BETA

13 Amendments of Antonio TAJANI related to 2021/0341(COD)

Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b a (new)
Directive (EU) 36/2013
Article 21a – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
(b a) in paragraph 4, subparagraph 2 is replaced by the following: Financial holding companies or mixed financial holding companies exempted from approval in accordance with this paragraph shall not be excluded from the perimeter of consolidation as laid down in this Directive and in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02013L0036-20220101 unless, upon request of the financial holding company or mixed financial holding company, the competent authority identifies a composition of the group other than the one designated. In particular, the financial holding company or mixed financial holding company may not be considered the parent company where, in the opinion of the competent Authorities, the following conditions are met: i) the company has a statutory prohibition to assume management and coordination functions; ii) the company has no significant equity investments other than that in the company or bank as referred to in the following paragraph; iii) there is a bank or another company that is allowed and declares to exercise the management and coordination functions.’ Or. en
2022/08/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point b
Directive 2013/36/EU
Article 88 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
3. Member States shall ensure that institutions draw up, maintain and update individual statements setting out the roles and duties of each member of the management body, senior management and key function holders and a mapping of duties, including details of the reporting lines and the lines of responsibility,of key function holders and the persons who are part of the governance arrangements as referred to in Article 74 (1) and their duties approved by the management body.
2022/08/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 382 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point b
Directive 36/2013/EU
Article 88 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Member States shall ensure that the statements of duties and the mapping of the dutiroles are made available and communicated in due time, upon request, to the competent authorities.
2022/08/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 386 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point b
Directive 2013/36/EU
Article 88 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
EBA shall issue guidelines, in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, ensuring the implementation of this paragraph and its consistent application. EBA shall issue those guidelines by [OP please insert the date = 12 months from date of entry into force of this amending Directive].deleted
2022/08/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 409 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20
Directive 2013/36/EU
Article 91 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. The entities shall assess the suitability oftiming of the suitability assessment is subject to national law and takes place before or after the members of the management body before those members take up their positions. Where the entities conclude, based on the suitability assessment, that the member concerned does not fulfil the criteria and requirements set out in paragraph 1, the entities shall ensure that the member concerned does not take up the position considered.
2022/08/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 418 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20
HoweverWithout prejudice to the timing provided for in national law, where it is strictly necessary to replace a member of the management body immediately, the entities may assess the suitability of such replacement members after they have taken up their positions. The entities shall be able to duly justify such immediate replacement.
2022/08/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 443 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20
Directive 2013/36/EU
Article 91 b – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Competent authorities shall complete the assessment referred to in paragraph 1 within 840 working days (‘assessment period’) as from the date of the written acknowledgement referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph.
2022/08/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 457 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20
Directive 2013/36/EU
Article 91 b – paragraph 4
4. Competent authorities that request from the entities additional information or documentation, including interviews or hearings, may extend the assessment period for a maximum of 420 working days. However, the assessment period shall not exceed 1260 working days. Request for additional information or documentation shall be made in writing and shall be specific. The entities shall acknowledge receipt of request for additional information or documentation within two working days and provide the requested additional information or documentation within 10 working days as of the date of the written acknowledgement of the request from competent authorities.
2022/08/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 469 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20
Directive 2013/36/EU
Article 91 b – paragraph 8
8. In accordance with paragraphs 1 to 7, competent authorities shall carry out the suitability assessment before members of the management body take up their positions in the following entities: (a) qualifies as large institution; (b) State that qualifies as large institution; (c) institution or that supervises large institutions affiliated to it; (d) stand-alone institution in the EU that qualifies as large institution; (e) (f) companies in a Member State, parent mixed financial holding companies in a Member State, EU parent financial holding companies and EU parent mixed financial holding companies, having large institutions or relevant subsidiaries within their group. However, where it is strictly necessary to replace a member of the management body immediately, competent authorities may carry out the suitability assessment of members of the management body after they take up their positions. The entities shall be able to duly justify such immediate replacement.deleted the EU parent institution that the parent institution in a Member central body that qualifies as large relevant subsidiary; the parent financial holding
2022/08/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 509 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 a (new)
Directive 2013/36/EU
Article 97 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
(22a) in Article 97(4), subparagraph 2 is replaced by the following: ‘When conducting the review and evaluation referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, competent authorities shall apply the principle of proportionality in accordance with the criteria disclosed pursuant to point (c) of Article 143(1). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02013L0036-20220101having regard to definitions set out in article 4, paragraph 1, from points 145 to point 146-bis of Regulation (EU) 575/2013 and, in accordance with the criteria disclosed pursuant to point (c) of Article 143(1). For entities referred to in Article 4, paragraph 1, point 146a of Regulation (EU)575/2013 competent authorities shall take into account the fact that subsidiaries and affiliated undertakings are all small and non-complex or less significant institutions.’ Or. en
2022/08/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 515 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 -a (new)
Directive (EU) 36/2013
Article 98 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) the business model of the institution22a) in Article 98(1), point (i) is replaced by the following: (i) the business model of the institution, including those essential features defined in national law as for entities referred to in art. 4, point 146-bis of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
2022/08/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 573 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 32 a (new)
(32a) in Article 143(1), point c) is amended as follows: ‘(c) the general criteria and methodologies they use in the review and evaluation referred to in Article 97, including the criteria for applying the principle of proportionality as referred to in Article 97(4); https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02013L0036-20220101For the latter criteria and in respect to, at least, for small and non-complex institutions as defined in Article 4, paragraph 1, point 145 of Regulation (EU) No 2019/876 a positive impact on proportionality needs to be achieved by providing the following elements be unambiguously published in addition to the existing ones: (i) a simplified approach to individuate material risks; (ii) simplified approaches to quantify the single material risks under Chapter 2 (review processes) Section II (arrangements, processes and mechanisms of institutions) Sub-Section 2 (technical criteria concerning the organisation and treatment of risks) and under Article 98 of these Directive; (iii) guidance on scope, methodologies, scenario and data for small and non- complex institutions’ stress testing;’ Or. en
2022/08/22
Committee: ECON
Amendment 579 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
The provisions necessary to comply with the amendments set out in Article 1, point (20), on suitability assessment shall apply from [OP please insert the date = 24 months from date of application of this amending Directive].
2022/08/22
Committee: ECON