Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | EMPL | LYNNE Elizabeth ( ALDE) | |
Committee Opinion | FEMM | ||
Committee Opinion | LIBE | ŽDANOKA Tatjana ( Verts/ALE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 362 votes to 262, with 56 abstentions, a resolution on progress made in equal opportunities and non-discrimination in the EU since the transposition of Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC.
The own initiative report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Elizabeth LYNNE (ALDE, UK), on behalf of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs.
The Parliament recalls, above all, that these two Directives provide minimum requirements and should be the foundation on which a more comprehensive Community anti-discrimination policy is built.
The Parliament also considers it necessary to:
ensure a better transposition of the applicable texts : concerned about the incorrect transposition and the insufficient implementation of these texts in some Member States, the Parliament calls on the EU to ensure that Directives 2000/78/EC and 2000/43/EC are fully, correctly and effectively transposed and adequately implemented. In this respect, the plenary reminds the Commission that Article 4 of Directive 2000/78/EC permits exceptions only to the extent that they are genuinely objectively necessary for the satisfactory performance of occupational activities. The Parliament therefore calls on the Commission to interpret that article strictly and to bring actions against Member States if they permit too broad a definition in their national legislation. It also calls on the Commission to draw up interpretive guidelines for implementation of these two directives to ensure the full and correct implementation by Member States. Further to this, the Parliament urges that sanctions be applied to infringements of national provisions adopted pursuant to the transposition of Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC and asks the Commission to assure that the legislation resulting from the transposition is complied with, and that it continues to put pressure on Member States by way of infringement procedures. Moreover, the Parliament asks for an annual evaluation of the implementation of these texts by Member States; combat and prevent the diverse forms of discrimination : the Parliament believes that the absence of a provision in Directive 2000/78/EC indicating the necessity for broad definitions of disability has excluded some categories of disabled people from the legal protection of the Directive. It, therefore, invites Member States and the Commission to agree sufficiently broad definitions of disability urgently, in order to facilitate the harmonisation of anti-discrimination legislation. The Parliament considers that exceptions linked to marital status in Directive 2000/78/EC have limited the protection against discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation offered by the Directive. On the whole, the Parliament urges the Member States to promote more effectively the application of the rights of citizens of the Union under the Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC, and calls for the establishment of national integrated action plans against all forms of discrimination. Moreover, equal treatment and opportunities under employment and social inclusion policies must be ensured, by addressing discrimination in recruitment procedures . The Parliament also calls for an end to all discrimination based on the employment contract by guaranteeing all workers: equal treatment, health and safety protection, provisions for working and rest time, freedom of association and representation, protection against unfair dismissal, collective bargaining and collective action; raise awareness of rights : the Parliament insists on the need to improve awareness of rights under antidiscrimination Directives and to ensure that victims of discrimination have access to a range of advocacy support. It insists that Member States empower independent, specialised equality bodies with the means to provide an effective help for victims of discrimination. At the same time, it is concerned about the low level of awareness of anti-discrimination legislation among citizens in the Member States and calls on the Commission, the Member States, trade unions and employers to step up their efforts to raise that level of awareness; help victims : Member States are called upon to ensure that statutory and non-statutory bodies that participate in the prevention of discrimination and that support the victims of discrimination are adequately resourced. In any case, Member States should ensure that victims of discrimination are automatically assisted in legal proceedings, if necessary by public funding through national legal aid schemes. The Parliament calls on the Commission to support the adoption of such measures through the Progress programme and the European Social Fund;
The Parliament also considers that, in legal terms, it is necessary to:
