Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CULT | MAVROMMATIS Manolis ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | FEMM | LOCATELLI Pia Elda ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | EMPL | BOZKURT Emine ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | REGI | GALEOTE Gerardo ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | ECON | RYAN Eoin ( UEN) | |
Committee Opinion | LIBE | DE LANGE Esther ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | IMCO | MANDERS Antonius ( ALDE) | |
Committee Opinion | JURI | GILL Neena ( PSE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted, by 518 votes to 49 with 9 abstentions, a resolution welcoming the Commission's White Paper on Sport which was significantly amended in plenary.
The own-initiative report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Manolis MAVROMMATIS (EPP-ED, EL) on behalf of the Committee on Culture and Education. MEPs recall the importance of sport in society, bearing in mind that it generated an added value of EUR 407 billion in 2004 (3.7% of EU GDP) and employment for 15 million people (5.4% of the labour force).
Parliament welcomes the fact that Member States recognised sport officially in the Lisbon Treaty, enabling the Commission to promote and complement – but not to regulate – the actions of Member States and sports organisations. The complementary competences relating to sport contained in Article 149 of the EC Treaty as amended by the Lisbon Treaty should be exercised by the Commission with regard to the principle of subsidiarity, respecting the autonomy of sports organisations and the relevant governing bodies, and with due regard to the specificity of sport. Parliament asks the Commission to have due respect for the specificity of sports, by not taking a case-by-case approach. The Commission is asked to provide more legal certainty by creating clear guidelines on the applicability of European law to sports in Europe and by supporting studies and seminars on the concrete application of the 'acquis communautaire' on sport.
Parliament agrees that most challenges can be addressed through self-regulation in line with good governance principles, provided that EU law is respected. It acknowledges the roles of the principal actors in professional team-sports, i.e. the clubs as the basic unit, employing players and providing the main link with supporters; players' unions as representatives of the employees; leagues, as the competent organisers at national level and employers" representatives, together with the clubs; and the governing bodies as the guardians of the sport and the rules of the game; with all four elements working to achieve good health, integrity and solidarity within spor. It takes the view that a sports body is free to govern its sport where its rules are purely sporting ones, but where they involve restrictions, these must be proportionate, that is, reasonably necessary to achieve their sporting objective(s), within the framework of EU law. Owing to the large-scale movement of capital in the context of transfers, financial transactions should be conducted openly and transparently between all parties involved and, depending on the sport, the system should be run by the relevant governing body. The resolution asks Member States and sports governing bodies to support the creation of supporters' federations and promote their involvement in the management and administration of games. Parliament encourages the Commission to promote the implementation of self-regulatory licensing systems at national and European level.
Doping: MEPs request Member States to agree on a common legislative approach towards doping and to define common positions in relation to WADA, UNESCO and the Council of Europe. In particular, MEPs call on Member States to treat the trade in illegal doping substances in the same manner as the trade in illicit drugs and to combat doping by avoiding excessively busy schedules that put pressure on athletes. They recommend checks, increased research and testing, long-term monitoring by independent doctors and measures focusing on prevention and training of athletes. MEPs call for an action plan on the fight against doping, in the run-up to the London 2012 Olympics. Member States are asked to ensure more comprehensive information and education for young sports competitors regarding performance-enhancing drugs, prescriptions which may contain them and their effect on health.
Education, young people and health: stressing the role of sport in transmitting the fundamental values of tolerance, honesty and respect for the rules of fair play, MEPs insist on the concrete benefits of sport in terms of health and the fight against obesity. They welcome the Commission proposal regarding the award of a European prize to schools actively supporting physical exercise as part of the curriculum. Parliament recommends that Member States recognise the need to provide "dual career" sporting and academic training for young sportsmen and sportswomen, from the outset, in order to ensure that professional sportsmen and sportswomen can reintegrate into the labour market at the end of their careers. The Commission is asked to recognise the legality of measures favouring the promotion of players who have come through training schemes, such as a minimum number of locally-trained players, irrespective of their nationality, on the professional staff. Parliament calls on the Commission to encourage measures by sports organisations to protect young sportsmen and sportswomen, with due respect for the specificity of sport, by openly expressing itself in favour of stricter application of the FIFA regulations banning transfers of players aged under 16 within the EU and endorsing the principle that players should sign their first professional contract with the club which has trained them.
Social inclusion and anti-discrimination: sport is one of the most effective tools for social integration and should be promoted by the EU to a greater extent, e.g. through special programmes for organisers of European, national and local sporting and recreational events. These opportunities should be extended, in particular, to organisers of sporting events that promote integration and involve disabled people. Within the context of the 2008 European Year of Intercultural Dialogue, particular attention must be given to the role of sport as the ultimate arena for intercultural co-existence and a cornerstone for dialogue with third countries. Parliament calls on professional sports organisations and sports clubs to launch campaigns to tackle all forms of discrimination, racism and xenophobia before, during and after sporting activities by participants and spectators, both inside and outside stadiums. It regrets that the gender aspect is not adequately taken into account in the White Paper, especially regarding equal pay for equal value and the fact that female athletes earn less than their male counterparts.
Policing of sports events: Parliament calls on Member States to encourage the exchange of best practices and of operational information on risk-supporters between police services, supporter initiatives, local anti-violence groups and experts and the sports authorities. All parties concerned must play an active role, eliciting immediate and more stringent sanctions against racism and violence.
Economic aspects: MEPs call for legislation and/or the strengthening of existing regulations on intellectual property rights relating to commercial communications, trademarks and images, names, media rights and any other spin-offs from the sporting events organisers are running, so as to protect the professional sport economy, while respecting the right of "short reporting" as stipulated by Directive 2007/65/EC ('Audiovisual Media Services' Directive). In particular, problems of ambush marketing, internet piracy and unlawful sports betting should be addressed as a priority by Member States and the Commission. Parliament repeats its support for Member States drawing up a list of events of major importance to the public that should be on free-to-air television under Article 3a of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive and it condemns FIFA's court actions in this respect. Parliament voices its concern at a possible deregulation of the market in gambling and lotteries. It calls on the Commission and the Member States to adopt regulatory measures which ensure that sport is protected from any improper influence relating to betting, and to carry out a study of the potential effects of full deregulation of the market in gambling and lotteries, and of what types of control mechanisms could be used to protect consumers.
Employment of sports people: professional athletes should have as broad a range of rights as other workers, including the right to enter or refuse to enter into collective agreements and membership of professional trade unions and to have recourse to ordinary courts of law. Member States and sports associations are asked not to introduce new rules that create direct discrimination based on nationality (such as the 6 + 5 rule proposed by FIFA, in contrast to UEFA's more proportionate and non-discriminatory home-grown player scheme).The Commission is asked to support the efforts of sports governing bodies to regulate players' agents, if necessary by presenting a proposal for a directive concerning players' agents.
EU sport funding: lastly, Parliament requests a special budget line for preparatory actions in the field of sport under the 2009 budget. Since Article 149 of the EC Treaty as amended by the Lisbon Treaty, provides for incentive measures in the area of sport and since a specific EU funding programme on sport would not be operational before 2011 – assuming the Lisbon Treaty is ratified by the 27 Member States – Parliament acknowledges the need to prepare the programme through preparatory actions as from 2009. It calls on the Commission to launch preparatory actions in the field of social inclusion and sport, focusing on projects with clear European added value. It urges the Commission to support projects that fulfil this aim, such as the Special Olympics Unified Sports initiative.
The Committee on Culture and Education adopted the own initiative report by Manolis MAVROMMATIS (EPP-ED, EL) on the White Paper on Sport, welcoming the publication of the Commission’s White Paper and hoping that it serves as a basis for the sports world and the Commission to engage in a continuous dialogue in this area.
First of all, MEPs recall the importance of sport in society, bearing in mind that it generated an added value of EUR 407 billion in 2004 (3.7% of EU GDP) and employment for 15 million people (5.4% of the labour force). They also recall that 60% of EU citizens regularly participate in a sporting activity either in or outside of some 700 000 clubs. That is why they welcome the fact that sport has been recognised at Community level, particularly since the Lisbon Treaty, which, for the first time, dedicates an article – Article 49 – to incentive measures in this area. However, MEPs insist that all European policies on sport should take into consideration specific national features and therefore call on the Commission to promote, but not to regulate, the actions of Member States in this area, for example through clear guidelines on the application of EU legislation.
