BETA


2007/2201(INI) Competition: sector inquiry on retail banking

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ECON PITTELLA Gianni (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion ITRE
Committee Opinion IMCO
Committee Opinion JURI
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2008/07/25
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2008/07/16
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2008/06/05
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2008/06/05
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 562 votes to 16, with 10 abstentions, a resolution in response to the final report on the inquiry on retail banking launched by the European Commission in June 2005.

The own initiative report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Gianni PITELLA (PES, IT) on behalf of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs.

MEPs support the integrated approach of the Commission, which comprises supporting internal market policies with well-targeted sector inquiries. However, they regret that the sector inquiry does not take sufficient account of the specificities of the strictly regulated banking sector and the importance of culture, habits and languages in consumer choices and protection for financial products.

Furthermore, MEPs point out that a highly fragmented regulatory framework is an impediment to the development of the cross-border supply of banking services. They support, therefore, the Commission initiative to reopen its assessment of Directive 2002/65/EC concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services, which must also involve a review of the directives on electronic commerce and electronic signatures, in order to enable these to achieve their stated aims effectively.

Consumer mobility : the Commission is called upon to promote consumer mobility and to monitor Member States' progress in allowing consumers to change provider more easily. According to MEPs, the simplification of financial service regulations and the dismantling of barriers to consumer mobility should not lead to lower standards of consumer protection in the Member States.

The resolution recommends permitting only fully justified charges for closing accounts, if any. Furthermore, switching current accounts should cause no harm to consumers. The banking industry is called upon to develop best practices on swift and efficient procedures for account switching. MEPs also consider that access to basic financial services, such as opening a bank account, is a right. They call on the Commission to identify the obstacles to the exercise of that right and the best practices followed in the retail financial sector in that respect.

Information and transparency : emphasising that information for consumers is fundamental for ensuring competition among banks, MEPs request information that is of a better quality, more readable and hence accessible to consumers. The Commission is called upon to ensure that the industry provides consumers, before they open an account, with a succinct compilation detailing all costs, including closing costs, if any, in way that is comparable across the European Union. The Commission should also put forward legislative proposals in that respect in the event that the industry fails to respect its commitment.

The resolution also recommends the creation of a single European standard for providing information to the costumer by the supplier on their basic products, related costs and conditions.

Consumer education : MEPs call for the development of financial education programmes aimed at increasing the awareness of consumers as regards their money-management options. They recall the importance of developing financial education, especially in the field of retail banking (for instance as regards loans, mortgages, diversified and safe saving and investment). Member States are called upon to take measures to raise financial literacy among citizens and to consider setting up an institution of independent national ombudsmen responsible for financial services.

Credits - registers and intermediaries : the resolution stresses the importance of reliable credit and fraud data for banks and other credit providers, accessible on a fair and transparent basis.

The Commission is called upon to: (i) identify obstacles to data sharing and to make proposals for the interoperability of data registers while respecting consumers' private lives and their rights of access and rectification; (ii) intensify its work on credit intermediaries (agents or brokers) in order to ensure consumer protection and avoid opaque practices; (iii) clarify and harmonise the responsibilities and liabilities of credit intermediaries following the principle 'same business, same risks, same rules'.

Cooperation between banks : MEPs welcome the Commission's further examination of the cooperation between banks in order to assess where such cooperation could result in economic and consumer benefits and whether it could lead to a restriction of competition. They also emphasise that savings and cooperative banks, as well as other credit institutions, contribute substantially to the financing of the local economy and the development of the endogenous potential of regions and facilitate access to financial services for all consumers.

Payment systems : MEPs are confident that the SEPA (Single European Payment Area) and the Payment Services Directive should provide solutions for the fragmentation and lack of competition identified by the sector inquiry concerning payment infrastructures. They call on the Commission to investigate whether the transposition of the Payment Services Directive is reducing the number of providers of payment settlement services and to take immediate steps if major providers develop a monopoly position that might reduce competition.

