Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ENVI | HASSI Satu ( Verts/ALE) | |
Committee Opinion | TRAN | SAVISAAR-TOOMAST Vilja ( ALDE) | Keith TAYLOR ( Verts/ALE), Janusz ZEMKE ( S&D) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 192-p1
Legal Basis:
TFEU 192-p1Subjects
Events
This is the First Progress report prepared by the Commission on the implementation of its Staff Working Paper "Pollutant emission reduction from maritime transport and the Sustainable Waterborne Transport Toolbox" (also known as the ‘toolbox’). It covers the period September 2011 to January 2013.
To recap, the toolbox accompanied the proposal for an amendment to Directive 1999/32/EC transposing the 2008 International Maritime Organization (IMO) standards on the maximum level of sulphur permitted for fuels used in the shipping sector. It proposed a number of short-term accompanying measures, under the current financial perspective, to reduce compliance costs in relation to the new low sulphur standards, as well as a set of medium and longer-term accompanying measures aimed at addressing the environmental challenges confronting the EU shipping sector from a broader perspective and in a more integrated manner .
The report presents the current state of implementation of the measures set out in the toolbox and puts forward proposals for closer cooperation between the Commission, Member States and industry stakeholders to manage the implementation of the measures and provides a means for developing additional measures where appropriate.
The report briefly describes the progress to date related to the short-term accompanying measures , which were aimed at ensuring that current EU financial instruments, and national funding schemes, would continue to provide specific support to maritime-based projects which focused on promoting solutions complying with the new low sulphur standard.
Work on the formulation of medium and longer-term accompanying measures has already commenced with a set of actions focusing on identifying and addressing the regulatory gaps hampering the safe and secure implementation of clean ship technologies and use of alternative fuels, notably marine LNG, as well as on the development of the necessary standards and green infrastructure.
The report briefly outlines the way forward for the Commission, Member States, and industry stakeholders to jointly progress the toolbox implementation. In this context, the Commission proposes the creation of a dedicated expert group – the European Sustainable Shipping Forum (ESSF).
Next steps: the ESSF will provide a platform for a structural dialogue, exchange of best practices and technical knowledge, cooperation, and coordination amongst relevant public and private maritime industries' stakeholders and relevant Commission services in areas jointly identified. The ESSF will be assisted by technical working groups which will focus in the first instance on scrubbing technology and marine LNG deployment, coordination of research and development activities and innovation (working on the basis of the broader research and development orientations provided by the WATERBORNE Technology Platform), financing aspects and exchange of best practices for the implementation of Directive 2012/33/EU.
Annex 1 to this report presents a Roadmap for advancing the implementation of the Sustainable Waterborne Transport Toolbox and Annex 2 lists the TEN-T co-funded Motorways of the Sea (MoS) and ports projects in support of the low sulphur political priority.
PURPOSE: to amend Directive 1999/32/EC as regards the sulphur content of marine fuels with a view to reducing air pollution and improve human health and the environment.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Directive 2012/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 199/32/EC as regards the sulphur content of marine fuels.
CONTENT: following an agreement at first reading with the European Parliament, the Council adopted a Directive amending Directive 1999/32/EC as regards the sulphur content of marine fuels.
Emissions from shipping due to the combustion of marine fuels with a high sulphur content contribute to air pollution in the form of sulphur dioxide and particulate matter, which harm human health and the environment and contribute to acid deposition. This Directive therefore seeks to amend Directive 1999/32/EC in order to substantially reduce these emissions by making the most recent International Maritime Organisation (IMO) rules with respect to marine fuels binding in the EU .
The main changes introduced by the Directive are as follows:
Maximum sulphur content: in order to ensure coherence with international law as well as to secure proper enforcement of new globally established sulphur standards in the Union, Directive 1999/32/EC is aligned with the revised Annex VI to MARPOL . In accordance with this revised annex:
the maximum sulphur content of marine fuels used in SOx Emission Control Areas is set at: (i) 1% until 31 December 2014 and (ii) 0.1% as from 1 January 2015 ; the maximum sulphur content of marine fuels used in maritime areas not in SOx Emission Control Areas is set at: (i) 3.5% as from 18 June 2014 and (ii) 0.5% as from 1 January 2020 .
Member States shall:
ensure that marine fuels are not used within their territory if their sulphur content exceeds 3.5 % by mass , except for fuels supplied to ships using emission abatement methods operating in closed mode; ensure that gas oils are not used within their territory if their sulphur content exceeds 0.1% by mass ; take all necessary measures to ensure that marine fuels are not used in their territorial seas, exclusive economic zones and pollution control zones falling outside SOx Emission Control Areas by passenger ships operating on regular services to or from any Union port if the sulphur content of those fuels exceeds 1.5 % by mass until 1 January 2020 .
Member States shall endeavour to ensure the availability of marine fuels which comply with this Directive and inform the Commission of the availability of such marine fuels in its ports and terminals.
Member States shall, as an alternative solution for reducing emissions, encourage the use of onshore power supply systems by docked vessels.
Financial measures: Member States may adopt financial measures in favour of operators affected by this Directive where such financial measures are in accordance with State aid rules applicable and to be adopted in this area.
Member States may, in cooperation with other Member States, as appropriate, approve trials of ship emission abatement methods on vessels flying their flag, or in sea areas within their jurisdiction.
Penalties: Member States shall determine the penalties applicable to breaches of the national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive. The penalties determined must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive and may include fines calculated in such a way as to ensure that the fines at least deprive those responsible of the economic benefits derived from their infringement and that those fines gradually increase for repeated infringements.
Report and monitoring: by 31 December 2013 the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council which shall be accompanied, if appropriate, by legislative proposals. The Commission shall consider in its report the potential for reducing air pollution taking into account, inter alia : annual reports; observed air quality and acidification; fuel costs; potential economic impact and observed modal shift; and progress in reducing emissions from ships.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 17/12/2012.
TRANSPOSITION: no later than 18/06/2014.
DELEGATED ACTS: the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts to amend the provisions of Directive 1999/32/EC to scientific and technical progress and in such a way as to ensure strict consistency with the relevant instruments of the IMO. The power to adopt delegated acts shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of five years from 17 December 2012 (a period that may be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless Parliament or the Council objects). A delegated act shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of three months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by three months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council. If the European Parliament or the Council objects, the delegated act does not enter into force.
The European Parliament adopted by 606 votes to 55, with 13 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal on the proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 1999/32/EC as regards the sulphur content of marine fuels.
Parliament adopted its position on first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure. The agreement was the result of a compromise negotiated between Parliament and Council. The main amendments to the proposal are as follows:
Definitions: according to the amended text:
Heavy fuel oil means:
any petroleum-derived liquid fuel, excluding marine fuel, falling within CN code 2710 19 51 to 2710 19 68, 2710 20 31, 2710 20 35, 2710 20 39, or any petroleum-derived liquid fuel, other than gas oil as defined in points 2 and 3, which, by reason of its distillation limits, falls within the category of heavy oils intended for use as fuel and of which less than 65% by volume (including losses) distils at 250 o C by the ASTM D86 method. If the distillation cannot be determined by the ASTM D86 method, the petroleum product is likewise categorised as a heavy fuel oil;
Gas oil means:
any petroleum-derived liquid fuel, excluding marine fuel, falling within CN code 2710 19 25, 2710 19 29, 2710 19 47, 2710 19 48, 2710 20 17 or 2710 20 19, or any petroleum-derived liquid fuel, excluding marine fuel, of which less than 65% by volume (including losses) distils at 250 o C and of which at least 85% by volume (including losses) distils at 350 o C by the ASTM D86 method.
Diesel fuels, as defined in Directive 98/70/EC relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels, are excluded from this definition. Fuels used in non-road mobile machinery and agricultural tractors are also excluded from this definition.
Maximum sulphur content in marine fuel: Member States shall:
ensure that marine fuels are not used within their territory if their sulphur content exceeds 3,50% by mass , except for fuels supplied to ships using emission abatement methods operating in closed mode; take all necessary measures to ensure that marine fuels are not used in the areas of their territorial seas, exclusive economic zones and pollution control zones if the sulphur content of those fuels by mass exceeds 3.50% as from 18 months following the entry into force of the Directive ; take all necessary measures to ensure that marine fuels are not used in their territorial seas, exclusive economic zones and pollution control zones falling outside SOx Emission Control Areas by passenger ships operating on regular services to or from any Union port if the sulphur content of those fuels exceeds 1,50% by mass until 1 January 2020 . Member States shall be responsible for the enforcement of this requirement at least in respect of vessels flying their flag and vessels of all flags while in their ports.
Availability of martne fuels that comply with this Directive: Member States shall endeavour to ensure the availability of marine fuels which comply with this Directive and inform the Commission of the availability of such marine fuels in its ports and terminals.
If a ship is found by a Member State not to be in compliance with the standards for marine fuels which comply with this Directive, the competent authority of the Member State is entitled to require the ship to:
present a record of the actions taken to attempt to achieve compliance; and provide evidence that it attempted to purchase marine fuel which complies with this Directive in accordance with its voyage plan and, if it was not made available where planned, that attempts were made to locate alternative sources for such marine fuel and that, despite best efforts to obtain marine fuel which complies with this Directive, no such marine fuel was made available for purchase.
The ship shall not be required to deviate from its intended voyage or to delay unduly the voyage in order to achieve compliance. A port State shall notify the Commission when a ship has presented evidence of the non-availability of marine fuels which comply with this Directive.
Member States shall ensure that marine diesel oils are not placed on the market in their territory if the sulphur content of those marine diesel oils exceeds 1.50% by mass.
Emission abatement methods: Member States shall, as an alternative solution for reducing emissions, encourage the use of onshore power supply systems by docked vessels.
Where justified in the light of scientific and technical progress regarding alternative emission abatement methods and in such a way as to ensure strict consistency with the relevant instruments and standards adopted by the IMO, the Commission shall i) be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 9a amending Annexes I and II; ii) adopt implementing acts laying down the detailed requirements for monitoring of emissions, where appropriate.
Financial measures: Member States may adopt financial measures in favour of operators affected by this Directive where such financial measures are in accordance with State aid rules applicable and to be adopted in this area.
Report and follow-up: by 31 December 2013 , the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council which shall be accompanied, if appropriate, by legislative proposals. The Commission shall consider in its report the potential for reducing air pollution taking into account, inter alia: annual reports submitted in accordance with paragraph 1 and 1a; observed air quality and acidification; fuel costs; potential economic impact and observed modal shift; and progress in reducing emissions from ships.
The Commission shall, in cooperation with Member States and stakeholders, by 31 December 2012 , develop appropriate measures promoting compliance with the environmental standards of this Directive, and minimising the possible negative impacts.
Penalties: Member States shall determine the penalties applicable to breaches of the national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive. The penalties determined must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive and may include fines calculated in such a way as to ensure that the fines at least deprive those responsible of the economic benefits derived from their infringement and that those fines gradually increase for repeated infringements.
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted the report by Statu HASSI (Greens/EFA, FI) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 1999/32/EC as regards the sulphur content of marine fuels.
The committee recommends that the European Parliament’s position in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Biofuels: stressing that the use of biofuels is already today technically possible for vessels, Members consider that the Directive clearly allow bio-fuels to be used.
Maximum sulphur content of marine fuels used in SOx Emission Control Areas and by passenger ships operating to or from Union ports:
· Members propose that SECA bordering Member States must be allowed to compensate temporarily through state aid the costs for the enterprises that are under global competition and which are exposed to significant costs related to sulphur regulation. The Commission shall adopt at the latest by the end of 2013 guidance on applicable state aid rules to be followed in this regard.
· The report states that marine fuels should not be used in the areas of their territorial seas, exclusive economic zones and pollution control zones if the sulphur content of those fuels by mass exceeds: (a) 3.50 % as of 1 January 2012; (b) 0.50 % as from 1 January 2015; (c) 0.10 % as from 1 January 2020.
· In the event of non-compliance with these and after examination of all pieces of evidence, authorities exercising Port State Control shall be empowered to detain the ship until the violation has been rectified. On-compliant vessels shall be required to de-bunker and be subject to a penalty for each violation per day.
· By way of derogation , where conformity with the limit values result in a significant negative social impact on local communities living on islands in the outermost regions of the Union and on the whole or part of the territory of Greece, the Member States concerned may postpone by a maximum of five years the deadlines referred to in that paragraph with regard to a limited number of passenger ships operating on regular services on routes between Union ports, provided that the relevant air quality standards are respected.
· Furthermore, Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure that marine fuels are not used in their territorial seas and pollution control zones falling outside SOx Emission Control Areas by any ships to or from any Union port if the sulphur content of those fuels by mass exceeds 0.10 % as from 1 January 2015. This shall apply to all vessels of all flags, including vessels whose journey began outside the Union.
