Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | JURI | CASTEX Françoise ( S&D) | WIKSTRÖM Cecilia ( ALDE) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 252 votes to 122, with 19 abstentions, a resolution on private copying levies.
Digital private copying has taken on major economic importance as a result of technological progress and the shift to the internet and cloud computing. Authors’ claim to protection of their creative work, and their right to equitable remuneration for that work must also exist in the digital age. The cultural sector provides 5 million jobs in the EU and 2.6% of its GDP and is one of the main drivers of growth in Europe.
Modernised and harmonised system : copyright law should balance the interests of creators and consumers . All European consumers should have the right to make private copies of legally acquired content.
The resolution emphasised that the current fragmented copyright regime needs to be reformed in order to facilitate access to, and increase (global) circulation of, cultural and creative content, in such a way as to enable artists, creators, consumers, businesses and audiences to benefit from digital developments, new distribution channels, new business models and other opportunities, especially in times of budget austerity.
Parliament stated that the private copying system is a virtuous system that balances the exception for copying for private use with the right to fair remuneration for rightholders , and that it is worth preserving. It considered that there is no alternative to this balanced system in the short term. They stressed, however, that discussions need to be held in the long term with a view to continually assessing the private copying system in the light of digital and market developments and consumer behaviour and, if possible, exploring potential alternatives that would fulfil the objective of striking a balance between the exception for copying by consumers and the compensation of creators.
The resolution emphasised that the major disparities between national systems for the collection of levies, especially as regards the types of product subject to the levy and the rates of levy, can distort competition and give rise to ‘ forum shopping ’ within the internal market.
The Member States and the Commission are invited to conduct a study on the essential elements of private copying, in particular a common definition, the concept of ‘fair compensation’ – which at present is not explicitly regulated by Directive 2001/29/EC – and the concept of ‘harm’ to an author resulting from unauthorised reproduction of a rightholder’s work for private use. The Commission is called upon to look for common ground as regards which products should be subject to the levy and to establish common criteria for the negotiating arrangement for the rates applicable to private copying, with a view to enforcing a system that is transparent, equitable and uniform for consumers and creators.
Single collection procedure, reimbursements and clearer consumer information : Parliament stressed that the concept of private copies should be clearly defined for all materials and that the user should be able to access copyright content on all media on the basis of a single payment . It called for arrangements already in force in Member States, such as exceptions and levy exemptions, to be respected and for it to be possible for them to apply in parallel on the market. Members stated that private copying levies should be payable by manufacturers or importers . In the case of cross-border transactions, private copying levies should be collected in the Member State in which the end user having purchased the product resides. Member States in which levies are currently charged or collected should simplify and harmonise their levy rates. The resolution stressed the need to make clear to consumers the role of the private copying system with regard to remuneration of artists and cultural dissemination. Consumers must be informed of the amount, purpose and use of the levy they pay. In this respect, the Commission and the Member States are urged, in consultation with manufacturers, importers, retailers and consumer associations, to ensure that this information is clearly available to consumers.
Member States are urged to adopt transparent exemption rules for professional uses . Parliament called on the Member States to ensure that private copy levies never have to be paid where the media in question are used for professional purposes, and that various arrangements for the reimbursement of levies paid for professional users are replaced with systems which guarantee that these users are not liable to pay the levy in the first place.
Transparency regarding allocation of revenue : Member States are urged to ensure greater transparency regarding the allocation of proceeds from private copying levies. They should earmark at least 25 % of revenue from private copying levies to promote the creative and performance arts and their production and publish reports on the allocation of proceeds in open source format with interpretable data.
Technical protection measures : Parliament considered that it is necessary to authorise the deployment of technical protection measures in order to restore the balance between freedom to make copies for private use and exclusive copying rights. These protection measures should not prevent consumers from making copies or rightholders from being fairly remunerated for private copying.
Licences : Members noted that, despite some streaming access to works, downloading, storage and private copying continue. However, They took the view that a private copying levy system is therefore still relevant in the online environment and that preference should always be given to licensing models benefiting all rightholders if no copies of the copyright work are permitted on media and devices. Private copying exception arrangements should apply to certain online services, including certain cloud computing services.
