BETA

Activities of Elisabetta GARDINI related to 2011/0190(COD)

Plenary speeches (3)

Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0190(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0190(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0190(COD)

Amendments (15)

Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) Passenger ships operate mostly in ports or close to coastal areas and their impacts on human health and the environment are significant. Those shipPassenger ships on regular services are required to use marine fuel with the samea maximum sulphur content as is applicable in SECAs (1.5%). Given that stricter sulphur standards will apply in SECAs, it is justified by the need to improve air quality around ports and coasts in the non-SECA territories that the same standards apply to passenger ships. However, the introduction of a new SECA standard for passenger ships would be delayed by 5 years in order to avoid potential problems with fuel availabilityof 1.5%.
2011/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) In order to ensure air quality benefits to the Member States whose coasts are not part of SECAs, the introduction of any new emission control areas should be subject to the IMO process under Annex VI to MARPOL and be underpinned by a well-founded case based on environmental and economic grounds and supported by scientific data, as stipulated in the Commission's Communication on the review of the implementation of Directive 1999/32/EC related to the Sulphur Content of Certain Liquid Fuels and on further pollutant emission reduction from maritime transport1. ___________________ 1 COM(2011) 441 final.
2011/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) Member States should ensure the availability and balanced distribution of compliant fuel in accordance with Regulation 18 of the revised Annex VI to MARPOL. In the event that compliant fuel might not be available in some ports (for example, those lacking in the physical distribution of compliant fuel), the ship should be permitted to invoke the exemption as provided for under Regulation 18 of the revised Annex VI to MARPOL. The ship should not be required to deviate from its intended voyage or to delay unduly the voyage in order to achieve compliance.
2011/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 14 a (new)
(14a) Due account should be taken of the Council Conclusions on Impact Assessment adopted at the 5-6 December 2011 Competitiveness Council, which recall that the Inter-Institutional Agreement on better law making and the following Inter-Institutional Common Approach to Impact Assessment provide that the European Parliament and the Council undertake to carry out impact assessments when they consider this to be appropriate and necessary prior to the adoption of any substantive amendment. Furthermore, the Council Working Parties, in line with the Common Approach to Impact Assessments should be encouraged to make use of the possibility to invite the Commission to complement its original impact assessment taking into account inter alia relevant information presented by the Member States and to assist in the Council’s impact assessment work.
2011/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive 1999/32/EC
Article 2 – point 3 m
3m. emission abatement method means any fitting, material, appliance or apparatus to be fitted in a ship or other procedure, alternative fuel, or compliance method, used as an alternative to low sulphur marine fuel meeting the requirements set out in this Directive, that is verifiable, quantifiable and enforceable, according to emission abatement methods agreed upon in the IMO;
2011/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b
Directive 1999/32/EC
Article 4 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
This paragraph shall apply to all vessels of all flags, including vessels whose journey began outside the Union with the exception of ships that are granted an exemption from the requirements under Annex VI to MARPOL.
2011/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6 – point c
Directive 1999/32/EC
Article 4 a – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) 0.50 % as from 1 January 2020 or 2025.
2011/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6 – point c
Directive 1999/32/EC
Article 4 a – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 2
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 9a of this Directive concerning the date from which the sulphur standard laid down in point (b) of this paragraph applies in accordance with the final decision taken in the IMO. Based on the assessment by the IMO of the availability of marine fuel to comply with the maximum sulphur content of fuel of 0.50% by mass, referred to in Regulation 14(8) of Annex VI of MARPOL, this date shall be 1 January 2020 or 1 January 2025.
2011/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6 – point d
Directive 1999/32/EC
Article 4 a – paragraph 2
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 9a of this Directive concerning the designation of sea areas as SOx Emission Control Areas on the basis of the decision of the IMO in accordance with Regulation 14(3)(2) of Annex VI to MARPOL. The introduction of any new Emission Control Areas shall be subject to the IMO process under Annex VI to MARPOL and be underpinned by a well-founded case based on the IMO criteria and on environmental and economic grounds and supported by scientific data.
2011/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6 – point e
Directive 1999/32/EC
Article 4 a – paragraph 4 – point d
(d) 0.10 % as from 1 January 202050% as from 1 January 2020 or 2025 in accordance with the final decision taken in the IMO. Based on the assessment of the availability of marine fuel to comply with the maximum sulphur content of fuel of 0.50% by mass, referred to in Regulation 14(8) of Annex VI of MARPOL, this date shall be 1 January 2020 or 1 January 2025.
2011/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/32/EC
Article 4 b – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that marine gas oils are not placed on the market in their territory if the sulphur content of those marine gas oils exceeds 0.10 50% by mass.
2011/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/32/EC
Article 4 b a (new)
Article 4ba Equivalents The administration of a Member State may allow any fitting, material, appliance or apparatus to be fitted in a ship or other procedures, alternative fuel oils, or compliance methods used as an alternative to that required by this Directive if such fitting, material, appliance or apparatus or other procedures, alternative fuel oils, or compliance methods are at least as effective in terms of emissions reductions as that required by this Directive, including any of the standards laid down in Articles 4a and 4b.
2011/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/32/EC
Article 4 c – paragraph 2
2. Ships using the emission abatement methods referred to in paragraph 1 shall continuoussistently achieve reductions of sulphur dioxide emissions that are at least equivalent to the reductions that would be achieved by using marine fuels that meet the requirements of Articles 4a and 4b. The sulphur dioxide emissions resulting from the use of the emission abatement methods shall not exceed the limit values set out in Annex 1.
2011/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/32/EC
Article 4 c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
The Commission shall take into account,acknowledge inter alia, scientific and technological progress as well as the relevant instruments and standards adopted by the International Maritime Organisation.
2011/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a directive
Annex
Directive 1999/32/EC
Annex 2 – paragraph 2 – indent 2
– document thoroughly that, by compliance with the wash water requirements in IMO Resolution MEPC.184(59) any waste streams discharged into the sea, including enclosed ports, harbours and estuaries have no significant negative impacts on and do not pose risks to human health and the environment.
2011/12/16
Committee: ENVI