[ParlTrack]

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21

(21) To further the knowledge in this area and support Member States, the Agency should define and finance relevant projects, such as the development of reference standards on new drugs, the elaboration of toxicological or pharmacological studies, implementing innovative approaches to research, and drug profiling. Such an approach would support the sharing of information between relevant laboratories and would decrease the costs for individual laboratories.

2022/09/27
Committee: LIBE

Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22

(22) Since the Agency has access to data and the necessary scientific experience to develop and promote evidence-based interventions, best practices, harm reduction policies, and awareness rising and prevention strategies, it should be involved in prevention work, in particular exchange of best practices and implementable research results in drug prevention, drug- related crime prevention and the prevention of drug-related harms, including the elaboration of quality standards for drug prevention (European Drug Prevention Quality Standards) or of a curriculum providing decision- and policy- makers with the knowledge about the most effective evidence-based prevention interventions and approaches (European Union Prevention Curriculum)

2022/09/27
Committee: LIBE

Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30

(30) Fees improve the funding of an agency and may be considered for specific issues that can be clearly separated from the core tasks of the agency. Any fees levied by the Agency should cover its costs for providing the respective services.deleted

2022/09/27
Committee: LIBE

Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 5 – point e

(e) providing information on quality standards, innovative best practices, innovative and implementable research results in the Member States and facilitating the exchange and implementation of such standard and practices.

2022/09/27
Committee: LIBE

Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new)

(h a) as far as possible, and acting within its mandate, provide data, analysis, and best practices to, and share the latest evidence-based policy recommendations with, the European Commission and the Member States, in as so far such date, analysis, best practices and policy recommendations concern European and national policies which address the phenomenon of addictions.

2022/09/27
Committee: LIBE

Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 5 – point g

~~(g) proposing to the Commission, after consulting the Management Board, the amount of fees in accordance with Article 37;~~deleted

2022/09/27
Committee: LIBE

Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 3 – point c

~~(c) the fees paid for services rendered in accordance with Article 37; an~~deleted

2022/09/27
Committee: LIBE

Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37

1. The Agency may charge fees for the following: (a) training programmes; (b) certain support activities for Member States that have not been identified as a priority but could be beneficially conducted if supported by national resources; (c) capacity-building programmes for third countries, which are not covered by separate dedicated Union funding; (d) certification of national bodies set up in third countries pursuant to Article 20(3); (e) other services falling within its mandate and rendered at the request of a participating country which require the investment of resources in the support of national activities. 2. At the proposal of the Executive Director, the Management Board of the Agency shall set the amount of the fees and the way in which they are paid. 3. Fees shall be proportionate to the costs of the relevant services as provided in a cost-effective way and shall be sufficient to cover those costs. Fees shall be set at such a level as to ensure that they are non-discriminatory and that they avoid placing an undue financial or administrative burden on stakeholders. 4. Fees should be set at a level such as to avoid a deficit or a significant accumulation of surplus in the budget. Should a significant positive balance in the budget, resulting from the provision of the services covered by fees, become recurrent, a revision of the level of the fees, or of the Union contribution, shall become mandatory. In case a significant negative balance results from the provision of the services covered by fees, a revision of the level of the fees shall become mandatory.Article 37 deleted Fees

2022/09/27
Committee: LIBE

8 Amendments of Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ related to 2022/0009(COD)

ParlTrack - 2011-2024