Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | EMPL | KANEV Radan ( EPP) | HOMS GINEL Alicia ( S&D), VEDRENNE Marie-Pierre ( Renew), MATTHIEU Sara ( Verts/ALE), JAMET France ( ID), RAFALSKA Elżbieta ( ECR), BOTENGA Marc ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | IMCO | LØKKEGAARD Morten ( Renew) | Sándor RÓNAI ( S&D) |
Committee Opinion | AGRI | TOMAŠIĆ Ruža ( ECR) | Jarosław KALINOWSKI ( PPE), Joëlle MÉLIN ( ID), Sarah WIENER ( Verts/ALE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 516 votes to 79, with 99 abstentions, a resolution on impacts of EU rules on the free movements of workers and services: intra-EU labour mobility as a tool to match labour market needs and skills.
Noting that there was no need to change the country of destination provision that guides the services directive, Members argued that the free movement of services goes hand in hand with the free and fair mobility of the workforce providing those services, and that respecting the rules on working conditions and health and safety protection of mobile workers benefits the internal market.
Improved protection for mobile workers
The protection of mobile workers’ working and living conditions based on the principle of equal treatment must cover the free movement of workers as well as the freedom to provide services. Members expressed concern about the continuing shortcomings in the protection of mobile workers , especially cross-border and frontier workers, highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
The resolution stressed that workers should not be disadvantaged in any way by the fact that they have exercised their right to free movement or by EU rules on the freedom to provide services. It highlighted the need to remedy any regulatory gaps at EU and Member State level as soon as possible.
Deploring the current lack of harmonised interpretation of EU law by Member States, in particular the recently amended Posting of Workers Directive , Parliament urged the Commission to assist Member States directly throughout the transposition process. It called on Member States to make use of the possibility to apply the provisions on pay and conditions in all collective agreements to all posted workers in the EU, and to ensure the principle of equal pay for equal work in the same place for workers and fair conditions of competition for companies.
The Commission and the Member States were asked, inter alia, to:
- ensure compliance with applicable laws and rules on employment conditions when dealing with third country nationals, who are often more vulnerable to exploitation;
- recognise mobile workers in strategic supply chains for the manufacture of, for example, medical devices as essential or critical;
- examine protection gaps to ensure decent working and living conditions for mobile workers and prevent abusive practices;
- properly implement EU legislation on subcontracting and ensure overall joint and several liability throughout the subcontracting chain to protect workers' rights.
Members stressed that the objectives of the European Pillar of Social Rights, the UN Sustainable Development Goals, the European Green Deal and the Gender Equality Strategy must also be reflected in the approach to the single market, promoting high social and environmental standards as a prerequisite for productivity increases.
European Labour Authority (ELA)
Parliament called on the Commission to give priority to making the ELA fully operational in order to support the implementation, enforcement and monitoring of EU law on labour mobility. The ELA should be provided with sufficient resources to carry out its mission and focus on improving compliance with and implementation of existing EU law to ensure fair and equal competition in the single market.
Members called for the ELA to be given real powers of labour inspection in a cross-border context, in cooperation with the competent national authorities. They called on the ELA to improve data collection and set up real-time databases on labour mobility for analysis and risk assessment.
The Commission and the ELA should be able to investigate cases of denial of access to the labour market and of abuse and discrimination based on nationality in relation to working conditions, which became very visible during the COVID-19 crisis. The ELA is invited to develop accessible, transparent and non-discriminatory procedures to enable national social partners to take up cases, and to ensure effective follow-up.
Other recommendations
The Commission was also invited, inter alia , to:
- strengthen the capacities of the competent national authorities and the social partners and their cooperation, in order to ensure fair rights-based mobility on the information of workers and employers on their rights and obligations and an effective fight against social security fraud and abusive practices;
- propose a European framework for combating unfair competition on labour costs to ensure full compliance with the principles of equal treatment and equal pay and labour costs for equal work in the same place;
- present without delay its proposal for a digital European Social Security Number (ESSN) , ensuring compliance with personal data protection rules;
- present a proposal for a directive on work-related stress and musculoskeletal disorders, a proposal for a directive on mental wellbeing in the workplace and an EU strategy on mental health;
- promote and improve existing mutual recognition mechanisms and job mobility portals that help facilitate and promote transparent mobility.
