Progress: Procedure completed
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: definitive adoption of the European Union’s general budget for 2016.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2016/150 of the European Union’s general budget for the financial year 2016.
CONTENT: the European Parliament voted to adopt the 2016 EU budget, in accordance with the overall compromise reached in the Conciliation Committee under the budgetary procedure of 14 November 2015.
The 2016 budget is the 3rd annual budget under the multiannual financial framework (MFF) for the EU for 2014-2020. It provides the EU with the financial means to boost growth, create jobs and tackle the migration crisis .
Budget 2016 :
commitment appropriations : the overall level of commitment appropriations in the 2016 budget is set at EUR 155 billion , a reduction of 4.5% compared to 2015, leaving a margin below the MFF ceilings for 2016 of EUR 2.331 billion in commitment appropriations; payment appropriations : the overall level of payment appropriations in the 2016 budget is set at EUR 143.885 billion, an increase of 1.8% compared to 2015 .
Some key features of the 2016 budget include :
more than EUR 4 billion to address the refugee crisis both in the EU and in the countries where refugees are coming from; EUR 69.8 billion in commitments will be to stimulate growth, employment and competitiveness ; EUR 2 billion in commitments and EUR 500 million in payments for the guarantee fund of the European Fund for Strategic Investments ( EFSI ), to unlock EUR 315 billion in investment for Europe; increasing competitiveness through research and innovation with programmes like Horizon 2020 (EUR 10 billion in payments in 2016, up 11.6% from 2015); EUR 1.8 billion in payments (30% more than 2015) for Erasmus+, the European programme for education, training, youth and sport, which will help over 4 million people to work and study across the EU in 2014-2020.
Budget 2016 - amounts by headings :
Heading 1: Smart and inclusive growth : this heading is allocated EUR 69.841 billion in commitments and EUR 66.262 in payments. It comprises two specific sub-headings:
1a: Competitiveness for growth and jobs : this sub-heading sees an increase of 8.3% compared to 2015 commitments. The commitments are set at EUR 19.01 billion for Horizon 2020, COSME and ERASMUS +. This sub-heading has been strengthened following the Parliament-Council budget negotiations. Payments were set at EUR 17.4 billion (nearly an 11% increase from 2015; 1b: Economic, social and territorial cohesion : commitments decreased by 15.8% compared to 2015. Commitments have been set at EUR 50.8 billion. This amount corresponds to the amount proposed by the Commission in its draft budget as amended by letters of amendment Nos. 1/2016 and 2/2016 . Payments amounted to EUR 48.85 billion.
Heading 2: Sustainable Growth: natural resources : this heading is characterised by commitments of set at EUR 62.5 billion, of which EUR 42.2 billion are available for market expenditure and direct aids to farmers. The Commission will update this section’s amounts to reflect the latest needs for agricultural expenditure. The payments were set at EUR 42.2 billion. Overall commitments and payments decreased by 2.8% compared to 2015.
Heading 3: Security and citizens : this heading is the one that was most strongly enhanced with the amount raised by some 60.7% compared to 2015 with EUR 4.05 billion to address, inter alia, the migration crisis. Payments are recorded at EUR 3.02 billion showing an increase of 56.8%. The overall increase under this heading was made possible thanks to the mobilisation of the flexibility instrument for migration amounting to EUR 1.506 billion for the entire heading.
Heading 4: Global Europe : this heading amounted to EUR 9.16 billion in commitments and includes programmes such as Pre-Accession Instrument, the European Neighbourhood Instrument, the Instrument for Development Cooperation, the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights and the Stability Instrument. Commitments have also been strengthened to fund humanitarian aid to assist asylum seekers. The heading showed an increase of 5.2% compared to 2015 in terms of commitments. Payments amounted to EUR 10.15 billion, an increase of around 36% compared to 2015. This heading also saw the mobilisation of EUR 24 million through the Flexibility Instrument.
Heading 5 and 6: Administration : the level of commitments and payment is set at EUR 8.9 billion. The aim to reduce staff by 5% between 2013 and 2017 has also been taking in consideration.
Special instruments : the 2016 budget is also characterised by a series of financial instruments such as the emergency aid reserve, the European globalisation adjustment fund (EGF), the EU solidarity fund and the flexibility instrument heavily mobilised this year to provide EUR 1.506 billion in commitment appropriations for heading 3 Security and Citizenship and EUR 24 million in commitment appropriations for heading 4 Global Europe.
The European Parliament adopted by 516 votes to 179 with 8 abstentions a legislative resolution on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016 as approved by the Conciliation Committee under the budgetary procedure.
Parliament approved the joint text agreed by the Conciliation Committee, which consisted of the following documents:
list of budget lines not modified, compared to the draft budget or the Council's position; summary figures by financial framework headings; line by line figures on all budget items; consolidated document showing the figures and final text of all lines modified during the conciliation.
In so doing, it instructed its President to declare that the European Union's general budget for the financial year 2016 has been definitively adopted and to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Members confirmed the points issuing from the Conciliation Committee and notably the joint statements by Parliament, the Council and the Commission annexed to the resolution.
These may be summarised as follows;
Joint conclusions:
Budget 2016:
the overall level of commitment appropriations in the 2016 budget is set at EUR 155 004.2 million , leaving a margin below the MFF ceilings for 2016 of EUR 2 331.4 million in commitment appropriations; the overall level of payment appropriations in the 2016 budget is set at EUR 143 885.3 million; the Flexibility Instrument for 2016 is mobilised for an amount of EUR 1 506.0 million in commitment appropriations for heading 3 Security and Citizenship and for an amount of EUR 24.0 million in commitment appropriations for heading 4 Global Europe;
On its part, the Commission estimated the 2016 payment appropriations related to the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument in 2014, 2015 and 2016 at EUR 832.8 million.
Budget 2015: with regard to 2015, this is amended in accordance with Draft Amending Budget 8/2015 and is accepted as proposed by the Commission.
Specific points concerning budget lines in 2016:
- decentralised agencies : the EU contribution (in commitment appropriations and in payment appropriations) and the number of posts for all decentralised agencies are set at the level proposed by the Commission in the Draft Budget, as amended by Amending Letters 1 and 2/2016. Certain adjustments were agreed with regard to some agencies, such as the Increase of establishment plan posts for the European Chemicals Agency, the European Aviation Safety Agency, the European Medicines Agency, the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators, the Fundamental Rights Agency, Eurojust, the European Banking Authority and eu.LISA;
- pilot projects/preparatory actions : a comprehensive package of 89 pilot projects/preparatory actions for an amount of EUR 64.9 million in commitment appropriations is agreed, as proposed by the Parliament;
- Heading 1a: the amounts for Horizon 2020, COSME and ERASMUS + were increased. As a consequence, the agreed level of commitments is set at EUR 19 010.0 million.
- Heading 2: commitment appropriations are set at the level proposed by the Commission in the Draft Budget, as amended by Amending Letters 1 and 2/2016 with a further reduction of EUR 140.0 million. The agreed level of commitments is set at EUR 62 484.2 million, leaving a margin of EUR 1 777.8 million under the expenditure ceiling of heading 2.
- Heading 3: Commitment appropriations are set at the level proposed by the Commission in the Draft Budget, as amended by Amending Letters 1 and 2/2016, and integrating the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument for migration . Consequently, the agreed level of commitments is set at EUR 4 052.0 million, with no margin left under the expenditure ceiling of heading 3 and the mobilisation of EUR 1 506.0 million through the Flexibility Instrument.
- Heading 4: commitment appropriations are set at the level proposed by the Commission in the Draft Budget, as amended by Amending Letters 1 and 2/2016, integrating certain increases for budget lines linked to migration policy and European neighbourhood policy and EU humanitarian policy, for a total amount of EUR 132.3 million . Accordingly, the agreed level of commitments is set at EUR 9 167.0 million, with no margin left under the expenditure ceiling of heading 4 and the mobilisation of EUR 24.0 million through the Flexibility Instrument.
- Heading 5: the number of posts in the establishment plans of the Institutions and the appropriations proposed by the Commission in the Draft Budget as amended by Amending Letters 1 and 2/2016 are approved, with the following exceptions: the European Parliament for which its reading is approved, (with a reduction of 9 posts); court of Justice (+ 7 posts). As a consequence, the agreed level of commitments is set at EUR 8 935.2 million, leaving a margin of EUR 547.8 million under the expenditure ceiling of heading 5.
- Solidarity Funds : commitment appropriations include the mobilisation of EUR 50 million of the European Union Solidarity Fund for the payment of the advances.
- Payment appropriations : the overall level of payment appropriations in the 2016 budget is set at EUR 143 885.3 million, including EUR 832.8 million related to the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument. The payment appropriations expenditure are reduced by EUR 460.1 million.
Joint declarations : the following joint declarations were approved:
- The Youth Employment Initiative : the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission recall that reducing youth unemployment remains a high and shared political priority. In the framework of the MFF mid-term review/revision they decided that the Commission would draw lessons from the results of the YEI evaluation, accompanied, as appropriate, by proposals for the continuation of the initiative until 2020.
- Payment forecast 2016-2020 : the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission acknowledge the steps taken to phase out the backlog of outstanding payment claims from the 2007-2013 cohesion programmes, and to improve the monitoring of any backlog of unpaid bills in all headings. They reiterate their commitment to prevent a similar build-up of backlog in the future, including through setting-up an early warning system. They undertake to actively monitor the state of implementation of the 2016 budget, so that the appropriations provided in the budget 2016 will allow the Commission to reduce the year-end backlog of outstanding payment claims for the 2007-2013 cohesion programmes to a level of around EUR 2 billion by the end of 2016 . They should also take stock of payment implementation at least three times in 2016 at the political level.
The European Parliament delegation to the Conciliation Committee adopted the report by José Manuel FERNANDES (EPP, PT) (Section III – Commission) and Gérard DEPREZ (ALDE, BE) (other sections) on the joint text on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016 approved by the Conciliation Committee under the budgetary procedure.
In general, members approved the joint text agreed by the Conciliation Committee, which consisted of the following documents:
list of budget lines not modified, compared to the draft budget or the Council's position; summary figures by financial framework headings; line by line figures on all budget items; consolidated document showing the figures and final text of all lines modified during the conciliation.
Members confirmed the joint statements by Parliament, the Council and the Commission annexed to this draft resolution.
Joint conclusions : these cover the following sections:
Budget 2016; Budget 2015 and Amending Budget 8/2015; Joint statements.
Budget 2016 : according to the elements for joint conclusions:
the overall level of commitment appropriations in the 2016 budget is set at EUR 155 004.2 million, leaving a margin below the MFF ceilings for 2016 of EUR 2 331.4 million in commitment appropriations; the overall level of payment appropriations in the 2016 budget is set at EUR 143 885.3 million; the Flexibility Instrument for 2016 is mobilised for an amount of EUR 1 506.0 million in commitment appropriations for heading 3 Security and Citizenship and for an amount of EUR 24.0 million in commitment appropriations for heading 4 Global Europe; the 2016 payment appropriations related to the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument in 2014, 2015 and 2016 are estimated by the Commission at EUR 832.8 million.
Budget 2015 : Draft Amending Budget 8/2015 is accepted as proposed by the Commission.
It should be noted that the annex to the draft resolution shows details of the figures and final text of all lines modified during the conciliation (including in terms of human resources within the European institutions).
A joint statement was made on the issue of payments in which it is stated that the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission will, throughout the year, actively monitor the state of implementation of the 2016 budget.
The European Parliament adopted by 434 votes to 185 with 80 abstentions, a resolution on the Council position on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016.
Section III – Commission : Parliament stressed that its reading of the 2016 budget fully reflected the political priorities adopted by an overwhelming majority in its resolutions of 11 March 2015 on general guidelines and of 8 July 2015 on a mandate for the trilogues .
These priorities were;
internal and external solidarity, in particular an effective tackling of the migration and refugee crisis; boosting competitiveness through the creation of decent and quality employment and the development of enterprises and entrepreneurship across the Union (the “three Es”);
It highlighted that the Union was currently facing a number of serious emergencies , notably the unprecedented migration and refugee crisis to which was necessary to respond not only with financial resources but also with a comprehensive approach to address both the internal and external dimension.
Migration crisis : Parliament considered that extraordinary times required extraordinary measures. It asked the Commission to come up with a proposal on how the EU budget could prompt Member States towards a more balanced approach to solidarity.
Parliament recalled its earlier statements on the handling of migration flows. It decides, therefore, to immediately put forward a comprehensive package of amendments increasing the Draft Budget (DB) by EUR 1 161 million both on Heading 3 (Security and Citizenship) and Heading 4 (Global Europe), in order to provide an initial response to the migration crisis. Those amendments should be considered alongside the Commission’s Letter of amendment No 2/2016, which includes, in addition to the second relocation package, the additional measures set out in the abovementioned Commission communication of 23 September 2015. Members regretted that Parliament and the Council did not have more time to examine the suitability of that Letter but stressed that Parliament fully endorsed these new measures and intended to defend their financing through fresh appropriations. Members also decided to take action with regard to the ongoing crisis affecting European farmers, notably in the dairy sector, and to already integrate in its position on the 2016 budget the EUR 500 million support emergency measures announced by the Commission.
New measures on the European economy : Parliament considered that a lot more effort needed to be undertaken to address the shortcomings in the Union economy by boosting competitiveness, growth and quality jobs. It reinforced therefore the COSME programme by EUR 16.5 million. It decided also to propose new commitments in 2016 for the continuation of the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI), and adopted, therefore, a EUR 473.2 million increase for 2016.
Payments: Parliament stressed the importance of fully respecting the joint statement on a payment plan 2015-2016 agreed between Parliament, Council and Commission, following the shared commitment to reduce the backlog of outstanding payment claims for the 2007-2013 cohesion programmes to around EUR 2 billion by the end of 2016. It criticised, in this respect, the fact that the Council's proposed cuts are in direct contradiction with this payment plan. It restored all cuts proposed by Council to the Draft Budget (EUR 563.6 million in commitments and EUR 1 421.8 million in payments) and stated that it failed to understand the reasoning behind the proposed cuts.
Parliament’s position : Members concluded that, for the purpose of adequately financing these pressing needs, all means available in the MFF Regulation in terms of flexibility, including the full mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument, would need to be deployed.
It set the overall level of appropriations for 2016 at:
EUR 157 427,3 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 146 459,3 million in payment appropriations.
With regard to each sub-heading, Parliament stated as follows:
Sub-heading 1a: Parliament criticised the fact that, again this year, sub-heading 1a is severely affected by the Council's cuts with a reduction of EUR 140.9 million in commitments and EUR 435.4 million in payments as compared to the Draft Budget; around half of these cuts are targeted at Horizon 2020, which results in a further reduction for this programme in 2016 after that part of its appropriations have been redeployed to EFSI. Accordingly, Parliament decided to propose some selective increases above the level of the DB for COSME, Horizon 2020, EaSI and Erasmus+ programmes. It increased the level of commitment and payments appropriations for sub-heading 1a above the DB by EUR 1 405.5 million and EUR 491.5 million respectively (including pilot projects and preparatory actions), thus exceeding the ceiling for commitments by EUR 1 316.9 million, to be financed by all means available as regards flexibility in the MFF Regulation after exhaustion of the available margins;
Sub-heading 1b : Parliament disapproved of Council's proposed cuts of EUR 3.1 million in commitments and, more importantly, EUR 220.1 million in payments under sub-heading 1b, including on completion lines. Taking account of pilot projects and preparatory actions, it increased commitment appropriations for sub-heading 1b by EUR 482.7 million and payment appropriations by EUR 1 164 million above the Draft Budget, thus exceeding the ceiling for commitments by EUR 467.3 million to be financed by any means available as regards flexibility; Heading 2: Parliament welcomed the presentation by the Commission of a EUR 500 million comprehensive package of emergency measures to support European farmers, notably in the dairy sector amid falling commodity prices and greater milk production. It stressed the increasing tasks assigned to the Union as part of the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund, and therefore restored the level of appropriations of the 2015 budget for scientific advice in fisheries. Parliament increased therefore commitment appropriations by EUR 510.4 million and payment appropriations by EUR 520.6 million leaving a margin of EUR 647.2 million below the ceiling for commitments in Heading 2; Heading 3: in light of the current exceptional flows of migrants and refugees, Parliament decided to concentrate its reinforcements on strengthening the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF), to incorporate the necessary funds in its reading, and to align the first relocation package with the second one by adding EUR 20 million to finance transport costs (EUR 500 per migrant to Italy and Greece). It approved an additional increase of EUR 79 million for general reinforcement of the AMIF and recalled that point 17 of IIA allows for an increase of more than 10 % in the amount envisaged for the entire duration of a programme when the new, objective, long-term circumstances arise. Parliament noted that its reading exceeded the ceiling of Heading 3 by EUR 1 055.1 million in commitments, with EUR 931.1 million above the Draft Budget. It proposed, therefore, to mobilise any means available in the MFF to finance the package of reinforcements linked to migration. Heading 4 : Parliament pointed out that, of all headings, Heading 4 bears the biggest cuts by the Council both in commitments (- EUR 163,4 million) and in payments (- EUR 450,4 million). It decided to restore the level of appropriations provided for by the Draft Budget , reaffirming that the increases in payment appropriations proposed by the Commission were merely necessary , notwithstanding the unprecedented migration and refugee crisis. It complemented the package of amendments on migration and the refugee crisis by adopting targeted reinforcements in commitment appropriations first and foremost within the European Neighbourhood Instrument (+ EUR 178,1 million) and also in the Development Cooperation Instrument (+ EUR 26,6 million), Humanitarian aid (+ EUR 26 million), the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (+ EUR 11,2 million), the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace (+ EUR 12,6 million) and the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (+ EUR 1 million). It stressed, however, that this ceiling might be insufficient given that it has been set well before major developments in Ukraine, Syria, Tunisia and more generally throughout the neighbouring countries, the Middle East and Africa. Heading 5 : noting the Council cuts in this heading, Parliament decided to restore the Draft Budget on all the lines of administrative and research support expenditure in policy areas and on all the lines in Heading 5 decreased by the Council, as well as to approve a limited number of small reinforcements.
Agencies : Parliament decided to increase, within the overall package on migration, the appropriations for the main agencies working in this field: the European Asylum Support Office, Frontex, Europol, Eurojust, eu.LISA, Cepol and the Fundamental Rights Agency for a total of EUR 26 million.
Other sections : with regard to its own budget , Parliament recalled that EUR 15 million has been earmarked for urgent investments in security and cybersecurity, setting the overall level of its 2016 budget at EUR 1 838 648 600 as adopted in Plenary on 29 April 2015. In an oral amendments adopted in Plenary, Parliament stated that, in order to ensure adequate support to Members for the accomplishment of their parliamentary activities, a new balance is necessary between accredited parliamentary assistants and local assistants, and it welcomed the agreement reached in the Bureau.
It should be noted that a replacement resolution presented by the ECR group was rejected in plenary by 65 votes to 580 with 49 abstentions.
The Committee on Budgets adopted the report by José Manuel FERNANDES (EPP, PT) (Section III – Commission) and Gérard DEPREZ (ALDE, BE) (other sections). The committee approved the motion for a resolution on the Council position on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016.
Firstly, the report stressed that Parliament's reading of the 2016 budget fully reflects the political priorities such as internal and external solidarity, in particular:
an effective tackling of the migration and refugee crisis ; as well as in boosting competitiveness through the creation of decent and quality employment and the development of enterprises and entrepreneurship across the Union (the “three Es”).
Highlighting that the Union is currently facing a number of serious emergencies, Members stressed the urgent need for necessary financial resources to be deployed in the Union budget, in order to match these political challenges.
Overall, Members set the overall level of appropriations for 2016 at EUR 157 427.5 million and EUR 146 459.5 million in commitment and payment appropriations respectively .
The keys areas dealt with in the report are as follows:
Migrant crisis : in this regard, they decided, therefore, to immediately put forward a comprehensive package of amendments increasing the Draft Budget (DB) by EUR 1 161 million both on Heading 3 (Security and Citizenship) and Heading 4 (Global Europe), in order to provide an initial response to the migration crisis .
Union economy : Members stressed that more effort are needed to be undertaken to address the shortcomings in the Union economy by boosting competitiveness, growth and quality jobs. Therefore, they:
reinforced the COSME programme by EUR 16.5 million; adopted a EUR 473.2 million increase for 2016 for the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI); restored all cuts (especially to Horizon 2020 and the Connecting Europe Facility) proposed by Council to the DB (EUR 563.6 million in commitments and EUR 1 421.8 million in payments).