Maximum sulphur content of marine fuels used by ships on inland waterways, and by any ships at berth in Union ports: the report notes that under the current regime, different sulphur limit values apply to ocean-going ships and inland vessels, even though they sail in the same estuary. Members propose to remedy this and align the sulphur content of marine fuels used by ships on inland waterways, in the territorial seas of the Union or by any ships at berth in Union ports with the values contained in Directive 98/70/EC from 1 January 2015.
Availability of marine fuels : Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure the availability and balanced distribution of marine fuels where the sulphur content does not exceed 0,10% as from 1 January 2015.
Equivalents: the Administration of a Member State may allow any fitting, material, appliance or apparatus to be fitted in a ship or other procedure, alternative fuel oil or compliance method used as an alternative to that required by this Directive if such fitting, or other procedure, alternative fuel oil or compliance method is at least as effective in terms of emissions reductions as that required by the Directive.
Use of new technologies for emission reduction : the proposal provides that ships using the emission abatement methods shall continuously achieve reductions of sulphur dioxide emissions that are at least equivalent to the reductions that would be achieved by using marine fuels that meet the requirements of the directive. Members propose to delete the word “continuously” so as to ensure that scrubbers which may temporarily fall out of compliance are still permitted under the Directive. The deletion would also allow for the use of other compliance methods such as averaging.
Member States shall, as an alternative solution for reducing emissions, encourage the use of onshore power supply systems by docked vessels.
Members also state that port authorities must include in the harbour fee or other charges any costs of reception, handling and disposal of effluents from exhaust gas cleaning systems in accordance with Directive 2000/59/EC, irrespective of whether or not wastes are delivered.
Fuel oil availability : the report inserts a new provision stating that if a ship is found by a Member State not to be in compliance with the standards for compliant fuel oils set out in the Directive, the competent authority of the Member State may require the ship to: (a) present a record of the actions taken to attempt to achieve compliance; and (b) provide evidence that it attempted to purchase compliant fuel oil in accordance with its voyage plan and, if it was not made available where planned, that attempts were made to locate alternative sources for such fuel oil and that despite best efforts to obtain compliant fuel oil, no such fuel oil was made available for purchase.
Reports and review: the Commission shall, by 31 December 2013, submit a report which shall be accompanied, if appropriate, by legislative proposals. The Commission shall consider in its report:
· potential impacts on the internal market, in particular regarding competitiveness, from the application of different emissions standards in the Union ;
· the designation of additional SOx and NOx Emission Control Areas;
· quality standards for marine fuel oils along the lines of those applicable to Directive 98/70/EC;
· additional or alternative complementary measures to further reduce emissions from ships.'
The Commission shall also carry out an impact assessment of this Directive and by the end of 2012 propose a set of compensatory measures to diminish the negative impacts on shipping industries throughout the Union.
The Council took note of a progress report on the proposal for a directive amending directive 1999/32/EC as regards the sulphur content of marine fuels. The Council will pursue its work on the text under the incoming Danish Presidency.
Member states in general welcomed the report and several ministers underlined the harmful effects for human health of emissions from shipping due to the combustion of marine fuels with a high sulphur content, which contribute to air pollution in the form of sulphur dioxide and particulate matter, thus also causing acidification. Several member states and the Commission called for the application of stricter fuel quality standards applicable to SO2 Emission Control Areas (SECAs) to all territorial waters of the EU Member States. However, some ministers pointed out that this could lead to distortions of competition, since other non-EU countries will not apply the same rules and therefore any SECAs enlargement should only be done within the framework of the IMO.
Furthermore, a number of ministers also expressed concerns regarding the fact that adapting vessels to comply with the new rules would imply additional costs for ship owners and required a transitional period. Some member states also voiced doubts on the availability of low sulphur fuels from the date of entry into force of the directive.
PURPOSE: to amend Directive 1999/32/EC as regards the sulphur content of marine fuels with a view to reducing air pollution and improve human health and the environment.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: t he EU actions over the past decades have resulted in a considerable reduction of emissions of most air pollutants, including sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), volatile organic compounds, ammonia and particulate matter (PM). The greatest share of these reductions has been achieved by land-based emission sources such as industrial plants or road transport. Evidence shows that further reduction of such pollutants will deliver significant benefits to the health of EU citizens, the environment, and the economy at large. Projections made in 2005 showed that without further regulatory action the continued growth in emissions of SO2 and NOx from the maritime sector will surpass total emissions of these pollutants from all land-based sources by 2020 .
Directive 1999/32/EC as amended regulates the sulphur content of fuels used by maritime transport and incorporates certain rules, agreed under the International Maritime Organisation (IMO), into EU law. In particular, the Directive incorporates more stringent rules on sulphur content of marine fuels to be used in areas in need of special environmental protection, the Sulphur Emission Control Areas (SECAs).
Since the amendment of the Directive in 2005, and with strong EU support, IMO rules, among others in relation to SO2, were revised in October 2008 . These rules are contained in Annex VI of the Marine Pollution Convention 73/78 (Revised MARPOL Annex VI).
The revised Annex VI to MARPOL entered into force on 1 July 2010. It introduces, inter alia, stricter sulphur limits for marine fuel in SECAs (1.00% as of 1 July 2010 and 0.10% as of 1 January 2015) as well as in sea areas outside SECAs (3.5% as of 1 January 2012 and, in principle, 0.50% as of 1 January 2020).
Most Member States are obliged to require ships to use fuel with maximum 1.00% sulphur content in SECAs as of 1 July 2010 based on their international commitments. In order to ensure coherence with international law as well as to secure proper enforcement of new globally established sulphur standards in the Union, the provisions of Directive 1999/32/EC should be aligned with the revised Annex VI to MARPOL .
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: in its analysis, the Commission:
confirms the cost-effectiveness of the full alignment of the Directive with the IMO stricter fuel standards and the rules on emission abatement methods; recommends maintaining the link between the stricter fuel standards in SECAs and those applying for passenger ships on a regular service outside SECAs. However, the introduction of a new SECA standard for passenger ships would be delayed by 5 years in order to avoid potential problems with fuel availability. The benefit to cost ratios for this option range from 1.5 to 6 (if the 0.1% standard is introduced in 2020) and from 0.8 to 10 (if the 0.1% standard is introduced in 2025); suggests to first develop guidance on monitoring and implementation of the Directive and, should this approach fail, to consider adopting binding rules; recommends that the European Commission and Member States use and, where possible and necessary, adapt existing instruments, to assist industry in the transition towards the new best available technology standards.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 192(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
CONTENT: this proposal is consistent with the EU 2020 Strategy and its associated flagship initiatives, notably those relating to the low carbon society roadmaps and innovation Union , as well as existing EU policies for sustainable transport.
The purpose of this proposal is to revise Directive 99/32/EC on the sulphur content of certain liquid fuels with the aim to:
(1) align the Directive with the IMO rules on fuel standards, including the standards applicable outside SECAs;
(2) align the Directive with the IMO rules on the emission abatement methods;
(3) maintain the link between the stricter fuel standards in SECAs (now requiring maximum sulphur content of marine fuel of 1.5% and from 2015 - 0.1%) and those applying for passenger ships on a regular service outside SECAs (at the moment 1.5%);
(4) strengthen EU monitoring and enforcement regime.
According to the Commission, the main advantages of the proposed Regulation are as follows:
incorporating the international fuel standards into EU law would strengthen the effectiveness of these standards as they would be monitored and enforced under the EU regime, which is more effective than the international enforcement system; extended access to and promoting the use of innovate emission abatement methods as an equivalent compliance option addresses concerns about the cost implications resulting from the new IMO rules for certain industries. This would significantly lower the IMO compliance costs (by 50% to 88%) and promote innovative industry solutions, in line with the priorities of the Europe 2020 Strategy and Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU); stricter fuel standards for passenger ships on a regular service , which operate mostly in ports or close to shore, would ensure improvement of air quality in coastal areas. The introduction of the stricter fuel standard for passenger ships would be delayed by 5 years in comparison with SECAs in order to avoid potential problems with fuel availability; lastly, strengthening EU monitoring and enforcement regime is particularly important considering that the significantly stricter fuel standards and the associated compliance costs may increase the incentives for circumvention.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: this proposal has no budgetary implication for the Union budget.
PURPOSE: to amend Directive 1999/32/EC as regards the sulphur content of marine fuels with a view to reducing air pollution and improve human health and the environment.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: t he EU actions over the past decades have resulted in a considerable reduction of emissions of most air pollutants, including sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), volatile organic compounds, ammonia and particulate matter (PM). The greatest share of these reductions has been achieved by land-based emission sources such as industrial plants or road transport. Evidence shows that further reduction of such pollutants will deliver significant benefits to the health of EU citizens, the environment, and the economy at large. Projections made in 2005 showed that without further regulatory action the continued growth in emissions of SO2 and NOx from the maritime sector will surpass total emissions of these pollutants from all land-based sources by 2020 .
Directive 1999/32/EC as amended regulates the sulphur content of fuels used by maritime transport and incorporates certain rules, agreed under the International Maritime Organisation (IMO), into EU law. In particular, the Directive incorporates more stringent rules on sulphur content of marine fuels to be used in areas in need of special environmental protection, the Sulphur Emission Control Areas (SECAs).
Since the amendment of the Directive in 2005, and with strong EU support, IMO rules, among others in relation to SO2, were revised in October 2008 . These rules are contained in Annex VI of the Marine Pollution Convention 73/78 (Revised MARPOL Annex VI).
The revised Annex VI to MARPOL entered into force on 1 July 2010. It introduces, inter alia, stricter sulphur limits for marine fuel in SECAs (1.00% as of 1 July 2010 and 0.10% as of 1 January 2015) as well as in sea areas outside SECAs (3.5% as of 1 January 2012 and, in principle, 0.50% as of 1 January 2020).
Most Member States are obliged to require ships to use fuel with maximum 1.00% sulphur content in SECAs as of 1 July 2010 based on their international commitments. In order to ensure coherence with international law as well as to secure proper enforcement of new globally established sulphur standards in the Union, the provisions of Directive 1999/32/EC should be aligned with the revised Annex VI to MARPOL .
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: in its analysis, the Commission:
confirms the cost-effectiveness of the full alignment of the Directive with the IMO stricter fuel standards and the rules on emission abatement methods; recommends maintaining the link between the stricter fuel standards in SECAs and those applying for passenger ships on a regular service outside SECAs. However, the introduction of a new SECA standard for passenger ships would be delayed by 5 years in order to avoid potential problems with fuel availability. The benefit to cost ratios for this option range from 1.5 to 6 (if the 0.1% standard is introduced in 2020) and from 0.8 to 10 (if the 0.1% standard is introduced in 2025); suggests to first develop guidance on monitoring and implementation of the Directive and, should this approach fail, to consider adopting binding rules; recommends that the European Commission and Member States use and, where possible and necessary, adapt existing instruments, to assist industry in the transition towards the new best available technology standards.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 192(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
CONTENT: this proposal is consistent with the EU 2020 Strategy and its associated flagship initiatives, notably those relating to the low carbon society roadmaps and innovation Union , as well as existing EU policies for sustainable transport.
The purpose of this proposal is to revise Directive 99/32/EC on the sulphur content of certain liquid fuels with the aim to:
(1) align the Directive with the IMO rules on fuel standards, including the standards applicable outside SECAs;
(2) align the Directive with the IMO rules on the emission abatement methods;
(3) maintain the link between the stricter fuel standards in SECAs (now requiring maximum sulphur content of marine fuel of 1.5% and from 2015 - 0.1%) and those applying for passenger ships on a regular service outside SECAs (at the moment 1.5%);
(4) strengthen EU monitoring and enforcement regime.
According to the Commission, the main advantages of the proposed Regulation are as follows:
incorporating the international fuel standards into EU law would strengthen the effectiveness of these standards as they would be monitored and enforced under the EU regime, which is more effective than the international enforcement system; extended access to and promoting the use of innovate emission abatement methods as an equivalent compliance option addresses concerns about the cost implications resulting from the new IMO rules for certain industries. This would significantly lower the IMO compliance costs (by 50% to 88%) and promote innovative industry solutions, in line with the priorities of the Europe 2020 Strategy and Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU); stricter fuel standards for passenger ships on a regular service , which operate mostly in ports or close to shore, would ensure improvement of air quality in coastal areas. The introduction of the stricter fuel standard for passenger ships would be delayed by 5 years in comparison with SECAs in order to avoid potential problems with fuel availability; lastly, strengthening EU monitoring and enforcement regime is particularly important considering that the significantly stricter fuel standards and the associated compliance costs may increase the incentives for circumvention.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: this proposal has no budgetary implication for the Union budget.
