4 Amendments of Marco CAMPOMENOSI related to 2020/2007(INI)
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Regrets that insufficientcomplete national implementation of existing legislation continues to seriously hamper the free mobility of workers within the EU to the detriment of workers and the European economy as a whole;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that while it is a competence of Member States to regulate a certain profession, they must respect the limits of the principles of non- discrimination and proportionality, as explicitly stipulated in the Proportionality Test Directive; regrets that the assessment of proportionality is rarely carried out; calls on the Commission to define the concept of proportionality more precisely and to provide Member States with practical guidelines for its application;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls that the Services Directive and the PQD build on the principle of mutual recognition to facilitate free movement of services; calls on the Member States to extend mutual recognition to more levels of education and to improve or introduce the necessary procedures as soon as possible; recalls that the country of destination principle was not included in the Services Directive;
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. EncouragesCalls on the Commission to fully enforce existing rulnot to exceed its competences disproportionately and, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, to give the Member States room for development in their policies and legislation on the free movement of workers and services; calls for alternative resolution mechanisms to be assessed and for infringement procedures to be applied swiftly and rigorously whenever breaches of relevant legislation are identified or disproportionate non-regulatory burdens introduced;