The resolution also highlights the need for better clarification concerning the methodology and rules for the management of multilaterally agreed interchange fees for card payments and for the mechanism to calculate interbanking fees for automated teller machines and non-card payments.

Documents
2008/06/05
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2008/06/04
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2008/05/15
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2008/05/15
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2008/05/06
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the own initiative report by Gianni PITELLA (PES, IT), in response to the final report on the inquiry on retail banking launched by the European Commission in June 2005.

MEPs support the integrated approach of the Commission, which comprises supporting internal market policies with well-targeted sector inquiries. However, they regret that the sector inquiry does not take sufficient account of the specificities of the strictly regulated banking sector and the importance of culture, habits and languages in consumer choices and protection for financial products.

The report recalls that competition policy is a powerful tool for completing the internal market but that aiming for more competition should neither lead to weakened risk management in the banking sector nor endanger the stability of the sector. MEPs also point out that a highly fragmented regulatory framework is an impediment to the development of the cross-border supply of banking services. They support, therefore, the Commission initiative to reopen consideration of Directive 2002/65/EC concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services, which must also involve the review of the directives on electronic commerce and electronic signatures, in order to enable these effectively to achieve their stated aims.

Consumer mobility : the Commission is called upon to work towards facilitating consumer mobility and to monitor Member States' progress in allowing consumers more easily to change provider. According to MEPs, the simplification of financial service regulations and the dismantling of barriers to consumer mobility should not lead to lower standards of consumer protection in the Member States.

The report recommends permitting only fully justified charges for closing accounts, if any. The banking industry is called upon to develop best practices on swift and efficient procedures for account switching. MEPs also consider that access to basic financial services, such as opening a bank account, is a right. They call on the Commission to identify the obstacles to the exercise of that right and the best practices followed in the retail financial sector in that respect.

Information and transparency : emphasising that information for consumers is fundamental for ensuring competition among banks, MEPs request information that is of a better quality, more readable and hence accessible to consumers. The Commission is called upon to work towards ensuring that the industry, as a supplement to existing national provisions, provides consumers, before they open an account, with a succinct compilation detailing all costs, including closing costs, if any, in way that is comparable across the European Union. The Commission should also put forward legislative proposals in that respect in the event that the industry fails to respect its commitment.

The report also recommends the creation of a single European standard for providing information to the costumer by the supplier on their basic products, related costs and conditions.

Consumer education : MEPs call for the development of financial education programmes aimed at increasing the awareness of consumers as regards their money-management options. They recall the importance of developing financial education, especially in the field of retail banking (for instance as regards loans, mortgages, diversified and safe saving and investment). Member States are called upon to take and coordinate measures to raise financial literacy among citizens and to consider setting up an institution of independent national ombudsmen responsible for financial services.

Credits - registers and intermediaries : the report stresses the importance of reliable credit and fraud data for banks and other credit providers, accessible on a fair and transparent basis.

The Commission is called upon to: (i) identify obstacles to data sharing and to make proposals for the interoperability of data registers while respecting consumers' private lives and their rights of access and rectification; (ii) intensify its work on credit intermediaries (agents or brokers) in order to ensure consumer protection and avoid opaque practices; (iii) clarify and harmonise the responsibilities and liabilities of credit intermediaries following the principle 'same business, same risks, same rules'.

Cooperation between banks : MEPs welcome the Commission's further examination of the cooperation between banks in order to assess where such cooperation could result in economic and consumer benefits and whether it could lead to a restriction of competition. They also emphasise that savings and cooperative banks, as well as other credit institutions, contribute substantially to the financing of the local economy and the development of the endogenous potential of regions and facilitate access to financial services for all consumers.

Payment systems : MEPs are confident that the SEPA (Single European Payment Area) and the Payment Services Directive should provide solutions for the fragmentation and lack of competition identified by the sector inquiry concerning payment infrastructures.

The report also highlights the need for better clarification concerning the methodology and rules for the management of multilaterally agreed interchange fees for card payments and for the mechanism to calculate interbanking fees for automated teller machines and non-card payments.