Documents
- Follow-up document: COM(2013)0475
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Final act published in Official Journal: Directive 2012/33
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 327 27.11.2012, p. 0001
- Draft final act: 00031/2012/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)665
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T7-0315/2012
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A7-0038/2012
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0151/2012
- Committee opinion: PE474.004
- Committee draft report: PE475.799
- Debate in Council: 3139
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE478.489
- Contribution: COM(2011)0439
- Contribution: COM(2011)0439
- Legislative proposal: COM(2011)0439
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)0918
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)0919
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2011)0439
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: COM(2011)0439 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)0918 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)0919 EUR-Lex
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE478.489
- Committee draft report: PE475.799
- Committee opinion: PE474.004
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0151/2012
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)665
- Draft final act: 00031/2012/LEX
- Follow-up document: COM(2013)0475 EUR-Lex
- Contribution: COM(2011)0439
- Contribution: COM(2011)0439
Activities
- Luís Paulo ALVES
Plenary Speeches (21)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- David MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (21)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Maria do Céu PATRÃO NEVES
Plenary Speeches (21)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Raül ROMEVA i RUEDA
Plenary Speeches (21)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nuno TEIXEIRA
Plenary Speeches (20)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sophie AUCONIE
Plenary Speeches (19)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (18)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Philippe BOULLAND
Plenary Speeches (16)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Edite ESTRELA
Plenary Speeches (16)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
Plenary Speeches (15)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Juozas IMBRASAS
Plenary Speeches (14)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- John BUFTON
Plenary Speeches (13)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jean-Luc MÉLENCHON
Plenary Speeches (13)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jacek WŁOSOWICZ
Plenary Speeches (13)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Elena BĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (12)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Christine DE VEYRAC
Plenary Speeches (12)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Véronique MATHIEU HOUILLON
Plenary Speeches (12)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Anne DELVAUX
Plenary Speeches (11)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Anna Maria CORAZZA BILDT
Plenary Speeches (10)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Agnès LE BRUN
Plenary Speeches (10)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Mario MAURO
Plenary Speeches (10)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Andreas MÖLZER
Plenary Speeches (10)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Angelika WERTHMANN
Plenary Speeches (10)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Iva ZANICCHI
Plenary Speeches (10)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Inês Cristina ZUBER
Plenary Speeches (10)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Regina BASTOS
Plenary Speeches (9)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Minodora CLIVETI
Plenary Speeches (9)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Viorica DĂNCILĂ
Plenary Speeches (9)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jean-Luc BENNAHMIAS
Plenary Speeches (8)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nora BERRA
Plenary Speeches (8)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sebastian Valentin BODU
Plenary Speeches (8)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Giovanni LA VIA
Plenary Speeches (8)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Radvilė MORKŪNAITĖ-MIKULĖNIENĖ
Plenary Speeches (8)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marie-Christine VERGIAT
Plenary Speeches (8)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ashley FOX
Plenary Speeches (7)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (7)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Justas Vincas PALECKIS
Plenary Speeches (7)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Vito BONSIGNORE
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Petru Constantin LUHAN
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Robert ROCHEFORT
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marie-Thérèse SANCHEZ-SCHMID
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Elena Oana ANTONESCU
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Erik BÁNKI
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Mário DAVID
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Gunnar HÖKMARK
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Anna IBRISAGIC
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Constance LE GRIP
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Barbara MATERA
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Norica NICOLAI
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Licia RONZULLI
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nikolaos SALAVRAKOS
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Tadeusz CYMAŃSKI
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marielle DE SARNEZ
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Christofer FJELLNER
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nathalie GRIESBECK
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Michał Tomasz KAMIŃSKI
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Iosif MATULA
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Willy MEYER
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Georgios PAPANIKOLAOU
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Mitro REPO
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Oreste ROSSI
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alf SVENSSON
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Derek VAUGHAN
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Dominique VLASTO
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Roberta ANGELILLI
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Pino ARLACCHI
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Raffaele BALDASSARRE
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Antonio CANCIAN
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alain CADEC
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Andrea ČEŠKOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Elisabetta GARDINI
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Françoise GROSSETÊTE
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Satu HASSI
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Syed KAMALL
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sergej KOZLÍK
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Astrid LULLING
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Erminia MAZZONI
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Rareș-Lucian NICULESCU
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alfredo PALLONE
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Crescenzio RIVELLINI
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Amalia SARTORI
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Joanna SENYSZYN
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Niki TZAVELA
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Thomas ULMER
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marita ULVSKOG
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Dame Glenis WILLMOTT
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marina YANNAKOUDAKIS
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Janusz ZEMKE
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alfredo ANTONIOZZI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Zoltán BAGÓ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Arkadiusz Tomasz BRATKOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Françoise CASTEX
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nikolaos CHOUNTIS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Emer COSTELLO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Francesco DE ANGELIS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ioan ENCIU
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Göran FÄRM
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Louis GRECH
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Mathieu GROSCH
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Anna HEDH
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Philippe JUVIN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Eija-Riitta KORHOLA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Olle LUDVIGSSON
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Edward MCMILLAN-SCOTT
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Paul MURPHY
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Cristiana MUSCARDINI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sławomir NITRAS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jens NILSSON
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Siiri OVIIR
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alojz PETERLE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Matteo SALVINI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Daciana Octavia SÂRBU
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Vilja SAVISAAR-TOOMAST
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sergio Paolo Francesco SILVESTRIS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Georgios STAVRAKAKIS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Isabelle THOMAS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Oldřich VLASÁK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- Jarosław WAŁĘSA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Åsa WESTLUND
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Andrea ZANONI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Zbigniew ZIOBRO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Charalampos ANGOURAKIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Liam AYLWARD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Pilar AYUSO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- Paolo BARTOLOZZI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bendt BENDTSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- Ivo BELET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Zuzana BRZOBOHATÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ole CHRISTENSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Luigi Ciriaco DE MITA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jacqueline FOSTER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- Lorenzo FONTANA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Adam GIEREK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Lidia Joanna GERINGER DE OEDENBERG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Robert GOEBBELS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Catherine GRÈZE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marek Józef GRÓBARCZYK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Matthias GROOTE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- Mikael GUSTAFSSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Małgorzata HANDZLIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Salvatore IACOLINO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Cătălin Sorin IVAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Liisa JAAKONSAARI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Kent JOHANSSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Dan JØRGENSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Karin KADENBACH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- Tunne KELAM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Timothy KIRKHOPE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Georgios KOUMOUTSAKOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- Jan KOZŁOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Holger KRAHMER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- Werner KUHN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- Monica MACOVEI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bogdan Kazimierz MARCINKIEWICZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alajos MÉSZÁROS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Gay MITCHELL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Vital MOREIRA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Claudio MORGANTI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Tiziano MOTTI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Krisztina MORVAI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Wojciech Michał OLEJNICZAK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Riikka PAKARINEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- Pier Antonio PANZERI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Mario PIRILLO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Teresa RIERA MADURELL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Kārlis ŠADURSKIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Tokia SAÏFI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Carl SCHLYTER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- Richard SEEBER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- Olga SEHNALOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Csaba SÓGOR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Søren Bo SØNDERGAARD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bogusław SONIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- Francisco SOSA WAGNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Hannu TAKKULA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Rebecca TAYLOR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sampo TERHO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- Britta THOMSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Gino TREMATERRA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sabine WILS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)
- Hermann WINKLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Anna ZÁBORSKÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
Votes
A7-0038/2012 - Satu Hassi - Résolution législative #
Amendments | Dossier |
286 |
2011/0190(COD)
2011/11/30
TRAN
100 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 9 – point (a) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b) b) sampling and analysis of the sulphur content of marine fuel for onboard combustion
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 10 – point (a) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. Each year, by 30 June, the Member States shall
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 10 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 7 – paragraphs 2 and 3 (c) paragraph
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 10 – point ca (new) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 7 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. In the context of the review of the EU air quality legislation planned for 2013, the Commission shall submit a report and, if appropriate, a proposal for a comprehensive quality standards for marine fuel oil including specifications on acidic and corrosive substances, ash content, aluminium, silicon and other metals such as iron and nickel.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 10 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 7 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. By 1 January 2013, the European Commission shall submit an extensive survey of the impact of the introduction of this legislation, particularly with regard to a possible modal switch from water to land transport. This shall also include an investigation of the impact of introducing the 0.1% sulphur standard for all European seas. If this survey shows that water transport is being replaced by land transport, the European Commission shall submit an alternative legislative proposal which does not entail any switch from water to land transport.
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 10 – point c a (new) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 7 – paragraph 3a (new) ca) the following paragraph 3a is inserted 3a. By 31 December 2015, the Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the observed trends in air quality (both concentrations, exposure, and deposition of air pollutants) and in particular in shipping emissions of SO2, NOx and PM (including black carbon). The Commission may consider submitting proposals to revise the sulphur limit values laid down for each fuel category, as well as proposals aimed at reducing other air pollutants by sea-going ships or at introducing emission charges for air pollution in Europe, provided that environmental and health benefits can be clearly demonstrated.
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 10 - point c b (new) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 7 – paragraph 3 b (new) (cb) the following paragraph 3a is inserted 3b. If the International Maritime Organisation decides before 1 January 2015 to amend Annex XI to the MARPOL Convention, the European Commission shall automatically submit a new proposal to incorporate this amendment into European law.
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 10 – point c c (new) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 7 – paragraph 3c (new) 3b. By 31 December 2015 at the latest, the Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the possible adoption of comprehensive quality standard for marine fuel oil, including full specifications for marine fuel oils such as, inter alia, ash content, aluminium and silicon, other metals (iron, nickel and other metals), acidic and corrosive substances and chemicals. In the context of the review of the EU air quality legislation planned for 2013, the Commission should consider submitting a proposal for a comprehensive fuel quality standard for marine fuel oil as a complementary measure to this Directive, provided that safety, environmental and health benefits can be clearly demonstrated.
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 13 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 9a– paragraph 5 5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Articles 4a(1a) and (2), 4c(4), 6(1), 7(1a) and 7(4) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 2 – point 1 a (new) Directive 1999/32/EC Annex 1a. The timeframe for transposition at EU level must mirror the timeframe and limits already agreed by the Member States at the International Maritime Organization.
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Recital 1 a (new) (1a) Acidification still remains a widespread problem in Europe. Significant European regions still remain particularly sensitive to acidification issues and the EU has not yet reached its objectives regarding critical loads and levels.
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Annex Directive 1999/32/EC Annex 2– paragraph 2 – point 2 d
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Annex Directive 1999/32/EC Annex 2 – paragraph 2 – point 2 – document thoroughly, by compliance with the wash water requirements in IMO Resolution MEPC.184(59), that any waste streams discharged into the sea, including enclosed ports, harbours and estuaries have no significant negative impacts on and do not pose risks to human health and the environment.“
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 2 a (new) (3a) Air pollution caused by ships at berth, in particular by cruise ships, is a major concern for harbour cities regarding their efforts to meet the EU’s air quality limit values for particulate matter and NO2.
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 3 a (new) (3a) Air pollution from ships at berth, and in particular from cruise ships, is a particular concern for harbour cities. As the electricity needs of ships at berth are usually met with the help of auxiliary engines, Member States should support the development of shore-side electricity provision.
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 3 b (new) (3b) While emissions from land-based sources have been reduced, air pollution from shipping is projected to dramatically increase. Without further action, SOx and NOx emissions from shipping would therefore be higher than emissions from all land-based sources around 2020.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 4 (4) According to Directive 1999/32/EC the Commission is to report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of the Directive and to table any proposals for amendments, in particular as regards the reduction of sulphur limits for marine fuel in SOx Emission Control Areas (SECAs),
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 4 a (new) (4a) While this Directive aims to reduce emissions from secondary particulate matter (PM), the Commission should complement its efforts to address air pollution from shipping by investigating measures to reduce ship emissions of primary particulate matter, including their abatement efficiencies, costs, benefits, and potential to reduce also black carbon (BC). After a review of available emission control measures for primary PM and BC, the Commission should, if appropriate, come forward with proposals for PM/BC emission standards for ships.
