70 Amendments of Maria NOICHL related to 2023/2015(INI)
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 a (new)
Citation 9 a (new)
– having regard to the Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the making available on the Union market as well as export from the Union of certain commodities and products associated with deforestation and forest degradation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 995/2010,
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 14 a (new)
Citation 14 a (new)
– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee, 'Towards a sustainable plant protein and plant oil strategy for the EU', NAT/856,
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russian invasion of Ukraine have had dramatic effects on global trade and have made it more apparent that the EU needs to diversify its food and feed supply chains and become as independent as possible from foreign countries in supplying European consumers and as regards feed;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas plant-based proteinsincreased cultivation and consumption of plant-based proteins in the EU as well as meat production adapted to the level of domestic feed production are crucial for the transition towards more sustainable food systems with a reduced climate impact;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas the global demand for soy has drastic consequences for the environment and the climate, as arable land is being expanded worldwide, converting vast areas of forest and savannah;1a _________________ 1a See also: Hannah Ritchie and Max Roser (2021) - "Forests and Deforestation"
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas food is responsible for about 25-30% of global greenhouse gas emissions, with over 80% of these emissions derived from the livestock sector;1awhereas average European per capita consumption of animal protein is 50% higher today than in the early 1960s and twice the global average; _________________ 1a See also: Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D. et al. Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nat Food 2, 198–209 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021- 00225-9
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D c (new)
Recital D c (new)
Dc. whereas EU animal husbandry is heavily dependent on imports of crops with a high protein content; whereas, in this context, only the livestock sector makes a high claim to arable land outside the EU and also in the EU; whereas only about one third of the EU’s arable land is used directly by humans for a plant-based diet;1a _________________ 1a See also: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/ etudes/BRIE/2019/640143/EPRS_BRI(20 19)640143_EN.pdf
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D d (new)
Recital D d (new)
Dd. whereas the current high level of meat production in the EU, especially of pork and poultry meat, would not be possible without protein imports; whereas an overwhelming proportion of harvests in the EU is used for animal feed and the second most important use of harvests is to produce technical energy; whereas the direct use of plants as food represents only a small part of crop production;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D e (new)
Recital D e (new)
De. whereas a shift to more plant- based foods would not only improve food security, but would also bring major benefits to climate change mitigation and, at the same time, significant additional benefits for human health;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas leguminous crops and grasslands help maintain and improve soil quality and fertility, increase biodiversity as well as carbon and nitrogen fixation and lead to improved water retention;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas domestic production of leguminous crops makes a positive contribution to climate change mitigation, as in addition to the positive environmental impacts, production would also lead to the elimination of deforestation risks and transport;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Recital E b (new)
Eb. whereas grain legumes in particular reduce weed pressure;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas aquaculture has a crucial role in global food security and nutritionsustainable aquaculture can contribute to protein production; whereas, however, intensive aquaculture is often accompanied by diverse environmental damage, such as the consequences of using chemicals or antibiotics; whereas the use of algae as feed can partially reduce the negative environmental impacts of fish-based feed for aquaculture;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas cell-based agriculture and seafood farming are promising and innovative solutionmeat production by the industry and seafood farming may be alternative methods for obtaining proteins, but are subject to criticism regarding a number of issues;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas interest in insects for human and animal consumption is growing; whereas the production of insects requires a considerable amount of energy;
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Underlines that not least the Ukraine war with its disruptions on the international (commodity) markets has shown that it is also very important for the EU to have strategic supply autonomy in the agricultural sector; Calls in this context for the EU to ensure its food security and reduce dependence on agricultural products and resources from third countries;
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Underlines that conventional agriculture in particular must make a greater contribution to protein crop production, since organic farms have already almost maximised their share of leguminous crops in the crop rotation;
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – point 1 a (new)
Paragraph 2 – point 1 a (new)
1a. A vision of the livestock sector that is oriented towards regional, agricultural and ecological potential and limits;
Amendment 267 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 2 a (new)
Subheading 2 a (new)
A vision of the livestock sector that is oriented towards regional, agricultural and ecological potential and limits;
Amendment 269 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Underlines that, from a geopolitical and strategic perspective, dependencies on a single or few suppliers must be reduced as far as possible and replaced by sustainable animal husbandry with less need for imported feed; Underlines that, consequently, demand should be replaced as far as possible by domestic production, provided this is possible with the available land;
Amendment 276 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Underlines that pork exports from the EU increased by over 65%, poultry exports from the EU increased by over 40% and beef exports from the EU increased by over 40% between 2010 and 2020;
Amendment 280 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Amendment 282 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 c (new)
Paragraph 3 c (new)
Amendment 284 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 d (new)
Paragraph 3 d (new)
3d. Emphasises that more than half of our water footprint comes from imported goods, with imports accounting for as much as 60% of cultivated products, meaning that the EU imports large quantities of water in a virtual form from producer countries; Underlines in this context that importing goods conserves own water resources, but this is to the detriment of producing countries; Emphasises that the production of one kilo of soybeans requires about 1800 litres of water and that the current high level of intensive soybean production is unsustainable in the context of water scarcity;
Amendment 285 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 e (new)
Paragraph 3 e (new)