Lastly, MEPs urge the Commission to: (i) establish and communicate to all stakeholders the criteria for the definition by market operators of the methodology to be used to calculate all multilaterally agreed interchange fees; and (ii) achieve greater transparency of the industry by communicating to the consumers the characteristics of payment products and services and their rights and obligations as users.

2008/03/26
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2008/02/06
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2007/10/09
   CSL - Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council
2007/10/09
   CSL - Council Meeting
2007/09/27
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2007/02/13
   EP - PITTELLA Gianni (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in ECON
2007/01/31
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2007/01/31
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

PURPOSE: to present the Commission’s final report on the competition inquiry (Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003) on retail banking.

CONTENT: on the basis of Article 17 of Regulation 1/2003/EC (see CNS/2000/0243 ) on retail banking, the Commission initiated an inquiry into retail banking on 13 June 2005. According to this provision the Commission may decide to conduct an inquiry into a particular sector of the economy or into particular types of agreements across various sectors, where the trend of trade between Member States, the rigidity of prices or other circumstances suggest that competition may be restricted or distorted within the common market. This document is the final report of the retail banking inquiry.

The sector inquiry has identified a number of symptoms suggesting that competition may not function properly in certain areas of retail banking The inquiry has confirmed that markets remain fragmented along national lines, including in retail banking infrastructures such as payment systems and credit registers.

This sector inquiry identified four key issues that will need to be followed up by the Commission and national competition authorities:

the design and operation of payment systems, including card payment systems : the European payment cards industry provides the means for a significant part of sales in Europe. Total sales volumes with card transactions in the EU in 2005 were more than EUR 1350 billion. The sector inquiry has identified several significant competition issues in the European payment cards market that confirm the need for strong competition law enforcement in close cooperation with national competition authorities; credit registers : open and affordable access to good quality credit data is an important prerequisite for banks wishing to provide core retail banking products such as mortgages, consumer loans and credit cards. However, widespread credit data are not available in several Member States, whether because of regulation or the limited development of credit data markets; cooperation between banks : retail banks co-operate in a variety of areas such as the setting of standards and infrastructures or the operation of payment systems. Savings and cooperative banks traditionally have even closer co-operative ties. Co-operation between banks can result in economic and consumer benefits. It usually does so where the banks involved are SMEs and jointly do not possess a significant market share. Where independent banks with a significant combined market position enter into cooperation with the object or effect of limiting competition among themselves or excluding new entrants, however, effective competition can be impeded; the setting of banks' prices and policies, including product tying : prices for retail banking products vary substantially across Member States. However, the inquiry has found that at national level there is evidence of convergent behaviour in pricing and policies for core retail banking products. In current accounts such convergent behaviour can be seen in relation to the setting of several parameters including account management fees, closing charges, ATM fees and default charges. Product tying is an additional aspect where banks in the majority of Member States demonstrate convergent behaviour. Tying can weaken retail banking competition by raising switching costs, reducing price transparency and discouraging the entry of new players (especially mono-line suppliers).

The European Commission will not hesitate to exercise its powers of enforcement under Articles 81, 82 and 86 EC, to ensure that the competition rules are respected in retail banking; and with respect to the various payment markets and the SEPA (Single European Payment Area) project in particular. The European Commission will also continue its efforts in fields other than competition law to further increase the benefits of the internal market in retail banking to its citizens.

2007/01/30
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

On the basis of Article 17 of Regulation 1/2003/EC on retail banking, the Commission initiated an inquiry into retail banking. According to this provision the Commission may decide to conduct an inquiry into a particular sector of the economy or into particular types of agreements across various sectors, where the trend of trade between Member States, the rigidity of prices or other circumstances suggest that competition may be restricted or distorted within the common market. This document is the final report of the retail banking inquiry.

The sector inquiry has identified a number of symptoms suggesting that competition may not function properly in certain areas of retail banking The inquiry has confirmed that markets remain fragmented along national lines, including in retail banking infrastructures such as payment systems and credit registers.

