25 Amendments of Gunnar BECK related to 2022/0407(CNS)
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive
Citation 5 a (new)
Citation 5 a (new)
Having regard of Article 113 TFEU,
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) The rise of the digital economy has significantly impacted on the operation of the Union VAT system, as it is unsuitedposes challenges to the new digital business models, and does not allow for the full use of the data generated by digitalisation. Council Directive 2006/112/EC60 should be amended to take account of this evolution. _________________ 60 Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ L 347, 11.12.2006, p. 1).
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) The VAT reporting obligations should be adapted to address the challenges of the platform economy and to reduce the need for multiplopaque VAT registrations in the Union.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) In order to increasoptimize tax collection on cross-border transactions and to end the existing fragmentation stemming from Member States’ implementation of divergent reporting systems, rules should be laid down for Union digital reporting requirements. Such rules should provide information to tax administrations on a transaction-by-transaction basis, in order to allow cross matching of data, increase the control capabilities of tax administrations and create a deterrent effect on non- compliance, while reducing compliance costs for businesses operating in different Member States and eliminating barriers within the internal market.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) To facilitate the automation of the reporting process for both taxable persons and tax administrations, theMember State should facilitate the possibility of transactions to be reported to tax administrations should be documented electronically. The use of electronic invoicing should become the default system for issuing invoices. Nevertheless, Member States should be allowed to authorise other means for domestic suppliesin an electronic format. The issuance of electronic invoices by the supplier and its transmission to the customer should not be conditional on a prior authorisation or verification by the tax administration.
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) The electronic invoice should facilitate the automated transmission to the tax administration of the data needed for control purposes. For this purpose, the electronic invoice should contain all the data that have to be later transmitted to the tax administration.
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) The implementation of the electronic invoice as the default method for documenting transactions for VAT purposes would not be possible if the use of the electronic invoice remains subject to the acceptance by the recipient. Therefore, such an acceptance should no longer be required for the issuance of electronic invoices.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
Recital 13
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
Recital 15
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) Several Member States have put in place divergent reporting requirements for transactions within their territories, leading to significant administrative burdens for taxable persons which operate in different Member States, as they need to adapt their accounting systems to comply with those requirements. In order to avoid the costs derived from such divergenceIn order to lower the compliance costs for digital VAT filing, the systems implemented in Member States to report supplies of goods and services for consideration between taxable persons within their territory should comply with the same features ofbe aligned with the system implemented for intra- Community transactions. Member States should provide for the electronic means for the transmission of the information and, as is the case for intra-Community transactions, it should be possible for the taxable person to submit the data in accordance with the European standard laid down in Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1870, even though the relevant Member State could provide for additional means to transmit the data. The data should be allowed to be sent by the taxable person directly or by a third party on that person’s behalf.
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) The platform economy has raised certain difficultinew challenges for the application of the VAT rules -in particular the establishment of the taxable status of the provider of the service and the level playing field between small and medium- sized enterprises (SMEs) and other businesses.
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) The platform economyCurrent VAT rules hasve led to an unjustified distortion of competition between supplies performed through online platforms that escape VAT taxation, and supplies performed in the traditional economy that are subject to VAT. The distortion has been most acute in the two largest sectors of the platform economy behind e- commerce, namely the short-term accommodation rental sector and the passenger transport sector. Recalls however that the ECJ cases against Uber (C-434/15, C-320/16) and Airbnb (C- 390/18), the difference in tax treatment was not considered to be the element that significantly distorted the competition with resp. the taxi and the hotel sector. Underlines that one should rather look into the overregulation and tax burden on the traditional economy, rather then the legislative loopholes concerning the platform economy.
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 25
Recital 25
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 31
Recital 31
(31) VAT identification is, in general, required in every Member State where taxable transactions take place. However, to reducoptimize the instances in which multiple VAT registrations are required, Directive (EU) 2017/2455 introduced into Directive 2006/112/EC a number of measures to minoptimisze the need for multiple VAT registrations. In order to further reduce the need for multiplean excessive amount of VAT registrations, a number of extension measures have been identified to support the objective of a single VAT registrationreducing red tape in the Union. Rules should therefore be laid down to provide for these extension measures.
