Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ENVI | SCHLYTER Carl ( Verts/ALE) | |
Committee Opinion | IMCO |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 095
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 095Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to restrict the sale and use of paint strippers containing Dichloromethane.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision No 455/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 76/769/EEC as regards restrictions on the marketing and use of dichloromethane.
CONTENT: following a first reading agreement between Parliament and Council, this Decision imposes a ban on the supply to consumers of paint strippers containing dichloromethane (DCM), which is commonly used for domestic purposes to remove paints, varnishes and lacquers. It also imposes restrictions better to control and reduce the risks involved in industrial and professional uses.
The risks posed to human health by dichloromethane (DCM) in paint strippers were assessed in several studies which concluded that risk reduction measures were required throughout the Community to reduce the risks posed to human health during the application of DCM at industrial, professional and consumer levels.
Accordingly, paint strippers containing dichloromethane in a concentration equal to or greater than 0.1% by weight shall not be:
placed on the market for the first time for supply to the general public or to professionals after 6 December 2010; placed on the market for supply to the general public or to professionals after 6 December 2011; used by professionals after 6 June 2012.
However, by way of derogation, Member States may allow specifically trained professionals to use paint strippers containing dichloromethane and may allow the placing on the market of such paint strippers for supply to those professionals. Member States making use of this derogation must ensure that a professional holds a certificate demonstrating proper training and competence to use paint strippers containing dichloromethane safely. The Decision sets out the minimum criteria for appropriate training.
Paint strippers containing dichloromethane in concentrations equal to or greater than 0.1% by weight may be used in industrial installations only if as a minimum certain prescribed conditions are met. These include effective ventilation in all processing areas and personal protective equipment that complies with Directive 89/686/EEC.
The Decision modifies Council Directive 76/769/EEC on restrictions in the marketing of dangerous substances.
ENTRY INTO FORCE : 06/06/2009
The European Parliament adopted by 674 votes to 17 with 8 abstentions, a legislative resolution amending the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 76/769/EEC as regards restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (Dichloromethane).
The report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Carl SCHLYTER (Greens/ALE, SE) on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety.
The amendments were the result of a compromise between Parliament and Council. They ensure that a derogation for licensed professionals will be limited and that the protection of workers during the industrial use of paint-strippers containing the chemical will be strengthened.
The main amendments - adopted under 1st reading of the codecision procedure - were as follows:
Prohibition on use : paint strippers containing Dichloromethane in a concentration equal to or greater than 0.1% by mass will not be: (a) placed on the market for the first time for supply to the general public or to professionals 18 months after the entry into force of the Decision; (b) placed on the market for supply to the general public or to professionals 30 months after the entry into force of the Decision; (c) used by professionals 36 months after the entry into force of the Decision.
Derogation : by way of derogation Member States may allow on their territories and for certain activities the use by specifically trained professionals of paint strippers containing Dichloromethane and may allow the placing on the market of such paint strippers for supply to those professionals. A professional benefiting from this derogation shall operate only in Member States which have made use of that derogation
Member States making use of this derogation must define appropriate provisions for the protection of the health and safety of those professionals using paint strippers containing Dichloromethane and inform the Commission thereof. Those provisions must include a requirement that a professional shall hold a certificate that is accepted by the Member State in which he operates, or provide other documentary evidence to that effect, or be otherwise approved by that Member State, so as to demonstrate that he is properly trained and competent to safely use paint strippers containing Dichloromethane. The Commission will prepare a list of the Member States that have made use of this derogation and make it publicly available over the Internet.
Industrial installations : paint strippers containing Dichloromethane in concentrations equal to or greater than 0.1% by mass may be used in industrial installations only if as a minimum certain prescribed conditions are met. These conditions include effective ventilation in all processing areas; specified measures to minimise evaporation from strip tanks; specified measures for the safe handling of Dichloromethane in strip tanks; the availability of specific personal protective equipment; and adequate information, instruction and training in the use of such equipment is provided to operators.
Training : the compromise text lays down the minimum training requirements, which include awareness, evaluation and management of risks to health, including information on existing substitutes or processes, which under their conditions of use are less hazardous to workers' health and safety.