The Committee on Legal Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Françoise CASTEX (S&D, FR) on private copying levies.
Digital private copying has taken on major economic importance as a result of technological progress and the shift to the internet and cloud computing. Authors’ claim to protection of their creative work, and their right to equitable remuneration for that work must also exist in the digital age.
Modernised and harmonised system : the Commission is called upon to present a legislative proposal to review Directive 2001/29/EC on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, including a provision on the full harmonisation of exceptions and limitations, inter alia with regard to private copying. Members emphasised that the current fragmented copyright regime needs to be reformed in order to facilitate access to, and increase (global) circulation of, cultural and creative content, in such a way as to enable artists, creators, consumers, businesses and audiences to benefit from digital developments, new distribution channels, new business models and other opportunities, especially in times of budget austerity.
Members stated that the private copying system is a virtuous system that balances the exception for copying for private use with the right to fair remuneration for rightholders , and that it is worth preserving, especially in cases where rightholders are not in a position to license directly the right of reproduction on multiple devices. They considered that there is no alternative to this balanced system in the short term. They stressed, however, that discussions need to be held in the long term with a view to continually assessing the private copying system in the light of digital and market developments and consumer behaviour and, if possible, exploring potential alternatives that would fulfil the objective of striking a balance between the exception for copying by consumers and the compensation of creators.
The report emphasised that the major disparities between national systems for the collection of levies, especially as regards the types of product subject to the levy and the rates of levy, can distort competition and give rise to ‘ forum shopping ’ within the internal market.
The Member States and the Commission are invited to conduct a study on the essential elements of private copying, in particular a common definition, the concept of ‘fair compensation’ – which at present is not explicitly regulated by Directive 2001/29/EC – and the concept of ‘harm’ to an author resulting from unauthorised reproduction of a rightholder’s work for private use. The Commission is called upon to look for common ground as regards which products should be subject to the levy and to establish common criteria for the negotiating arrangement for the rates applicable to private copying, with a view to enforcing a system that is transparent, equitable and uniform for consumers and creators.
Single collection procedure, reimbursements and clearer consumer information : the report stressed that the concept of private copies should be clearly defined for all materials and that the user should be able to access copyright content on all media on the basis of a single payment . It called for arrangements already in force in Member States, such as exceptions and levy exemptions, to be respected and for it to be possible for them to apply in parallel on the market. Members stated that private copying levies should be payable by manufacturers or importers . In the case of cross-border transactions, private copying levies should be collected in the Member State in which the end user having purchased the product resides. Member States in which levies are currently charged or collected should simplify and harmonise their levy rates. The report stressed the need to make clear to consumers the role of the private copying system with regard to remuneration of artists and cultural dissemination. Consumers must be informed of the amount, purpose and use of the levy they pay. In this respect, the Commission and the Member States are urged, in consultation with manufacturers, importers, retailers and consumer associations, to ensure that this information is clearly available to consumers.
Member States are urged to adopt transparent exemption rules for professional uses in order to ensure that they are exempt, including in practice, from private copy levies. The committee called on the Member States to ensure that private copy levies never have to be paid where the media in question are used for professional purposes, and that various arrangements for the reimbursement of levies paid for professional users are replaced with systems which guarantee that these users are not liable to pay the levy in the first place.
Transparency regarding allocation of revenue : Member States are urged to ensure greater transparency regarding the allocation of proceeds from private copying levies. They should earmark at least 25 % of revenue from private copying levies to promote the creative and performance arts and their production and publish reports on the allocation of proceeds in open source format with interpretable data.
Technical protection measures : Members considered that it is necessary to authorise the deployment of technical protection measures in order to restore the balance between freedom to make copies for private use and exclusive copying rights. These protection measures should not prevent consumers from making copies or rightholders from being fairly remunerated for private copying.
Licences : Members noted that, despite some streaming access to works, downloading, storage and private copying continue. They took the view that a private copying levy system is therefore still relevant in the online environment and that preference should always be given to licensing models benefiting all rightholders if no copies of the copyright work are permitted on media and devices. Private copying exception arrangements should apply to certain online services, including certain cloud computing services.
The Commission presents a communication on content in the Digital Single Market.
