Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | PECH | RODUST Ulrike ( S&D) | GIESEKE Jens ( PPE), VAN DALEN Peter ( ECR), TORVALDS Nils ( ALDE), ENGSTRÖM Linnéa ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | DEVE | ||
Committee Opinion | REGI | ||
Committee Opinion | BUDG | ||
Committee Opinion | ENVI |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 59-p4, TFEU 043-p2
Legal Basis:
RoP 59-p4, TFEU 043-p2Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to establish a multi-annual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) 2018/973 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a multiannual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks, specifying details of the implementation of the landing obligation in the North Sea and repealing Council Regulations (EC) No 676/2007 and (EC) No 1342/2008.
CONTENT: the Regulation establishes a new multi-annual management plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea . These demersal stocks include roundfish, flatfish and cartilaginous fish species, Norway lobsters ( Nephrops norvegicus ) and northern prawns ( Pandalus borealis ) that live and feed near the seabed. The Regulation shall also apply to by-catches caught in the North Sea when fishing for the stocks listed in the plan.
The objective of the plan is:
to contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), and in particular to achieve and maintain the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) for the stocks concerned, by implementing the landing obligation for demersal stocks subject to catch limits, to promote a fair standard of living for those who depend on fishing activities, taking into account coastal fishing and socio-economic aspects, and to implement the ecosystem approach to fisheries management.
The plan shall include objectives, quantifiable targeted objectives with clear timeframes, conservation reference points, safeguard measures and technical measures to avoid and reduce unwanted catches.
The Regulation sets out the target fishing mortality (‘F’) that corresponds to the objective of reaching and maintaining MSY as ranges of values which are consistent with achieving MSY (FMSY). Those ranges, based on the best available scientific advice , are necessary in order to provide the flexibility to take account of developments in scientific advice, to contribute to the implementation of the landing obligation and to take into account the characteristics of mixed fisheries.
When scientific advice indicates that recreational fisheries have a significant impact on the fishing mortality of a particular stock, the Council shall take them into account and may limit recreational fisheries when fixing fishing opportunities in order to avoid exceeding the total target of fishing mortality.
In addition, the new rules strengthen regional cooperation by giving Member States, and thus local fishing communities, a voice on important issues through joint recommendations.
The Commission may adopt delegated acts adapting the geographical distribution of the stocks provided for in the plan if scientific advice from the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) indicates a change in the geographical distribution of the stocks concerned. On the basis of scientific advice, the Commission may also submit a proposal to amend the list of stocks.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 5.8.2018.
The European Parliament adopted by 520 votes to 131, with 9 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing a multi-annual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks and repealing Council Regulation (EC) 676/2007 and Council Regulation (EC) 1342/20081;
The matter was referred back to the committee responsible for inter-institutional negotiations at the sitting of 14.9.2017.
The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows:
Purpose and scope : the Regulation shall establish a multiannual plan for the following demersal stocks in Union waters of the North Sea ( ICES divisions 2a , 3a and subarea 4), including the fisheries exploiting those stocks, and, where those stocks extend beyond the North Sea, in its adjacent waters.
These demersal stocks shall include roundfish, flatfish and cartilaginous fish species, Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) and Northern prawn (Pandalus borealis) that live at or near the bottom of the water column.
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts adjusting the geographical distribution of stocks set out in the plan if the scientific advice provided by ICES indicates a change in the geographical distribution of the relevant stocks.
On the basis of scientific advice, the Commission may submit a proposal for the amendment of the list of stocks .
This Regulation also applies to by-catches caught in the North Sea when fishing for the stocks listed in the plan.
Objective of the plan : the amended text specified the objectives of the plan, namely:
contribute to achieving the objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), and in particular to achieving and maintaining the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) for the stocks concerned, by implementing the landing obligation for the species which are subject to catch limits; promote a fair standard of living for those who depend on fishing activities, taking into account coastal fishing and socio-economic aspects; implement the ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management.
The plan also specifies details for the implementation of the landing obligation in Union waters of the North Sea for all stocks of species to which the landing obligation applies.
The measures taken under the plan should be based on the best available scientific advice.
Fishing opportunities : the new rules shall determine the ranges (minimum-maximum) within which total allowable catches (TACs) and annual quotas would be set. Fishing opportunities shall in any event be fixed in such a way as to ensure that there is less than a 5 % probability of the spawning stock biomass falling below B lim.
When allocating fishing opportunities available to them, Member States shall take account of the likely catch composition of vessels participating in mixed fisheries.
When scientific advice indicates that recreational fisheries have a significant impact on the fishing mortality of a particular stock, the Council shall take them into account and may limit recreational fisheries when fixing fishing opportunities in order to avoid exceeding the total target of fishing mortality.
Safeguard measures : the amended text provides for the possibility to avoid and/or reduce fishing for a particular stock if scientific advice indicates that a stock is threatened. Remedial measures shall be selected taking into account the nature, seriousness, duration and repetition of the situation where the spawning stock biomass.
Technical measures : the Commission may adopt delegated acts to supplement the Regulation as regards:
specifications of characteristics of fishing gears and rules governing their use in order to ensure or improve selectivity, reduce unwanted catches or minimise negative impacts on the ecosystem; limitations or prohibitions on the use of certain fishing gears and fishing activities in certain areas or during certain periods; the fixing of minimum conservation reference sizes for any stock to which the Regulation applies in order to ensure the protection of juveniles of marine organisms.
Cooperation with third countries : where stocks of common interest are also exploited by third countries, the Union should engage with those third countries with a view to ensuring that those stocks are managed in a sustainable manner. Where no formal agreement is reached, the Union should make every effort to reach common arrangements for fishing of such stocks with a view to making sustainable management possible, thereby promoting a level-playing field for Union operators.
The European Parliament adopted by 532 votes to 44, with 20 abstentions, amendments to the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing a multi-annual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks and repealing Council Regulation (EC) 676/2007 and Council Regulation (EC) 1342/2008.
The matter was referred back to the committee responsible for interinstitutional negotiations.
Purpose and scope : the Regulation establishes a multiannual plan for the demersal stocks in waters of Union waters of ICES zones IIa, IIIa and IV (North Sea) and the fisheries, including recreational fisheries, exploiting those stocks.
‘Demersal stocks’ shall cover those roundfish, flatfish and cartilaginous fish species, Norway lobster (Nephrops Norvegicus) and Northern prawn (Pandalus borealis) that live at or near the bottom of the water column
The Commission may submit a proposal to amend the list covered by the definitions on the basis of scientific advice or a request from the Member States concerned.