Employers and self-employed workers shall by preference replace Dichloromethane with a chemical agent or process which, under its conditions of use, presents no risk, or a lower risk, to workers" health and safety. The professional shall apply all relevant safety measures in practice including the use of personal protective equipment.
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted a report drafted by Carl SCHLYTER (Greens/ALE, SE) and amended the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 76/769/EEC as regards restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (Dichloromethane). The committee wants a total ban on dichloromethane-based paint strippers, including for licensed professionals.
The main amendments – made in 1st reading of codecision procedure – are as follows :
Recitals: these have been considerably expanded in order to clarify the purposes and provisions of the legislation. Members note that dichloromethane (DCM) is being used in very high concentration in paint stripping products. It is very volatile and has a narcotic effect leading to depression of the central nervous system and to cardio-toxicological effects at high exposure, with a direct risk of death as a result of misuse. Alternatives to DCM with a much better human health and environmental hazard and risk profile are available.
Prohibition of DCM for professional use : the committee also notes in the recitals that professional use of DCM-based paint strippers regularly exceeds occupational exposure limits (OELs), despite good ventilation, and even when used outdoors. Compliance with the OELs is practically non-existent, as users lack adequate measuring equipment and do not make use of adequate personal protection measures. Enforcement of the OELs is inherently inadequate due to the large number, small size and mobile nature of the enterprises involved. Accordingly, DCM should be completely banned also for licensed professionals. The committee deleted the derogation which authorised the supply of paint strippers containing dichloromethane to licensed professionals. It also deleted the clauses on training for professionals, stating that training will not rectify problems of non-compliance.
Limit values for industrial use : Members point out that in November 2007, the Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits recommended limit values for an eight hour Time Weighted Average and for a 15 minute Short Term Exposure Level. It is appropriate to establish these levels as maximum limits that are to be achieved by effective exhaust ventilation for industrial use, without prejudice to any lower levels set pursuant to national legislation. Accordingly, paint strippers containing dichloromethane in concentrations equal to or greater than 0.1% by mass may be used in industrial installations only if the following conditions are met : a) operation of effective exhaust ventilation proven to ensure full compliance with national occupational exposure limits that shall not exceed 100 ppm (353 mg/m3) for an eight hour Time Weighted Average or 200 ppm (706 mg/m3) for a 15 minute Short Term Exposure Level, or proven use of respiratory protective equipment with an independent air supply; (b) all strip tanks covered when not in use; (ba) separate ventilated area for the drying of stripped articles ; (c) appropriate protective gloves and masks for operators. Members stressed that, in order to reduce exposure to DCM in industrial use as much as possible, the drying of stripped articles should take place in separate ventilated areas.
Labelling : a new recital notes that, as professionals may have access to DCM-based paint stripper despite the ban through the distribution chain intended for industrial users, a warning phrase should be included on the product. The committee strengthened the wording on packaging and labelling provisions. Paint strippers containing more than 0.1% by mass of dichloromethane shall be legibly and indelibly marked as follows: "Dangerous! Reserved for industrial uses only". The Commission had proposed "Reserved for industrial and professional uses".
PURPOSE: to restrict the sale and use of paint strippers containing Dichloromethane.
PROPOSED ACT: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: Dichloromethane (DCM), CAS number 75-09-2 and EINECS number 200-838-9, is a colourless, halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbon compound with a penetrating ether-like or mild sweet odour. It is mainly used in the production of pharmaceuticals, solvent and auxiliary applications, paint strippers manufacture and adhesives.
The risks posed to human health by Dichloromethane (DCM) in paint strippers have been assessed in several studies which concluded that risk reduction measures are required throughout the EU to reduce the risks posed to human health during the application of DCM at industrial, professional and consumer level. The results of those studies were evaluated by the Commission’s Scientific Committee on Toxicity, Ecotoxicity and the Environment (CSTEE - later named SCHER), which confirmed that the exposure to DCM released from paint strippers is of concern for human health.
During the last four years discussions have taken place between the Commission, Member States and other stakeholders. Despite strongly divergent opinions on the risks associated with DCM and on the safety of alternatives, an agreement has been reached on the need for marketing and use restrictions at Community level under Council Directive 76/769/EEC to limit the risks from DCM.
