22 Amendments of Nils TORVALDS related to 2016/0238(COD)
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
Recital 4 a (new)
(4 a) In accordance with Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, the maximum sustainable yield exploitation rate is to be achieved by 2015 where possible and, on a progressive, incremental basis at the latest by 2020 for all stocks.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) For the achievement of the objectives of the CFP, a number of conservation measures are to be adopted as appropriate in any combination thereof, such as multi-annual plans, technical measures, fixing and allocation of fishing opportunities in full accordance with the best available scientific advice.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) The objective of this plan should be to contribute to the achievement ofachieve the objectives of the CFP, and especially reachstoring and maintaining MSY for the stocks concernedall populations of fish stocks to which this Regulation applies above levels capable of producing MSY, contributing to the implementation of the landing obligation for demersal stocks subject to catch limits and contributing to the implementation of the ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) It is appropriate to establish the target fishing mortality (F) that corresponds to the objective of reaching and maintaining MSY as ranges of values which are consistent with achieving maximum sustainable yield (FMSY). Those ranges, based on scientific advice, are necessary in order to provide flexibility to take account of developments in the scientific advice, to contribute to the implementation of the landing obligation and to take into account the characteristics of mixed fisheries. The FMSY ranges have been calculated by the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) and are derived to deliver no more than a 5% reduction in long-term yield compared to MSY40 . The upper limit of the range is capped, so that the probability of the stock falling below Blim or Abundancelimit is no more than 5%. That upper limit also conforms to the ICES “advice rule”41 , which indicates that when the spawning biomass or abundance is in a poor state, F be reduced to a value that does not exceed an upper limit equal to the FMSY point value multiplied by the spawning biomass or abundance in the TAC year divided by MSY Btrigger or Abundancelimit. ICES uses these considerations and advice rule in its provision of scientific advice on fishing mortality and catch options. _________________ 40EU request to ICES to provide FMSY ranges for selected North Sea and Baltic Sea stocks 41General context of ICES advice, July 2015maximum sustainable yield exploitation rate should be the upper limit for exploitation.
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) Where the targets relating to MSY are not available, the precautionary approach should applymeasures should be based on the precautionary approach to fisheries management as defined in point 8 of Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 in order to guarantee a degree of conservation at least comparable to exploitation rates with the maximum sustainable yield.
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10
(10) “MSY Btrigger” means the spawning stock biomass reference point below which additional specific and appropriate management action is to be taken to ensure that exploitation rates in combination with natural variations rebuild stocks above levels capable of producing MSY in the long term.
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new)
(10a) “Best available scientific advice” means the most up-to-date data available that meet all the requirements set out in Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, in particular Article 25 thereof.
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The plan shall contribute to the achievement ofachieve the objectives of the common fisheries policy listed in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, in particular by applying the precautionary approach to fisheries management, and shall aim to ensure that exploitation of living marine biological resources restores and maintains populations of harvested species above levels which can produce the maximum sustainable yield. The maximum sustainable yield exploitation rate shall be achieved by 2015 where possible and, on a progressive, incremental basis at the latest by 2020 for all stocks, and shall be maintained thereafter.
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. The target fishing mortality shall be achieved as soon as possible, and on a progressive, incremental basis by 2020 for the stocks of Groups 1 and 2all harvested stocks, and shall be maintained thereafter within the ranges set out in Annex I.
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. In accordance with Article 16(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, fishing opportunities shall comply with the target fishing mortality ranges set out in Annex I, column A to this Regulation.
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. Notwithstanding paragraphs 1 and 2, fishing opportunities may be fixed at levels corresponding to lower levels of fishing mortality than those set out in Annex I, column A.
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
Article 4 – paragraph 4
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Fishing opportunities for the stocks of Groups 3 and 4 shall be consistent with best available scientific advice related to maximum sustainable yield.
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. In the absence of scientific advice on fishing mortality rate consistent with maximum sustainable yield, fishing opportunities and measures shall be consistent with best available scientific advice to ensure the sustainability of the stocks in line with the precautionary approach.
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Stocks of Group 5 shall be managed based on the precautionary approach and in line with best available scientific advice in order to guarantee a degree of conservation at least comparable to exploitation rates with the maximum sustainable yield.
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
When scientific advice indicates that remediadditional action is required for the conservation of any of the demersal stocks of Groups 3 to 7, or when the spawning biomass of any of the stocks in Group 1 or abundance of any of the functional units in Group 2 for a given year is below the conservation reference points set out in Annex II, column A to this Regulation, the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 18 of this Regulation and Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013to ensure that any of the fisheries to which this Regulation applies is managed in accordance with Article 3 of this Regulation, the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 18 of this Regulation and Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013. Notwithstanding Article 18(1) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, the Commission may adopt delegated acts in the absence of a joint recommendation referred to in those paragraphs. These delegated acts shall include measures regarding:
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. When allocating quotas, Member States shall take into account objective and transparent criteria pursuant to Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, including the impact of fishing on the environment, the history of compliance, the contribution to the local economy and historic catch levels.
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) exemptions from the application of the landing obligation for species for which the best available scientific evidenadvice demonstrates high survival rates, taking into account the characteristics of the gear, of the fishing practices and of the ecosystem, to facilitate the implementation of the landing obligation; and
Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) specific provisions on documentation of catches, in particular for the purpose of monitoring the implementation ofand controlling in order to ensure a level playing field by ensuring full compliance with the landing obligation ; and
Amendment 315 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I
Annex I
Amendment 319 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I a (new)
Annex I a (new)
Annex Ia Target fishing mortality (as referred to in Article 4) 1. Group 1 Target fishing mortality range consistent with achieving maximum sustainable yield (FMSY) North Sea cod FMSY lower – FMSY Haddock FMSY lower – FMSY North Sea plaice FMSY lower – FMSY Saithe FMSY lower – FMSY North Sea sole FMSY lower – FMSY Kattegat sole FMSY lower – FMSY North Sea whiting Not defined 2. Group 2 Norway lobster functional unit (FU) Target fishing mortality range consistent with achieving maximum sustainable yield (FMSY) (as harvest rate) Division IIIa FU 3 and 4 FMSY lower - FMSY Farn Deeps FU 6 FMSYl ower - FMSY Fladen Ground FU 7 FMSY lower - FMSY Firth of Forth FU 8 FMSY lower - FMSY Moray Firth FU 9 FMSY lower - FMSY