Restore and maintain fish stocks : Parliament recalled that the aim of this plan should be to help achieve the objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), in particular to restore and maintain fish stocks at biomass levels above those to achieve maximum sustainable yield (MSY). The plan shall contribute to:
the implementation of the landing obligation for demersal stocks subject to catch limits; the implementation and achievement of the socio-economic aspects of the CFP and contributing to the implementation of the ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management by minimising the negative effects of fishing on the marine ecosystem; the achievement of good environmental status and favourable conservation particularly for threatened habitats and protected species including marine mammals and seabirds.
All actions taken under the plan should be based on the best available scientific advice meaning scientific advice which has been reviewed by ICES or STECF and is supported by the most up-to-date data available.
Prohibited species : group 6 in the Commission proposal refers to the list of prohibited species as they currently appear in Article 12 of Council Regulation (EU) 2017/127. Members suggested referring to a less flexible list by specifying the definition of prohibited species.
Targeted objectives : Parliament proposed:
fishing opportunities be fixed in such a way as to ensure that there is less than a 5 % probability of the spawning stock biomass falling below the limit spawning stock biomass reference point (Blim); that the Commission may urgently submit a proposal to revise the fishing mortality ranges set out in Annex I if it considers, on the basis of the best scientific advice available, that these ranges are no longer in line with the objectives of the plan.
Measures of the multiannual plan based on the precautionary approach must guarantee a degree of conservation of the relevant stocks that is at least comparable to exploitation rates in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield.
Fishing opportunities : when allocating the fishing opportunities available to them, Member States should take account of transparent and objective criteria. In the case of joint management of stocks shared with third countries, Member States should allow the exchange of fishing opportunities. Stocks managed jointly with third countries are to be managed wherever possible with joint agreements.
Impact of recreational fishing : a new provision shall provide for the review of available data on recreational fishery catches to determine their potential impact on the stocks of regulated species.
For those stocks for which recreational catches are considered to be significant, the Council shall, when setting fishing opportunities, take account of recreational catches.
Technical measures : Members suggested that a specific chapter should be created to allow technical measures to be put in place in general to achieve the targets for the maximum possible avoidance of and reduction of unwanted catches
The Commission may adopt delegated acts in respect of:
specifications of characteristics of fishing gears and rules governing their use, to ensure or improve selectivity, to reduce unwanted catches or to minimise the negative impact on the ecosystem; limitations or prohibitions on the use of certain fishing gears and on fishing activities, in certain areas or periods to protect spawning fish, fish below the minimum conservation reference size or non-target fish species, or to minimise the negative impact on the ecosystem; the fixing of minimum conservation reference sizes for any of the stocks to which this Regulation applies, to ensure the protection of juveniles of marine organisms.
The Commission shall be empowered to establish biologically sensitive protected areas.
The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report by Ulrike RODUST (S&D, DE) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing a multi-annual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks and repealing Council Regulation (EC) 676/2007 and Council Regulation (EC) 1342/2008.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows.
Purpose and scope : the Regulation establishes a multiannual plan for the demersal stocks in waters of Union waters of ICES zones IIa, IIIa and IV (North Sea) and the fisheries, including recreational fisheries , exploiting those stocks.
‘Demersal stocks’ shall cover those roundfish, flatfish and cartilaginous fish species, Norway lobster ( Nephrops Norvegicus ) and Northern prawn ( Pandalus borealis ) that live at or near the bottom of the water column.
Members recalled that the aim of this plan should be to help achieve the objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), in particular to restore and maintain fish stocks at biomass levels above those to achieve maximum sustainable yield (MSY). The plan shall contribute to:
the implementation of the landing obligation for demersal stocks subject to catch limits; the implementation and achievement of the socio-economic aspects of the CFP and contributing to the implementation of the ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management by minimising the negative effects of fishing on the marine ecosystem; the achievement of good environmental status and favourable conservation status for habitats and species.
All actions taken under the plan should be based on the best available scientific advice .
Prohibited species : group 6 in the Commission proposal refers to the list of prohibited species as they currently appear in Article 12 of Council Regulation (EU) 2017/127. Members suggested referring to a less flexible list by specifying the definition of prohibited species.
Targeted objectives : in line with the provisions of the Baltic Sea Management Plan, Members proposed:
fishing opportunities be fixed in such a way as to ensure that there is less than a 5 % probability of the spawning stock biomass falling below the limit spawning stock biomass reference point (Blim); that the Commission may urgently submit a proposal to revise the fishing mortality ranges set out in Annex I if it considers, on the basis of the best scientific advice available, that these ranges are no longer in line with the objectives of the plan.
Measures of the multiannual plan based on the precautionary approach must guarantee a degree of conservation of the relevant stocks that is at least comparable to exploitation rates in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield.
Fishing opportunities : when allocating the fishing opportunities available to them, Member States should take account of transparent and objective criteria. In the case of joint management of stocks shared with third countries, Member States should allow the exchange of fishing opportunities.
Impact of recreational fishing : a new provision shall provide for the review of available data on recreational fishery catches to determine their potential impact on the stocks of regulated species.
Technical measures : Members suggested that a specific chapter should be created to allow technical measures to be put in place in general. The Commission may adopt delegated acts in respect of:
specifications of characteristics of fishing gears and rules governing their use, to ensure or improve selectivity, to reduce unwanted catches or to minimise the negative impact on the ecosystem; limitations or prohibitions on the use of certain fishing gears and on fishing activities, in certain areas or periods to protect spawning fish, fish below the minimum conservation reference size or non-target fish species, or to minimise the negative impact on the ecosystem; the fixing of minimum conservation reference sizes for any of the stocks to which this Regulation applies, to ensure the protection of juveniles of marine organisms.
The Commission shall be empowered to establish biologically sensitive protected areas.
PURPOSE: to establish a multi-annual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides following the ordinary legislative procedure on an equal footing with Council.
BACKGROUND: in the framework of the common fisheries policy established by Regulation (EU) 1380/2013, multi-annual plans should contribute to achieving fishing at sustainable levels (Maximum Sustainable Yield). The fisheries of the North Sea and adjacent areas are highly complex , involving vessels from at least seven coastal Member States , as well as Norway, using a wide variety of different fishing gears to target a wide range of different fish and shellfish species. A key issue is that many of the most important demersal stocks (i.e. those that live on or near the bottom of the sea) are caught in mixed fisheries. The proposal presented by the Commission establishes a plan taking into account such mixed fisheries interactions.
The Basic Regulation aims at solving the problems of overfishing and discarding fish. However, without additional legislation, the Basic Regulation could lead to under-utilisation of quota in the North Sea mixed fisheries and would not allow any exemptions from the landing obligation to be adopted after the three year discard plans have expired. Hence, if no appropriate measures are taken, the Basic Regulation might have negative economic and social consequences for the fishing industry in the coming years.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the preferred choice ( a single mixed fishery multi-annual plan for North Sea demersal fisheries ), wherein FMSY (maximum rate of fishing mortality) is achieved by 2020 at the latest and stocks are rebuilt to within precautionary levels quickly is judged to be more effective than Option 1 (to manage using the Basic Regulation) to achieve the objectives of the initiative.