CONTENT: the main aspects of the proposal are:
- due to the fact that there is a need for limiting the risks during industrial, professional and consumer uses of DCM-based paint strippers, certain restrictions on placing on the market and use should be applied. The present Decision would amend Annex I to Directive 76/769/EEC by adding Dichloromethane, which will ensure harmonised rules applied at Community wide level.
- for the activities conducted in industrial installations some mandatory requirements should be applied, in order to increase the protection of workers, such as: the use of appropriate protective gloves, the installation of local ventilation or independent air supply respiratory protective equipment, and modification of the strip tanks, to ensure reduction of exposure of workers.
- professional uses should be banned in general, but Member States could opt to allow further use on their territories by specifically licensed professionals for those activities where they believe that the replacement of DCM is particularly difficult or inappropriate. Licenses should be subject to specific training requirements.
- lastly, a total ban of the placing on the market of paint strippers containing DCM for consumer uses should be applied as this is the only effective measure to eliminate the risks.
PURPOSE: to restrict the sale and use of paint strippers containing Dichloromethane.
PROPOSED ACT: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: Dichloromethane (DCM), CAS number 75-09-2 and EINECS number 200-838-9, is a colourless, halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbon compound with a penetrating ether-like or mild sweet odour. It is mainly used in the production of pharmaceuticals, solvent and auxiliary applications, paint strippers manufacture and adhesives.
The risks posed to human health by Dichloromethane (DCM) in paint strippers have been assessed in several studies which concluded that risk reduction measures are required throughout the EU to reduce the risks posed to human health during the application of DCM at industrial, professional and consumer level. The results of those studies were evaluated by the Commission’s Scientific Committee on Toxicity, Ecotoxicity and the Environment (CSTEE - later named SCHER), which confirmed that the exposure to DCM released from paint strippers is of concern for human health.
During the last four years discussions have taken place between the Commission, Member States and other stakeholders. Despite strongly divergent opinions on the risks associated with DCM and on the safety of alternatives, an agreement has been reached on the need for marketing and use restrictions at Community level under Council Directive 76/769/EEC to limit the risks from DCM.
CONTENT: the main aspects of the proposal are:
- due to the fact that there is a need for limiting the risks during industrial, professional and consumer uses of DCM-based paint strippers, certain restrictions on placing on the market and use should be applied. The present Decision would amend Annex I to Directive 76/769/EEC by adding Dichloromethane, which will ensure harmonised rules applied at Community wide level.
- for the activities conducted in industrial installations some mandatory requirements should be applied, in order to increase the protection of workers, such as: the use of appropriate protective gloves, the installation of local ventilation or independent air supply respiratory protective equipment, and modification of the strip tanks, to ensure reduction of exposure of workers.
- professional uses should be banned in general, but Member States could opt to allow further use on their territories by specifically licensed professionals for those activities where they believe that the replacement of DCM is particularly difficult or inappropriate. Licenses should be subject to specific training requirements.
- lastly, a total ban of the placing on the market of paint strippers containing DCM for consumer uses should be applied as this is the only effective measure to eliminate the risks.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Decision 2009/455
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 137 03.06.2009, p. 0003
- Draft final act: 03610/2009/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)693
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T6-0017/2009
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES1504/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0341/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A6-0341/2008
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE409.588
- Committee draft report: PE407.937
- Legislative proposal: COM(2008)0080
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)0192
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)0193
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2008)0080
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: COM(2008)0080 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)0192 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)0193 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE407.937
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE409.588
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0341/2008
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES1504/2008
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)693
- Draft final act: 03610/2009/LEX
Activities
- Luca ROMAGNOLI
Plenary Speeches (8)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Zuzana ROITHOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (7)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Dangerous substances and preparations (dichloromethane) (debate)
- Koenraad DILLEN
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alessandro BATTILOCCHIO
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Philip CLAEYS
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Luigi COCILOVO
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Dragoș Florin DAVID
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ilda FIGUEIREDO
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nils LUNDGREN
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Luís QUEIRÓ
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Andrzej Jan SZEJNA
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jim ALLISTER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- John ATTARD-MONTALTO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Călin Cătălin CHIRIȚĂ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Avril DOYLE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Carlo FATUZZO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bruno GOLLNISCH
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Pedro GUERREIRO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Carl LANG