enlarge the scope of application of antidiscrimination directives : the Parliament strongly believes that the material scope of any directive concerning combating discrimination within the meaning of Article 13 of the EC Treaty must be broad, covering all the areas that fall under Community competence such as education, life-long learning, social protection, housing and healthcare, images of discriminated groups in the media and advertising, physical access to information for people with disabilities, telecommunications, electronic communication, transport modes and public spaces, social advantages and access to and supply of goods and services which are available to the public. Furthermore, it believes that any new directive should also develop the scope of Council Directive 76/207/EEC on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions so that it is consistent with the protection of other groups against discrimination. More generally, the Parliament believe that combating discrimination requires a holistic approach to raising public awareness, which must be developed beginning with suitable programmes in schools; adopt a new Directive based on Article 13 of the Treaty : the Parliament calls on the Commission to include provisions explicitly designed to combat multiple discrimination in any future legislation adopted under Article 13 of the EC Treaty. It considers that Directive 2000/43/EC is the foundation upon which a comprehensive antidiscrimination framework for measures relating to the prohibition against discrimination on the basis of race or ethnic origin can be built. The Commission is also called to produce a common, EU-wide definition of the meaning of positive action. The Parliament welcomes the Commission’s intention to draft a comprehensive directive to combat discrimination under Article 13 of the EC Treaty as provided in its 2008 work programme. In an amendment adopted in plenary by a small majority, the Parliament notes that the Commission may intend to put forward only legislation to outlaw discrimination in access to goods and services on some, but not all grounds. It reminds the Commission of its commitment to put forward a comprehensive directive covering disability, age, religion or belief and sexual orientation to complete the package of anti-discrimination legislation under Article 13 of the EC Treaty and reiterates the political, social and legal desirability of putting an end to the hierarchy of protection against the different grounds of discrimination , without which the result would be unbalanced. The plenary also notes that the Parliament awaits with interest the development of the Community definition of disability which will allow disabled people from all over the European Union to enjoy the same rights wherever they are situated within the European Union. At the same time, any new proposed directive in this area will have to prohibit all forms of discrimination, including direct and indirect discrimination, discrimination by association, discrimination linked to perceived membership of a protected group and harassment. Any future legislation under Article 13 of the EC Treaty should include an obligation to consult and include NGOs, independent specialised equality bodies, and representative national organisations, in regard to the drafting, the transposition process and the monitoring of its implementation. It should also include a requirement that Member States implement equality mainstreaming in all policies and address remedies and enforcement of the law.
The Parliament also calls for an end to the discrimination of the Roma community . It calls for specific social protection for these people, as well as measures in the areas of education, health, housing, employment and women’s rights. It also recommends high-quality education for Roma children.
Lastly, the Parliament stresses the importance of horizontal implementation and mainstreaming of the non-discrimination clauses (in the Lisbon Strategy for growth and employment, in the open method of coordination on social inclusion, in national reform programmes and in the regulations governing the structural funds etc).
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Elizabeth LYNNE (ALDE, UK) on progress made in equal opportunities and non-discrimination in the EU since the transposition of Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC, recalling that these two directives provide minimum requirements and that they should be the foundation on which a more comprehensive Community anti-discrimination policy is built.
For a better transposition : concerned about the incorrect transposition and the insufficient implementation of these texts in some Member States, MEPs call on the EU to ensure that Directives 2000/78/EC and 2000/43/EC are fully, correctly and effectively transposed and adequately implemented, and that any exemptions are objectively justified. They call on all the competent authorities of the EU and the Member States to improve the coordination of their efforts of implementation, and call for a unified approach to combating discrimination that is inclusive of, and takes into account, all grounds for discrimination at the same time. They also call on the Commission to draw up interpretive guidelines for implementation of these two directives to ensure the full and correct implementation by Member States. Further to this, MEPs urge that sanctions be applied to infringements of national provisions adopted pursuant to the transposition of Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC and ask the Commission to assure that the legislation resulting from the transposition is complied with, and that it continues to put pressure on Member States by way of infringement procedures. Moreover, MEPs ask for an annual evaluation of the implementation of these texts by Member States.