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) Amongst other measures, Directive (EU) 2017/2455 extended the scope of the Mini OSS to become a broader OSS, covering all cross-border supplies of services to non-taxable persons taking place in the Union and all intra- Community distance sales of goods. Exceptionally, electronic interfaces, such as marketplaces and platforms, which become deemed suppliers for certain supplies of goods within the Union can also declare certain domestic supplies of goods in the Union OSS scheme. To support the objective of a singlereducing an excessive amount of VAT registrations in the Union, the scope of the Union OSS scheme should be further expanded to cover other supplies of goods, including domestic business-to-consumer supplies of goods in the Union by taxable persons who are not identified for VAT purposes in the Member State of consumption, ensuring that businesses do not need to register for VAT in each Member State where such supplies of goods to consumers take place. In addition, the scope of the Union OSS scheme should be expanded to also include domestic supplies of margin scheme goods to any person, when those goods are supplied by a taxable person (taxable dealer) who is not identified in the Member State were such supplies of goods take place. This amendment would allow taxable dealers to benefit from the OSS simplifications, and allow for the VAT due on those supplies to be declared and paid in one Member State of identification via the enlarged Union OSS scheme.
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 33
Recital 33
(33) VAT is normally charged and accounted for by the supplier of the goods or services. However, in certain circumstances Member States may provide that, under the reverse charge mechanism, the recipient of the supply, rather than the supplier, is obliged to account for the VAT due. To further support the objective of a singlereducing an excessive amount of VAT registrations in the Union, rules should be laid down for the mandatory application by Member States of the reverse charge mechanism in situations where a supplier is not established for VAT purposes in the Member State in which VAT is due. A supplier, making supplies of goods or services to a person who is identified for VAT in the Member State where the supply is taxable, should be entitled to apply the reverse charge. For control purposes, such supplies should be reported in the recapitulative statement.
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 37
Recital 37
(37) The VAT registration of a supplier is required when that supplier is not identified for VAT in the Member State where VAT is due. In particular, the transfer of a taxable person's own goods to another Member State for, inter alia, the purposes of that person’s e-commerce related activity triggers a need to register in the Member States from and to where the goods are transferred. In congruence with the objective of a singlereducing excessive amounts of VAT registrations in the Union, the instances in which multiple VAT registrations are required should be further reduced by providing for the application of a new scheme in the framework of the OSS schemes, which is specifically designed to simplify the VAT compliance obligations associated with certain transfers of own goods.
Amendment 150 #
(39) The margin scheme operates by allowing taxable dealers to pay VAT on the difference between the sale price and the purchase price of goods covered by the scheme namely second-hand goods, works of art, collectors' items and antiques. To ensure that the taxation of those specific supplies occurs in the Member State where the customer is established, has his or her permanent address or usually resides, Directive 2006/112/EC should be amended to introduce a new place of supply rule. In addition, Directive 2006/112/EC should be amended to specifically exclude supplies of margin scheme goods from the mandatory application of the reverse charge mechanism. However, to support the objective of a singlereducing excessive amounts of VAT registrations in the Union, and to minimise compliance burdens, taxable dealers that operate under the margin scheme can opt to register to use the Union OSS scheme to declare and pay the VAT due on certain supplies of margin scheme goods via that scheme, without the need to register in multiple Member States.
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 218 – paragraph 2
Article 218 – paragraph 2
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 359
Article 359
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2006/112/EC
3. The uninterrupted rental of accommodation for a maximum of 457 days with or without the provision of other ancillary services shall be regarded as having a similar function to the hotel sector.;
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 194 – paragraph 1
Article 194 – paragraph 1
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 369b
Article 369b
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 369b
Article 369b
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 27
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 27
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 369xh – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 369xh – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The VAT return shall be made out in euroin a legal tender within the Union.