MEPs call on the Commission to ensure clarity, coherence and public visibility of EU rules applicable to sport. Overall, MEPs support the Commission’s position in this area, which recommends, above all, self-regulation. They also believe that it is necessary to promote dialogue between sports organisations and the Commission.
Self-regulation : going by the Commission’s position in this area, MEPs promote self-regulation provided that it is in compliance with Community law. Self-regulation should increase good governance and create a level playing field concerning financial transparency and stability of services in sport. MEPs hope to prevent all forms of 'financial doping' by ensuring the transparency of cash flows within sport. They call on sport federations to ensure that the licensing systems they choose do not lead to discrimination and that they comply with the principles of the internal market. In this context, MEPs welcome the Commission’s proposal to hold a conference with UEFA, EPFL and Fifpro, as well as the national associations and national bodies responsible for organising professional football events in order to discuss licensing arrangements and best practices within this specific domain.
Doping : MEPs request Member States to agree on a common legislative approach towards doping and to define common positions in relation to WADA, UNESCO and the Council of Europe. In particular, MEPs call on Member States to treat the trade in illegal doping substances in the same manner as the trade in illicit drugs and to actively combat doping by avoiding excessively busy schedules that put pressure on athletes. To combat doping, MEPs recommend checks, increased research and testing, long-term monitoring by independent doctors and measures focusing on prevention and training of athletes. It is also essential that professional clubs and sports organisations adopt a pledge to combat doping. It is in this context that MEPs call for a specific action plan on the fight against doping, in the run-up to the London 2012 Olympics.
Education, young people and health : stressing the role of sport in transmitting the fundamental values of tolerance, honesty and respect for the rules of fair play, MEPs insist on the concrete benefits of sport in terms of health and the fight against obesity. They welcome the Commission’s proposal to promote sport and physical exercise in education and support the implementation of strategies, under the educational programmes, which seek to increase children's physical activity from a very early age. They call on Member States to approve the Commission’s proposal regarding the award of a European prize to schools actively supporting physical exercise as part of the curriculum. However, to promote quality physical education, there is a need for massive investment in this area, and not only in financial terms. That is why MEPs call on the Commission to recognise the legality of measures favouring the promotion of players who have come through training schemes, such as a minimum number of locally-trained players, irrespective of their nationality, on the professional staff. At the same time, MEPs call on Member States to combat the exploitation of girls and boys in sports and child trafficking. In particular, they deplore the practice of Member State governments selling school playing-fields for development. Furthermore, they consider it necessary to facilitate free access for people under 14 to all national and international competitions. In addition, MEPs call on the Commission to encourage the promotion of environmental and health protection during European sporting events.
Social inclusion and anti-discrimination : MEPs stress that sport is one of the most effective tools for social integration and, as such, should be promoted and supported by the European Union to a greater extent, for example through special programmes for organisers of European, national and local sporting and recreational events. Efforts should also be made to adapt sports’ and schools’ infrastructure to the needs of disabled people. At the same time, MEPs regret the fact that the gender aspect is not adequately taken into account in the White Paper (for example, on issues such as equal pay for equal value). Particular attention should be paid to access to sport for immigrant women and women from ethnic minorities. Furthermore, MEPs stress the particularly important role of sports for the social inclusion of those from less privileged backgrounds. Therefore, they call on Member States to incorporate sports activities and programmes in initiatives financed by the European Social Fund.
Policing of sports events : in order to prevent and address cases of violence and racism at sports events, MEPs call on Member States to encourage the exchange of best practices and of operational information on risk-supporters between police services. MEPs call on all parties concerned to play an active role by eliciting immediate and more stringent sanctions against racism and violence, be they on the field or in the stands, and to ensure high minimum standards are guaranteed by public authorities and competition organisers. At European level, MEPs call for increased cross-border police cooperation.
Economic aspects : MEPs call for the introduction of legislation to attach particular importance to respecting intellectual property rights relating to commercial communications, trademarks and images, names, media rights and any other spin-offs from sporting events. While they acknowledge the right of all media to access organised sporting events of public significance, they reiterate their support for Member States drawing up a list of events of major importance to the public that should be on free-to-air television. On another level, MEPs believe that an equitable redistribution of income between sport clubs, including the smallest ones, within and between the leagues, and between professional and amateur sport is essential. They also welcome the Commission's recognition of collective selling of media rights as a tool for achieving greater solidarity within sports. In terms of investment in sport, MEPs hope to ensure a continued source of alternative funding for non-professional sport, for example through national lotteries or other means. They voice their concern at a possible deregulation of the market in gambling and call on the Commission to evaluate the possible effects of deregulation of this sector on sport. MEPs also consider the issue of betting on sports and ask the Commission to come forward with a proposal preventing misuse and corruption. They also called for measures relating to tax. In addition, MEPs call for a percentage of the revenue generated by the sale of media rights to be allocated directly to funding the volunteer and non-profit sectors of sport.
Issues related to the employment of sports people : MEPs consider it undesirable for professional athletes to have fewer rights than other contracted workers. It is therefore necessary to ensure equal treatment through EU non-discrimination legislation. On the issue of the transfer of players, MEPs call on Member States to ensure, through their national legislation, that any rule in a European context respects EU law, particularly regarding the free movement of workers. MEPs insist that immigration law must always be respected in relation to the recruitment of young foreign talent in Europe. They call on the Commission to tackle the problem of child trafficking, to subscribe to a European charter for solidarity, to create a Solidarity Fund that would finance prevention programmes in countries most affected by human trafficking and to review the FIFA Regulations for the Status and Transfer of Players in relation to the protection of minors. MEPs also consider that the regulatory provisions concerning players' agents should be strengthened and they call on the Commission to support this initiative, including through a Directive, if necessary.
EU sport funding : lastly, MEPs request for the 2009 budget a special budget line for preparatory actions in the field of sport, bearing in mind that a specific EU funding programme on sport would not be operational before 2011 (assuming the Lisbon Treaty is ratified). At the same time, MEPs call on the Commission to launch preparatory actions in the field of social inclusion and sport and to take into consideration the possibility of creating supporting programmes for students with special physical qualities. Furthermore, they urge the Commission to mainstream sport properly in existing EU policies and EU funding programmes.
PURPOSE: to give strategic orientation on the role of sport in Europe, to encourage debate on specific problems, to enhance the visibility of sport in EU policy-making and to raise public awareness of the needs and specificities of the sector.
BACKGROUND: sport is a growing social and economic phenomenon which makes an important contribution to the European Union's strategic objectives of solidarity and prosperity. It promotes the active contribution of EU citizens to society and thereby helps to foster active citizenship. However, sport is also confronted with new threats and challenges which have emerged in European society, such as commercial pressure, exploitation of young players, doping, racism, violence, corruption and money laundering.
CONTENT: this White Paper focuses on the societal role of sport, its economic dimension and its organisation in Europe, and on the follow-up that will be given to this initiative.
Societal role: sport is an area of human activity that greatly interests citizens of the European Union and has enormous potential for bringing them together, reaching out to all, regardless of age or social origin. It encapsulates the following social issues:
enhancing public health; fighting against doping; enhancing the role of sport in education and training; promoting volunteering and active citizenship; promoting social inclusion, integration and equal opportunities; combating racism and violence; sharing values with other parts of the world; supporting sustainable development.
The Commission supports a wide range of initiatives and proposals concerning these issues, including the development of new physical activity guidelines, anti-doping partnerships and the promotion of dialogue for combating racist and xenophobic attitudes in sport, among others.
Economic dimension: Sport is a dynamic and fast-growing sector with an underestimated macro-economic impact, and can contribute to the Lisbon objectives of growth and job creation. It can serve as a tool for local and regional development, urban regeneration or rural development. On the other hand, notwithstanding the overall economic importance of sport, the vast majority of sporting activities take place in non-profit structures, many of which depend on public support to provide access to sporting activities to all citizens.
