Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | PITTELLA Gianni ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
Committee Opinion | JURI |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 562 votes to 16, with 10 abstentions, a resolution in response to the final report on the inquiry on retail banking launched by the European Commission in June 2005.
The own initiative report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Gianni PITELLA (PES, IT) on behalf of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs.
MEPs support the integrated approach of the Commission, which comprises supporting internal market policies with well-targeted sector inquiries. However, they regret that the sector inquiry does not take sufficient account of the specificities of the strictly regulated banking sector and the importance of culture, habits and languages in consumer choices and protection for financial products.
Furthermore, MEPs point out that a highly fragmented regulatory framework is an impediment to the development of the cross-border supply of banking services. They support, therefore, the Commission initiative to reopen its assessment of Directive 2002/65/EC concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services, which must also involve a review of the directives on electronic commerce and electronic signatures, in order to enable these to achieve their stated aims effectively.
Consumer mobility : the Commission is called upon to promote consumer mobility and to monitor Member States' progress in allowing consumers to change provider more easily. According to MEPs, the simplification of financial service regulations and the dismantling of barriers to consumer mobility should not lead to lower standards of consumer protection in the Member States.
The resolution recommends permitting only fully justified charges for closing accounts, if any. Furthermore, switching current accounts should cause no harm to consumers. The banking industry is called upon to develop best practices on swift and efficient procedures for account switching. MEPs also consider that access to basic financial services, such as opening a bank account, is a right. They call on the Commission to identify the obstacles to the exercise of that right and the best practices followed in the retail financial sector in that respect.
Information and transparency : emphasising that information for consumers is fundamental for ensuring competition among banks, MEPs request information that is of a better quality, more readable and hence accessible to consumers. The Commission is called upon to ensure that the industry provides consumers, before they open an account, with a succinct compilation detailing all costs, including closing costs, if any, in way that is comparable across the European Union. The Commission should also put forward legislative proposals in that respect in the event that the industry fails to respect its commitment.
The resolution also recommends the creation of a single European standard for providing information to the costumer by the supplier on their basic products, related costs and conditions.
Consumer education : MEPs call for the development of financial education programmes aimed at increasing the awareness of consumers as regards their money-management options. They recall the importance of developing financial education, especially in the field of retail banking (for instance as regards loans, mortgages, diversified and safe saving and investment). Member States are called upon to take measures to raise financial literacy among citizens and to consider setting up an institution of independent national ombudsmen responsible for financial services.
Credits - registers and intermediaries : the resolution stresses the importance of reliable credit and fraud data for banks and other credit providers, accessible on a fair and transparent basis.
The Commission is called upon to: (i) identify obstacles to data sharing and to make proposals for the interoperability of data registers while respecting consumers' private lives and their rights of access and rectification; (ii) intensify its work on credit intermediaries (agents or brokers) in order to ensure consumer protection and avoid opaque practices; (iii) clarify and harmonise the responsibilities and liabilities of credit intermediaries following the principle 'same business, same risks, same rules'.
Cooperation between banks : MEPs welcome the Commission's further examination of the cooperation between banks in order to assess where such cooperation could result in economic and consumer benefits and whether it could lead to a restriction of competition. They also emphasise that savings and cooperative banks, as well as other credit institutions, contribute substantially to the financing of the local economy and the development of the endogenous potential of regions and facilitate access to financial services for all consumers.
Payment systems : MEPs are confident that the SEPA (Single European Payment Area) and the Payment Services Directive should provide solutions for the fragmentation and lack of competition identified by the sector inquiry concerning payment infrastructures. They call on the Commission to investigate whether the transposition of the Payment Services Directive is reducing the number of providers of payment settlement services and to take immediate steps if major providers develop a monopoly position that might reduce competition.
The resolution also highlights the need for better clarification concerning the methodology and rules for the management of multilaterally agreed interchange fees for card payments and for the mechanism to calculate interbanking fees for automated teller machines and non-card payments.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the own initiative report by Gianni PITELLA (PES, IT), in response to the final report on the inquiry on retail banking launched by the European Commission in June 2005.