CONTENT: the proposal aims to establish a multi-annual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks in order to contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the CFP set out in Regulation 1380/2013. The plan will:
ensure the sustainable exploitation of these stocks, by ensuring that they are exploited according to the principles of maximum sustainable yield and of the ecosystem approach to fisheries management; provide stability of fishing opportunities, while ensuring that management is based on the most up to date scientific information on stocks, mixed fisheries and other aspects of the ecosystem and environment; facilitate the introduction of the landing obligation.
The proposal aims to replace the current plan for cod , as well as the plan for plaice and sole by bringing all multi-annual plans for the different demersal stocks into one regulation.
The plan will apply to all Union fishing vessels irrespective to their overall length in fishing in the North Sea as this is in conformity with the rules of the CFP and is in line with the effect of the vessels on the fish stocks concerned. The proposed plan:
requires the EU to set catch limits that restore and maintain fish stocks above levels that can produce the Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY); defines ranges within which catch limits can be set. Fishing opportunities in the higher part of the ranges will only be possible under clearly defined conditions and in line with the MSY approach; establishes safeguard measures for biomass based on the precautionary approach laid out in the Basic Regulation; obliges the EU to take swift action when the sustainability of any demersal North Sea fish stock is threatened; establishes the necessary framework for implementing regionalisation within the North Sea and provides for regional cooperation among Member States regarding the adoption of measures on the landing obligation and specific conservation measures for certain stocks; adopt thresholds above which catches of demersal stocks should only be landed in designated ports ; does not include annual limits on fishing effort (the numbers of days at sea).
There will be periodic evaluation (every five years) of the impact of the plan on the stock concerned based on scientific advice.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2018/973
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 179 16.07.2018, p. 0001
- Draft final act: 00014/2018/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)414
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T8-0212/2018
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: PE619.097
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: GEDA/A/(2018)001886
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2018)001886
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE619.097
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T8-0357/2017
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A8-0263/2017
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE603.029
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE600.947
- Committee draft report: PE594.033
- Debate in Council: 3497
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2016)0267
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2016)0272
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2016)0493
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2016)0267
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2016)0272
- Committee draft report: PE594.033
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE603.029
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE600.947
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2018)001886
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE619.097
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)414
- Draft final act: 00014/2018/LEX
Activities
- David COBURN
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Multiannual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Multiannual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Multi-annual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Multi-annual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (debate)
- Ian HUDGHTON
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Multiannual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Multiannual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Multi-annual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Multi-annual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (debate)
- Ulrike RODUST
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Multiannual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (debate) DE
- 2016/11/22 Multi-annual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (A8-0263/2017 - Ulrike Rodust) (vote) DE
- 2016/11/22 Multi-annual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (debate) DE
- 2016/11/22 Multi-annual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (debate) DE
- Ioan Mircea PAŞCU
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Multiannual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (debate) RO
- 2016/11/22 Multiannual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Multiannual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (debate) RO
- Sylvie GODDYN
- Sander LOONES
- Notis MARIAS
- Ricardo SERRÃO SANTOS
- Mireille D'ORNANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Czesław HOC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Werner KUHN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Patrick O'FLYNN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Isabelle THOMAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0263/2017 - Ulrike Rodust - Am 52/2 14/09/2017 12:19:44.000 #
A8-0263/2017 - Ulrike Rodust - Am 83S=99S 14/09/2017 12:21:24.000 #
A8-0263/2017 - Ulrike Rodust - Am 66/2 14/09/2017 12:22:30.000 #
A8-0263/2017 - Ulrike Rodust - Am 97 14/09/2017 12:22:51.000 #
A8-0263/2017 - Ulrike Rodust - Am 85 14/09/2017 12:23:23.000 #
A8-0263/2017 - Ulrike Rodust - Proposition de la Commission 14/09/2017 12:24:19.000 #
A8-0263/2017 - Ulrike Rodust - Demande de mettre au votes les amendements 29/05/2018 12:40:40.000 #
SE | IE | EL | ?? | SI | CY | AT | FI | DK | EE | LU | LT | NL | MT | LV | HR | FR | PT | CZ | BE | HU | SK | ES | BG | IT | PL | GB | RO | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
18
|
8
|
16
|
1
|
5
|
5
|
16
|
11
|
7
|
6
|
4
|
9
|
23
|
5
|
8
|
11
|
67
|
20
|
16
|
19
|
16
|
12
|
44
|
15
|
60
|
45
|
60
|
29
|
87
|
|
GUE/NGL |
47
|
4
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (6) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
France GUE/NGL |
4
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (7) |
|||||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
48
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
France Verts/ALEFor (6) |
2
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
United Kingdom Verts/ALEFor (4)Against (2) |
Germany Verts/ALEFor (13) |
|||||||||||||
EFDD |
31
|
2
|
France EFDD |
11
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDFor (10)Against (1)Abstain (1) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
30
|
3
|
3
|
France ENFFor (10)Against (2)Abstain (2) |
1
|
Italy ENFAbstain (6) |
2
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
18
|
Greece NIAgainst (2) |
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
61
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
Poland ECRFor (11)Against (5) |
United Kingdom ECRFor (1)Against (15) |
2
|
4
|
|||||||||||||
ALDE |
62
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (7) |
1
|
2
|
France ALDEAgainst (7) |
1
|
3
|
Belgium ALDEAgainst (6) |
Spain ALDEFor (1)Against (6) |
4
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
|||||||||
S&D |
156
|
Sweden S&DFor (4)Against (1) |
1
|
2
|
2
|
Austria S&DFor (1)Against (3) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
France S&DFor (2)Against (9) |
Portugal S&DFor (1)Against (7) |
4
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
8
|
3
|
Italy S&DFor (3)Against (25)
Alessia Maria MOSCA,
Brando BENIFEI,
Caterina CHINNICI,
Cécile Kashetu KYENGE,
Damiano ZOFFOLI,
Daniele VIOTTI,
Elena GENTILE,
Elly SCHLEIN,
Enrico GASBARRA,
Flavio ZANONATO,
Giuseppe FERRANDINO,
Isabella DE MONTE,
Luigi MORGANO,
Mercedes BRESSO,
Michela GIUFFRIDA,
Nicola CAPUTO,
Nicola DANTI,
Paolo DE CASTRO,
Patrizia TOIA,
Pier Antonio PANZERI,
Renata BRIANO,
Renato SORU,
Roberto GUALTIERI,
Silvia COSTA,
Simona BONAFÈ
|
Poland S&DAbstain (1) |
United Kingdom S&DAgainst (18) |
Romania S&DFor (1)Against (11) |
Germany S&DFor (1)Against (21)
Arndt KOHN,
Bernd LANGE,
Birgit SIPPEL,
Constanze KREHL,
Evelyne GEBHARDT,
Gabriele PREUSS,
Ismail ERTUG,
Jakob von WEIZSÄCKER,
Jens GEIER,
Jo LEINEN,
Joachim SCHUSTER,
Martina WERNER,
Michael DETJEN,
Norbert NEUSER,
Peter SIMON,
Petra KAMMEREVERT,
Susanne MELIOR,
Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN,
Tiemo WÖLKEN,
Udo BULLMANN,
Ulrike RODUST
Abstain (2) |
|||
PPE |
190
|
Sweden PPEAgainst (4) |
3
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
5
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
Netherlands PPE |
3
|
4
|
5
|
France PPEAgainst (17)Abstain (1) |
Portugal PPEAgainst (7) |
Czechia PPEAgainst (4)Abstain (1) |
4
|
Hungary PPEAgainst (10) |
Slovakia PPEAgainst (6) |
Spain PPEAgainst (15)
Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA,
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE,
Carlos ITURGAIZ,
Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA,
Francisco José MILLÁN MON,
Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET,