This sector inquiry identified four key issues that will need to be followed up by the Commission and national competition authorities:

• the design and operation of payment systems, including card payment systems: the European payment cards industry provides the means for a significant part of sales in Europe. Total sales volumes with card transactions in the EU in 2005 were more than EUR 1350 billion. The sector inquiry has identified several significant competition issues in the European payment cards market that confirm the need for strong competition law enforcement in close cooperation with national competition authorities;

• credit registers: open and affordable access to good quality credit data is an important prerequisite for banks wishing to provide core retail banking products such as mortgages, consumer loans and credit cards. However, widespread credit data are not available in several Member States, whether because of regulation or the limited development of credit data markets;

• cooperation between banks: retail banks co-operate in a variety of areas such as the setting of standards and infrastructures or the operation of payment systems. Savings and cooperative banks traditionally have even closer co-operative ties. Co-operation between banks can result in economic and consumer benefits. It usually does so where the banks involved are SMEs and jointly do not possess a significant market share. Where independent banks with a significant combined market position enter into cooperation with the object or effect of limiting competition among themselves or excluding new entrants, however, effective competition can be impeded;

• the setting of banks' prices and policies, including product tying: prices for retail banking products vary substantially across Member States. However, the inquiry has found that at national level there is evidence of convergent behaviour in pricing and policies for core retail banking products. In current accounts such convergent behaviour can be seen in relation to the setting of several parameters including account management fees, closing charges, ATM fees and default charges. Product tying is an additional aspect where banks in the majority of Member States demonstrate convergent behaviour. Tying can weaken retail banking competition by raising switching costs, reducing price transparency and discouraging the entry of new players (especially mono-line suppliers).

The European Commission will not hesitate to exercise its powers of enforcement under Articles 81, 82 and 86 EC, to ensure that the competition rules are respected in retail banking; and with respect to the various payment markets and the SEPA (Single European Payment Area) project in particular. The European Commission will also continue its efforts in fields other than competition law to further increase the benefits of the internal market in retail banking to its citizens.

Documents

Activities

Votes

Rapport Pitella A6-0185/2008 - résolution #

2008/06/05 Outcome: +: 562, -: 16, 0: 10
DE IT FR PL GB ES RO NL CZ HU BE PT AT BG SE EL FI LT SK LV IE DK SI CY EE LU MT
Total
71
52
59
43
56
40
24
23
21
20
22
20
15
14
17
17
11
10
10
9
8
7
6
5
3
3
2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
227

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
157

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1

Finland PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

For (1)

1

Denmark PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
77

Hungary ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
35

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
28

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Spain Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
31

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
10

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
23

Italy NI

Against (1)