Combating diverse forms of discrimination : MEPs believe that the absence of a provision in Directive 2000/78/EC indicating the necessity for broad definitions of disability has excluded some categories of disabled people from the legal protection of the Directive. They, therefore, invite Member States and the Commission to agree sufficiently broad definitions of disability urgently, in order to facilitate the harmonisation of anti-discrimination legislation. They consider that exceptions linked to marital status in Directive 2000/78/EC have limited the protection against discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation offered by the Directive. On the whole, MEPs urge the Member States to promote more effectively the application of the rights of citizens of the Union under the Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC, and call for the establishment of national integrated action plans against all forms of discrimination. In addition, it is necessary to improve awareness of rights under those Directives and to ensure that victims of discrimination have access to a range of advocacy support. Moreover, equal treatment and opportunities under employment and social inclusion policies must be ensured, by addressing discrimination in recruitment procedures . MEPs also call for an end to all discrimination based on the employment contract by guaranteeing all workers: equal treatment, health and safety protection, provisions for working and rest time, freedom of association and representation, protection against unfair dismissal, collective bargaining and collective action.
Better awareness of rights and prevention of discrimination : MEPs insist that Member States empower independent, specialised equality bodies with the means to provide an effective help for victims of discrimination. They are concerned about the low level of awareness of anti-discrimination legislation among citizens in the Member States and call on the Commission, the Member States, trade unions and employers to step up their efforts to raise that level of awareness.
Helping victims : Member States are called upon to ensure that statutory and non-statutory bodies that participate in the prevention of discrimination and that support the victims of discrimination are adequately resourced. In any case, Member States should ensure that victims of discrimination are automatically assisted in legal proceedings, if necessary by public funding through national legal aid schemes. They call on the Commission to support the adoption of such measures through the Progress programme and the European Social Fund.
Enlarging the scope of application of antidiscrimination directives : MEPs strongly believe that the material scope of any directive concerning combating discrimination within the meaning of Article 13 of the EC Treaty must be broad, covering all the areas that fall under Community competence such as education, life-long learning, social protection, housing and healthcare, images of discriminated groups in the media and advertising, physical access to information for people with disabilities, telecommunications, electronic communication, transport modes and public spaces, social advantages and access to and supply of goods and services which are available to the public. Furthermore, they believe that any new directive should also develop the scope of Council Directive 76/207/EEC on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions so that it is consistent with the protection of other groups against discrimination. More generally, MEPs believe that combating discrimination necessitates a holistic approach to raising public awareness, which must be developed beginning with suitable programmes in schools.
Towards a new Directive based on Article 13 of the Treaty : MEPs call on the Commission to include provisions explicitly designed to combat multiple discrimination in any future legislation adopted under Article 13 of the EC Treaty. They consider that Directive 2000/43/EC is the foundation upon which a comprehensive antidiscrimination framework for measures relating to the prohibition against discrimination on the basis of race or ethnic origin can be built. The Commission is also called to produce a common, EU-wide definition of the meaning of positive action. MEPs welcome the Commission’s intention to draft a comprehensive directive to combat discrimination under Article 13 of the EC Treaty as provided in its 2008 work programme. For MEPs, any new Directive will have to prohibit all forms of discrimination, including direct and indirect discrimination in all areas already covered by Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC, discrimination by association or private clubs, discrimination linked to perceived membership of a protected group and harassment. They believe that the Directives should make clear that there is no hierarchy between the different forms of discrimination and suggest that the Commission promote the implementation of the principles of non-discrimination and equality which are not dependent on complaints being made by individual victims. In addition, MEPs believe that the differences in treatment based on nationality or language, which are neither objectively and reasonably justified by a legitimate aim nor achieved by appropriate and necessary means, may constitute indirect discrimination on the grounds of racial or ethnic origin contrary to Directive 2000/43/EC. Any future legislation under Article 13 of the EC Treaty must include an obligation to consult and include NGOs, independent specialised equality bodies, and representative national organisations in regard to its drafting, the transposition process and the monitoring of its implementation. It should also include a requirement that Member States implement equality mainstreaming in all policies, that service providers be systematic in their approach to equality, and that service providers provide special treatment to members of minority groups. The future proposal should also address remedies and enforcement of the law.
Discrimination with regard to the Roma community : MEPs object to the discrimination of which the Roma community is victim. They call for specific social protection for these people, as well as measures in the areas of education, health, housing, employment and women’s rights. They also recommend high-quality education for Roma children.