Gabriel MATO,
José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA,
Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL,
Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA,
Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO,
Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT,
Santiago FISAS AYXELÀ,
Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO,
Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ
Abstain (1) |
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (6) |
Italy PPEAgainst (9) |
Poland PPEAgainst (18)
Adam SZEJNFELD,
Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA,
Andrzej GRZYB,
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI,
Bogdan Brunon WENTA,
Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA,
Danuta Maria HÜBNER,
Dariusz ROSATI,
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA,
Jan OLBRYCHT,
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI,
Jarosław KALINOWSKI,
Jarosław WAŁĘSA,
Jerzy BUZEK,
Julia PITERA,
Krzysztof HETMAN,
Marek PLURA,
Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
Abstain (1) |
2
|
12
|
Germany PPEAgainst (31)
Albert DESS,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Burkhard BALZ,
Christian EHLER,
Daniel CASPARY,
David MCALLISTER,
Dennis RADTKE,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Elmar BROK,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Hermann WINKLER,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Karl-Heinz FLORENZ,
Manfred WEBER,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Reimer BÖGE,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Sven SCHULZE,
Thomas MANN,
Werner KUHN,
Werner LANGEN
Abstain (1) |
A8-0263/2017 - Ulrike Rodust - Am 103 29/05/2018 12:41:11.000 #
Amendments | Dossier |
256 |
2016/0238(COD)
2017/04/19
PECH
256 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 a (new) (25a) As recreational fisheries can have a significant impact on fish resources, the multiannual plan should provide a framework for ensuring that they are conducted in a manner compatible with the objectives of the plan. Member States should collect catch data of recreational fisheries. Where such fisheries have a significant impact on resources, the plan should foresee the possibility to decide on specific management measures.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) In accordance with Article 10(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 provisions should be established for the periodical assessment by the Commission of the adequacy and effectiveness of the application of this Regulation. Such assessment should follow and be based on periodic evaluation of the plan based on scientific advice: the plan should be evaluated by three years after the entry into force of this Regulation, and every five years thereafter. This period allows for the full implementation of the landing obligation, and for regionalised measures to be adopted, implemented and to show effects on the stocks and fishery. It is also the minimum required period by scientific bodies.
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) In order to adapt to the technical and scientific progress in a timely and proportionate fashion and to ensure flexibility and allow evolution of certain measures, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of supplementing this Regulation as regards remedial measures
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation establishes a multi- annual plan (“plan”) for the following demersal stocks in waters of Union waters of ICES zones IIa, IIIa and IV (“North Sea”)
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation establishes a multi- annual plan (“plan”) for the demersal stocks in waters of Union waters of ICES zones IIa, IIIa and IV (“North Sea”) and the fisheries exploiting those stocks; the UK’s exit of the Union will impact the plan.
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses disappointment that Norway has not been fully consulted in establishing this multi- annual plan; recognises that as of 29 March 2019, arrangements for managing shared North Sea stocks will be agreed between the Union, Norway and the UK in a trilateral agreement; calls on the Commission therefore to halt the process of this proposal until the future North Sea arrangement is clear.
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Recommends that parliamentary work on this plan is stopped until the future management of the North Sea is clear; as of 30 March 2019 management of shared stocks in the North Sea will be shared in a trilateral agreement between Norway, the UK and the Union with Norway and the UK responsible for 80% of the North Sea basin.
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The plan takes account of the European Union’s bilateral relations with Norway, just as future bilateral agreements with Norway will have to take account of the plan;
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Articles 2, 8 and 9 also apply to recreational fisheries.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Articles 4, 5
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Articles 4, 5, 6 and 8 apply to the stock areas for Groups 1
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Where on the basis of scientific advice, or on the basis of a request from the concerned Member States, the Commission considers that the list mentioned in Article 2 needs to be adjusted, the Commission may submit a proposal for the revision of this list.
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. This Regulation also applies to by- catches caught when fishing for the stocks identified in paragraph 2.
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. This Regulation also applies to by- catches caught when fishing for the stocks referred to in paragraph 1.
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Articles 2, 3, 8, 9 and 13 also apply to recreational fisheries.
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. This Regulation also specifies details for the implementation of the landing obligation for all species provided for in Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013,other than the stocks already identified in paragraph 1 of this Article.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Where on the basis of scientific advice, or on the basis of a request from the Member States concerned, the Commission considers that the list incorporated in paragraph 2 needs to be amended, the Commission may submit a proposal for the revision of this list.
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. This Regulation also applies to by- catches caught when fishing for the stocks identified in Article 2.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Where, on the basis of scientific advice or on the basis of a request from the concerned Member States, the Commission considers that the list referred to in paragraph 1 needs to be amended, the Commission may submit a proposal for the revision of that list.
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 (1) “demersal stocks” means those roundfish and flatfish species
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) (1a) “recreational fisheries” means non-commercial fishing activities exploiting marine living aquatic resources for recreation, tourism or sport;
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part (2) “Group 1”: means demersal stocks for which targets as FMSY ranges and safeguards linked to biomass are established in this plan as follows
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part (2) “Group 1”: means demersal stocks for which targets as FMSY ranges and safeguards linked to biomass are established in this plan, as
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part (2) “Target species Group 1”: means demersal stocks for which targets as FMSY ranges and safeguards linked to biomass are established in this plan as follows:
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – introductory part (3) “Group 2” means Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) by functional units (FU)
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – introductory part Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – introductory part (3) “Group 2” means Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) functional units (FU) for which targets as FMSY ranges and safeguards linked to abundance are established in this plan
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – introductory part (3) “Target species Group 2” means Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) functional units (FU) for which targets as FMSY ranges and safeguards linked to abundance are established in this plan consisting of:
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new) (3a) “By-catch species group” means: - demersal stocks subject to catch limits other than those listed in Group 1 in the North Sea; - Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) functional units and statistical rectangles outside the functional units in ICES zone IIa and Subarea IV subject to catch limits other than those listed in Group 2; - demersal stocks not subject to catch limits in the North Sea; - prohibited species in respect of which fishing is prohibited and which are identified as such in a Union legal act adopted in the area of the common fisheries policy in the North Sea; - demersal stocks for which targets as FMSY ranges and safeguards linked to biomass are established in Union legislation other than this Regulation.