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 4 a (new) (4a) It is also important that the Commission assess the consequences of ensuring compliance by the sector on the basis of reports drawn up by the Member States, in order to permit the upstream planning of appropriate accompanying measures, particularly by carrying out studies on the availability of fuels, their prices, the risks of a retrograde modal switch and the impact of the measures of this directive on all economic operators in the maritime transport sector. The results of this study would make it possible to clarify the Commission’s proposals on the deployment of its toolbox in practice and the implementation of the arrangements for sustainable water transport.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 4 b (new) Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 4 c (new) (4c) Some SOx abatement methods can generate waste, in particular wastewater containing mercury, selenium, and other trace elements that may necessitate treatment of the wastewater before discharge. The Commission should adopt guidelines for the harmonised development of reception facilities in EU ports.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Recital 6 (6) The revised Annex VI to MARPOL introduces, inter alia, stricter sulphur limits for marine fuel in SECAs (1.00% as of 1 July 2010 and 0.10% as of 1 January 2015)
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 6 (6) The revised Annex VI to MARPOL introduces, inter alia, stricter sulphur limits
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 6 a (new) (6a) In view of the health benefits of lower sulphur emissions, the Commission should propose a fixed timetable for the extension of the 0.1% limit to all seas bordering Member States' landmass or for the extension of this limit so as to cover a fixed distance from the Union coastline.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 6 a (new) (6a) In view of the health benefits of lower sulphur emissions the European Commission should, insofar as it can, promote the extension of the 0.1% limit to other seas bordering on Member States’ landmass or extending this limit so as to cover a fixed distance from the Union coastline.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 6 a (new) Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 6 a (new) (6a) The sulphur content of fuel is only one of the indicators used to determine the quality of fuel. The European Union should adopt a more comprehensive and detailed set of specifications to really identify the quality of fuel in the maritime sector.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 7 (7) Passenger ships operate mostly in ports or close to coastal areas and their impacts on human health and the environment are significant. Those ships are required to use marine fuel with the same maximum sulphur content as is applicable in SECAs (1.5%). Given that stricter sulphur standards will apply in SECAs, it is justified by the need to improve air quality around ports and coasts in the non-SECA territories that the same standards apply to passenger ships. However, the introduction of a new SECA standard for passenger ships would be delayed by
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 7 (7) Passenger ships operate mostly in ports or close to coastal areas and their impacts on human health and the environment are significant. Those ships are required to use marine fuel with the same maximum sulphur content as is applicable in SECAs (1.5%). Given that stricter sulphur standards will apply in SECAs, it is justified by the need to improve air quality around ports and coasts in the non-SECA territories that the same standards apply to
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 7 (7) Passenger ships operate mostly in ports or close to coastal areas and their impacts on human health and the environment are significant. Those ships are required to use marine fuel with the same maximum sulphur content as is applicable in SECAs (1.5%). Given that stricter sulphur standards will apply in SECAs, it is justified by the need to improve air quality around ports and coasts in the non-SECA territories that the same standards apply to passenger ships.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 7 (7) Passenger ships operate mostly in ports or close to coastal areas and their impacts on human health and the environment are significant. Those ships are required to use marine fuel with the same maximum sulphur content as is applicable in SECAs (1.5%). Given that stricter sulphur standards will apply in SECAs, it is justified by the need to improve air quality around ports and coasts in the non-SECA territories that the same standards apply to passenger ships.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 7 a (new) (7a) In order to ensure that the air quality and health benefits can be enjoyed by the Member States whose coasts are not part of SECAs, and to establish a minimum level playing field for the sector across the Union, the same fuel quality requirement should be extended to the territorial seas of Member States and to pollution control areas outside SECAs.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Recital 11 (11) Complying with the low fuel sulphur limits, particularly in SECAs,
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Recital 11 a (new) (11a) In this connection, if it is proven that transport has switched from sea to land-based modes, particularly in Member States adjoining SECAs, the European Commission should use all existing instruments, such as the Marco Polo programme, to prevent a switch to more environmentally damaging land-based modes.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 11 a (new) (11a) In order to maintain the competitiveness of maritime transport while improving its environmental performance, the Commission should impose economic and financial measures to support environmental maritime technologies (scrubbers, substitute fuels etc) and an environmental infrastructure. Special measures should be applied in SECAs and additional funds should be granted to guarantee compliance with fuel standards.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 11 a (new) (11α) Modal backshift is a major problem for areas highly dependent on marine transport. The Commission must make full use of available resources, such as Marco Polo and transport TENs, so as to provide assistance specifically designed to minimise the risk of modal backshift.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 12 a (new) (12a) Union legislation on the internalisation of external costs has been introduced for other transport modes, notably in the Eurovignette Directive, and is envisaged for all other transport modes in the coming years. The present introduction of reduced sulphur emissions will help to prepare the maritime sector in reducing its considerable external costs. The development of comprehensive quality standards for marine fuel oil, including specifications on acidic and corrosive substances, ash content, aluminium, silicon and other metals such as iron and nickel, would further aid the sector in this regard.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Recital 12 a (new) (12a) Until 2018, undertakings providing regular services which can show that more than 85% of their operations per annum take place in a SECA should be able to apply for support for the use of low-sulphur fuels. It should only be possible for this support to be granted if the applicant shows that, through no fault of his own, the required technological emission reduction procedures cannot be in operation by the deadline of 1 January 2015. In addition, the applicant should show that, in the run-up to the introduction of the more stringent SECA limit values in 2015, serious efforts were made before 1 January 2013 to acquire emission reduction technologies which would have had at least the same positive impact on the environment as can be achieved by using low-sulphur fuels.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 12 a (new) (12a) The use of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) virtually eliminates sulphur emissions. A new code for LNG-fuelled ships is expected to be introduced in 2014 together with the next revision of the Safety Of Life At Sea (SOLAS) Convention. Member States should pay particular attention to the need to ensure the safety and availability, as well as safe bunkering operations, of LNG powered ships while preventing the revised SOLAS Convention from creating unnecessary barriers to the use of this fuel.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 12 a (new) (12a) Member States may, as an alternative solution for cutting emissions, facilitate the use by docked vessels of onshore power supply systems instead of shipboard generated power.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 12 a (new) (12a) Member States should ensure that compliant fuel is available and distributed in a balanced manner in accordance with Regulation 18 of the revised Annex VI to MARPOL. In the event that compliant fuel might not be available in some ports (e.g. lacking in the physical distribution of compliant fuel), the ship should be permitted to invoke the exemption as foreseen under MARPOL Annex VI Regulation 18.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 12 b (new) (12b) Slow steaming is a cost-efficient way to reduce fuel consumption. The Commission should therefore consider setting speed limits for ships as a measure to help offset some of the costs associated with meeting these sulphur limits.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 12 b (new) (12b) Member States should ensure that compliant fuel in accordance with Regulation 18 of the revised Annex VI to MARPOL is available and distributed in a balanced manner. In the event that compliant fuel might not be available in some ports, the ship should be permitted to invoke the exemption as foreseen under MARPOL Annex VI Regulation 18. The ship should not be required to deviate from its intended voyage or to delay unduly the voyage in order to achieve compliance.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 12 b (new) (12b) Given the costs of implementing new requirements regarding the use of low-sulphur fuel and the potential risk of modal transfers, it is necessary to introduce funding programmes for the implementation of these measures, so as to avoid restricting the competitiveness of maritime transport to the detriment of other types of transport.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 12 c (new) (12c) The reduction of external costs in transport and the 20-20-20 climate goals are an explicit aim of the Union. The Commission should support this thrust with further proposals to introduce economic instruments to support the cost effectiveness of internalisation.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive- amending act Recital 12 d (new) (12d) Some types of SOx abatement methods generate waste and wastewater containing mercury, selenium and other trace element which require treatment before discharge. The Commission should adopt guidelines for the harmonised development of reception facilities in EU ports.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Recital 12 e (new) (12e) The Commission's objective in the present proposal to limit sulphur emissions is to align the Directive with the IMO rules on fuel standards. The Commission should make further proposals to set NOx emission engine standards, particularly as they are already contained in the MARPOL VI agreement of the IMO.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Recital 12 f (new) (12f) Member States should be encouraged to provide support for the introduction of scrubber technology and ensure fuel availability.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Recital 13 (13) In order
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Recital 14 a (new) (14a) The importance of improving environmental standards with regard to the reduction of sulphur emissions in the European Union should be emphasized. However any legislative change at the EU-level must respect decisions already taken at an international level. Any proposal that goes beyond previously agreed standards is a matter for Member States. The appropriate forum for such decisions is the International Maritime Organization.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Recital 14 a (new) (14a) In order to prevent transport from being switched from water to land, the Commission must deploy European funds such as Marco Polo as widely as possible to promote water transport and encourage the use of low-sulphur LNG as a maritime fuel. Member States should contribute to this trend by making fiscal facilities available for ship owners who invest in the use of LNG and for ship owners who invest in the development and use of scrubbers.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 2 – point (b) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 2 – point 3 m '3m. emission abatement method means any fitting, material, appliance or apparatus to be fitted in a ship or other procedure, alternative fuel, or compliance method, used as an alternative to low sulphur marine fuel meeting the requirements set out in this Directive
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 4 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 3a Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 4 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 3a Member States shall ensure that marine fuels are not used
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 4 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 3a Member States shall ensure that marine fuels are not used
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 4 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 3a Member States shall ensure that, from 31 December 2018, marine fuels are not used or placed on the market within their territory if their sulphur content exceeds 3.5 % by mass unless this fuel is used on vessels which have installed technical systems which prevent the maximum emission values laid down in Annex 1 from being exceeded.'
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point (a) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4a – title Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point (a) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4a – title 'Maximum sulphur content of marine fuels used in territorial seas, exclusive economic zones and pollution control zones of Member States, including SOx Emission Control Areas and by passenger ships operating
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 - point (a) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4a – title 'Maximum sulphur content of marine fuels used in territorial seas, exclusive economic zones and pollution control zones of Member States, including SOx Emission Control Areas and by passenger ships
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point (c) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4a – paragraph 1a – last subparagraph Until 2018, in order to be able to comply with the limit values laid down in subparagraph (b) of this paragraph, undertakings providing regular services which can show that more than 85% of their operations per annum take place in a SECA should be able to apply for support for the use of low-sulphur fuels. It should only be possible for this support to be granted if the applicant shows that, through no fault of his own, the required technological emission reduction procedures cannot be in operation by the deadline of 1 January 2015. In addition, the applicant should show that, in the run-up to the introduction of the more stringent SECA limit values in 2015, serious efforts were made before 1 January 2013 to acquire emission reduction technologies which would have had at least the same positive impact on the environment as can be achieved by using low-sulphur fuels. This paragraph shall apply to all vessels of all flags, including vessels whose journey began outside the Union.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point (c) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4a – paragraph 1a – last subparagraph This paragraph shall apply to all vessels of all flags, including vessels whose journey began outside the Union. Vessels operating in short sea shipping shall be excluded from the arrangement referred to in (b). The arrangement referred to in (a) shall continue to apply to them for a transitional period of five years. If it should prove necessary for the purposes of the application of this exception, EU Member States are expected to create the legal preconditions for it at the IMO.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point (c) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4a – paragraph 1 – last subparagraph This paragraph shall apply to all vessels of all flags, including vessels whose journey began outside the Union
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point (c) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 – last subparagraph This paragraph shall apply to all vessels of all flags, including vessels whose journey began outside the Union, except for vessels exempted under Annex VI of MARPOL'.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point b Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4a – paragraph 1 '1. Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure that marine fuels are not used in the areas of their territorial seas, exclusive economic zones and pollution control zones falling within SOx Emission Control Areas and in their territorial waters which do not fall within SOx Emission Control Areas if the sulphur content of those fuels by mass exceeds:
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point (c) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4a – paragraph 1a – introductory part '1. Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure that marine fuels are not used in the areas of their territorial seas, exclusive economic zones and pollution control zones falling outside SOx Emission Control Areas if the sulphur content of those fuels by mass exceeds:
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point (c) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4a – paragraph 1a – point (a) (a)
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point (c) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4a – paragraph 1a – point (b) (b) 0.50 % as from 1 January 2020 or 2025.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point (c) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4a – paragraph 1a – point (b) b) 0.50% as from 1 January 2020, or as from 1 January 2025, depending on the IMO’s decision following its assessment of the availability of marine fuels to comply with the maximum sulphur content of 0.50% by mass, referred to in Regulation 14(8) of Annex VI of the MARPOL Convention.
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point (c) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4a – paragraph 1a – point b (b) 0.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point (c) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4a – paragraph 1a – point (b) (b) 0.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point (c) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4a – paragraph 1a – subparagraph 2 Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point (c) Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point (c) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4a – paragraph 1a – subparagraph 2 The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with the decision of the IMO and of Article 9a of this Directive concerning the date from which the sulphur standard laid down in point (b) of this paragraph applies.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point (c) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4a – paragraph 1a '1 a. Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure that marine fuels are not used in the
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point (d) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4a – paragraph 2 The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 9a of this Directive concerning the designation of sea areas as SOx Emission Control Areas on the basis of the decision of the IMO in accordance with Regulation 14(3)(2) of Annex VI to MARPOL.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point (d) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4a – paragraph 1a – subparagraph 2 'The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 9a of this Directive concerning the
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point (e) ‘(4) Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure that marine fuels are not used in their territorial seas, exclusive economic zones and pollution control zones falling outside SOx Emission Control Areas by passenger ships operating
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point (e) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4a – paragraph 4 -introductory wording 4. Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure that marine fuels are not used in their territorial seas, exclusive economic zones and pollution control zones falling outside SOx Emission Control Areas by passenger ships
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point (e) Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point (e) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 4 – point (d) Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point (e) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4a – paragraph 4 – point (d) (d) 0.10 % as from 1 January 20
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point (e) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4a – paragraph 4 – point (d) (d) 0.10 % as from 1 January 20
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point (e) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4a – paragraph 4 – point (d) (d) 0.10 % as from 1 January 20
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 – point (e) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 5 5. Member States shall require the correct completion of ships' logbooks, including fuel-changeover operations, a
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 6 da) permit a ship that does not comply with the provisions of this Directive to benefit from the measures under paragraphs 2.2. and 2.3 of Regulation18, if the conditions listed in paragraph 2.1 are met;
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/E Article 4b – paragraph 2 – point (a) Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4b – paragraph 2 – point (a) Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4b – paragraph 3 Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4b – paragraph 3 Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4b – paragraph 3a (new) 3a. The Administration of a Member State may allow any fitting, material, appliance or apparatus to be fitted in a ship or other procedures, alternative fuel oils, or compliance methods used as an alternative to that required by this Directive if such fitting, material, appliance or apparatus or other procedures, alternative fuel oils, or compliance methods are at least as effective in terms of emission reductions as that required by this Directive, including any of the standards set forth in Articles 4a and 4b.