Sport organisations have many sources of income, including ticket sales, advertising, sponsorship and media rights, for example. However, some sport organisations have considerably better access to resources from business operators than others. In grassroots sport, equal opportunities and open access to sporting activities can only be guaranteed through strong public involvement. The Commission understands the importance of public support for grassroots sport and sport for all, and is in favour of such support provided it is granted in accordance with Community law.
Organisation of sport: The political debate on sport in Europe often attributes considerable importance to the so-called "European Sport Model". The Commission considers that certain values and traditions of European sport should be promoted. In view of the diversity and complexities of European sport structures it considers, however, that it is unrealistic to try to define a unified model of organisation of sport in Europe. Sport activity is subject to the application of EU law but also has certain specific characteristics, notably in terms of rules and structure. This specificity of sport has been recognised by European courts and the Commission.
There are many challenges to be faced in sport, including combating discrimination, promoting the free movement of EU citizens, protecting minors from exploitation and fighting corruption and money-laundering activities. The Commission is committed to achieving these objectives.
Follow-up: The Commission will follow up on the initiatives presented in this White Paper through the implementation of a structured dialogue with sport stakeholders, cooperation with the Member States, and the promotion of social dialogue in the sport sector.
The White Paper contains a number of actions to be implemented or supported by the Commission. Together, these actions form the "Pierre de Coubertin" Action Plan which will guide the Commission in its sport-related activities during the coming years.
PURPOSE: to give strategic orientation on the role of sport in Europe, to encourage debate on specific problems, to enhance the visibility of sport in EU policy-making and to raise public awareness of the needs and specificities of the sector.
BACKGROUND: sport is a growing social and economic phenomenon which makes an important contribution to the European Union's strategic objectives of solidarity and prosperity. It promotes the active contribution of EU citizens to society and thereby helps to foster active citizenship. However, sport is also confronted with new threats and challenges which have emerged in European society, such as commercial pressure, exploitation of young players, doping, racism, violence, corruption and money laundering.
CONTENT: this White Paper focuses on the societal role of sport, its economic dimension and its organisation in Europe, and on the follow-up that will be given to this initiative.
Societal role: sport is an area of human activity that greatly interests citizens of the European Union and has enormous potential for bringing them together, reaching out to all, regardless of age or social origin. It encapsulates the following social issues:
enhancing public health; fighting against doping; enhancing the role of sport in education and training; promoting volunteering and active citizenship; promoting social inclusion, integration and equal opportunities; combating racism and violence; sharing values with other parts of the world; supporting sustainable development.
The Commission supports a wide range of initiatives and proposals concerning these issues, including the development of new physical activity guidelines, anti-doping partnerships and the promotion of dialogue for combating racist and xenophobic attitudes in sport, among others.
Economic dimension: Sport is a dynamic and fast-growing sector with an underestimated macro-economic impact, and can contribute to the Lisbon objectives of growth and job creation. It can serve as a tool for local and regional development, urban regeneration or rural development. On the other hand, notwithstanding the overall economic importance of sport, the vast majority of sporting activities take place in non-profit structures, many of which depend on public support to provide access to sporting activities to all citizens.
Sport organisations have many sources of income, including ticket sales, advertising, sponsorship and media rights, for example. However, some sport organisations have considerably better access to resources from business operators than others. In grassroots sport, equal opportunities and open access to sporting activities can only be guaranteed through strong public involvement. The Commission understands the importance of public support for grassroots sport and sport for all, and is in favour of such support provided it is granted in accordance with Community law.
Organisation of sport: The political debate on sport in Europe often attributes considerable importance to the so-called "European Sport Model". The Commission considers that certain values and traditions of European sport should be promoted. In view of the diversity and complexities of European sport structures it considers, however, that it is unrealistic to try to define a unified model of organisation of sport in Europe. Sport activity is subject to the application of EU law but also has certain specific characteristics, notably in terms of rules and structure. This specificity of sport has been recognised by European courts and the Commission.
There are many challenges to be faced in sport, including combating discrimination, promoting the free movement of EU citizens, protecting minors from exploitation and fighting corruption and money-laundering activities. The Commission is committed to achieving these objectives.
Follow-up: The Commission will follow up on the initiatives presented in this White Paper through the implementation of a structured dialogue with sport stakeholders, cooperation with the Member States, and the promotion of social dialogue in the sport sector.
The White Paper contains a number of actions to be implemented or supported by the Commission. Together, these actions form the "Pierre de Coubertin" Action Plan which will guide the Commission in its sport-related activities during the coming years.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)3956
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)3593/2
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0198/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0149/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0149/2008
- Committee opinion: PE400.484
- Committee opinion: PE400.541
- Committee opinion: PE400.666
- Committee opinion: PE402.497
- Committee opinion: PE398.681
- Committee opinion: PE400.386
- Committee opinion: PE398.653
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE400.553
- Committee draft report: PE398.399
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2007)0391
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)0932
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)0934
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)0935
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)0936
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2007)0391
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2007)0391 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)0932 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)0934 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)0935 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)0936 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE398.399
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE400.553
- Committee opinion: PE398.653
- Committee opinion: PE400.386
- Committee opinion: PE398.681
- Committee opinion: PE400.484
- Committee opinion: PE400.541
- Committee opinion: PE400.666
- Committee opinion: PE402.497
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0149/2008
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)3593/2
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)3956
Activities
- Emine BOZKURT
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Manolis MAVROMMATIS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Mario MAURO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Ivo BELET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Jean-Luc BENNAHMIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Slavi BINEV