Parliament called on Member States to address the problem of undeclared work , in particular with regard to seasonal activities, and to ensure adequate coordination in the field of social security, notably in the context of the ongoing revision of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004, as well as the improvement of the portability of rights, in particular with regard to the portability of social security benefits for people with disabilities.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2021)507
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0249/2021
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0066/2021
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0066/2021
- Committee opinion: PE657.157
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE662.032
- Committee opinion: PE648.630
- Committee draft report: PE660.195
- Committee draft report: PE660.195
- Committee opinion: PE648.630
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE662.032
- Committee opinion: PE657.157
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0066/2021
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2021)507
Activities
Votes
Incidence de la réglementation de l’Union sur la libre circulation des travailleurs et des services: la mobilité de la main-d’œuvre au sein de l’Union, un instrument pour faire coïncider besoins du marché du travail et compétences - Impacts of EU rules on the free movements of workers and services: intra-EU labour mobility as a tool to match labour market needs and skills - Auswirkungen der EU-Vorschriften auf die Arbeitnehmerfreizügigkeit und den freien Dienstleistungsverkehr: Arbeitskräftemobilität innerhalb der EU als Instrument zur Abstimmung von Anforderungen und Kompetenzen auf dem Arbeitsmarkt - A9-0066/2021 - Radan Kanev - Am 1 #
A9-0066/2021 - Radan Kanev - § 16/1 #
A9-0066/2021 - Radan Kanev - § 16/2 #
A9-0066/2021 - Radan Kanev - § 27/1 #
A9-0066/2021 - Radan Kanev - § 27/2 #
A9-0066/2021 - Radan Kanev - § 41/1 #
A9-0066/2021 - Radan Kanev - § 41/2 #
A9-0066/2021 - Radan Kanev - Considérant D/1 #
A9-0066/2021 - Radan Kanev - Considérant D/2 #
Incidence de la réglementation de l’Union sur la libre circulation des travailleurs et des services: la mobilité de la main-d’œuvre au sein de l’Union, un instrument pour faire coïncider besoins du marché du travail et compétences - Impacts of EU rules on the free movements of workers and services: intra-EU labour mobility as a tool to match labour market needs and skills - Auswirkungen der EU-Vorschriften auf die Arbeitnehmerfreizügigkeit und den freien Dienstleistungsverkehr: Arbeitskräftemobilität innerhalb der EU als Instrument zur Abstimmung von Anforderungen und Kompetenzen auf dem Arbeitsmarkt - A9-0066/2021 - Radan Kanev - Proposition de résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
187 |
2020/2007(INI)
2020/10/02
AGRI
101 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Citation 1 Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Citation 2 b (new) - having regard to Article 45 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),
Amendment 100 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Highlights that, as enshrined in the TFEU, the EU does not have the competence to intervene on the setting of pay or minimum wages;
Amendment 101 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Notes with regret the COVID-19 infections that have occurred at plants that make extensive use of posted workers;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Citation 2 c (new) - having regard to the Communication of the European Commission of 16 July 2020 ‘Guidelines on Seasonal Workers in the EU in the Context of the Covid-19 Outbreak’,
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas the principle of the free movement of workers is enshrined in Article 45 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, but EU citizenship alone does not prevent migrant workers from being in a condition of vulnerability and being involved in situations of exploitation, including inits most severe forms;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) A a. whereas labour mobility should not only be free but also fair; whereas the principle of equal treatment is enshrined in Article 45(2) of the TFEU, forbidding any discrimination based on nationality between workers of the Member States as regards employment, remuneration and other conditions of work and employment; whereas this principle applies equally to cross border and seasonal workers, who must be guaranteed equal treatment with workers who are nationals of their host Member State in line with EU legislation, whether it be equal rights, equal working conditions or equal protection;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) A a. whereas Article 153(5) TFEU makes clear that the setting of minimum wages is a national competence and forbids the EU to intervene directly on the level of pay;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) B a. whereas agriculture is a sector with a strong reliance on temporary labour, work which is mostly seasonal in nature with peaks and high employment of migrant workers to meet the needs and demands of sector;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas, according to the study entitled ‘The EU farming employment: current challenges and future prospects’, temporary workers account for just 8% of all workers in the agricultural sector;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas agricultural activity is the main backbone of the economic and social fabric in rural areas;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) B a. whereas seasonal workers have been considered essential workers and exposed to health risks during the pandemic restrictions;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) B a. whereas an estimated 800 000 to 1 million seasonal workers are being hired in the EU each year, mainly in the agri- food sector;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Citation 1 a (new) – having regard to Directive 2014/54/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on measures facilitating the exercise of rights conferred on workers in the context of freedom of movement for workers;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas there is a shortfall of workers in the agricultural sector;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas, in 2011, the share of foreign labour in the EU agricultural sector was 1.6% for workers from Member States (intra-EU labour) and 2.7% for workers from non-EU countries (extra-EU labour);
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas the COVID-19 crisis has shown the pressing need to ensure that we are self-sufficient when it comes to food and therefore to maintain and create high-quality jobs in the food and agriculture industry;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Recital B b (new) B b. whereas COVID-19 highlighted the crucial role of seasonal workers for ensuring food security and the smooth functioning of the food supply chain at the peak of the public health crisis;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Recital B c (new) Bc. whereas national restrictions and curbs on the free movement of workers introduced in response to COVID-19 have made it difficult for seasonal workers to travel across internal borders to their destination countries, thereby paralysing part of the agricultural sector;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Recital B c (new) Bc. whereas the European Union has already introduced a host of instruments to promote labour mobility, including EURES, Your Europe and Solvit, of which the public is largely unaware, meaning that the point of those instruments has to be called into question;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Recital B d (new) Bd. whereas labour mobility is specifically covered