3e. Emphasises that the health and environmental costs of water pollution in the EU due to excess nitrogen and phosphorus are more than €22 billion per year;2a _________________ 2a See also: European Commission (2021) Green taxation and other economic instruments: Internalising environmental costs to make the polluter pay
Amendment 286 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 f (new)
Paragraph 3 f (new)
3f. Emphasises that the import of protein feed from third countries, especially from North and South America, has left a large ecological footprint and, particularly in South America, is one of the main causes of land-use change and has often led to environmental problems such as contamination of groundwater by pesticides, soil erosion, water shortages and deforestation, resulting in a devastating decline in biodiversity; Underlines that soya production has negative social and health consequences in producer countries, aggravated by weak land tenure rights, land grabbing, forced expulsion and other human rights abuses;
Amendment 287 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 g (new)
Paragraph 3 g (new)
3g. Emphasises that the livestock sector in the EU, due to its many negative side effects, must be aligned in the future with regional, agricultural and ecological potential and limits;
Amendment 288 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 h (new)
Paragraph 3 h (new)
3h. Welcomes the fact that per capita meat consumption in the EU is expected to fall from 69.8 kg in 2018 to 67 kg in 2031; Regrets that meat exports have been rising steadily for years;1a _________________ 1a See also: European Commission, EU agricultural outlook 2021-2031, https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/news/eu- agricultural-outlook-2021-31-consumer- behaviour-influence-meat-and-dairy- markets-2021-12-09_en
Amendment 304 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Emphasises that there is a protein shortage in the EU’s compound feed sector in particular, and not in the supply of plant protein for the food sector;
Amendment 305 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Emphasises that the same environmental and social standards must be met when importing protein feed as when producing it in the EU; Underlines the consumers’ need for non-GMO soy cultivation;
Amendment 306 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 c (new)
Paragraph 4 c (new)
Amendment 307 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 d (new)
Paragraph 4 d (new)
4d. Is concerned about the decline of agricultural land in the EU, which, according to calculations by the European Commission, will lead to a decrease of almost 1 million hectares of farm land in the EU by 2030;
Amendment 308 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 e (new)
Paragraph 4 e (new)
4e. Emphasises the importance of cereals and grassland, especially grass and clover pastures, as a feed source for livestock;
Amendment 309 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 f (new)
Paragraph 4 f (new)
4f. Emphasises that it will not be possible to fully substitute the many protein imports with European production without this having negative impacts on other areas of agricultural production;
Amendment 310 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 g (new)
Paragraph 4 g (new)
4g. Emphasises that 37% of the ecological priority areas in the previous CAP were used for the cultivation of nitrogen-fixing crops; Is concerned that a similar area will not be achieved under Member States’ national strategic plans;
Amendment 316 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Highlights that sustainable, domestic protein production must be recognised as a crucial aspect of the EU food system;
Amendment 335 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Considers that developing the production of plant and alternative sources of protein in the EU is an effective way of addressing many of the environmental and climate challenges that the EU faces;
Amendment 340 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Emphasises that the expansion of oleaginous crops in the EU would benefit energy self-sufficiency for fuel supply on the one hand and greater availability of oilcake on the other; Underlines that oleaginous crops are also an ideal addition to crop rotation;
Amendment 342 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Calls for increased support for the processing chain of plant protein in the EU to shorten transport routes and create more opportunities for drying, heating and milling, as the current small and decentralised cultivation areas in the EU result in high costs;
Amendment 347 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Emphasises that protein production starts with farmers, fishers and aquaculture farmers and that they must therefore be central to the strategy;
Amendment 356 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that European businesses must become more competitive , but protein crops must also become more economically viable; Is particularly critical of the import of cheap soya from overseas;
Amendment 376 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Recalls that it will be impossibleis very important to increase the production of plant-based protein without good-quality plant materialson the land as well; Emphasises that land will have to be cleared for this and that this will lead to conflicts; Underlines that if the high number of animals to be fattened in livestock husbandry in the EU is maintained, it will not be possible to produce the amount of protein in Europe that is currently imported by the EU;
Amendment 426 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Highlights the bigat it is important to determine the exact potential of plant- based protein and the fact; Highlights that the development of the sector will benefit European farmers, soil quality, biodiversity, the climate and human health and is strategically important for European food security;
Amendment 450 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Stresses the importance of grasslands as a protein source; Highlights the r, especially for ruminants; Believance ofes that projects that extract high- quality protein as well as biomethanol from grasslands through biorefiningusing grassland by way of biorefining as well as biomethanol only make sense if direct utilisation via livestock does not make sense;
Amendment 463 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Is of the opinion that sustained aquaculture is an important protein producer and that the use of algae as a food or feed additive is a promising way ofoffers the potential to partially reducinge emissions from livestock;
Amendment 465 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Amendment 468 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18b. Emphasises that escaped farmed fish from aquacultures lead to negative effects in mixing with wild populations due to the altered gene pool, which is particularly problematic as wild populations continue to decline;
Amendment 469 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 c (new)
Paragraph 18 c (new)
18c. Emphasises that fish farming in aquacultures still feeds more fish with fish oil and fish meal than it produces, and it massively pollutes the water;
Amendment 482 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Considers that innovativeEmphasises that the production of novel, industrially produced, cell- based food can help increase protein production and support agriculture; s involves a higher consumption of energy and water than that of industrial poultry and pig farming;1a _________________ 1a Tuomisto, H. L., Ellis, M. J., & Haastrup, P. (2014, October). Environmental impacts of cultured meat: alternative production scenarios. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on life cycle assessment in the agri-food sector (pp. 8-10).