As regards dairy farmers , Members decided to take action with regard to the ongoing crisis affecting European farmers, notably in the dairy sector, and to already integrate in its position on the 2016 budget the EUR 500 million support emergency measures announced by the Commission.
Payments : Members reiterated the importance of the joint payment plan 2015-2016 agreed, ahead of the budgetary procedure, by Parliament, the Council and the Commission, which reflects the commitment of the three institutions to reduce the backlog of outstanding payments . They decided to restore the DB in payments on all lines cut by the Council , on the assumption that the payment levels proposed by the Commission in its DB are the ones needed to achieve the objectives of the payment plan.
They reinforced, by an appropriate ratio, payment appropriations on all those lines which are amended in commitment appropriations, taking into account areas with a fast disbursement profile or a high degree of urgency namely Erasmus+, the two relocation schemes, UNRWA and humanitarian aid. They increased payment appropriations by a further EUR 1 billion to fully cover by fresh appropriations the frontloading of payments for Greece. They also decided to increase payments for the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund.
PURPOSE: presentation of Amending Letter N°2 to the draft general budget 2016 - updating of the estimated needs for agricultural expenditure and fisheries Managing the refugee crisis: immediate budgetary measures under the European Agenda on Migration.
CONTENT: this Amending Letter No 2 (AL2) to the draft budget for the year 2016 covers the following:
- the updating of the estimated needs, assigned revenue and appropriations for agricultural expenditure. In addition to changing market factors, the AL 2/2016 also incorporates the impact of decisions in the agricultural sector since the draft budget (DB) 2016 was presented in May 2015 as well as other proposals expected to have a significant effect during the budget year. After taking into account of the additional revenue assigned to the EAGF, the net result for heading 2 is a decrease of EUR 477.3 million for both commitment and payment appropriations ;
- an update of the situation for Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreements, to take account of the latest estimates, on the basis of which the necessary expenditure is EUR 11 million lower , for both commitment and payment appropriations, than originally estimated;
- the necessary reinforcements for immediate measures to manage the refugee crisis under the European Agenda on Migration, building on the measures proposed in draft amending budget 7/2015, as follows:
· Heading 3: Security and Citizenship : a reinforcement of emergency assistance in favour of Member States more exposed, the increased capacity of the three front-line agencies, as well as the integration of the two relocation decisions taken in September 2015 and the need for a further top-up of funding under the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) and the Internal Security Fund (ISF). Altogether, the proposed measures for 2016 require a reinforcement of EUR 1 380 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 778.8 million in payment appropriations. Consequently, the Commission proposes to mobilise the Flexibility Instrument for an amount of EUR 1 504 million in heading 3. This includes EUR 124 million, which the Commission already proposed to mobilise from the Flexibility Instrument together with the initial draft budget 2016; such a proposal is now repealed and replaced by the new draft act accompanying this amending letter.
· Heading 4: Global Europe : an increase for Humanitarian Aid of EUR 150 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 405 million in payment appropriations, and a reinforcement of the payment appropriations for the European Neighbourhood Instrument of EUR 210 million.
· Heading 5: Administration : an increase of EUR 23.9 million in commitment and payment appropriations to cover salaries and missions.
- an increase of EUR 5 million in commitment and payment appropriations to cover the fees obligations towards the European Investment Fund (EIF) for the implementation of the new small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) window products under the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI).
- a budgetary neutral amendment to the structure of the establishment plan of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER);
- a reduction of EUR 20 million in payment appropriations under the Food and Feed programme.
The net budgetary impact of these changes across all headings is an increase in commitment appropriations of EUR 1 070.6 million, and in payment appropriations of EUR 914.5 million .
On 4 September 2015, the Council adopted its position on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016.
Following the discussions in Council, the main features of this position may be summarised as follows:
EUR 153 268.84 million in commitment appropriations;
EUR 142 119.62 million in payment appropriations.
Under the Council's position, commitment appropriations decrease by 5.36% compared to the 2015 budget and payment appropriations increase by 0.59%.
The total amount of payment appropriations provided for in the Council's position on the DB for 2016 corresponds to 0.97% of the EU gross national income (GNI) .
A. Principles : when adopting its position on the DB for 2016, the Council took into account the following principles:
to work within the framework of the budget guidelines established for the 2016 budget in the Council conclusions adopted in February 2015 (5310/2015); to follow an approach leading to a budget complying with budgetary discipline and sound financial management, as well as taking duly into account the ongoing economic and budgetary constraints in Member States; to provide adequate funding for the European Union's various priorities, determining appropriations on the basis of past and current budget implementation and realistic absorption capacities; to foresee the appropriations necessary to respect the agreement reached on a payment plan for 2015-2016; to comply with the agreement reached on the financing of the European Fund for Strategic Investments as far as the budget for 2016 is concerned; to provide the appropriations necessary to implement the European Council conclusions of April and June 2015 on measures in the area of migration; to foresee the necessary appropriations enabling the smooth implementation of the new programmes in the third year of the MFF 2014-2020; to leave adequate margins under the ceilings of the headings and subheadings of the MFF, with the exception of sub-heading 1b and heading 3, in order to be able to cope with unforeseen situations; to keep payment appropriations firmly under control in all headings and sub-headings of the MFF and to create a sufficient margin to cover unforeseen events, resulting in a reduction in payment appropriations in particular under (sub-)headings 1a, 1b, 2 and 4 .
Administrative expenditure : as regards administrative expenditure of the institutions, the Council recalls the importance of limiting the increase in 2016 and of reducing staff in line with the -5 % target over the period 2013-2017 set in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013 on budgetary discipline.
In this context, the administrative budgets of the institutions were examined on the following basis:
to keep under strict control the volume of administrative expenditure of the institutions, in line with the approach followed by the Member States for their national civil services; to set the administrative budget of each institution at the appropriate level, taking into account their specificities and real and justified needs; to carry out targeted reductions and increase the flat rate abatement on salaries for some institutions and offices, taking into account their past and current budget implementation and vacancy rates; to apply the Commission's proposal to reduce staff by 1% per year as from 2013.
Decentralised agencies : as regards decentralised agencies, the Council reduced the overall level of contributions from the Union budget by EUR 5.1 million in commitment appropriations and by EUR 5.3 million in payment appropriations. Agencies at cruising speed for which contributions from the Union budget would have increased in comparison to their respective 2015 budgets were affected by those reductions.
The Council took note of the Commission's monitoring of the progress towards the 5% staff reduction target already achieved to date by a number of institutions, bodies and agencies. It called on all institutions and bodies to continue implementing the remaining staff reduction until the end of the five year period 2013-2017.
Declaration on payment appropriations : he Council approved the following statement on payment appropriations: "The Council will carefully examine the letter of amendment for agriculture (including information on assigned revenue) in order to appropriately assess the level of resources under heading 2 (Sustainable growth: natural resources) in the 2016 budget. In line with the joint statement on a payment plan 2015-2016, the Council calls on the Commission to continue closely scrutinizing the implementation of the 2014-2020 programmes. To that end, it invites the Commission to present in a timely manner updated figures concerning the state of affairs and estimates regarding 2016 payment appropriations with a view to allowing the budgetary authority to take any necessary decisions in due time for justified needs."
B. Expenditure by main budget headings :
Heading 1: Smart and inclusive growth: EUR 69 559 million in commitments :
1a) Competitiveness for growth and jobs : the amount is set at EUR 18 781 million in commitments, an increase of 7% compared to 2015.
The sub-heading is characterised by the following elements:
establish the level of commitment appropriations, targeting a total reduction of EUR 140.9 million in the appropriations requested in the DB for 2016 on a number of specific budget lines including administrative support expenditure; this includes the use of the global margin for commitments for an amount of EUR 543.0 million under this sub-heading as proposed in letter of amendment No 1/2016; set the level of payment appropriations, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB for 2016 by a total amount of EUR 435.4 million , of which EUR 110.0 million in Large Infrastructure Projects, EUR 219.1 million in the Common Strategic Framework for Research and Innovation, EUR 13.7 million in Employment and Social Innovation, EUR 26.5 million in Customs, Fiscalis and Anti-Fraud, EUR 21.4 million in the Connecting Europe Facility, EUR 5.0 million in Energy projects to aid economic recovery, EUR 17.5 million in actions financed under the prerogatives of the Commission and specific competences conferred to the Commission and -EUR 18.0 million in other programmes; the amounts mentioned above also take into account reductions in contributions to decentralised agencies for a total amount of EUR 4 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 4.1 million in payment appropriations under this sub-heading.
The margin available under sub-heading 1a is EUR 229.5 million.
1b) Economic, social and territorial cohesion : the Council provided EUR 50 818 million in commitments (a decrease of 15.9% compared to 2015). Other main features of this sub-heading include:
establish the level of commitment appropriations, targeting a total reduction by EUR 3.1 million in the appropriations requested in the DB for 2016 on a number of specific budget lines related to administrative support expenditure under this sub-heading; set the level of payment appropriations, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB for 2016 for programmes under the new programming period by a total amount of EUR 220.1 million , in particular in the field of Transition regions (EUR 5.1 million), Competitiveness (More developed regions) (EUR 109.7 million), the Cohesion fund (EUR 42.2 million), European territorial cooperation (EUR 43.5 million) and Technical assistance and innovative actions (EUR 19.6 million).
The margin available under sub-heading 1b is EUR 18.5 million.
Heading 2: Sustainable growth: natural resources : the amount for this heading is set at EUR 62 904 million in commitments. This is a reduction of 1.56% compared to 2015. Market-related expenditure and direct payments shall represent EUR 42.7 billion.
The heading is characterised by the following elements:
reduce the level of commitment appropriations requested in the DB for 2016 by EUR 199.9 million on administrative support expenditure lines, on operational lines under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and the Programme for Environment and Climate Action (LIFE); reduce the appropriations requested in the DB for 2016 by a total amount of EUR 251.1 million , of which EUR 198.9 million in the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund, EUR 45.6 million in the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, EUR 4.5 million in the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund, and EUR 2.1 million in the LIFE programme. These amounts, estimated on the basis of information currently available, may be reviewed in the light of the letter of amendment on agriculture expected in the autumn. The amounts mentioned above also take into account reductions in contributions to decentralised agencies for an additional amount of -EUR 0.05 million in commitment and payment appropriations under this heading.
The margin available under heading 2 is EUR 1 357.5 million.
Heading 3: Security and citizenship : the amount of this heading is set at EUR 2 644 million in appropriations and sees an increase of 8.71% compared to the 2015 budget. This heading is characterised by the following:
establish the level of commitment appropriations with a total reduction of EUR 25.1 million of the appropriations requested in the DB for 2016 on a number of budget lines concerning administrative support expenditure and operational expenditure for new programmes; set the level of payment appropriations, including a total reduction of EUR 33.6 million of the appropriations requested in the DB for 2016 on a number of budget lines concerning administrative support expenditure (EUR 200 000) and operational expenditure for new programmes (EUR 32.3 million); the amounts mentioned above also take into account reductions in contributions to decentralised agencies of EUR 1.1 million in commitment and payment appropriations under this heading.
The margin under heading 3 is equal to zero and is left unchanged . Therefore, the Flexibility Instrument is mobilised for an amount of EUR 98.9 million in commitment appropriations. The amount serves to complement the financing of the temporary and exceptional relocation over two years from the frontline Member States Italy and Greece to other Member States of 40 000 persons in clear need of international protection.
Heading 4: Global Europe : the Council lays down an amount of EUR 8 718 million in commitments, an increase of 3.65% compared to 2015. It also decided to:
establish the level of commitment appropriations, targeting a total reduction by EUR 163.4 million in the appropriations requested in the DB for 2016 on a number of specific budget lines; set the level of payment appropriations, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB for 2016 by a total amount of EUR 450.4 million, of which: EUR 119.1 million in the Instrument for Pre-accession assistance, EUR 100.3 million in the European Neighbourhood Instrument, EUR 143.0 million in the Development Cooperation Instrument, EUR 11.0 million in the Partnership instrument for cooperation with third countries, EUR 25.1 million in the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights, EUR 44.1 million in the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace, EUR 2.3 million in the Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation, EUR 0.05 million in the EU Aid Volunteers initiative and EUR 5.6 million in other actions and programmes.
The margin available under heading 4 is EUR 424.7 million.
Heading 5: Administrative expenditure : the administrative expenditure amounts to EUR 8 877 million , an increase of 2.51%. Each institution’s budget is set out in the Council position with the budget variations from year to year.
As regards staff levels, the Council accepted the establishment plans as proposed by the Commission in the DB for 2016.
The margin available under heading 5 is EUR 605.5 million.
Decentralised agencies : as regards decentralised agencies, the Council reduced the overall level of appropriations by -EUR 7 million. Only some of the agencies whose budgets increased in comparison to their respective 2014 budgets are affected by those reductions. The Council considered that the absorption capacities for these agencies will be lower than the forecasts made by the Commission.
Special instruments : lastly, the Council accepted the amounts in commitment and payment appropriations proposed by the Commission in the DB for 2016 concerning the Emergency Aid Reserve, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund and the European Union Solidarity Fund.
On 4 September 2015, the Council adopted its position on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016.
Following the discussions in Council, the main features of this position may be summarised as follows:
EUR 153 268.84 million in commitment appropriations;
EUR 142 119.62 million in payment appropriations.
Under the Council's position, commitment appropriations decrease by 5.36% compared to the 2015 budget and payment appropriations increase by 0.59%.
The total amount of payment appropriations provided for in the Council's position on the DB for 2016 corresponds to 0.97% of the EU gross national income (GNI) .
A. Principles : when adopting its position on the DB for 2016, the Council took into account the following principles:
to work within the framework of the budget guidelines established for the 2016 budget in the Council conclusions adopted in February 2015 (5310/2015); to follow an approach leading to a budget complying with budgetary discipline and sound financial management, as well as taking duly into account the ongoing economic and budgetary constraints in Member States; to provide adequate funding for the European Union's various priorities, determining appropriations on the basis of past and current budget implementation and realistic absorption capacities; to foresee the appropriations necessary to respect the agreement reached on a payment plan for 2015-2016; to comply with the agreement reached on the financing of the European Fund for Strategic Investments as far as the budget for 2016 is concerned; to provide the appropriations necessary to implement the European Council conclusions of April and June 2015 on measures in the area of migration; to foresee the necessary appropriations enabling the smooth implementation of the new programmes in the third year of the MFF 2014-2020; to leave adequate margins under the ceilings of the headings and subheadings of the MFF, with the exception of sub-heading 1b and heading 3, in order to be able to cope with unforeseen situations; to keep payment appropriations firmly under control in all headings and sub-headings of the MFF and to create a sufficient margin to cover unforeseen events, resulting in a reduction in payment appropriations in particular under (sub-)headings 1a, 1b, 2 and 4 .
Administrative expenditure : as regards administrative expenditure of the institutions, the Council recalls the importance of limiting the increase in 2016 and of reducing staff in line with the -5 % target over the period 2013-2017 set in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013 on budgetary discipline.
In this context, the administrative budgets of the institutions were examined on the following basis:
to keep under strict control the volume of administrative expenditure of the institutions, in line with the approach followed by the Member States for their national civil services; to set the administrative budget of each institution at the appropriate level, taking into account their specificities and real and justified needs; to carry out targeted reductions and increase the flat rate abatement on salaries for some institutions and offices, taking into account their past and current budget implementation and vacancy rates; to apply the Commission's proposal to reduce staff by 1% per year as from 2013.
Decentralised agencies : as regards decentralised agencies, the Council reduced the overall level of contributions from the Union budget by EUR 5.1 million in commitment appropriations and by EUR 5.3 million in payment appropriations. Agencies at cruising speed for which contributions from the Union budget would have increased in comparison to their respective 2015 budgets were affected by those reductions.
The Council took note of the Commission's monitoring of the progress towards the 5% staff reduction target already achieved to date by a number of institutions, bodies and agencies. It called on all institutions and bodies to continue implementing the remaining staff reduction until the end of the five year period 2013-2017.
Declaration on payment appropriations : he Council approved the following statement on payment appropriations: "The Council will carefully examine the letter of amendment for agriculture (including information on assigned revenue) in order to appropriately assess the level of resources under heading 2 (Sustainable growth: natural resources) in the 2016 budget. In line with the joint statement on a payment plan 2015-2016, the Council calls on the Commission to continue closely scrutinizing the implementation of the 2014-2020 programmes. To that end, it invites the Commission to present in a timely manner updated figures concerning the state of affairs and estimates regarding 2016 payment appropriations with a view to allowing the budgetary authority to take any necessary decisions in due time for justified needs."
B. Expenditure by main budget headings :
Heading 1: Smart and inclusive growth: EUR 69 559 million in commitments :
1a) Competitiveness for growth and jobs : the amount is set at EUR 18 781 million in commitments, an increase of 7% compared to 2015.
The sub-heading is characterised by the following elements:
establish the level of commitment appropriations, targeting a total reduction of EUR 140.9 million in the appropriations requested in the DB for 2016 on a number of specific budget lines including administrative support expenditure; this includes the use of the global margin for commitments for an amount of EUR 543.0 million under this sub-heading as proposed in letter of amendment No 1/2016; set the level of payment appropriations, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB for 2016 by a total amount of EUR 435.4 million , of which EUR 110.0 million in Large Infrastructure Projects, EUR 219.1 million in the Common Strategic Framework for Research and Innovation, EUR 13.7 million in Employment and Social Innovation, EUR 26.5 million in Customs, Fiscalis and Anti-Fraud, EUR 21.4 million in the Connecting Europe Facility, EUR 5.0 million in Energy projects to aid economic recovery, EUR 17.5 million in actions financed under the prerogatives of the Commission and specific competences conferred to the Commission and -EUR 18.0 million in other programmes; the amounts mentioned above also take into account reductions in contributions to decentralised agencies for a total amount of EUR 4 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 4.1 million in payment appropriations under this sub-heading.
The margin available under sub-heading 1a is EUR 229.5 million.
1b) Economic, social and territorial cohesion : the Council provided EUR 50 818 million in commitments (a decrease of 15.9% compared to 2015). Other main features of this sub-heading include:
establish the level of commitment appropriations, targeting a total reduction by EUR 3.1 million in the appropriations requested in the DB for 2016 on a number of specific budget lines related to administrative support expenditure under this sub-heading; set the level of payment appropriations, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB for 2016 for programmes under the new programming period by a total amount of EUR 220.1 million , in particular in the field of Transition regions (EUR 5.1 million), Competitiveness (More developed regions) (EUR 109.7 million), the Cohesion fund (EUR 42.2 million), European territorial cooperation (EUR 43.5 million) and Technical assistance and innovative actions (EUR 19.6 million).
The margin available under sub-heading 1b is EUR 18.5 million.
Heading 2: Sustainable growth: natural resources : the amount for this heading is set at EUR 62 904 million in commitments. This is a reduction of 1.56% compared to 2015. Market-related expenditure and direct payments shall represent EUR 42.7 billion.
The heading is characterised by the following elements:
reduce the level of commitment appropriations requested in the DB for 2016 by EUR 199.9 million on administrative support expenditure lines, on operational lines under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and the Programme for Environment and Climate Action (LIFE); reduce the appropriations requested in the DB for 2016 by a total amount of EUR 251.1 million , of which EUR 198.9 million in the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund, EUR 45.6 million in the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, EUR 4.5 million in the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund, and EUR 2.1 million in the LIFE programme. These amounts, estimated on the basis of information currently available, may be reviewed in the light of the letter of amendment on agriculture expected in the autumn. The amounts mentioned above also take into account reductions in contributions to decentralised agencies for an additional amount of -EUR 0.05 million in commitment and payment appropriations under this heading.
The margin available under heading 2 is EUR 1 357.5 million.
Heading 3: Security and citizenship : the amount of this heading is set at EUR 2 644 million in appropriations and sees an increase of 8.71% compared to the 2015 budget. This heading is characterised by the following:
establish the level of commitment appropriations with a total reduction of EUR 25.1 million of the appropriations requested in the DB for 2016 on a number of budget lines concerning administrative support expenditure and operational expenditure for new programmes; set the level of payment appropriations, including a total reduction of EUR 33.6 million of the appropriations requested in the DB for 2016 on a number of budget lines concerning administrative support expenditure (EUR 200 000) and operational expenditure for new programmes (EUR 32.3 million); the amounts mentioned above also take into account reductions in contributions to decentralised agencies of EUR 1.1 million in commitment and payment appropriations under this heading.