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Costas BOTOPOULOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Sharon BOWLES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Iles BRAGHETTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Magor Imre CSIBI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Antonio DE BLASIO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Věra FLASAROVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Christofer FJELLNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Gerardo GALEOTE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Christopher HEATON-HARRIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Gyula HEGYI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Monica Maria IACOB-RIDZI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Rumiana JELEVA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Lasse LEHTINEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Marusya LYUBCHEVA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Edward MCMILLAN-SCOTT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Ramona Nicole MĂNESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Sebastiano (Nello) MUSUMECI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Siiri OVIIR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Doris PACK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Zdzisław Zbigniew PODKAŃSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Mihaela POPA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Christa PRETS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Toomas SAVI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Pál SCHMITT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Martin SCHULZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Grażyna STANISZEWSKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Hannu TAKKULA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Donato Tommaso VERALDI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Thomas WISE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
- Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 White Paper on Sport (debate)
Votes
Rapport Mavrommatis A6-0149/2008 - am. 2/1 #
Rapport Mavrommatis A6-0149/2008 - par. 2 #
DE | FR | ES | IT | BG | PT | GB | BE | EL | NL | AT | LT | DK | RO | HU | FI | SK | MT | IE | EE | LU | LV | CZ | ?? | PL | CY | SI | SE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
77
|
56
|
45
|
53
|
16
|
19
|
66
|
21
|
18
|
24
|
15
|
10
|
13
|
16
|
19
|
12
|
12
|
4
|
11
|
5
|
5
|
8
|
21
|
2
|
45
|
4
|
7
|
16
|
|
PSE |
169
|
Germany PSEFor (13)Against (4) |
France PSEFor (21)Anne FERREIRA, Benoît HAMON, Bernadette BOURZAI, Bernadette VERGNAUD, Brigitte DOUAY, Béatrice PATRIE, Catherine GUY-QUINT, Catherine TRAUTMANN, Françoise CASTEX, Guy BONO, Harlem DÉSIR, Henri WEBER, Jean Louis COTTIGNY, Kader ARIF, Marie-Arlette CARLOTTI, Marie-Noëlle LIENEMANN, Martine ROURE, Michel ROCARD, Pervenche BERÈS, Pierre PRIBETICH, Yannick VAUGRENARD
Against (1) |
Spain PSEFor (17)Alejandro CERCAS, Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO, Antonio MASIP HIDALGO, Carlos CARNERO GONZÁLEZ, Enrique BARÓN CRESPO, Inés AYALA SENDER, Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ, Josep BORRELL FONTELLES, Juan FRAILE CANTÓN, Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA, Martí GRAU i SEGÚ, María Isabel SALINAS GARCÍA, Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ, Raimon OBIOLS, Rosa MIGUÉLEZ RAMOS, Teresa RIERA MADURELL, Vicente Miguel GARCÉS RAMÓN
|
Italy PSEFor (7)Against (4) |
Bulgaria PSEAgainst (1) |
Portugal PSEFor (10)Against (1) |
United Kingdom PSEFor (17) |
Belgium PSEAgainst (2) |
Greece PSEAgainst (2) |
Netherlands PSEFor (4)Against (2) |
Austria PSEAgainst (1) |
1
|
Denmark PSEAgainst (2) |
Romania PSEAgainst (2) |
Hungary PSEAgainst (4) |
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
Poland PSEAgainst (1) |
1
|
4
|
||||
ALDE |
82
|
Germany ALDEFor (7) |
France ALDEFor (7) |
2
|
Italy ALDEFor (10) |
3
|
United Kingdom ALDEFor (10) |
4
|
Netherlands ALDE |
1
|
Lithuania ALDEFor (6) |
4
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Poland ALDEAgainst (1) |
1
|
2
|
2
|
||||||
PPE-DE |
226
|
Germany PPE-DEFor (28)Andreas SCHWAB, Angelika NIEBLER, Anja WEISGERBER, Christa KLASS, Christoph KONRAD, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Doris PACK, Elisabeth JEGGLE, Ewa KLAMT, Hans-Peter MAYER, Hartmut NASSAUER, Horst POSDORF, Horst SCHNELLHARDT, Ingo FRIEDRICH, Karsten Friedrich HOPPENSTEDT, Klaus-Heiner LEHNE, Kurt Joachim LAUK, Kurt LECHNER, Lutz GOEPEL, Manfred WEBER, Markus FERBER, Michael GAHLER, Peter LIESE, Rainer WIELAND, Renate SOMMER, Roland GEWALT, Rolf BEREND, Thomas ULMER
Against (10) |
France PPE-DEFor (11)Against (4) |
Spain PPE-DEFor (17)Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA, Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS, Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE, Carlos ITURGAIZ, Carmen FRAGA ESTÉVEZ, Daniel VARELA SUANZES-CARPEGNA, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Fernando FERNÁNDEZ MARTÍN, Florencio LUQUE AGUILAR, Gerardo GALEOTE, Jaime MAYOR OREJA, José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA, José Javier POMÉS RUIZ, José Manuel GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL, Juan Andrés NARANJO ESCOBAR, Pilar AYUSO, Salvador Domingo SANZ PALACIO
Against (2) |
Italy PPE-DEFor (11)Against (5) |
Bulgaria PPE-DE |
Portugal PPE-DEFor (5) |
United Kingdom PPE-DEFor (4)Against (18)
Christopher HEATON-HARRIS,
Den DOVER,
Edward MCMILLAN-SCOTT,
Giles CHICHESTER,
James ELLES,
James NICHOLSON,
John BOWIS,
Jonathan EVANS,
Malcolm HARBOUR,
Martin CALLANAN,
Philip BRADBOURN,
Philip BUSHILL-MATTHEWS,
Richard ASHWORTH,
Robert STURDY,
Sir Robert ATKINS,
Struan STEVENSON,
Syed KAMALL,
Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK
|
Belgium PPE-DEAgainst (2) |
Netherlands PPE-DEAgainst (2) |
Austria PPE-DEFor (4)Against (1) |
1
|
1
|
Romania PPE-DEAgainst (3) |
Hungary PPE-DEFor (7)Against (3) |
Finland PPE-DEFor (1)Against (3) |
Slovakia PPE-DEAgainst (2) |
2
|
Ireland PPE-DEFor (2)Against (3) |
1
|
2
|
3
|
Czechia PPE-DEFor (3)Against (2) |
1
|
Poland PPE-DEFor (8)Against (2) |
1
|
4
|
Sweden PPE-DEFor (1)Against (5) |
|
Verts/ALE |
35
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (9) |
France Verts/ALEFor (6) |
3
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
Netherlands Verts/ALE |
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||
NI |
23
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
United Kingdom NIFor (3)Against (2)Abstain (1) |
3
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
31
|
Germany GUE/NGLAbstain (1) |
3
|
1
|
Italy GUE/NGLAgainst (3)Abstain (3) |
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||
IND/DEM |
18
|
United Kingdom IND/DEMAgainst (5)Abstain (2) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||||||
UEN |
36
|
Italy UENFor (2)Against (4) |
2
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
Poland UENFor (4)Against (16)
Adam BIELAN,
Andrzej Tomasz ZAPAŁOWSKI,
Bogdan PĘK,
Bogusław ROGALSKI,
Ewa TOMASZEWSKA,
Hanna FOLTYN-KUBICKA,
Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI,
Konrad SZYMAŃSKI,
Leopold Józef RUTOWICZ,
Marcin LIBICKI,
Marek Aleksander CZARNECKI,
Mirosław PIOTROWSKI,
Ryszard CZARNECKI,
Wiesław Stefan KUC,
Zbigniew KUŹMIUK,
Zdzisław Zbigniew PODKAŃSKI
|
Rapport Mavrommatis A6-0149/2008 - ams. 15+35/1 #
DE | GB | CZ | NL | EL | IT | BE | LT | LV | BG | PL | FI | SI | ES | HU | FR | RO | IE | AT | LU | ?? | DK | EE | SK | SE | MT | CY | PT | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
77
|
67
|
19
|
23
|
19
|
55
|
21
|
10
|
8
|
16
|
45
|
12
|
7
|
45
|
21
|
57
|
17
|
11
|
15
|
4
|
2
|
12
|
5
|
13
|
16
|
4
|
3
|
19
|
|
PPE-DE |
230
|
Germany PPE-DEFor (37)Alexander RADWAN, Alfred GOMOLKA, Andreas SCHWAB, Angelika NIEBLER, Anja WEISGERBER, Christa KLASS, Christoph KONRAD, Daniel CASPARY, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Doris PACK, Elisabeth JEGGLE, Ewa KLAMT, Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, Hans-Peter MAYER, Hartmut NASSAUER, Herbert REUL, Horst POSDORF, Horst SCHNELLHARDT, Ingo FRIEDRICH, Karl von WOGAU, Karsten Friedrich HOPPENSTEDT, Klaus-Heiner LEHNE, Kurt Joachim LAUK, Kurt LECHNER, Lutz GOEPEL, Manfred WEBER, Markus FERBER, Markus PIEPER, Michael GAHLER, Rainer WIELAND, Reimer BÖGE, Renate SOMMER, Roland GEWALT, Rolf BEREND, Ruth HIERONYMI, Thomas MANN, Thomas ULMER
Against (1)Abstain (1) |
United Kingdom PPE-DEFor (21)Christopher HEATON-HARRIS, David SUMBERG, Den DOVER, Edward MCMILLAN-SCOTT, Giles CHICHESTER, James ELLES, James NICHOLSON, John PURVIS, Jonathan EVANS, Malcolm HARBOUR, Martin CALLANAN, Neil PARISH, Nirj DEVA, Philip BRADBOURN, Philip BUSHILL-MATTHEWS, Richard ASHWORTH, Robert STURDY, Sir Robert ATKINS, Struan STEVENSON, Syed KAMALL, Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK
Against (1) |
Czechia PPE-DEFor (13) |
Netherlands PPE-DEFor (6) |
Italy PPE-DEFor (14)Against (2)Abstain (1) |
Belgium PPE-DEFor (6) |
1
|
3
|
Bulgaria PPE-DE |
Poland PPE-DEFor (10)Against (1) |
Finland PPE-DEAgainst (1) |
4
|
Spain PPE-DEFor (19)Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA, Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS, Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE, Carlos ITURGAIZ, Carmen FRAGA ESTÉVEZ, Daniel VARELA SUANZES-CARPEGNA, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Fernando FERNÁNDEZ MARTÍN, Florencio LUQUE AGUILAR, Francisco José MILLÁN MON, Gerardo GALEOTE, Jaime MAYOR OREJA, José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA, José Javier POMÉS RUIZ, José Manuel GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL, Juan Andrés NARANJO ESCOBAR, Pilar AYUSO, Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA, Salvador Domingo SANZ PALACIO
|
Hungary PPE-DEFor (12) |
France PPE-DEFor (14)Against (1) |
Romania PPE-DEFor (6)Against (1) |
Ireland PPE-DEFor (2)Against (3) |
5
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Slovakia PPE-DEAgainst (2) |
Sweden PPE-DEAgainst (1) |
2
|
1
|