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4ba (new) Article 4ba Availability of marine fuels Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure the balanced availability and distribution of marine fuels.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4ba (new) Article 4ba Availability of marine fuels 1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that marine fuels are available and distributed in a balanced manner: - where the sulphur content does not exceed 0.1% as from 1 January 2015; - where the sulphur content does not exceed 0.5% as from 1 January 2020. 2. Paragraph 1 shall not preclude the introduction of such measures from an earlier date.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 c – point 2 2. Ships using the emission abatement methods referred to in paragraph 1 shall
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 7 (new) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4c, paragraph 2a (new) (2a) Member States shall, as an alternative solution for reducing emissions, encourage the use by docked vessels of onshore power supply systems.
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 c – paragraph 3 3. The emission abatement methods referred to in paragraph 1 shall comply with the criteria specified in the instruments referred to in Annex 2.1, unless superseded
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4c – paragraph 3a (new) 3a. Member States shall ensure that port authorities include in the harbour fee or other charges any costs of reception, handling and disposal of effluents from exhaust gas cleaning systems in accordance with the Port Reception Facilities Directive 2000/59/EC.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 c – paragraph 4 – introductory wording Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 c – paragraph 4 – final subparagraph The Commission shall also take into account
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 1 – point 8a (new) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4e a (new) Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 8 a (new) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4e a (new) source: PE-476.142
2011/12/16
ENVI
186 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 1999/32/EC Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) for combustion in refineries, where the monthly average of emissions of sulphur dioxide averaged over all combustion plants in the refinery, irrespective of the type of fuel or fuel combination used, but excluding plants falling under point (a), gas turbines and gas engines, do not exceed
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 1999/32/EC Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that any combustion plant using heavy fuel oil with a sulphur concentration greater than that referred to in paragraph 1 is not operated without a permit issued
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 4 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 3 a Member States shall ensure that marine fuels are not used or placed on the market within their territory if their sulphur content exceeds 3.5 % by mass, except for fuels intended for supply to ships using the emission abatement methods referred to in Article 4c.
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 4 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 3 a Member States shall ensure that marine fuels are not used
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 4 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 3 a Member States shall ensure that marine fuels are not used
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 4 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 3 a Member States shall ensure that marine fuels are not used
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point a Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – title Maximum sulphur content of marine fuels used in territorial seas, exclusive economic zones and pollution control zones of Member States, including SOx Emission Control Areas and by passenger ships operating
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point b (a) 1.00
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point b Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point b Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) 0.10
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point b Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) 0.10% as from 1 January 20
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point b Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) 0.
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point b Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) 0.10 % by mass as from 1 January 2020.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point b Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point b Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 This paragraph shall apply to all vessels of all flags, including vessels whose journey began outside the Union with the exception of ships which are granted an exemption from the requirements under Annex VI to MARPOL. This exemption may be granted on a one- time basis for a limited time only and shall not be extended beyond 31 December 2019.
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 This paragraph shall apply to all vessels of all flags, including vessels whose journey began outside the Union with the exception of ships that are granted an exemption from the requirements under Annex VI to MARPOL.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point b Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 This paragraph shall apply to all vessels of all flags, including vessels whose journey began outside the Union, in accordance with the exemption mechanisms contained in Annex VI of MARPOL.
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point b Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 This paragraph shall apply to all vessels of all flags, including vessels whose journey began outside the Union. Vessels operating in short sea shipping shall be excluded from the arrangement referred to in (b). The arrangement referred to in (a) shall continue to apply to them for a transitional period of five years. If it should prove necessary for the purposes of the application of this exception, EU Member States are expected to create the legal preconditions for it at the IMO.
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point b Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new) A transitional period can be allowed in SECAs if there is no guaranteed availability of low-sulphur maritime fuel (sulphur content 0.10%) at a competitive cost and if there are no appropriate, economically feasible and tested emission cleaning methods available. The transitional period may last until 31 December 2019. During the transitional period the sulphur content of fuel can be a maximum of 1.00%. This paragraph may be reviewed, and if needed revised, in the light of any possible future change in Regulation 14(4) of Annex VI to MARPOL.
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point b Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new) Member States may adopt financial measures in favour of sectors or subsectors determined to be exposed to a risk of economic hardship due to the implementation of the requirements set out in Article 4a(1)(b) and to compensate for the costs of implementing those requirements. The Commission shall adopt at the latest by the end of 2013 guidance on applicable state aid rules to be followed in this regard.
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point c Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1a – introductory part Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure that marine fuels are not used in the areas of their territorial seas, exclusive economic zones and pollution control zones falling outside SOx Emission Control Areas if the sulphur content of those fuels by mass exceeds:
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point c Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) 0.50 % as from 1 January 20
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point c Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) 0.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point c Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) 0.50
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point c Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) 0.50
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point c Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) 0.50
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point c Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) 0.50
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point c Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) 0.10 % by mass as from 1 January 2020.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point c Directive 1999/32/EG Article 4 a – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 2 Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point c Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 2 Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point c Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 2 The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 9a of this Directive concerning the date from which the sulphur standard laid down in point (b) of this paragraph applies.
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point c Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 2 The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 9a of this Directive concerning the
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point c Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 2 The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with the decision of the IMO and with Article 9a of this Directive concerning the date from which the sulphur standard laid down in point (b) of this paragraph applies.
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point c Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 2 The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 9a of this Directive concerning the date from which the sulphur standard laid down in point (b) of this paragraph applies.
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point d Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point d Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 2 The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 9a of this Directive concerning the designation of sea areas as SOx Emission Control Areas
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point d Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 2 The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 9a of this Directive concerning the designation of sea areas as SOx Emission Control Areas on the basis of the decision of the IMO in accordance with Regulation 14(3)(2) of Annex VI to MARPOL. The introduction of any new Emission Control Areas shall be subject to the IMO process under Annex VI to MARPOL and be underpinned by a well-founded case based on the IMO criteria and on environmental and economic grounds and supported by scientific data.
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point d The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 9a of this Directive concerning the designation of sea areas as SOx Emission Control Areas on the basis of the decision of the IMO in accordance with Regulation 14(3)(2) of Annex VI to MARPOL. The introduction of any new SECA should be debated on the basis of scientific data regarding its environmental and economic impact and only after its introduction has been examined and approved through the relevant IMO process.
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point d Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 2 'The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 9a of this Directive concerning the
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point d a (new) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 3 (da) paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: „3. Member States shall be responsible for the enforcement of paragraphs 1, 1a and 4 at least in respect of: – vessels flying their flag, and – vessels of all flags while in Union ports. Enforcement inspections shall be carried out at sufficient frequency so that at least 5% of all vessels calling at the ports of Member States are controlled once every three years. Member States may also take additional enforcement action in respect of other vessels in accordance with international maritime law.”
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point e Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure that marine fuels are not used in their territorial seas, exclusive economic zones and pollution control zones falling outside SOx Emission Control Areas by passenger ships operating on regular services to or from any Union port if the sulphur content of those fuels by mass exceeds: (c) 1.5
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point e Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure that marine fuels are not used in their territorial seas, exclusive economic zones and pollution control zones falling outside SOx Emission Control Areas by passenger ships
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point e Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4a – paragraph 4 – point c a (new) (ca) 0.50 % as from 1 January 2015;
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point e Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 4 – point d Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point e Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 4 – point d (d) 0.
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point e Directive 1999/32/EG Article 4 a – paragraph 4 – point d (d) 0.10 % as from 1 January 20
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point e Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 4 – point d (d) 0.
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point e Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 4 – point d (d) 1% as from 1 January 2015. 0.5% as from 1 January 2020. On the basis of a holistic, in-depth impact assessment, the Commission shall submit, no later than 1 January 2018, a proposal seeking to reduce this content to 0.1
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point e Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 4 – point d (d) 0.10
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point e Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 4 – point d (d) 0.
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point e a (new) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 4 a (new) ea. the following paragraph 4a is added: 4a. Notwithstanding Articles 3 and 4, a ship shall not be obliged to change its voyage plan (route, schedule) to achieve compliance. A ship shall notify the competent authorities of the next Union port of call and its own administration, if it cannot obtain compliant fuel. The authorities concerned shall inform the Commission. A ship shall demonstrate, by of way of documentation, that it has attempted to achieve compliance but was unable to obtain compliant fuels, for example, by providing evidence of placed or attempted fuel orders. Such documentation shall be considered in the enforcement of this Directive. A Member State may desist from control measures if the ship can document that it attempted to obtain in good faith compliant fuel.
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point e Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. In the event of non-compliance with the limits set in paragraphs 1, 1a and 4, and after examination of all pieces of evidence, authorities exercising Port State Control shall be empowered to detain the ship until the violation situation has been rectified. Non-compliant vessels shall be required to de-bunker and be subject to a penalty of up to €25,000 for each violation per day. Member States may also take additional enforcement action in accordance with international maritime law.
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point e Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. By way of derogation from paragraph 4, for Spain, for the Canary Islands, France, for the French Overseas Departments, Greece, for the whole or part of its territory, and Portugal, for the archipelagos of Madeira and Azores, the sulphur content of these fuels by mass shall not exceed: - 0,10 as from 1 January 2025
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point e Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure that marine fuels are not used in their territorial seas, exclusive economic zones and pollution control zones falling outside SOx Emission Control Areas by ships to or from any Union port if the sulphur content of those fuels by mass exceeds: (a) 1.5%; (b) 0.50% as from 1 January 2015 (c) 0.10% as from 1 January 2020. This paragraph shall apply to all vessels of all flags, including vessels whose journey began outside the Union.
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point e Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 5 5. Member States shall require the correct completion of ships' logbooks, including fuel-changeover operations, a
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point e Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 6 – point d a (new) (da) permit a ship that does not comply with the provisions of this Directive to benefit from the measures under paragraphs 2.2. and 2.3 of Regulation18, if the conditions listed in paragraph 2.1 are met;
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 a (new) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a a (new) Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 b – paragraph 2 – point a Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 b – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that marine gas oils are not placed on the market in their territory if the sulphur content of those marine gas oils exceeds 0.
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 b – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) As from 1 January 2015, Member States shall take all necessary steps to align the sulphur content of marine fuels used by ships on inland waterways, in the territorial seas of the Union or by any ships at berth in Union ports with the values contained in Article 4(2) of the Directive 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1998 relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels and amending Council Directive 93/12/EEC.
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 b – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The power to adopt delegated acts shall be conferred on the Commission under Article 9a for up to six months after entry into force of this directive, enabling it to provide for the eventuality of there being no fuel available at a reasonable economic and environmental cost in the Member State where travel is taking place.
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 b a (new) Article 4ba Availability of marine fuels 1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure the availability and balanced distribution of marine fuels: - where the sulphur content does not exceed 0.5 % as from 1 January 2015; - where the sulphur content does not exceed 0.1 % as from 1 January 2020 2. Paragraph 1 shall not preclude the introduction of such measures from an earlier date.
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 b a (new) Article 4ba Equivalents The administration of a Member State may allow any fitting, material, appliance or apparatus to be fitted in a ship or other procedures, alternative fuel oils, or compliance methods used as an alternative to that required by this Directive if such fitting, material, appliance or apparatus or other procedures, alternative fuel oils, or compliance methods are at least as effective in terms of emissions reductions as that required by this Directive, including any of the standards laid down in Articles 4a and 4b.
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 c – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall allow the use of emission abatement methods by ships of all flags in their ports, territorial seas, exclusive economic zones and pollution control zones, as an alternative to using marine fuels that meet the requirements of Articles 3a, 4a and 4b, subject to the provisions of paragraphs 2 and 3.
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 c – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall allow the use of emission abatement methods by ships of all flags in their ports, territorial seas, exclusive economic zones and pollution control zones, as an alternative to using marine fuels that meet the requirements of Articles 3a, 4a and 4b, subject to the provisions of paragraphs 2 and 3.