The margin under heading 3 is equal to zero and is left unchanged . Therefore, the Flexibility Instrument is mobilised for an amount of EUR 98.9 million in commitment appropriations. The amount serves to complement the financing of the temporary and exceptional relocation over two years from the frontline Member States Italy and Greece to other Member States of 40 000 persons in clear need of international protection.
Heading 4: Global Europe : the Council lays down an amount of EUR 8 718 million in commitments, an increase of 3.65% compared to 2015. It also decided to:
establish the level of commitment appropriations, targeting a total reduction by EUR 163.4 million in the appropriations requested in the DB for 2016 on a number of specific budget lines; set the level of payment appropriations, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB for 2016 by a total amount of EUR 450.4 million, of which: EUR 119.1 million in the Instrument for Pre-accession assistance, EUR 100.3 million in the European Neighbourhood Instrument, EUR 143.0 million in the Development Cooperation Instrument, EUR 11.0 million in the Partnership instrument for cooperation with third countries, EUR 25.1 million in the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights, EUR 44.1 million in the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace, EUR 2.3 million in the Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation, EUR 0.05 million in the EU Aid Volunteers initiative and EUR 5.6 million in other actions and programmes.
The margin available under heading 4 is EUR 424.7 million.
Heading 5: Administrative expenditure : the administrative expenditure amounts to EUR 8 877 million , an increase of 2.51%. Each institution’s budget is set out in the Council position with the budget variations from year to year.
As regards staff levels, the Council accepted the establishment plans as proposed by the Commission in the DB for 2016.
The margin available under heading 5 is EUR 605.5 million.
Decentralised agencies : as regards decentralised agencies, the Council reduced the overall level of appropriations by -EUR 7 million. Only some of the agencies whose budgets increased in comparison to their respective 2014 budgets are affected by those reductions. The Council considered that the absorption capacities for these agencies will be lower than the forecasts made by the Commission.
Special instruments : lastly, the Council accepted the amounts in commitment and payment appropriations proposed by the Commission in the DB for 2016 concerning the Emergency Aid Reserve, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund and the European Union Solidarity Fund.
PURPOSE: presentation of amending letter No 1 to the draft general budget 2016 on the financing of the EFSI guarantee fund.
CONTENT: this Amending Letter No 1 (AL1) to the draft budget for the year 2016 reflects the budgetary impact of the political agreement on the financing of the EFSI Guarantee Fund reached between the European Parliament and the Council on 28 May 2015, which facilitated the adoption of the Regulation on the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) on 24 June 2015.
The adoption of the EFSI basic act means that the corresponding appropriations for the provisioning of the Guarantee Fund and the funding of the European Investment Advisory Hub (EIAH) and European Investment Project Portal (IPP) can be transferred from the reserve to the operational lines.
In addition, the Commission proposes to complete the budget structure for the EFSI by creating a new budget article 01 04 07, with a token entry (p.m.), in view of a possible contribution from the EU budget to supplement the fees covering the work carried out by the European Investment Fund (EIF) in the implementation of the new financial instruments under the EFSI.
Overall, the political agreement reduced by EUR 1 billion the redeployment of commitment appropriations from the Horizon 2020 and Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) programmes as initially proposed by the Commission as part of its legislative proposal for the creation of the EFSI, to be compensated by a corresponding increase in the use of the unallocated margin under heading 1a and the Global Margin for Commitments . As part of the political agreement, the Commission stated that it would analyse the potential impact of the contributions to the EFSI from the different budget lines of Horizon 2020 on the effective implementation of the respective programmes.
Consequently, in this Amending Letter the Commission proposes to reduce the 2016 redeployment from a number of budget lines under Horizon 2020 and the Connecting Europe Facility. This leads to an increase of the commitment appropriations for Horizon 2020 by an amount of EUR 153 million and an increase of the commitment appropriations for the Connecting Europe Facility (transport) by an amount of EUR 150 million .
This will be offset by a corresponding increase in the use of the available margins for the provisioning of the EFSI Guarantee Fund:
a decrease of the 2016 unallocated margin under heading 1a by EUR 111.4 million; an increase in the use of the Global Margin for Commitments by EUR 191.6 million.
The net impact of these changes is an increase of EUR 303 million in commitment appropriations compared to the draft budget 2016 . The overall level of payments remains unchanged.
PURPOSE: presentation of the Commission Draft Budget (DB) for 2016 (all section).
BACKGROUND: the draft budget (DB) 2016 is the first EU budget prepared in light of the political guidelines established by Commission President Juncker providing a new start for Europe based on his agenda for Jobs, Growth, Fairness and Democratic change .
The key priority for the 2016 DB is to provide a new boost for jobs, growth and investment . In particular, through the proposed creation of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), the Commission proposes to maximize the use of the EU budget in order to respond to the slower pace of investments.
The EU budget is targeted to the promotion of fairness, positioning the Union as a stronger global actor and moving towards a new policy on migration .
The 2016 DB aims to provide solidarity between Member States and regions through the European Structural and Investment Funds, and help young people to be trained and find jobs using the Youth Employment Initiative . Moreover, the 2016 DB intends to respond to new developments in Europe's neighbourhood (e.g. Ukraine in the East and Syria in the Mediterranean) and the wider world, facing growing migratory pressures in the Southern Mediterranean.
Sound administrative management is maintained in the 2016 DB : the Commission will continue exercising administrative restraint, for instance by reducing its own staff numbers by 1 % for the fourth year in a row. What is new in the 2016 DB is that EU funded policies and actions can finally be fully implemented on the ground once the new legal bases are in place and operational programmes are adopted. Moreover, in 2016 the Commission expects to deal with the backlog of unpaid bills from the past programming period and to be able to make all payments due in the year.
CONTENT: the 2016 draft budget proposed by the Juncker Commission reflects its 10 political priorities defined when it took office. These priorities are pursued within broadly stable annual ceilings under the 2014-2020 MFF and with a renewed emphasis on results to maximise the outcome of the use of scarce resources.
The budget in figures : the 2016 DB is presented as follows:
in terms of commitment appropriations , the total expenditure in the draft budget (DB) 2016 (including the special instruments) is EUR 153 529.5 million , corresponding to 1.04% of GNI, that is EUR – 8 413.3 million below the total expenditure in 2015 (– 5.2%); the payment appropriations (including the special instruments) amount to EUR 143 541.5 million , corresponding to 0.98% of GNI. This represents a moderate increase of 1.6% over the level of payment appropriations in the 2015 budget.
Overall, the proposed level of expenditure for 2016 reflects the expenditure ceilings under the multiannual financial framework, while the amounts for the individual programmes broadly reflect the financial programming for 2016.
However, three major new elements in the draft budget concern: the proposed creation of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) under heading 1a. In addition to redeployment from existing EU funding, the Commission proposes to complete its financing for 2016 by making use of the Global Margin for Commitments, for an amount of EUR 351.4 million; (ii) the proposed mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument to provide additional funding under heading 3 for temporary measures in the area of asylum in Italy and Greece (EUR 150 million); (iii) the proposed reinforcement of operational programmes and decentralised agencies under heading 3 amounting to EUR 123.2 million in commitment appropriations to respond to migratory pressures in 2016.
The main budgetary priorities of 2016 :
- boosting jobs, growth and investments : continued emphasis on innovation and investment is necessary to create more jobs for Europeans and strengthen growth potential. The European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) will support strategic investments of European significance in infrastructure, notably broadband and energy networks, as well as transport infrastructure, particularly in industrial centres; education, research and innovation; and renewable energy and energy efficiency;
- responding to new developments : the 2016 draft budget responds also to the most immediate developments, including crises in neighbourhood countries such as Ukraine and Syria and the related impact on migration, humanitarian aid, security, and the need to make progress towards a new Energy Union with a forward-looking climate change policy as stated in the policy priorities of the new Commission. As regards migration, the draft budget provides additional funding for temporary measures in the area of asylum in Italy and Greece (EUR 150 million) through the proposed mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument, to help relieve the immediate and exceptional pressure on their asylum and migration systems establishing for a duration of 24 months a temporary relocation mechanism of applicants who are in clear need of international protection from Italy and Greece to the other Member States;
- addressing payment needs : implementation of EU policies was hampered by severe constraints in the level of authorised payment appropriations, leading to recurrent amending budgets to cover part of the outstanding needs. The fall in the 2014 payment ceiling led the Commission to propose the mobilisation of the Contingency Margin for payments, which was eventually agreed by Council and Parliament. Despite such a corrective measure, the backlog of outstanding payment claims for the Cohesion policy (heading 1b) reached an unprecedented peak of EUR 24.7 billion at the end of 2014. In order to face this challenge, measures were put in place to ensure an active management of the scarce payment appropriations. The increasing payment ceiling in 2016 (+ 1.9% compared to 2015), combined with the effect of the later than originally planned take off of new programmes under shared management with Member States, creates the necessary room for the payment appropriations which are estimated to be required to phase out the abnormal backlog of outstanding payment claims. As a net result, the level of payment appropriations estimated in the 2016 draft budget (EUR 143.2 billion) represents a moderate increase (+ 1.6%) over the 2015 budget.
- showing administrative restraint : for the fourth consecutive year, the Commission will reduce by 1% its staff levels in 2016, in order to meet the 5% staff reduction over five years which applies to all EU institutions and bodies. It will further reduce its staff level in accordance with the delegation of certain implementing tasks to executive agencies.
KEY BUDGETARY ASPECTS OF THE HEADINGS : the analysis is structured under the 2014-2020 financial framework headings:
Heading 1: Smart and inclusive growth : this heading is broken down into 2 sub-headings:
- Heading 1a: Competitiveness for growth and jobs : commitment appropriations for this heading are set at EUR 18 618.4 million. This is an increase of 6.1% compared to the 2015 budget, which is mostly due to the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) and Erasmus+. This leaves a margin of EUR 200 million, after making use of the Global Margin for Commitments for an amount of EUR 351.4 million in 2016. Payment appropriations increase by 11.4% to EUR 17 518.1 million, in order to address the growing level of outstanding commitments and to ensure the implementation of the new programmes;
- Heading 1b: Economic, social and territorial cohesion : commitment appropriations decrease by – 15.9% to EUR 50 821.7 million, leaving a margin of EUR 15.3 million. Payment appropriations for the heading as a whole decrease by – 4% compared to the 2015 budget, to EUR 49 060.1 million. This reflects the gradual phasing out of payment needs for 2007-2013 programmes, while the 2014-2020 programmes are on their way to progressively reach cruising speed.
Heading 2: Sustainable growth: natural resources : commitment appropriations of EUR 63 104.4 million are proposed for heading 2. This level of expenditure represents a slight reduction compared to the 2015 budget (– 1.2%) and leaves a margin of EUR 1 157.6 million under the ceiling. Payment appropriations amount to EUR 55 865.9 million, with a decrease of – 0.2% compared to 2015. The funding for market related expenditure and direct payments reaches EUR 42 867.6 million in commitment appropriations, and EUR 42 859.3 million in payment appropriations. A margin under the sub-ceiling for market measures and direct payments amounting to EUR 1 081.7 million is left. Payment appropriations for rural development increase by 6.3% compared to the 2015 budget;
Heading 3: Security and citizenship : this heading sees an increase in commitment appropriations of 9.7% to EUR 2.67 million, leaving a margin of EUR – 124 million. This is due to the proposed mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument to provide additional funding for temporary measures in the area of asylum in Italy and Greece (EUR 150 million). Payment appropriations increase by 17.1% to EUR 2 259 million, which is due to the payment appropriations related to the reinforced migration measures, as well as to the growing payment needs of the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund and the Internal Security Fund in general.
Heading 4: Global Europe : this heading sees an increase in commitment appropriations of 5.6% to EUR 8 881.7 million, leaving an unallocated margin of EUR 261.3 million available under the ceiling. Payment appropriations increase by 28.5% to EUR 9 539.2 million, mostly to take account of the rapidly growing level of outstanding commitments under this heading.
Heading 5: Administration (expenditure for all institutions and staff) : commitment and payment appropriations for Administration (heading 5) for all institutions combined including pensions and European schools increase by 2.9%, with commitments set at EUR 8 909 million. Administrative expenditure of all institutions (+ 2.2%) is above the forecast inflation in Brussels (+ 1.3%) and Luxembourg (+ 1.9%) and reflects additional security expenditure in the European Parliament, increased EEAS expenditure in delegations in third countries because of a deteriorating exchange rate and the opening of two new delegations, the budgetary impact of the foreseen reform of the Court of Justice and additional administrative expenditure related to Commission staff relocation from the JMO building in Luxembourg. The requested expenditure for the institutions leaves a margin of EUR 582.9 million under the sub-ceiling for administrative expenditure of the institutions (excluding pensions and European schools).
The 5.2% increase for pensions results from the annual adjustments for 2015 (+ 1.2%) and 2016 (+1.8% on a six month basis), combined with the expected growth (by 3.8%) in the number of staff expected to retire in 2016. Expenditure for the European schools takes into account the steep increase in the number of pupils in the European schools in Frankfurt and Luxembourg. Taking into account the estimated expenditure for pensions and European schools, the global margin under the ceiling of heading 5 amounts to EUR 574.3 million.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 048 24.02.2016, p. 0001
- Final act published in Official Journal: Corrigendum to final act 32016B0150R(01)
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 053 01.03.2016, p. 0024
- Budgetary joint text approved by Parliament: T8-0407/2015
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Budgetary conciliation report tabled for plenary: A8-0333/2015
- Budgetary joint text: 14195/2015
- Budgetary joint text published: 14195/2015
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0376/2015
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Budgetary report tabled for plenary: A8-0298/2015
- Document attached to the procedure: COM(2015)0513
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE567.773
- Committee opinion: PE564.982
- Committee opinion: PE560.590
- Committee opinion: PE560.844
- Committee opinion: PE564.903
- Committee opinion: PE564.954
- Committee opinion: PE560.918
- Committee opinion: PE560.823
- Committee opinion: PE560.748
- Committee opinion: PE564.966
- Council position on draft budget: 11706/2015
- Committee opinion: PE554.942
- Committee opinion: PE560.881
- Council position on draft budget published: 11706/2015
- Committee opinion: PE560.817
- Committee opinion: PE560.783
- Committee opinion: PE564.956
- Committee opinion: PE557.335
- Document attached to the procedure: COM(2015)0317
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Commission draft budget published: COM(2015)0300
- Commission draft budget published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: COM(2015)0317 EUR-Lex
- Committee opinion: PE557.335
- Committee opinion: PE560.783
- Committee opinion: PE564.956
- Committee opinion: PE560.817
- Committee opinion: PE554.942
- Committee opinion: PE560.881
- Committee opinion: PE560.748
- Committee opinion: PE564.966
- Council position on draft budget: 11706/2015
- Committee opinion: PE560.823
- Committee opinion: PE560.918
- Committee opinion: PE564.903
- Committee opinion: PE564.954
- Committee opinion: PE560.844
- Committee opinion: PE560.590
- Committee opinion: PE564.982
- Committee draft report: PE567.773
- Document attached to the procedure: COM(2015)0513 EUR-Lex
- Budgetary joint text: 14195/2015
- Budgetary joint text approved by Parliament: T8-0407/2015
Activities
- Gérard DEPREZ
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 2016 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0333/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez) FR
- 2016/11/22 2016 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate) FR
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez) (vote) FR
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (debate) FR
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (debate) FR
- Jean ARTHUIS
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 2016 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate) FR
- 2016/11/22 2016 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate) FR
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez) FR
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (debate) FR
- Jonathan ARNOTT
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 2016 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0333/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez)
- 2016/11/22 2016 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate)
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez)
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (debate)
- Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 2016 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0333/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez) HU
- 2016/11/22 2016 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate) HU
- 2016/11/22 2016 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate) HU
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (debate) HU
- Eleftherios SYNADINOS
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 2016 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0333/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez) EL
- 2016/11/22 2016 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate) EL
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez) EL
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (debate) EL
- Miguel VIEGAS
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 2016 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0333/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez) PT
- 2016/11/22 2016 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate) PT
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez) PT
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (debate) PT
- Richard ASHWORTH
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Marie-Christine ARNAUTU
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Gianluca BUONANNO
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Alain CADEC
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 2016 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0333/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez) FR
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez) FR
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (debate) FR
- Bill ETHERIDGE
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Doru-Claudian FRUNZULICĂ
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 2016 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0333/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez)
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez)
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (debate)
- Arne GERICKE
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 2016 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0333/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez) DE
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez) DE
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (debate) DE
- Ivan JAKOVČIĆ
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 2016 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0333/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez) HR
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez) HR
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (debate) HR
- Ivana MALETIĆ
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 2016 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0333/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez) EL
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez) EL
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (debate) EL
- Pavel POC
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Paul RÜBIG
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Igor ŠOLTES
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 2016 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0333/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez) SL
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez) SL
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (debate) SL
- Patricija ŠULIN
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 2016 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0333/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez) SL
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes, Gérard Deprez) SL
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2016 - all sections (debate) SL
- Isabelle THOMAS
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Nedzhmi ALI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Marina ALBIOL GUZMÁN
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
- Hugues BAYET
- José BLANCO LÓPEZ
- Steeve BRIOIS
- Soledad CABEZÓN RUIZ
- Nicola CAPUTO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- David COBURN
- Alberto CIRIO
- Jane COLLINS
- Javier COUSO PERMUY
- Michel DANTIN
- William (The Earl of) DARTMOUTH
- Ian DUNCAN
- Mireille D'ORNANO
- Norbert ERDŐS
- Georgios EPITIDEIOS
- Enrico GASBARRA
- Julie GIRLING
- Tania GONZÁLEZ PEÑAS
- Sergio GUTIÉRREZ PRIETO
- Brian HAYES
- Roger HELMER
- Hans-Olaf HENKEL
- Diane JAMES
- Petr JEŽEK
- Marc JOULAUD
- Philippe JUVIN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Barbara KAPPEL
- Bernd KÖLMEL
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Giovanni LA VIA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Marine LE PEN
- Sander LOONES
- Paloma LÓPEZ BERMEJO
- Vladimír MAŇKA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Andrejs MAMIKINS
- Barbara MATERA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- David MARTIN
- Jean-Luc MÉLENCHON
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
- Marlene MIZZI
- Luigi MORGANO
- Sophie MONTEL
- Franz OBERMAYR
- Margot PARKER
- Florian PHILIPPOT
- Marijana PETIR
- Andrej PLENKOVIĆ
- Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE
- Franck PROUST
- Julia REID
- Claude ROLIN
- Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY
- Martin SCHULZ
- Jill SEYMOUR
- Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ
- Joachim STARBATTY
- Richard SULÍK
- Adam SZEJNFELD
- Tibor SZANYI
- Indrek TARAND
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Marco VALLI
- Ángela VALLINA
- Daniele VIOTTI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Inês Cristina ZUBER
- Lars ADAKTUSSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Inés AYALA SENDER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zoltán BALCZÓ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gerard BATTEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bas BELDER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Reimer BÖGE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- James CARVER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ole CHRISTENSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Salvatore CICU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Therese COMODINI CACHIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pál CSÁKY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Philippe DE BACKER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rachida DATI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Angélique DELAHAYE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marielle DE SARNEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Peter ERIKSSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edouard FERRAND
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Christofer FJELLNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lorenzo FONTANA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ashley FOX
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lidia Joanna GERINGER DE OEDENBERG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Enrique GUERRERO SALOM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Antanas GUOGA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marian HARKIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mike HOOKEM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gunnar HÖKMARK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rikke-Louise KARLSSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Krišjānis KARIŅŠ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Afzal KHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Janusz KORWIN-MIKKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Béla KOVÁCS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alain LAMASSOURE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Constance LE GRIP
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Arne LIETZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bernd LUCKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ernest MARAGALL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dominique MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Louis MICHEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Clare MOODY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Krisztina MORVAI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Renaud MUSELIER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Péter NIEDERMÜLLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Liadh NÍ RIADA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rolandas PAKSAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ioan Mircea PAŞCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miroslav POCHE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Cristian Dan PREDA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Fernando RUAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Matteo SALVINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ricardo SERRÃO SANTOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Peter SIMON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Monika SMOLKOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Davor ŠKRLEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Renato SORU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jaromír ŠTĚTINA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Catherine STIHLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Beatrix von STORCH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudia ȚAPARDEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel TELIČKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ulrike TREBESIUS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mylène TROSZCZYNSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elena VALENCIANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bodil VALERO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Derek VAUGHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Udo VOIGT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Flavio ZANONATO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jana ŽITŇANSKÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 4 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 29 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 31 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 30 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - § 8/1 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 33 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 13 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 39 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - § 19 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 14 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 15 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 16 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 19 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - § 22 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 43 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 45 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 47 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - § 26 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 22 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 49 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 52 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 6 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 24 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 7 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - § 77 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 8 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 26 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 9 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 27 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 10 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Am 11 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - § 115 #