3

Poland NI

1

Czechia NI

1

Belgium NI

3

Austria NI

1
AmendmentsDossier
86 2007/2201(INI)
2008/03/26 ECON 86 amendments...
source: PE-402.858

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/5/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15024&j=0&l=en
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15024&j=0&l=en
New
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15024&j=1&l=en
events/0/date
Old
2007-01-31T00:00:00
New
2007-01-30T00:00:00
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.585
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE400.585
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE402.858
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE402.858
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0185_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0185_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15024&j=1&l=en
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/3/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/4
date
2008-05-15T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0185_EN.html title: A6-0185/2008
events/4
date
2008-05-15T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0185_EN.html title: A6-0185/2008
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080604&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20080604&type=CRE
events/7
date
2008-06-05T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0260_EN.html title: T6-0260/2008
summary
events/7
date
2008-06-05T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0260_EN.html title: T6-0260/2008
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
rapporteur
name: PITTELLA Gianni date: 2007-02-13T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2007-02-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PITTELLA Gianni group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-185&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0185_EN.html
docs/5/body
EC
docs/6/body
EC
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-185&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0185_EN.html
events/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-260
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0260_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2007-01-31T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0033/COM_COM(2007)0033_EN.pdf title: COM(2007)0033 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52007DC0033:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/competition/ title: Competition Commissioner: KROES Neelie type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2007-09-27T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2007-02-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: PITTELLA Gianni body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2822
  • date: 2008-05-06T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2007-02-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: PITTELLA Gianni body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-05-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-185&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0185/2008 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2008-06-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080604&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-06-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=15024&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-260 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0260/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Competition commissioner: KROES Neelie
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2007-02-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PITTELLA Gianni group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
ECON
date
2007-02-13T00:00:00
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
rapporteur
group: PSE name: PITTELLA Gianni
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2822 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2822*&MEET_DATE=09/10/2007 date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2007-01-31T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0106/COM_SEC(2007)0106_EN.pdf title: SEC(2007)0106 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2007&nu_doc=106 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2007-01-31T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0033/COM_COM(2007)0033_EN.pdf title: COM(2007)0033 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2007&nu_doc=33 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to present the Commission’s final report on the competition inquiry (Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003) on retail banking. CONTENT: on the basis of Article 17 of Regulation 1/2003/EC (see CNS/2000/0243 ) on retail banking, the Commission initiated an inquiry into retail banking on 13 June 2005. According to this provision the Commission may decide to conduct an inquiry into a particular sector of the economy or into particular types of agreements across various sectors, where the trend of trade between Member States, the rigidity of prices or other circumstances suggest that competition may be restricted or distorted within the common market. This document is the final report of the retail banking inquiry. The sector inquiry has identified a number of symptoms suggesting that competition may not function properly in certain areas of retail banking The inquiry has confirmed that markets remain fragmented along national lines, including in retail banking infrastructures such as payment systems and credit registers. This sector inquiry identified four key issues that will need to be followed up by the Commission and national competition authorities: the design and operation of payment systems, including card payment systems : the European payment cards industry provides the means for a significant part of sales in Europe. Total sales volumes with card transactions in the EU in 2005 were more than EUR 1350 billion. The sector inquiry has identified several significant competition issues in the European payment cards market that confirm the need for strong competition law enforcement in close cooperation with national competition authorities; credit registers : open and affordable access to good quality credit data is an important prerequisite for banks wishing to provide core retail banking products such as mortgages, consumer loans and credit cards. However, widespread credit data are not available in several Member States, whether because of regulation or the limited development of credit data markets; cooperation between banks : retail banks co-operate in a variety of areas such as the setting of standards and infrastructures or the operation of payment systems. Savings and cooperative banks traditionally have even closer co-operative ties. Co-operation between banks can result in economic and consumer benefits. It usually does so