by the European Social Fund (ESF) and the EU programme for employment and social innovation (EaSI), and whereas the European Court of Auditors has pointed out that ‘the similarity of the respective objectives of the two EU funds supporting labour mobility (ESF and EaSI) makes complementarity between them challenging’ and that 'the way in which the ESF is used by all Member States for the support of labour mobility is not known by the Commission’;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Recital B d (new) Bd. whereas exports in the agricultural sector contribute to the achievement of the EU’s objectives in the areas of growth and jobs;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission’s legislative proposal of March 2018 for establishing a European Labour Authority to ensure that EU rules on labour mobility are enforced in a fair, simple and effective way and prevents limitations to such mobility within the European internal market, which some Member States apply with bureaucratic hurdles or additional measures, hampering access to work;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Citation 1 b (new) – having regard to the report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee of 4 December 2018 on the implementation of Directive 2014/54/EU on measures facilitating the exercise of rights conferred on workers in the context of freedom of movement for workers;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission’s legislative proposal of March 2018 for establishing a European Labour Authority to ensure that EU rules on labour mobility are enforced in a fair, simple and effective way; however regrets that the European Labour Authority is currently not planning to be fully operational before 2024;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Urges the ELA to promote actions to regulate, license and monitor recruitment agencies (including those based in third countries) and encourage agricultural business associations to adopt monitoring mechanisms and set common decent work standards;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Highlights the important and essential role of migrant and seasonal workers in responding to periodic and seasonal peaks in labour demand in the agricultural sector which local supply cannot meet;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Regrets the fact that this opinion aims to highlight the fact that European workers are finding it difficult to move around, when attention has already been drawn to the matter in previous texts;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that the free movement of workers, and especially seasonal workers, is vital for Europe's agriculture industry;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Takes this opportunity to reiterate the following observations set out in the minority opinion tabled on 20 November 2018 when the vote was taken on the proposal for a regulation establishing a European Labour Authority: ‘This new text is intended to make up for the inadequacy or inability in a number of areas, which the Commission acknowledges in its explanatory statement, by bringing them together to make them more efficient; however, the centralisation of failed tools can no more achieve the objectives that the Agency has set itself than was possible when those tools were independent; consequently, the current text would quickly prove to be inadequate; furthermore, in the form proposed, the Agency would not have the resources to tackle the major challenges it purports to address’;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. Notes that several Member States, such as Denmark, Italy and Spain, have in recent years experienced a significant increase in the share of migrant workers in agriculture;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1 c. Stresses the disproportionately negative impact movement restrictions introduced as a result of the COVID-19 crisis had on the availability of seasonal workers for necessary agricultural work and across the food supply chain as a whole, notes in this regard the importance of a fully functioning internal market with clear guidelines and uniform interpretation by the Member States;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Citation 1 c (new) – having regard to the European Court of Auditors’ Special Report No 6/2018 entitled ‘Free Movement of Workers – the fundamental freedom ensured but better targeting of EU funds would aid worker mobility’;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that better legal frameworks and a greater focus on the implementation and enforcement of labour law are urgently needed, including with regard to employment rights and social security coverage, especially for atypical work and exploited labour with cross- border and seasonal workers being particularly vulnerable;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that better legal frameworks and a greater focus on the implementation and enforcement of labour law are urgently needed, including with regard to employment rights and social security and medical coverage, especially for atypical work and exploited labour;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Calls for a swift implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights and in particular of Directive (EU) 2019/1152 on transparent and predictable working conditions, in order to guarantee - among others - the right to fair and equal treatment regarding working conditions, access to social protection and training for workers;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Emphasises, in that regard, that it is vital to acknowledge the work that women do in the agricultural sector, especially to ensure that spouses in the agricultural sector have an appropriate professional status that enables them to access social security coverage, training, maternity leave and a pension;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Notes with concern the precarious working and living conditions to which seasonal and cross-border workers are often exposed and calls on the Member State to ensure their equal treatment, social protection and access to healthcare;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Condemns the exploitation of workers in the agri-food sectors, which is a serious phenomenon affecting in particular seasonal and women workers; underlines that vulnerable workers, such as women and migrants, are at a particular risk of being subject to physical and psychological violence; calls therefore on the Commission and on Member States to strengthen the actions to prevent, suppress and punish exploitation and any other form of abuse;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that better targeting of EU funds would support worker mobility, enabling better use of the information available and improving the collection and use of data on the patterns of labour mobility flows and imbalances within the labour market; calls for support for protecting the workers exposed to risks in agri-food sector;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that better targeting of EU funds
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that better targeting of
