7 Amendments of Herbert DORFMANN related to 2020/2036(INI)
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Commission to follow the European Banking Authority (EBA)'s report presenting the outcome of the assessment on the European Secured Notes (ESNs) in order to design a legislative proposal on the ESNs. This new instrument should be structured as a new dual recourse-funding instrument for banks and should be used by the banks only subject to a real improvement of the conditions of access to financing for families and SMEs (excluding those working in the financial industry) across the EU;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Recalls that, through the current treatment of minority interest of subsidiaries, the CRR tend to discourage listing on the stock markets, reduces investment held by parent companies in their subsidiaries, thus generating a reduction of banks' ability to finance the real economy; calls on the Commission to amend the CRR in order to increase the amount of minority interests included in consolidated CET1;
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Recalls that the Solvency 2 Directive requires a review by the end of 2020 and that the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) will provide technical advice to the Commission after consultations with different stakeholders; requests the Commission and EIOPA to consider adjusting the capital requirements for investments in equity and private debt, in particular of SMEs, also through the internal model approach;
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. In implementing the "finalization of Basel III" Standards, calls on the Commission to pay due attention to risk weights applicable to banks' investments in equity, especially of long-term SMEs equity;
Amendment 244 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Recalls the existence of different shortcomings in the legislation on packaged retail investment and insurance products (PRIIPs) that should be addressed in the next review; expects that Level 2 PRIIPs legislation on the Key Investor Document to respect level 1, in particular in order to improve the methodologies relationed to the performance scenarios; and to ensure comparability among different investment products, regrets the delays in the adoption of Level 2 PRIIPs legislation that will overlap with the first review of PRIIPs, and which increases legal uncertainty and costs for stakeholders;
Amendment 256 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Urges the Commission to make clear the differentiation between professional and retail investors on all levels of MIFID, making it possible to tailor the treatment of clients according to their knowledge and experience on the markets; requests that the Commission consider the introduction of a category of semi-professional investors to better respond to the reality of participation on the financial markets; however, the application of this new "category" of clients should be left to the discretion of the investment firms that should be free to include (or not) semi-professional clients in their own service model;
Amendment 264 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19