7 Amendments of Paul TANG related to 2016/2247(INI)
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to the 2016 IMF Global Financial Stability Report,
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas our work on the capital market union should not move away pressure from the completion of our work on the banking union, which still is a pre- requirement for financial stability in the bank-reliant landscape of the European Union;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Is concerned by the lingering instability of the banking landscape in Europe, inter alia underlined by the 2016 IMF Global Financial Stability Report that states that Europe would even under a cyclical recovery retain a high share of weak and challenged banks; reiterates the call by the IMF for fundamental changes in both bank business models and system structure to ensure a healthy European banking system;
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Considers it essential to ensure the comparability of risk-weighted assets across institutions in order to allow for effective supervision; welcomes the work done internationally to streamline the resort toaddress risks and inefficiencies associated with internal models, as well as the introduction of a leverage ratio to act as a backstop; recalls, however, that the regulatory changes planned should not result in significant increases in capital requirements, norconsiders that the capital position of banks can be strengthened by reducing dividend payments and raising fresh equity; recalls, however, that the regulatory changes planned should at the same time strengthen the overall financial position of European banks and should not harm the ability of banks to finance the real economy, in particular SMEs;
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that the ‘too-big-to-fail’ issue still needs to be addressed quickly;
Amendment 301 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Takes note of the differences between the FSB TLAC standard and the MREL; stresses, however, that both standards share the same objective which is avoiding the socialisation of private risks; concludes therefore that a holistic approach to loss-absorption can be reached by combining the two; highlights that due consideration should be given to retaining the two criteria of size and risk-weighted assets;
Amendment 375 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Is aware of the potential benefits of an EDIS; is nevertheless of the opinion that risk reduction measures are an indispensable counterparty to its establishment in order to prevent moral hazard, and that such measures should preferably precedego hand in hand with risk sharing;