Activities of Lukas SIEPER
Plenary speeches (64)
Outcome of the Strategic Dialogue on the Future of EU Agriculture (debate)
Persistent problems of anti-Semitism in Europe and of other forms of hate speech and hate crimes (debate)
Global measures towards social media platforms - Strengthening the role of DSA and protecting democracy and freedom in the online sphere (debate)
The Hungarian “National Card” scheme and its consequences for Schengen and the area of freedom, security and justice (debate)
The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the “Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice”
The severe situation of political prisoners in Belarus
The case of José Daniel Ferrer García in Cuba
Droughts and extreme weather events as a threat to local communities and EU agriculture in times of climate change (debate)
One year after the 7 October terrorist attacks by Hamas (debate)
Preparation of the European Council of 17-18 October 2024 (debate)
The crisis facing the EU’s automotive industry, potential plant closures and the need to enhance competitiveness and maintain jobs in Europe (debate)
The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in Georgia (debate)
Outcome of the Summit of the Future: transforming global governance for building peace, promoting human rights and achieving the sustainable development goals (debate)
World Mental Health Day - need for a comprehensive EU strategy on mental health (debate)
Composition of committees and delegations
Consequences of the devastating forest fires in the Amazon and the importance of the Amazon for climate change (debate)
Empowering the Single Market to deliver a sustainable future and prosperity for all EU citizens (debate)
Implementation of the Single European Sky (recast) (debate)
A stronger Europe for safer products to better protect consumers and tackle unfair competition: boosting EU oversight in e-commerce and imports (debate)
One-minute speeches (Rule 179)
Establishing the Ukraine Loan Cooperation Mechanism and providing exceptional macro-financial assistance to Ukraine (debate)
Establishing the Ukraine Loan Cooperation Mechanism and providing exceptional macro-financial assistance to Ukraine (debate)
General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sections (debate)
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (debate)
Situation in Azerbaijan, violation of human rights and international law and relations with Armenia (debate)
Managing migration in an effective and holistic way through fostering returns (debate)
Continued war crimes committed by the Russian Federation, notably killing Ukrainian prisoners of war (debate)
Findings of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women on Poland's abortion law (debate)
Seven years from the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia: lack of progress in restoring the rule of law in Malta (debate)
Abuse of new technologies to manipulate and radicalise young people through hate speech and antidemocratic discourse (debate)
Resumption of the sitting
Protecting our oceans: persistent threats to marine protected areas in the EU and benefits for coastal communities (debate)
The devastating floods in Spain, the urgent need to support the victims, to improve preparedness and to fight the climate crisis (debate)
UN Climate Change Conference 2024 in Baku, Azerbaijan (COP29) (debate)
Georgia's worsening democratic crisis following the recent parliamentary elections and alleged electoral fraud (debate)
Deplorable escalation of violence around the football match in the Netherlands and the unacceptable attacks against Israeli football fans (debate)
Fight against money laundering and terrorist financing: listing Russia as a high-risk third country in the EU (debate)
Fight against money laundering and terrorist financing: listing Russia as a high-risk third country in the EU (debate)
Amendment of the EIB's Statute (A10-0013/2024 - Joachim Streit) (vote)
UN Climate Change Conference 2024 in Baku, Azerbaijan (COP29) (B10-0156/2024)
EU actions against the Russian shadow fleets and ensuring a full enforcement of sanctions against Russia (RC-B10-0161/2024)
International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women (debate)
Reinforcing EU’s unwavering support to Ukraine against Russia’s war of aggression and the increasing military cooperation between North Korea and Russia (debate)
2025 budgetary procedure: Joint text (debate)
Question Time with Commissioners - Challenges in the implementation of cohesion policy
Outcome of COP 29 and challenges for international climate policy (debate)
Full accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Schengen Area: the urgent need to lift controls at internal land borders (debate)
Prison conditions in the EU (debate)
Presentation by the Commission President-elect of the College of Commissioners and its programme (debate)
Stepping up the fight against and the prevention of the recruitment of minors for criminal acts (debate)