MEPs support the integrated approach of the Commission, which comprises supporting internal market policies with well-targeted sector inquiries. However, they regret that the sector inquiry does not take sufficient account of the specificities of the strictly regulated banking sector and the importance of culture, habits and languages in consumer choices and protection for financial products.
The report recalls that competition policy is a powerful tool for completing the internal market but that aiming for more competition should neither lead to weakened risk management in the banking sector nor endanger the stability of the sector. MEPs also point out that a highly fragmented regulatory framework is an impediment to the development of the cross-border supply of banking services. They support, therefore, the Commission initiative to reopen consideration of Directive 2002/65/EC concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services, which must also involve the review of the directives on electronic commerce and electronic signatures, in order to enable these effectively to achieve their stated aims.
Consumer mobility : the Commission is called upon to work towards facilitating consumer mobility and to monitor Member States' progress in allowing consumers more easily to change provider. According to MEPs, the simplification of financial service regulations and the dismantling of barriers to consumer mobility should not lead to lower standards of consumer protection in the Member States.
The report recommends permitting only fully justified charges for closing accounts, if any. The banking industry is called upon to develop best practices on swift and efficient procedures for account switching. MEPs also consider that access to basic financial services, such as opening a bank account, is a right. They call on the Commission to identify the obstacles to the exercise of that right and the best practices followed in the retail financial sector in that respect.
Information and transparency : emphasising that information for consumers is fundamental for ensuring competition among banks, MEPs request information that is of a better quality, more readable and hence accessible to consumers. The Commission is called upon to work towards ensuring that the industry, as a supplement to existing national provisions, provides consumers, before they open an account, with a succinct compilation detailing all costs, including closing costs, if any, in way that is comparable across the European Union. The Commission should also put forward legislative proposals in that respect in the event that the industry fails to respect its commitment.
The report also recommends the creation of a single European standard for providing information to the costumer by the supplier on their basic products, related costs and conditions.
Consumer education : MEPs call for the development of financial education programmes aimed at increasing the awareness of consumers as regards their money-management options. They recall the importance of developing financial education, especially in the field of retail banking (for instance as regards loans, mortgages, diversified and safe saving and investment). Member States are called upon to take and coordinate measures to raise financial literacy among citizens and to consider setting up an institution of independent national ombudsmen responsible for financial services.
Credits - registers and intermediaries : the report stresses the importance of reliable credit and fraud data for banks and other credit providers, accessible on a fair and transparent basis.
The Commission is called upon to: (i) identify obstacles to data sharing and to make proposals for the interoperability of data registers while respecting consumers' private lives and their rights of access and rectification; (ii) intensify its work on credit intermediaries (agents or brokers) in order to ensure consumer protection and avoid opaque practices; (iii) clarify and harmonise the responsibilities and liabilities of credit intermediaries following the principle 'same business, same risks, same rules'.
Cooperation between banks : MEPs welcome the Commission's further examination of the cooperation between banks in order to assess where such cooperation could result in economic and consumer benefits and whether it could lead to a restriction of competition. They also emphasise that savings and cooperative banks, as well as other credit institutions, contribute substantially to the financing of the local economy and the development of the endogenous potential of regions and facilitate access to financial services for all consumers.
Payment systems : MEPs are confident that the SEPA (Single European Payment Area) and the Payment Services Directive should provide solutions for the fragmentation and lack of competition identified by the sector inquiry concerning payment infrastructures.
The report also highlights the need for better clarification concerning the methodology and rules for the management of multilaterally agreed interchange fees for card payments and for the mechanism to calculate interbanking fees for automated teller machines and non-card payments.
Lastly, MEPs urge the Commission to: (i) establish and communicate to all stakeholders the criteria for the definition by market operators of the methodology to be used to calculate all multilaterally agreed interchange fees; and (ii) achieve greater transparency of the industry by communicating to the consumers the characteristics of payment products and services and their rights and obligations as users.
PURPOSE: to present the Commission’s final report on the competition inquiry (Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003) on retail banking.
