Activities of Giovanni LA VIA related to 2015/2132(BUD)
Plenary speeches (2)
2016 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0333/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez) IT
General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (debate) IT
Amendments (6)
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Deeply regrets that the Council has proposed budget cuts which appear to be of horizontal nature to some important programmes, in particular on the Third programme for the Union's action in the field of health (2014-2020), on lines pertaining to food and feed safety, and on disaster prevention and preparedness within the Union; in the context of the accession of the Union to international conventions (e.g. the Nagoya Protocol); refuses the reduction of the corresponding budgetary lines proposed by the Council;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Recalls that, in general, the level of resources allocated to budgetary lines that are in the remit of this committee has to be maintained at the level of the year 2015; calls therefore for the initial amounts indicated in the draft budget to be fully restored for all programmes and financing instruments in the remit of this committee;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Recalls that the Union Civil Protection Mechanism is a cornerstone of Union solidarity; recalls that the primary responsibility for the protection of people, as well as the environment and property, including cultural heritage, lies with Member States; underlines that the Union plays an "enabling role" to support, coordinate or supplement the actions of Member States in the prevention of, preparedness for, and response to disasters; welcomes the slight increase in the commitments for this programme proposed by the Commission, but deeply regrets the Council's proposal to reduce the budget of that line;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. CTakes note of the result of the Commission pre-assessment of the implementability of PPs proposed by Members of the ENVI Committee and which generally reflect ENVI Committee priorities in the area of environment and health; calls on the Commission to set up a follow-up procedure to keep Parliament informed of the progress and level of implementation of PPs and PAs.
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 67 b (new)
Paragraph 67 b (new)
67b. Stresses that Parliament and the Council must address the need for a roadmap to a single seat, as requested by a large majority in this Parliament in several resolutions, in order to create long term savings in the Union budget;