A8-0298/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Résolution de la commission BUDG #
A8-0333/2015 - José Manuel Fernandes et Gérard Deprez - Résolution législative #
Amendments | Dossier |
489 |
2015/2132(BUD)
2015/07/14
IMCO
45 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the responsibility of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection in the budget procedure covers budget lines in titles 2 (Internal market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs), 14 (Taxation and customs union) and 33 (Justice and consumer protection); urges the Commission to ensure a good balance of payments and to promote greening of the EU budget under all titles;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the significant increase in the amount allocated to budget line 14 02 01 on ‘Supporting the functioning and modernisation of the Customs Union’; supports the achievement of the programme’s goals via the furthering of existing modernisation initiatives, particularly the Electronic Customs project, and by developing a strategy for commonly managed and operated IT systems in customs related areas, as well as by improving coordin
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the significant increase in the amount allocated to budget line 14 02 01 on ‘Supporting the functioning and modernisation of the Customs Union’; supports the achievement of the programme’s goals by improving coordination and cooperation between Member States, promoting the exchange of best practices
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the significant increase in the amount allocated to budget line 14 02 01 on ‘Supporting the functioning and modernisation of the Customs Union’; supports the achievement and application of the programme’s goals by improving appropriate coordination and cooperation between Member States, promoting the exchange of best practices and know-how and monitoring the correct application of EU legislation;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Welcomes the increase in budget line 02 04 02 03 ‘Increasing innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)’ and budget line 02 03 ‘Internal market for goods and services’, and suggests that the Commission monitor the effectiveness of the projects financed in order to increase innovation for SMEs;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Is concerned at the drastic reduction in budget lines 02 02 01 (Promoting entrepreneurship and improving the competitiveness and access to markets of Union enterprises) and 02 02 02 (Improving access to finance for small and middle-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the form of equity and debt) as part of the COSME programme; considers this reduction to be inadvisable, bearing in mind that the programme is at an early stage;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Is convinced that consumer policy is a main priority for the European Union and that the budget for this policy area should reflect this, whilst other areas of the budget should see a corresponding reduction in spending;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Is convinced that consumer policy is a main priority for the European Union and that the budget for this policy area should reflect this; notes that it is important to secure funding for updating consumer policy to ensure sound societal adjustment to rapid technological and economic change;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Asks for the financing of a new pilot project entitled ‘Consumer Empowerment and Education in the Digital Single Market (DSM)’, contributing to a large public education campaign to support consumer and business understanding and appreciation of the challenges associated with e-commerce; stresses that this should help citizens and SMEs comply with consumer protection law in the online environment, however, without imposing additional administrative burden on SMEs; emphasises that, in a truly connected DSM, every consumer should be able to trust the safety of products purchased online and receives sufficient information for the purchase in a transparent manner; considers that better compliance with the rules would reduce consumer problems and benefit traders by avoiding problems with the enforcement authorities;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Asks for the financing of a new pilot project entitled ‘Consumer Empowerment and Education in the Digital Single Market (DSM)’, contributing to a large public
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out that Horizon 2020 framework programme funding needs to be shared out more fairly among Member States; draws attention to the fact that several cohesion countries are net contributors to the framework programme; points out that the ‘Innovation Union’ initiative has to involve all countries and regions and that there must be no ‘innovation divide’ between more innovative countries and regions and the rest;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Asks for the financing of a new pilot project entitled ‘Consumer Empowerment and Education in the Digital Single Market (DSM)’, contributing to a large public education campaign to support consumer and business understanding and appreciation of the challenges associated with e-commerce; stresses that this should help citizens and SMEs comply with consumer protection law in the online environment; emphasises that, in a truly connected DSM, every consumer should be able to trust the safety of products purchased online; considers that better compliance with the rules would reduce consumer problems and benefit traders by avoiding problems with the enforcement
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Asks for the financing, from reductions in other areas of the budget, of a new pilot project entitled ‘Consumer Empowerment and Education in the Digital Single Market (DSM)’, contributing to a large public education campaign to support consumer and business understanding and appreciation of the challenges associated with e-commerce; stresses that this should help citizens and SMEs comply with consumer protection law in the online environment; emphasises that, in a truly connected DSM, every consumer should be able to trust the safety of products purchased online; considers that better compliance with the rules would reduce consumer problems and benefit traders by avoiding problems with the enforcement authorities;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Asks for the financing of a new pilot
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Asks for the financing of a new pilot project entitled ‘Consumer Empowerment and Education in the Digital Single Market (DSM)’, contributing to a large public education campaign to
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Asks for the financing of a new pilot project entitled ‘Consumer Empowerment and Education in the Digital
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Asks for the financing of a new pilot
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Asks for the financing of a new pilot project entitled ‘Consumer Empowerment and Education on the safety of products and market surveillance in the Digital Single Market (DSM)’, contributing to a large public education campaign to support consumer and business understanding and appreciation of the challenges associated with e-commerce; stresses that this should help citizens and SMEs comply with consumer protection law in the online environment; emphasises that, in a truly connected DSM, every consumer should be able to trust the safety of products purchased online; finds it important that relevant authorities have the ability to stop the products and make the companies recall or withdraw the products from the European market; considers that better
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Recalls the need to finance the multilingual tool for the
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Recalls the need to finance the multilingual tool for the online dispute resolution (ODR) platform; emphasises that well-functioning ODR systems across the EU will encourage consumers to seek solutions to the problems they encounter when buying products and services in the SM and will boost online purchases; recalls that more online and cross-border trade in the EU will also broaden consumer choice and provide businesses with new opportunities and help drive economic growth;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Emphasises that SOLVIT has
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Emphasises that SOLVIT has proved its effectiveness in resolving problems affecting citizens; reiterates its support for budget line 02 03 04 on internal market governance tools; believes that the European Consumer Centres Network should also be given appropriate funding allowing it to continue its mission of educating citizens on their consumer rights in Europe;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Believes that supporting the real economy should be a key priority for the EU for job creation and sustainable growth; urges that the uptake of this financial support by SMEs be maximised; urges for making sufficient financing available for a transition to a resource- efficient, circular economy;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Believes that supporting the real economy should be a key priority for the EU; urges that SME be better informed of this option so that the uptake of this financial support especially by SMEs be maximised;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Believes that supporting the real economy should be
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Points out the need to secure adequate financing for the COSME programme and for the Enterprise Europe Network in 2016 in order to
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Points out the need to secure adequate financing for the COSME programme and for the Enterprise Europe Network in 2016 in order to specifically take into account the difficulties encountered by SMEs owing to the EU’s economic and financial constraints; calls, therefore, for an increase in the budget line 02 02 02 for improving access to finance for SMEs to enable European SMEs to prosper and innovate and to make the most of the Single Market and the EU’s trade relations;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the Single Market (SM) is a key driver of growth and jobs; notes, however, that this potential remains untapped in many respects, such as the Digital Single Market; asks, therefore, for better spending of the budget by providing adequate financial means for the SM in order to cover a clear set of priorities related to the real economy; stresses that the competitiveness of the Single Market and European businesses could be strengthened through a stronger focus on delivering a European Internet;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Points out the need to secure adequate financing for the COSME programme and for the Enterprise Europe Network in 2016 in order to specifically take into account the difficulties encountered by SMEs owing to the EU’s economic and financial constraints; believes that Union must further support SMEs in better accessing information about single market opportunities outside their own Member State as well as beyond the Union’s borders;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Highlights that standards are important tools for the competitiveness of undertakings, whose participation in the standardisation process is essential for technological progress as well as for the comparability of material and product quality in the Union; therefore, agrees that payments under budget line 02 03 02 01 aimed at
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Highlights that standards are important tools for the competitiveness of undertakings, whose participation in the standardisation process is essential for technological progress in the Union; therefore, agrees that payments under budget line 02 03 02 01 aimed at supporting standardisation activities performed by CEN, CENELEC and ETSI
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Notes with concern that the budgetary constraints being imposed on Member States are leading to greater restrictions on STI investment, with highly damaging effects.
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. In light of the adoption of the E-call regulation, calls for proper funding to be given to European GNSS Agency in order to fully implement the regulation.
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Points to the crucial role of structural and investment funds in promoting STI investment; believes that the European Social Fund and the European Regional Development Fund have a central role to play in, respectively, training and skills development for workers in the area of innovation and the funding of regional innovation strategies that could bring benefits in terms of territorial policy, improving living conditions, promoting social justice and well-being, and preserving the environment; points to the importance of strengthening cohesion policy and the related objectives by making use of innovation and other means and, to that end, revising the 2014-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the Single Market (SM) is a key driver of growth and jobs; notes, however, that this potential remains untapped in many respects; asks, therefore, for better spending of the budget by
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the Single Market (SM) is a key driver
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the Single Market (SM) is a key driver of growth and jobs; notes, however, that this potential remains untapped in many respects; asks, therefore, for better spending of the budget by providing adequate financial means for the SM in order to cover a clear set of priorities related to the real economy, whilst finding equivalent savings in other sections of the budget;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the Single Market (SM) is a key driver of growth and jobs and is also supposed to support SME; notes,
source: 564.973
2015/07/20
INTA
43 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that adequate appropriations should be allocated to
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is at the same time fully aware that the policies and financing instruments in the remit of this committee are small compared to other policy and financing instruments under Headings 2 and 3 and do not receive as much attention as other programmes and funds; strongly rejects therefore any further reduction of funding of programmes and budget lines as the impact would not be tolerable; urges Member States especially to view the implementation of environmental and climate-friendly policies, actions and projects as a chance to foster growth and
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is concerned that many Union citizens
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Recalls in particular the very substantial added value of the Union in medical research (e.g. research for paediatric and orphan medicines) and also in fighting cross-border health threats, such as Ebola; urges to ensure that the financing of the new EU research projects on Ebola vaccine and diagnostics does not suffer from Horizon 2020 budget cuts;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Highlights that the Union has the highest standards for food safety in the world; stresses the importance of promotion of healthy and safe food as a means to prevent unnecessary spending in healthcare and help Member States to improve the long term sustainability of their health systems; therefore, also regrets that the food and feed programme, with a total amount in commitments of only EUR 264,1 million, which represents a share of only 0,17% in commitments in the DB 2016 and proposed further cuts by the Council, does not fully reflect the importance of the issue of food and feed safety in the Union;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on the Commission to safeguard the high food safety standards in course of bilateral trade agreements;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is concerned that many Union citizens equate globalisation with a loss of European output and jobs; points to the increasing role of NGOs in shaping public opinion on trade-related matters due to the lack of an effective Union communication strategy explaining the Union’s trade policy; emphasises the need for an increase in the Commission’s information and communication budget to allow for better engagement with citizens; calls on the Commission to present a study on the funding sources and the impact of NGOs active in trade issues to increase transparency regarding the role of NGOs and to identify possible adjustment needs of NGOs funding from the EU budget;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 15. Recalls that the Union Civil Protection Mechanism is a cornerstone of Union solidarity; recalls that the primary responsibility for the protection of people, as well as the environment and property, including cultural heritage, lies with Member States; underlines that the Union plays an "enabling role" to support, coordinate or supplement the actions of Member States in the prevention of, preparedness for, and response to disasters; welcomes the slight increase in the commitments for this programme proposed by the Commission, but deeply regrets the Council's proposal to reduce the budget of that line;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Calls on the Member States to ensure proper environmental inspections to reduce the risk of environmental disasters;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 22 22.
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Emphasises that the result of the economic and financial crisis and the stringent austerity policies implemented by the Member States has been budget cuts and a fall in tax receipts, that these in turn have led to reductions in funding for public health systems, and that health inequality in the EU is placing a serious burden on Member States and their health systems, and calls, therefore, for increased funding for coordinated public preventive measures in this area;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 22 b (new) 22b. Emphasises that environmentally sustainable agriculture which makes prudent use of natural resources is essential to food production, and calls for more support to be given to farmers who employ environmentally sound and animal-friendly methods;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the slight increase in commitments for the Instrument for Macro-Financial Assistance and the European Neighbourhood Instrument;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises that the implementation of the Trade Facilitation Agreement reached at the 9th Ministerial Conference of the WTO will require funding support for the least developed and developing countries;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses th
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises that the implementation of the Trade Facilitation Agreement reached at the 9th Ministerial Conference of the WTO will require funding support for the least developed and developing countries; deplores, therefore, the reduced appropriations for Aid for Trade and multilateral initiatives;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises that the implementation of the Trade Facilitation Agreement reached at the 9th Ministerial Conference of the WTO will require funding support for the least developed and developing countries;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises that the implementation of the Trade Facilitation Agreement reached at the 9th Ministerial Conference of the WTO will require increased funding support for the least developed and developing countries;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Recalls that Parliament introduced an additional credit of EUR 1 million in 2009 specifically for actions related to Fair Trade in the budgetary line aimed at financing projects in the area of external trade, and calls on the Commission to consider re-introducing this budget line in 2016 to finance actions related to Fair Trade, as defined by the Commission Communication of 5 May 20091 a ; __________________ 1a COM (2009)0215.
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Notes the moderate increase in appropriations for the Partnership Instrument; recalls the programme objective to foster international trade and investment opportunities of European SMEs; stresses the importance of economic and technical support for SMEs to help them become more international; calls on the Commission to assess and improve the existing tools regarding their efficiency and effectiveness and to ensure sufficient controls and oversight of all activities
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Notes the moderate increase in appropriations for the Partnership Instrument; recalls the programme objective to foster international trade and investment opportunities of European SMEs; calls on the Commission to assess and improve the existing tools regarding their efficiency and effectiveness and to ensure sufficient controls and oversight of all activities with the aim to develop a more coherent approach, also taking account of existing private initiatives.
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses the importance of increasing funding for customs policies in order to deal with the large volume of customs declarations and address the need to promote computerisation, facilitate legitimate trade and meet the expectations of stakeholders regarding the protection of their interests; points out, in this regard, that the absence of effective, harmonised customs systems is resulting in a severe disruption of European trade, which is weakening European competitiveness and undermining the safety of citizens.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that adequate appropriations should be allocated to the trade-related budget lines to enable the Commission to efficiently and effectively pursue its ambitious trade agenda aimed at creating growth and jobs across Europe and attaining the Union’s wider international goals as well as to step up its efforts regarding the monitoring of the implementation and the effects of trade agreements;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Deeply regrets that the Council has proposed budget cuts which appear to be of horizontal nature to some important programmes, in particular on the Third programme for the Union's action in the field of health (2014-2020), on lines pertaining to food and feed safety, and on disaster prevention and preparedness within the Union; in the context of the accession of the Union to international conventions (e.g. the Nagoya Protocol); refuses the reduction of the corresponding budgetary lines proposed by the Council;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that adequate appropriations should be allocated to the trade-related budget lines to enable the Commission to pursue its ambitious trade agenda aimed at creating growth and jobs across Europe and attaining the Union’s wider international goals as well as to step up its efforts regarding the monitoring of the implementation and the effects of trade agreements, ensuring that adequate funding is available for both ex ante and ex post impact assessments for the trade agreements currently being negotiated or those already ratified;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Recalls that, in general, the level of resources allocated to budgetary lines that are in the remit of this committee has to be maintained at the level of the year 2015; calls therefore for the initial amounts indicated in the draft budget to be fully restored for all programmes and financing instruments in the remit of this committee;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that adequate appropriations should be allocated to the
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that Horizon 2020 will contribute to objectives in the remit of this committee with research projects in the areas of climate, health and environment; affirms its commitment to monitor the alignment of the projects with the corresponding objectives and the progress of their implementation; criticises sharply the decision to cut funding for this programme in order to finance the EFSI guarantee;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses the need for additional efforts to boost the active monitoring of the application and repercussions of trade agreements signed by the Union, guaranteeing that trade-related budget lines earmark sufficient resources for ex- ante, ex-post and interim assessment of trade agreements in relation to the EU economy and the economy of its partner countries;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines, in that connection, that environmental research and innovation finds its centre of gravity in Horizon 2020's: "Climate action, environment, resource efficiency and raw materials",
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that the Union must step up its efforts regarding the monitoring of the implementation and the effects of trade agreements, ensuring that those obligations entered into by trading partners are fully implemented and enforced;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Notes that the EU Draft Budget for 2016 amounts to EUR 153,5 billion in commitment appropriations (including EUR 4,5 billion reprogrammed from 2014) and EUR 143,5 billion in payment appropriations; points out that
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Stresses the need to allocate specific resources for the comprehensive ex-ante and ex-post assessment of the possible gender-equality impact of trade agreements signed by the Union;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is concerned that many Union citizens
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Points out the paramount importance of investments in research and innovation in several areas which are under the remit of this committee and stresses that the budget 2016 must appropriately reflect that such investments are a priority; points out that the sustainable growth and innovation capacity of Union SMEs is one of the main competitive advantages that the EU has in globalised markets;
source: 565.029
2015/07/24
AFET
24 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the defence of human rights
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the defence of human rights and the promotion of democracy is a matter of vital importance in the current global environment and symbolic of the EU's commitments to its core values; emphasises that the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights is an essential tool in this regard, which needs to be provided with adequate funding; asks for a rise in commitments for the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace to support refugees, such as Syrian refugees in Lebanon and the Kingdom of Jordan;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the defence of human rights, fundamental freedoms and the promotion of democracy is a matter of vital importance in the current global environment and symbolic of the EU's commitments to its core values; emphasises that the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights is an essential tool in this regard, which needs to be provided with adequate funding;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Takes note of the conclusions of the European Council of 25 June 2015; stresses that the CFSP entails strong commitments to visibility and flexibility, notably to the development of civilian and military capacities, to reinforcing the defence industry and to SMEs; to that end, strongly welcomes the Council's readiness to ensure appropriate funding for the preparatory action on CSDP related research, paving the way for a dedicated and well-funded defence research and technology program in the next MFF;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the EEAS to prepare for the opening of an EU delegation in Iran with the aim of effectively representing the EU, particularly after the deal has been reached between the E3+3 and Iran, and the need to address important topics such as human rights and regional stability;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the importance of budgeting sufficient funds for the Middle East Peace Process, the Palestinian Authority and UNRWA in order to meet the needs on the ground, which have increased in recent years due to multiple regional crises; demands the creation of a specific budget line in the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace for the protection of and provision of humanitarian aid to persecuted minorities, such as Christians in the Middle East;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the importance of budgeting sufficient funds for the Middle East Peace Process, the Palestinian Authority and UNRWA for specific, well-defined projects in order to meet the needs on the ground
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the importance of budgeting sufficient funds for the Middle East Peace Process, the Palestinian Authority and UNRWA in order to meet the needs on the ground, which have increased in recent years due to multiple regional crises; emphasises the need to address the regular under-planning of EU financial support to UNRWA in the EU budget;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the importance of budgeting
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Deplores the Council's proposed reduction of commitments appropriations for cooperation with Middle Eastern countries under the Development Cooperation Instrument; recalls the crisis in Yemen and other challenges related to it;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. A
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Asks for further clarification on the need for the budget line for EU Special Representatives to be transferred from the CFSP budget to the EEAS budget to ensure their adequate integration into the work of the EEAS in order to determine whether such a transfer would respect the subsidiarity principle and if it would take place in a budgetary neutral manner.
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses the need to foresee funding for the EEAS to start providing consular functions in its delegations in order to provide help for all EU citizens during crises, as not all Member States can afford having embassies and representations in all of the countries where the EEAS is present; underlines that it is therefore necessary for EU delegations to start providing consular assistance to all EU citizens in need.