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Citation 1 d (new) – having regard to the publication in the Official Journal on 11 July 2019 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1149 establishing a European Labour Authority, and the entry into force of that regulation on 31 July 2019;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Urges the Commission, in line with the recommendations made by the European Court of Auditors in Special Report No 6 2018, to refine its monitoring framework for EaSI-EURES cross- border-partnership projects, so that there is a clear link between targets, outputs and results at the application stage, in order to guarantee that funds are used efficiently and are genuinely useful;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Acknowledges the advances made by Member States regarding the protection of temporary farm workers; rejects the hoax and disinformation campaign surrounding the situation of farm workers; stresses that members of the European Union respect the rights of farm workers;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Emphasises that seasonal European agricultural workers often cannot predict way in advance their movements or the days they will spend in another Member State. Ad hoc rules and swift checks are therefore needed to enable them to move freely within the Union;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Highlights the need to link the Common Agricultural Policy and the EU social policies by making CAP Payments conditional on the respect of labour, health and safety as well as environmental provisions to promote equal treatment and environmental protection;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Urges the Commission to make sure that the Farm to Fork Strategy and the current revision of the Common Agriculture Policy deliver for agricultural workers in Europe, including seasonal, migrant and other mobile workers;
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Notes that there are isolated cases of serious breaches of labour law on some farms and calls for exemplary intervention to protect the rights of farm workers;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3 c. Notes that the CAP Rural Development Programmes can be employed to foster the inclusion of migrants and refugees in rural areas with rights-based policies concerning services, housing, transport, health, infrastructure and economic diversification, all of which can spur rural development;
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Points out that labour inspections on farms should be proportional and not hamper the normal development of the farm's activity;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 d (new) Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that family workers still represent the vast majority of agricultural labour in Europe, and that insufficient generational renewal is one of the major challenges faced by the farming sector across the EU, resulting in fewer farmers in the sector year after year; Notes that CAP measures oriented towards young farmer help maintain employment in agriculture, namely through supporting farm succession and generating local jobs in both farming and its up-and downstream sectors. However, regrets that this positive trend remains very limited in its impact because of many other economic factors influencing farming employment, such as access to credit and land as well as lack in succession planning and lack of tax incentives;
Amendment 6 #
- having regard to the Communication of the European Commission of 23 March 2020 on the implementation of the Green Lanes under the Guidelines for border management measures to protect health and ensure the availability of goods and essential services,
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that family workers still
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that family workers still represent the vast majority of agricultural labour in Europe, and that insufficient generational renewal is one of the major challenges faced by the farming sector across the EU, resulting in fewer farmers in the sector year after year; it is therefore necessary to support the next generation of family farmers as well as new young farmers, as this support is integrated in the CAP;
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that family workers still represent the vast majority of agricultural labour in Europe, and that insufficient generational renewal, aggravated by the lack of profitability of many agricultural holdings, which makes this activity unattractive for the incorporation of young people, is one of the major challenges faced by the farming sector across the EU, resulting in fewer farmers in the sector year after year;
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that family workers still represent the vast majority of agricultural labour in Europe, and that insufficient generational renewal is one of the major challenges faced by the farming sector across the EU, resulting, among other factors such as the lack of services in rural areas, in fewer farmers in the sector year after year;
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that family workers still represent the vast majority of agricultural labour in Europe, and that insufficient generational renewal
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that family workers
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Emphasises that matching up skills and qualifications with job opportunities in the agricultural sector is a precondition for the establishment of a competitive labour market in the European Union; emphasises that the diversification of tasks means there is an increasing demand for qualified people in the agricultural sector; calls on the Member States to bring training in the agricultural sector into line with the sector’s labour market needs and to promote lifelong learning as a way of addressing the shortfall in workers;
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Stresses the necessity to guarantee agri-food supply chains and food security, especially during the current COVID-19 crisis; notes that seasonal workers are crucial to the smooth and proper functioning of the agricultural sectors, in particular for the fruit, vegetable and wine sectors; points out that it is fundamental to protect and guarantee the rights, health and safety of workers in the agri-food sectors, especially during the current COVID-19 crisis;
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Considers that seasonal workers play an important role in agricultural sector, therefore it is of utmost importance to guarantee their rights in the field of working conditions ensuring the same level of protection that applies to domestic workers, furthermore to safeguard that social security rights are provided by the Member State of employment in accordance with the lex loci laboris principle;
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Takes the view that the complete lack of a fair wage, which has long been the case and is directly linked with European and international market legislation, is one of the major causes of the problems with regard to generational renewal and maintaining the attractiveness of farming;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Citation 2 a (new) - having regard to the European Parliament Resolution of 19 June 2020 on European protection of cross-border and seasonal workers in the context of the COVID-19crisis (2020/2664(RSP)),
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Points out that the shortage of labour supply makes EU farmers and food producers increasingly dependent on hired and seasonal labour with a large part of the seasonal EU agri-workforce predominantly coming from economically vulnerable social groups from Central and Eastern Europe;
Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Stresses the importance of ensuring that rural areas are equipped with the necessary basic public service facilities in order to enable a proper and permanent incorporation of women into any labour activity in these territories;
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Considers that 10 million people are, in addition to landowners and their families, employed in the European agricultural sector, constituting an important part of the rural population;
Amendment 73 #
4a. Considers that targeted support for triple-track cooperation in the agricultural sector, encompassing research and entrepreneurship, can produce significant results.
Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Considers that the labour shortage and skills gap is one of the main problems facing farms in the south of Europe;
Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Points out that technical and higher education in agriculture plays a key role in shaping the European area of education and research; emphasises how important it is to enable the agriculture professionals of the future to access the ERASMUS+ European mobility programme in order to give them the opportunity to acquire new know-how and improve their skills, while also ensuring the recognition of qualifications at EU level;
Amendment 76 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Regrets that COVID-19 exacerbated the occupational risks to the safety and health of seasonal workers, leading to further spread of infection and disease clusters; encourages in this regard the Member States to make full use of the recently adopted Guidelines on seasonal workers in the EU in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak to better guarantee their rights, health and safety;
Amendment 77 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Points out the need for a holistic European Migration Code, which addresses the vulnerabilities migrant workers face, reduces inequalities, ensures decent working conditions for all workers, and allows migrants to play an active role in rural societies;
Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Points out that technological innovation is a driver of structural change within farms and agricultural labour markets, and that many holdings across Europe are not sufficiently prepared for taking up technological innovation owing to the low level of agricultural training of their farm managers, a level which differs significantly among Member States; notes that that the current trend towards a technology-oriented agricultural sector has the potential to push labour costs upwards, as farming will demand a higher-skilled labour force; highlights that increased training, education and upskilling will be required by all workers in the sector to meet the challenge of increased technologic innovation and modernisation and notes that this increased training should be planned in close collaboration with social partners within the labour market;
Amendment 79 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Points out that technological innovation is a driver of structural change within farms and agricultural labour markets, and that many holdings across Europe are not sufficiently prepared for taking up technological innovation owing
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Citation 2 a (new) - having regard to the Motion for Resolution on European protection of cross-border and seasonal workers in the context of the COVID-19 crisis (2020/2664(RSP)),
Amendment 80 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Points out that technological innovation
Amendment 81 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Points out that technological innovation is a driver of structural change within farms and agricultural labour markets, and that many holdings across Europe are not sufficiently prepared for taking up technological innovation owing to the low level of agricultural training of their farm managers, a level which differs significantly among Member States and insists that Farm Advisory Services shall have an important role for providing technological and scientific information to farmers and increase the access to innovation;
Amendment 82 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Points out that technological innovation is
Amendment 83 #
5. Points out that technological innovation is a driver of structural change within farms and agricultural labour markets, and that many holdings across Europe are not sufficiently prepared for taking up technological innovation
Amendment 84 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Points out that technological innovation and digital technology is a driver of structural change within farms and agricultural labour markets, and that many holdings across Europe are not sufficiently prepared for taking up technological innovation owing to the low level of agricultural training of their farm managers, a level which differs significantly among Member States;
Amendment 85 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Points out that technological innovation is a driver of structural change within farms and agricultural labour markets, and that many holdings across Europe
Amendment 86 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Underlines that the new CAP should have a social dimension and a conditionality on social and labour requirements and standards, protecting the rights, wages and social security of all workers, including seasonal ones who are the most vulnerable on the market;
Amendment 87 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 88 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers that, in order to create quality employment, farms and livestock holdings must be profitable and not sell below production costs;
Amendment 89 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Considers that certain regional support systems for part-time workers incentivise the shadow economy and informal employment;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Citation 2 b (new) - having regard to the Communication of the European Commission of 30 March 2020 ‘Guidelines concerning the exercise of the free movement of workers during COVID- 19 outbreak’,
Amendment 90 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Recalls that maintaining farming employment plays a key role in keeping rural economies alive and i
Amendment 91 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Recalls that maintaining farming employment
Amendment 92 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Recalls that maintaining farming employment plays a key role in
Amendment 93 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Emphasises the need to make it easier for seasonal workers to move around, in particular in border areas, because European farms are reliant on such workers for their survival, as the COVID-19 crisis has shown;
Amendment 94 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Emphasises that it is crucial to counter any unfair intra-EU competition that hampers the smooth functioning of the single market; emphasises, in this regard, how important the role of the European Labour Authority will be in combating fraud and other irregularities;
Amendment 95 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 96 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 97 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Emphasises that, in its trade policy, the EU must ensure there is no unfair competition on the part of non-EU countries by guaranteeing that products entering the EU comply with our working conditions and labour standards;
Amendment 98 #
7a. Considers that European assistance should only be granted to beneficiaries who comply with social standards and who do not foster illegal, unregulated and/or undeclared work practices, either for temporary or for permanent workers.
Amendment 99 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Considers it vital to make progress on these issues in the European Union, to adopt measures at European level as a European minimum wage that can protect all workers, regardless of where they come from;
source: 650.469
2020/10/30
IMCO
86 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas the Professional Qualifications Directive (PQD)
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Recital A b (new) Ab. whereas the Services Directive, the Professional Qualifications Directive and the Proportionality Test Directive laid down the provisions that ensure the proper functioning of the internal market, while guaranteeing a high level of workers and consumer protection;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Recital A c (new) Ac. whereas different regulatory choices at both the European and national level, imperfect and inadequate transposition of relevant directives, excessive requirements, lack of clear rules and fragmentation create the obstacles to fully benefit from the free movement of workers and services;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Recital A c (new) Ac. whereas a single market with high social and environmental standards, quality services and fair competition serves the interests of all stakeholders;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Recital A d (new) Ad. whereas in March 2020 the Commission has issued the Guidelines concerning the exercise of the free movement of workers during COVID-19 outbreak, which sets out the principles for an integrated approach to effective internal borders management to protect public health while preserving the integrity of the internal market;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Recital A d (new) Ad. whereas the economic recovery from the crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has to be in accordance with the guidelines set out by the European Green Deal and not at the expense of social or workers’ rights;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Recital A e (new) Ae. whereas the Council has adopted a recommendation on a coordinated approach to the restrictions of free movement in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which aims at increasing the transparency and predictability of free movement across the EU for both citizens and enterprises;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Highlights that, in the present health crisis, free movement of workers, not only in the field of health services, clearly demonstrates the benefits of
