Activities of Jacek SARYUSZ-WOLSKI related to 2020/2133(INI)
Shadow reports (1)
REPORT on strengthening transparency and integrity in the EU institutions by setting up an independent EU ethics body
Amendments (16)
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Believes that a single independent EU ethics body is necessary to ensure the consistent and full implementation of ethics standards across the EU institutions; pProposes the conclusion of an interinstitutional agreement (IIA) to set up an EU Ethics Body for Parliament and the Commission open to the participation of all EU institutions, agencies and bodies; recommends that the IIA contain the following provisions:
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – introductory part
Paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Considers that the new advisory EU Ethics Body should be delegated a list of competences to implement ethics rules for Members and staff; takes the view that this list should include by way of a minimum the competences provided for in:
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that the participating institutions should entrust the EU Ethics Body with monitoring powers over ethics standards, as well as advisory, investigative and enforcementadvisory powers;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Considers that this monitoring capacity should include the verificationRecommends empowering the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) ofr the veracity of the declaration of financial interests, the handlingEuropean Ombudsman with the responsibility to carry out oversight ofn conflicts of interests, checks on transparency obligations and the verification of compliance with revolving doors rulrevolving doors and lobby transparency for EU institutions and agencies;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Brings attention to the point that if this advisory body is established, its functioning should not overlap or conflict with internal ethics committees in the EU institutions, the Transparency Register secretariat, the European Anti-Fraud Office and the European Ombudsman;
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Believes that the decision on the absence of conflicts of interest of Commissioners-designate should remain a competence of Parliament’s Committee on Legal Affairs, while the EU Ethics Body should support the process with the publication of its analysis of each individual case and make its investigative capacities available;
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 3
Subheading 3
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Insists that the college be supported by a secretariat with the human, material and financial resources commensurate with its mandate and taskDoubts the necessity of establishing a new interinstitutional body, as it might lead to additional financial expenditure on top of the existing bodies at the EU level which are already dealing with similar issues;
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Proposes a two-stepn approach whereby, in the event that the EU Ethics Body becomes aware of a breach or possible breach of ethics rules, it first recommends actions to put an end to the breach; considers that this first preventive step should ensure confidentiality and the right of the person to be heard; suggests that in the event that the individual concerned refuses to take the appropriate actions, the EU Ethics Body should make relevant information about the case publicly available and decide, if appropriate, on sanctions; considers that this two-step approach should apply provided that there are no reasonable grounds to believe that the individual acted in bad faith and recommends that intentional breach, gross negligence, the concealment of evidence and non- compliance with the obligation to cooperate should be, as such, subject to sanctions, even when the breach itself has ceased;
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18