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Supports the EEAS' plan to open an EU delegation in Iran in the wake of the successful conclusion of the nuclear talks.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises the particular importance of providing sufficient funding for the European Neighbourhood Instrument, which
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises the particular importance of providing sufficient funding for the European Neighbourhood Instrument,
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises the particular importance of providing sufficient funding for the European Neighbourhood Instrument, which plays a vital role in supporting stability among Europe's Eastern and Southern neighbours; strongly welcomes the 4.9% increase in commitment appropriations compared to last year; notes critically the severe cuts applied to the ENI by Council and stresses the urgent need to increase appropriations by a substantial margin to meet the needs of the countries covered by the instrument; calls for the scaling-up of concrete funding for EU- Arctic related initiatives in the framework of driving forward the EU-Arctic strategy making and in the light of increased geopolitical interest in the Arctic region;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises the particular importance of providing sufficient funding for the European Neighbourhood Instrument, which plays a vital role in supporting stability among Europe's Eastern and Southern neighbours; strongly welcomes the 4.9% increase in commitment appropriations compared to last year; notes critically the severe cuts applied to the ENI by Council and stresses the urgent need to increase appropriations by a substantial margin to meet the needs of the countries covered by the instrument; invites the Commission and the EEAS to evaluate ENI policy implementation and effectiveness;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Welcomes the rise in commitment and payment appropriations for the CFSP, given the current geopolitical situation, notably in Europe's neighbourhood; asks whether commitments and payments will increase in the 2016 draft budget to fight terrorism, tackle challenges in the Mediterranean, and deal with the crisis in Libya and Yemen;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Welcomes the rise in commitments for the EU's military missions such as EUTM Mali and EUNAVFOR Med, and its civilian missions, such as EUBAM Libya;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Recalls that fighting terrorism is an EU priority for the coming years and calls for an increase in commitment appropriations on all budget lines related to the fight, notably the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace;
source: 564.957
2015/07/27
AGRI
48 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Regrets the fact that, given the ceiling imposed by the 2014-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for Heading 2, major categories of common agricultural policy (CAP) spending are likely, in practice, to be cut in 2016, including direct payments and market measures, despite overall commitments and payments being up by 2.4% and 1.6% respectively;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Insists on the need to provide funds to compensate for the economic losses suffered by farmers due to market crises and sanitary or phytosanitary crises such as Xylella fastidiosa, and reiterates the need to use the available margins under Heading 2 to this effect; calls for an increase in the resources necessary to intervene in the dairy market, preventing a foreseeable collapse in prices resulting from the abolition of the milk quota regime;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Insists on the need to provide funds to compensate for the economic losses suffered by farmers due to market crises and sanitary or phytosanitary crises such as Xylella fastidiosa, and reiterates the need to use the available margins under Heading 2 to this effect; insists that compensation for eradication should also cover rehabilitation of agro-ecosystems including the soil, as well as establishing robust biological diversity, especially ensuring genetic diversity of the planting stock that ideally includes resistance to or tolerance of the disease or pest; Indeed, considers that one of the aims of any aid granted should be to ensure balanced, biologically diverse agro-ecosystems and landscapes that are less susceptible to future attacks;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Insists on the need to provide funds to compensate for the economic losses suffered by farmers due to market crises and sanitary or phytosanitary crises such as Xylella fastidiosa, and reiterates the need to use the available margins under Heading 2 to this effect; calls on the Commission and the Council to take all the necessary measures to combat the deterioration of those markets;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 (new) calls for additional funding to be earmarked for the olive-growing and olive oil sector to offset losses to farmers caused by the Xylella fastidiosa outbreak, to step up prevention measures in Europe, to combat the spread of this devastating disease and to restructure the sector and consolidate scientific research into the pathogen and its carrier;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Generally notes that investment is needed to make our agro-ecosystems resilient to climate change and to the establishment and spread of invasive species, notably through biologically diverse farmed landscapes and living, healthy soils that contain predators and beneficial species, allowing for natural regulation of pest populations;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Regrets the proposed cuts of EUR 2 million for the school milk programme from EUR 77 million in the 2015 appropriation to EUR 75 million in the DB for 2016; recalls Parliament’s request for an increase of EUR 20 million a year for this scheme; welcomes the small increase in the school fruit scheme to EUR 150 million; stresses that both programmes have proven to be useful and efficient within the Member States, in particular because they teach children healthy eating habits, and underlines their importance given the current crisis
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Regrets the proposed cuts of EUR 2 million for the school milk programme from EUR 77 million in the 2015 appropriation to EUR 75 million in the DB for 2016; recalls Parliament’s request for an increase of EUR 20 million a year for this scheme;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Regrets the
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Regrets the proposed cuts of EUR 2 million for the school milk programme from EUR 77 million in the 2015 appropriation to EUR 75 million in the DB for 2016; recalls Parliament’s request for an increase of EUR 20 million a year, which would provide an annual budget for th
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes that this reduction in the budget reflects a new CAP that is geared to the market and based on full market liberalisation, with serious consequences for European agriculture;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Regrets the Council's proposed cut of €13.8 million to operational funds for producer organisations in the fruit and vegetable sector given their importance in the food supply chain and the current challenges facing the sector;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls for the school milk and school fruit programmes to be moved to the second pillar of the Common Agricultural Policy so that their specific design can be better tailored on the ground to regional specificities and needs and the acceptance and user-friendliness of the programmes thereby increased;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Insists that any revenue accruing to the
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Insists that any revenue accruing to the EU budget deriving from the super levy or any other assigned revenues from agriculture in 2014/2015 must remain under Heading 2;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Insists that any revenue accruing to the EU budget deriving from
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Insists that any revenue accruing to the EU budget deriving from
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that any funds allocated to the reserve for crises in the agricultural sector in the 2016 budget
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that funds allocated to the reserve for crises in the agricultural sector in the 2016 budget, which are subsequently left unspent, remain in full under Heading 2 for the following budget year for direct payments to farmers, as provided for in Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013; reiterates that the funds used to offset the impact of the Russian embargo must not be taken from the reserve funds for crises in the agricultural sector;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Regrets the Council’s decision to reject the call for a six-month extension of NRDP funding, at the request of 11 Member States, for the financial year 2007-2013;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Notes that European agriculture has increasingly been exposed to crises in recent years; calls therefore on the Commission to reconsider the system of contingency funding and to create a new instrument that allows rapid political intervention in the event of a crisis, without burdening the annual direct payments;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Regrets the cuts made to the budget for intervention in the agricultural markets compared with 2015; disagrees with the Commission that emergency measures related to the Russian embargo on imports from the EU of certain agricultural products be limited to 2015 only, given Russia’s expressed intention to extend the ban on imports until early 2016; is concerned that further market interventions will be necessary in 2016 as a consequence, to support EU farmers hit by the embargo, in particular in the countries adjoining Russia;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to monitor, in a timely way, the significant price volatility of agricultural products, with a particular focus on the dairy sector, which has adverse effects on farmers’ incomes, and to react promptly and effectively when needed;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to monitor, in a timely way, the significant price volatility of agricultural products, which has adverse effects on farmers’ incomes, and to react promptly and effectively when needed, giving farmers directly the option of combating such price volatility;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to monitor, in a timely way, the significant price volatility of agricultural products, which has adverse effects on farmers’ incomes, and to react promptly and effectively when needed; notes that this monitoring should be carried out in all production sectors, paying particular attention to small and medium-sized farms;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to monitor, in a timely way, the
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Notes the effects of elimination of the milk quotas and takes the view that preparatory measures are necessary to avoid market imbalances following the abolition of sugar quotas in September 2017;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Calls on the Commission to mobilise the agricultural sector crisis reserve in order to implement crisis measures to aid the dairy industry; considers that the aim of such measures should be to help small and medium-sized milk producers, who have been hit hardest since the quota system was abolished in 2015, and that expenditure should be earmarked for technological improvement of production processes and incentives to produce added value products;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Welcomes the level of funds allocated to support beekeeping, as Parliament has
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Highlights the objectives of increasing the competitiveness and sustainability of European agriculture, and asks for resources to be provided in order to fulfil these objectives
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Highlights the objective
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Stresses the need to create a budget line to support and recognise the important role played by farmers’ trade union organisations in Europe;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Regrets the cuts made to the budget for intervention in the agricultural markets compared with 2015; disagrees with the Commission that emergency measures related to the Russian embargo on imports from the EU of certain agricultural products be limited to 2015 only, given Russia's expressed intention to extend the ban on imports until early 2016; is
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Believes voluntary modulation between pillar I and pillar II of the agricultural budget could lead to competition distortion effects by uneven distribution of (in)direct subsidies by Members States. Urges the Commission to report on the possible side-effects of these measures in light of mid-term review of the CAP
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Regrets the introduction of flexibility between Pilar 1 and Pilar 2 and thereby a renationalisation of the European Agricultural Policy;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls for the full alignment in sum of direct payments and rural development payments in the EU-28 as soon as possible; notes that the large difference of direct payments in different member states hinders competitiveness, therefore calls the Commission to consider the EU-28 as a whole on the global agricultural market;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Underscores the importance of developing new markets for maintaining competitiveness and increasing the resistance of European agriculture to market crises such as in the case of Russia embargo; calls for the financial support of market development, inter alia through the use of funds from the superlevy;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Stresses that it is essential that funds earmarked for research in the agri-food sector, in particular from the Horizon 2020 budget, remain fully available as such in order to stimulate innovation in the agricultural sector;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on the Commission to increase the funding allocated in the 2016 and 2017 EU budgets to the agricultural sector crisis reserve by EUR 162 000 000 a year, which should be used to implement aid measures for the sugar sector and sugar beet producers, taking into account that production quotas are to be abolished in 2017;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Recalls the difficulties encountered in previous financial years when appropriations were cut; believes that any attempt to reduce agricultural appropriations would be ineffective and even dangerous, since this would undermine CAP objectives, leaving the sector even more vulnerable, and significantly weaken efforts to improve the competitiveness of European agriculture;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Takes the view that specific budget lines should be provided to support small- scale processing projects for agricultural products, geared to short marketing channels;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 c (new) 14c. Takes the view that a budget line should be provided to promote distribution networks based on short marketing channels.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Regrets the cuts made to the budget for intervention in the agricultural markets compared with 2015; disagrees with the Commission that emergency measures related to the Russian embargo on imports from the EU of certain agricultural products be limited to 2015 only and takes the view that emergency measures must be extended to countries indirectly affected by the Russian embargo, given Russia’s expressed intention to extend the ban on imports until early 2016; is concerned that further market interventions will be necessary in 2016 as a consequence, to support EU farmers hit by the embargo;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Regrets the cuts made to the budget for intervention in the agricultural markets compared with 2015;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Regrets the cuts made to the budget for intervention in the agricultural markets compared with 2015;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Is surprised at the significant cut to aid for producer organisations from EUR 541.5 million to EUR 387 million, which is at odds with the whole approach underlying the new CAP, based on strengthening those same producer organisations;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Believes it necessary to establish a dedicated budget line to support milk producers suffering from the long-term effects on the market of the Russian embargo;
source: 565.016
2015/07/28
PECH
14 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Points out how important it is that the EU budget
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 20 Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 22 22. Notes the appropriations earmarked for the EFCA; regrets the loss of one post on the establishment plan;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 25 25. Urges the Member States concerned to do their utmost to ensure that all operational programmes as referred to in Articles 17, 18 and 19 of the EMFF Regulation are validated by 31 December 2015 at the latest; takes the view that the amounts entered in the draft budget against Articles 11 06 60, 11 06 61, 11 06 62 and 11 06 63 are in line with needs, with the exception, however, of heading 11 06 62 01 on scientific advice and knowledge, the drastic reduction of payments for which, particularly in comparison with 2015, seems unjustified, and that the amounts should therefore be reinstated at the 2015 levels;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Proposes that headings 11 06 60 01, 11 06 60 02, 11 06 60 03, 11 06 60 04, 11 06 60 05 and 11 06 60 06 be created in order to render transparent and amenable to monitoring the allocation of expenditure adopted in Article 13 of Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 on the EMFF;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 27 27. Supports all current pilot projects and preparatory actions related to fisheries, which should be adequately funded so that they can be completed; notes the requests for payment appropriations for the projects and actions under Items 11 06 77 03, 11 06 77 06, 11 06 77 07, 11 06 77 08 and 11 06 77 09; calls on the Council to take into consideration the new pilot projects backed by Parliament.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Is concerned at the situation in the fisheries sector, which must maintain its competitiveness while complying with the demands of the common fisheries policy (CFP) and the requirements of sound fishery resource management under arrangements to manage stocks above the biomass levels at which the maximum sustainable yield can be achieved; is concerned at the industry's and national authorities' difficulties in meeting the landing obligation; stresses that the efforts sought from fishermen have already enabled many stocks to attain the maximum sustainable yield;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Is concerned at the situation in the fisheries sector, which must maintain its competitiveness while complying with the demands of the common fisheries policy (CFP) and the requirements of sound fishery resource management under arrangements to manage stocks above the biomass levels at which the maximum sustainable yield can be achieved;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Is concerned at the situation in the fisheries sector, which must maintain its competitiveness while complying with the demands of the common fisheries policy (CFP) and the requirements of sound fishery resource management under arrangements to manage stocks above the biomass levels at which the maximum
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (new) Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Deplores the fact that, in Title 11 of Section III, the Council has reduced commitment appropriations by EUR 750 388 and payment appropriations by EUR 4 646 986;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Expresses its concern about the Council’s reading of the budget for 2016, which fails to take into account the political commitments in the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and reduces certain appropriations which are vital to the implementation of the CFP; calls, accordingly, for the appropriations for Title 11 of Section III of the Commission’s Draft Budget to be reinstated;
Amendment 8 #
7a. Points out that the EMFF must be sufficiently primed to help the small-scale fishing industry renew its fishing gear in order to meet the severe constraints connected with the landing obligation; considers that, since that obligation arises from a regulation, all the expenses incurred by fishermen in this regard should be covered by the EMFF;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 19 source: 565.020
2015/08/03
REGI
24 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes with concern the decrease of payment appropriations under heading 1b to EUR 49 billion (-4% as compared to 2015)
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Recalls that the conclusions of the sixth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion highlighted the fact that regional disparities had increased since 2008; emphasises the crucial role played by the EU budget in triggering investment, given that, by supplementing public and private financing at national and international level, its leverage effect helps reinforce growth and ensure economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Notes that the EU draft budget for 2016 foresees commitments amounting to EUR 153 500 billion (a 5.3% reduction as compared with 2015) and payment appropriations of EUR 143.5 billion (a 1.6% increase over 2015);
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes furthermore that it is desirable also to take into account in advance the impact on payments under heading 1b due to the modification of the Multiannual Financial Framework 2014- 2020;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recalls the need for sufficient resources to ensure, on the
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recalls the need for sufficient resources to ensure the intended impact of the programmes, on the one hand, and of their multiannual operation, on the other, which together call for appropriate and definitive measures in order to minimise the risk of recurrence of the backlog of payments in later stages of the cohesion policy implementation; is concerned, however, at the continuous increase in administrative expenditures, in spite of earlier assurances that these would be limited;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recalls the need for sufficient resources to ensure the intended impact of the programmes, on the one hand, and of their multiannual operation, on the other, which together call for appropriate and definitive measures in order to minimise the risk of recurrence of the backlog of payments in
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to review the 2016 draft budget in order to ensure sufficient funds for payment appropriations under heading 1b;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Recalls that the outermost region of Mayotte is the only region in the EU to have been granted a one-off allocation, contrary to the general regulations governing the funds; therefore calls on the Commission to perform a mid-term re- evaluation of the allocation to be granted to Mayotte in accordance with the calculation rules for all regions in the EU;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to thoroughly monitor, in close cooperation with the Member States and regions, and to prepare a detailed forecast on the evolution of payments under heading 1b related to the 2014-2020 programming period, using measurable and thus comparable key performance indicators which will account for the efficiency and effectiveness of the budget appropriations;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes with concern the decrease of payment appropriations under heading 1b to EUR 49 billion (-4% as compared to 2015)
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Asks the Commission in future to reduce the commitment appropriations for cohesion policy and to review, for the next programming period, the breakdown of cohesion policy funding by Member State so that the EU’s funding capability can be better anticipated;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recalls that outstanding payments undermine the credibility and accountability of the Union, in particular in those parts of the society and territory where they are most needed; Considers the payment backlog a structural problem likely to re-occur due to the low payment ceilings; Requests therefore a long-term solution going beyond the short-term alleviations of the payment plan;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Is concerned that, in certain cases, the Member States will disburse funding quickly to avoid losing funds which have been committed, a procedure which would increase the risk of irregularities and might lead to financial corrections, and that a situation would arise whereby funds which had not been absorbed at the end of the programming period were subject to automatic decommitment;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Takes note of the Commission's proposal for a preparatory action under heading 1b, which is open to all Member States, and is intended to finance capacity development and institution building to support the implementation of reforms identified as priorities in the lifecycle of the macroeconomic surveillance, and calls for
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes with great concern the decrease of payment appropriations under heading 1b to EUR 49 billion (-4% as compared to 2015), and
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes with concern the decrease of
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes with concern that this reduction might exacerbate the backlog of payments situation; points out that the situation is especially worrying, since it threatens proper implementation of the operational programmes and exposes project initiators and management authorities to a considerable financial risk for partner firms of projects financed by EU funds;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Strongly disagrees with the institutionalisation of the link between cohesion policy and the Stability and Growth Pact, the logic and objectives of which are diametrically opposed; emphasises that the purpose of cohesion policy should not be to impose stringent performance measures and macroeconomic and financial conditions necessitating austerity measures or to penalise Member States and regions; stresses that, on the contrary, cohesion policy aims to ensure balanced growth and eliminate inequalities in order to achieve real economic, social and territorial cohesion; points out that financing for European regions must not be suspended in the event of failure by the Member States to comply with macroeconomic conditions and that the suspension of financing for Member States experiencing difficulties would exacerbate their situation;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Is seriously concerned that payment delays - to a large extend - hit small and vulnerable beneficiaries especially when they are not reimbursed by the Member States before the certifying authorities have received the payment from the Commission and therefore have to bear the negative impact of payment delays despite a lack of financial capacity to pre- finance expenditure for a long time;
source: 565.057
2015/08/06
ECON
107 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes how the pace of economic recovery and long-term growth prospects in the EU are being affected by the slowdown in investment, reflecting in part budgetary constraints in the Member States;
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that, in order to optimise the European budget, the funding planned for the transport sector
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the importance of TEN-T not only as nodal points of connection within Europe, but also as a chance to launch the individual domestic markets; underlines therefore that the CEF should be valued as a system of funding not only for
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the importance of TEN-T not only as nodal points of connection within Europe, but also as a chance to launch the individual domestic markets, in particular the markets of the Central and Eastern European Member States, whose transport infrastructure is much poorer than that of the other Member States; underlines therefore that the CEF should be valued as a system of funding not only for infrastructures but for European policies as a whole.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Highlights the crucial role to be played by the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) in
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Highlights the crucial role to be played by the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) in closing gaps not
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission to take into account, with a view to the allocation of funds from the CEF, the economic and social difficulties some EU countries are currently undergoing which risk considerably hampering the submission of projects; calls, therefore, on the Commission to supply the necessary assistance to these countries in the framework of the CEF programme.
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Highlights the crucial role to be played by the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) in closing gaps not covered by the market and
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recommends putting greater attention to
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recommends putting greater attention to transport policies related to ports and airports, as they promote the competitiveness of our territories through the opening of Europe to the rest
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for the 2016 draft budget to reflect
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recommends putting greater attention to transport policies related to ports and airports, as they promote competitiveness through the opening of Europe to the rest of the world; underlines the need for a rational
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for the 2016 draft budget to reflect Parliament’s position including with regard to a more comprehensive analysis of individual Member States’ economic prospects
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Maintains that when funding is to be provided under the EU budget, the following principles have to be observed: – monitoring to ensure proper use of funds from the moment when they are first allocated until the works have been completed, with ex ante and ex post checks; guaranteeing transparency and legality so as to prevent criminal infiltration, and using funding in accordance with European regulations; – environmental impact assessment by means of independent studies, the object being to reduce the impact on the environment and the landscape to a minimum; – involving local people, for example through referendums, in order to assess how the areas concerned are being affected by the works financed.
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for the 2016 draft budget to reflect Parliament’s position including with regard to a more comprehensive analysis of individual Member States’ economic prospects and responsibilities within the framework of the European Semester;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Points out that Parliament has less than the other institutions in the way of a guarantee of access to official documents concerning the EU budget; calls, therefore, for the interinstitutional agreements to be revised with a view to providing the Members of Parliament, who represent European citizens, with proper access to documents, even when these contain ‘sensitive’ information.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes how the pace of economic recovery and long-term growth prospects in the EU are being affected by the slowdown in investment, reflecting in
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that the funding planned for the transport sector is justifiably linked to other policies such as cohesion, competition, tourism and security, and that transport infrastructures are at the service of the overall development of the European Union; recommends using forward-looking economic measures as a contribution to a real structural evolution of the European economy; points out that all Member States recognised, during the discussion on the
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for the 2016
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Draws attention to the forthcoming adoption of the fourth railway package which provides for
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Believes the Draft General Budget 2016 is a first step towards achieving real focus, budget discipline and a concrete example of how the Commission is fulfilling its commitment to be ‘big on big things and small on small things’;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Draws attention to the
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Calls for the Commission to continue to prioritise programmes that contribute to real growth, competitiveness and job creation and to identify areas within the EU budget where savings and efficiencies can be made in order to reinforce these priorities;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Draws attention to the forthcoming adoption of the fourth railway package which provides for greater coordination between national safety agencies and the European Railway Agency in order to make procedures, timing and resources more efficient;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls for the inclusion of a spending line in the 2016 budget that could be used to back up capital and interest payments of a pilot EU bond issuance;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recommends that in its financial planning, the Commission give priority to funding for forms of sustainable mobility with a view to reducing pollutant emissions in keeping with the Europe 2020 targets and the transport White Paper.
