BETA

9 Amendments of Sebastian Valentin BODU related to 2013/2114(INI)

Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital N
N. whereas in the case of online music sales, licence-granting practices are being viewed as an alternative tosupplemented by the system of private copying levies;
2013/10/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that the private copying system is a virtuous system that balances the rightexception to copying for private use with fair remuneration to rightholders, and that it is a system worth preserving;
2013/10/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Takes the view that consumers must be informed of the amount and the purpose of the levy paid by them; urges the Commission and Member States accordingly, in consultation with manufacturers, importers, retailers and consumer associations, to ensure that this information is indicated on packaging and, as far as possible, on invoices and receipts issued to consumers;
2013/10/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Calls on the Member States to earmark at least 25% of revenue from private copying levies to promote the creative and performance arts and their production;
2013/10/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls for the elimination of technical protection measures causing an imbalance between freedom to copy and fair remuneration for rightholders under private copying arrangements;deleted
2013/10/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Points out that the implementation of exclusive rights does not guarantee all rightholders, and in particular performance artists, a fair and proportional share of revenue arising from the use of their works;deleted
2013/10/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Observes that, despite permanent access to online works, downloading, storage and private copying for offline use is continuing; takes the view that a private copying levy system cannot therefore be replaced by aupplements the licencing system;
2013/10/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Stresses that, as for online services, contractual authorisations cannot be allowed to prevail to the detriment ofare supplemented by private copying exception arrangements;
2013/10/21
Committee: JURI
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Calls on the Commission and Member States to examine the possibility of legalising works sharing for non- commercial purposes so as to guarantee consumers access to a wide variety of content and real choice in terms of cultural diversity;deleted
2013/10/21
Committee: JURI