Activities of Petr JEŽEK related to 2018/2194(DEC)
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL) for the financial year 2017
Amendments (4)
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that the revislocation of the mandate of the Agency and its move to BudapestAgency to Budapest in 2014 and the revision of its mandate in 2016 triggered modifications to the Agency’s accounting procedures; regrets that since 2013 the accounting system of the Agencythe Agency's accounting procedures hasve not been re- validated as it should normally have been the case; requests the Agency to take the necessary measures without delaysince 2013; takes note of the Agency's response that the re-validation is currently subject to discussions and planning within DG BUDG;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Regrets that the Agency onlyTakes note of the Court's comments with regards to publishesing vacancy notices on its own website, in social media and in the inter- agency network and not on the website of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO); acknowledgethe EPSO site; acknowledges the concerns of the Agency with regards theo additional translation costs incurred but points out that there are only a limited number of vacancies concerned in the specific case of the Agency; agrees with the Court of Auditdue to the fact that EPSO requires publication of vacancy notices in all official languages; requests thereforse that this would be relevant and useful as EPSO publications increase transparency and publicity and allow citizens to identify vacancies published by the different European institutions and agencies collectively; insists therefore that the Agency also publishes itse Agency publish all vacancy notices on the inter-agency job board developed by the EU Agencies network, and where relevant to also post vacancy notices on the EPSO website;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that at the end of 2017 the Agency had not carried a comprehensive analysis of the likely Brexit impacts on its organisation, operations and accounts; welcomes the remedial actions taken by the Agency and notes its limited exposure, also due to the move from Hampshire to Budapestthat the Agency assesses that its risks are limited;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7