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jörg LEICHTFRIED
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Andreas MÖLZER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Athanasios PAFILIS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Hubert PIRKER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nicolae Vlad POPA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Carl SCHLYTER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Kathy SINNOTT
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bart STAES
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Konrad SZYMAŃSKI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Thomas ULMER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Frank VANHECKE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Diana WALLIS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Anna ZÁBORSKÁ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Georgs ANDREJEVS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jan ANDERSSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Peter BACO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Gerard BATTEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Irena BELOHORSKÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- John BOWIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Philip BRADBOURN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nicodim BULZESC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Simon BUSUTTIL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Martin CALLANAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Carlo CASINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sylwester CHRUSZCZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Derek Roland CLARK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Trevor COLMAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Proinsias DE ROSSA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Constantin DUMITRIU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Michl EBNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Edite ESTRELA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Göran FÄRM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Glyn FORD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Duarte FREITAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Lidia Joanna GERINGER DE OEDENBERG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Małgorzata HANDZLIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Malcolm HARBOUR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Christopher HEATON-HARRIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Gyula HEGYI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anna HEDH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Erna HENNICOT-SCHOEPGES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jens HOLM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mieczysław Edmund JANOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Filip KACZMAREK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Syed KAMALL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Tunne KELAM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Eija-Riitta KORHOLA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Urszula KRUPA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Stavros LAMBRINIDIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Fernand LE RACHINEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Mary Lou McDONALD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- David MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Gay MITCHELL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Mike NATTRASS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alexandru NAZARE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Rareș-Lucian NICULESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Péter OLAJOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Tobias PFLÜGER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Zita PLEŠTINSKÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ona RAINYTÉ-BODARD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- José RIBEIRO E CASTRO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bogusław ROGALSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Martine ROURE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Toomas SAVI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Olle SCHMIDT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Inger SEGELSTRÖM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Csaba SÓGOR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Dimitar STOYANOV
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Catherine STIHLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ewa TOMASZEWSKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- László TŐKÉS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sir Graham WATSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Åsa WESTLUND
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Thomas WISE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
Amendments | Dossier |
22 |
2008/0033(COD)
2008/07/17
ENVI
22 amendments...
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act Recital 1 a (new) (1a) Alternatives to DCM are available; however, any chemical product intended to dissolve a paint film is likely to have an effect on human health. DCM has been well studied and the health effects are well known, but the alternatives have not been studied to the same extent. In many cases, the human health and environmental hazard and risk profiles have still to be fully evaluated.
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act Recital 1 b (new) (1b) To ensure that the current level of protection is not reduced and to prevent increased exposure to risks to human health and safety that are presently unknown or not quantified, all alternative paint stripper ingredients should be assessed with the same rigour as DCM. Decisions on the marketing of paint strippers should be postponed until both DCM-based paint strippers and the alternatives have been thoroughly evaluated under REACH6.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act Recital 3 (3) DCM-based paint strippers are used by consumers at home to remove paints, varnishes and lacquers both indoors and outdoors. The safe use of DCM by consumers cannot be ensured by training or monitoring. Therefore,
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act Recital 3 (3) DCM-based paint strippers are used by consumers at home to remove paints, varnishes and lacquers both indoors and outdoors. The safe use of DCM by consumers cannot be ensured by training or monitoring. Therefore, the only effective and proportionate measure to eliminate the risks for consumers is a ban on the marketing, supplying and use of DCM- based paint strippers.
