information from international organisations and standard setters in the field of anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism, such as FATF public statements, mutual evaluation or detailed assessment reports, and published follow-up reports.
  • CONTENT: this Delegated Regulation amends Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 supplementing Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the following:
  • Addition to the list of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675
  • The Commission to add Burkina Faso, Cayman Islands, Haiti, Jordan, Mali, Morocco, the Philippines, Senegal, and South Sudan as having strategic deficiencies in their AML/CFT regime to the list of the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 as countries presenting strategic deficiencies in their AML/CFT regime that pose significant threats to the financial system of the Union.
  • These countries provided a written high-level political commitment to address the identified deficiencies and developed an action plan with the FATF for this purpose. In order to take into account the level of commitment that has been demonstrated in the context of the FATF, these high-risk third countries are listed in the table in point I of the Annex to the Delegated Regulation (“High-risk third countries which have provided a written high-level political commitment to address the identified deficiencies and have developed an action plan with FATF”).
  • Deletion from the list of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675
  • The Commission proposed to remove the Bahamas, Botswana, Ghana, Iraq and Mauritius from the table in point I of the Annex.
  • The FATF welcomed significant progress made by Botswana, Ghana and Mauritius in improving its AML/CFT regime and noted that Botswana, Ghana and Mauritius have established the legal and regulatory framework to meet the commitments in their action plans regarding the strategic deficiencies that the FATF had identified. The Commission’s analysis concluded that, according to available information, The Bahamas, Botswana, Ghana, Iraq and Mauritius no longer have strategic deficiencies in their AML/CFT regime.
  • Other third countries publicly identified by the FATF
  • In October 2021, the FATF publicly identified Turkey as having strategic deficiencies in its AML/CFT regime. Turkey made a high-level political commitment to work with the FATF to strengthen the effectiveness of its AML/CFT regime. Since the adoption of its mutual evaluation report in October 2019, Turkey has made progress on a number of the recommended actions in this report to improve its AML/CFT regime.
  • In the context of the accession negotiations, the Commission developed further mitigating measures with Turkey in order to ensure alignment with Directive (EU) 2015/849. Subject to the implementation of the commitments taken by Turkey, the Commission considers that those additional mitigating measures allow addressing sufficiently the remaining deficiencies. Therefore, there is no need to adopt further measures under the Anti-Money Laundering of Directive at this stage.
  • Legal elements
  • As a direct consequence of the adoption of this Delegated Regulation, obliged entities in all Member States are bound to apply enhanced customer due diligence measures according to Directive (EU) 2015/849 with respect to business relationships or transactions involving countries that remain included in the Annex to this Delegated Regulation.
  • Furthermore, the Financial Regulation prohibits persons and entities implementing Union funds or budgetary guarantees from entering into new or renewed operations with entities incorporated or established in countries included in this Delegated Regulation pursuant to Directive (EU) 2015/849, except when an action is physically implemented in these countries and subject to the absence of other risk factors. Implementing partners must transpose those requirements also in their own contracts with selected financial intermediaries.