Treaty of Lisbon : lastly, MEPs stress the importance of horizontal implementation and mainstreaming of the non-discrimination clause of the Treaty of Lisbon after it comes into force. Equal opportunities and non-discrimination must be integrated in the Lisbon Strategy for growth and employment, in the guidelines for the open method of coordination on social inclusion, and in national reform programmes, as well as in the regulations governing the structural funds.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)4116/2
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)3593/2
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0212/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0159/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0159/2008
- Committee opinion: PE400.679
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE400.598
- Committee draft report: PE398.471
- Committee draft report: PE398.471
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE400.598
- Committee opinion: PE400.679
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0159/2008
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)3593/2
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)4116/2
Activities
- Philip BUSHILL-MATTHEWS
- Richard HOWITT
- Elizabeth LYNNE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Jim ALLISTER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edit BAUER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Iles BRAGHETTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marco CAPPATO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Luigi COCILOVO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gabriela CREȚU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bairbre de BRÚN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Carlo FATUZZO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lidia Joanna GERINGER DE OEDENBERG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Genowefa GRABOWSKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lissy GRÖNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zita GURMAI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marian HARKIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Stephen HUGHES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anneli JÄÄTTEENMÄKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Metin KAZAK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Magda KÓSÁNÉ KOVÁCS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Holger KRAHMER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean LAMBERT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bernard LEHIDEUX
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Katalin LÉVAI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Thomas MANN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jan Tadeusz MASIEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mario MAURO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marianne MIKKO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gay MITCHELL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ria OOMEN-RUIJTEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Siiri OVIIR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pier Antonio PANZERI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Hubert PIRKER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Hans-Gert PÖTTERING
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miloslav RANSDORF
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mechtild ROTHE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elisabeth SCHROEDTER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Csaba Sándor TABAJDI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ewa TOMASZEWSKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anja WEISGERBER
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Rapport Lynne A6-0159/2008 - am. 4 #
Rapport Lynne A6-0159/2008 - par. 6 #
IT | PL | NL | FI | HU | SE | MT | GB | CZ | FR | LT | BE | CY | AT | ES | EE | PT | LU | DK | SK | BG | SI | RO | EL | LV | IE | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
51
|
50
|
24
|
13
|
23
|
18
|
4
|
68
|
23
|
70
|
12
|
20
|
6
|
16
|
47
|
5
|
21
|
5
|
12
|
10
|
17
|
7
|
25
|
17
|
8
|
10
|
91
|
|
PSE |
193
|
Italy PSEFor (9)Against (3) |
Poland PSEFor (7)Abstain (1) |
Netherlands PSEAgainst (2) |
3
|
Hungary PSEFor (8) |
5
|
2
|
United Kingdom PSEFor (17)Against (2) |
2
|
France PSEFor (20)André LAIGNEL, Anne FERREIRA, Bernadette VERGNAUD, Béatrice PATRIE, Catherine BOURSIER, Catherine GUY-QUINT, Catherine NERIS, Catherine TRAUTMANN, Françoise CASTEX, Gilles SAVARY, Guy BONO, Jean Louis COTTIGNY, Marie-Arlette CARLOTTI, Marie-Noëlle LIENEMANN, Martine ROURE, Pervenche BERÈS, Roselyne LEFRANÇOIS, Stéphane LE FOLL, Vincent PEILLON, Yannick VAUGRENARD
Against (6) |
2
|
Belgium PSEAgainst (2) |
Austria PSEFor (6) |