Portugal PPE-DEFor (5) |
|
ALDE |
81
|
Germany ALDEFor (6) |
United Kingdom ALDEFor (10) |
Netherlands ALDE |
Italy ALDEFor (10) |
4
|
Lithuania ALDEFor (6) |
1
|
3
|
Poland ALDEAgainst (1)Abstain (1) |
4
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
France ALDEFor (7) |
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
||||||
Verts/ALE |
35
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (8)Against (1) |
4
|
Netherlands Verts/ALE |
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
France Verts/ALEFor (6) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
29
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (3)Abstain (2) |
4
|
2
|
1
|
Italy GUE/NGLFor (3)Against (4) |
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
|||||||||||||||||
UEN |
36
|
Italy UENAgainst (4) |
2
|
3
|
Poland UENFor (10)Against (9) |
4
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
23
|
United Kingdom NIFor (3)Against (1)Abstain (2) |
1
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
|||||||||||||||||||
IND/DEM |
18
|
United Kingdom IND/DEMAgainst (1)Abstain (6) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||||||
PSE |
171
|
Germany PSEFor (1)Against (17) |
United Kingdom PSEFor (1)Against (16)Abstain (1) |
Netherlands PSEAgainst (5) |
Greece PSEAgainst (3) |
11
|
Belgium PSEAgainst (6) |
1
|
Bulgaria PSEAgainst (5) |
Poland PSEFor (1)Against (5) |
2
|
1
|
Spain PSEFor (1)Against (19)
Alejandro CERCAS,
Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO,
Antonio MASIP HIDALGO,
Carlos CARNERO GONZÁLEZ,
Emilio MENÉNDEZ del VALLE,
Enrique BARÓN CRESPO,
Inés AYALA SENDER,
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ,
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ,
Josep BORRELL FONTELLES,
Juan FRAILE CANTÓN,
Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA,
Manuel MEDINA ORTEGA,
Martí GRAU i SEGÚ,
María Isabel SALINAS GARCÍA,
Raimon OBIOLS,
Rosa MIGUÉLEZ RAMOS,
Teresa RIERA MADURELL,
Vicente Miguel GARCÉS RAMÓN
|
Hungary PSEAgainst (8) |
France PSEAgainst (22)
Anne FERREIRA,
Benoît HAMON,
Bernadette BOURZAI,
Bernadette VERGNAUD,
Brigitte DOUAY,
Béatrice PATRIE,
Catherine GUY-QUINT,
Catherine TRAUTMANN,
Françoise CASTEX,
Guy BONO,
Harlem DÉSIR,
Henri WEBER,
Jean Louis COTTIGNY,
Kader ARIF,
Marie-Arlette CARLOTTI,
Marie-Noëlle LIENEMANN,
Martine ROURE,
Michel ROCARD,
Pervenche BERÈS,
Pierre PRIBETICH,
Vincent PEILLON,
Yannick VAUGRENARD
|
Romania PSEFor (1)Against (6) |
Austria PSEAgainst (6) |
1
|
Denmark PSEAgainst (5) |
2
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
Portugal PSEAgainst (11) |
Rapport Mavrommatis A6-0149/2008 - ams. 15+35/2 #
PL | GB | LT | BG | IE | CZ | LV | AT | ?? | DK | NL | EE | LU | SE | ES | FI | CY | SI | MT | BE | RO | SK | IT | PT | EL | HU | FR | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
45
|
61
|
9
|
15
|
11
|
21
|
7
|
15
|
1
|
13
|
24
|
4
|
5
|
13
|
42
|
12
|
4
|
6
|
4
|
20
|
17
|
13
|
54
|
17
|
18
|
21
|
55
|
75
|
|
ALDE |
75
|
Poland ALDEFor (5) |
United Kingdom ALDEFor (8) |
Lithuania ALDEFor (6) |
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
Netherlands ALDE |
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
Italy ALDEFor (9) |
1
|
France ALDEFor (7) |
Germany ALDEFor (6) |
||||||
Verts/ALE |
33
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Netherlands Verts/ALE |
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
France Verts/ALEFor (6) |
Germany Verts/ALEFor (7) |
|||||||||||||||
UEN |
36
|
Poland UENFor (15)Andrzej Tomasz ZAPAŁOWSKI, Bogdan PĘK, Bogusław ROGALSKI, Dariusz Maciej GRABOWSKI, Hanna FOLTYN-KUBICKA, Jan Tadeusz MASIEL, Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI, Konrad SZYMAŃSKI, Leopold Józef RUTOWICZ, Marcin LIBICKI, Mieczysław Edmund JANOWSKI, Mirosław PIOTROWSKI, Ryszard CZARNECKI, Wojciech ROSZKOWSKI, Zdzisław Zbigniew PODKAŃSKI
Against (4) |
2
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
Italy UENAgainst (2)Abstain (1) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
29
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Italy GUE/NGLFor (2)Against (5) |
1
|
1
|
3
|
Germany GUE/NGLAbstain (2) |
|||||||||||||||||
NI |
21
|
1
|
United Kingdom NIFor (3)Against (1)Abstain (2) |
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
|||||||||||||||||||
IND/DEM |
17
|
3
|
United Kingdom IND/DEMAgainst (1)Abstain (6) |
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
PPE-DE |
224
|
Poland PPE-DEFor (10)Against (1) |
United Kingdom PPE-DEFor (18) |
1
|
Bulgaria PPE-DEAgainst (1) |
Ireland PPE-DEFor (2)Against (3) |
Czechia PPE-DEFor (7)Against (6) |
2
|
5
|
1
|
1
|
Netherlands PPE-DEAgainst (6) |
1
|
2
|
Sweden PPE-DEAgainst (1) |
Spain PPE-DEFor (14)Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA, Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS, Carlos ITURGAIZ, Carmen FRAGA ESTÉVEZ, Daniel VARELA SUANZES-CARPEGNA, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Fernando FERNÁNDEZ MARTÍN, Florencio LUQUE AGUILAR, Gerardo GALEOTE, Jaime MAYOR OREJA, José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA, José Manuel GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL, Juan Andrés NARANJO ESCOBAR, Salvador Domingo SANZ PALACIO
|
4
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
Belgium PPE-DEAgainst (6) |
Romania PPE-DEFor (1)Against (6) |
Slovakia PPE-DEAgainst (8) |
Italy PPE-DEFor (3)Against (13) |
Portugal PPE-DEFor (1) |
Hungary PPE-DEFor (1)Against (11) |
France PPE-DEFor (1)Against (14) |
Germany PPE-DEFor (1)Against (39)
Alexander RADWAN,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Anja WEISGERBER,
Christa KLASS,
Christoph KONRAD,
Daniel CASPARY,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Doris PACK,
Elisabeth JEGGLE,
Ewa KLAMT,
Georg JARZEMBOWSKI,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Hans-Peter MAYER,
Hartmut NASSAUER,
Herbert REUL,
Horst POSDORF,
Horst SCHNELLHARDT,
Ingo FRIEDRICH,
Karl von WOGAU,
Karsten Friedrich HOPPENSTEDT,
Klaus-Heiner LEHNE,
Kurt Joachim LAUK,
Kurt LECHNER,
Lutz GOEPEL,
Manfred WEBER,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Reimer BÖGE,
Renate SOMMER,
Roland GEWALT,
Rolf BEREND,
Ruth HIERONYMI,
Thomas MANN,
Thomas ULMER,
Werner LANGEN
|
|
PSE |
167
|
Poland PSEAgainst (6) |
United Kingdom PSEAgainst (17)Abstain (1) |
4
|
2
|
Austria PSEAgainst (6) |
Denmark PSEAgainst (5) |
Netherlands PSEAgainst (6) |
1
|
1
|
4
|
Spain PSEAgainst (18)
Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO,
Antonio MASIP HIDALGO,
Carlos CARNERO GONZÁLEZ,
Emilio MENÉNDEZ del VALLE,
Enrique BARÓN CRESPO,
Inés AYALA SENDER,
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ,
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ,
Juan FRAILE CANTÓN,
Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA,
Manuel MEDINA ORTEGA,
Martí GRAU i SEGÚ,
María Isabel SALINAS GARCÍA,
Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ,
Raimon OBIOLS,
Rosa MIGUÉLEZ RAMOS,
Teresa RIERA MADURELL,
Vicente Miguel GARCÉS RAMÓN
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
Belgium PSEAgainst (7) |
Romania PSEAgainst (7) |
3
|
11
|
Portugal PSEAgainst (11) |
Greece PSEAgainst (6) |
Hungary PSEFor (1)Against (7) |
France PSEAgainst (21)
Anne FERREIRA,
Benoît HAMON,
Bernadette BOURZAI,
Bernadette VERGNAUD,
Brigitte DOUAY,
Béatrice PATRIE,
Catherine GUY-QUINT,
Catherine TRAUTMANN,
Françoise CASTEX,
Guy BONO,
Harlem DÉSIR,
Henri WEBER,
Jean Louis COTTIGNY,
Kader ARIF,
Marie-Arlette CARLOTTI,
Marie-Noëlle LIENEMANN,
Martine ROURE,
Michel ROCARD,
Pierre PRIBETICH,
Vincent PEILLON,
Yannick VAUGRENARD
|
Germany PSEAgainst (16) |
Rapport Mavrommatis A6-0149/2008 - par. 33 #
Rapport Mavrommatis A6-0149/2008 - par. 42 #
Rapport Mavrommatis A6-0149/2008 - par. 100 #
Rapport Mavrommatis A6-0149/2008 - par. 102 #
DE | IT | FR | ES | BE | HU | EL | BG | RO | PT | NL | AT | FI | SK | DK | IE | LV | SI | LT | PL | SE | EE | LU | MT | CY | CZ | ?? | GB | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
73
|
53
|
47
|
41
|
19
|
17
|
17
|
15
|
15
|
17
|
22
|
14
|
13
|
12
|
12
|
11
|
8
|
7
|
10
|
44
|
16
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
17
|
2
|
58
|
|
PPE-DE |
215
|
Germany PPE-DEFor (35)Alexander RADWAN, Alfred GOMOLKA, Angelika NIEBLER, Anja WEISGERBER, Christa KLASS, Christoph KONRAD, Daniel CASPARY, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Doris PACK, Elisabeth JEGGLE, Ewa KLAMT, Georg JARZEMBOWSKI, Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, Hans-Peter MAYER, Hartmut NASSAUER, Herbert REUL, Horst POSDORF, Horst SCHNELLHARDT, Ingo FRIEDRICH, Karl von WOGAU, Karsten Friedrich HOPPENSTEDT, Klaus-Heiner LEHNE, Kurt Joachim LAUK, Kurt LECHNER, Lutz GOEPEL, Manfred WEBER, Markus FERBER, Markus PIEPER, Michael GAHLER, Reimer BÖGE, Roland GEWALT, Rolf BEREND, Ruth HIERONYMI, Thomas MANN, Thomas ULMER
|
Italy PPE-DEFor (18) |
13
|
Spain PPE-DEFor (18)Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA, Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS, Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE, Carlos ITURGAIZ, Carmen FRAGA ESTÉVEZ, Daniel VARELA SUANZES-CARPEGNA, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Fernando FERNÁNDEZ MARTÍN, Florencio LUQUE AGUILAR, Francisco José MILLÁN MON, Gerardo GALEOTE, Jaime MAYOR OREJA, José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA, José Manuel GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL, Juan Andrés NARANJO ESCOBAR, Pilar AYUSO, Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA, Salvador Domingo SANZ PALACIO