CONTENT: on the basis of Article 17 of Regulation 1/2003/EC (see CNS/2000/0243 ) on retail banking, the Commission initiated an inquiry into retail banking on 13 June 2005. According to this provision the Commission may decide to conduct an inquiry into a particular sector of the economy or into particular types of agreements across various sectors, where the trend of trade between Member States, the rigidity of prices or other circumstances suggest that competition may be restricted or distorted within the common market. This document is the final report of the retail banking inquiry.
The sector inquiry has identified a number of symptoms suggesting that competition may not function properly in certain areas of retail banking The inquiry has confirmed that markets remain fragmented along national lines, including in retail banking infrastructures such as payment systems and credit registers.
This sector inquiry identified four key issues that will need to be followed up by the Commission and national competition authorities:
the design and operation of payment systems, including card payment systems : the European payment cards industry provides the means for a significant part of sales in Europe. Total sales volumes with card transactions in the EU in 2005 were more than EUR 1350 billion. The sector inquiry has identified several significant competition issues in the European payment cards market that confirm the need for strong competition law enforcement in close cooperation with national competition authorities; credit registers : open and affordable access to good quality credit data is an important prerequisite for banks wishing to provide core retail banking products such as mortgages, consumer loans and credit cards. However, widespread credit data are not available in several Member States, whether because of regulation or the limited development of credit data markets; cooperation between banks : retail banks co-operate in a variety of areas such as the setting of standards and infrastructures or the operation of payment systems. Savings and cooperative banks traditionally have even closer co-operative ties. Co-operation between banks can result in economic and consumer benefits. It usually does so where the banks involved are SMEs and jointly do not possess a significant market share. Where independent banks with a significant combined market position enter into cooperation with the object or effect of limiting competition among themselves or excluding new entrants, however, effective competition can be impeded; the setting of banks' prices and policies, including product tying : prices for retail banking products vary substantially across Member States. However, the inquiry has found that at national level there is evidence of convergent behaviour in pricing and policies for core retail banking products. In current accounts such convergent behaviour can be seen in relation to the setting of several parameters including account management fees, closing charges, ATM fees and default charges. Product tying is an additional aspect where banks in the majority of Member States demonstrate convergent behaviour. Tying can weaken retail banking competition by raising switching costs, reducing price transparency and discouraging the entry of new players (especially mono-line suppliers).
The European Commission will not hesitate to exercise its powers of enforcement under Articles 81, 82 and 86 EC, to ensure that the competition rules are respected in retail banking; and with respect to the various payment markets and the SEPA (Single European Payment Area) project in particular. The European Commission will also continue its efforts in fields other than competition law to further increase the benefits of the internal market in retail banking to its citizens.
On the basis of Article 17 of Regulation 1/2003/EC on retail banking, the Commission initiated an inquiry into retail banking. According to this provision the Commission may decide to conduct an inquiry into a particular sector of the economy or into particular types of agreements across various sectors, where the trend of trade between Member States, the rigidity of prices or other circumstances suggest that competition may be restricted or distorted within the common market. This document is the final report of the retail banking inquiry.
The sector inquiry has identified a number of symptoms suggesting that competition may not function properly in certain areas of retail banking The inquiry has confirmed that markets remain fragmented along national lines, including in retail banking infrastructures such as payment systems and credit registers.
This sector inquiry identified four key issues that will need to be followed up by the Commission and national competition authorities:
• the design and operation of payment systems, including card payment systems: the European payment cards industry provides the means for a significant part of sales in Europe. Total sales volumes with card transactions in the EU in 2005 were more than EUR 1350 billion. The sector inquiry has identified several significant competition issues in the European payment cards market that confirm the need for strong competition law enforcement in close cooperation with national competition authorities;
• credit registers: open and affordable access to good quality credit data is an important prerequisite for banks wishing to provide core retail banking products such as mortgages, consumer loans and credit cards. However, widespread credit data are not available in several Member States, whether because of regulation or the limited development of credit data markets;
• cooperation between banks: retail banks co-operate in a variety of areas such as the setting of standards and infrastructures or the operation of payment systems. Savings and cooperative banks traditionally have even closer co-operative ties. Co-operation between banks can result in economic and consumer benefits. It usually does so where the banks involved are SMEs and jointly do not possess a significant market share. Where independent banks with a significant combined market position enter into cooperation with the object or effect of limiting competition among themselves or excluding new entrants, however, effective competition can be impeded;
• the setting of banks' prices and policies, including product tying: prices for retail banking products vary substantially across Member States. However, the inquiry has found that at national level there is evidence of convergent behaviour in pricing and policies for core retail banking products. In current accounts such convergent behaviour can be seen in relation to the setting of several parameters including account management fees, closing charges, ATM fees and default charges. Product tying is an additional aspect where banks in the majority of Member States demonstrate convergent behaviour. Tying can weaken retail banking competition by raising switching costs, reducing price transparency and discouraging the entry of new players (especially mono-line suppliers).