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Highlights that, in the present health crisis, free movement of workers in the field of health services clearly demonstrates the benefits of the PQD
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Highlights that, in the present health crisis, free movement of workers in the field of health services clearly demonstrates the benefits of the PQD; recalls that the aim of PQD is to facilitate the professionals to provide their services across Europe whilst guaranteeing an improved level of protection for consumers and citizens, which is particularly important during the pandemic crisis,
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Highlights that, in the present health crisis, free movement of workers in the field of health services clearly demonstrates the benefits of the PQD; whereas at the same time the current crisis has shed light on and exacerbated existing short-comings in the protection of posted workers in the framework of the provision of services;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the Professional Qualifications Directive facilitates the intra-EU labour mobility and the Services Directive realises the free movement of services, but the full potential of the single market for services and professionals can still be further improved and developed and the barriers for the free movement of services and professionals removed;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Highlights that, in the present health crisis, free movement of workers in the field of health services clearly demonstrates the benefits of the PQD, while also pointing to the shortcomings of these arrangements;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. underlines the great importance of free movement of workers and services in overcoming the recession and increased unemployment rates caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, reiterates that further removal of the existing barriers within the single market is essential in order to fully benefit from its potential; regrets that the Recovery Plan proposed by the Commission lacks ambition when it comes to the movement of workers and services and fails to fully recognise its importance as a tool for economic recovery;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that the latest decisions on travel restrictions crisis by certain Member States due to COVID19 have created uncertainty for both citizens and businesses, especially cross-border workers; calls therefore the Commission and Member States for coordination of such measures to prepare for future waves and ensure safe mobility for workers;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses the need to guarantee the comprehensive and efficient application of EU rules on the free movement of workers and services in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in order to protect both businesses and consumers, and stimulate innovation and competitiveness under fair and balanced conditions, upholding the principles of the Single Market;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Underlines, that uninterrupted mobility of health professionals and carers should be ensured where possible, in view of the COVID-19 pandemic as well as future demographic challenges;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Welcomes the Commission’s legislative proposal on minimum wages that can underpin the EU single market, especially in the services sector, and allow for a level-playing field;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Regrets that insufficient national implementation of existing legislation continues to seriously hamper the free mobility of workers and the effective protection of their rights within the EU to the detriment of workers and the European economy as a whole; stresses however that the free movement of workers has to be a choice rather than the outcome of economic pressure;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Regrets that in
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the free movement of workers is a fundamental principle of the European Union, a right for all citizens and essential to the proper functioning of the internal market; whereas labour mobility should not only be free but also fair and underlined with solid rights so as to create a true level playing field;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Regrets that insufficient national implementation of existing legislation continues to seriously hamper the free mobility of workers within the EU to the detriment of workers and the European economy as a whole; urges the Members States to refrain from gold-plating the legislation in order to safeguard their markets from fair competition; points at lack of harmonised interpretation of EU law by the Member States such as the recently revised Posting of Workers Directive 2018/957/EU, which leads to lack of legal clarity and bureaucratic burdens for companies providing services in various Member States;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Regrets that insufficient national implementation of existing legislation continues to seriously hamper the free mobility of workers within the EU to the detriment of workers and the European economy as a whole, pointing out that workers in the same job and with the same responsibilities are being treated differently;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Regrets that insufficient national implementation of existing legislation continues to seriously hamper the free mobility of workers within the EU to the detriment of workers and the European economy as a whole and calls on the European Commission to open infringement procedures whenever necessary;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Regrets the fact that workers who move within the EU and are covered by the rules on social security coordination face significant administrative burdens and issues such as uncertainty regarding their contributions and entitlements, and lack of exchange of data and lack of coordination between institutions, which affect the free mobility of workers; calls on Member States to enhance administrative cooperation between the competent authorities and on the Commission to foster and support such cooperation; further calls for a revision and modernization of the rules on social security coordination;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Regrets insufficient access to information with regards to mobility of services; underlines that information available on single official national websites is often provided in few languages only and limited in scope; underlines, that access to information on domestic collective agreements is especially difficult; calls on the relevant European and national authorities to take appropriate steps aimed at establishing a single template for single official national websites and to make them compatible with SDG to ease access to relevant information between different Members States;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Regrets that the European Commission is not using the full potential of initiatives such as the European Professional Card as foreseen in the PQD; calls therefore upon the European Commission to extend the European Professional Card to more professions as it offers an advantageous option for professionals who wish to work either temporarily or permanently in another Member State;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Recalls that regulated professions represent up to 22 % of the labour force in the EU and cover many crucial sectors, such as health and social services, business services, construction, network services, transport, tourism, real estate, public services and education.1a __________________ 1a A8-0401/2017.