In 2010, in its Digital Agenda for Europe , the Commission endeavoured to open up access to content as part of its strategy to achieve a vibrant Digital Single Market and identified a number of actions in the field of copyright. In 2011, in its Intellectual Property Strategy " A Single Market for Intellectual Property Rights ", the Commission recognised the strategic importance of copyright for the development of the Digital Single Market.
In the Compact for Growth and Jobs in June 2012 , the Heads of State or Government underlined, among other measures needed to achieve a well-functioning Digital Single Market by 2015, the importance of modernising Europe's copyright regime and facilitating licensing, while ensuring a high level of protection of intellectual property rights and taking into account cultural diversity.
Whilst good progress has been made in delivering the copyright-related actions identified in the Digital Agenda and the Intellectual Property Strategy, there remains work to be done to ensure an effective single market in the area of copyright .
The Commission will therefore work on two parallel tracks of action.
1. Structured stakeholder dialogue : a structured stakeholder dialogue will be launched by the Commission, with the assigned objective of delivering by the end of 2013 practical industry-led solutions to these issues , without prejudice to further public policy action, including legislative reform, as appropriate. Under the name of " Licensing Europe ", this process will seek to tap the potential and explore the possible limits of innovative licensing and technological solutions in making EU copyright law and practice fit for the digital age.
"Licensing Europe" will comprise four parallel work strands , tasked with delivering effective market-led solutions. The process will cover the following issues:
Cross-border access and the portability of services : the Commission's objective is to foster cross-border on-line access and "portability" across borders of content. It also concerns cross-border legal access to cloud-stored content and services which should also be facilitated. User-generated content and licensing for small-scale users of protected material : the Commission's objective is to foster transparency and ensure that end-users have greater clarity on legitimate and non-legitimate uses of protected material, and easier access to legitimate solutions. Audiovisual sector and cultural heritage institutions : the Commission's objective is to facilitate the deposit and online accessibility of films in the EU both for commercial purposes and non-commercial cultural and educational uses. Text and data mining : the Commission's objective is to promote the efficient use of text and data mining (TDM) for scientific research purposes. In addition to these areas, during 2012 the issue of private copying levies has been the subject of an industry mediation process, fostered by the Commission and led by former Commissioner António Vitorino. Mr. Vitorino is expected to deliver a report on this issue at the beginning of next year, including a number of recommendations.
2. Review of the copyright framework : in parallel the Commission will complete its on-going review of the EU copyright framework , based on market studies and impact assessment and legal drafting work, with a view to a decision in 2014 whether to table the resulting legislative reform proposals. The following elements will be addressed:
territoriality in the Internal Market; harmonisation, limitations and exceptions to copyright in the digital age; fragmentation of the EU copyright market; how to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of enforcement while underpinning its legitimacy in the wider context of copyright reform.
Lastly, over the next two years, the Commission will continue to : (i) work for a modern copyright framework that remains fit for purpose and seeks to foster innovative market practices in order to guarantee effective recognition and remuneration of rights holders; (ii) provide sustainable incentives for creativity, cultural diversity and innovation; (iii) increase the choice of and open up access to legal offers by end users; (iv) allow new business models to emerge; (v) more effectively contribute to combating illegal offers and piracy.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)447
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0179/2014
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0114/2014
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE521.789
- Committee draft report: PE519.560
- For information: COM(2012)0789
- For information: EUR-Lex
- For information: COM(2012)0789 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE519.560
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE521.789
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)447
Activities
- Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Private copying levies (short presentation)
- 2016/11/22 Private copying levies (short presentation)
- Françoise CASTEX
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Private copying levies (short presentation)
- Christian ENGSTRÖM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Private copying levies (short presentation)
- Antonio MASIP HIDALGO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Private copying levies (short presentation)
- Jacek PROTASIEWICZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zbigniew ZALESKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Private copying levies (short presentation)
Amendments | Dossier |
190 |
2013/2114(INI)
2013/10/21
JURI
190 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 – having regard to the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union, particularly in cases C-467/08, Padawan v SGAE, of 21 October 2010, C-462/09, Stichting de Thuiskopie v Opus Supplies Deutschland GmbH and others, of 16 June 2011, C-457/11 – C-460/11, VG Wort v Kyocera Mita and others, of 27 June 2013, and C-521/11, Austro Mechana v Amazon, of 11 July 2013,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas cultural content plays a pivotal role in the digital economy, whereas Europe’s digital growth will depend in future on having a varied supply of high- quality cultural content, and whereas it has emerged from consultations and several independent surveys that the cultural and creative sectors are facing common challenges from digitisation
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Takes the view that, accordingly, private copying levies
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Takes the view that, accordingly, private copying levies cannot be collected
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Takes the view that
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Takes the view that Member States in which levies are currently charged or collected should simplify and harmonise their levy rates;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls for the principle of precluding any double payment of private copying levies where sales involve several Member States to be recognised at Community level; recommends, in this regard, that systems be established that provide for, on the one hand, the reimbursement or exemption of manufacturers and distributors where the levies paid concern exported products which had not been made available on the national market and, on the other hand, the possibility for rightholders to carry out checks and audits to determine the quantity of products imported, exported or made available on national markets.
