Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ITRE | TRAUTMANN Catherine ( S&D) | HÖKMARK Gunnar ( PPE), VĂLEAN Adina-Ioana ( ALDE), ANDERSDOTTER Amelia ( Verts/ALE), CHICHESTER Giles ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | IMCO | HARBOUR Malcolm ( ECR) | Matteo SALVINI ( ENF) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution on the implementation report on the regulatory framework for electronic communications.
Parliament underlined the fact that while the framework has made substantial progress towards achieving its aims, the EU telecoms market remains fragmented along national borders, making it difficult for businesses and citizens to fully benefit from a single market. It considered that only by having a competitive European market in high speed broadband services can innovation, economic growth and job creation be stimulated and competitive prices offered to end users.
According to the resolution, the revision of the regulatory framework should follow these objectives:
ensure that consumers have access to comprehensive and comprehensible information on internet connection speeds to enable them to compare the services offered by different operators; ensure that fully substitutable services are subject to the same rules; further promote effective and sustainable competition, which is the main driver of efficient investment over time; increase competition on the European high-speed broadband market; provide a stable and sustainable framework for investment; ensure harmonised, consistent and effective application; facilitate the development of pan-European providers and the provision of crossborder business services; ensure that the framework is fit for the digital age and delivers an internet ecosystem that support the entire economy; increase user confidence in the internal market in communications, including through measures to implement the future regulatory framework for the protection of personal data and measures to increase the security of electronic communications on the internal market.
Parliament insisted in particular for the following aspects to be considered:
the overdue review of the universal service obligation , including the obligation to offer broadband internet access at a fair price in response to the urgent need to reduce the digital divide; the competence of NRAs for all issues, including spectrum, that are addressed by the framework; cooperation between the NRAs and national competition authorities; the symmetric obligations relating to network access (Article 12 FD); the impact of services that are fully substitutable to those provided by traditional providers; identification of transnational markets, as a first step at least with respect to business services; BEREC and its functioning as well as the extension of the scope of its competences; freedom of access to content for all and net neutrality building ; the regulation of equipment, including bundling of equipment and operating systems; recent global developments in cybersecurity and cyberespionage.
Consistency, regulatory certainty and competition : Members considered that all the provisions proposed by the Commission, including a single European authorisation, consumer aspects and technical arrangements for spectrum auctions, could play an important role with a view to creating a single market for communications, but that they need to be assessed in the light of that objective to maintain consistency and provide regulatory certainty so as to ensure fair and balanced competition in which European players stand every chance.
Spectrum coordination : Members are convinced that increased spectrum coordination combined with the application of common principles for spectrum use rights across the Union would constitute a key remedy for tackling the problem of lack of predictability regarding spectrum availability, thus encouraging investment and economies of scale. They emphasised that a pan-European auctioning of 4G and 5G wireless services , with a limited number of licensees collectively serving the whole territory of the EU, would enable pan-European wireless services, eroding the bases upon which roaming is built.
Stimulating innovation : Members called for a mix of different measures and all available technologies should be explored and offered to consumers, so as to prevent the deterioration of service, the blocking of access and the slowing of traffic over networks.
Consumer protection : Member States are invited to give the consumer aspects of electronic communications a much higher priority. In this regard, Members stressed the importance of:
enhanced consumer information requirements regarding service restrictions, device subsidies and traffic management; ensure consistent enforcement of the ban on misleading advertising; switching, ease of number portability in a dynamic market, contract transparency and provision of information to consumers regarding contract changes; implementing reinforced requirements for equivalent access for disabled users.
As regards the 112 common emergency telephone number , Members called for improvements regarding caller location response time. They welcomed the Commission’s work on the practical implementation of the 116 numbers, especially the missing child hotline (116000) and also called for better promotion of these numbers by the Commission.
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the own-initiative report by Catherine TRAUTMANN (S&D, FR) on Implementation report on the regulatory framework for electronic communications.
Regretting the delay by Member States in transposing the 2009 changes to the regulatory framework for electronic communications, Members drew attention to the fragmentation of the internal market in communications.