Spain PSEFor (19)Alejandro CERCAS, Antonio MASIP HIDALGO, Bárbara DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP, Emilio MENÉNDEZ del VALLE, Enrique BARÓN CRESPO, Inés AYALA SENDER, Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ, Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ, Josep BORRELL FONTELLES, Juan FRAILE CANTÓN, Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA, Maria BADIA i CUTCHET, Martí GRAU i SEGÚ, María SORNOSA MARTÍNEZ, Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ, Raimon OBIOLS, Rosa MIGUÉLEZ RAMOS, Teresa RIERA MADURELL, Vicente Miguel GARCÉS RAMÓN
Against (5) |
2
|
Portugal PSEFor (9)Against (3) |
1
|
Denmark PSEAgainst (1) |
2
|
Bulgaria PSEFor (3)Against (2) |
1
|
Romania PSEFor (7)Against (1) |
Greece PSEAgainst (3) |
Germany PSEFor (19)Against (1) |
|||
ALDE |
84
|
Italy ALDEFor (4)Against (3)Abstain (1) |
Poland ALDEAgainst (1) |
Netherlands ALDE |
4
|
2
|
2
|
United Kingdom ALDEFor (7)Against (1)Abstain (1) |
France ALDEFor (6)Against (4) |
Lithuania ALDEAgainst (2) |
Belgium ALDEFor (2)Against (2) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Bulgaria ALDEAgainst (1) |
2
|
Romania ALDEFor (3)Against (3) |
1
|
1
|
Germany ALDEFor (1)Against (4)Abstain (1) |
||||||
GUE/NGL |
35
|
Italy GUE/NGLFor (4)Against (2) |
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Czechia GUE/NGLFor (4)Against (2) |
2
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (6)Against (1) |
|||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
39
|
2
|
Netherlands Verts/ALEAgainst (1) |
1
|
1
|
4
|
France Verts/ALEFor (2)Against (3) |
2
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (6)Against (6) |
|||||||||||||
UEN |
34
|
Italy UENAgainst (1) |
Poland UENFor (13)Against (6) |
2
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
28
|
3
|
2
|
United Kingdom NIFor (2)Against (2)Abstain (2) |
1
|
France NIFor (1)Against (5) |
3
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
||||||||||||||||||
IND/DEM |
19
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
United Kingdom IND/DEMAgainst (7) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||
PPE-DE |
241
|
Italy PPE-DEFor (7)Against (8) |
Poland PPE-DEAgainst (10) |
Netherlands PPE-DEFor (3)Against (2) |
Finland PPE-DEFor (1)Against (3) |
Hungary PPE-DEFor (4)Against (8)Abstain (1) |
Sweden PPE-DEFor (1)Against (5) |
2
|
United Kingdom PPE-DEFor (3)Against (19)
Christopher BEAZLEY,
David SUMBERG,
Den DOVER,
Edward MCMILLAN-SCOTT,
Giles CHICHESTER,
James ELLES,
James NICHOLSON,
John BOWIS,
John PURVIS,
Malcolm HARBOUR,
Martin CALLANAN,
Philip BRADBOURN,
Philip BUSHILL-MATTHEWS,
Richard ASHWORTH,
Robert STURDY,
Struan STEVENSON,
Syed KAMALL,
Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK,
Timothy KIRKHOPE
|
Czechia PPE-DEFor (7)Against (6) |
France PPE-DEAgainst (15) |
2
|
Belgium PPE-DEFor (1)Against (4) |
3
|
Austria PPE-DEFor (1)Against (4) |
Spain PPE-DEAgainst (17)
Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA,
Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS,
Carlos ITURGAIZ,
Carmen FRAGA ESTÉVEZ,
Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES,
Daniel VARELA SUANZES-CARPEGNA,
Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA,
Francisco José MILLÁN MON,
Gerardo GALEOTE,
Jaime MAYOR OREJA,
José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA,
José Manuel GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL,
Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL,
Pilar AYUSO,
Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA,
Salvador GARRIGA POLLEDO,
Íñigo MÉNDEZ DE VIGO
|
1
|
Portugal PPE-DEAgainst (6) |
3
|
1
|
Slovakia PPE-DEFor (2)Against (4) |
Bulgaria PPE-DEFor (1)Against (3) |
4
|
Romania PPE-DEFor (1)Against (9) |
Greece PPE-DEAgainst (6) |
3
|
4
|
Germany PPE-DEAgainst (40)
Albert DESS,
Alexander RADWAN,
Alfred GOMOLKA,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Anja WEISGERBER,
Christa KLASS,
Christoph KONRAD,
Daniel CASPARY,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Doris PACK,
Elisabeth JEGGLE,
Ewa KLAMT,
Gabriele STAUNER,
Georg JARZEMBOWSKI,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Hans-Peter MAYER,
Hartmut NASSAUER,
Herbert REUL,
Horst SCHNELLHARDT,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Ingo FRIEDRICH,
Jürgen SCHRÖDER,
Karl von WOGAU,
Karl-Heinz FLORENZ,
Karsten Friedrich HOPPENSTEDT,
Klaus-Heiner LEHNE,
Kurt Joachim LAUK,
Kurt LECHNER,
Lutz GOEPEL,
Manfred WEBER,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Peter LIESE,
Reimer BÖGE,
Renate SOMMER,
Roland GEWALT,
Ruth HIERONYMI,
Thomas MANN,
Werner LANGEN
Abstain (1) |
Rapport Lynne A6-0159/2008 - am. 6 #
Rapport Lynne A6-0159/2008 - am. 7 #
Rapport Lynne A6-0159/2008 - am. 8 #
Rapport Lynne A6-0159/2008 - ams. 1+16+17 #
Rapport Lynne A6-0159/2008 - am. 9 #
Rapport Lynne A6-0159/2008 - am. 10 #
Rapport Lynne A6-0159/2008 - am. 11 #
Rapport Lynne A6-0159/2008 - am. 12 #
Rapport Lynne A6-0159/2008 - am. 13 #
Rapport Lynne A6-0159/2008 - am. 14 #
Rapport Lynne A6-0159/2008 - résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
13 |
2007/2202(INI)
2008/03/05