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act Recital 4 Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act Recital 5 Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act Recital 6 (6) The fatalities registered in Europe over the last 18 years for industrial and professional uses are mainly attributed to inadequate ventilation, the inappropriate personal protective equipment, the use of inadequate tanks, inadequate product formulations lacking sufficient vapour retardants and the long-term exposure to DCM. Therefore restrictions should be imposed to control and reduce the risks involved in professional and industrial uses.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act Recital 7 (7) Professionals are generally covered by the provisions of the legislation for workers protection.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act Recital 7 (7) Professionals are generally covered by the provisions of the legislation for workers protection. However, many professional activities are often conducted in customers' premises which often do not have all the appropriate measures to manage, control and reduce the risks to health. Moreover, self-employed workers
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act Recital 8 (8) The placing on the market and use of
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act Recital 8 (8) The placing on the market and use of DCM-paint strippers by professionals should therefore be banned in order to protect their health and to reduce the number of fatalities and non-fatal accidents. Nevertheless, when the replacement of DCM is deemed to be particularly difficult or inappropriate, Member States should be able to allow further use of DCM by specially licensed professionals. Member States would be responsible for granting and monitoring such licences, which should be based on specific justifications and compulsory training with specific requirements.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act Recital 9 (9) The number of fatalities and non-fatal accidents registered during industrial activities is an indication of inadequate enforcement of the workplace legislation. The exposure to DCM remains high and further risk reduction measures should apply to workers in industrial installations. Preventive measures such as good ventilation of the workplace that meets occupational exposure limits or respiratory protective equipment with an independent air supply, separate ventilated areas for the drying of stripped articles, appropriate personal protective equipment and additional modification of tanks should be adopted.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act Recital 9 a (new) (9a) In November 2007, the Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits recommended limit values for an eight hours Time Weighted Average and for a 15 minute Short Term Exposure Level. It is appropriate to establish these levels as maximum limits that are to be achieved by effective exhaust ventilation for industrial use, without prejudice to any lower levels set pursuant to national legislation.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act Annex Directive 76/769/EEC Annex I – point (xx) – column 2 – point 2 (2) By way of derogation
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act Annex Directive 76/769/EEC Annex I – point (xx) – column 2 – point 2 (2) By way of derogation
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act Annex Directive 76/769/EEC Annex I – point (xx) – column 2 – point 3 (3)
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act Annex Directive 76/769/EEC Annex I – point (xx) – column 2 – point 3 - introductory part (3) The licence referred to in paragraph (2)
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act Annex Directive 76/769/EEC Annex I – point (xx) – column 2 – point 3 − subparagraph 1 a (new) The licence shall be renewed every five years
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act Annex Directive 76/769/EEC Annex I – point (xx) – column 2 – point 4 (4) Paint strippers containing dichloromethane in concentrations equal to or greater than 0.1% by mass may be used in industrial installations only if the
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act Annex Directive 76/769/EEC Annex I – point (xx) – column 2 – point 4 − point a (a) operation of effective exhaust ventilation
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act Annex Directive 76/769/EEC Annex I – point (xx) – column 2 – point 5 (5) Without prejudice to other Community legislation concerning the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances and preparations, paint strippers containing more than 0.1% by mass of dichloromethane and packaged in containers greater than 1 litre shall be legibly and indelibly marked by [24 months after the entry into force of the Decision] as follows: “Reserved for industrial and professional uses”.”
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act Annex Directive 76/769/EEC Annex I – point (xx) – column 2 – point 5 (5) Without prejudice to other Community legislation concerning the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances and preparations, paint strippers containing more than 0.1% by mass of dichloromethane shall be legibly and indelibly marked by [24 months after the entry into force of the Decision] as follows: “Dangerous! Reserved for industrial and professional uses only”.”
source: PE-409.588
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0192/COM_SEC(2008)0192_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0192/COM_SEC(2008)0192_EN.pdf |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0193/COM_SEC(2008)0193_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0193/COM_SEC(2008)0193_EN.pdf |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=16044&j=0&l=en
|
events/0 |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2008&number=0033&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2008&number=0033&appLng=EN |
docs/0 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.937New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE407.937 |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.588New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE409.588 |
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0341_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0341_EN.html |
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1504)(documentyear:2008)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1504)(documentyear:2008)(documentlanguage:EN) |
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090113&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20090113&type=CRE |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/docs/1/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2009:137:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:137:SOM:EN:HTML |
events/9 |
|
procedure/instrument |
Old
New
Decision |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0192/COM_SEC(2008)0192_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0192/COM_SEC(2008)0192_EN.pdf |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-341&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0341_EN.html |
docs/6/body |
EC
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-341&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0341_EN.html |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-17New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0017_EN.html |
events/6 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ENVI/6/59542New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009D0455New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009D0455 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
DecisionNew
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0080/COM_COM(2008)0080_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0080/COM_COM(2008)0080_EN.pdf |
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|