They support a competitive European market in high-speed broadband services and stated that the review of the regulatory framework should following these objectives:
ensure that consumers have access to comprehensive and comprehensible information on internet connection speeds to enable them to compare the services offered by different operators; ensure that fully substitutable services are subject to the same rules; further promote effective and sustainable competition, which is the main driver of efficient investment over time; increase competition on the European high-speed broadband market; provide a stable and sustainable framework for investment; ensure harmonised, consistent and effective application; facilitate the development of pan-European providers and the provision of crossborder business services; ensure that the framework is fit for the digital age and delivers an internet ecosystem that support the entire economy; increase user confidence in the internal market in communications, including through measures to implement the future regulatory framework for the protection of personal data and measures to increase the security of electronic communications on the internal market.
The report insisted in particular for the following aspects to be considered in a review of the entire regulatory framework:
the overdue review of the universal service obligation , including the obligation to offer broadband internet access at a fair price in response to the urgent need to reduce the digital divide; the competence of NRAs for all issues, including spectrum, that are addressed by the framework; cooperation between the NRAs and national competition authorities; the symmetric obligations relating to network access (Article 12 FD); the impact of services that are fully substitutable to those provided by traditional providers; identification of transnational markets, as a first step at least with respect to business services; BEREC and its functioning as well as the extension of the scope of its competences; freedom of access to content for all and net neutrality building ; the regulation of equipment, including bundling of equipment and operating systems; recent global developments in cybersecurity and cyberespionage.
Members are convinced that increased spectrum coordination combined with the application of common principles for spectrum use rights across the Union would constitute a key remedy for tackling the problem of lack of predictability regarding spectrum availability, thus encouraging investment and economies of scale. The report emphasised that a pan-European auctioning of 4G and 5G wireless services , with a limited number of licensees collectively serving the whole territory of the EU, would enable pan-European wireless services, eroding the bases upon which roaming is built.
Member States are invited to give the consumer aspects of electronic communications a much higher priority. In this regard, Members stressed the importance of:
enhanced consumer information requirements regarding service restrictions, device subsidies and traffic management; ensure consistent enforcement of the ban on misleading advertising; switching, ease of number portability in a dynamic market, contract transparency and provision of information to consumers regarding contract changes; implementing reinforced requirements for equivalent access for disabled users.
As regards the 112 common emergency telephone number, Members called for improvements regarding caller location response time. They welcomed the Commission’s work on the practical implementation of the 116 numbers, especially the missing child hotline (116000) and also called for better promotion of these numbers by the Commission.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)62
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0454/2013
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0313/2013
- Committee opinion: PE510.798
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE514.877
- Committee draft report: PE514.610
- Committee draft report: PE514.610
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE514.877
- Committee opinion: PE510.798
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)62
Activities
- Giles CHICHESTER
- Malcolm HARBOUR
- László SURJÁN
- Catherine TRAUTMANN
- Marino BALDINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Francesco DE ANGELIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jolanta Emilia HIBNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gunnar HÖKMARK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alajos MÉSZÁROS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andreas MÖLZER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jens ROHDE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Joanna Katarzyna SKRZYDLEWSKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marita ULVSKOG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jarosław WAŁĘSA
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
99 |
2013/2080(INI)
2013/08/28
IMCO
8 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. Shares the view that despite progress being made, the European Union is only taking small steps towards achieving the Digital Agenda's broadband objectives within the targeted time frame;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the importance of enhanced consumer information requirements regarding service restrictions, device subsidies, and traffic management, and calls on the Member States and the Commission to coherently enforce the ban on misleading advertising;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Emphasises that there is a potential for anti-competitive and discriminative behaviour in traffic management and calls therefore on the Member States to prevent any violation of net neutrality;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Underlines that the development of end to end quality of service capabilities in addition to traditional best effort delivery could undermine the principle of net neutrality;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Notes that depending on the wireless carrier, consumers' phones might have restricted functionality regarding tethering options while at the same time the carrier advertises unlimited data usage; asks therefore the Commission and