LIBE
13 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Regrets that the Commission, in order to ensure that the Member States duly and fully comply with Directive 2000/78/EC, had to send reasoned opinions on 31 January 2008 for failure to implement the Directive to ten Member States (the Czech Republic, Estonia, Ireland, Greece, France, Hungary, Malta, Netherlands, Finland and Sweden), as well as a letter of formal notice to Germany and two complementary letters of formal notice to Latvia and Lithuania; also notes that the first steps in infringement proceedings have been taken against Belgium and Slovakia, Denmark, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Spain and the United Kingdom, while the transposition of the Directive in Austria, Luxembourg, Bulgaria and Romania is being analysed; calls on those Member States to comply with the Directive fully and without delay;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Considers that minority communities
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Considers that minority communities, and in particular the Roma one, need specific social protection, since the problems of exploitation, discrimination and exclusion have become even more
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Recommends that, as regards access to quality education for disadvantaged and Roma children and their unjustified classification as disabled, special attention be paid to fighting all forms of discrimination encountered in the field of education;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Urges the Commission to issue as soon as possible its proposal for a horizontal directive implementing the principle of equal treatment outside of employment, including access to goods, services and housing, education, social protection and social advantages, immigration and asylum, and covering all grounds of discrimination set out in Article 13 of the EC Treaty;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Member States to make use of all the instruments available
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for strict monitoring of the application of the rules on the burden of proof and the filing of claims in the public interest;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Is aware that measures to protect against discrimination give rise to bureaucracy and costs, for business in particular; recommends that this be taken into account in relation to future measures and therefore calls for caution with regard to further legislation;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Considers that discrimination must also be seen as interfering with the four fundamental freedoms - particularly the free movement of persons - and as such constitutes an obstacle to the functioning of the internal market; calls on the Commission to encourage the Member States to review their transitional provisions regulating access to their labour markets in order to eliminate differences between European citizens in this respect;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Regrets that Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC do not cover differences in treatment of a discriminatory nature based on physical criteria such as height or complexion, particularly in relation to access to jobs where there is no direct link between those physical characteristics and the ability required in order to do the jobs concerned;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 source: PE-402.839
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE400.679&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-400679_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14919&j=0&l=en
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE398.471New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE398.471 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.598New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE400.598 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.679&secondRef=03New
http://nullEN&reference=PE400.679&secondRef=03 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0159_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0159_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14919&j=1&l=en
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080520&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20080520&type=CRE |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-159&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0159_EN.html |
docs/4/body |
EC
|
docs/5/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-159&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0159_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-212New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0212_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
EMPL/6/53511New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/subtype |
Old
InitiativeNew
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|