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 a (new) (8 a) The stocks concerned shall only be amended on the basis of the best available scientific advice.
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9 (9) “total allowable catch” (TAC) means
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10 (10) “MSY Btrigger” means the spawning stock biomass reference point below which additional specific and appropriate management action is to be taken to ensure that exploitation rates in combination with natural variations rebuild stocks above levels capable of producing MSY in the long term.
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new) (10a) ‘FMSY range’ means a range of values in which, according to scientific advice, in a mixed fishery, all levels of fishing mortality rate within the scientifically indicated limit values of that range will produce the maximum sustainable yields (MSYs) in the long term under the existing average environmental conditions without any significant adverse effects on the reproduction of the stocks concerned;
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new) (10a) “Best available scientific advice” means the most up-to-date data available that meet all the requirements set out in Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, in particular Article 25 thereof.
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new) (10a) “recreational fisheries” means non-commercial fishing activities exploiting marine living biological resources for recreation, tourism or sport.
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new) (10a) ‘recreational fisheries’ means non-commercial fishing activities exploiting marine living biological resources for recreation, tourism or sport.
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The plan shall
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The plan shall contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the common fisheries policy listed in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, in particular by applying the precautionary approach to fisheries management as well as contribute to a fair standard of living for those who depend on fishing activities, bearing in mind socio-economic aspects, and shall aim to ensure that exploitation of living marine biological resources restores and maintains populations of harvested species above levels which can produce the maximum sustainable yield.
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The plan shall contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the common fisheries policy listed in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, in particular by applying
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. The plan shall contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the common fisheries policy listed in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, in particular by applying the precautionary approach to fisheries management, and shall aim to ensure that exploitation of living marine biological resources restores and maintains populations of harvested species above levels which can produce the maximum sustainable yield by 2020 at the latest.
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The plan shall help to attain the socioeconomic objectives referred to in Article 2(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, particularly maintenance of the standard of living of those who are dependent on fishing activities, preserving an efficient and transparent internal market for fisheries and aquaculture products and maintaining equal conditions for fisheries and aquaculture products marketed in the Union;
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The plan shall contribute to the elimination of discards, by avoiding and reducing, as far as possible, unwanted catches
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The plan shall contribute to the
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The plan shall contribute to the gradual elimination of discards, by avoiding and reducing, as far as possible, unwanted catches, and to the implementation of the landing obligation established in Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 for the species which are subject to catch limits and to which this Regulation applies.
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The plan shall enable fishermen to acquire more economic visibility in the long term.
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. The plan shall implement the ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management in order to ensure that
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. The plan shall implement the ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management in order to ensure that negative impacts of fishing activities on the marine ecosystem are minimised.
Amendment 172 #
4.
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point a (a)
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point b (b) contribute, where justified, to the fulfilment of other relevant descriptors contained in Annex I to Directive 2008/56/EC in proportion to the role played by fisheries in their fulfilment.
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point b (b)
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point b (b)
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new) (ba) ensure that all measures taken under the plan are in accordance with the best available scientific advice;
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point b b (new) (bb) ensure that all measures taken under the plan are in accordance with best available and most up-to-date scientific advice.
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Measures under this plan shall be taken on best available scientific advice.
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Measures under the plan shall be taken in accordance with the best available scientific advice.
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. The measures under the plan shall be taken on the basis of the best available scientific advice.
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. The measures set out in the plan shall be undertaken taking into account the best available scientific advice.
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – title Targets for
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. The target fishing mortality shall be achieved as soon as possible, and on a progressive, incremental basis by 2020 for
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. The target fishing mortality shall be achieved as soon as possible, and on a progressive, incremental basis by 2020 for
Amendment 186 #
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. In accordance with Article 16(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, fishing opportunities shall comply with the target fishing mortality ranges set out in Annex I, column A to this Regulation, taking into account the objectives of the common fisheries policy listed in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, in particular by bearing in mind coastal fisheries and socio-economic aspects.
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. In accordance with Article 16(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, fishing opportunities shall
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. In accordance with Article 16(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, fishing opportunities shall comply with the target fishing mortality ranges set out in Annex I
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 3. Notwithstanding paragraphs 1 and 2, fishing opportunities may be fixed at levels corresponding to lower levels of fishing mortality than those set out in Annex I
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point a (a) if, on the basis of the most up-to- date scientific advice or evidence, it is necessary for the achievement of the objectives laid down in Article 3 in the case of mixed fisheries;
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point a a (new) (aa) Decisions to fish in the upper range shall be supported by the best available scientific advice, in accordance with point (c) of Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013. Detailed scientific evidence shall be made publicly available at least four weeks before the adoption of decisions on fishing opportunities under Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 based on column B of Annex I.
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point b (b) if, on the basis of the most up-to- date scientific advice or evidence, it is necessary to avoid serious harm to a stock caused by intra- or inter-
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point c a (new) (ca) in order to take account of mortality caused by other activities, given that mortality in fish is also influenced by other factors such as pollution deriving from activities carried out on land and on the sea bed, and it should therefore be ensured that the burden of stock recovery measures does not fall exclusively on fishermen and fisherwomen.
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Where, according to the best available scientific advice, the MSY exploitation rate is achieved for the stock concerned by 2020, fishing opportunities for that stock may be fixed in accordance with paragraph 4 thereafter.
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Where, on the basis of scientific advice, the Commission considers that the fishing mortality ranges set out in Annex I no longer correctly express the objectives of the plan, the Commission may as a matter of urgency submit a proposal for revision of those ranges.
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Where scientific recommendations indicate that the level of fishing capable of producing MSY will be reached no later than 2020 for the stock in question, fishing opportunities may be determined for that stock in accordance with paragraph 4.
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Where, on the basis of scientific recommendations or at the request of the regional body (the Scheveningen Group) or the regional advisory council (the NSAC), the Commission considers that the fishing mortality ranges set out in Annex I no longer correctly express the objectives of the plan, the Commission may as a matter of urgency submit a proposal for their revision.
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Where, on the basis of the best available scientific advice, the Commission considers that the fishing mortality ranges set out in Annex I no longer correctly express the objectives of the plan, the Commission may as a matter of urgency submit a proposal for revision of those ranges.