|
Belgium PPE-DEFor (6) |
Hungary PPE-DEFor (11) |
Bulgaria PPE-DE |
Romania PPE-DEFor (6) |
Portugal PPE-DEFor (5) |
Netherlands PPE-DEFor (6) |
5
|
4
|
Slovakia PPE-DEFor (7) |
1
|
5
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
Poland PPE-DEFor (9)Against (1) |
Sweden PPE-DEAgainst (1) |
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
Czechia PPE-DEFor (3)Against (1)Abstain (7) |
1
|
United Kingdom PPE-DEAgainst (19)
Christopher HEATON-HARRIS,
David SUMBERG,
Den DOVER,
Giles CHICHESTER,
James ELLES,
John BOWIS,
John PURVIS,
Jonathan EVANS,
Malcolm HARBOUR,
Martin CALLANAN,
Neil PARISH,
Nirj DEVA,
Philip BUSHILL-MATTHEWS,
Richard ASHWORTH,
Robert STURDY,
Sir Robert ATKINS,
Struan STEVENSON,
Syed KAMALL,
Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK
|
|
PSE |
155
|
17
|
France PSEFor (17) |
Spain PSEFor (18)Alejandro CERCAS, Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO, Antonio MASIP HIDALGO, Carlos CARNERO GONZÁLEZ, Emilio MENÉNDEZ del VALLE, Enrique BARÓN CRESPO, Inés AYALA SENDER, Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ, Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ, Juan FRAILE CANTÓN, Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA, Manuel MEDINA ORTEGA, Martí GRAU i SEGÚ, María Isabel SALINAS GARCÍA, Raimon OBIOLS, Rosa MIGUÉLEZ RAMOS, Teresa RIERA MADURELL, Vicente Miguel GARCÉS RAMÓN
|
Belgium PSEFor (6) |
Hungary PSE |
Greece PSEFor (6) |
Bulgaria PSE |
Romania PSEFor (6) |
10
|
4
|
5
|
3
|
3
|
Denmark PSE |
1
|
1
|
Poland PSEFor (6) |
4
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
United Kingdom PSEFor (17) |
|||||
ALDE |
76
|
Germany ALDEFor (7) |
Italy ALDEFor (9) |
France ALDEFor (7) |
2
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Netherlands ALDE |
1
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Lithuania ALDEFor (6) |
Poland ALDEFor (5) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom ALDEFor (7)Abstain (1) |
||||||
Verts/ALE |
33
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (9) |
2
|
France Verts/ALEFor (6) |
2
|
2
|
Netherlands Verts/ALE |
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
||||||||||||||||
UEN |
36
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
Poland UENFor (5)Against (14) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
27
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (3)Abstain (2) |
Italy GUE/NGLAbstain (5) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
||||||||||||||||
NI |
17
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
United Kingdom NIAgainst (4)Abstain (1) |
||||||||||||||||||||
IND/DEM |
17
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom IND/DEMAgainst (6) |
Rapport Mavrommatis A6-0149/2008 - cons. D #
Rapport Mavrommatis A6-0149/2008 - cons. E #
Rapport Mavrommatis A6-0149/2008 - cons. I #
Rapport Mavrommatis A6-0149/2008 - am. 27/1 #
Rapport Mavrommatis A6-0149/2008 - am. 27/2 #
Rapport Mavrommatis A6-0149/2008 - résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
97 |
2007/2261(INI)
2008/03/06
LIBE
15 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to implement an ‘intelligence-led policy’ of cross-border police cooperation in the field of sport, including the exchange of information and intelligence between security services, while ensuring respect for freedom, fundamental rights and data protection rules;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Underlines the need for a serious monitoring of the enforcement of legislation on racism and xenophobia within the framework of sport events; urges the Commission and the Member States to incorporate measures into their policies which will promote values such as solidarity, tolerance and non- discrimination;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Underlines the need for
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Underlines the need for a serious monitoring of the enforcement of legislation on racism, xenophobia and any other kind of violence and discrimination within the framework of sport events;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls upon the Member States to incorporate gender mainstreaming at all stages of sports policies with a view to a steady narrowing of the gap which still exists between men and women in terms of representation within sports bodies, financial reward and actual involvement in sport, so that both sexes can derive the same personal and social benefit from sport;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Welcomes the development of club licensing systems at national and European level and believes that such systems should also include provisions related to the prevention of racism, xenophobia and violence
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Underlines the
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out that sport (and, in particular, certain forms of sport which have already been professionalised) have become or are becoming a global business forming part of a global market and the globalisation process;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1b (new) 1b. Points out that that globalisation is altering relations between those involved in sport and bringing new situations into being, and that the Member States adopt different approaches to the new challenges, for which reason there is a need for sound, consistent political and legislative solutions which are consonant with the EU’s basic principles and values and with all that is set out in the EU Treaties;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines the need to create - besides preventive, dissuasive and repressive measures - the conditions for a more comprehensive approach
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Draws particular attention to the valuable experience gained through the NFIP (National Football Information Points, responsible for coordinating and facilitating cross-border police information exchange, including risk assessments and data on high-risk supporters) and the handbook for international police cooperation, which can play a key role in this ‘intelligence-led policy’; and calls on the Commission and the Member States to cooperate more extensively and further develop and update this approach where necessary;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Strongly urges the Member States and all organisations and institutions with sports responsibilities to increase their efforts in the fight against the use, supply and sales of illegal doping products;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to take all relevant
source: PE-402.796
2008/03/07
ECON
82 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Supports the Commission’s conclusions, in particular that sport is a fast-growing sector with an underestimated macro- economic impact, and can contribute to the Lisbon objectives of growth and jobs creation; underlines the extensive impact that sport has on other economic and social activities;
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that professional and non- professional sport
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Points out that, although the existing Treaty does not contain provisions conferring specific competence for sport, sport is not excluded from the scope of Community law, and is covered more specifically in terms of the ban on discrimination (Article 12 of the Treaty), free movement of workers (Article 39), freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services (Articles 43 and 49) and the competition rules (Articles 81 to 87); further points out that the provisions on employment
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Believes that sport cannot be categorised as an normal economic activity because of its specific, unique and inherent aspects and thus calls on the Commission to recognise that EC competition law is relevant only to the economic activities of sporting organisations;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Believes the Supporters Direct model serves as a best example in this respect and calls on the Commission, the Member States and the governing bodies to promote its dissemination;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Takes the view that simply relying on the Court of Justice to rule in the last resort produces an unsatisfactory case-by-case approach, and a lack of legal certainty, especially since the reasoning in the case- law is not invariably clear or consistent, as witness the line of cases from Walrave to Meca-Medina; notes the complexity of separating commercial competition aspects from purely sporting matters, which is such that some matters do have to be dealt with on a case-by-case basis, and therefore opposes any moves seeking block exemption from the competition rules laid down by Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission to ensure more funding for sport-related projects within the existing programmes, as well as to provide new funding instruments aimed at sport-related issues;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Points out that as the televised broadcasting of sports competitions is increasingly taking place on encrypted and prepaid channels,
