Progress: Procedure completed
Legal Basis:
RoP 132-p2Events
The European Parliament adopted by 450 votes to 132, with 55 abstentions, a resolution on national vetoes to undermine the global tax deal.
The text adopted in plenary was tabled by the EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens/EFA groups and Members.
As of 4 November 2021, 137 out of 141 members of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting, including all EU Member States, agreed on the reform of the international tax system through a two-pillar solution to address the challenges stemming from the digitalisation of the economy, including placing multilaterally agreed limitations on profit shifting and tax competition with the introduction of a global minimum rate of 15 % . The agreement is the result of a broad compromise and the outcome of several rounds of negotiations which took place over several years. The public revenue deriving from the implementation of the Pillar II Directive in the EU would be particularly significant given the unprecedented impact of the combination of the Russian aggression in Ukraine, the disturbance of global supply chains, and the need to ensure the post-pandemic economic recovery and the investments needed to deliver the EU climate goals .
In June 2022, Hungary retracted its support for the EU law implementing the global agreement. Poland also opposed it in April, before coming back on board.
General considerations
Parliament asserted that existing international tax rules are largely outdated and unable to address the increasing digitalisation of the economy and effectively curb tax evasion and avoidance. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the reform of the rules through the adoption of the OECD/G20 global tax deal, to ensure that the international, EU and national tax systems are fit for the new economic, social and technological challenges of the 21st century.
National vetoes have consistently hampered progress in many important areas of taxation. Parliament condemned the fact that national vetoes in taxation matters have been abused by certain Member States to achieve concessions in other policy areas. The existence of these vetoes threatens to perpetuate harmful tax practices and social injustice that undermine the Union’s ability to function effectively, foster a level playing field and protect the best interests of its citizens and SMEs. Members reiterated the urgent need to establish a broad tax base and reduce the space for tax evasion, tax fraud and aggressive tax planning.
Recommendations for action and areas for reform
Parliament called on the Council to swiftly adopt the Pillar II Directive to ensure the agreement is effective by January 2023.
Deploring the fact that a single Member State has the capacity to keep both the implementation of such a historic deal and 26 other Member States at a standstill, Parliament urged Hungary to put an immediate end to its blockage of the global tax deal in the Council .
It also urged the Commission and the Council:
- not to engage in political bargaining with Member States who abuse their national vetoes.;
- refrain from approving the Hungarian national recovery and resilience plan until Hungary has fully complied with all criteria set out in the regulation, in particular with the country-specific recommendations in the field of the rule of law, the independence of the judiciary and the prevention and detection of and fight against fraud, conflicts of interest and corruption.
Lastly, Parliament reminded Member States that unanimity decision making in the EU requires a very high level of responsibility, in line with the principle of sincere cooperation, as set out in the EU Treaty. For the longer term, Member States should consider the benefit of transitioning to qualified majority voting , and the Commission should relaunch the idea to gradually introduce majority voting on tax matters.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2022)505
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0290/2022
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0339/2022
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0340/2022
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0341/2022
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0342/2022
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0343/2022
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0344/2022
- Joint motion for resolution: RC-B9-0339/2022
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0339/2022
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0340/2022
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0341/2022
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0342/2022
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0343/2022
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0344/2022
- Joint motion for resolution: RC-B9-0339/2022
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2022)505
Activities
- Paul TANG
Institutional Motions (2)
- José GUSMÃO
Institutional Motions (2)
- Claude GRUFFAT
Institutional Motions (2)
- Zdzisław KRASNODĘBSKI
Institutional Motions (1)
- Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO
Institutional Motions (1)
- Jacek SARYUSZ-WOLSKI
Institutional Motions (1)
- Ernest URTASUN
Institutional Motions (1)
- Andżelika Anna MOŻDŻANOWSKA
Institutional Motions (1)
Votes
Vetos nationaux visant à saper l’accord fiscal mondial - National vetoes to undermine the global tax deal - Einzelstaatliche Vetos zur Unterwanderung des globalen Steuerabkommens - RC-B9-0339/2022 - Après le § 3 - Am 1 #
RC-B9-0339/2022 - Après le § 4 - Am 2 #
RC-B9-0339/2022 - Après le § 8 - Am 3 #
RC-B9-0339/2022 - Après le § 8 - Am 4 #
RC-B9-0339/2022 - Après le § 8 - Am 5 #
RC-B9-0339/2022 - Après le § 11 - Am 6 #
RC-B9-0339/2022 - Après le § 13 - Am 7 #
RC-B9-0339/2022 - Après le § 15 - Am 8 #
RC-B9-0339/2022 - § 16 - Am 11 #
RC-B9-0339/2022 - § 16 - Am 12 #
RC-B9-0339/2022 - § 16 - Am 13 #
RC-B9-0339/2022 - Après le § 16 - Am 14 #
RC-B9-0339/2022 - Après le § 16 - Am 15 #
RC-B9-0339/2022 - Après le § 16 - Am 16 #
RC-B9-0339/2022 - § 17 #
| ES | DE | IT | FR | RO | EL | BE | AT | HR | LT | LV | BG | DK | PT | EE | SI | FI | CZ | LU | CY | SK | MT | HU | PL | IE | SE | NL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total |
55
|
87
|
69
|
68
|
28
|
18
|
21
|
17
|
12
|
10
|
7
|
15
|
14
|
18
|
7
|
8
|
13
|
19
|
6
|
6
|
12
|
5
|
15
|
49
|
12
|
19
|
28
|
|
 Verts/ALE |
68
|
3
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (24)Alexandra GEESE, Anna CAVAZZINI, Anna DEPARNAY-GRUNENBERG, Damian BOESELAGER, Daniel FREUND, Erik MARQUARDT, Hannah NEUMANN, Henrike HAHN, Jutta PAULUS, Katrin LANGENSIEPEN, Malte GALLÉE, Manuela RIPA, Martin HÄUSLING, Michael BLOSS, Nico SEMSROTT, Niklas NIENASS, Patrick BREYER, Pierrette HERZBERGER-FOFANA, Rasmus ANDRESEN, Reinhard BÜTIKOFER, Romeo FRANZ, Sergey LAGODINSKY, Terry REINTKE, Viola VON CRAMON-TAUBADEL
|
3
|
France Verts/ALEFor (11)Against (1) |
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
|||||||||||
 S&D |
132
|
Spain S&DFor (20)Adriana MALDONADO LÓPEZ, Alicia HOMS GINEL, Clara AGUILERA, Cristina MAESTRE, César LUENA, Domènec RUIZ DEVESA, Eider GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL, Estrella DURÁ FERRANDIS, Ibán GARCÍA DEL BLANCO, Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ, Isabel GARCÍA MUÑOZ, Javi LÓPEZ, Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ, Jonás FERNÁNDEZ, Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR, Lina GÁLVEZ, Marcos ROS SEMPERE, Mónica Silvana GONZÁLEZ, Nacho SÁNCHEZ AMOR, Nicolás GONZÁLEZ CASARES
Abstain (1) |
Germany S&DFor (10)Against (2) |
Italy S&DFor (14)Against (2) |
France S&DFor (4)Against (2) |
Romania S&DAgainst (2) |
2
|
3
|
Austria S&DFor (4)Against (1) |
4
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
Portugal S&DFor (8)Against (1) |
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
Poland S&DAgainst (2) |
5
|
Netherlands S&DFor (3)Against (3) |
|
 PPE |
160
|
Spain PPEAgainst (2) |
Germany PPEFor (15)Against (15) |
Italy PPEFor (6)Against (3) |
France PPEFor (7)Against (1) |
Romania PPEFor (9)Against (4) |
4
|
Austria PPEFor (3)Against (1)Abstain (2) |
4
|
Lithuania PPEFor (3)Against (1) |
1
|
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (2)Abstain (1) |
1
|
Portugal PPEAgainst (5) |
1
|
4
|
3
|
Czechia PPEAbstain (1) |
2
|
2
|
Slovakia PPEFor (1)Against (2)Abstain (1) |
1
|
Poland PPEFor (13)Against (2) |
4
|
4
|
Netherlands PPEAgainst (5) |
||
 Renew |
95
|
Spain RenewFor (5)Against (1) |
Germany RenewAgainst (6) |
2
|
France RenewFor (17)Against (6) |
Romania RenewFor (7)Against (1) |
1
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
Denmark RenewFor (2)Against (4) |
3
|
2
|
2
|
Czechia RenewAgainst (5) |
2
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Netherlands RenewAgainst (7) |
|||
 The Left |
33
|
Spain The LeftAbstain (2) |
4
|
3
|
Greece The LeftFor (5) |
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||||
 NI |
34
|
3
|
3
|
Italy NIFor (7)Against (2) |
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
Hungary NIAgainst (10) |
||||||||||||||||||
 ID |
56
|
Germany IDAgainst (7) |
Italy IDAbstain (23)
Alessandra BASSO,
Alessandro PANZA,
Angelo CIOCCA,
Annalisa TARDINO,
Antonio Maria RINALDI,
Danilo Oscar LANCINI,
Elena LIZZI,
Gianantonio DA RE,
Gianna GANCIA,
Isabella TOVAGLIERI,
Mara BIZZOTTO,
Marco CAMPOMENOSI,
Marco DREOSTO,
Marco ZANNI,
Massimo CASANOVA,
Matteo ADINOLFI,
Paolo BORCHIA,
Rosanna CONTE,
Silvia SARDONE,
Simona BALDASSARRE,
Stefania ZAMBELLI,
Susanna CECCARDI,
Valentino GRANT
|
14
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||
 ECR |
60
|
Spain ECR |
1
|
Italy ECRAgainst (7) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
Czechia ECRAgainst (3)Abstain (1) |
1
|
Poland ECRAgainst (24)
Adam BIELAN,
Andżelika Anna MOŻDŻANOWSKA,
Anna FOTYGA,
Anna ZALEWSKA,
Beata KEMPA,
Beata MAZUREK,
Bogdan RZOŃCA,
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI,
Elżbieta KRUK,
Elżbieta RAFALSKA,
Grzegorz TOBISZOWSKI,
Izabela-Helena KLOC,
Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA,
Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI,
Joanna KOPCIŃSKA,
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI,
Krzysztof JURGIEL,
Patryk JAKI,
Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO,
Ryszard CZARNECKI,
Tomasz Piotr PORĘBA,
Witold Jan WASZCZYKOWSKI,
Zbigniew KUŹMIUK,
Zdzisław KRASNODĘBSKI
Abstain (1) |
3
|
Netherlands ECRAgainst (5) |
RC-B9-0339/2022 - § 19 - Am 17 #
RC-B9-0339/2022 - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) #
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| docs/7 |
|
| docs/7 |
|
| events/1 |
|
| events/1 |
|
| events/2 |
|
| events/2/summary |
|
| docs/7 |
|
| events/1 |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting plenary debate/voteNew
Procedure completed |
| docs/6 |
|
| forecasts |
|
| procedure/title |
Old
National vetoes to undermine the global tax dealNew
Resolution on national vetoes to undermine the global tax deal |
| docs/0/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2022-0339_EN.html
|
| docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2022-0340_EN.html
|
| docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2022-0341_EN.html
|
| docs/3/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2022-0342_EN.html
|
| docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2022-0343_EN.html
|
| docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2022-0344_EN.html
|
| events/0/docs |
|
| forecasts |
|
| docs |
|