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Fishing opportunities shall in any event be fixed in such a way as to ensure that there is less than a 5% probability of the spawning stock biomass falling below the limit spawning stock biomass reference point (Blim) set out in particular in Annex II, column B.
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. Fishing opportunities for the stocks of Groups 3 and 4 shall be consistent with the most up-to-date scientific advice related to maximum sustainable yield.
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. Fishing opportunities for the stocks of Groups 3 and 4 shall be consistent with best available scientific advice related to maximum sustainable yield.
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 2. In the absence of scientific advice on fishing mortality rate consistent with maximum sustainable yield, fishing opportunities for the stocks managed under this plan shall be consistent with scientific advice to ensure the sustainability of the stocks in line with the precautionary approach to fisheries management as defined in point 8 of Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 and an ecosystem- based approach. Additional fisheries management measures shall ensure a level of conservation comparable to exploitation rates consistent with maximum sustainable yield.
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 2. In the absence of scientific advice on fishing mortality rate consistent with maximum sustainable yield, fishing opportunities for by-catch species subject to a TAC shall be consistent with the best available scientific advice to ensure the sustainability of the stocks in line with the precautionary approach.
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 2. In the absence of scientific advice on fishing mortality rate consistent with maximum sustainable yield, fishing opportunities and measures shall be consistent with best available scientific advice to ensure the sustainability of the stocks in line with the precautionary approach.
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Where appropriate, in a mixed fishery, in line with Article 9(5) of Regulation (EU) 1380/2013, such management measures may take into account the difficulty of fishing all stocks at maximum sustainable yield at the same time. In such cases the precautionary approach may be applied including through the use of the measures outlined in Article 9.
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Where appropriate, in a mixed fishery, in line with Article 9(5) of Regulation 1380/2013, such management measures may take into account the fact that it is not possible to fish all stocks at maximum sustainable yield at the same time. In such cases the precautionary approach may be applied including through the use of the measures outlined in Article 9.
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Where appropriate, in a mixed fishery, in line with Article 9(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, such management measures may take into account the difficulty of fishing all stocks at maximum sustainable yield at the same time. In such cases the precautionary approach may be applied including through the use of the measures set out in Article 9.
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Fishable by-catch stocks that are not subject to a TAC shall be managed based on the precautionary principle, in line with the best available scientific advice.
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 Stocks of Group 5 shall be managed based on the precautionary approach in line with scientific advice. The absence of adequate scientific information shall not justify postponing or failing to take management measures to conserve target species, associated or dependent species and non- targeted species and their environment.
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 Stocks of Group 5 shall be managed based on the precautionary approach
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 Stocks of Group 5 shall be managed based on the precautionary approach and in line with best available scientific advice in order to guarantee a degree of conservation at least comparable to exploitation rates with the maximum sustainable yield.
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – title Safeguards for
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. When scientific advice indicates that for a given year the spawning biomass of any of the
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. When the most up-to- date scientific advice indicates that for a given year the spawning biomass of any of the stocks in Group 1 is below the MSY Btrigger or that the abundance of any of the functional units in Group 2 is below the Abundancebuffer set out in Annex II, column A, all appropriate remedial measures shall be adopted to ensure rapid return of the stock or functional unit concerned to levels above those capable of producing maximum sustainable yield. In particular, by way of derogation from Article 4(2) fishing opportunities shall be set at levels consistent with a fishing mortality, taking into account the decrease in biomass or abundance, that is reduced below the range laid down in Annex I, column A.
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. When scientific advice indicates that
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. When scientific advice indicates that for a given year the spawning biomass of any of the stocks in Group 1 is below the MSY Btrigger or that the abundance of any of the functional units in Group 2 is below the Abundancebuffer set out in Annex II, column A, all appropriate remedial measures shall be adopted to ensure rapid return of the stock or functional unit concerned to levels above those capable of producing maximum sustainable yield. In particular, by way of derogation from Article 4(2) fishing opportunities shall be set at levels consistent with a fishing mortality, taking into account the decrease in biomass or
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. When scientific advice indicates that for a given year the spawning biomass of any of the stocks in Group 1 is below the MSY Btrigger or that the abundance of any of the functional units in Group 2 is below the Abundancebuffer set out in Annex II, column A, all appropriate remedial measures shall be adopted to ensure rapid return of the stock or functional unit concerned to levels above those capable of producing maximum sustainable yield. In particular, by way of derogation from Article 4(2) fishing opportunities shall be set at levels consistent with a fishing mortality, taking into account the decrease in biomass or abundance, that is reduced below the range laid down in Annex I, column
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. When scientific advice indicates that the spawning stock biomass of any of the stocks concerned is below the Blim or the abundance of any of the Norway lobster functional units is below Abundancelimit as set out in Annex II, column B to this Regulation, further remedial measures shall be taken to ensure rapid return of the stock or functional unit concerned to levels above the level capable of producing maximum sustainable yield. In particular, those remedial measures
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. When the most up-to- date scientific advice indicates that the spawning stock biomass of any of the stocks concerned is below the Blim or the abundance of any of the Norway lobster functional units is below Abundancelimit as set out in Annex II, column B to this Regulation, further remedial measures shall be taken to ensure rapid return of the stock or functional unit concerned to levels above the level capable of producing maximum sustainable yield. In particular, those remedial measures shall include, by way of derogation from
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. When scientific advice indicates that the spawning stock biomass of any of the stocks concerned is below the Blim or the abundance of any of the Norway lobster functional units is below Abundancelimit as set out in Annex II, column B to this Regulation, further remedial measures shall be taken to ensure rapid return of the stock or functional unit concerned to levels above the level capable of producing maximum sustainable yield. In particular, those remedial measures
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. When scientific advice indicates
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Remedial measures referred to in this Article may include: (a) emergency measures in accordance with Articles 12 and 13 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013; (b) measures pursuant to Articles 11 and 11a (new) of this Regulation. The choice of measures referred to in this Article shall be made in accordance with the nature, seriousness, duration and repetition of the situation where the spawning stock biomass is below the levels referred to in paragraph 1.
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. If, on the basis either of scientific advice or the proposals of the regional forum (‘Scheveningen group’) or the North Sea Advisory Council (NSAC), the Commission considers that the conservation reference points set out in Annex II no longer correctly express the objectives of the plan, the Commission may as a matter of urgency submit a proposal for revision of those conservation reference points.
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Where, on the basis of scientific recommendations or at the request of the regional body (the Scheveningen Group) or the regional advisory council (the NSAC), the Commission considers that the conservation reference points set out in Annex II no longer correctly express the objectives of the plan, the Commission may as a matter of urgency submit a proposal for their revision.
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. The ultimate choice of measures referred to in this Article shall be made in accordance with the nature, seriousness, duration and repetition of the situation where the spawning stock biomass is below the levels referred to in Annex II.