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Urges the Commission to make it clear to the relevant bodies, organisations and federations of sports associations and disciplines the ascendancy of Community law in the areas covered by the rules referred to in paragraph 1 of the opinion and to clarify the legal aspects of this relationship;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Calls on the Member States to include high in their sustainable development strategies support for sport at the grassroots level including support for initiatives and the development of related infrastructure;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Points out that as the televised broadcasting of sports competitions is
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes that recognition of players' agents' professional qualifications is covered by Directive 2005/36/EC1 where the profession is subject to national rules; 1 OJ L 255, 30.9.2005, p. 22.
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls for a percentage of the revenue generated by the sale of media rights and market ventures relating to a particular sport to be allocated directly to funding and aiding the volunteer and non-profit sectors of that sport;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Supports the principle of the collective sale of television broadcasting rights,
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Considers that illicit practices on the part of some players' agents (corruption, money laundering, trafficking in under- age players) could warrant adoption of a legislative act laying down minimum professional requirements for players' agents (knowledge of specific subjects, respectability, no conflict of interests, e.g. as a result of dual representation, etc.);
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Welcomes the Commission’s acknowledgement of the particular challenges faced by amateur and non- profit sport and by sport dependent on volunteering and calls for this to be reflected in all economic aspects of future sports policy;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Supports the principle of the collective sale of
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Strongly supports the UEFA club licensing system and calls for the Europe- wide adoption of such best practices;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Takes the view that sport broadcasts should be accessible to as many people as possible through free-to-air channels, in accordance with Article 3j of Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 19891 (Audiovisual Media); 1 OJ L 298, 17.10.1989, p. 23. Last amended by Directive 2007/65/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 11 December 2007 (OJ L 332, 18.12.2007, p. 27).
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Supports the principle of the collective sale of
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 d (new) Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the Commission understands the importance of public support for grassroots sport and sport for all and, therefore, calls on the Commission to
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Underlines the necessity for better control of the sports betting market and preservation of sport’s integrity, asks the Commission to come forward with a proposal ensuring a functioning sports betting market in the European Union on the basis of a State or State-controlled licensing system, providing for Member States to take necessary and appropriate measures against compulsive gambling, respecting the sport event organisers’ rights
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 4.
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the Commission understands the importance of public support for grassroots sport and sport for all and, therefore, calls on the Commission to develop clear guidelines on the application of EC competition and internal market law (such as state aid rules), indicating what kind of public funding can be supported in order to fulfil the social, cultural and educational role played by sport; notes also that the protection and promotion of sport have constitutional status in some Member States, whence the requirement to guarantee the operational viability of sport;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Underlines the necessity for better control of the sports betting market
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Draws attention to the fact that, with the growth of on-line gaming and the
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Points out that the link between sport and health is an important consideration, so that cooperation between sports organisations or associations and health funds and doctors has become an increasingly common practice which represents an enormous added value for health care services and, at the same time, a financial saving;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Underlines the necessity for better control of the sports betting market, asks the Commission to come forward with a proposal ensuring a functioning sports betting market in the European Union respecting the sport event organisers rights and preventing misuse and corruption;·at the same time calls for adoption of a strict legislative framework of sanctions in the event of illicit activities being detected; ·
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Draws attention to the fact that, with the growth of on-line gaming and the Commission's efforts to liberalise the sector, it is also necessary to ensure betting integrity and deal with the question of compliance with intellectual property rights in connection in particular with on- line gaming
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to develop clear guidelines for an application of EU competition and single market law that takes account of the specificity of sport;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Asks the Commission and the Member States to explore with sport and betting operators the creation of a workable, equitable and sustainable framework to ensure that all sports in Europe remain free from illegal betting behaviour and retain public confidence in the integrity of sport;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses its concern at the growing incidence of violence and racism – at national and cross-border level – at organised sports events; notes the unenforceability and ineffectiveness of the penalties for such actions under the existing bodies of legislation in the EU Member States and calls on the Commission to take fresh initiatives to develop a coordinated approach and counterstrategy;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Supports the Commission’s proposals concerning the economic dimension of sport; points also in this connection to the considerable importance of sport in social and societal terms;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes that existing structures of sport in Europe are based on the principle of nationality;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Notes that the EU institutions have no legal obligation to recognise the specificity of sport when they apply the provisions of the Treaty, and that, as a consequence, the very notion of specificity remains vulnerable to the fluctuating decisions of the courts;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to come forward with
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Specifically asks the Commission and the Member States to explore with sport and betting operators the creation of a workable, equitable and sustainable framework to ensure that all sports in Europe remain free from the pollution of illegal betting and retain the trust of the European sporting public;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to help maintain, in the interest of putting the financing of non-professional sport on a secure footing, the current system of public funding of non-professional sport by contributions from state-run lotteries and other nationally licensed organisations that operate games of chance for the public benefit;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Acknowledges the right of the Member States to take measures to protect the right to information and to ensure wide access by the public to television coverage of national or non-national sport events of major importance for society, such as the Olympic Games, the football World Cup and the UEFA European Football Championship;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Welcomes Commission’s intention to maintain the existing possibilities for VAT reduction and calls on the Commission to encourage Member States to provide further financial incentives for sport;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Agrees with the Commission proposal that it should be possible for the players’ transfer system to be managed by the relevant European sport organisation or the national authorities; considers, however, that an independent European certification body for information and verification should be set up and should work closely with these existing authorities.