BEREC to look at potential misleading advertisement aspects involved in this regard;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Emphasises the significant process which has been made in providing entry level universal broadband access, although progress is very uneven;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Underlines that in order to reduce costs and increase efficiency in the deployment of the high-speed electronic communication infrastructure, an efficient increase in broadband coverage and provision of discrimination-free access and use of the internet can only be achieved through a mix of different measures and all available technologies;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Emphasises that the increasing amount of data volumes, limited availability of spectrum resources and the convergence of technologies, equipment and content require intelligent data traffic management and different methods of dissemination such as cooperation between digital terrestrial broadcasting and wireless broadband networks;
source: PE-516.862
2013/09/04
ITRE
91 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 9 a (new) - having regard to Recommendation 2010/572/EU (Recommendation on regulated access to Next Generation Access Networks), (This is a new citation)
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the aims of the framework are to promote a sectoral ecosystem of competition and investment, benefiting consumers and users, while con
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the aims of the framework are to promote a sectoral ecosystem of competition and investment, benefiting consumers and users, while con
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas a relevant, stable and consistent framework is essential to promote investment and competition
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas a relevant, stable and consistent framework is essential to promote investment, innovation and competition;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K a (new) Ka. Whereas pan-European business users have not been recognised as a separate market segment resulting in a lack of standardised wholesale offers, unnecessary costs and a fragmented Internal Market.
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K b (new) Kb. Whereas functional separation, i.e. the separation of wholesale access products into a separate and independently operating entity, is currently only envisaged as an exceptional measure.
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K a (new) Ka. whereas functional separation, i.e. the obligation of a vertically integrated operator to place the activities related to the wholesale provision of relevant access products in an independently operating internal business unit, remains a remedy of last resort;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K b (new) Kb. whereas the promotion of competition in the provision of electronic communications networks and services is one of the key policy objectives established in article 8 of the Framework Directive;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K c (new) Kc. whereas despite an overall more competitive environment, some electronic communications markets remain uncompetitive, particularly the provision of fixed broadband lines, with incumbent operators still retaining an average 42.3% market share and the provision of services to business users, with incumbent operators retaining market shares of 70% and above in many Member States;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas the rollout of high-speed broadband internet access has been gradual, as 54% of European households have access to speeds of over 30 Mbps but European consumers have been slow to adopt this type of access (only 4.2% of households); whereas the rollout of ultrafast internet access
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 11 a (new) - having regard to Recommendation 2010/572/EU (Recommendation on regulated access to Next Generation Access Networks),
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas the roll-out of
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas the rollout of ultrafast internet access is
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L a (new) La. Whereas transparency in network traffic management is insufficient in itself to ensure net neutrality;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L a (new) La. whereas effective and sustainable competition is an important driver of efficient investment over time;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas issues regarding competition both between
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas issues regarding competition both between traditional or electronic communications services providers and between them and
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas issues regarding competition both between
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M a (new) Ma. whereas the promotion of competition in the provision of electronic communications networks and services is one of the key policy objectives established in article 8 of the Framework Directive;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 17 a (new) - having regard to the recent work done by BEREC on net neutrality,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M b (new) Mb. whereas the regulatory framework has promoted competition in the provision of electronic communications networks and services, to the benefit of consumers;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas the framework should remain neutral and the same rules apply to
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas the framework should remain neutral and the same rules apply to
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas the framework should remain neutral and the same rules should apply to