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. The choice of measures referred to in this Article shall be made in accordance with the nature, seriousness, duration and repetition of the situation where the spawning stock biomass is below the levels referred to in Annex II.
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – title Specific conservation measures for
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – title Specific conservation measures
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – title Specific conservation measures
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – title Specific conservation measures
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part When scientific advice indicates that remedial action is required for the conservation of any of the demersal stocks
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part When scientific advice indicates that remedial action is required for the conservation of any of the demersal stocks
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part When scientific advice indicates that remedial action is required for the conservation of any of the demersal stocks
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part When scientific advice indicates that remedial action is required for the conservation of any of the demersal stocks of Groups 3 to 7, or when the spawning biomass of any of the stocks in Group 1 or abundance of any of the functional units in Group 2 for a given year is below the conservation reference points set out in Annex II, column A to this Regulation, the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 18 of this Regulation and Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013. Such delegated acts may supplement this Regulation by laying down rules regarding:
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part When scientific advice indicates that
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part When the most up-to-date scientific advice indicates that remedial action is required for the conservation of any of the demersal stocks of Groups 3 to 7, or when the spawning biomass of any of the stocks in Group 1 or abundance of any of the functional units in Group 2 for a given year is below the conservation reference points set out in Annex II, column A to this Regulation, the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 18 of this Regulation and Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 regarding:
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – title Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. In accordance with Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, when allocating the fishing opportunities available to them, Member States shall use transparent and objective criteria, including those of an environmental, social and economic nature, and shall also endeavour to distribute national quotas fairly among the various fleet segments giving special consideration to traditional and artisanal fisheries, and to provide incentives to Union fishing vessels deploying selective fishing gear or using fishing techniques with reduced environmental impact.
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. When allocating quotas, Member States shall take into account objective and transparent criteria pursuant to Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, including the impact of fishing on the environment, the history of compliance, the contribution to the local economy and historic catch levels.
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 2. Without prejudice to Article 8, the TAC for the stock of Norway lobster in ICES zones in Union waters of IIa and IV
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 2. Without prejudice to Article 8, the TAC for the stock of Norway lobster in ICES zones IIa and IV
Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 2. Without prejudice to Article 8, the TAC for the stock of Norway lobster in ICES zones IIa and IV
Amendment 270 #
Article 10 a Recreational fisheries When setting fishing opportunities, account shall be taken of recreational fisheries. This shall be done by: (a) deducting the estimate, derived from the best available data, of recent catches by recreational fisheries from the scientific advice on fishing opportunities corresponding to the target fishing mortality; (b) imposing restrictions on recreational fisheries such as daily bag limits, closed seasons, etc.; or (c) a combination of (a) and (b).
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – title Provisions linked to the landing obligation for
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – title Provisions linked to the landing obligation
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – title Provisions linked to the landing obligation
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – introductory part For demersal stocks of
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) exemptions from the application of the landing obligation for species for which the best available scientific
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) specific provisions on documentation of catches, in particular for the purpose of monitoring
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 a (new) Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notwithstanding Article 18(1) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, the Commission may adopt delegated acts also in the absence of a joint recommendation referred to in those paragraphs.
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 a (new) Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 The control measures provided for in this Chapter shall apply in addition to those provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 The control measures provided for in this Chapter shall apply in addition to those provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 for target and by-catch demersal stocks
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 The control measures provided for in this Chapter shall apply in addition to those provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 for demersal stocks
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 a (new) Margin of tolerance in the logbook By way of derogation from Article 14(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009, for catches which are landed unsorted the permitted margin of tolerance in estimates recorded in the fishing logbook of the quantities in kilograms of fish retained on board shall be 10 % of the total quantity retained on board.
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 2 Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 2 Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 2 Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. In addition to the prior notification obligation laid down in Article 17(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009, masters of Union fishing vessels of overall length of
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point c Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point d Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – title Logbook requirements for
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 Amendment 302 #
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 Amendment 305 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – title Designated ports
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)
Amendment 307 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point c Amendment 308 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 No less than
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 No less than five years after the entry into force of this Regulation, and every five years thereafter, the Commission shall ensure an evaluation of the impact of the
Amendment 311 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 No less than five years after the entry into force of this Regulation, and every five years thereafter, the Commission shall ensure an evaluation of the impact of the plan on the stocks to which this Regulation applies and on the fisheries exploiting those stocks. It shall submit the results of this evaluation to the European Parliament and to the Council. The Commission may submit the report earlier, provided that it or all the Member States concerned believe this to be necessary.
Amendment 312 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 No less than
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 a (new) The Commission shall report annually to the European Parliament on progress in achieving the objectives of this Regulation, in particular to restore and maintain all stocks covered by this Regulation above levels capable of producing the Maximum sustainable Yield.
Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 a (new) Amendment 316 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – group 1 – row 4 Saithe 0.2
Amendment 318 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – group 1 – row 6 Kattegat 0.19 – 0.2
Amendment 319 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I a (new) Annex Ia Target fishing mortality (as referred to in Article 4) 1. Group 1 Target fishing mortality range consistent with achieving maximum sustainable yield (FMSY) North Sea cod FMSY lower – FMSY Haddock FMSY lower – FMSY North Sea plaice FMSY lower – FMSY Saithe FMSY lower – FMSY North Sea sole FMSY lower – FMSY Kattegat sole FMSY lower – FMSY North Sea whiting Not defined 2. Group 2 Norway lobster functional unit (FU) Target fishing mortality range consistent with achieving maximum sustainable yield (FMSY) (as harvest rate) Division IIIa FU 3 and 4 FMSY lower - FMSY Farn Deeps FU 6 FMSYl ower - FMSY Fladen Ground FU 7 FMSY lower - FMSY Firth of Forth FU 8 FMSY lower - FMSY Moray Firth FU 9 FMSY lower - FMSY
Amendment 320 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – group 1 – subtitle Stock Minimu Limit m biomass m biomass spawning reference spawning reference stock point (in stock point (in biomass tonnes) biomass tonnes) reference (Blim) reference (Blim) point (in point (in tonnes) tonnes) (MSY (MSY Btrigger) Btrigger) Column Column B A
Amendment 321 #
Saithe
Amendment 66 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 3 a (new) - having regard to official notification, by the UK Government, of Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union on 29 March 2017 to exit the European Union,
Amendment 67 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 3 b (new) - having regard to the United Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea, particularly Article 56 which establishes rights, jurisdiction and duties of coastal states in their exclusive economic zone and Article 63 which establishes management measures for stocks occurring in the exclusive economic zone of two or more coastal states,
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Title 1 Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on establishing a multi-annual plan for certain demersal stocks in the North Sea and adjoining waters, and the fisheries exploiting those stocks, adopting provisions concerning the implementation of the landing obligation in the North Sea and in all other waters of the Union and outside it which do not fall under the sovereignty or jurisdiction of third countries, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) 676/2007 and Council Regulation (EC) 1342/2008
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Title 1 Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on establishing a multi-annual plan for certain demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks and repealing Council Regulation (EC) 676/2007 and Council Regulation (EC) 1342/2008