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 c – paragraph 2 2. Ships using the emission abatement methods referred to in paragraph 1 shall
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 c – paragraph 2 2. Ships using the emission abatement methods referred to in paragraph 1 shall
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 c – paragraph 2 2. Ships using the emission abatement methods referred to in paragraph 1 shall con
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 c – paragraph 2 2. Ships using the emission abatement methods referred to in paragraph 1 shall
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 c – paragraph 2 2. Ships using the emission abatement methods referred to in paragraph 1 shall con
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 c – paragraph 3 3. The emission abatement methods referred to in paragraph 1 shall comply with the criteria specified in the instruments referred to in Annex 2.1, unless superseded
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 3. The emission abatement methods referred to in paragraph 1 shall comply with the criteria specified in the instruments referred to in Annex 2.1, unless superseded
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 c – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Member State support for the installation of on-board exhaust gas cleaning systems that are ordered before 31.12.2013 shall be considered compatible with the internal market within the meaning of Article 107 of the TFEU.
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The Commission shall be empowered to
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 9a and with the relevant instruments and standards adopted by the IMO concerning:
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 The Commission shall
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 The Commission shall also take into account
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 The Commission shall take into account, inter alia, scientific and technological progress
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 8 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 d – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (da) the possibility of using alternative compliance methods in a cost-effective way, while respecting the limits set by this Directive. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 9a, concerning the issuance of guidelines 6 months after the entry into force of this Directive, that will clarify which alternative compliance methods can be adopted by ships throughout the Union.
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 8 a (new) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 e a (new) (8a) The following Article 4ea shall be inserted: „Article 4ea Fuel oil availability Notwithstanding the provisions laid down is Article 3 and Article 4: 1. If a ship is found by a Member State not to be in compliance with the standards for compliant fuel oils set out in this Directive, the competent authority of the Member State may require the ship to: (a) present a record of the actions taken to attempt to achieve compliance; and (b) provide evidence that it attempted to purchase compliant fuel oil in accordance with its voyage plan and, if it was not made available where planned, that attempts were made to locate alternative sources for such fuel oil and that despite best efforts to obtain compliant fuel oil, no such fuel oil was made available for purchase. 2. The ship shall not be required to deviate from its intended voyage or to delay unduly the voyage in order to achieve compliance. 3. If a ship provides the information set out in paragraph 1, Member States will take into account all relevant circumstances and the evidence presented to determine the appropriate action to take, including not taking any control measures. 4. A ship shall notify its administration and the competent authority of the relevant port of destination when it cannot purchase compliant fuel oil. 5. Member States shall notify the Commission when a ship has presented evidence of the non-availability of compliant fuel oil. 6. The Commission, shall, upon notification of unavailable fuel in a particular port, take any relevant measures to ensure that the port concerned is compliant with the aims of this Directive.”
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 8 a (new) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 e a (new) (8a) The following Article 4ea shall be inserted: „Article 4ea Fuel oil availability Notwithstanding the provisions contained in Articles 3 and Article 4: If a ship is found by a Member State not to be in compliance with the standards for compliant fuel oils set out in this Directive, the competent authority of the Member State may require the ship to: (a) present a record of the actions taken to attempt to achieve compliance; and (b) provide evidence that it attempted to purchase compliant fuel oil in accordance with its voyage plan and, if it was not made available where planned, that attempts were made to locate alternative sources for such fuel oil and that despite best efforts to obtain compliant fuel oil, no such fuel oil was made available for purchase. The ship shall not be required to deviate from its intended voyage or to delay unduly the voyage in order to achieve compliance. If a ship provides the information set out in paragraph 1, Member States shall take into account all relevant circumstances and the evidence presented to determine the appropriate action to take, including not taking control measures. A ship shall notify its administration and the competent authority of the relevant port of destination when it cannot purchase compliant fuel oil. Member States shall notify the Commission when a ship has presented evidence of the non-availability of compliant fuel oil.”
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 9 – point a Directive 1999/32/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall take all necessary measures to check by sampling that the sulphur content of fuels used complies with Articles 3, 3a, 4, 4a and 4b. The sampling shall commence on the date on which the relevant limit for maximum sulphur content in the fuel comes into force. It shall be carried out
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 9 – point a Directive 1999/32/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall take all necessary measures to check by sampling that the sulphur content of fuels used complies with Articles 3, 3a, 4, 4a and 4b. The sampling shall commence on the date on which the relevant limit for maximum sulphur content in the fuel comes into force. It shall be carried out with sufficient frequency, in sufficient quantities and in such a way that the samples are representative of the fuel examined, and in the case of marine fuel, of the fuel being used by vessels while in relevant sea areas and ports.
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 9 – point a Directive 1999/32/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall take all necessary measures to check by sampling that the sulphur content of fuels used complies with
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 9 – point a Directive 1999/32/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b (b)
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 9 – point a Directive 1999/32/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b (b) sampling and analysis of the sulphur content of marine fuel for onboard combustion contained in
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 9 – point a Directive 1999/32/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) sampling and analysis for verification that the use of marine fuel for onboard combustion is in accordance with guidelines to be developed by the IMO;
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 9 – point a Directive 1999/32/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 9 – point a Directive 1999/32/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 9 – point a Directive 1999/32/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 a (new) Such delegated acts shall be adopted in the form of binding implementing legislation for the monitoring and reporting of data pursuant to this Directive. The Commission shall adopt such implementing legislation by 31 December 2013.
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 9 – point b Directive 1999/32/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (b) paragraph 1a is
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 10 – point a Directive 1999/32/EC Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. Each year, by 30 June, the Member States shall
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 10 – point b Directive 1999/32/EC Article 7 – paragraph 1 a 1a. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 9a concerning the information to be included in the report and the format of the report. This information to be included in the report and the format of the report shall be specified in the form of binding implementing legislation for the monitoring and reporting of data pursuant to this Directive. The Commission shall adopt such implementing legislation by 31 December 2013.
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 10 – point b a (new) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 7– paragraph 1 a a (new) (ba) the following paragraph 1aa shall be inserted: „(1aa) The Member States concerned shall by 1 January of each year supply the Commission with a report on the impacts of the implementation of Article (4a)(1)(b) of this Directive. The report shall contain inter alia the following matters : a) economic impacts on the industries concerned, including impacts on labour markets; b) an evaluation of modal back shift and its environmental impacts, c) the development and utilisation rate of abatement methods, and d) the availability and effects of Union financial tools and state aids. On the basis of Member State reports, and taking into account in addition the work within the IMO, the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and Council by the end of 2013. The Commission shall submit with its report proposals aimed at amending this Directive and in particular the limit values and the postponement of the effective dates laid down for SOx Emission Control Areas.”
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 10 – point c Directive 1999/32/EC Article 7 – paragraphs 2 and 3 (c) paragraph
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 10 – point c Directive 1999/32/EC Article 7 – paragraphs 2 and 3 (c) paragraph
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 10 – point b a (new) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 7– paragraph 3 a (new) (ba) the following paragraph 3a shall be inserted: (3a) The Commission shall carry out an impact assessment of the Directive and by the end of 2012 propose a set of compensatory measures to diminish the negative impacts on shipping industries throughout the Union.
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 10 – point d Directive 1999/32/EC Article 7 – paragraph 4 Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 10 – point d a (new) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 7 – paragraph 4 a (new) (da) the following paragraph 4a shall be inserted: „4a. By 31 December 2015, the Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the observed trends in air quality (including concentrations, exposure, and deposition of air pollutants) and in particular on shipping emissions of SO2, NOx and PM (including black carbon). The Commission may consider submitting proposals to revise the sulphur limit values laid down for each fuel category, as well as proposals aimed at reducing other air pollutants by sea-going ships or at introducing emission charges for air pollution in Europe, provided that environmental and health benefits can be clearly demonstrated.”
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 10 – point d a (new) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 7 – paragraph 4 b (new) (da) the following paragraph 4b shall be inserted: „(4b) By 31 December 2015 at the latest, the Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the possible adoption of comprehensive quality standards for marine fuel oil, including full specifications for marine fuel oils such as, inter alia, ash content, aluminium and silicon, other metals (iron, nickel and other metals), acidic and corrosive substances and chemicals. In the context of the review of the EU air quality legislation planned for 2013, the Commission shall consider submitting a proposal for a comprehensive fuel quality standard for marine fuel oil as a complementary measure to this Directive, provided that safety, environmental and health benefits can be clearly demonstrated.”
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 13 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 9 a – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The delegation of powers referred to in Article 4a(1a) and (2) shall be restricted to the incorporation into this Directive of decisions taken by the IMO.
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 13 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 9 a – paragraph 3 3. The delegation of power referred to in Articles 4a(1a) and (2), 4
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 13 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 9a – paragraph 5 5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Articles 4a(1a) and (2), 4c(4), 6(1), 7(1a) and 7(4) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – point 1 – point 1 Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by [1
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – point 1 – point 1 Member States shall be allowed a transitional period of at least ten years for the implementation of this Directive. Thereafter they shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a directive Annex Directive 1999/32/EC Annex 2 – paragraph 2 – indent 2 Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a directive Annex Directive 1999/32/EC Annex 2 – paragraph 2 – indent 2 Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a directive Annex Directive 1999/32/EC Annex 2 – paragraph 2 – indent 2 – document thoroughly
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) (1a) Article 191 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union lays down that Union policy on the environment shall aim at a high level of protection taking into account the diversity of situations in the various regions of the Union.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) (1a) Acidification still remains a widespread problem in Europe. Significant European regions still remain particularly sensitive to acidification issues and the Union has not yet achieved its objectives regarding critical loads and levels.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Emissions from shipping due to the combustion of marine fuels with a high sulphur content contribute to air pollution in the form of sulphur dioxide and particulate matter, which harm human health and
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) Acidification occurs in SECAs designated by the IMO, where ecosystems are damaged if critical loads are exceeded and which must be protected owing to their particular vulnerability. European Union legislation therefore needs to be aligned with IMO decisions, and limit values for sulphur content should be more stringent in SECAs.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) Air pollution caused by ships at berth, in particular by cruise ships, is a major concern for harbour cities when it comes to their efforts to meet the Union’s air quality limit values for particulate matter and NO2.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) Member States should support the development of infrastructure needed for shore-side electricity as the electricity for present day ships is usually provided by auxiliary engines.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 b (new) (3b) Unilaterally extending SECA requirements to other sea areas in the European Union (Atlantic, Mediterranean and Black Sea), in which a significant proportion of maritime traffic is international, would have major economic repercussions and lead to 'sulphur leakage' without achieving any substantial environmental improvements. Involving third countries bordering on these sea areas in order to reduce the sulphur content of marine fuels can be achieved only through the IMO.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 b (new) (3b) Emissions from land-based sources have been reduced, while air pollution from shipping is projected to increase dramatically. By approximately 2020, SOx and NOx emissions from shipping would, without further action, therefore be higher than emissions from all land-based sources.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 c (new) (3c) Damage to human health as a consequence of air pollution in ports and nearby towns and cities should be remedied by using fuel with a maximum sulphur content of 0.10% by mass for docking and departure manoeuvres.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) According to Directive 1999/32/EC the Commission is to report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of the Directive and to table any proposals for amendments, in particular as regards the reduction of sulphur limits for marine fuel in SOx Emission Control Areas (SECAs),
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Whilst this Directive aims at reducing emissions from secondary particulate matter, the Commission should complement its effort to address air pollution from shipping by investigating measures to reduce emissions of primary particulate matter from ships, including abatement efficiencies, costs, benefits, and also the potential to reduce black carbon. After a review of available emission control measures for primary particulate matter and black carbon, the Commission shall, if appropriate, come forward with proposals for particulate matter and black carbon emission standards for ships.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) It is also important that the Commission assess the consequences of ensuring compliance by the sector on the basis of reports drawn up by the Member States, in order to permit the upstream planning of appropriate accompanying measures, particularly by carrying out studies on the availability of fuels, their prices, the risks of a retrograde modal switch and the impact of the measures of this directive on all economic operators in the maritime transport sector. The results of this study would make it possible to clarify the Commission’s proposals on the deployment of its toolbox in practice and the implementation of the arrangements for sustainable water transport.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 b (new) Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 c (new) (4c) Some types of SOx abatement methods can generate waste, in particular wastewater containing mercury, selenium, and other trace elements that may necessitate treatment of the wastewater before discharge. The Commission should adopt guidelines for the harmonised development of reception facilities in Union ports.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) The revised Annex VI to MARPOL introduces, inter alia, stricter sulphur limits for marine fuel in SECAs (1.00% as of 1 July 2010 and 0.10% as of 1 January 2015)
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) The revised Annex VI to MARPOL introduces, inter alia, stricter sulphur limits for marine fuel in SECAs (1.00% as of 1 July 2010 and 0.10% as of 1 January 2015) as well as in sea areas outside SECAs (3.5% as of 1 January 2012 and, in principle, 0.50% as of 1 January 2020). Most Member States are obliged to require ships to use fuel with maximum 1.00% sulphur content in SECAs as of 1 July
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) The revised Annex VI to MARPOL introduces, inter alia, stricter sulphur limits for marine fuel in SECAs (1.00% as of 1 July 2010 and 0.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) The revised Annex VI to MARPOL introduces, inter alia, stricter sulphur limits for marine fuel in SECAs (1.00% as of 1 July 2010 and 0.10% as of 1 January 2015) as well as in sea areas outside SECAs (3.5% as of 1 January 2012 and, in principle, 0.50% as of 1 January 2020). Most Member States are obliged to require ships to use fuel with maximum 1.00% sulphur content in SECAs as of 1 July 2010 based on their international commitments. In order to ensure coherence with international law as well as to secure
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) The revised Annex VI to MARPOL introduces, inter alia, stricter sulphur limits for marine fuel in SECAs (1.00% as of 1 July 2010 and 0.10% as of 1 January 2015) as well as in sea areas outside SECAs (3.5% as of 1 January 2012 and, in principle, 0.50% as of 1 January 2020). Most Member States are obliged to require ships to use fuel with maximum 1.00% sulphur content in SECAs as of 1 July 2010 based on their international commitments. In order to ensure coherence with international law as well as to secure proper enforcement of new globally