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that while it is a competence of Member States to regulate a certain profession, they must respect the limits of the principles of non- discrimination on grounds of gender, religion, race, ethnicity and age, and proportionality, as explicitly stipulated in the Proportionality Test Directive;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas different regulatory choices at both the European and national level, imperfect and inadequate transposition of relevant directives, excessive requirements, lack of clear rules and fragmentation create the obstacles to fully benefit from the free movement of workers and services;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that while it is a competence of Member States to regulate a certain profession, they must respect the limits of the principles of non- discrimination and proportionality, as explicitly stipulated in the Proportionality Test Directive; calls on the Commission to provide structured assistance and issue guidance to Member States on how to conduct ex-ante proportionality assessments of new national regulation of services according to the Proportionality Test Directive;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that while it is a competence of Member States to regulate a certain profession, they must respect the limits of the principles of non- discrimination and proportionality, as
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that while it is a competence of Member States to regulate a certain profession, they must respect the limits of the principles of non- discrimination and proportionality, as explicitly stipulated in the Proportionality Test Directive; regrets that the assessment of proportionality is rarely carried out; calls on the Commission to define the concept of proportionality more precisely and to provide Member States with practical guidelines for its application;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that while it is a competence of Member States to regulate a certain profession, they must respect the
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Member States to reduce bureaucratic obstacles, and, as quickly as possible, make it possible to obtain electronically the documents needed for the cross-border provision of services as well as facilitate the cross- border activities of workers in regulated professions;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Underlines that while certain aspects remain the competence of Member States, it is the Union’s responsibility to tackle social dumping and practices that could have negative consequences on workers' social security;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Takes into consideration that the harmonisation inspired by the Professional Qualifications Directive gained success within several professions; further proclaims that Member States should reconsider and coordinate rules governing entry and exercise requirements in relation to specific activities or professions;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Takes into consideration that the harmonisation inspired by the Professional Qualifications Directive gained success within several professions; further proclaims that Member States should reconsider and coordinate rules governing entry and exercise requirements in relation to specific activities or professions;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas mutual recognition of skills and qualifications is key to support mobility, long-life learning and career opportunities for all across the EU, including people with disabilities, thereby contributing to the free movement of services in the Single Market;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Condemns the practices of some corporations exploiting the fact that certain Member States have lower average salaries, as wages are a key component of working conditions;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Stresses, that, according to the Single Market Scoreboard 2020, further improvements are needed to ensure the free movement of professionals, especially in the field of recognising professional qualifications;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Stresses, that, according to the Single Market Scoreboard 2020, further improvements are needed to ensure the free movement of professionals, especially in the field of recognising professional qualifications;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that the Services Directive builds on the country of destination principle and aims to ensure the provision of high-quality services and therefore Member States shall not be prevented from imposing necessary requirements with regard to the provision of a service activity and the PQD builds on the principle of mutual recognition to facilitate free movement of
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that the
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that the Services Directive and the PQD build on the principle of
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that the Services Directive and the PQD build on the principle of
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that the Services Directive and the PQD build on the principle of mutual recognition to facilitate free movement of services; calls on the Member States to extend mutual recognition to more levels of education and
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that the Services Directive and the PQD build on the principle of mutual recognition to facilitate free movement of services; calls on the Member States to extend mutual recognition to more levels of education and training, and to improve or introduce the necessary procedures as soon as possible;
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that the Services Directive and the PQD build on the principle of mutual recognition to facilitate free movement of services; calls on the Member States to extend mutual recognition to more levels of education and to improve or introduce the necessary procedures as soon as possible; further calls on Member States to coordinate and harmonize the recognition of qualifications completed outside the EU so that these qualifications enjoy comparable recognition everywhere within the single market;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the European Professional Card enhances safe professional mobility and creates a framework for a simpler, faster and more transparent recognition of the qualifications;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that the Services Directive and the PQD build on the principle of mutual recognition to facilitate free movement of services; calls on the Member States to extend mutual recognition to more levels of education and to improve or introduce the necessary procedures as soon as possible; recalls that the country of destination principle was not included in the Services Directive;
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to strengthen cooperation with Member States and increase enforcement efforts, not just regarding the legislation on free movement, but also regarding working conditions and the protection of workers’ health and safety, in line with the European Pillar of Social Rights;
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Encourages the Commission to fully enforce existing rules and to make quick decisions on complaints to ensure that relevant issues from an end-user perspective are promptly handled and efficiently settled; calls for alternative resolution mechanisms to be assessed and for infringement procedures to be applied swiftly and rigorously whenever breaches of relevant legislation are identified or disproportionate burdens introduced;
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Encourages the Commission to fully enforce existing rules; calls for alternative resolution mechanisms to be assessed and for infringement procedures to be applied
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Encourages the Commission to
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Encourages the Commission to fully and effectively enforce existing rules; calls for alternative resolution mechanisms to be assessed and for infringement procedures to be applied swiftly and rigorously whenever breaches of relevant legislation are identified or disproportionate burdens introduced;
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes that mobility of labour and services complexity increased in the recent years due to number of new European and national rules; calls on the Commission to regularly screen the Internal Market for administrative burdens and to lift them; asks the Commission and the Members States to devote additional resources to improve the functioning of the SOLVIT system as a way for a swift resolution of administrative problems in the Member States;
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Encourages Member States to work together in order to guarantee the continuity of work of cross-border workers during the pandemic crisis, taking into account their specific situation and in order to preserve the free movement of services and workers in regulated professions within the internal market;
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Encourages Member States to work together in order to guarantee the continuity of work of cross-border workers during the pandemic crisis, taking into account their specific situation and in order to preserve the free movement of services and workers in regulated professions within the internal market;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the free movement of workers and services are essential for a well-functioning single market;
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Welcomes the announcement of the Commission in its´ 2021 Work Programme1a to withdraw the e-card proposals1b; regrets that the proposal on Services Notification Procedure1c could not be adopted due to the lack of an agreement in Council; __________________ 1a COM(2020) 690 final. 1bCOM(2016)823 final 2016/0402 (COD) and COM(2016)824 final 2016/0403 (COD). 1c COM(2016)821 final 2016/0398 (COD).
Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Reiterates that Member States should follow the Council Recommendation on a coordinated approach to the restriction of free movement in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, adopted on 13th October 2020 in order to avoid any disruption in the internal market and free movement of workers and services;
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to improve tools such as the Points of Single Contact and the Single Digital Gateway and on the Member States to
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to improve tools such as the Points of Single Contact and the Single Digital Gateway where appropriate, to provide guidelines to help Member States streamline procedures, in particular for SMEs; calls and on the Member States to use such tools to provide workers, consumers and businesses with prompt, accurate and easily accessible information regarding their rights and obligations related to free movement within the single market.
Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to improve tools such as the Points of Single Contact and the Single Digital Gateway and on the Member States to use such tools to provide workers, consumers and businesses with accurate and easily accessible information regarding their rights and obligations related to free movement within the single market
Amendment 76 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to improve tools such as the Points of Single Contact and the Single Digital Gateway and on the Member States to use such tools to provide workers, consumers and businesses with accurate and easily accessible information regarding their rights and obligations related to free movement within the single market
Amendment 77 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 – point 1 (new) (1) Urges the Commission to take action against the so-called letterbox companies, which are artificially set up to circumvent applicable legislation in a host country, while clearly abusing the freedom of establishment;
Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Recalls that cross-border health care services fall within the ambit of freedom to provide services as stated by the Court of Justice of the EU; notes that Cross-border Health Care Directive was adopted also on basis of Article 114 TFEU; regrets that Cross-border Health Care Directive creates additional obstacles to provision of cross-border health care services when compared to the case-law of the Court of Justice applying the Treaty provisions on free movement of services; underlines the necessity that these additional obstacles are removed, underlines that a better coordination and promotion of best practices between Member States and cross-border mobility of health professionals are beneficial and particularly important during the COVID- 19 pandemic;
Amendment 79 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Recalls that cross-border health care services fall within the ambit of freedom to provide services as stated by the Court of Justice of the EU; notes that Cross-border Health Care Directive was adopted also on basis of Article 114 TFEU; regrets that Cross-border Health Care Directive creates additional obstacles to provision of cross-border health care services when compared to the case-law of the Court of Justice applying the Treaty provisions on free movement of services; underlines the necessity that these additional obstacles are removed, underlines that a better coordination and promotion of best practices between Member States and cross-border mobility of health professionals are beneficial and particularly important during the COVID- 19 pandemic;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Recital A b (new) Ab. whereas the COVID-19 crisis has caused an unprecedented economic crisis, and unlocking the full potential of the single market as well as enhancing the free movement of workers and services by making full use of the mutual recognition of professional qualifications and freedom to provide services under the Services Directive can facilitate the recovery process and put the economy back on track after the crisis;
Amendment 80 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Emphasises that due to the growing volume of labour and services’ mobility, digitalisation is a must; is of the opinion that the digital tools designed to facilitate mobility of labour and services as well as an exchange of the information between the different social security systems, such as digital A1Portable Document form, will improve workers’ protection, reduce administrative burdens and improve Member States cooperation;
Amendment 81 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that all relevant procedures to access the services market in another Member State are efficiently coordinated and that service providers are properly informed, in order to ensure compliance with applicable national rules, including proportionate employment terms and conditions that Member States apply in accordance with Union law;
Amendment 82 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls therefore for greater promotion, application and enforcement of the European Qualifications Framework to guarantee a widely used recognition instrument throughout the European Union;
Amendment 83 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Considers that, in order to ensure the smooth functioning of the internal market and the timely provision of services, it is necessary to remove barriers to the free movement of workers within the EU;
Amendment 84 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Urges the Commission to introduce a European social security number in order to promote fair working conditions, and thus realizing the principle of equal pay for equal work at the same place;
Amendment 85 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Supports the Commission's Communication on "Long term action plan for better implementation and enforcement of Single Market rules" especially the proposals to: reinforce SOLVIT as a tool for Single Market dispute resolution, increase the Commission activity and support to the Member States as they transpose the EU law to ensure correct and harmonised interpretation across the Internal Market, create a Single Market obstacles tool under the Single Digital Gateway, allowing citizens and businesses to report anonymously on regulatory obstacles encountered by them while exercising their internal market rights; highlights further that the Commission should act decisively to mitigate discovered obstacles, as in the past identifying issues itself frequently led to little few achievements;
Amendment 86 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Calls on the Member States, to implement the updated Commission Guidelines concerning the exercise of the free movement of workers during COVID- 19 outbreak in order to allow workers, in particular transport, frontier, posted and seasonal workers, and service providers to cross borders and have access to their place of work, unless imposed restrictions are dully justified; calls on the Commission to actively collect and present in a comprehensive way all relevant information including sanitary obligations and restrictions present in various Member States;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Recital A b (new) Ab. whereas the Council has adopted a recommendation on a coordinated approach to the restrictions of free movement in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which aims at increasing the transparency and predictability of free movement across the EU for both citizens and enterprises;
source: 658.913
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6/summary |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed |
events/4 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0/title |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting dateNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
forecasts/1 |
|
commission |
|
events/0/body |
EP
|
events/2/body |
EP
|
events/3/body |
EP
|
forecasts/0/date |
Old
2021-04-26T00:00:00New
2021-05-17T00:00:00 |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.195New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-PR-660195_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.630&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AD-648630_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE662.032New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AM-662032_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE657.157&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-657157_EN.html |
docs/4 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
forecasts/0/title |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Indicative plenary sitting date |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/2/date |
Old
2021-03-18T00:00:00New
2021-03-25T00:00:00 |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE657.157New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE657.157&secondRef=02 |
events/2 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.630New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.630&secondRef=02 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE657.157&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE657.157 |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
96709
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.630&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.630 |
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
forecasts/0/date |
Old
2021-02-23T00:00:00New
2021-03-17T00:00:00 |
forecasts/1 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
96709
|
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
119431
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.195
|
docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
forecasts |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
EMPL/9/01672
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
EMPL/9/02246
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|