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N a (new) Na. Whereas 4G deployment in Europe has been hindered by a lack of sufficient coordination in radio spectrum allocations, in particular Member States delay in carrying out the authorisation process in order to allow the use of the 800 MHz band for electronic communication services by 1 January 2013 as stipulated by the Radio Spectrum Policy Program;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N b (new) Nb. whereas the Radio Policy Spectrum Policy Program asks the European Commission to review the use of the spectrum below 1GHz and assess whether additional spectrum could be freed and made available for new applications, such as the 700 Mhz band;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N a (new) Na. whereas innovation and the development of new technologies and infrastructures should be considered for assessing the impact of the legal framework on the options offered to the users and consumers;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N b (new) Nb. whereas obstructions to competition continue to be present on many networks and considering the failure to define and apply a principle of net neutrality to ensure non-discrimination of services for end-users;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N a (new) Na. Whereas effective and sustainable competition is an important driver of efficient investment over time;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Regrets the delay by Member States in transposing the 2009 changes to the regulatory framework and draws attention to the fragmentation of the internal market in communications caused by the varying implementation of the regulatory framework in the 27 Member States;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 19 a (new) - having regard to Recommendation 2010/572/EU (Recommendation on regulated access to Next Generation Access Networks)
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Underlines the fact that while the framework has made substantial progress towards achieving its aims
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Considers that only by having a competitive European market in high-speed broadband services can innovation, economic growth and job creation be stimulated and competitive prices offered to end users;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Considers that the next review should aim at a further evolution of the framework, with a view to addressing any weaknesses and taking account of market, social and technological developments and future trends;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point i (i) the overdue review of the universal service obligation,
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point iii Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point vi a (new) (via) the response to functional separation, which should continue to be a last resort in the armoury of the NRAs and which must form part of a strategy that does not undermine enterprises by inducing their fragmentation, as they are also subject to competition from outside the EU that is being exacerbated by buyouts and merger-takeovers;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point vii (vii) the impact of services substitutable to those provided by traditional providers but not necessarily covered by the framework: some clarifications regarding the reach of the framework’s technological neutrality would be needed, as would clarifications on the dichotomy between services in the ‘information society’ bracket and those in the ‘electronic communications’ bracket;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point vii (vii) the impact of services that are fully substitutable to those provided by traditional providers
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point vii (vii) the impact of services fully substitutable to those provided by traditional providers
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point viii (viii) the
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. Whereas the differences in the enforcement and implementation of the regulatory framework has led to higher costs for operators active in more than one country; thereby hindering investments and the development of a single market for telecoms
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point ix (ix) the lifting of regulation
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point ix (ix) the lifting of regulation
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point ix (ix) the lifting of regulation
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point xi a (new) (xia) strengthening the application of the functional separation remedy by removing the exceptional character of the obligation and thus allowing NRAs to impose such remedy under the same circumstances as other obligations available under the Access Directive;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point xiii (xiii) pan-European services and operators, taking into account the (unused) provision of Art 15(4) FD allowing the Commission to identify transnational markets; more attention could be awarded, in this respect, to ‘business-to-business’ electronic communications;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point xiii (xiii) pan-European services and operators, taking into account the (unused) provision of Art 15(4) FD allowing the Commission to identify transnational markets; recommends that the review of the framework includes consideration of:
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point xiii (xiii) pan-European services and operators, taking into account the (unused) provision of Art 15(4) FD allowing the Commission to identify transnational markets. More focus should be given to the competitive provision of communications services to European businesses and to the effective and consistent application of business grade remedies across Europe;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point xiii (xiii) pan-European services and operators, taking into account the (unused) provision of Art 15(4) FD allowing the Commission to identify transnational markets. More focus should be given to the competitive provision of communications services to European businesses and to the effective and consistent application of business grade remedies across Europe;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point xiii a (new) (xiiia) strengthening the application of the functional separation remedy by removing the exceptional character of the obligation and thus allowing the national regulatory authorities to impose such remedy under the same circumstances as other obligations available under the Access Directive.