The European Commission will not hesitate to exercise its powers of enforcement under Articles 81, 82 and 86 EC, to ensure that the competition rules are respected in retail banking; and with respect to the various payment markets and the SEPA (Single European Payment Area) project in particular. The European Commission will also continue its efforts in fields other than competition law to further increase the benefits of the internal market in retail banking to its citizens.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)4438
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)4439
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0260/2008
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0185/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0185/2008
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE402.858
- Committee draft report: PE400.585
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)0106
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2007)0033
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2007)0033
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)0106 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2007)0033 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE400.585
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE402.858
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0185/2008
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)4439
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)4438
Activities
- Gianni PITTELLA
- Manuel dos SANTOS
- Harald ETTL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Roberto FIORE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Wolf KLINZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zita PLEŠTINSKÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zuzana ROITHOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Katrin SAKS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Margarita STARKEVIČIŪTĖ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Rapport Pitella A6-0185/2008 - résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
86 |
2007/2201(INI)
2008/03/26
ECON
86 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 - having regard to the recent decision on Mastercard's intra-EEA multilateral interchanges fees (COMP 34/579 MasterCard),
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Regrets that the Commission inquiry does not take sufficient account of the
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Regrets that the Commission inquiry does not take sufficient account of the specificities of the strictly regulated banking sector and the importance of culture, habits and languages in consumer choices and protection for financial products;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that competition policy is a powerful tool for completing the internal market but that aiming for more competition should not lead to weakened
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that competition policy is a powerful tool for completing the internal market but that aiming for more competition should not lead to weaken
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Points out that a highly fragmented regulatory framework is an impediment to the development of the cross-border supply of banking services. Supports, therefore, the Commission initiative to reopen consideration of Directive 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services1, which must also involve the review of the directives on electronic commerce2 and electronic signatures3, in order to enable these effectively to achieve their stated aims;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Asks the Commission to publish sector inquiry data in full including separate indicators attributed to the activities of the specific financial institutions, thus facilitating effective peer pressure, which may lead to a reduction of costs for consumers;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Points out that socially- or member- oriented financial institutions make an indispensable contribution to a social Europe and to the stability of financial markets; takes the view that cooperation between individual savings and cooperative banks does not restrict competition, but that competition is fostered by the existence of publicly- owned and cooperative banking groups; takes the view that European competition policy must not directly or indirectly discriminate against the business model of the more socially-oriented financial institutions;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Requests the Commission to work on facilitating customers mobility in order for consumers to have the choice to change operator, thus reinforcing a healthy competition between operators; wants to see
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Requests the Commission to work on facilitating customers' mobility where proved to be necessary in order for consumers to have the choice to change operator, thus reinforcing healthy competition between operators; wants to see continuity of service to be
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. considering the essential role played by retail banks in passing on, as appropriate, monetary policy conditions to the market, particularly to SMEs and consumers,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Requests the Commission to work on facilitating customers' mobility in order for consumers to have the choice to change operator, thus reinforcing healthy competition between operators; wants to see, to the greatest extent possible, continuity of service to be ensured even when
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Requests the Commission to
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Urges that the simplification of financial service regulations and the dismantling of barriers to customer mobility should not lead to lower standards of consumer protection in the Member States;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recommends
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recommends low or non-existent closing costs in order to encourage mobility and competition;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recommends low or non-existent closing costs in order to encourage mobility and competition; invites the EU banking industry to develop and requests the Commission to
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recommends low or non-existent closing costs in order to encourage mobility and competition;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recommends low or non-existent closing costs in order to encourage mobility and competition; re
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Underlines that, as regards product- tying, a clear distinction must be made between product combination favourable to both customer and bank and common to all branches of the economy on the one hand side and practices resulting in unfair competition on the other;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission to carry out a study on access to basic financial services in the European Union and to develop best practice on improving the level of account provision and tackling the problem of people not having an account;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Is of the opinion that information to consumers is