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Member States, in consultation with all stakeholders, to simplify procedures for
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Stresses the need to make clear to consumers the role of the private copying system with regard to remuneration of artists and cultural dissemination; urges Member States
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Stresses the need to make clear to consumers the role of the private copying system with regard to remuneration of artists and cultural dissemination; urges Member States and rightholders to
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Stresses the need to make clear to consumers the role of the private copying system with regard to remuneration of artists and cultural dissemination; urges Member States and rightholders to
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas cultur
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Stresses the need to make clear to consumers the role of the private copying system with regard to remuneration of
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Takes the view that consumers must be informed of the amount and the purpose of the levy paid by them; urges the Commission and Member States accordingly, in consultation with manufacturers, importers, retailers and consumer associations, to ensure that this information is indicated on packaging and, as far as possible, on invoices and receipts issued to consumers;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Takes the view that consumers must be informed of the amount of the levy paid by them; urges the Commission and Member States accordingly
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Takes the view that consumers must be informed of the amount of the levy paid by them; urges the Commission and Member States accordingly, in consultation with manufacturers, importers, retailers
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Takes the view that consumers must be informed of the amount and purpose of the levy paid by them; urges the Commission and Member States accordingly, in consultation with manufacturers, importers, retailers and consumer associations, to ensure that this information is indicated on packaging and, as far as possible, on invoices and receipts issued to consumers;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Takes the view that consumers must be informed of the amount of the levy paid by them
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Takes the view that consumers must be informed of the exact amount of the levy paid by them; urges the Commission and Member States accordingly, in consultation with manufacturers, importers, retailers and consumer associations, to ensure that this information is
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Takes the view that consumers must be informed of the amount of the levy paid by them and, if possible, the use to which it is put; urges the Commission and Member States accordingly, in consultation with manufacturers, importers, retailers and consumer associations, to ensure that this information is indicated on packaging
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Urges Member States to adopt
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas digitisation is having a huge impact on the way in which cultural goods are being produced, distributed, marketed and consumed, and whereas lower distribution costs and the appearance of new distribution channels can facilitate access to creative works and culture and improve the circulation of those works around the world; whereas the market opportunities for new services and businesses have increased enormously as a result;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Member States to
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 3 Transparency regarding allocation of revenue
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Urges Member States to ensure greater transparency regarding the allocation of
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Member States to earmark at least 25% of revenue from private copying levies to promote the creative and performance arts and their production;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Member States to earmark at least
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Member States to earmark at least 25% of revenue from private copying levies to promote the
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls on the Member States to publish reports on the allocation of
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas digitisation is having a huge impact on the way in which cultural
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Points out that
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Points out that private copying exemption arrangements enable consumers to copy
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Points out that private copying exemption arrangements enable consumers to copy freely their musical and audio- visual material from one medium or type of multimedia material to another without the need to seek the authorisation of rightholders, provided that this is for private use; and provided that reproduction of the works is not restricted by the application of technical protection mechanisms;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Points out that private copying exemption
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas digitisation is having a huge impact on the way in which cultural
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21.