Amendment 491 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Emphasises that cell-based foods are produced in bioreactors and that this technique is used solely by industrial companies;
Amendment 492 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19b. Underlines that the culture medium of cell-based meat is often made from calf serum obtained from the foetuses of slaughtered pregnant cows;
Amendment 493 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 c (new)
Paragraph 19 c (new)
19c. Underlines that antibiotics must also be added to cell-based meat to combat bacterial infestation;
Amendment 501 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses that insects should be considered as alternative sources of protein, particularly for animal nutrition; Underlines the high energy requirements of mass rearing of insects;
Amendment 577 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Highlights that protein production in the EU will not increase if there is no market-driven demand for it and if it is not profitable for farmers to grow it;
Amendment 591 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Believes that public procurement should be used in a better way to incentivise more sustainable plant-based protein production as well as more sustainable and reduced animal proteind consumption;
Amendment 596 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Stresses that action at all levels is needed in order to increase protein production; domestic plant- based protein production and to bring intensive livestock farming to a level that is oriented towards regional, ecological and agricultural potential and limits by means of an appropriate funding policy;
Amendment 603 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. Emphasises that the European Commission, in consultation with EU Member States on the National Strategic Plans, should push for the appropriate promotion of protein crops through coupled income support, mobilisation of support for rural development through the promotion of investments, and cooperation in the food chain;
Amendment 604 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 b (new)
Paragraph 30 b (new)
30b. Emphasises that cultivating leguminous crops without using pesticides could be offered as an eco-scheme;
Amendment 605 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 c (new)
Paragraph 30 c (new)
30c. Calls for financial support for de- oiling systems to be made possible through the CAP in the Member States, as these are necessary for regional utilisation as feed;
Amendment 606 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
31. Recalls the need to promote effective agricultural knowledge and innovation systems to further promote more intense dialogue in the fields of supply chain management and sustainable agronomic practices; Calls on the European Commission to create an easily accessible online platform in this context for the exchange of best practice examples and information on the cultivation of plant-based protein;
Amendment 649 #
va. a strategy to gradually reduce livestock farming in the EU in order to reduce pressure on third-party land and to consistently comply with existing thresholds for pollution from emissions, in particular from nitrate in surface waters and groundwater and ammonia;
Amendment 650 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 – point vi
Paragraph 32 – point vi
Amendment 658 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 – point vii a (new)
Paragraph 32 – point vii a (new)
viia. Rules ensuring that protein imports meet production and quality standards comparable to the European standard in terms of their health and environmental impacts;
Amendment 660 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 – point viii
Paragraph 32 – point viii
viii. A combination of common agricultural policy rules that provide a stable framework, flexible management practices, a roadmap of best practices to ensure sustainable soya production, strategies for stronger links between livestock farming and regional feed potential and incentives for the production of protein-rich crops, grassland and legumes;
Amendment 707 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 – point xiii a (new)
Paragraph 32 – point xiii a (new)
xiiia. uniform guidelines that ensure GMO-free production in Europe in the future;
Amendment 711 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 – point xiii b (new)
Paragraph 32 – point xiii b (new)
xiiib. a study on the EU-wide potential and land requirements of protein and oleaginous crops that can be grown within the EU;
Amendment 714 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 – point xiii c (new)
Paragraph 32 – point xiii c (new)
xiiic. a grazing strategy for Europe with the aim of promoting extensive grazing;
Amendment 716 #
xiiid. a European responsibility strategy that ensures the basic nourishment of Europe with its own soil;