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Is of the opinion that information to consumers is essential but not, per se, sufficient to ensure competition between banks; requests information that is better quality and more readable; is of the opinion that for the time being
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Is of the opinion that information to consumers is essential but not, per se, sufficient to ensure competition between banks; requests information that is better quality and more readable; is of the opinion that for the time being, it is
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Is of the opinion that information to consumers is essential but not, per se, sufficient to ensure competition between banks; requests information that is better quality
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Supports the efforts made by the Commission and the financial services industry to raise consumers’ level of knowledge about financial services products and run educational programmes in this area, as the information supplied by financial service product providers must also be understood and used by the customers;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Recognises that there is a tension between preventing information overload and providing consumers with sufficient information; favours information quality over quantity; calls on the Commission, therefore, to invite consumer organisations to define which information they deem to be necessary to enable consumers to make appropriate choices;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Requests the Commission to
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Requests the Commission to
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Requests the Commission to work on enforcing obligations for banks to provide consumers, before they open an account, with a s
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. considering the
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Requests the Commission to work on enforcing obligations for banks to provide consumers, before they open an account, with a
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Recommends the creation of a voluntary single European
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Recommends the creation of a single European
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Recommends the creation of a single
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Recommends the creation of a single European prospectus for providers to describe their basic products, related costs and conditions in order to allow an easy and transparent comparison
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Recommends the creation of a single European prospectus
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Recalls the importance of developing financial education as a complement to adequate consumer protection, especially in the field of retail banking (for instance loans, mortgages, diversified and safe saving and investment); calls on the Member States and the banking sector to take and coordinate measures to raise financial literacy among citizens, including children, young people, employees and retired people, with a view to educating and empowering consumers in order to enable them to seek better, cheaper and more appropriate products and services and to foster competition, quality and innovation within the banking industry; recalls that confident investors can provide additional liquidity to capital markets;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses the importance of reliable data for banks to grant credits, accessible on a fair and transparent basis; insists nevertheless on the necessity to protect consumers' personal data
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. considering th
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses the importance of reliable
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses the importance of reliable data for banks to grant credits, accessible on a fair and transparent basis; insists nevertheless on the necessity to protect consumers' personal data; requests the Commission to make proposals for the interoperability of data registers while respecting consumers' private lives and rights of access and rectification; calls for immediate and compulsory notification of borrowers regarding any cross-border credit data enquiries, to guarantee data protection as effectively as possible;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses the importance of reliable data
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Takes the view that the protection of customers’ personal data and consumers’ rights of access and rectification must be improved throughout Europe, before mutual access to credit registers and cross-border data sharing are made easier;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to intensify its work on credit
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Requests the Commission to clarify and harmonise the rights and liabilities of intermediaries following the principle 'same business, same risks, same rules', since problems often arise in the sale, administration and enforcement of financial services agreements; re
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. Whereas the diversity of legal models and business objectives of the financial entities in the retail banking sector (banks, savings banks, cooperatives, etc) is a fundamental asset to the European economy which enriches the sector, corresponds to the pluralist structure of the market and helps to increase competition in the internal market,
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Requests the Commission to clarify and harmonise the rights and liabilities of intermediaries, since problems often arise in the sale, administration and enforcement of financial services agreements; stresses the importance of differentiating between the types of intermediaries and avoiding a one-size-fits-all approach; requests the Commission to distinguish clearly between information which has to be clear, concise, readable and cost-free and the provision of advisory services;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Requests the Commission to clarify and harmonise the rights and liabilities of
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Requests the Commission to clarify and harmonise the rights and liabilities of intermediaries
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Requests the Commission to clarify
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Welcomes the Commission's further examination of the cooperation between banks in order to assess where it could lead to a restriction of competition; underlines, however, that cooperation between banks can result in economic and consumer benefits and that, therefore, a careful analysis and an unbiased approach are necessary;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Is of the opinion that decentralised banking networks such as saving and cooperative banks