Critical infrastructure vulnerabilities and hybrid threats in the Baltic Sea (debate)
Rise of energy prices and fighting energy poverty (debate)
Recent legislation targeting LGBTQI persons and the need for protecting the rule of law and a discrimination-free Union (debate)
Promoting a favourable framework for venture capital financing and safe foreign direct investments in the EU (debate)
Strengthening children’s rights in the EU - 35th anniversary of the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (debate)
Foreign interference and espionage by third country actors in European universities (debate)
Resumption of the sitting
Need to adopt an ambitious international legally binding agreement on plastic pollution, including in the marine environment
Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2023 (debate)
Regional Emergency Support: RESTORE (debate)
Right to clean drinking water in the EU (debate)
A European Innovation Act: lowering the cost of innovating in Europe (debate)
Conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the United Nations Convention on transparency in treaty-based investor-State arbitration (short presentation)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
Institutional motions (3)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the cases of unjustly imprisoned Uyghurs in China, notably Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Iraq, notably the situation of women’s rights and the recent proposal to amend the Personal Status Law
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the increasing and systematic repression of women in Iran
Written explanations (14)
Deforestation Regulation: provisions relating to the date of application
We are facing the very real and urgent possibility of climate catastrophe. We from the Party of Progress recognise that tackling this crisis requires bold, immediate action. This is why we strongly support the Deforestation Regulation, and believe that we cannot delay its provisions demanding businesses monitor their supply chains for both environmental and human rights violations. These measures are crucial, not only for protecting our planet but also for safeguarding the dignity and rights of vulnerable communities affected by deforestation.With this in mind, I chose to vote against both the proposal to delay the application of the regulation and the additional amendments aimed at loosening EU restrictions and obligations. I fully acknowledge that companies will need time and resources to adapt to these changes. However, time is precisely what we do not have. Every moment we wait is a step closer to irreversible environmental damage. This is why I voted against the proposal to delay the Deforestation Regulation: the task before us is monumental, and we must begin without hesitation.
Deforestation Regulation: provisions relating to the date of application
We are facing the very real and urgent possibility of climate catastrophe. We from the Party of Progress recognise that tackling this crisis requires bold, immediate action. This is why we strongly support the Deforestation Regulation, and believe that we cannot delay its provisions demanding businesses monitor their supply chains for both environmental and human rights violations. These measures are crucial, not only for protecting our planet but also for safeguarding the dignity and rights of vulnerable communities affected by deforestation.With this in mind, I chose to vote against both the proposal to delay the application of the regulation and the additional amendments aimed at loosening EU restrictions and obligations. I fully acknowledge that companies will need time and resources to adapt to these changes. However, time is precisely what we do not have. Every moment we wait is a step closer to irreversible environmental damage. This is why I voted against the proposal to delay the Deforestation Regulation: the task before us is monumental, and we must begin without hesitation.
Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603
Today I chose to vote against the Commission’s proposal to authorise the placement of GMOs in EU markets, instead supporting the objections raised by my colleagues. I believe that the Commission’s draft is indeed inconsistent with EU Regulation 1829/2003, which requires us to ensure in all measures a high level of protection of human life and health, animal health and welfare, and environmental and consumer interests.While the EFSA has approved their safety, there is much we do not know about GMOs regarding their long-term environmental and health risks, and this decision will inevitably hurt smaller European businesses and farmers. We have measures in place to protect our citizens and our businesses for a reason. These same measures should be applied fairly and equally to all our trade partners. As such, I have decided to follow the precautionary principle, prioritising fairness and environmental concerns, by voting in favour of these objections.
Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified cotton COT102
Today I chose to vote against the Commission’s proposal to authorise the placement of GMOs in EU markets, instead supporting the objections raised by my colleagues. I believe that the Commission’s draft is indeed inconsistent with EU Regulation 1829/2003, which requires us to ensure in all measures a high level of protection of human life and health, animal health and welfare, and environmental and consumer interests.While the EFSA has approved their safety, there is much we do not know about GMOs regarding their long-term environmental and health risks, and this decision will inevitably hurt smaller European businesses and farmers. We have measures in place to protect our citizens and our businesses for a reason. These same measures should be applied fairly and equally to all our trade partners. As such, I have decided to follow the precautionary principle, prioritising fairness and environmental concerns, by voting in favour of these objections.
Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 88017 × 59122 and eight of its sub-combinations
Today I chose to vote against the Commission’s proposal to authorise the placement of GMOs in EU markets, instead supporting the objections raised by my colleagues. I believe that the Commission’s draft is indeed inconsistent with EU Regulation 1829/2003, which requires us to ensure in all measures a high level of protection of human life and health, animal health and welfare, and environmental and consumer interests.While the EFSA has approved their safety, there is much we do not know about GMOs regarding their long-term environmental and health risks, and this decision will inevitably hurt smaller European businesses and farmers. We have measures in place to protect our citizens and our businesses for a reason. These same measures should be applied fairly and equally to all our trade partners. As such, I have decided to follow the precautionary principle, prioritising fairness and environmental concerns, by voting in favour of these objections.
Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize MON 810
Today I chose to vote against the Commission’s proposal to authorise the placement of GMOs in EU markets, instead supporting the objections raised by my colleagues. I believe that the Commission’s draft is indeed inconsistent with EU Regulation 1829/2003, which requires us to ensure in all measures a high level of protection of human life and health, animal health and welfare, and environmental and consumer interests.While the EFSA has approved their safety, there is much we do not know about GMOs regarding their long-term environmental and health risks, and this decision will inevitably hurt smaller European businesses and farmers. We have measures in place to protect our citizens and our businesses for a reason. These same measures should be applied fairly and equally to all our trade partners. As such, I have decided to follow the precautionary principle, prioritising fairness and environmental concerns, by voting in favour of these objections.
Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize DP915635
Today I chose to vote against the Commission’s proposal to authorise the placement of GMOs in EU markets, instead supporting the objections raised by my colleagues. I believe that the Commission’s draft is indeed inconsistent with EU Regulation 1829/2003, which requires us to ensure in all measures a high level of protection of human life and health, animal health and welfare, and environmental and consumer interests.While the EFSA has approved their safety, there is much we do not know about GMOs regarding their long-term environmental and health risks, and this decision will inevitably hurt smaller European businesses and farmers. We have measures in place to protect our citizens and our businesses for a reason. These same measures should be applied fairly and equally to all our trade partners. As such, I have decided to follow the precautionary principle, prioritising fairness and environmental concerns, by voting in favour of these objections.
Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize DP23211
Today I chose to vote against the Commission’s proposal to authorise the placement of GMOs in EU markets, instead supporting the objections raised by my colleagues. I believe that the Commission’s draft is indeed inconsistent with EU Regulation 1829/2003, which requires us to ensure in all measures a high level of protection of human life and health, animal health and welfare, and environmental and consumer interests.While the EFSA has approved their safety, there is much we do not know about GMOs regarding their long-term environmental and health risks, and this decision will inevitably hurt smaller European businesses and farmers. We have measures in place to protect our citizens and our businesses for a reason. These same measures should be applied fairly and equally to all our trade partners. As such, I have decided to follow the precautionary principle, prioritising fairness and environmental concerns, by voting in favour of these objections.
Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize DP202216
Today I chose to vote against the Commission’s proposal to authorise the placement of GMOs in EU markets, instead supporting the objections raised by my colleagues. I believe that the Commission’s draft is indeed inconsistent with EU Regulation 1829/2003, which requires us to ensure in all measures a high level of protection of human life and health, animal health and welfare, and environmental and consumer interests.While the EFSA has approved their safety, there is much we do not know about GMOs regarding their long-term environmental and health risks, and this decision will inevitably hurt smaller European businesses and farmers. We have measures in place to protect our citizens and our businesses for a reason. These same measures should be applied fairly and equally to all our trade partners. As such, I have decided to follow the precautionary principle, prioritising fairness and environmental concerns, by voting in favour of these objections.
Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize MON 94804
Today I chose to vote against the Commission’s proposal to authorise the placement of GMOs in EU markets, instead supporting the objections raised by my colleagues. I believe that the Commission’s draft is indeed inconsistent with EU Regulation 1829/2003, which requires us to ensure in all measures a high level of protection of human life and health, animal health and welfare, and environmental and consumer interests.While the EFSA has approved their safety, there is much we do not know about GMOs regarding their long-term environmental and health risks, and this decision will inevitably hurt smaller European businesses and farmers. We have measures in place to protect our citizens and our businesses for a reason. These same measures should be applied fairly and equally to all our trade partners. As such, I have decided to follow the precautionary principle, prioritising fairness and environmental concerns, by voting in favour of these objections.
Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize MON 94804
Today I chose to vote against the Commission’s proposal to authorise the placement of GMOs in EU markets, instead supporting the objections raised by my colleagues. I believe that the Commission’s draft is indeed inconsistent with EU Regulation 1829/2003, which requires us to ensure in all measures a high level of protection of human life and health, animal health and welfare, and environmental and consumer interests.While the EFSA has approved their safety, there is much we do not know about GMOs regarding their long-term environmental and health risks, and this decision will inevitably hurt smaller European businesses and farmers. We have measures in place to protect our citizens and our businesses for a reason. These same measures should be applied fairly and equally to all our trade partners. As such, I have decided to follow the precautionary principle, prioritising fairness and environmental concerns, by voting in favour of these objections.
Georgia's worsening democratic crisis following the recent parliamentary elections and alleged electoral fraud
We are in a time of democratic crisis, both at home and abroad. Georgia’s recent parliamentary elections raised concerns about alleged electoral fraud and fairness, and as such, I chose to support the JMR put forward by my colleagues. In doing so, I voted in favour of democracy–by reaffirming EU values and supporting sanctions on officials responsible for democratic backsliding, violations of electoral rules, misuse of state institutions. I voted in favour of gender equality, keeping in mind the diminishing political representation of women, and of fairness and accountability, by choosing to apply EU standards to all our partners fairly, and to review Georgia’s visa-free status. We cannot compromise on our respect for fundamental rights, and I believe my votes today reflected that commitment.
Reinforcing EU’s unwavering support to Ukraine against Russia’s war of aggression and the increasing military cooperation between North Korea and Russia
My votes today reaffirm my unwavering solidarity with Ukraine and all that it entails: continued political, financial, and military support, as well as strengthened sanctions against Russia and freezing of key assets. Russia’s aggression in Ukraine is a challenge to our democratic values and institutions, so today this Chamber has let it be known that the European Union does not respond to aggression or tyrants, and we certainly will not allow nuclear intimidation to become a legitimate tool of diplomacy.While peace is the ultimate goal in Ukraine, there are some non-negotiable conditions on which we will not compromise: territorial integrity and sovereignty, Russian accountability and reparations, and respect for international law. These are European values and they are Ukrainian values. We must protect them.
Recommendation on smoke- and aerosol-free environments
Promoting smoke- and aerosol-free environments is an important step in furthering public health and the EU Beating Cancer Plan. Cigarettes, as well as new emerging products like e-cigarettes or HTPs, have been proven to be incredibly damaging for both the consumer and for bystanders nearby. Keeping key public areas free from smoking will protect both smokers and non-smokers, and in particular vulnerable groups (children and youth, pregnant people, the elderly, and people with existing health conditions).More concrete action is required to meet the targets of our deeply important Beating Cancer Plan, which tackles one of the leading current challenges to public health. With this in mind, I supported the Commission’s recommendation and the initial JMR. When this failed, I chose pragmatism: I supported several standard MRs from my colleagues and their political groups. Despite the outcome today, we must still keep fighting to protect public health and I am deeply committed to this project.
Written questions (2)
Protection of wild animals during the harvest season
Ecocide