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The objectives of the CFP are, amongst others, to ensure that fishing and aquaculture are environmentally sustainable in the long-term, to apply the precautionary approach to fisheries management to ensure that stocks of harvested species are restored and maintained at levels above those that can produce MSY, and to implement the ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The objectives of the CFP are, amongst others, to ensure that fishing and aquaculture are environmentally sustainable in the long-term, to apply the precautionary approach to fisheries management,
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 a (new) (4 a) In accordance with Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, the maximum sustainable yield exploitation rate is to be achieved by 2015 where possible and, on a progressive, incremental basis at the latest by 2020 for all stocks.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) For the achievement of the objectives of the CFP, a number of conservation measures are to be adopted as appropriate in any combination thereof, such as multi-annual plans, technical measures, fixing and allocation of fishing opportunities in full accordance with the best available scientific advice.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Pursuant to Articles 9 and 10 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, multi- annual plans are to be based on scientific, technical and economic advice and contain objectives, quantifiable targets with clear
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) Since recreational fisheries can have a significant effect on fish resources, allowance must be made in this plan for expected recreational catches when setting total allowable catches for the commercial fishery.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In addition, such a multi-annual plan should apply to all demersal
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9a) Some stocks of common interest are also exploited by third countries, which makes it very important that the Union should consult those third countries in order to ensure that the stocks are managed sustainably. In the absence of a formal agreement, the Union must do everything in its power to agree common arrangements for the fishing of these stocks in order to facilitate sustainable management, in which connection equal terms for the Union’s market operators must be secured, enforced and promoted.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The objective of this plan should be to contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the CFP, and especially reaching and maintaining MSY for the stocks concerned, contributing to
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The objective of this plan should be to contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the CFP, and especially
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The objective of this plan should be to contribute to the achievement of the
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The objective of this plan should be to contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the CFP, and especially reaching and maintaining MSY for the stocks concerned, contributing to the
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The objective of this plan should be to contribute to the achievement of the
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The objective of this plan should be to
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The objective of this plan should be
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10a) This plan should also contribute to the achievement of good environmental status as laid down in Directive 2008/56/EC and to the achievement of favourable conservation status for habitats and species as required by Directive 2009/147/EC and Council Directive 92/43/EC respectively.
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10a) In uncertain times, this plan should help to render the added value of European fisheries policy and the CFP perceptible and visible for fishermen, entrepreneurs and residents of coastal settlements.
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) Article 16(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 requires that fishing opportunities be fixed in accordance with the
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 a (new) (11a) In accordance with Article 33(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, stocks managed jointly with third countries must be managed wherever possible with joint agreements in line with the goals laid down in Articles 1, 2, 4 and 5 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) It is appropriate to establish the target fishing mortality (F) that corresponds to the objective of reaching and maintaining MSY as ranges of values which are consistent with achieving maximum sustainable yield (FMSY). Those ranges, based on scientific advice, are necessary in order to provide flexibility to take account of developments in the scientific advice, to contribute to the implementation of the landing obligation and to take into account the characteristics of mixed fisheries.
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) It is appropriate to establish the target fishing mortality (F) that
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) It is appropriate to establish the target fishing mortality (F) that corresponds to the objective of reaching and maintaining MSY as ranges of values which are consistent with achieving maximum sustainable yield (FMSY). Those ranges, based on scientific advice, are necessary in order to provide flexibility to take account of developments in the scientific advice, to contribute to the implementation of the landing obligation and to take into account the characteristics of mixed fisheries. The
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) It is appropriate to establish the target fishing mortality (F) that corresponds to the objective of reaching and maintaining MSY as ranges of values which are consistent with achieving maximum sustainable yield (FMSY). Those ranges, based on scientific advice, are necessary in order to provide flexibility to take account of developments in the scientific advice, to contribute to the implementation of the landing obligation and to take into account the characteristics of mixed fisheries. The
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) It is appropriate to establish the target fishing mortality (F) that corresponds to the objective of reaching and maintaining MSY as ranges of values which are consistent with achieving maximum sustainable yield (FMSY). Those ranges, based on scientific advice, are necessary in order to provide flexibility
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) Where the targets relating to MSY are not available, the
Amendment 98 #
(16) For Norway lobster functional units for which they are available, it is appropriate to use
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 a (new) source: 603.029
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9/date |
Old
2018-03-21T00:00:00New
2018-03-20T00:00:00 |
links/Research document/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2018)628257New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2018)628257 |
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE594.033New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-PR-594033_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE603.029New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AM-603029_EN.html |
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE600.947New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AM-600947_EN.html |
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=30115&j=0&l=en
|
docs/7 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/1 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170913&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2016-09-13-TOC_EN.html |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180528&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2018-05-28-TOC_EN.html |
events/10 |
|
events/11 |
|
events/12 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/6/body |
EC
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0263&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0263_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0357New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0357_EN.html |
events/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0212New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0212_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links/Research document/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2018)621885New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2018)628257 |
other |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
PECH/8/07563New
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/10 |
|
activities/11 |
|
activities/12 |
|
activities/13 |
|
activities/14 |
|
activities/15 |
|
activities/16 |
|
links/Research document |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 059-p4New
Rules of Procedure EP 59-p4 |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/9/docs/0/text |
|
activities/6/docs/0/text |
|
activities/8 |
|
activities/9 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 059-p4
|
activities/7/docs |
|
activities/8 |
|
activities/7/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/7 |
|
activities/8 |
|
activities/6/docs |
|
activities/6 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/4/body |
Old
EPNew
unknown |
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Rejection by committee to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee |
activities/5 |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2017-10-23T00:00:00New
2017-09-13T00:00:00 |
activities/4/date |
Old
2017-06-21T00:00:00New
2017-07-12T00:00:00 |
activities/3 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/4 |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
Old
Economic and Social CommitteeNew
European Economic and Social Committee |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52016PC0493:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52016PC0493:EN
|
activities/0/commission/0/DG/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/maritimeaffairs_fisheries/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/maritime-affairs-and-fisheries_en |
other/0/dg/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/maritimeaffairs_fisheries/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/maritime-affairs-and-fisheries_en |
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/1 |
|
committees/3/shadows/1 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/1 |
|
committees/3/shadows/1 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/2 |
|
committees/3/shadows/2 |
|
activities/2 |
|
procedure/geographical_area |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/1 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/2 |
|
committees/3/shadows/1 |
|
committees/3/shadows/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/1 |
|
committees/3/shadows/1 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/date |
2016-09-15T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/3/date |
2016-09-15T00:00:00
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows |
|
committees/3/shadows |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
PECH/8/07563
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|