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Emphasises that the EMSA must be equipped with the necessary means for controlling safety and preventing pollution from offshore oil and gas installations, as decided in the Regulation on the financing of EMSA.
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Draws attention to the crucial role of the three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) in relation to EU-level financial supervision and the banking union; emphasises that the 2016 draft budget
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Draws attention to the crucial role played by the agencies whose main responsibility is to ensure the safety of the various modes of transport, and therefore rejects the proposed cuts in the agencies’ operating budgets and does not agree with proposed cuts that could undermine transport safety.
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Draws attention to the crucial role of the three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) in relation to EU-level financial supervision and the banking union; emphasises that the 2016 draft budget must provide
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Maintains that the Commission should emphasise the strategy of promoting public rather than private transport, and carriage by rail rather than by road; accordingly considers it necessary to provide funding and establish best practice, extending also to local authorities, so as to enable public transport to be made free of charge to residents.
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Draws attention to the crucial role of the three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) in relation to EU-
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Calls on the Commission to provide for budget items to finance innovative technology applications enabling the carriage of goods by road to be properly monitored and supervised so as to prevent any unlawful carriage and combat social dumping and illegal cabotage.
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Draws attention to the crucial role of the three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) in relation to EU-level financial supervision and the banking union; emphasises that the 2016
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Draws attention to the present and future crucial role of the three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) in relation to EU-level financial supervision and the banking union; emphasises that the 2016 draft budget must provide for a sufficient increase in budgetary resources for the ESAs to address the ever-increasing range of tasks being assigned to them, as well as external factors such as exchange rate fluctuations and general increases in levels of pay; points out that the practical limits of effective supervision must not be set by budgetary constraints; encourages a comparison of ESAs’ funding with US agencies in the field of financial sector supervision, including the US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the strategic importance of the Single European Sky as the main instrument to ensure safety, environmental performance, competitiveness and protection of the citizens’ rights; recommends in this regard that CEF should provide sufficient resources for this programme.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that the funding planned for the transport sector is justifiably linked to other policies such as cohesion, competition and security, and that transport infrastructures are at the service of the
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Recalls that the European Parliament strongly supported the creation of the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) and believes that the Union needs to further improve the quality of supervision across the Union; believes that the ESAs play an important part in the functioning of financial markets in the Union;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the strategic importance of the Single European Sky
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Stresses that inflexibility in the ability to second national experts from the supervisory bodies of Member States, as well as strict adherence to language requirements and the Commission Staffing code, has been a contributing factor to difficulties faced by the ESAs in attracting high quality staff for short periods of high need;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the strategic importance of the Single European Sky as the main instrument to ensure safety, competitiveness and protection of the citizens’ rights; recommends in this regard that CEF should provide sufficient resources for
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Points out that the financial transparency of agencies needs to be improved, not least as regards the actual tasks which they perform; considers that appointments should be made on the basis of merit and by public procedures, with published selection criteria and ceilings on salaries.
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Highlights, in this regard, the need for the ESAs to be not only properly financed but also adequately staffed, both numerically and in terms of levels of qualification, to be able to perform the growing tasks assigned to them in a
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Suggests, bearing in mind that there is no direct budgetary line for tourism,
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Highlights, in this regard, the need for the ESAs to be not only properly financed but also adequately staffed, both numerically and in terms of levels of qualification, to be able to perform the tasks assigned to them in a
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Suggests, bearing in mind that there is no direct budgetary line for tourism, using the EU budget for the transport sector as a factor in promoting the tourist attractiveness and competitiveness of the whole ‘Old Continent’; stresses that an efficient cross-collaboration between the numerous
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes the large amount of work the ESAs have done and will continue to do; highlights that close cooperation with national authorities is mandated and should deliver strictly complementary work thus avoiding wasteful duplication;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Suggests, bearing in mind that there is no direct budgetary line for tourism, using the EU budget for the transport sector as a factor in promoting the tourist attractiveness and competitiveness of the whole ‘Old Continent’; stresses that an efficient cross-collaboration between the numerous sectors concerned is desirable in this field. Calls the Commission to review the objectives for action under the COSME programme and believes therefore that increased amounts of (co- )funding for sustainable tourism projects must be reserved within the COSME programme; it must include the support and promotion of cycle routes networks in combination with railways, the protection of natural, cultural, historical and industrial heritage as well as the support for better accessibility to tourism services such as for persons with reduced mobility.
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Notes that the ESAs are currently financed from compulsory contributions by the national member authorities, money from the EU budget and charges payable by the institutions they supervise; finds it regrettable that this nationally oriented, mixed financing system is not used more extensively; renews its call to the Commission, therefore,
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Notes that the ESAs are currently financed from compulsory contributions by the national member authorities, money from the EU budget and charges payable by the institutions they supervise;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Suggests, bearing in mind that there is no direct budgetary line for tourism, using the EU budget for the transport sector as a factor in promoting the tourist attractiveness and competitiveness of the
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Notes that the ESAs are currently financed from compulsory contributions by the national member authorities, money from the EU budget and charges payable by the institutions they supervise; finds it regrettable that this nationally oriented, mixed financing system is not used more extensively; renews its call to the Commission, therefore, to submit by 2017 at the latest a proposal for a financing concept that is either financed completely by charges paid by market operators or at the very least combines financing from a specific line in the general EU budget with charges payable by operators in market; sees this system as a means of securing both the European authorities’ independence from their national member authorities and the full integrity of the ESAs vis-à-vis financial market participants;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 (new) Calls on the introduction of a direct budgetary line for Tourism in the EU’s Budget for 2016.
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Believes all bodies should seek to reduce administrative costs and a detailed rationalisation of any budget expenditure must be delivered; believes that decentralised agencies cannot be exempt from sound budgetary management and welcomes the efforts made to restrain spending on these agencies; calls on all the ESAs to exercise budgetary efficiency and discipline;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 – point 1 (new) (1) Given the financial contribution of the tourism activity to the EU’s GDP and its impacts on job creation, calls to increase the budget for actions in the tourism sector under the COSME programmes in 2016 to 13 million Euro. Calls to avoid further cuts in the budget for the actions in the tourism sector in the current multiannual financial framework (MFF).
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes how the pace of economic recovery and long-term growth prospects in the EU are being affected by the slowdown in investment, reflecting in part budgetary constraints in the Member States; welcomes therefore the draft budget’s strong emphasis, in point 1.1, on creating fresh impetus for jobs, growth
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses, given that the priority aim of European policies is to bring about a recovery in growth and jobs, that infrastructure projects contribute to that recovery both directly – through the jobs created on project sites – and indirectly, through the use and maintenance of this infrastructure and more widely by boosting the competitiveness of the regions concerned; welcomes the fact that, in the discussions on the Juncker plan, all the Member States supported this approach and took the view that investments in strategic infrastructure should not be penalised by the Stability Pact.
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Believes that when additional task are delegated to the ESAs in the future that there should be a cost assessment made at a suitable stage during the legislative process, such as during trialogue negotiations, in order for MEPs and Member States to understand the cost consequences of the proposals they are making;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Points out that agency costs need to be reviewed in the light of the current economic crisis and the sacrifices that people are being asked to make; calls, in addition, for dual headquarters, where they still exist, to be merged into one.
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Notes that the Chair, Executive Director and the members of the Board of Supervisors and Management Boards should be in a position to act independently and only in the interest of the Union; believes that the current financing arrangements of the ESAs have not been fully utilised and do not allow enough flexibility for periods of high short term need that will not be necessary on an ongoing basis which would be best filled by seconded national experts;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Expects the Commission to present an annual overview on tourism projects that have been co-financed by different EU funds.
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Emphasises the increasing importance of greater transparency in relation to corporate taxation and tax rulings and of a coordinated effort to fight tax evasion and avoidance; calls, therefore, for the 2016 draft budget to reflect adequately the importance of the Fiscalis programme for enhancing Member States’ cooperation in the operation of tax systems; calls also for careful consideration of the European Commission´s consultation on corporate tax transparency, especially with regards to country-by-country reporting;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Believes that the Commission should reassess the data on, and the feasibility of, works which over the years have proved, objectively speaking, to be useless and harmful, whether because of the poor economic returns, or because of criminal infiltration, or because of the serious impact on the environment and public health, one such case being the Turin- Lyon section of the TEN-T Mediterranean Corridor.
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Emphasises the increasing importance of greater transparency in relation to corporate taxation and tax rulings and of a coordinated effort to fight tax evasion and avoidance; calls, therefore, for the 2016
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 c (new) 7c. Deplores the fact that the Commission is still not allocating enough funding for the tourism sector, even though it could become a major asset to the European economic recovery.
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 d (new) 7d. Believes that the TEN-T networks, including the financial aspects, should be reviewed with a view to incorporating particularly important routes which have hitherto been excluded, for example the Italian Adriatic stretch on the Scandinavian-Mediterranean corridor.
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission, when implementing the planned restructuring measures with regard to
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Recommends paying particular attention to
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Recommends paying particular attention to transport policy and spending in order to promote accessibility and development of urban and metropolitan areas; reminds that today more than half of the world population lives in cities, and the trend of this phenomenon is growing; therefore believes that the contribution to
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission, when implementing the planned restructuring measures with regard to staff cuts, to focus on its main priorities; emphasises, in that regard, the need to increase staffing in the Directorate-General for Competition, and
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission, when implementing the planned restructuring measures with regard to staff cuts, to focus on its main priorities; emphasises, in that regard, the
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Recommends paying particular attention to transport policy and spending in order to promote accessibility and development of urban and metropolitan areas; reminds that today more than half of the world population lives in cities, and the trend of this phenomenon is growing; therefore believes that the contribution to an efficient, safe and sustainable urban transport sector is a solid contribution to global growth.
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Highlights the need for
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 (new) Calls on the Commission to assist the local, regional, national authorities and stakeholders to explore existing and new EU funding opportunities for public transport and to develop innovative public-private partnership schemes; stresses that the European Structural and Investment Funds should be used more systematically for cities that have developed an integrated local transport plan, such as a Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs), and have identified appropriate actions, in accordance with the criteria in the relevant legislation.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Believes the Commission Draft General Budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016 is a welcome step towards helping Member States tackle structural challenges, especially the loss of competitiveness; believes the EU should prioritise programmes and funding that will deliver growth in the European Union;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Takes note that the agreement on European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) results in cuts in the Connected Europe Facility (CEF); reminds in this regard that there will be an inevitable decrease in investment in some specific areas, since they are less attractive for private investors, by their nature; reminds, for example, that though investments in railways
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Highlights the need for more Europe- wide statistical data of a comprehensive, meaningful, high-quality and up-to-date nature; welcomes, therefore, the provision in the draft budget for a
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Insists that investments in transport infrastructure via the CEF, and research into transport by the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking and the H2020 programme should not serve as an adjustment variable with a view to reaching an agreement on the 2016 budget.
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Emphasises the role of research and innovation in the transport and tourism sectors both for the development of intelligent transport systems and sustainable and clean power, as well as for better security and improved services for consumers; therefore rejects the proposed cuts for research, in particular for payment appropriations.
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Calls for
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses the importance of preserving and strengthening European instruments linked to the air and aeronautical sectors with a view to promoting European standards and technology; stresses, therefore, the strategic role of the European Air Security Agency (EASA) and the SESAR programme, and calls for the necessary resources, particularly financial and human, to be made available to promote their development and accomplish their tasks.
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Calls for wider-ranging implementation of the reforms in the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) recommended in the Maystadt report, thereby also strengthening the European Union’s influence in international accounting standard-setting;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Claims that the representatives in the IASB board should be democratically nominated and accountable. The European Parliament should play its role in selecting European representatives and hold them accountable;
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Asks ESMA to ensure that the European Parliament including the responsible Members and their staff have effective access to documents at the same time as the board of supervisors;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers that in order to solidify the economic recovery in the European Union, the 2016 budget should be higher in real terms vis-à-vis the 2015 budget;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Takes note that the agreement on European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) results in cuts in the Connected Europe Facility (CEF);
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Recalls that the EU budget is mainly an investment budget;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Takes note that the agreement on European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) results in cuts in the Connected Europe Facility (CEF);
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the importance of TEN-T
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Highlights the
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the importance of TEN-T not only as nodal points of connection within Europe, but also as a chance to launch the individual domestic markets, local economies and urban and metropolitan areas; underlines therefore that the CEF should be valued as a system of funding not only for infrastructures but for European policies as a whole; draws attention to the unprecedented interest demonstrated by Member States at the 2014 CEF-T calls and to the great number of submitted eligible proposals; insists in this regard that the provided funding in the MFF must be respected both for commitments and for payments in order to successfully achieve the CEF priorities and objectives.
source: 565.124
2015/08/26
CULT
36 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that the Commission's Draft General Budget 2016 proposes to step up Union support for an emblematic mobility programme such as Erasmus+, which is consistent with the Commission's commitment to increasing student mobility from the current 10% to 20% by the end of the decade;
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the increase of the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) by 31,2% in commitments and 35% in payments compared with 2015; considers that this increase adds to the need to ensure a fair and transparent distribution of annual funding between the different
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Considers that the current refugee crisis shows the need to create significant budgetary room and readiness in the 2016 budget, enabling more swift and substantial support to Member States where most arrivals take place as well as support to Member States as regards their reception and integration of refugees.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that the relevant JHA agencies should not be subject to reduction or redeployment of staff;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that the relevant JHA agencies should not be subject to reduction or redeployment of staff, including the Agency for Fundamental Rights, which should be given more importance in the framework of the European Agenda on Migration and the European Agenda on Security; believes that EASO requires additional staff and more financial support to fulfil its increasing obligations particularly with regard to the urgent relocation
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that the relevant JHA agencies EASO, Eurojust, Frontex and Europol should not be subject to reduction or redeployment of staff; believes that EASO, Eurojust, Frontex and Europol require
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the proposed increase for Frontex as it allows for the extension of the Triton and Poseidon operations;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the proposed increase for Frontex as it allows for the extension of the Triton and Poseidon operations;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls the strong support consistently given by Parliament to adequate funding for culture and media programmes, given their important role in supporting cultural and creative industries; welcomes, therefore, the increase for the Creative Europe Programme, including multimedia actions, compared to the 2015 budget, while expressing reservations regarding the administrative division between its Culture and Media strands; regrets, however, the Council's decreased funding for this programme, as it could give the impression to Union citizens that it underestimates the value of culture as an engine for economic growth and personal development;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the increase of the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) by 31,2% in commitments and 35% in payments compared with 2015; considers that this increase adds to the need to ensure a fair and transparent distribution of funding between the different objectives of AMIF; believes that EU funding for reception and integration of migrants and asylum seekers should be substantially increased, as opposed to the priority which is given today on border control and other costly security measures, such as administrative detention, which have not shown their effectiveness and often contravene rights of migrants; calls on the Commission to primarily allocate additional resources for earmarked specific actions to Member States that volunteer for actions geared towards reception and integration of migrants and asylum seekers; considers it necessary to establish separate budget lines covering the four specific objectives of AMIF and one new budget line for the urgent relocation mechanism;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Believes that a coherent European response to Search and Rescue operations in the Mediterranean must be independent from border management and control missions, and designed as a stand-alone mission; proposes therefore a new budget line for an EU Search and Rescue Fund to reinforce and support Member States search and rescue operations.
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that the budgetary impact of the measures presented as part of the European Agenda on Security, in particular with regard to Europol and its related tasks in the fields of anti-terrorism, organised crime and cybercrime, should be further explained and detailed by the Commission;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that the budgetary impact of the measures presented as part of the European Agenda on Security, in particular with regard to Europol and its related tasks in the fields of anti-terrorism, organised crime and cybercrime, should be further explained and detailed by the Commission; underlines the need to ensure an appropriate budget and level of staffing for Europol for 2016, to allow it to effectively fulfil its tasks
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that the budgetary impact of the measures presented as part of the European Agenda on Security, in particular with regard to Europol and its related tasks in the fields of anti-terrorism, organised crime and cybercrime, should be further explained and detailed by the Commission, specifically with regards to the net budgetary impact of the new counter- terrorism centre; underlines the need to ensure an appropriate budget and level of staffing for Europol for 2016, to allow it to effectively fulfil its tasks.
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that the budgetary impact of the measures presented as part of the European Agenda on Security, in particular with regard to Europol and its related tasks in the fields of anti-terrorism, organised crime
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Regrets that the European Agenda on Security, rather than taking a broader perspective on prevention and human security, instead focuses almost exclusively on repressive measures; therefore opposes the increased resources allocated to the tasks and measures presented herein.
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission to increase funding for preventive actions and measures against violent radicalisation, as part of the European Agenda on Security, in particular through the Radicalisation Awareness Network and its forthcoming Centre of Excellence; reiterates the importance of such measures to fight against terrorism and violent extremism;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls for strengthening EMCDDA in view of the envisaged adoption of the regulation on new psychoactive substances conferring additional tasks on EMCDDA;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Emphasises the need to increase the budget for anti-discrimination and equality policies; calls for specific funding to be allocated to tackle growing antisemitism, islamophobia, afrophobia and antiromism in Member States; calls in particular for the Union to support projects aiming at empowerment of women and girls from the communities concerned.