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point xiii – point a (new) a) Identification of transnational markets, as a first step at least with respect to business services;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new) Cb. Whereas the European Commission has not made use of the possibility to adopt a decision identifying transnational markets as specified in the provision of Art 15(4) FD
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point xiii – point b (new) b) enabling providers to notify BEREC that they intend to serve such markets;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point xiii – point c (new) c) supervision of providers serving such markets by BEREC;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point xiv (xiv) BEREC and its functioning as well as the extension of the scope of its competences;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point xv (xv) freedom of access to content for all, following Art 1(3a) FD and net neutrality, building on Art 8(4)(g) FD;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point xvii a (new) Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point xvii a (new) (xviia) the Internet has become a crucial infrastructure for the conduct of a wide array of economic and social activities;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point xiii a (new) (xiiia) Suggests that strengthening the application of the functional separation remedy by removing the exceptional character of the obligation could increase incentives for network investments and further develop the internal market in electronic communications;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point i (i) ensuring that fully substitutable services are subject to the same rules; to this end the ECS definition of art 2 (c) of the Framework Directive should be taken into consideration;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point i (i) ensuring that fully substitutable services that meet the requirements of the ECS definition of art 2 (c) of the Framework Directive are subject to the same rules;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point i a (new) (ia) ensuring that consumers have access to comprehensive and comprehensible information on internet connection speeds to enable them to compare the services offered by different operators;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the aims of the framework are to promote a
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point i a (new) (ia) further promoting effective and sustainable competition, which is the main driver of efficient investment over time;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point i a (new) (ia) increasing competition on the European high-speed broadband market;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point iv (iv) facilitating the development of pan- European providers
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point iv (iv) facilitating the development of pan- European providers
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point iv a (new) (iva) that the overall aim of the framework should be to deliver an Internet ecosystem that best supports the EU's entire economy and society, and that this framework is designed and fit for the digital age, rather than based on legacy regulatory frameworks;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point iv a (new) (iva) increasing user confidence in the internal market in communications, including through measures to implement the future regulatory framework for the protection of personal data and measures to increase the security of electronic communications on the internal market;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point iv a (new) (iva) ensuring that the framework is fit for the digital age and delivers an Internet ecosystem that support the entire economy;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point iv a (new) (iva) ensuring that the framework is fit for the digital age and delivers an Internet ecosystem that support the entire economy;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Believes that the overall aim of the framework should continue to be the promotion of a sectoral ecosystem of competition and investment which benefits consumers and users, while
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Believes that the overall aim of the framework should continue to be the promotion of a sectoral ecosystem of competition, innovation and investment which benefits consumers and users, while consolidating
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the aims of the framework are to promote a sectoral ecosystem of
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Believes that the overall aims of the framework should
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Believes that the overall aim of the framework should continue to be the promotion of a sectoral e
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Believes that the overall aim of the framework should continue to be the promotion of a sectoral ecosystem of effective and sustainable competition and efficient investment which benefits consumers and users, while con
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Believes that
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – introductory part 8. Believes that
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 (new) Believes that to encourage investments and to create regulatory certainty a European electronic communications provider that wish to start activity outside its "home" Member State should only be required to submit a single notification to the competent authority of the "home" Member State;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – point a (new) (a) Highlights that national competent authorities shall aim to apply regulatory principles, procedures and conditions for spectrum usage which do not impede European electronic communications providers from providing networks and services in several Member States or across the Union;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – point b (new) (b) Is convinced that increased spectrum coordination combined with the application of common principles for right of use of spectrum across the Union would be an important remedy to tackle the lack of predictability regarding spectrum availability, thus encouraging investments and economic of scale;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – point c (new) (c) Stresses that incentive payments and/or the revoking of right of use in case of failure to use relevant radio spectrum could be important measures to free up sufficient harmonised radio spectrum to stimulate high-capacity wireless broadband services;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – point d (new) (d) Highlights that a pan-European auctioning of 4 and 5G wireless services, with a limited number of licensees that collectively serve the whole territory of the EU, would enable pan-European wireless services, eroding the fundaments upon which roaming is built;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the aims of the framework are to promote a sectoral ecosystem of competition
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses that non-discrimination of information in the sending, transmitting and receiving phase is necessary for encouraging innovation and eliminate entry barriers;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission, therefore, to
source: PE-514.877
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE514.610New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-PR-514610_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE514.877New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AM-514877_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE510.798&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-510798_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131024&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2013-10-24-TOC_EN.html |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-313&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0313_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-454New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0454_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ITRE/7/12552New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|