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls for the elimination of technical protection measures
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Stresses that technical protection measures should not prevent consumers from making copies or rightholders from being fairly remunerated for private copying.
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Points out that the implementation of exclusive rights does not guarantee all rightholders, and in particular performance artists and certain categories of author in a number of Member States, a fair and proportional share of revenue arising from the use of their works;
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Observes that, despite permanent access to online works, downloading, storage and private copying for offline use is continuing; takes the view that a private copying levy s
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23.
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23.
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the author's claim to protection for his creative work and right to equitable remuneration for that work must also exist in the digital age;
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Observes that,
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Observes that
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Observes that, despite permanent access to online works, downloading, storage and private copying for offline use is continuing, that opportunities for the legal downloading and storage of music and audiovisual material will be welcomed by consumers and that measures to encourage such legal alternatives is the most effective way of preventing infringements of the law; takes the view that a private copying levy system cannot therefore be replaced by a licencing system;
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Observes that,
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Observes that, despite permanent access to online works, downloading, storage and private copying for offline use is continuing;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Notes that the modern digital economy is providing a large multitude of online services where some services technically require copying of the content and others do not and where some of these services would thus be subject to private copying levies and others would not; takes the view that a private copying levy system should therefore be phased out in order not to discriminate between services;
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Stresses that, as for online services, contractual authorisations
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Stresses that, as for online services, contractual authorisations can
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new) Cb. whereas digital private copying has taken on major economic importance as a result of technological progress and the shift to the Internet and Cloud, and the existing system of private copying levies does not take sufficient account of developments in the digital age; whereas there is currently no alternative approach in this area that would ensure appropriate remuneration for the rightholder and at the same time make private copying possible; whereas a discussion therefore needs to be conducted in the long term on a more efficient and up-to-date approach that takes more account of technological progress;
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Stresses that
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Stresses that, as for online services, contractual authorisations concerning private copies cannot be
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Stresses that, as for online services, contractual authorisations can
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Stresses that
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Stresses that, as for online services,
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. The enforcement of exclusive rights, which is the primary means of exercising copyright and related rights, particularly in the digital environment, does not allow effective and proper control over the private use of protected works and items;
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the proposal for a Directive on the collective management of copyright and related rights currently being discussed
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Takes the view that
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Takes the view that private copies of protected works made using new cloud computing technology may have
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Takes the view that private copies of protected works made by natural persons using cloud computing technology may have the same purpose as those made using traditional and/or digital recording media and materials as far as these copies fulfil the conditions of Article 5(2)(b) and article 5(5) of Directive 2001/29/EC; considers that these copies should be taken into account by the private copying compensation mechanisms; Stresses however that cloud computing services that are directly or indirectly part of a commercial activity cannot be covered by the private copy exception; Therefore calls on the Commission to assess the legitimacy of music or audiovisual services which claim to be based on the private copying exception, in particular their impact on the development of legal offers;
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Calls on the Commission to assess the impact on the private copying system of the use of cloud computing technology for the private recording and storage of protected works, so as to determine
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Calls on the Commission to assess the impact on the private copying system of the use of cloud computing technology for the private recording and storage of protected works, so as to determine how these private copies of protected works should be
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Calls on the Commission to assess the impact on private copying systems of the use of cloud computing services for private recording and storage of protected works, so as to determine how these private copies of protected works should be taken into account by private copying compensation mechanisms; stresses the need to look into the legal arrangements for cloud computing services as regards the principles of intellectual property.
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the proposal for a Directive on the collective management of copyright and related rights currently being discussed reinforces that
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27.