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. In this context, is of the opinion that decentralised banking networks such as saving and cooperative banks
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Is of the opinion that decentralised banking networks such as saving and cooperative banks
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Is of the opinion that decentralised banking networks such as for example some saving and cooperative banks guarantee the continuity of financial markets even in smaller and remote markets; stresses that pluralistic banking markets and diversity of providers enhance competition throughout the EU banking market while ensuring the financing of the local economy and facilitating access to financial services for all customers;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. Considering the need to balance
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Maintains that non-discriminatory cooperation between independent credit entities, which as they are still competing with each other is more efficient and ensures greater interoperability and variety of services to the end customers, can help the sector to function and contribute to achieving the objectives of paragraph 12;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Is confident that the SEPA and the Payment Services Directive should provide solutions to the fragmentation and lack of competition identified by the sector inquiry concerning payment infrastructures; recalls that the first phase of the SEPA entered into force on 28 January 2008 and requires integrated clearing and settlement platforms, operating on the basis of the same rules and technical standards, emphasises that the access
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Is confident that the SEPA and the Payment Services Directive should provide solutions to the fragmentation and lack of competition identified by the sector inquiry concerning payment infrastructures; recalls that the first phase of the SEPA entered into force on 28 January 2008 and requires
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the Commission to investigate whether transposition of the Directive on payment services in the internal market is reducing the number of providers of payment settlement services and immediately to take steps if major providers develop a monopoly position that could reduce competition;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Notes that the Commission
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Notes that the Commission has repeatedly qualified multilateral interchange fees as anti-competitive and consequently requested the industry to abolish them; is of the opinion that the Commission should provide stakeholders with clear indications, guidelines and transparency requirements that could enable the industry to ensure a fair and transparent calculation method, compatible with EC competition law; recommends the Commission not to hesitate to propose ex ante regulation that aims to correct market imperfections if the situation does not improve within two or three years;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Notes that the Commission has repeatedly
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Notes that the Commission has repeatedly qualified specific multilateral interchange fees as anti-competitive
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Supports the integrated approach of the Commission consisting of supporting internal market policies with well-targeted sector inquiries; regrets nevertheless that there has been no examination of how monetary policy conditions are passed on to the retail market and the timing of this sector inquiry and encourages the Commission to follow up its work once the Capital Adequacy
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Notes that the Commission has
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Notes that the Commission has
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Believes in a strong need for better clarification concerning the
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Believes in a strong need for better clarification concerning the methodology and rules for the management of multilaterally agreed interchange fees for
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Believes in a strong need for better clarification concerning the methodology and rules for the management of multilaterally agreed interchange fees for ATMs and non-card payments; recalls that
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Believes in a strong need for better clarification concerning the methodology and rules for the management of multilaterally agreed interchange fees for ATMs and non-card payments; recalls that the SEPA direct debit scheme and the SEPA credit transfer scheme are two sided networks creating economic benefits thanks to network effects; asks the Commission to
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Regrets that the Commission inquiry does not take sufficient account of the specificities of the strictly regulated banking sector and the importance of culture, habits and languages in consumer choices for financial products; is furthermore concerned that the Commission's assessment of market integration builds on too few economic indicators and may consequently not duly reflect the characteristics of a dynamically developing and competitive retail banking sector;
source: PE-402.858
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/5/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15024&j=0&l=en
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15024&j=0&l=enNew
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15024&j=1&l=en |
events/0/date |
Old
2007-01-31T00:00:00New
2007-01-30T00:00:00 |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.585New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE400.585 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE402.858New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE402.858 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0185_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0185_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15024&j=1&l=en
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080604&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20080604&type=CRE |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-185&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0185_EN.html |
docs/5/body |
EC
|
docs/6/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-185&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0185_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-260New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0260_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ECON/6/51315New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/title |
Old
Competition: Sector inquiry on retail bankingNew
Competition: sector inquiry on retail banking |
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0033/COM_COM(2007)0033_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0033/COM_COM(2007)0033_EN.pdf |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|