4 Amendments of Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ related to 2014/2221(INI)
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for the mid-term review of the MFF to identify betteranalyse and take due account of the value added by EU funding to the goals of competitiveness, growth, employment and energy transition set by the European Union;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls once more on the Council to agree with Parliament and the Commission on a common method for assessing realcalculating the level of payments needs in accordance withcessary to cover the real needs commitments made by the two arms of the budgetary authority;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Regrets once again that Member States persist in viewing their contribution to the EU budget as an adjustment variable in their consolidation efforts, which in turn leads to an artificial reduction in the volume of payments available in the EU budget; proposes therefore that when examining national budgets, the Comm special provission shall enter in the calculations of deficitss have to be made to show each country’s share of unpaid invoices in order to draw attention to the true state of affairs concerning liabilities attributable to each Member State;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Member States to top up this fund and welcomes the Commissionʼ's intention to exclude national contributions from stability pact calculationsproposal to show flexibility with regard to the national contributions to the EFSI in case those lead to a small and temporary breach of the 3% deficit threshold for a Member State; rejects the idea of any attempts to renationalise the fund or argue for a fair return which could ensue from national contributions; wishes to see trans- European and supranational projects chosen so that citizens may be able to associate the benefits arising from these projects with action by the European Union.