Activities of Max ANDERSSON related to 2014/2252(INI)
Plenary speeches (1)
Annual reports 2012-2013 on subsidiarity and proportionality (debate) SV
Shadow reports (1)
REPORT on the Annual reports 2012-2013 on subsidiarity and proportionality PDF (178 KB) DOC (132 KB)
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION on the annual reports 2012-2013 on subsidiarity and proportionality
Amendments (5)
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that the eight-week period given to national parliaments to issue a reasoned opinion under Article 6 of the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality should be extended significantly to allow national parliaments and, where appropriate, regional parliaments, to participate to a greater extent; encourages national and regional parliaments to become more involved in the European debate;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Underlines the huge potential impact of EU level decisions that the conclusion of international trade agreements such as TTIP and CETA may have on the capacity of regional and local self- government including decisions on services of general economic interest; calls on Commission and Council to fully take the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality into account when negotiating international trade agreements and to report about their potential effects on subsidiarity to the European Parliament;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Considers that the "yellow card"- procedure ought to be made easier for parliaments to use; points out that it is worth considering whether the threshold should to be decreased and the time- period in which parliaments can use the procedure should be lengthened;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Notes that legislative proposals may change dramatically in the lead-up to adoption by the institutions; recallsand that a check on compliance with the principle of subsidiarity is onlymight be undertaken at the outset and not at the conclus; recalls nevertheless there should be no obligation ofn the legislative process; further recalls that impact assessments more generally are only prepared for the initial rather than the final stages of the legislative processor to perform an impact assessment on compliance with the principle of subsidiarity of an agreement reached on a legislative act prior to the final adoption of an agreement;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14