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Deplores the increase of the budget of Europol, EU-LISA, SIS II and VIS given the serious concerns regards the compliance with Union law on personal data protection and privacy;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Strongly supports the proposed increase for ‘Europe for Citizens’; finds that the decrease in commitments and payments proposed by the Council is politically unjustified, as this programme is vital to civic participation in the democratic process in Europe and is a central instrument for participatory democracy in the Union;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the increase of the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) by 31,2% in commitments and 35% in payments compared with 2015; considers that this increase adds to the need to ensure a fair and transparent distribution of funding between the different objectives of AMIF;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Deeply regrets the fact that in Heading 3 the programmes involving culture and citizenship, such as ‘Creative Europe’ and ‘Europe for Citizens’ have had their budget reduced proportionally more than others in terms of both commitments and payments;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Emphasises the need for solidarity, respect of fundamental rights, justice, and humanitarian asylum and migration policies within the Union; deeply regrets that the Commission and the Council keep increasing its budget for surveillance and repressive 'security' measures, as well as imposing budget cuts on welfare and public services, a development that have had a detrimental impact on the fundamental rights of women, men and children living in the Union.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Points out that since the launch of the Cultural and Creative Sectors Guarantee Facility (CCSGF) in the framework of the ‘Creative Europe’ programme is planned for 2016, the fund needs to be allocated enough money in the first year of implementation to secure an effective start;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Welcomes the increase of ISF as the border protection and security are key issues for the Union, including enhancing security agenda and European Counter Terrorist Centre.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that investments in education, training, cultural and creative industries, as well as in research, should be included in the EFSI as they are a key factor for social inclusion which, at a later stage, will translate into investment decisions and sustainable economic growth, and – in the long run – competitiveness;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is of the opinion that, instead of the current ad-hoc decision-making, a more long-term approach to search and rescue
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Points out, in general, that decreased funding to European programmes in the fields of culture and education, and the delays in the finalisation of contracts and in payments between authorities and beneficiaries, endanger the full implementation of the programmes by theCommission and undermine the citizens' trust and the credibility of Institutions of the Union;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is of the opinion that, instead of the current ad-hoc decision-making, a more long-term approach to
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is of the opinion that, instead of the current ad-hoc decision-making, a more long-term approach to search and rescue operations is necessary
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the proposal to mobilise the flexibility instrument to finance part of the urgent relocation mechanism but considers that the ceiling
source: 565.049
2015/08/27
FEMM
11 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Recalls the Joint Declaration of the three institutions that the annual budgetary procedures applied for the MFF 2014-2020 will integrate, as appropriate, gender- responsive elements; emphasises that gender equality should be included as a horizontal principle in all Union policies and gender analysis and gender budgeting should become an integral part of the budgetary procedure at all its stages, including projects, definition, implementation, monitoring and evaluation; calls therefore for a comprehensive implementation of gender budgeting, which includes assessment by the Court of Auditors of the general budget of the Union from a gender perspective;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Calls for increased EU funding to support reception facilities for asylum seekers in different Member States, and in particular efforts to ensure the safety and equal treatment of the increasing numbers of women asylum seekers;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 d (new) 6d. Urges that the provision of humanitarian aid by the EU and the Member States should not be subject to restrictions imposed by other partner donors regarding necessary medical treatment, including access to safe abortion for women and girls who are victims of rape in armed conflicts, and should instead follow international humanitarian law;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls for the adoption of 'gender budgeting' in both European and national strategies for more effective promotion of gender equality; highlights the need to earmark increased funding for the fight against all forms of violence and discrimination against women and girls;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises that in order to boost jobs, growth and investment, which is a key priority of the 2016 draft budget, special attention has to be paid to the empowerment of women in business, science, education and labour markets in order to make greater use of the existing
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises that in order to boost jobs, sustainable growth and investment, which is a key priority of the 2016 draft budget, investments in care infrastructures are essential, special attention also has to be paid to the empowerment of women in the public sector, business, science, education and labour markets in order to make greater use of the existing human capital, while achieving equality between women and men; repeats its call to use the European Structural and Investment Funds to achieve this objective;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that with regard to the under- representation of women among entrepreneurs, in all schemes aiming to support entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship, special attention should be paid to women; access to finance including microfinance for female entrepreneurs must be facilitated;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls for resources to be allocated from Union funds to promote women´s rights and gender equality through education, health services, notably sexual and reproductive health and rights services, girls empowerment, and women's political representation;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Asks the European Commission to work on ensuring transparent information on the actions selected for funding in order to allow for a proper scrutiny of the implementation of the specific objective of preventing and combatting violence;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls for increased measures aimed directly at disadvantaged groups of women, investing in high-quality public services and, specifically, guaranteeing adequate provision of high-quality services for childcare, elderly care and care of other dependent persons, and calls for genuine budgetary transparency in respect of the funds (ESF, PROGRESS, DAPHNE) allocated to gender equality policies;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Deplores the failure of the austerity policies imposed on several Member States, and in particular its negative impact on women and gender equality; calls for EU investments and budgetary priorities to focus on counteracting these impacts, through investments in public care services, investments in education and health, as well as through a coherent use of gender budgeting;
source: 565.056
2015/09/02
DEVE
6 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers the cuts in the Development Cooperation Instrument lines particularly inappropriate in light of the massive financing needs of the new Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Union's pledge, renewed in connection with the UN's financing for development conference in July this year
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes the growth of the number of refugees and IDPs in the world to an unprecedented level of 60 million and the consequent growth in the need for humanitarian aid; welcomes the Council's maintenance of the humanitarian aid amounts in the Commission's Draft Budget;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes the growth of the number of refugees and IDPs in the world to an unprecedented level of 60 million and the consequent growth in the need for humanitarian aid; welcomes the Council's maintenance of the humanitarian aid amounts in the Commission's Draft Budget; considers, however, that €26 million should be added to line 23 02 01 and used for education in refugee camps as well as in emergencies and crisis situations, as this can provide life-saving skills, help children build a future and shield them from radicalisation;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Holds that given the current refugee crisis, the Draft Budget amounts on line 21 02 07 05 for migration and asylum must not be reduced, but should rather be increased; stresses that this line should be used for measures to address
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
source: 565.146
2015/09/04
CONT
12 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Asks the Commission and the Member States to improve transparency in regard to the recoveries, especially in regard to the year in which payment is made, the year in which the related error is detected and the year in which recoveries or financial corrections are disclosed in the notes to the accounts;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 c (new) 7c. Considering that due to its new 'better regulation' policies the Commission is proposing far less legislative initiatives than in the past, calls on the Commission to explain in detail the budgetary and staffing implications of this shift in emphasis from legislative to implementing activities and, in particular, to indicate whether economies can be made in this regard;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Urges the Commission to report to Parliament on EU funded measures to combat youth unemployment
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls on the budgetary authorities to reflect on the Union's efforts to prevent and combat fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting its financial interests; emphasises in this respect that budgetary cuts in programmes such as HERCULE or AFIS would be detrimental to the budget of the European Union, as they support OLAF and the Member States to protect the Union's financial interests;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission to provide Parliament with a summary of the costs actually incurred and the funding tranches made available for the structural fund projects already funded during the 2000-2006 and 2007-2013 funding periods and for those which have still not yet been completed;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Reiterates its demand that the Commission draft proposals to sanction false or incorrect reporting by the Member States' authorities in the management of European Union funds; recalls that almost all paying agencies for direct payments were accredited and certified by the certifying authorities in the Member States and is therefore concerned that some paying agencies have particularly high error rates; calls in this context on the Member States to implement a 'better spending' of the EU budget by ensuring more effective and efficient national management and control systems;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Reiterates its demand that the Commission draft proposals to sanction false or incorrect reporting by the Member States’ authorities in the management of European Union funds; also calls on the Commission to submit proposals for ways in which Member States can strengthen ex-ante checks so as to reduce the number of sums unduly paid, and secure a system whereby proper investigations are carried out into suspicions of false or incorrect reporting and such reporting is sanctioned;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to include in its annual report on the protection of the EU’s financial interests and the fight against fraud an assessment of the impact of corruption in each Member State on EU funds in the relevant year, and to set out a specific, targeted plan of action to combat such corruption;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Urges the Commission to improve transparency in the use of financial engineering instruments (FEI), to regularly report on leverage, losses and risks and to present a cost-benefit analysis of FEIs compared with more direct forms of project funding; calls on the Commission to implement effective monitoring systems to analyse the demand for financial instruments in the Member States, which would lower the risk of overcapitalisation;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. In this regard, calls on the Commission to pay particular attention to the functioning of the decentralised agencies of the EU and, in particular, to their visibility and democratic accountability, in light of their distant locations and of lack of awareness of EU citizens of their activities and even of their existence;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Reminds that there is an urgent need to concentrate on the accountability and performance of the use of the budget of the European Union; therefore, calls for the development of concrete evaluation mechanisms and indicators;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Calls on the Commission to explain in detail its transparency policies with regard to EU funding, and, in particular, its measures to provide for balanced decision-making, involving all relevant stakeholders, including consumer organisations, SME's, trade unions and general interest organisations, in particular environmental organisations;
source: 567.465
2015/10/06
BUDG
119 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 a (new) - having regard to Articles 174 to 178 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that Parliament has, from the outset, placed a particular focus on migration and refugees in the 2016 budget; recalls its earlier statements that the handling of migration flows lies at the crossroads of internal and external solidarity and that external financing instruments should also be mobilised, in an integrated approach, in order to address the root causes of the
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 77 a (new) 77a. OTHER STAFF RELATED ISSUES Recalls that the need for new posts in the General Secretariat should be covered by internal redeployment, unless the need for creating new posts is duly justified and demonstrated, and confirmed by the internal auditors under the responsibility of the Parliament's Bureau;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 77 b (new) 77b. Recalls that any reorganisation of parliamentary work or of the procedures should not lead to a deterioration in the working conditions and social rights of staff, regardless of their position;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 77 c (new) 77c. Notes that the new rules regarding parliamentary assistance are currently being prepared; reiterates its conviction that a new balance is necessary between accredited parliamentary assistants and local assistants; requests therefore the Secretary-General to present to the Bureau a proposal for a decision before the end of 2015 addressing, inter alia, the following issues: ‒ limiting the number of local assistants by Member while respecting specific conditions of exercising the Members' mandate in different Member States; ‒ regulating distribution of the allowance between local and accredited parliamentary assistance; ‒ reforming the current salary cap system for local assistance with a longer term perspective of getting closer to the principle of "equal pay for equal work"; ‒ introducing a minimum salary and a maximum ceiling for the remuneration of local assistants in different Member States; ‒ covering current staff of national delegations under the Statute for the Parliament's accredited assistants; calls on the Secretary-General to take all the necessary measures to ensure that the trainees working for the Members are entitled to viable scholarship and to social protection and that the implementation of the said rules in controlled by the Parliament's services; invites the Secretary-General to introduce a mandatory training on respect and dignity in work for the Members and their assistants; Underlines that a transition period should be respected in the case of the revision of the current rules; invites the Secretary- General and the Bureau to report to the Committee on Budgets on the resulting revised rules as soon as possible and not later than by February 2016, in due time for the preparation of the Parliament's estimates for the financial year 2017; expects that the final decision will enter into force as of year 2017 at the latest;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 77 d (new) 77d. Reiterates its commitment to support multilingualism in parliamentary work through high standards of interpretation and translation; requests updated information on the consequences of non- agreement on new working conditions for interpreters (spring 2015) to be communicated to the Committee on Budgets by February 2016 at the latest; expects the Secretary-General to use all flexibility required to ensure high quality interpretation and translation service for Members;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 77 e (new) 77e. Asks the Secretary-General to provide a detailed overview of all the posts in Parliament in the years 2014-2016, including distribution of posts by services, categories and types of contracts; considers that this overview should be validated by the internal auditors under the responsibility of the Parliament's Bureau and should be communicated to the Committee on Budgets before September 2016;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -78 a (new) -78a. PROPERTY POLICY Recalls that the Committee on Budgets should be informed on a regular basis about new developments in the Parliament's building policy and should be consulted in due time, that is before a contract is obtained, on any building project having financial implications; confirms that financial impact of any building project will be closely scrutinised;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -78 b (new) -78b. Believes that decisions related to building projects should be subject to an open dialogue and should ensure a transparent decision making process;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -78 c (new) -78c. Reiterates once again its calls for the new mid-term building strategy to be presented to the Committee on Budgets as soon as possible and at the latest by early 2016, in time for the preparation of the Parliament's estimates for the financial year 2017; invites the Secretary-General to present to the Committee on Budgets a possible long-term strategy until 2025 early in advance before the Parliament's reading of the budget in the autumn 2016;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 a (new) 78a. AUDIT Demands that the internal auditors of the Parliament are placed under the direct responsibility of the Bureau;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Rejects any use of the Union budget to finance a militarist and securitarian Union; underlines the need for alternative policies which support sustainable development, strengthened environment- friendly internal demand based on progressive wages, full employment with rights, social welfare, eradicating poverty and social exclusion and improved social and economic cohesion;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 b (new) 78b. Following the internalisation and re- organisation of the security services of the Parliament, calls for an independent audit of DG SAFE to assess whether financial and human resources are being used in the best possible way; believes that the independent audit should be mandated by the Parliament's Bureau and should be reported directly to the Bureau ; believes that the results of that audit should be communicated to the Committee on Budgets by September 2016, before the start of the Parliament's reading of the budget;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 c (new) 78c. MEMBERS' EXPENSES Reiterates the appeal for greater transparency regarding the general expenditure allowance for the Members; calls on the Parliament's Bureau to work on a definition of more precise rules regarding the accountability of the expenditure authorised under this allowance, without generating additional costs to the Parliament;
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 d (new) 78d. Reiterates the appeal for greater transparency regarding the general expenditure allowance for the Members; calls on the Parliament's Bureau to work on a definition of more precise rules regarding the accountability of the expenditure authorised under this allowance including, inter alia, an annual declaration by Members, retention period of payment proof, detailed arrangements of random controls;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 e (new) 78e. Asks the Secretary General to open negotiations with the main actors in the transport sector in order to obtain more advantageous tariffs, and, as a consequence, to reduce the travel expenses of Members and staff;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 86 a (new) 86a. Reiterates the importance of its missions regarding the involvement of civil society and social partners in the Union activities, particularly in the establishment of common rules aiming to protect public services within its territories;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 90 a (new) 90a. Reiterates the need for the local and regional authorities of the Union to support its activities;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 93 93.
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 94 94.
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 94 94. Is convinced that the Union budget can contribute to addressing effectively not only the consequences but also the root causes of the crises that the Union is currently facing;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 94 a (new) 94a. Underlines that, barely two years after the beginning of the current MFF, the Commission had to request the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument twice, as well as the deployment of the Contingency Margin, in order to cover pressing and unforeseen needs that could not possibly be financed within the existing MFF ceilings; also notes that the Global Margin for Commitments in 2015, the first year of its operation, was immediately utilised to its full extent while two important Union programmes needed to be reduced to allow for the financing of new initiatives; stresses that new commitments are no longer available in 2016 to finance key political Union objectives, like youth employment; clearly sees that the available flexibility mechanisms in the MFF have already been pushed to their limits, due to the tight MFF ceilings in most headings; considers that these developments make the case for a substantial MFF mid-term revision; eagerly anticipates the Commission proposals to that effect in the course of 2016;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Underlines, however, that those amendments should be considered alongside the Commission’s Letter of Amendment 2/2016, which is expected to include, in addition to the second relocation package, the additional measures set out in the Commission communication of 23 September 2015;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Decides to also take action with regard to the ongoing crisis affecting European farmers, notably in the dairy sector, and to already integrate in its position
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Decides to also take action with regard to the ongoing crisis affecting European farmers, notably in the dairy sector, and to already integrate in its position on the 2016 budget the EUR 500 million support emergency measures announced by the Commission; welcomes the decision by the Commission to preserve the reserve for crises in the agricultural sector in the 2016 budget in full under Heading 2 for the following budget year for direct payments to farmers as provided for in Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013; trusts that the Commission's Letter of Amendment 2/2016 will allow the exact budget lines that will be reinforced in this context to be determined;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Acknowledges that a lot more effort needs to be undertaken to address the shortcomings in the Union economy
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Acknowledges that a lot more effort needs to be undertaken to address the shortcomings in the Union economy by boosting competitiveness, growth and quality jobs; emphasises the key role played by micro, small
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Acknowledges that a lot more effort needs to be undertaken to address the shortcomings in the Union economy by boosting competitiveness, growth and jobs; emphasises the key role played by small and medium-sized enterprises in this regard, particularly in the rural and peri- urban areas; reinforces therefore the COSME programme by EUR 16,5 million; decides also to propose new commitments in 2016 for the continuation of the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI), whose entire financial envelope was frontloaded in the years 2014-2015; acknowledges the significant contribution of this programme to the fight against unemployment and is determined to ensure that the necessary appropriations are made available in order to prevent a funding gap in its implementation; adopts, therefore, a EUR 473,2 million increase for 2016, corresponding to the original instalment that was foreseen for the YEI on a yearly basis;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Reiterates its conviction that the Union budget should not finance new initiatives to the detriment of existing Union programmes and policies and disregard
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Reiterates its conviction that the Union budget should not finance new initiatives to the detriment of existing Union programmes and policies and disregard political commitments already made;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that Parliament's reading of the 2016 budget fully reflects the political priorities adopted by an overwhelming majority in its abovementioned resolutions of 11 March 2015 on general guidelines and of 8 July 2015 on a mandate for the trilogue; recalls that those consist in observing common treaties and agreements by all Member States, in internal and external solidarity, in particular an effective tackling of the migration and refugee crisis, as well as in boosting competitiveness through employment, enterprises and entrepreneurship (the “three Es”), while fully adhering to the need for budgetary restraint and to respect the payments plan as agreed by the Commission, Council and Parliament;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Acknowledges that a lot more effort needs to be undertaken to address the shortcomings in the Union economy, in particular ensuring adequate levels of financing to the SME sector in particular, in spite of the state capitalisation of several credit institutions from the outset of the economic crisis; believes that public Banking Structures, especially innovative ones, can now play a crucial role in the Member States' economic recovery, in particular as these focus on the regional economy, on cooperation between constituent banks, and on sustainable and local lending to the SME sector; believes that such structures, due to their specific organisation, objectives and proximity to the potential beneficiaries, in particular to SMEs, which can be furthermore enhanced within the framework of the EFSI, can now offer added stability and promote regional development in recovering economies and should be further supported;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses the importance of fully respecting the joint statement on a payment plan 2015-2016 agreed between Parliament, Council and Commission, following the shared commitment to reduce the backlog of outstanding payment claims for the 2007-2013 cohesion programmes to around EUR 2 billion by the end of 2016 and to avoid any future build-up of such an unsustainable backlog; considers, for this reason, that the frontloading of EUR 1 billion in 2016 for Greece
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses the importance of fully respecting the joint statement on a payment plan 2015-2016 agreed between Parliament, Council and Commission, following the shared commitment to reduce the backlog of outstanding payment claims for the 2007-2013 cohesion programmes to around EUR 2 billion by the end of 2016 and to avoid any future build-up of such an unsustainable backlog; criticises in this respect that the Council's cuts in its reading on the 2016 budget go against the agreement in the joint statement plan; considers, for this
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses the importance of fully respecting the joint statement on a payment plan 2015-2016 agreed between Parliament, Council and Commission, following the shared commitment to reduce the backlog of outstanding payment claims for the 2007-2013 cohesion programmes to around EUR 2 billion by the end of 2016 and to avoid any future build-up of such an unsustainable backlog; calls on the Commission and the Council to engage in a fundamental conversation on the causes of the backlog, leading towards concrete proposals that address the dynamics that create recurring payment problems; considers, for this reason, that the frontloading of EUR 1 billion in 2016 for Greece should be financed by additional appropriations within the MFF payments' ceiling; stresses its long-standing position that payments deriving from commitments mobilised under the Flexibility Instrument are counted over and above that ceiling;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Restores all cuts proposed by Council to the DB (EUR 563,6 million in commitments and EUR 1 421,8 million in payments); regrets the tendency of the Council to consider the budget as a financial item added as a burden to national budgets, and to disregard the Union added value of Union expenditure; fails to understand the reasoning behind the proposed cuts, for
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Concludes that, for the purpose of adequately financing these pressing needs, with migratory pressures a priority and considering the very tight MFF margins in 2016, all budget lines with low implementation rates or with little Union added value must contribute in the significant levels of redeployment needed to meet these needs and means available in the MFF Regulation in terms of flexibility, including the full mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument,
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Concludes that, for the purpose of adequately financing these pressing needs, and considering the very tight MFF margins in 2016, all means available in the MFF Regulation in terms of flexibility, including the full mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument, will need to be deployed; expects that the Council will share this approach and that an agreement will easily be reached in conciliation, allowing the Union to rise to the occasion and effectively respond to the challenges ahead; stresses, in this respect, that the global MFF margin for commitments from 2015 should be mobilised as soon as the legal conditions are fulfilled; expects to reach a pre- agreement with the Council and the Commission on this issue;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Concludes that, for the purpose of adequately financing these pressing needs, and considering the very tight MFF
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Regrets that Commission expert groups continue to be excessively dominated by corporate interests;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that Parliament's reading of the 2016 budget fully reflects the political priorities adopted by an overwhelming majority in its abovementioned resolutions of 11 March 2015 on general guidelines and of 8 July 2015 on a mandate for the trilogue; recalls that those consist in internal and external solidarity, in particular an effective tackling of the migration and refugee crisis, as well as in boosting
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Underlines that the current challenges the Union is facing once more disclose the budgetary restrictions set with the current MFF 2014-2020 to appropriately react to ongoing crises; therefore calls on the Commission to present an ambitious proposal for the revision of the MFF as soon as possible in 2016;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 c (new) 11c. Is encouraged by the Budget Commissioner's discourse on gender equality and consequently asks the Commission to deepen its reflection on how to integrate gender budgeting principles into the Union budget and to make concrete proposals in the course of 2016;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Ascertains the need to revise the MFF at mid-term to boost the Union budget;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Underlines that, for the sake of a coherent approach, several cuts applied by the Council on the ground of a low absorption capacity on many Heading 1a programmes in June 2015 have now to be reversed due the strong acceleration in these programmes' implementation in September 2015, in particular programmes which support education, research, training and culture, especially those dedicated to the youth; notes that this is a general trend, in line with the life cycle of these programmes; decides therefore to restore the DB level on the lines cut by the Council both in commitments and in payments;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Highlights that the Union austerity policies have created a downward pressure on real wages in Member States and that this will prolong impact of the economic and social crisis; underlines that the Union budget shall be used to underpin efforts to increase real wages as well as to fight social dumping in the Member States;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Calls upon the Commission to analyse the financial burden caused by fees and charges due within obligatory certification and licensing procedures; urges the Commission to provide a proper evaluation of the impact of those costs on the competitiveness of industrial companies and SMEs;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Decides to increase
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that Parliament's reading of the 2016 budget fully reflects the political priorities adopted by an overwhelming majority in its abovementioned resolutions of 11 March 2015 on general guidelines and of 8 July 2015 on a mandate for the trilogue; recalls that those consist in internal and external solidarity, in particular an effective tackling of the
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Decides to increases above the DB the three supervisory agencies (EBA, EIOPA and ESMA) and ACER to provide them with adequate resources to face their increasing tasks; further asks for an assessment of the activities of different Union agencies in view of identifying potential synergies and horizontal integration opportunities in order to realize efficiency gains;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Confirms its support for the ITER programme and is committed to securing its appropriate financing; is concerned
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Confirms its support for the ITER programme and is committed to securing its appropriate financing; is concerned, however, about possible further delays and additional costs of this programme as well as the related potential repercussions on the Union budget; regrets, therefore, that it was unable to assess the level of the 2016 ITER appropriations against the updated payment plan and schedule, which is only due to be presented in the ITER Council in November 2015; expects, however, that this revised plan will provide sufficient evidence that Parliament's recommendations, as set out in the relevant 2013 discharge resolution8 , have been properly taken into account and that financial soundness and spending efficiency will be ensured; intends to raise this matter in the 2016 budgetary conciliation; moreover, is alarmed by the current lack of transparency regarding the use of Fusion for Energy's contributions to the ITER programme; calls for a proper accountability mechanism giving a clear overview of the amount of the financial resources provided to the international project and evaluating their efficient use; __________________ 8 European Parliament resolution of 29 April 2015 with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy for the
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Underlines the huge discrepancy between funding for nuclear activities in the Union budget and support for future- oriented renewable energy; believes therefore that abandoning the ITER project would free up much needed resources, which could be used for investing into already working renewable energy technologies;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Believes that the Euratom budget line on Nuclear fission and radiation protection should be reoriented towards the decommissioning of nuclear power plants; in the same vein, believes that the appropriations for nuclear activities of the Joint Research Centre should be used only for activities necessary for implementing safeguards;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Disapproves of Council's proposed cuts of EUR 3,1 million in commitments and, more importantly, EUR 220,1 million in payments under subheading 1b, including on completion lines; calls on the Council to explain how these cuts are compatible with the objective, on the one hand, of reducing the backlog of outstanding payment claims for the 2007-2013 cohesion programmes to around EUR 2 billion by the end of 2016 and, on the other hand, of avoiding negative repercussions and unnecessary delays for the implementation of the 2014- 2020 programmes; recalls that according to Article 310 TFEU, the revenue and expenditure shown in the Union budget shall be in balance; underlines the negative impact caused by the delays in payments to local, regional and national authorities, in particular those which are facing social, financial and economic constraints;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Recalls that cohesion policy represents the main Union investment policy and its legal objective of reducing disparities between European regions by strengthening economic, social and territorial cohesion;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new) 20b. Expresses its disapproval for the institutionalisation of the principles of macroeconomic conditionality and performance reserve and the link between cohesion policy and Structural Funds on the one hand and Stability and Growth Pact, package of economic governance and any economic agreement of Member States, on the other; believes that the assumptions underlying them are undeniably different and their objectives diametrically opposed; emphasises that the purpose of cohesion policy should not be to impose stringent macroeconomic and financial conditions necessitating austerity measures or to penalise Member States and regions; stresses that cohesion policy is designed to ensure balanced growth and eliminate inequalities with a view to achieving genuine convergence; indicates that funding for European regions cannot be suspended for non- compliance by Member States with macroeconomic conditions and suspending funding for Member States in difficulties will make the situation worse;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Notes the Commission's preliminary assessment, based on Member States' latest forecasts, that programme implementation in the area of cohesion policy is likely to be delayed in 2016; is alarmed that any significant underspending in the third year of implementation of the new European Structural and Investment Funds cycle, at a time when programmes should be reaching full swing, will not only have a detrimental effect on the timely achievement of results on the ground, but may also lead to serious pressure on payments in subsequent years, possibly reconstituting a backlog of unpaid bills; urges the Member States concerned to make speedy progress in tackling the underlying causes of these delays in implementation, such as through the prompt designation of programme authorities and the non-multiplication and simplification of national administrative procedures; requests the Commission to closely monitor the situation and make appropriate proposals as needed;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Highlights that climate- (20% target) and environment-friendly spending is only one side of the coin; the other side necessitates increasing efforts to more closely monitor and phase out harmful funding;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Insists on the need to improve the active management of payments by the Commission while accelerating the calls for proposals and in particular increasing the pre-financing available; believes that the postponement of such measures will aggravate discrepancies and jeopardise the objectives of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, quality job creation, economic, social and territorial cohesion; recalls in this respect the conclusions of the 6th Cohesion Report, in particular that regional disparities in the Union widened dramatically during the period 2008-2011, and insists that the cohesion policy needs to be significantly increased;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 b (new) 21b. Considers that the preservation and the valorisation of cultural heritage closely linked to remembrance sites and places require appropriate Union financial support, namely via Structural Funds;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22.
