BETA

Activities of Tadeusz ZWIEFKA related to 2014/2252(INI)

Plenary speeches (1)

Annual reports 2012-2013 on subsidiarity and proportionality (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2252(INI)

Shadow reports (1)

REPORT on the Annual reports 2012-2013 on subsidiarity and proportionality PDF (178 KB) DOC (132 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: JURI
Dossiers: 2014/2252(INI)
Documents: PDF(178 KB) DOC(132 KB)

Amendments (5)

Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital L a (new)
La. whereas the subsidiarity and proportionality check as well as an impact assessment are done only at the beginning of the legislative process
2015/06/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Questions some of the assumptions madethe methodology of the Commission in the 2012 and 2013 Annual reports, such as that ofwhich in its statistics classifyingies reasoned opinions submitted by national parliaments on a package of proposals as only one reasoned opinion, rather than a reasoned opinion on each one of the individual proposals; believes that this is an inappropriate assumption, as objections raised on a package should be considered as an objection on each legislative proposal;
2015/06/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that, when taken as a whole, the proportion of reasoned opinions has increased significantly as a percentage of total submissions when compared to 2010 and 2011; notes that in 2012 reasoned opinions represented 25 % of all submissions, while in 2013 they accounted for 30 % of submissions from national parliaments under the Protocol 2 process; expresses concern that an increasing proportion of the submissions made by national parliaments are raising strong reservations about compliance with subsidiaritynotice in this view the greater inclusion of the national parliaments in the legislative process;
2015/06/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Believes that a stronger approach is needed to fully recognise the principle of subsidiarity; considers therefore that the introduction of a stronger ‘red card' procedure could be a positive first step; suggests that consideration should be given to what the appropriate number of national parliament responses should be in order to trigger such a procedure, whether it should be limited to subsidiarity alone or include proportionality grounds, and what its effect should be; views such a discussion as a useful stage in the evolution of the power given to national parliaments, aligning incentives to exercise scrutiny with effects at European level;deleted
2015/06/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Considers that the introduction of a ‘green card' could also be considered, which would afford national parliaments the opportunity to propose the introduction, amendment or repeal of Union legislation; suggests that similar consideration would be required on the number of responses required to trigger such a procedure, and the extent of its impact;deleted
2015/06/03
Committee: JURI