BETA

Activities of Corien WORTMANN-KOOL related to 2012/0150(COD)

Plenary speeches (1)

Framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms - Deposit guarantee schemes (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0150(COD)

Amendments (14)

Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘resolution’ means the restructuring of an institution in order to ensure the continuity of its essential functions, and preserve financial stability and restin order fore the viability of all or part of that institutioninstitution to be wound down in an orderly manner;
2012/12/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member States shall designate one or more resolution authoritiesy that areis empowered to apply the resolution tools and exercise the resolution powers.
2012/12/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 341 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 7
7. Where a Member State designates more than one authority to apply the resolution tools and exercise the resolution powers, it shall allocate functions and responsibilities clearly between these authorities, ensure adequate coordination between them and designate a single authority as a contact authority for the purposes of cooperation and coordination with the relevant authorities of other Member States.deleted
2012/12/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 467 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that parent undertakings or institutions that are subject to consolidated supervision pursuant to Articles 125 and 126 of Directive 2006/48/EC draw up and submit to the consolidating supervisor a group recovery plan that includes a recovery plan for the whole group, including for the companies referred to in points (c) and (d) of Article 1, as well as a recovery plan for each institution that is part of the group. The group recovery plan should include plans for recovery at the level of the parent undertaking subject to consolidated supervision but also at the level of the individual subsidiaries. Any credit institution within the scope of a group recovery plan shall not be obliged to meet the requirements as set out in Article 5.
2013/01/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 490 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 6
6. The management body of the parent undertaking or institution subject to consolidated supervision referred to in paragraph 1 and the management body of institutions that are part of the group shall approve the group recovery plan before submitting it to the consolidating supervisor.
2013/01/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 985 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 30 – paragraph 2
2. Without prejudice to the Union State aid framework, where applicable, the valuation required by paragraph 1 shall be based on prudent and realistic assumptions, including as to rates of default and severity of losses, and its objective shall be to assess the market value of the assets and liabilities of the institution that is failing or is likely to fail so that any losses that could be derived arepresent and future losses are fully recogniszed at the moment the resolution tools are exercised. However, whnd a proper assumption can be made in ordere the market for a specific asset or liability is not functioning properly the valuation may reflect the long term economic value of those assets or liabilitieo allow for the use of resolution tools. Valuation shall not assume the provision of extraordinary public support to the institution, regardless of whether it is actually provided.
2012/12/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 999 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 30 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) the circumstances where the market for a specific asset or liability can be considered as not functioning properly;deleted
2012/12/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1000 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 30 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point e
(e) the methodology for assessing the long term economic value of the assets and liabilities of the institution that is failing or likely fail;deleted
2012/12/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1062 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 37 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall ensure that resolution authorities may apply the bail- in tool for the purpose referred to in point (a) of paragraph 2 only if there is a realistic prospect that the application of that tool, in conjunction with measures implemented in accordance with the business reorganisation plan required by Article 47 will, in addition to achieving relevant resolution objectives, restore the institution in question to financial soundness and long-term viability.deleted
2012/12/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1068 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 37 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
If the condition set out in the first subparagraph is not fulfilled, Member States shall apply any of the resolution tools referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) of Article 31 (2), and the bail-in tool referred to in point (b) of paragraph 2 of this Article, as appropriate.deleted
2012/12/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1164 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(e a) EBA shall define a separate class of eligible liabilities referred to in paragraph 1. In this case the resolution authorities will exercise the write down and conversion powers first to these liabilities. The resolution authorities will exercise the write down and conversion powers only to other liabilities in case the write down and conversion of this separate class of eligible liabilities is not sufficient to fully fulfil the requirements as defined in Article 37, paragraph 2.
2012/12/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1171 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 39 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. The minimum aggregate amount pursuant to paragraph 1 shall be determined on the basis of the following criteria:by EBA setting one harmonized minimum aggregate amount of required bail-in debt for all banks.
2012/12/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1608 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 99 – paragraph 2
2. Unless Member States shall ensure that, under the national law governing normal insolvency proceedingsdecide otherwise, the depositor guarantee schemes rank pari passu withshall rank senior to unsecured non- preferred claims under national law governing insolvency proceedings.
2012/12/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1668 #
Proposal for a directive
Annex 1 – section 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
(8) a detailed description of the processes for determining the value and marketability of the core business lines, operations and assets of the institution and the effectiveness and viability of other potential measures included in the recovery plan;
2012/12/20
Committee: ECON