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Calls on the Commission and Member States to
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas under Directive 2001/29 /EC, Member States may provide for an exception or limitation to the rightholder's exclusive reproduction right for certain types of reproduction of audio, visual and audio-visual material for private use, accompanied by fair remuneration for the rightholder, and may allow consumers in countries that have introduced that limitation to copy their music and audio- visual collections from one medium or type of multimedia material to another freely and as frequently as they wish, unless they are protected by technological protection measures, without seeking authorisation from the rightholders, provided this is for their private use; whereas any levies should be calculated on the basis of the possible harm to the rightholders resulting from the
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Calls on the Commission and Member States to examine the possibility of legalising works sharing for non- commercial purposes so as to guarantee consumers access to a wide variety of content and real choice in terms of cultural diversity und put forward possible solutions to facilitate the non-commercial and transformative use of works in the everyday digital world without complicated rights clearance procedures and free of legal uncertainty;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 – having regard to the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union, particularly in cases C-467/08, Padawan v SGAE, of 21 October 2010, C-462/09, Stichting de Thuiskopie v Opus Supplies Deutschland GmbH and others, of 16 June 2011, C-277/10, Martin Luksan v Petrus van der Let, of 9 February 2012, C-457/11 – C-460/11, VG Wort v Kyocera Mita and others, of 27 June 2013, and C-521/11, Austro Mechana v Amazon, of 11 July 2013,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas under Directive 2001/29 /EC, Member States may provide for an exception or limitation to the reproduction right for certain types of reproduction of audio, visual and audio-visual material for private use, accompanied by fair remuneration, and may allow consumers in countries that have introduced that limitation to copy their music and audio- visual collections from one medium or type of multimedia material to another freely and as frequently as they wish, without se eking authorisation from the rightholders, provided this is for their private use;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas under Directive 2001/29
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas under Directive 2001/29 /EC, Member States may provide for an exception or limitation to the reproduction right for certain types of reproduction of audio, visual and audio-visual material for private use, accompanied by fair remuneration, and may allow consumers in countries that have introduced that limitation to copy their music and audio- visual collections from one medium or type of multimedia material to another
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas the concept of private copying levies is founded on the false assumption that consumers who make private copies would otherwise have bought multiple licensed copies of the same audio, visual or audio-visual material;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the sum total of private copying levies collected in 23 of the 28 EU Member
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the sum total of private copying levies collected in 23 of the 28 EU Member has more than tripled since Directive 2001/29/EC came into force and, according to the Commission's estimates, now stands at over EUR 600 million, and whereas this constitutes
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas these levies only constitute a
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 – having regard to the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union, particularly in cases C-467/08, Padawan v SGAE, of 21 October 2010, C-457/11 – C-460/11, VG Wort v Kyocera Mita and others, of 27 June 2013,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas these levies
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas many mobile terminals allow copying for private purposes in theory but are in fact not used for this purpose; calls, consequently, for long-term discussions to be conducted with a view to developing a more efficient and up-to-date approach that may not necessarily be based on a flat-rate levy on equipment;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas when the prices at which material sells in a country that charges the levy are compared with those in one that does not, it becomes clear that the private copying levy has no appreciable impact on the prices of products;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas Directive 2001/29/EC and the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union do not require Member States to see that rightholders receive direct payment of the full levy collected for private copying, and whereas the Member States have broad powers of discretion to establish that part of that remuneration should be paid indirectly; whereas there must be no discrimination between national and EU rightholders as regards access to cultural and social payments from social and cultural funds;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas the private copying levy is paid by consumers when purchasing recording or storage media or services
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas media and material prices do
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas disparities exist between the various models and collection rates for private copying levies and between their impact on
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas disparities exist between the various models and collection rates for private copying levies and between their impact on consumers and the single market; and whereas, to preserve the underlying stability of the system in the digital age in these days of the single market, the royalty arrangements in many Member States should be modernised and a European framework
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas disparities exist between the various models and collection rates for private copying levies and between their impact on consumers and the single market; and whereas a European framework should be created that guarantees that equivalent conditions apply to rightholders, consumers, manufacturers and importers of equipment and service providers across the Union until levies have been phased out;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas the exemption and reimbursement arrangements for professional uses which have been introduced in the Member States have to be effective; whereas in some Member States these arrangements are far from satisfactory and
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas the exemption and
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas in the case of online music sales, licence-granting practices are
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas in the case of online music sales, licence-granting practices are
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas in the case of online music sales, licence-granting practices
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas in the case of online music sales, licence-granting practices
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas in the case of online
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas in the case of online