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Welcomes the Commission's ambition to play a stronger role in the preparation and implementation of programmes under the European Structural and Investment Funds; demands in particular that the requirements for the involvement of local and regional actors as well as civil society organisations are met to increase ownership of the policy and reach Union targets in the field of climate change and poverty reduction; calls on the Member States to take full advantage of available instruments and methodologies such as climate change tracking to increase the visibility of their efforts;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 b (new) 22b. Recalls that the Student Loan Guarantee Facility should be implemented on favourable terms for students, regardless of their social background and that this additional and innovative tool for learning mobility should neither replace any current, nor impede the development of any future grant or loan system supporting student mobility at local, national or Union level;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 c (new) 22c. Underlines that instruments such as the ESF, the ERDF, the Cohesion Fund or the Youth Employment Initiative are crucial to support the creation of quality and sustainable jobs, to ensure investment for targeted social and cohesion policies, to foster convergence and narrow the development gap while reducing social, economic, local, regional and national disparities; recalls the need to enhance the fight against poverty, unemployment, social exclusion and inequalities (income) through instruments such as the Aid to the most Deprived and Fruit and Milk for Schools; insists, therefore, on the need to increase the proposed payment appropriations to the bare minimum needed in this subheading;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24.
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Welcomes the presentation by the Commission of a EUR 500 million comprehensive package of emergency measures to support European farmers, notably in the dairy sector amid falling commodity prices and greater milk production; stresses that the effects are most severe in remote areas where the socio-economic importance of the dairy sector is unquestionable; incorporates this
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Calls on the Commission to deliver before November 2015 a first assessment on the implementation of cross- compliance and revisions to standards of Good Agricultural and Environmental Conditions and whether any additional environmental benefit has been delivered through the restructuring and the greening of CAP;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 b (new) 25b. Insists on the need for added support to small farms as these keep many direct jobs in rural areas and are necessary to maintain the occupied territory and care; insists on the prioritisation of the promotion and advertisement of local markets and activities which raise awareness of their contribution to local economies; calls on the Commission and the Member States to prioritise public policies which phase out the causes that provoke price volatility of agricultural products, which occurs more frequently and has adverse effects on farmers' incomes;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Highlights that the Union is currently facing a number of serious emergencies, notably the unprecedented migration and refugee crisis, the extent of which could not have been foreseen in the aforementioned resolution or mandate for rilogue; understands that this crisis cannot be solved by financial resources alone; is convinced nevertheless that the necessary financial resources need to be deployed in the Union budget and will probably have to be substantially increased in 2016, in order to match the political challenges and allow the Union to deliver and effectively respond to th
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Calls on Member States to ensure a fair distribution of funds by increasing support for sustainable farming systems, which preserve biodiversity, protect water resources and soil fertility, respect animal welfare and employment;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b (new) 26b. Considers export refunds to be trade distorting and in contradiction to the Union development goals; supports therefore their complete elimination;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 c (new) 26c. Reiterates that CAP appropriations or any other appropriations from the budget should not be used for financing lethal bull fighting activities; recalls that such funding is a clear violation of the European Convention for the protection of animals kept for farming purposes (Council Directive 98/58/EC);
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Recalls that the DB provided for reinforcements in the area of security and migration, including a EUR 150 million
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Decides, in light of the current, exceptional flows of migrants and refugees to concentrate its reinforcements on strengthening the AMIF; str
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Decides, in light of the current, exceptional
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Decides, in light of the current,
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Decides, in light of the current, exceptional flows of migrants and refugees to concentrate its reinforcements on strengthening the AMIF; strongly supports in this context the second EUR 780 million package on the relocation of 120 000 persons; decides to incorporate it in its reading, and to align the first relocation package with the second one by adding EUR 20 million to finance transport costs (EUR 500 per migrant to Italy and Greece); approves an additional increase of EUR 79 million for general reinforcements of the AMIF; stresses the importance of a proper financing of return operations in accordance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the principle of 'non- refoulement' in order to achieve an effective return policy, preventing and reducing irregular migration; finally decides to reinforce the
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Decides, in light of the current, exceptional flows of migrants and refugees to concentrate its reinforcements on strengthening the AMIF; strongly supports in this context the second EUR 780 million package on the relocation of 120 000 persons; decides to incorporate it in its reading, and to align the first relocation package with the second one by adding EUR 20 million to finance transport costs (EUR 500 per migrant to Italy and Greece); approves an additional increase of EUR 79 million for general reinforcements of the AMIF; finally decides to reinforce the agencies with migration-related tasks for a total of EUR 26 million;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. finally decides to reinforce the agencies with migration-related tasks for a total of EUR 26 million, with the European Asylum Support Office (EASO) receiving the biggest increase of EUR 12 million above the DB; reminds that this agency plays a central, coordinating role in the implementation of the provisional measures in the area of international protection and is increasingly being called upon to assist the Member States concerned;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Highlights that the Union is currently facing a number of serious emergencies, notably the unprecedented migration and refugee crisis; is convinced that
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31.
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Furthermore, deems it necessary, given their important role in supporting cultural and creative industries that represent key European values, to increase, by a total of EUR 10,5 million in commitment and payments appropriations above the DB the culture and media sub-programmes, including the Multimedia Actions, and the Cultural and Creative Sectors Guarantee Facility (CCSGF) planned for 2016 and intended to tackle the critical issue of access to finance for SMEs and organisations in the cultural and creative sectors;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Considers it also a priority to reinforce the Europe for Citizens' programme with EUR 1,5 million as well as modifying the
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 35.
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 a (new) 35a. Believes that the Union budget can be instrumental in reaching out to people in need and insists that a budgetary shift away from military and security spending and towards a civil and development oriented foreign policy is needed in order to reduce long-term military spending; reiterates its position that funds under this heading must be committed to a peaceful and civil foreign policy, which ensures that the Union's commitments to poverty eradication, sustainable development, MDGs, arms-control, NPT-regime, and nuclear disarmament are upheld; notes that this demonstrates a high level of solidarity with third countries while insisting on the need to adopt a comprehensive and human rights-based approach linking migration with development and guaranteeing the integration of migrant workers and asylum seekers and refugees; recalls the need to implement further measures to enhance an endogenous development to boost a sound mutually beneficial relationship and promoting European fundamental values;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 37. Complements the package of amendments on migration and the refugee crisis by adopting targeted reinforcements in commitment appropriations first and foremost within the European Neighbourhood Instrument (+ EUR 178,1 million) but also in the Development Cooperation Instrument (+ EUR 26,6 million), Humanitarian aid (+ EUR 26 million), the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (+ EUR 11,2 million), the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace (+ EUR 12,6 million) and the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (+ EUR 1 million); while supporting, where necessary, reprioritisation within those programmes to
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 38.
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 38. Calls for these extra appropriations to be used in particular to increase the funding for the Union Regional Trust Fund in Response to the Syrian Crisis and for the Emergency Trust Fund for stability and
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 38. Calls for these extra appropriations to be used in particular to increase the funding for the Union Regional Trust Fund in Response to the Syrian Crisis and for the Emergency Trust Fund for stability and addressing root causes of irregular migration and displaced persons in Africa, as well as for immediate assistance via the UNHCR and the World Food Programme; reiterates the need to adopt a comprehensive and human rights-based approach linking migration with development and guaranteeing the integration of migrant workers and asylum seekers and refugees while supporting a new political and budgetary commitment towards countries of origin and transit; calls on the individual Member States to bring additional contributions to the Trust Funds and to the UN agencies without further delay; notes that the pipeline of projects potentially funded by the Trust Funds further weakens the Council’s case for an alleged lack of absorption capacity in Heading 4;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 39. Reinforces by EUR 40 million the budget line for support for the peace process and financial assistance to Palestine and to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA);
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Highlights that the Union is currently facing a number of serious emergencies, notably the unprecedented migration and refugee crisis; is convinced that the necessary financial resources need to be deployed in the Union budget, in order to match the political challenges and allow the Union to deliver and effectively respond to those crises, as a matter of utmost urgency and priority; considers that extraordinary times require extraordinary measures and that a strong political commitment is needed to secure fresh appropriations for this purpose; underlines, in this regard, that solidarity is an underlying principle of the Union budget; is concerned that, in the refugee crisis, solidarity appears in an uneven way across Member States; asks the Commission to come up with a proposal on how the Union budget can prompt Member States towards a more balanced approach to solidarity;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 a (new) 39a. Recalls that in order to alleviate damaging long term effects that stem from humanitarian crisis it is essential to ensure that children affected continue to receive an education; therefore increases funding for supporting education in the Humanitarian aid budget so that it accounts for 3 % instead of 1 %, with the aim of reaching a threshold of 4 % by 2019;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 a (new) 40a. Deems it necessary to increase appropriations for the Turkish Cypriot Community budget line (Article 13 07 01) for the purpose of contributing decisively to the continuation and intensification of the mission of the Committee on Missing Persons in Cyprus and of supporting the bicommunal Technical Committee on Cultural Heritage, thus promoting trust and reconciliation between the two communities;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 a (new) 44a. Recommends that, while complying with the best management and accountability criteria, Union institutions must ensure that third contract parties conform with labour law provisions, in particular the fundamental right of workers to negotiate and agree on working conditions and wages with their employer, therefore the institutions should as far as possible make use of airlines which recognise trade unions and which have a good repute with respect to workers' rights;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 46. Considers, therefore, that any further cuts proposed by the Council
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 47. Decides to increase, within the overall
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 48 48. Decides furthermore to increase the 2016 budget appropriations for the three financial supervisory agencies due to their additional tasks and increased workload;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 51 51. Emphasises therefore again its opposition to the concept of a redeployment pool amongst agencies, but reaffirms its openness to free posts by means of achieving efficiency gains between agencies through increased administrative cooperation or even analyse the possibilities of mergers where appropriate and through pooling certain functions with either the Commission or another agency;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 52 52. Underlines once more that that posts financed from industry have no impact on the Union Budget and therefore should not be subject to the staff reduction at all
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 53 Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 55 a (new) 55a. Recalls that current efforts to manage the risk of an unsustainable backlog should be complemented by efforts that address the innate conflict between the Council on the one hand and the Parliament and Commission on the other hand; calls for ways to convert this tension in a more productive exchange of opinions; hopes that the openness to new attitudes and proposals will ultimately lead to structural changes that reflect the ambitions and concerns of both the Parliament and the Council;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that Parliament has, from the outset, placed a particular focus on migration and refugees in the 2016 budget;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 60 a (new) 60a. Fully compensates these reinforcements by reducing the appropriations in the budget lines for contingency reserve, the general Members' allowance, further training, fitting out of premises, energy consumption, computing and telecommunications - investment in projects and furniture;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 62 Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 63 Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 63 63. Fully compensates these reinforcements by reducing the appropriations in the budget lines for contingency reserve, the general Members' allowance, further training, fitting out of premises, energy consumption, computing and telecommunications - investment in
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 63 a (new) 63a. Believes that the increase of EUR 10 026 500 for expenditure relating to parliamentary assistance is not appropriate;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 66 a (new) 66a. Requests an assessment on the results of the voluntary approach chosen by the Joint Working Group to limit business class flights by Members and staff;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 66 b (new) 66b. Urges the Secretary General of the European Parliament to present in the run-up to the negotiations on the 2017 budget a comprehensive plan as to how to make further savings, or to generate revenue, in areas including, but not limited to, the car parks, car fleet, energy consumption, and business class flights;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 67 a (new) 67a. Believes that in the medium term the Members' Statute should be revised in order to agree on sensible savings;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 67 b (new) 67b. Stresses that Parliament and the Council must address the need for a roadmap to a single seat, as requested by a large majority in this Parliament in several resolutions, in order to create long term savings in the Union budget;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 67 c (new) 67c. Stresses that Parliament and the Council must address the need for a roadmap to a single seat, as requested by the large majority of this Parliament in several resolutions, in order to create long term savings in the Union budget;
source: 569.636
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/19 |
Old
New
|
committees/20 |
Old
New
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFCO-AD-557335_EN.html
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AD-560783_EN.html
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-564956_EN.html
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/13/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AD-564954_EN.html
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/15/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AD-560590_EN.html
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/16/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-564982_EN.html
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-PR-567773_EN.html
|
events/1/date |
Old
2015-09-04T00:00:00New
2015-09-03T00:00:00 |
events/10/date |
Old
2015-11-14T00:00:00New
2015-11-13T00:00:00 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE557.335&secondRef=02
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE560.783&secondRef=02
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE564.956&secondRef=02
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE560.817&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-560817_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE554.942&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-554942_EN.html |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE560.881&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-560881_EN.html |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE560.748&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AD-560748_EN.html |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE564.966&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-564966_EN.html |
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE560.823&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AD-560823_EN.html |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE560.918&secondRef=04New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AD-560918_EN.html |
docs/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE564.903&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-564903_EN.html |
docs/12/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE564.954&secondRef=02
|
docs/13/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE560.844&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-560844_EN.html |
docs/14/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE560.590&secondRef=02
|
docs/15/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE564.982&secondRef=02
|
docs/16/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE567.773
|
docs/19/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0407_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0407_EN.html |
events/2/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151027&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2015-10-27-TOC_EN.html |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/9/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0333_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0333_EN.html |
events/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151124&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2015-11-24-TOC_EN.html |
events/14/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Decision by Parliament |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/18 |
|
docs/19/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0407New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0407_EN.html |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0298&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0298_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0376New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0376_EN.html |
events/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0333&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0333_EN.html |
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/19 |
|
committees/19 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
BUDE/8/04900;BUDG/8/03789New
|
procedure/final/title |
Old
OJ L 048 24.02.2016, p. 0001New
OJ L 048 24.02.2016, p. 0001 |
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2016:048:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2016:048:TOC |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting signature of actNew
Procedure completed |
activities/14 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
BUDG/8/03789New
BUDE/8/04900;BUDG/8/03789 |
activities/6/docs/0 |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
BUDE/8/04900;BUDG/8/03789New
BUDG/8/03789 |
activities/11 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council decision on budgetary joint textNew
Awaiting signature of act |
activities/11/date |
Old
2015-11-25T00:00:00New
2015-11-24T00:00:00 |
activities/11/docs |
|
activities/11/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/12/date |
Old
2015-11-24T00:00:00New
2015-11-25T00:00:00 |
activities/12/type |
Old
Debate scheduledNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament decision on budgetary joint textNew
Awaiting Council decision on budgetary joint text |
activities/11/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate scheduled |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting announcement of budgetary joint textNew
Awaiting Parliament decision on budgetary joint text |
activities/10/docs/0/text |
|
activities/12 |
|
activities/11 |
|
activities/9 |
|
activities/10 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Budgetary conciliation committee convenedNew
Awaiting announcement of budgetary joint text |
activities/8 |
|
activities/6/docs/0/text |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52015DC0300:EN
|
activities/2/committees/3/shadows |
|
activities/3/committees/3/shadows |
|
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/6/docs |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Vote scheduledNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/7 |
|
committees/3/shadows |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
BUDG/8/03789New
BUDE/8/04900;BUDG/8/03789 |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Budgetary conciliation committee convened |
activities/5 |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Vote scheduled |
activities/5 |
|
procedure/subtype |
Old
Budgetary preparationNew
Budget |
activities/1/docs/0/url |
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=11706%2F15&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC
|
activities/2/committees/3/shadows/5 |
|
activities/3/committees/3/shadows/5 |
|
activities/4/docs/0/text |
|
committees/3/shadows/5 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in plenary scheduled |
committees/3/shadows |
|
committees/13/date |
2015-04-02T00:00:00
|
committees/13/rapporteur |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
BUDG/8/03789
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/1/date |
Old
2015-11-25T00:00:00New
2015-10-28T00:00:00 |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|