12 Amendments of Herbert DORFMANN related to 2010/0279(COD)
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital -1 b (new)
Recital -1 b (new)
(-1b) The Stability and Growth Pact and the complete economic governance framework should complement and be compatible with a Union strategy for growth and jobs which aims at boosting the Union's competitiveness and social stability, without prejudice to achieving sound public finances.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) A graduation of sanctions should be introduced by which the Commission should already impose an interest-bearing deposit following non compliance with the relevant deadline, with a view to impose a fine after non compliance with two relevant deadlines.
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) A graduation of sanctions should be introduced by which the Council should already impose an interest-bearing deposit following non compliance with the relevant deadline imposed by the Council, with a view to impose a fine after non compliance with two relevant deadlines.
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) The collected fines should be distributed between Member States whose currency is the euro which are neither the subject of an excessive imbalance procedure nor have an excessive deficitallocated to a permanent crisis mechanism (European Stability Mechanism). Until the establishment of such a fund, the fines should be credited to the European Financial Stability Facility.
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation sets out a system of finesanctions for effective correction of macroeconomic imbalances in the euro area.
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
A yearly fine shall be imposed by the Council, acting on a proposal byn interest-bearing deposit shall be imposed the Commission, if:
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 1
(1) two successivea deadlines haves been set in accordance with Articles 7(21) and 10(4) of Regulation (EU) No […/…], and the Councilmmission thereafter concludes in accordance with Article 10(4) of that Regulation that the Member State concerned has still not taken the recommended corrective action, or if
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 2
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 2
(2) two successivea deadlines haves been set in accordance with Articles 8(1) and 8(2) of Regulation (EU) No […/…], and the Councilmmission thereafter concludes in accordance with Article 8(2) of that Regulation that the Member State concerned has again submitted an insufficient corrective action plan.
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4
Article 3 – paragraph 4
4. If a Member State has paid a yearly fineconstituted the interest-bearing deposit for a given calendar year and the Councilmmission thereafter concludes, in accordance with Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) No […/…] that the Member State has taken the recommended corrective action in the course of the given year, the finedeposit paid for the given year together with the accrued interest shall be returned to the Member State pro rata temporis.
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. A yearly fine shall be imposed by the Commission, if: (1) two successive deadlines have been set in accordance with Articles 7(1) and 10(4) of Regulation (EU) No […/…], and the Commission thereafter concludes in accordance with Article 10(1) of that Regulation that the Member State concerned has still not taken the recommended corrective action, or if (2) two successive deadlines have been set in accordance with Articles 8(1) and 8(2) of Regulation (EU) No […/…], and the Commission thereafter concludes in accordance with Article 8(2) of that Regulation that the Member State concerned has again submitted an insufficient corrective action plan.
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4 b (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. If a Member State has paid a yearly fine for a given calendar year and the Commission thereafter concludes, in accordance with Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) No […/…] that the Member State has taken the recommended corrective action in the course of the given year, the fine paid for the given year shall be returned to the Member State pro rata temporis.
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4
Article 4
Fines collected in accordance with Article 3 of this Regulation shall constitute other revenue, as referred to in Article 311 of the TreatyTFEU, and shall be distributed, in proportion to their share in the total gross national income (GNI) of the eligible Member States, between Member States whose currency isallocated to the permanent crisis mechanism (European Stability Mechanism). Until the establishment of the eEuro and which are not the subject of an excessive imbalance procedure within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No […/…] and do not have an excessive deficit as determined in accordance with Article 126(6) of the Treapean Stability Mechanism, those fines shall be credited to the European Financial Stability Facility.