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N a (new) Na. whereas in the digital field in particular the classic copying process is being replaced by streaming systems where no copy of the copyrighted works is placed on the user's terminal, and preference should therefore be given to licensing models in these cases;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 6 a (new) - having regard to the impact assessment accompanying the document "Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online uses in the internal market
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Points out that the cultural sector provides
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes that only some Member States have opted to introduce an exception for private copying, with compensation for right holders, and that the cultural sector is a strong driving force for growth also in Member States which have not opted to impose private copy levies;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Recalls that copyright law should balance the interests of inter alia creators and consumers; in this context considers that all European consumers should have a right to make private copies of legally acquired content;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Therefore calls upon the Commission to present a legislative proposal to review Directive 2001/29/EC on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society including a provision to fully harmonize exceptions and limitations with regards, inter alia, to private copying;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Considers further that private copying of legally acquired content constitutes a normal use of the acquired products or services by the consumer which does not harm the legitimate interests of right holders and which should thus not warrant any compensation;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises that
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises that in times of budget austerity, private copying levies constitute a
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes that private copying levies currently constitute a source of income which is of varying importance for different categories of right holders and that its importance varies significantly between Member States;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that the private copying system is a virtuous system that balances the
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that the private copying system is a virtuous system that balances the
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that the private copying system is a virtuous system that balances the option of, and the right to, copying for private use with fair remuneration to rightholders, and that it is a system worth preserving;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that the current private copying system
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that the private copying system is a virtuous system that balances the
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that the private copying system is a
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that the private copying levy system is a
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises that the major disparities between national systems for the collection of levies, especially as regards the types of product subject to the levy and the rates of levy,
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Invites the
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 9 a (new) - having regard to the Working Document of the Committee on Legal Affairs "Copyright in the music and audiovisual sectors", approved on 29 June 2011,
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Invites the Member States to decide on
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Invites the
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Invites the Member States to
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to consider whether they might implement an enhanced cooperation procedure with a view to establishing a European private copying levy system;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 2 Single collection procedure, clearer consumer information and more efficient reimbursement procedures during the phase out period
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Considers that the private copying levy should apply to all material
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Considers that the private copying levy should apply to
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas culture and artistic creation form the bedrock of the European identity past and present
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Considers that the private copying levy should apply
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Considers that the private copying levy should
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that the notion of private copies should be clearly defined for all materials and that the user should be able to access the copyright content on all media on the basis of a single payment; calls for arrangements already in force in Member States, such as exceptions and levy exemptions, to be respected and for it to be possible for them to apply in parallel on the market;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Considers that private copying levies should be payable by
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Considers that, in the light of the ECJ judgments, private copying levies
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Considers that private copying levies should be payable by retailers, as this would simplify procedures and prevent double payments;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Recommends that, in addition to this primary responsibility incumbent upon manufacturers and importers, there should be a joint responsibility applying to all those involved in the sales chain, extending as far as the ultimate consumer, the object being to prevent fraud and unfair competition;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas cultural content plays a pivotal role in the digital economy, whereas Europe’s digital growth will depend in future on having a varied supply of high- quality cultural content, and whereas it has emerged from consultations and several independent surveys that the cultural and creative sectors are facing common challenges from digitisation and globalisation
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Recommends that, in the case of cross-
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Recommends that, in the case of cross- border transactions, private copying levies be collected in the Member State in which the
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Recommends that, in the case of cross- border transactions, private copying levies be collected in the Member State in which
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Recommends that, in the case of cross- border transactions, private copying levies be collected in the Member State in which the product is p
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Recommends that, in the case of cross- border transactions, private copying levies be collected in the Member State
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Recommends that, in the case of cross- border transactions, private copying levies be collected in the Member State in which the product is