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Emphasises the rapidly changing nature of the European sport economy, which is increasingly based on investment in and development of innovative sports content through digital technologies; recognises the need to prevent the undermining of intellectual property rights and goodwill, to minimise piracy and to reduce the scope for illegal operations in online environments;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Points out that the differing tax systems in application in the Member States can have distorting effects on competition;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Expresses concern at the – sometimes systematic – erosion of copyright by users of social networking sites; recognises the exciting development of “user-generated” content, but also the increased risk of copyright abuse; considers that, where technology permits embedded or attached identification of a copyright indication, it is not unreasonable to require filtering to detect such an indication by the service providers of the sites as well as more pro- active takedown procedures; considers, however, that some standardisation of the technology is desirable in order to prevent the filtering requirement from being over- burdensome;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Notes that recent judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, in particular Meca- Medina1, have seriously undermined the status of sporting rules that are designed to ensure fair play and open competition; 1 Case C-519/04 P, Meca-Medina and Majcen v. Commission, [2006] ECR I-6991.
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 d (new) 4d. Recognises legitimate concerns of sports organisations regarding 'ambush marketing'; notes in this context that trademark and copyright law may not always be wide enough to prevent this parasitic practice; observes that review of the provisions of 'passing off' law, available in some Member States, may indicate ways forward for possible remedies;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Asks the Commission and the Member States to consider how Article 149 of the EC Treaty, as amended by the Lisbon Treaty, could contribute to a clearer and more consistent recognition of the specificity of sport, which would be endorsed by the Court of Justice;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Emphasises the importance of funding physical activity in schools, which is fundamental to the psychological and physical growth of the youngest children, as well as being a major healthcare instrument for the young and less young;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Supports the Commission’s proposals
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recognises that professional sport must comply with rules emanating from multiple sources (EC, Member
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Opposes setting up an additional agency at EU level in the form of an EU sports agency and regards the existing national and international decision-
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Expresses its support for the club licensing systems introduced to football in 2004, which promote competitive balance and deliver financial stability for clubs; calls for the further development and implementation of such systems in other sports in order to promote best practices and good governance in sport in conformity with EU law;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Repeats its previous call (
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Repeats its previous call (apropos of football) for the Commission to take action concerning betting and sport
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Takes the view that sport can be supported just as effectively without state gambling monopolies;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Expresses concern at the growth of advertising linking sports and alcohol that is directed at young people and recommends that while sporting organisations are free to use advertisers and sponsors from all sections of the industry, special consideration should be given to sporting advertising aimed at young people;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on Member States to adopt regulatory measures which ensure that sport is protected from any improper influence associated with betting; believes that there is a particular need to reduce betting opportunities and address the risk of conflict between the economic interests of a betting company and sporting results; calls on Member States to prohibit the ownership or commercial involvement (e.g. sponsorship) of sports clubs by betting companies as well as links of betting companies with a particular sportsperson, unless the betting companies exclude that club or sportsperson from their sports betting offer;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls in addition for an appropriate assessment of the role of sport in the light of its fundamental importance in terms of health, childrearing, education, social integration and culture in European society; points in particular, in this context, to the voluntary input in this area and the outstanding contribution this makes to economic and social cohesion;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recognises that professional sport must comply with rules emanating from multiple sources (EC, Member
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Emphasises the rapidly changing nature of the European sport economy which is increasingly based on investment in and development of innovative sport content through digital technologies; recognises the need to prevent the undermining of intellectual property rights and goodwill, to minimise piracy and reduce the scope for illegal operations on the Internet;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the recurrence of legal challenges to the structures and rules of sport and of illicit practices by certain agents has created great concern, while
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Welcomes Commission’s initiative to develop a European statistical method for measuring the economic impact of sport and asks the Commission to establish a clear time line for implementation;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Notes that case-law has to a large extent shaped the legal environment in which professional sport operates
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that, in view of the unique characteristics of sport, the Commission should consider, after consulting the various interests concerned and Parliament, the adoption of interpretative guidelines
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Notes that case-law has to a large extent shaped the legal environment in which professional sport operates, but that
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that, in view of the unique characteristics of sport, the Commission should consider, after consulting the various interests concerned and Parliament, on the one hand, codification of the Community acquis regarding sport and, on the other hand, the adoption of interpretative guidelines designed to clarify the whole question of the relationship between Community law and "sporting rules" that do not fall within the remit of that law and the area to which
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that commercial contracts concerning intellectual property associated with sport (including those incorporating the sale of television and new media rights concerning a sport) should always fully comply with EC competition law and be negotiated and completed in a transparent manner; but subject to this believes that sport broadcasts should be accessible t
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Notes that there is often a mismatch between supply and demand of tickets for major sport events which is detrimental to consumers; stresses that the interests of consumers should be fully taken into account when organizing the distribution of tickets and that non-discriminatory and fair ticket sales should be guaranteed at all levels;· calls on sports bodies and organisations, fans, consumers and in general all interested parties to use electronic means to distribute tickets for sports events promptly, reliably and more rationally;·
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Asks the sporting organisations to accept the right of recourse to ordinary courts while recognising the principle of self-regulation in sport, the structures of the European Sports model and the principles governing the organisation of sporting competitions;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes the complexity of separating competition law aspects from purely sporting aspects, so that certain situations have to be dealt with on a case-by-case basis; therefore opposes any moves towards establishing a block exemption for sport as regards the EC competition rules;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Asks Member States and sports governing bodies to actively promote the social and democratic role of fans by supporting the creation and development of supporters' federations and promoting their involvement in the management and administration of the game;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 source: PE-402.908
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0932/COM_SEC(2007)0932_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0932/COM_SEC(2007)0932_EN.pdf |
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0935/COM_SEC(2007)0935_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0935/COM_SEC(2007)0935_EN.pdf |
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE398.653&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AD-398653_EN.html |
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE400.386&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-400386_EN.html |
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE398.681&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-398681_EN.html |
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE400.484&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-400484_EN.html |
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE400.541&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-400541_EN.html |
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE400.666&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AD-400666_EN.html |
docs/13 |
|
docs/13/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE402.497&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-402497_EN.html |
docs/15 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/16/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14892&j=0&l=enNew
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14892&j=1&l=en |
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0934/COM_SEC(2007)0934_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0934/COM_SEC(2007)0934_EN.pdf |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0935/COM_SEC(2007)0935_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0935/COM_SEC(2007)0935_EN.pdf |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE398.399New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE398.399 |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.553New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE400.553 |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE398.653&secondRef=02New
http://nullEN&reference=PE398.653&secondRef=02 |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.386&secondRef=02New
http://nullEN&reference=PE400.386&secondRef=02 |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE398.681&secondRef=03New
http://nullEN&reference=PE398.681&secondRef=03 |
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.484&secondRef=03New
http://nullEN&reference=PE400.484&secondRef=03 |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.541&secondRef=02New
http://nullEN&reference=PE400.541&secondRef=02 |
docs/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.666&secondRef=02New
http://nullEN&reference=PE400.666&secondRef=02 |
docs/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE402.497&secondRef=02New
http://nullEN&reference=PE402.497&secondRef=02 |
docs/13/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0149_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0149_EN.html |
docs/14/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14892&j=1&l=en
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0391/COM_COM(2007)0391_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0391/COM_COM(2007)0391_EN.pdf |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080508&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20080508&type=CRE |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0934/COM_SEC(2007)0934_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0934/COM_SEC(2007)0934_EN.pdf |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0935/COM_SEC(2007)0935_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0935/COM_SEC(2007)0935_EN.pdf |
docs/13/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-149&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0149_EN.html |
docs/14/body |
EC
|
docs/15/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0391/COM_COM(2007)0391_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0391/COM_COM(2007)0391_EN.pdf |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-149&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0149_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-198New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0198_EN.html |
committees/4/rapporteur/0/mepref |
4560
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CULT/6/55895New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/title |
Old
White Paper on SportNew
White Paper on sport |
procedure/subject/0 |
Old
4.10.13 SportsNew
4.10.13 Sport |
activities/1/committees/7/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
545fcd88d1d1c52175000000New
4f1ad236b819f27595000010 |
activities/2/committees/7/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
545fcd88d1d1c52175000000New
4f1ad236b819f27595000010 |
committees/7/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
545fcd88d1d1c52175000000New
4f1ad236b819f27595000010 |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|