where the banks involved are SMEs and jointly do not possess a significant market share. Where independent banks with a significant combined market position enter into cooperation with the object or effect of limiting competition among themselves or excluding new entrants, however, effective competition can be impeded; the setting of banks' prices and policies, including product tying : prices for retail banking products vary substantially across Member States. However, the inquiry has found that at national level there is evidence of convergent behaviour in pricing and policies for core retail banking products. In current accounts such convergent behaviour can be seen in relation to the setting of several parameters including account management fees, closing charges, ATM fees and default charges. Product tying is an additional aspect where banks in the majority of Member States demonstrate convergent behaviour. Tying can weaken retail banking competition by raising switching costs, reducing price transparency and discouraging the entry of new players (especially mono-line suppliers). The European Commission will not hesitate to exercise its powers of enforcement under Articles 81, 82 and 86 EC, to ensure that the competition rules are respected in retail banking; and with respect to the various payment markets and the SEPA (Single European Payment Area) project in particular. The European Commission will also continue its efforts in fields other than competition law to further increase the benefits of the internal market in retail banking to its citizens. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2008-02-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.585 title: PE400.585 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2008-03-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE402.858 title: PE402.858 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2008-05-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-185&language=EN title: A6-0185/2008 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2008-07-16T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=15024&j=1&l=en title: SP(2008)4439 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2008-07-25T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=15024&j=0&l=en title: SP(2008)4438 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2007-01-31T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0033/COM_COM(2007)0033_EN.pdf title: COM(2007)0033 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2007&nu_doc=33 title: EUR-Lex summary: On the basis of Article 17 of Regulation 1/2003/EC on retail banking, the Commission initiated an inquiry into retail banking. According to this provision the Commission may decide to conduct an inquiry into a particular sector of the economy or into particular types of agreements across various sectors, where the trend of trade between Member States, the rigidity of prices or other circumstances suggest that competition may be restricted or distorted within the common market. This document is the final report of the retail banking inquiry. The sector inquiry has identified a number of symptoms suggesting that competition may not function properly in certain areas of retail banking The inquiry has confirmed that markets remain fragmented along national lines, including in retail banking infrastructures such as payment systems and credit registers. This sector inquiry identified four key issues that will need to be followed up by the Commission and national competition authorities: • the design and operation of payment systems, including card payment systems: the European payment cards industry provides the means for a significant part of sales in Europe. Total sales volumes with card transactions in the EU in 2005 were more than EUR 1350 billion. The sector inquiry has identified several significant competition issues in the European payment cards market that confirm the need for strong competition law enforcement in close cooperation with national competition authorities; • credit registers: open and affordable access to good quality credit data is an important prerequisite for banks wishing to provide core retail banking products such as mortgages, consumer loans and credit cards. However, widespread credit data are not available in several Member States, whether because of regulation or the limited development of credit data markets; • cooperation between banks: retail banks co-operate in a variety of areas such as the setting of standards and infrastructures or the operation of payment systems. Savings and cooperative banks traditionally have even closer co-operative ties. Co-operation between banks can result in economic and consumer benefits. It usually does so where the banks involved are SMEs and jointly do not possess a significant market share. Where independent banks with a significant combined market position enter into cooperation with the object or effect of limiting competition among themselves or excluding new entrants, however, effective competition can be impeded; • the setting of banks' prices and policies, including product tying: prices for retail banking products vary substantially across Member States. However, the inquiry has found that at national level there is evidence of convergent behaviour in pricing and policies for core retail banking products. In current accounts such convergent behaviour can be seen in relation to the setting of several parameters including account management fees, closing charges, ATM fees and default charges. Product tying is an additional aspect where banks in the majority of Member States demonstrate convergent behaviour. Tying can weaken retail banking competition by raising switching costs, reducing price transparency and discouraging the entry of new players (especially mono-line suppliers). The European Commission will not hesitate to exercise its powers of enforcement under Articles 81, 82 and 86 EC, to ensure that the competition rules are respected in retail banking; and with respect to the various payment markets and the SEPA (Single European Payment Area) project in particular. The European Commission will also continue its efforts in fields other than competition law to further increase the benefits of the internal market in retail banking to its citizens.
  • date: 2007-09-27T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 type: Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council body: CSL
