Activities of Amelia ANDERSDOTTER related to 2013/2080(INI)
Shadow reports (1)
REPORT on Implementation report on the regulatory framework for electronic communications PDF (215 KB) DOC (111 KB)
Amendments (12)
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 19 a (new)
Citation 19 a (new)
- having regard to Recommendation 2010/572/EU (Recommendation on regulated access to Next Generation Access Networks)
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the aims of the framework are to promote a sectoral ecosystem of competition and investment, benefitting consumers and users, while consolidatingtributing to the development of the internal market infor communications;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
Recital L
L. whereas the rollout of ultrafast internet access is slow, representing only 3.4 % of all fixed lines, and user demand appears weak, with only about 2 % of households subscribing to such lines1 functional separation, i.e. the obligation of a vertically integrated operator to place the activities related to the wholesale provision of relevant access products in an independently operating internal business unit, remains a remedy of last resort;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital M
Recital M
M. whereas issues regarding competition both between traditionalelectronic communications services providers and between them and newer over-the-topinformation society services providers deserve attention;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital N
Recital N
N. whereas the framework should remain neutral and the same rules apply to equivalentfully substitutable electronic communications services;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital N a (new)
Recital N a (new)
Na. whereas innovation and the development of new technologies and infrastructures should be considered for assessing the impact of the legal framework on the options offered to the users and consumers;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital N b (new)
Recital N b (new)
Nb. whereas obstructions to competition continue to be present on many networks and considering the failure to define and apply a principle of net neutrality to ensure non-discrimination of services for end-users;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point vii
Paragraph 4 – point vii
(vii) the impact of services fully substitutable to those provided by traditional providers but not necessarily covered by the framework:; some clarifications regarding the reach of the framework's technological neutrality would be needed;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point xvii a (new)
Paragraph 4 – point xvii a (new)
(xviia) the Internet has become a crucial infrastructure for the conduct of a wide array of economic and social activities;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point i
Paragraph 5 – point i
(i) ensuring that fully substitutable services that meet the requirements of the ECS definition of art 2 (c) of the Framework Directive are subject to the same rules;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point iv a (new)
Paragraph 5 – point iv a (new)
(iva) ensuring that the framework is fit for the digital age and delivers an Internet ecosystem that support the entire economy;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Stresses that non-discrimination of information in the sending, transmitting and receiving phase is necessary for encouraging innovation and eliminate entry barriers;