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) The revised Annex VI to MARPOL introduces, inter alia, stricter sulphur limits for marine fuel in SECAs (1.00 % as of 1 July 2010 and 0.10 % as of 1 January 2015) as well as in sea areas outside SECAs (3.5 % as of 1 January 2012 and, in principle, 0.50 % as of 1 January 2020). Most Member States are obliged to require ships to use fuel with maximum 1.00 % sulphur content in SECAs as of 1 July 2010 based on their international commitments. In order to ensure coherence with international law and a global level playing field, as well as to secure proper enforcement of new globally established sulphur standards in the Union, the provisions of Directive 1999/32/EC should be aligned with the revised Annex VI to MARPOL. Because of the need to ensure that all Member States have effective and equal access to the internal and international market it is vital to respect the challenges some industries will be confronted with when different sulphur emission levels are introduced in the Union. Also, it is important to monitor the situation closely and to create solutions which would achieve a minimum level playing field. In order to ensure a minimum quality of fuel used by ships either for fuel or technology based compliance, marine fuel the sulphur content of which exceeds the general standard of 3.5 % by mass should not be allowed for use or placing on the market in
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) (6a) In view of the health benefits of lower sulphur emissions, and to ensure that the sector is treated in the same way throughout the EU, the 0.10% limit should apply to the territorial waters of all Member States.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) (6a) The sulphur content of fuel is only one of the indicators used to determine the quality of fuel. The Union should adopt a more comprehensive and detailed set of specifications so as to identify fully the quality of fuel in the maritime sector.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) (6a) However, given the risk that the reduction to 0.1% in 2015 might lead to a modal switch for some intra-EU traffic, Member States should be allowed the option of requesting, in the context of the IMO, exemptions for a limited area and time, with a view to facilitating the use of alternative methods of emissions reduction.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) (6a) In view of the health benefits of lower sulphur emissions, the Commission should consider extending the 0.10% limit to other seas bordering on Member States’ land mass or extending that limit so as to cover a fixed distance from the EU coastline, and should draw up a firm timetable for its enforcement.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 b (new) (6b) In order to ensure a minimum quality of fuel used by ships for either fuel- or technology-based compliance, marine fuel the sulphur content of which exceeds the general standard of 3.5% by mass should not be allowed for use or placing on the market in the Union. That limit should apply only to fuel to be used to power ships and not to fuel being transported by ship.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Passenger ships operate mostly in ports or close to coastal areas and their impacts on human health and the environment are significant. Those ships are currently required to use marine fuel with the same maximum sulphur content as is applicable in SECAs (1.5%). Given that the MARPOL Convention establishes less strict
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Passenger ships operate mostly in ports or close to coastal areas and their impacts on human health and the environment are significant. Those ships are required to use marine fuel with the same maximum sulphur content as is applicable in SECAs (1.5%). Given that stricter sulphur standards will apply in SECAs, it is justified by the need to improve air quality around ports and coasts in the non-SECA territories that the same standards apply to passenger ships. However, the introduction of a new SECA standard for passenger ships would be delayed by 5 years in order to avoid potential problems with fuel availability
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Passenger ships on regular services operate mostly in ports or close to coastal areas and their impacts on human health and the environment are significant. Those ships are required to use marine fuel with the same maximum sulphur content as is applicable in SECAs (1.5%). Given that stricter sulphur standards will apply in SECAs, it is justified by the need to improve air quality around ports and coasts in the non-SECA territories that the same standards apply to passenger ships. However, the introduction of a new SECA standard for passenger ships would be delayed by 5 years in order to avoid potential problems with fuel availability.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Passenger ships operate mostly in ports or close to coastal areas and their impacts on human health and the environment are significant. Those ships are required to use marine fuel with the same maximum sulphur content as is applicable in SECAs (1.5%). Given that stricter sulphur standards will apply in SECAs, it is justified by the need to improve air quality around ports and coasts in the non-SECA territories that the same standards apply to passenger ships. However, the introduction of a new SECA standard for passenger ships would be delayed by
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Passenger ships operate mostly in ports or close to coastal areas and their impacts on human health and the environment are significant. Those ships are required to use marine fuel with the same maximum sulphur content as is applicable in SECAs (1.5%). Given that stricter sulphur standards will apply in SECAs, it is justified by the need to improve air quality around ports and coasts in the non-SECA territories that the same standards apply to passenger ships. However, the introduction of a new SECA standard for passenger ships would be delayed by 5 years in order to avoid potential problems with fuel availability. A further five-year exemption will apply in respect of transport services to and from island areas for which the resulting additional costs would have a devastating impact on local communities.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Passenger ships operate mostly in ports or close to coastal areas and their impacts on human health and the environment are significant.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Passenger ships operate mostly in ports or close to coastal areas and their impacts on human health and the environment are significant. Those ships are required to use marine fuel with the same maximum sulphur content as is applicable in SECAs (1.5%). Given that stricter sulphur standards will apply in SECAs, it is justified by the need to improve air quality around ports and coasts in the non-SECA territories that the same standards apply to passenger ships. However, the introduction of a new SECA standard for passenger ships
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Passenger ships operate mostly in ports or close to coastal areas and their impacts on human health and the environment are significant. Those ships are required to use marine fuel with the same maximum sulphur content as is applicable in SECAs (1.5%). Given that stricter sulphur standards will apply in SECAs, it is justified by the need to improve air quality around ports and coasts in the non-SECA territories that the same standards apply to passenger ships. However, the introduction of a new SECA standard for passenger ships would be delayed by
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) Having regard to the principle of equal treatment, EU health and environment policy proposals should treat EU citizens equally. Legislation regarding the internal market should be based on the principle of legal certainty. Member States with territorial seas must be bound by equal fuel quality requirements in order to ensure air quality benefits to the Member States whose coasts are not part of SECAs and to establish a minimum level playing field for the sector across the Union.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) In order to facilitate the transition to new engine technologies with the potential for significant further emission reductions in the maritime sector, the Commission should prepare without delay a comprehensive liquefied natural gas deployment strategy to enable and encourage the uptake of gas powered engines in ships.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) In order to ensure air quality benefits to the Member States whose coasts are not part of SECAs, the introduction of any new SECA should be debated on the basis of scientific data regarding its environmental and economic impact and only after its introduction has been examined and approved through the relevant IMO process.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) In order to ensure air quality benefits to the Member States whose coasts are not part of SECAs, the introduction of any new emission control areas should be subject to the IMO process under Annex VI to MARPOL and be underpinned by a well-founded case based on environmental and economic grounds and supported by scientific data.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) Islands and sparsely populated areas are exposed to particular challenges such as poor accessibility. Taking into account that territorial cohesion is an objective of the Union, a special derogation with regard to passenger ships is needed for Spain, for the Canary Islands, France, for the French Overseas Departments, Greece, for the whole or part of its territory, and Portugal, for the archipelagos of Madeira and Azores.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Proper enforcement of the obligations with regard to the sulphur content of marine fuels is necessary to achieve the aims of Directive 1999/32/EC. The experience from the implementation of that Directive has shown that there is a need for stronger monitoring and enforcement regime to ensure a proper implementation of the Directive. To that end, it is necessary that Member States ensure sufficiently frequent and accurate sampling of marine fuel placed on the market or used on board ship as well as regular verification of ships' log books and bunker delivery notes. It is also necessary that they establish a system of effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties for non-compliance with the provisions of Directive 1999/32/EC. In
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 a (new) (8a) Implementation and enforcement of this Directive has been highlighted as a concern. In order to ease monitoring of compliance, all ships should be required to install tamper-proof equipment for the continuous monitoring of funnel gas emissions of SO2, NOx (and PM) and use it throughout their stay in EU waters, including the territorial seas of Member States . The data collected by this equipment should be kept on board and be provided to the relevant authorities on request.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 a (new) (8a) Enforcement of the 0.10% limit in the years immediately following 2015 should take account of uncertainty about the availability of low-sulphur fuel and differing views on the effectiveness and reliability of emission abatement methods. In particular the Commission and Member States should refrain from acting against firms which are making genuine efforts to comply with the rules. Member States should ensure, in accordance with Regulation 18 of MARPOL Annex VI, that the availability of fuel with a sulphur content conforming to the standards is guaranteed equally in terms of regions and to any persons wishing to use it.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) Reporting by Member States under Directive 1999/32/EC has proved insufficient for the purpose of verification of compliance with the provisions of the Directive due to the lack of harmonized and sufficiently precise provisions on the content and the format of the Member States' reports. Therefore, the Commission shall adopt binding implementing legislation pursuant to this Directive establishing more detailed indications as regards the content and the format of the report
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Complying with the low fuel sulphur limits, particularly in SECAs, can result in a significant increase in the price of marine fuels, at least in the short term, and can have a negative effect for the competitiveness of short sea shipping in comparison with other transport modes as well as for the competitiveness of the industries in the countries bordering SECAs. Suitable solutions are necessary in order to reduce compliance costs for the affected industries,
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Complying with the low fuel sulphur limits, particularly in SECAs, can result in a significant increase in the price of marine fuels, at least in the short term, and can have a negative effect for the competitiveness of short sea shipping in comparison with other transport modes as well as for the competitiveness of the industries in the countries bordering SECAs. Suitable solutions are necessary in order to reduce compliance costs for the affected industries, such as allowing for alternative, more cost-effective methods of compliance than fuel-based compliance and providing support, where necessary. The Commission will, on the bas
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Complying with the low fuel sulphur limits, particularly in SECAs,
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Complying with the low fuel sulphur limits, particularly in SECAs, can result in a significant increase in the price of marine fuels, at least in the short term, and can have a negative effect for the competitiveness of
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Complying with the low fuel sulphur limits, particularly in SECAs,
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Complying with the low fuel sulphur limits, particularly in SECAs, can result in a significant increase in the price of marine fuels, at least in the short term, and can have a negative effect for the competitiveness of short sea shipping in comparison with other transport modes as well as for the competitiveness of the industries in the countries bordering SECAs. Suitable solutions are necessary in order to reduce compliance costs for the affected industries, such as allowing for alternative, more cost-effective methods of compliance than fuel-based compliance and providing support, where necessary. The Commission will, based inter alia on reports from Member States, closely monitor the impacts of the shipping sector's compliance with the new fuel quality standards, particularly with respect to possible modal backshift from sea to land based transport
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 a (new) (11a) In view of the economic situation and possible adverse effects of this Directive, the Commission should propose specific support measures for the sectors concerned before the Directive enters into force.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 a (new) (11a) In order to maintain the competitiveness of maritime transport while improving its environmental performance, the Commission should impose economic and financial measures to support environmental maritime technologies (scrubbers, substitute fuels etc.) and an environmental infrastructure. In SECAs (particularly in the Baltic and North Seas) special measures should be applied and additional funds should be granted to guarantee compliance with fuel standards.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 b (new) (11b) The Commission should allow the possibility of vessel-related deferral if the continued operation of a given older seagoing ship under the new standards is manifestly and with good reason not economically viable.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Access to emission abatement methods should be facilitated. Those methods can provide emission reductions at least equivalent to, or even greater than, those achievable using low sulphur fuel, provided that they have no significant negative impacts on the environment, such as marine ecosystems, and that they are developed subject to appropriate approval and control mechanisms. The criteria for use of emission abatement methods should be established either by the IMO, subject to supplementation or amendment by the Commission Decision or, in the absence of the IMO instruments, by the European Commission. The already known alternative methods, such as the use of on- board exhaust gas cleaning systems or the mixture of fuel and liquefied natural gas
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Access to emission abatement methods should be facilitated. Those methods can provide emission reductions at least equivalent to, or even greater than, those achievable using low sulphur fuel, provided that they have no significant negative impacts on the environment, such as marine ecosystems, or on human health, and that they are developed subject to appropriate approval and control mechanisms. The criteria for use of emission abatement methods should be established either by the IMO, subject to supplementation or amendment by the Commission Decision or, in the absence of the IMO instruments, by the European Commission. The already known alternative methods, such as the use of on- board exhaust gas cleaning systems or the mixture of fuel and liquefied natural gas (LNG) should be recognised in the Union. It is important to promote and financially assist the testing and development of new emission abatement methods.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Access to emission abatement methods should be facilitated. Those methods can provide emission reductions at least equivalent to, or even greater than, those achievable using low sulphur fuel, provided that they have no significant negative impacts on the environment, such as marine ecosystems or CO2 emissions, and that they are developed subject to appropriate approval and control mechanisms. The criteria for use of emission abatement methods should be established either by the IMO, subject to supplementation or amendment by the Commission Decision or, in the absence of the IMO instruments, by the European Commission. The already known alternative methods, such as the use of on- board exhaust gas cleaning systems or the mixture of fuel and liquefied natural gas (LNG) should be recognised in the Union. It is important to promote testing and development of new emission abatement methods.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Access to emission abatement methods should be facilitated and supported through incentives. Those methods can provide emission reductions
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 a (new) (12a) Any financial incentives by Member States for emission abatement methods that achieve emissions reductions which are at least equivalent to those achieved through the use of low sulphur fuels, should take account of the investments made prior to the adoption of this Directive, provided that the equipment complies with the IMO criteria.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 a (new) (12a) Member States should ensure the availability and balanced distribution of compliant fuel in accordance with Regulation 18 of the revised Annex VI to MARPOL. In the event that compliant fuel might not be available in some ports (for example, those lacking in the physical distribution of compliant fuel), the ship should be permitted to invoke the exemption as provided for under Regulation 18 of the revised Annex VI to MARPOL. The ship should not be required to deviate from its intended voyage or to delay unduly the voyage in order to achieve compliance.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 a (new) (12a) To encourage the use of alternative fuels such as liquefied natural gas, ports must be able to distribute it in a satisfactory and safe manner. Increased investments in new facilities and infrastructure to meet these demands should be promoted. Union transport funding instruments like TEN-T and Marco Polo should be reviewed, to help develop and build the necessary infrastructure.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 a (new) Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 a (new) (12a) It is advisable to require Member States to apply "no special fee" policies to effluents from exhaust gas cleaning systems in ports to ensure proper care of any wastes from the use of alternative abatement methods.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 a (new) (12a) In order to encourage early adoption of emission abatement methods achieving at least the same reductions in sulphur emissions as laid down in this Directive, alternatives, such as the use of on-board exhaust gas cleaning systems and LNG technologies, should be promoted by the Union and Member States through appropriate financial incentives.
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 a (new) (12a) The use of liquefied natural gas (LNG) virtually eliminates sulphur emissions. New rules for ships powered by liquefied natural gas are expected to enter into force in 2014 along with the revised International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS). Member States should pay particular attention to the need to ensure the safety and availability of LNG-powered ships while preventing the revised SOLAS Convention from creating needless obstacles to the use of that fuel.
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 b (new) (12b) Member States should ensure the availability and balanced distribution of compliant fuel in accordance with Regulation 18 of the revised Annex VI to MARPOL, taking into consideration the economic and environmental cost of deviation from the ship's intended voyage.
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 b (new) (12b) In order to facilitate investment decisions being made in a timely manner, incentives should support early adaptation. To avoid the potential risk of modal backshift and to limit competitive disadvantages it is necessary to introduce Member State funding programmes for the implementation of new requirements regarding the use of low-sulphur fuel.
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 c (new) (12c) Alternative abatement methods such as scrubbers could generate waste that should not be discharged in the sea. The Commission should therefore adopt common guidelines to ensure proper care of any such waste.
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) In order to determine the date of the application of 0.50% sulphur limit in conformity with the IMO decision, to designate new SECAs, to approve new alternative abatement methods and to establish the appropriate conditions for their use, to ensure appropriate monitoring of sulphur content of fuels and the harmonized content and the format of Member States' reports and to adapt the provisions of the Directive to scientific and technical progress, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of specification of the date from which the maximum sulphur content of fuel of 0.50% by mass should apply in the Union, designation of new SECAs on the basis of the decision of the IMO, approval of new emission abatement methods not covered by Council Directive 96/98/EC1
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) In order to determine the date of the application of 0.50% sulphur limit, to designate new SECAs, to approve new alternative abatement methods and to establish the appropriate conditions for their use, to ensure appropriate monitoring of sulphur content of fuels and the harmonized content and the format of Member States' reports and to adapt the provisions of the Directive to scientific and technical progress, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of specification of the date from which the maximum sulphur content of fuel of 0.50% by mass should apply in the Union, designation of new SECAs
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) In order to determine the date of the application of 0.50% sulphur limit, to designate new SECAs, to approve new alternative abatement methods and to establish the appropriate conditions for their use, to ensure appropriate monitoring of sulphur content of fuels and the harmonized content and the format of Member States' reports and to adapt the provisions of the Directive to scientific and technical progress, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of specification of
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) In order to determine the date of the application of 0.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 a (new) (14a) Considering the global dimension of environmental politics and shipping emissions, this Directive encourages the Union and its Member States to actively advance, in the IMO, the objective of achieving uniform emission standards for all maritime areas of the world.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 a (new) (14a) The Commission and the Member States should work by common accord to achieve common and fully harmonised emissions standards and rules on sulphur emissions from maritime transport throughout the EU. Since this may require further decisions in the IMO, the Commission should give the Member States support and encouragement in their contacts with the IMO.
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 a (new) Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 2 – point -a (new) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 2 – point 3 -a. point 3 is replaced by the following: 3. marine fuel means any petroleum- derived liquid fuel, as well as bio-fuels, intended for use or in use on board a vessel, including those fuels defined in ISO 8217. It includes any petroleum- derived liquid fuel in use on board inland waterway vessels or recreational craft, as defined in Directive 97/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1997 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to measures against the emission of gaseous and particulate pollutants from internal combustion engines to be installed in non-road mobile machinery and Directive 94/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 June 1994 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to recreational craft, when such vessels are at sea;
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 1999/32/EC Article 2 – point 3 m 3m. emission abatement method means any fitting, material, appliance or apparatus to be fitted in a ship or other procedure,
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 1999/32/EC Article 2 – point 3 m 3m. emission abatement method means any fitting, material, appliance or apparatus to be fitted in a ship or other procedure, alternative fuel, or compliance method, used as an alternative to low sulphur marine fuel meeting the requirements set out in this Directive
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 1999/32/EC Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) in combustion plants which fall within the scope of Chapter III of Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, and which comply with the emission limits for sulphur dioxide for such plants as set out in Annex V of that Directive or, where those emission limit values are not applicable according to that Directive, for which the monthly average sulphur dioxide emissions do not exceed
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 3 – point a Directive 1999/32/EC Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) in combustion plants which do not fall under point (a), and the monthly average sulphur dioxide emissions of which do not exceed
source: PE-478.489
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/11 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/10 |
|
events/11 |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2011&number=0190&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2011&number=0190&appLng=EN |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/instrument |
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/subject/2.50.03 |
Securities and financial markets, stock exchange, CIUTS, investments
|
procedure/subject/2.50.08 |
Financial services, financial reporting and auditing
|
procedure/subject/2.50.10 |
Financial supervision
|
procedure/subject/3.20.03 |
Maritime transport: passengers and freight
|
procedure/subject/3.60.02 |
Oil industry, motor fuels
|
procedure/subject/3.70.02 |
Atmospheric pollution, motor vehicle pollution
|
procedure/subject/3.70.05 |
Marine and coastal pollution, pollution from ships, oil pollution
|
procedure/subtype |
Old
Examination of delegated actNew
Legislation |
procedure/title |
Old
Regulatory technical standards for the key investment information sheetNew
Prevention of pollution from ships: sulphur content of marine fuels |
procedure/type |
Old
DEA - Delegated acts procedureNew
COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure) |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed - delegated act enters into forceNew
Preparatory phase in Parliament |
procedure/subject/2.10.01 |
Customs union, tax and duty-free, Community transit
|
procedure/subject/2.50.03 |
Securities and financial markets, stock exchange, CIUTS, investments
|
procedure/subject/2.50.08 |
Financial services, financial reporting and auditing
|
procedure/subject/2.50.10 |
Financial supervision
|
procedure/subject/6.20.02 |
Export/import control, trade defence, trade barriers
|
procedure/subject/7.30.02 |
Customs cooperation
|
procedure/title |
Old
Integrated Border Management Fund: instrument for financial support for customs control equipment - establishment of a monitoring and evaluation frameworkNew
Regulatory technical standards for the key investment information sheet |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3/date |
Old
2022-06-22T00:00:00New
2022-07-06T00:00:00 |
events/4 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
IMCO/9/09520
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ECON/9/09340
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Procedure completed - delegated act enters into force |
procedure/subject/2.10.01 |
Customs union, tax and duty-free, Community transit
|
procedure/subject/2.50.03 |
Securities and financial markets, stock exchange, CIUTS, investments
|
procedure/subject/2.50.04 |
Banks and credit
|
procedure/subject/2.50.05 |
Insurance, pension funds
|
procedure/subject/2.50.08 |
Financial services, financial reporting and auditing
|
procedure/subject/2.50.10 |
Financial supervision
|
procedure/subject/6.20.02 |
Export/import control, trade defence, trade barriers
|
procedure/subject/7.30.02 |
Customs cooperation
|
procedure/title |
Old
Technical details of back-testing and profit and loss attribution requirements under Articles 325bf and 325bg of the Capital Requirements RegulationNew
Integrated Border Management Fund: instrument for financial support for customs control equipment - establishment of a monitoring and evaluation framework |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/4 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ECON/9/09340
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
AGRI/9/09355
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed - delegated act enters into forceNew
Awaiting committee decision |
procedure/subject/2.50.03 |
Securities and financial markets, stock exchange, CIUTS, investments
|
procedure/subject/2.50.04 |
Banks and credit
|
procedure/subject/2.50.05 |
Insurance, pension funds
|
procedure/subject/2.50.08 |
Financial services, financial reporting and auditing
|
procedure/subject/2.50.10 |
Financial supervision
|
procedure/subject/3.10 |
Agricultural policy and economies
|
procedure/subject/3.10.12 |
Agrimonetary policy, compensatory amounts
|
procedure/title |
Old
Payment of advances for certain interventions and support measuresNew
Technical details of back-testing and profit and loss attribution requirements under Articles 325bf and 325bg of the Capital Requirements Regulation |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/11 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/10 |
|
events/11 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
AGRI/9/09355
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ENVI/7/06591
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/instrument |
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completedNew
Procedure completed - delegated act enters into force |
procedure/subject/3.10 |
Agricultural policy and economies
|
procedure/subject/3.10.12 |
Agrimonetary policy, compensatory amounts
|
procedure/subject/3.20.03 |
Maritime transport: passengers and freight
|
procedure/subject/3.60.02 |
Oil industry, motor fuels
|
procedure/subject/3.70.02 |
Atmospheric pollution, motor vehicle pollution
|
procedure/subject/3.70.05 |
Marine and coastal pollution, pollution from ships, oil pollution
|
procedure/subtype |
Old
LegislationNew
Examination of delegated act |
procedure/title |
Old
Prevention of pollution from ships: sulphur content of marine fuelsNew
Payment of advances for certain interventions and support measures |
procedure/type |
Old
COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure)New
DEA - Delegated acts procedure |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0919/COM_SEC(2011)0919_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0919/COM_SEC(2011)0919_EN.pdf |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE478.489New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AM-478489_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE475.799New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-PR-475799_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE474.004&secondRef=04New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AD-474004_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0151)(documentyear:2012)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0151)(documentyear:2012)(documentlanguage:EN) |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/6/docs |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0918/COM_SEC(2011)0918_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0918/COM_SEC(2011)0918_EN.pdf |
docs/7/body |
EC
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0475/COM_COM(2013)0475_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0475/COM_COM(2013)0475_EN.pdf |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-38&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0038_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-315New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0315_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
Economic and Social Committee Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ENVI/7/06591New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32012L0033New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32012L0033 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
DirectiveNew
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0439:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0439:EN
|
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
procedure/subject/0 |
Old
3.20.03 Sea transport: passengers and freightNew
3.20.03 Maritime transport: passengers and freight |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|