  • date: 2008-05-06T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the own initiative report by Gianni PITELLA (PES, IT), in response to the final report on the inquiry on retail banking launched by the European Commission in June 2005. MEPs support the integrated approach of the Commission, which comprises supporting internal market policies with well-targeted sector inquiries. However, they regret that the sector inquiry does not take sufficient account of the specificities of the strictly regulated banking sector and the importance of culture, habits and languages in consumer choices and protection for financial products. The report recalls that competition policy is a powerful tool for completing the internal market but that aiming for more competition should neither lead to weakened risk management in the banking sector nor endanger the stability of the sector. MEPs also point out that a highly fragmented regulatory framework is an impediment to the development of the cross-border supply of banking services. They support, therefore, the Commission initiative to reopen consideration of Directive 2002/65/EC concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services, which must also involve the review of the directives on electronic commerce and electronic signatures, in order to enable these effectively to achieve their stated aims. Consumer mobility : the Commission is called upon to work towards facilitating consumer mobility and to monitor Member States' progress in allowing consumers more easily to change provider. According to MEPs, the simplification of financial service regulations and the dismantling of barriers to consumer mobility should not lead to lower standards of consumer protection in the Member States. The report recommends permitting only fully justified charges for closing accounts, if any. The banking industry is called upon to develop best practices on swift and efficient procedures for account switching. MEPs also consider that access to basic financial services, such as opening a bank account, is a right. They call on the Commission to identify the obstacles to the exercise of that right and the best practices followed in the retail financial sector in that respect. Information and transparency : emphasising that information for consumers is fundamental for ensuring competition among banks, MEPs request information that is of a better quality, more readable and hence accessible to consumers. The Commission is called upon to work towards ensuring that the industry, as a supplement to existing national provisions, provides consumers, before they open an account, with a succinct compilation detailing all costs, including closing costs, if any, in way that is comparable across the European Union. The Commission should also put forward legislative proposals in that respect in the event that the industry fails to respect its commitment. The report also recommends the creation of a single European standard for providing information to the costumer by the supplier on their basic products, related costs and conditions. Consumer education : MEPs call for the development of financial education programmes aimed at increasing the awareness of consumers as regards their money-management options. They recall the importance of developing financial education, especially in the field of retail banking (for instance as regards loans, mortgages, diversified and safe saving and investment). Member States are called upon to take and coordinate measures to raise financial literacy among citizens and to consider setting up an institution of independent national ombudsmen responsible for financial services. Credits - registers and intermediaries : the report stresses the importance of reliable credit and fraud data for banks and other credit providers, accessible on a fair and transparent basis. The Commission is called upon to: (i) identify obstacles to data sharing and to make proposals for the interoperability of data registers while respecting consumers' private lives and their rights of access and rectification; (ii) intensify its work on credit intermediaries (agents or brokers) in order to ensure consumer protection and avoid opaque practices; (iii) clarify and harmonise the responsibilities and liabilities of credit intermediaries following the principle 'same business, same risks, same rules'. Cooperation between banks : MEPs welcome the Commission's further examination of the cooperation between banks in order to assess where such cooperation could result in economic and consumer benefits and whether it could lead to a restriction of competition. They also emphasise that savings and cooperative banks, as well as other credit institutions, contribute substantially to the financing of the local economy and the development of the endogenous potential of regions and facilitate access to financial services for all consumers. Payment systems : MEPs are confident that the SEPA (Single European Payment Area) and the Payment Services Directive should provide solutions for the fragmentation and lack of competition identified by the sector inquiry concerning payment infrastructures. The report also highlights the need for better clarification concerning the methodology and rules for the management of multilaterally agreed interchange fees for card payments and for the mechanism to calculate interbanking fees for automated teller machines and non-card payments. Lastly, MEPs urge the Commission to: (i) establish and communicate to all stakeholders the criteria for the definition by market operators of the methodology to be used to calculate all multilaterally agreed interchange fees; and (ii) achieve greater transparency of the industry by communicating to the consumers the characteristics of payment products and services and their rights and obligations as users.
  • date: 2008-05-15T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-185&language=EN title: A6-0185/2008
  • date: 2008-06-04T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080604&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-06-05T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=15024&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2008-06-05T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-260 title: T6-0260/2008 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 562 votes to 16, with 10 abstentions, a resolution in response to the final report on the inquiry on retail banking launched by the European Commission in June 2005. The own initiative report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Gianni PITELLA (PES, IT) on behalf of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs. MEPs support the integrated approach of the Commission, which comprises supporting internal market policies with well-targeted sector inquiries. However, they regret that the sector inquiry does not take sufficient account of the specificities of the strictly regulated banking sector and the importance of culture, habits and languages in consumer choices and protection for financial products. Furthermore, MEPs point out that a highly fragmented regulatory framework is an impediment to the development of the cross-border supply of banking services. They support, therefore, the Commission initiative to reopen its assessment of Directive 2002/65/EC concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services, which must also involve a