6 Amendments of Siegfried MUREŞAN related to 2016/2247(INI)
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes the high level of non- performing loans (NPLs) in some jurisdictions; considers that this issue is crucial and has yet to be solved urgently; welcomes the work of the SSM and its draft guidance on this issue as a first step and awaits further efforts in this regard; looks forward to the results of the work on a minimum EU insolvency framework; calls on Member States to improve their insolvency legislation and to stimulate growth in order to tackle NPLs;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that there are substantial risks associated with sovereign debt; notes, however, that modifying its prudential treatment could have a significant effect on the financial sector, which calls for caution in reform efforts; awaits with interest the results of the international work on this issue; considers that, in the end, a better regulatory framework, be it European or international, will be neededcalls on the Member States and the European Commission to tackle the issue swiftly;
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that national options and discretions arecan hindering the creation of a level playing field between Member States in some cases; welcomes the ECB guidance and regulation harmonising the exercise of some of these within the Banking Union; looks forward to the upcoming amendments to the CRR as a means of closing the most significant ones;
Amendment 285 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls the need to adhere to State aid rules in the context of bank resolution; takes the view that enough flexibility is embedded within the current framework to address specific situations and might be better exploited, in particular in the case of preventive measures involving the use of DGS funds; calls on the European Commission to ensure the feasibility of the application of the preventive measures provided for in the DGSD;
Amendment 344 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Regrets that the Commission did not allow for more time to assess the implementation of the DGSD before proposing the EDIS and did not conduct a proper impact assessment of the proposal; stands ready, however, to seize the opportunity generated by the proposal to discuss the DGSD and address some of the options and discretions it includes;
Amendment 377 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Is aware of the potential risks and benefits of an EDIS; is nevertheless of the opinion that risk reduction measures are an indispensable counterparty to its establishment in order to prevent moral hazard, and that such measures should preferably precede risk sharing;