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Commission to assess the desirability of setting up a European declaration portal to lighten the workload and simplify the declaration process for manufacturers and importers; notes that the purpose of such a portal would be to provide a single site on which importers and distance sellers could declare cross- border sales and movements of eligible products;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls for confirmation at EU level that the country of destination rule applies where cross-border transactions are concerned; notes that the harm to be made good is brought about not by the movement of recording media, but by the reproduction carried out on those media by a natural person for a private use; considers that the distance seller must therefore be liable for payment of the levy chargeable under the law of the country where the media are purchased by the end users;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 source: PE-521.789
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0789/COM_COM(2012)0789_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0789/COM_COM(2012)0789_EN.pdf |
events/4/docs |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0789/COM_COM(2012)0789_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0789/COM_COM(2012)0789_EN.pdf |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE519.560New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-PR-519560_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE521.789New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AM-521789_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0114&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2014-0114_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0179New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0179_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
JURI/7/12936New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de183dd0fb8127435bdbcbbNew
4f1ac710b819f25efd000064 |
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de1896e0fb8127435bdc49eNew
4f1adc99b819f207b3000128 |
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de183dd0fb8127435bdbcbbNew
4f1ac710b819f25efd000064 |
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de1896e0fb8127435bdc49eNew
4f1adc99b819f207b3000128 |
activities/3/docs/0 |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Debate in ParliamentNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de183dd0fb8127435bdbcbbNew
4f1ac710b819f25efd000064 |
committees/1/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de1896e0fb8127435bdc49eNew
4f1adc99b819f207b3000128 |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052 |
activities/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/3 |
|
activities/2/docs/0/text |
|
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/1 |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2014-02-25T00:00:00New
2014-02-27T00:00:00 |
activities/1/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/1/date |
Old
2014-02-24T00:00:00New
2014-02-25T00:00:00 |
activities/1/date |
Old
2014-02-03T00:00:00New
2014-02-24T00:00:00 |
activities/1/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/2 |
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/5 |
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2014-01-14T00:00:00New
2012-12-18T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
For information |
activities/4/date |
Old
2014-01-13T00:00:00New
2014-02-03T00:00:00 |
activities/4/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
Old
CELEX:52012PC0789:ENNew
CELEX:52012DC0789:EN |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
Old
CELEX:52012DC0789:ENNew
CELEX:52012PC0789:EN |
activities/1/committees/1/shadows |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/5 |
|
committees/1/shadows |
|
activities/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE521.789
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE519.560
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2013-09-20T00:00:00New
2013-10-09T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE519.560
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2013-09-20T00:00:00New
2012-12-18T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0789:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/0/docs/0/title |
Old
PE519.560New
COM(2012)0789 |
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
For information |
activities/0/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0789/COM_COM(2012)0789_EN.pdf
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
For information |
activities/3 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2013-09-20T00:00:00New
2012-12-18T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0789:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/0/docs/0/title |
Old
PE519.560New
COM(2012)0789 |
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
For information |
activities/0/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0789/COM_COM(2012)0789_EN.pdf
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
For information |
activities/3 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
Legislative proposalNew
For information |
activities/0/type |
Old
Legislative proposalNew
For information |
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
For informationNew
Legislative proposal |
activities/0/type |
Old
For informationNew
Legislative proposal |
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
Legislative proposalNew
For information |
activities/0/type |
Old
Legislative proposalNew
For information |
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
For informationNew
Legislative proposal |
activities/0/type |
Old
For informationNew
Legislative proposal |
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
Legislative proposalNew
For information |
activities/0/type |
Old
Legislative proposalNew
For information |
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
For informationNew
Legislative proposal |
activities/0/type |
Old
For informationNew
Legislative proposal |
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
Legislative proposalNew
For information |
activities/0/type |
Old
Legislative proposalNew
For information |
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
For informationNew
Legislative proposal |
activities/0/type |
Old
For informationNew
Legislative proposal |
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
Legislative proposalNew
For information |
activities/0/type |
Old
Legislative proposalNew
For information |
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
For informationNew
Legislative proposal |
activities/0/type |
Old
For informationNew
Legislative proposal |
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
Legislative proposalNew
For information |
activities/0/type |
Old
Legislative proposalNew
For information |
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
For informationNew
Legislative proposal |
activities/0/type |
Old
For informationNew
Legislative proposal |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
Legislative proposalNew
For information |
activities/0/type |
Old
Legislative proposalNew
For information |
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
For informationNew
Legislative proposal |
activities/0/type |
Old
For informationNew
Legislative proposal |
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
Legislative proposalNew
For information |
activities/0/type |
Old
Legislative proposalNew
For information |
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
For informationNew
Legislative proposal |
activities/0/type |
Old
For informationNew
Legislative proposal |
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
Legislative proposalNew
For information |
activities/0/type |
Old
Legislative proposalNew
For information |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|