review of the directives on electronic commerce and electronic signatures, in order to enable these to achieve their stated aims effectively. Consumer mobility : the Commission is called upon to promote consumer mobility and to monitor Member States' progress in allowing consumers to change provider more easily. According to MEPs, the simplification of financial service regulations and the dismantling of barriers to consumer mobility should not lead to lower standards of consumer protection in the Member States. The resolution recommends permitting only fully justified charges for closing accounts, if any. Furthermore, switching current accounts should cause no harm to consumers. The banking industry is called upon to develop best practices on swift and efficient procedures for account switching. MEPs also consider that access to basic financial services, such as opening a bank account, is a right. They call on the Commission to identify the obstacles to the exercise of that right and the best practices followed in the retail financial sector in that respect. Information and transparency : emphasising that information for consumers is fundamental for ensuring competition among banks, MEPs request information that is of a better quality, more readable and hence accessible to consumers. The Commission is called upon to ensure that the industry provides consumers, before they open an account, with a succinct compilation detailing all costs, including closing costs, if any, in way that is comparable across the European Union. The Commission should also put forward legislative proposals in that respect in the event that the industry fails to respect its commitment. The resolution also recommends the creation of a single European standard for providing information to the costumer by the supplier on their basic products, related costs and conditions. Consumer education : MEPs call for the development of financial education programmes aimed at increasing the awareness of consumers as regards their money-management options. They recall the importance of developing financial education, especially in the field of retail banking (for instance as regards loans, mortgages, diversified and safe saving and investment). Member States are called upon to take measures to raise financial literacy among citizens and to consider setting up an institution of independent national ombudsmen responsible for financial services. Credits - registers and intermediaries : the resolution stresses the importance of reliable credit and fraud data for banks and other credit providers, accessible on a fair and transparent basis. The Commission is called upon to: (i) identify obstacles to data sharing and to make proposals for the interoperability of data registers while respecting consumers' private lives and their rights of access and rectification; (ii) intensify its work on credit intermediaries (agents or brokers) in order to ensure consumer protection and avoid opaque practices; (iii) clarify and harmonise the responsibilities and liabilities of credit intermediaries following the principle 'same business, same risks, same rules'. Cooperation between banks : MEPs welcome the Commission's further examination of the cooperation between banks in order to assess where such cooperation could result in economic and consumer benefits and whether it could lead to a restriction of competition. They also emphasise that savings and cooperative banks, as well as other credit institutions, contribute substantially to the financing of the local economy and the development of the endogenous potential of regions and facilitate access to financial services for all consumers. Payment systems : MEPs are confident that the SEPA (Single European Payment Area) and the Payment Services Directive should provide solutions for the fragmentation and lack of competition identified by the sector inquiry concerning payment infrastructures. They call on the Commission to investigate whether the transposition of the Payment Services Directive is reducing the number of providers of payment settlement services and to take immediate steps if major providers develop a monopoly position that might reduce competition. The resolution also highlights the need for better clarification concerning the methodology and rules for the management of multilaterally agreed interchange fees for card payments and for the mechanism to calculate interbanking fees for automated teller machines and non-card payments.
  • date: 2008-06-05T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/competition/ title: Competition commissioner: KROES Neelie
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ECON/6/51315
New
  • ECON/6/51315
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 2.50.04 Banks and credit
  • 2.60 Competition
  • 2.60.01 Trade restrictions, concerted practices, dominant positions
New
2.50.04
Banks and credit
2.60
Competition
2.60.01
Trade restrictions, concerted practices, dominant positions
procedure/title
Old
Competition: Sector inquiry on retail banking
New
Competition: sector inquiry on retail banking
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0033/COM_COM(2007)0033_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0033/COM_COM(2007)0033_EN.pdf
activities
  • date: 2007-01-31T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0033/COM_COM(2007)0033_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52007DC0033:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2007)0033 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/competition/ title: Competition Commissioner: KROES Neelie
  • date: 2007-09-27T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2007-02-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: PITTELLA Gianni body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2822
  • date: 2008-05-06T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2007-02-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: PITTELLA Gianni body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-05-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-185&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0185/2008 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2008-06-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080604&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-06-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=15024&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-260 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0260/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2007-02-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: PITTELLA Gianni
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/competition/ title: Competition commissioner: KROES Neelie
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
ECON/6/51315
reference
2007/2201(INI)
title
Competition: Sector inquiry on retail banking
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject