BETA


2008/0067(CNS) EIB loans: eligibility of Central Asian countries granting a Community guarantee to the EIB against losses under loans and loan guarantees for projects outside the Community

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead BUDG
Committee Opinion AFET
Committee Opinion INTA LIPIETZ Alain (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 181A

Events

2008/11/12
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to establish the eligibility of five Central Asian countries for EIB financing.

LEGISLATIVE ACT: Council Decision 2008/847/EC on the eligibility of central Asian countries under Decision 2006/1016/EC granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans and loan guarantees for projects outside the Community.

CONTENT: the Council adopted this Decision which makes Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan eligible for EIB financing under Community guarantee.

ENTRY INTO FORCE: 15/11/2008.

2008/11/04
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
2008/11/04
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2008/11/04
   CSL - Council Meeting
2008/10/17
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2008/09/04
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2008/09/04
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 614 votes to 3, with 8 abstentions, a legislative resolution amending the proposal for a Council decision on the eligibility of Central Asian countries under Council Decision 2006/1016/EC granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans and loan guarantees for projects outside the Community. The report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Esko SEPPANEN (GUE/NGL, FI) on behalf of the Committee on Budgets.

The main amendments - adopted under the consultation procedure - were as follows:

the guarantee agreement between the Commission and the EIB, as foreseen in Article 8 of Council Decision 2006/1016/EC, shall lay down the detailed provisions and procedures relating to the Community guarantee and shall contain conditions with clear benchmarks regarding respect for human rights; on the basis of the information received from the EIB, the Commission shall produce an assessment and a report, on an annual basis, to be forwarded to the European Parliament and the Council, on the EIB financing operations carried out under this Decision. The report should include an assessment of the contribution of the EIB financing operations to the achievement of the external policy objectives of the EU and especially the contribution to the general objective of developing and consolidating democracy and the rule of law, the objective of respecting human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the observance of international environmental agreements to which the European Community or its Member States are parties; the EIB shall ensure that framework agreements between the Bank and the countries concerned are made available to the public and that adequate and timely objective information is made available to enable them to play a full part in the decision making process.

Parliament noted in an amended recital that the macro-economic conditions prevailing in the Central Asian countries, and in particular the situation of external finances and debt sustainability, have improved in the recent years as a result of strong economic growth and prudent macroeconomic policies, and they should therefore be allowed access to financing from the EIB. There should nevertheless be pre-conditions for their eligibility for EIB loans: these countries must show clear progress in establishing the rule of law, freedom of speech and the media and freedom of NGOs, and in achieving the Millennium Development Goals as specified in the EU Partnership and Cooperation Agreements. They should not be subject to EU sanctions for human rights violations and they should have made real progress in terms of the human rights situation.

Documents
2008/07/18
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2008/07/18
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2008/07/16
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Budgets adopted a report drafted by Esko SEPPANEN (GUE/NGL, FI) and made some amendments to the proposal for a Council decision on the eligibility of Central Asian countries under Council Decision 2006/1016/EC granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans and loan guarantees for projects outside the Community.

The main amendments – adopted in the framework of the consultation procedure – are as follows :

the guarantee agreement between the Commission and the EIB, as foreseen in Article 8 of Council Decision 2006/1016/EC, shall lay down the detailed provisions and procedures relating to the Community guarantee and shall contain conditions with clear benchmarks regarding respect for human rights. The Committee specified that it must be stated that EU policy goals with regard to human rights must not be undermined by Community guarantees for loans by the EIB in countries. An interim agreement of the EU with Turkmenistan on trade and trade-related matters is pending since 2006, due to accusations of systemic violations of fundamental rights by this country. EBRD operations in this country are focused on the promotion of private sector activities, particularly in the SME and micro-finance area, provided that it can be shown that the proposed investments are not effectively controlled by the state. EIB loans should be based on the same principles; on the basis of the information received from the EIB, the Commission shall produce an assessment and a report, on an annual basis, to be forwarded to the European Parliament and the Council, on the EIB financing operations carried out under this Decision. The report should include an assessment of the contribution of the EIB financing operations to the achievement of the external policy objectives of the EU and especially the contribution to the general objective of developing and consolidating democracy and the rule of law, the objective of respecting human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the observance of international environmental agreements to which the European Community or its Member States are parties; the EIB shall ensure that framework agreements between the Bank and the countries concerned are made available to the public and that adequate and timely objective information is made available to enable them to play a full part in the decision making process.

2008/07/15
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/07/01
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2008/06/03
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2008/05/08
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2008/05/05
   EP - LIPIETZ Alain (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in INTA
2008/04/07
   EC - Legislative proposal
Details

PURPOSE: to make Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan eligible for financing under the Community’s European Investment Bank (EIB) guarantee.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Decisions.

BACKGROUND: in June 2007, the European Council requested the development of a new EU Central Asia strategy to serve as an overall framework for EU relations with Central Asia. The Strategy, based upon common interests, defines the EU's priorities for its cooperation with the region as a whole, with implementation tailored to the specific requirements and performance of each Central Asian country. In order to intensify cooperation with the Central Asian countries, the Strategy requires that interaction between the EU and the Central Asian countries be strengthened vis-à-vis the international financial institutions, including the World Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). The European Investment Bank (EIB) should play an important role in the financing projects of interest to the EU in Central Asia. Existing EU legislation specifies that EIB activity in Central Asia should focus on major energy supply and energy transport projects with cross-border implications. Central Asia , with its significant hydrocarbon resources and favourable geographical location for transport routes to European markets, has the potential to play an important role in ensuring the EU's energy supplies.

In 2006, the EU adopted Council Decision 2006/1016/EC granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans and loan guarantees for projects outside the Community. Under the terms of this Decision, countries which have been marked with an asterisk (*) in Annex I can only become eligible for EIB financing under the Community following a decision by the Council on a case by case basis and in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 181a (2) of the Treaty. All five of the Central Asian countries to whom this proposal is addressed fall under this category.

CONTENT: bearing the above in mind, the purpose of this proposal is to establish the eligibility of five Central Asian countries, namely Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, for EIB financing under Council Decision 2006/1016/EC. Any future EIB activity in the five Central Asian countries will be fully compatible with EBRD activities as well as activities under the remit of: the Black Sea Trade and Development Bank, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the International Finance cooperation; and the Nordic Investment Bank, thanks to a number of Memorandums of Understanding that have been signed.

The Commission, in spite of Parliamentary attempts to nullify this choice before the European Court of Justice, has decided to maintain Article 181a of the Treaty establishing the European Community as the sole legal basis of this legislative initiative and not to share the legal basis of the proposal with Article 179 (an instrument of development policy) as requested by Parliament. This is fully in line with Article 2 of Council Decision 2006/1016/EC. The Parliament has asked the European Court of Justice - should it decide in favour of an annulment - to uphold the effects of Council Decision 2006/1016/EC until a new Decision has been adopted.

2008/04/07
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
Details

This Commission Staff Working Paper is an annex to the proposal for a Council Decision on the eligibility of Central Asian countries under Council Decision 2006/1016/EC granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans and loan guarantees for projects outside the Community. It provides background information on the economic situation of five Central Asian countries, namely Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, thus supporting the Commission's proposal for the establishment of the eligibility for European Investment Bank ("EIB") financing under Community guarantee in accordance with Council Decision 2006/1016/EC.

Kazakhstan :

The Kazakh economy is increasingly driven by the hydrocarbon sector. In 2006, hydrocarbon activity (including transport and other related sectors) accounted for more then 30% of nominal GDP. About 30% of total government revenues were derived from the hydrocarbon sector, compared to 6% in 1999. The share of crude oil and natural gas output in industrial production has almost tripled since 1998, reaching 45%. Oil and gas exports accounted for over 55% of total export earnings. Investment in the hydrocarbon sector constituted about a third of total investment and one half of FDI. However, outside the petroleum sector, the business climate remains difficult, notably for small and medium-scale enterprises and foreign investors. A major impediment to private sector development is lack of transparency in law enforcement, customs and tax levy.

Kyrgyzstan :

Following strong real GDP growth in 2004, the new government has managed to maintain political stability. Economic activity in 2005, however, slowed down following the political upheaval and output growth fell short of expectations. Real GDP in 2005 contracted slightly by 0.2%. In 2006, notwithstanding a serious accident in the Kumtor gold mine which limited its output by an estimated 40%, the real economy still rebounded with a GDP growth of 2.7%, mainly due to a recovery in agricultural output and manufacturing. For the year 2007 growth estimate is much higher, at 7.5%. Progress is lagging in a number of areas though. In particular, slow improvements in the business environment, insufficient regulatory and tax reform, and the still limited size of the financial sector continue to hamper entrepreneurship and investment. Key challenges are to improve tax administration, adopt concrete measures against corruption, enhance effectiveness of courts and reduce bureaucracy. Infrastructure is characterised by a generally low quality of services and inefficiency, requiring extensive investment which the public sector has been unable to upgrade due to fiscal constraints. The tax levels for companies are high and related procedures are burdensome.

Tajikistan :

Tajikistan ’s GDP growth accelerated from 6.7% in 2005 to 7.0% in 2006 and to an estimated 7.5% in 2007, mainly due to major foreign-investment projects and strong domestic demand. Cotton and aluminium remain the traditional pillars of the economy. However, diversification of the economy continued (though slowly), enlarging the share of the services sector, with trade, construction, communications and financial activities being the fastest growing sectors. The share of agriculture has declined between 1991 and 2005 from 36% of GDP to 22%. Domestic demand is driven essentially by higher private consumption spending, in turn mainly financed by strong growth in workers’ remittances and, to a lesser degree, by public sector wage rises. Remittances are estimated in the 2006 balance of payments to have increased to about $900 million, or about one-third of GDP. Tajikistan's business climate, however, continues to be difficult. Tajikistan ranks 158 out of 178 countries in the World Bank’s Doing Business Report for 2008 and corruption remains an important obstacle, both to business and reform.

Turkmenistan :

With large gas reserves and a small population, Turkmenistan’s export potential is huge, though substantial investments are needed to increase production. Although its 4.5 million people receive free gas, electricity and water, incomes are among the lowest in Central Asia and health and education services are declining. The Government's economic policy is still determined by central planning. It continues to rely on production targets, mandatory state procurement, directed bank credits and foreign exchange restrictions. Key sectors of the economy, including the energy sector and the banking system, remain in state hands. The availability and accuracy of data and information continue to be major constraints in the analysis of economic developments in Turkmenistan. According to official statistics, real GDP growth in the last years was about 20%. The Turkmen authorities have recently expressed a willingness to engage more actively with international donors such as the World Bank (WB), and they have taken positive steps to address long-standing issues that hindered development of a WB program in Turkmenistan. The sustainability of the government's economic policies will depend mainly on its ability to earn hard currency from commodity exports. In view of the current development of the oil-refining, gas and cotton processing sectors, it seems likely that export revenue will hold up sufficiently to preclude the need for the government to make any progress towards introducing economic reform. The restrictive business environment will continue to deter most western foreign investors, dampening inflows of FDI.

Uzbekistan :

Developments strongly suggest that the economy, despite the above-trend growth of the last three years, is underperforming relative to its potential, largely because of the reform backlog in structural policies. GDP grew by an average of 7.4% in 2005-2007, as compared to an average of 4.2% in 1999–2003. Agriculture’s contribution was helped by a record cotton crop in 2005. Industrial performance has improved over the last, with significant contributions from machinery, chemicals, and metals, in good part based on larger export sales. Also noncommodity export recorded strong growth. In September 2007, the Government of Uzbekistan formally adopted its first Welfare Improvement Strategy (WIS), covering the period 2008–10, and transmitted the document to the World Bank (International Development Association – IDA) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The strategy accords a somewhat greater role to market principles and describes measures to undertake structural reforms. There is a particular emphasis on improving the business environment; it also provides a more candid assessment of economic and social challenges facing the country. Trade policy remains restrictive. Effective rates of protection against consumer imports are significant and excise tax rates on a wide range of consumer imports are higher than on domestic goods. Other regulatory “behind-the-border” barriers to trade include the regulation of wholesale and retail trade affecting the domestic marketing of imports. This regime imposes a heavy regulatory burden on individual entrepreneurs, in particular cross-border shuttle traders, who are an important source of supply for the private sector and contributes to the adverse investment environment. The poor business climate is reflected by the limited amount of FDI inflows estimated at $ 200 million in 2005 (1.5% of GDP). Future FDI inflows however will be buoyed through hydrocarbons investments from the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation.

2008/04/06
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to make Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan eligible for financing under the Community’s European Investment Bank (EIB) guarantee.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Decisions.

BACKGROUND: in June 2007, the European Council requested the development of a new EU Central Asia strategy to serve as an overall framework for EU relations with Central Asia. The Strategy, based upon common interests, defines the EU's priorities for its cooperation with the region as a whole, with implementation tailored to the specific requirements and performance of each Central Asian country. In order to intensify cooperation with the Central Asian countries, the Strategy requires that interaction between the EU and the Central Asian countries be strengthened vis-à-vis the international financial institutions, including the World Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). The European Investment Bank (EIB) should play an important role in the financing projects of interest to the EU in Central Asia. Existing EU legislation specifies that EIB activity in Central Asia should focus on major energy supply and energy transport projects with cross-border implications. Central Asia , with its significant hydrocarbon resources and favourable geographical location for transport routes to European markets, has the potential to play an important role in ensuring the EU's energy supplies.

In 2006, the EU adopted Council Decision 2006/1016/EC granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans and loan guarantees for projects outside the Community. Under the terms of this Decision, countries which have been marked with an asterisk (*) in Annex I can only become eligible for EIB financing under the Community following a decision by the Council on a case by case basis and in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 181a (2) of the Treaty. All five of the Central Asian countries to whom this proposal is addressed fall under this category.

CONTENT: bearing the above in mind, the purpose of this proposal is to establish the eligibility of five Central Asian countries, namely Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, for EIB financing under Council Decision 2006/1016/EC. Any future EIB activity in the five Central Asian countries will be fully compatible with EBRD activities as well as activities under the remit of: the Black Sea Trade and Development Bank, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the International Finance cooperation; and the Nordic Investment Bank, thanks to a number of Memorandums of Understanding that have been signed.

The Commission, in spite of Parliamentary attempts to nullify this choice before the European Court of Justice, has decided to maintain Article 181a of the Treaty establishing the European Community as the sole legal basis of this legislative initiative and not to share the legal basis of the proposal with Article 179 (an instrument of development policy) as requested by Parliament. This is fully in line with Article 2 of Council Decision 2006/1016/EC. The Parliament has asked the European Court of Justice - should it decide in favour of an annulment - to uphold the effects of Council Decision 2006/1016/EC until a new Decision has been adopted.

Documents

Votes

Rapport Seppänen A6-0317/2008 - am. 10 #

2008/09/04 Outcome: +: 555, -: 37, 0: 25
DE GB FR ES IT RO NL PL HU BE EL AT SK BG SE PT DK FI LT SI EE LU IE MT CY CZ LV
Total
84
60
58
43
50
28
27
48
21
20
18
15
14
15
13
13
11
11
9
5
5
4
11
3
2
21
8
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
234

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2

Cyprus PPE-DE

1

Latvia PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
175

Finland PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Estonia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Malta PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
80

Spain ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
37

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
24

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
23

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

5

Italy NI

2
2

Austria NI

1

Bulgaria NI

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
10

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

3

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
34

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1

Rapport Seppänen A6-0317/2008 - am. 11 #

2008/09/04 Outcome: -: 336, +: 267, 0: 24
FR BE PT AT NL EL DK EE SE ES LU MT DE CY BG RO FI LT SI SK LV HU IE GB CZ IT PL
Total
62
20
12
15
27
17
11
6
15
43
5
3
84
2
15
28
11
9
5
14
8
21
11
60
21
53
49
icon: PSE PSE
181

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

For (1)

1

Finland PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Czechia PSE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
37

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Italy Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
25

France GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Italy GUE/NGL

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
10

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

3
icon: NI NI
22

Austria NI

1

Bulgaria NI

2

Slovakia NI

3

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

5

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Italy NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2
2
icon: UEN UEN
35

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
82

Austria ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Spain ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
235

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Cyprus PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Rapport Seppänen A6-0317/2008 - résolution #

2008/09/04 Outcome: +: 614, 0: 8, -: 3
DE FR GB IT PL ES RO NL HU CZ BE SE AT EL SK BG PT IE FI DK LT LV EE SI LU MT CY
Total
84
63
59
53
47
44
28
27
21
21
18
15
15
17
14
15
13
11
11
11
9
8
6
5
5
3
2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
235

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2

Cyprus PPE-DE

1
icon: PSE PSE
182

Czechia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Finland PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
81

Spain ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
37

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
35

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
25

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
20

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

5

Italy NI

2

Czechia NI

1

Austria NI

1

Bulgaria NI

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
10

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
18 2008/0067(CNS)
2008/06/26 INTA 1 amendments...
source: PE-409.434
2008/07/02 BUDG 17 amendments...
source: PE-409.492

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/rapporteur
  • name: SEPPÄNEN Esko date: 2004-09-20T00:00:00 group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
docs/0
date
2008-04-07T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/0
date
2008-04-07T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
docs/1
date
2008-04-07T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0417/COM_SEC(2008)0417_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0417/COM_SEC(2008)0417_EN.pdf
docs/3
date
2008-07-15T00:00:00
docs
url: http://nullEN&reference=PE407.774&secondRef=02 title: PE407.774
committee
INTA
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/4
date
2008-07-15T00:00:00
docs
url: http://nullEN&reference=PE407.774&secondRef=02 title: PE407.774
committee
INTA
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE407.774&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-407774_EN.html
events/0/date
Old
2008-04-07T00:00:00
New
2008-04-06T00:00:00
links/National parliaments/url
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=CNS&year=2008&number=0067&appLng=EN
New
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=CNS&year=2008&number=0067&appLng=EN
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0417/COM_SEC(2008)0417_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0417/COM_SEC(2008)0417_EN.pdf
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.683
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE407.683
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.492
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE409.492
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.774&secondRef=02
New
http://nullEN&reference=PE407.774&secondRef=02
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0317_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0317_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15399&j=0&l=en
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0172/COM_COM(2008)0172_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0172/COM_COM(2008)0172_EN.pdf
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0317_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0317_EN.html
events/5
date
2008-09-04T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0403_EN.html title: T6-0403/2008
summary
events/5
date
2008-09-04T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0403_EN.html title: T6-0403/2008
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: SEPPÄNEN Esko date: 2004-09-20T00:00:00 group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2004-09-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SEPPÄNEN Esko group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: LIPIETZ Alain date: 2008-05-05T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2008-05-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LIPIETZ Alain group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0417/COM_SEC(2008)0417_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0417/COM_SEC(2008)0417_EN.pdf
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-317&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0317_EN.html
docs/5/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-317&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0317_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-403
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0403_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2008-04-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0172/COM_COM(2008)0172_EN.pdf title: COM(2008)0172 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52008PC0172:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/economy_finance/index_en.htm title: Economic and Financial Affairs Commissioner: ALMUNIA Joaquín type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2008-05-08T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2004-09-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: SEPPÄNEN Esko body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2008-05-05T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: LIPIETZ Alain
  • date: 2008-07-16T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2004-09-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: SEPPÄNEN Esko body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2008-05-05T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: LIPIETZ Alain type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-07-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-317&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A6-0317/2008 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2004-09-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: SEPPÄNEN Esko body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2008-05-05T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: LIPIETZ Alain type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-09-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=15399&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-403 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0403/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2008-11-04T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2901
  • date: 2008-11-04T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2008-11-04T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
  • date: 2008-11-12T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32008D0847 title: Decision 2008/847 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:301:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ L 301 12.11.2008, p. 0013
commission
  • body: EC dg: Economic and Financial Affairs commissioner: ALMUNIA Joaquín
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2004-09-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SEPPÄNEN Esko group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
BUDG
date
2004-09-20T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: GUE/NGL name: SEPPÄNEN Esko
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2008-05-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LIPIETZ Alain group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
INTA
date
2008-05-05T00:00:00
committee_full
International Trade
rapporteur
group: Verts/ALE name: LIPIETZ Alain
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2901 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2901*&MEET_DATE=04/11/2008 date: 2008-11-04T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2008-04-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0417/COM_SEC(2008)0417_EN.pdf title: SEC(2008)0417 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=417 title: EUR-Lex summary: This Commission Staff Working Paper is an annex to the proposal for a Council Decision on the eligibility of Central Asian countries under Council Decision 2006/1016/EC granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans and loan guarantees for projects outside the Community. It provides background information on the economic situation of five Central Asian countries, namely Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, thus supporting the Commission's proposal for the establishment of the eligibility for European Investment Bank ("EIB") financing under Community guarantee in accordance with Council Decision 2006/1016/EC. Kazakhstan : The Kazakh economy is increasingly driven by the hydrocarbon sector. In 2006, hydrocarbon activity (including transport and other related sectors) accounted for more then 30% of nominal GDP. About 30% of total government revenues were derived from the hydrocarbon sector, compared to 6% in 1999. The share of crude oil and natural gas output in industrial production has almost tripled since 1998, reaching 45%. Oil and gas exports accounted for over 55% of total export earnings. Investment in the hydrocarbon sector constituted about a third of total investment and one half of FDI. However, outside the petroleum sector, the business climate remains difficult, notably for small and medium-scale enterprises and foreign investors. A major impediment to private sector development is lack of transparency in law enforcement, customs and tax levy. Kyrgyzstan : Following strong real GDP growth in 2004, the new government has managed to maintain political stability. Economic activity in 2005, however, slowed down following the political upheaval and output growth fell short of expectations. Real GDP in 2005 contracted slightly by 0.2%. In 2006, notwithstanding a serious accident in the Kumtor gold mine which limited its output by an estimated 40%, the real economy still rebounded with a GDP growth of 2.7%, mainly due to a recovery in agricultural output and manufacturing. For the year 2007 growth estimate is much higher, at 7.5%. Progress is lagging in a number of areas though. In particular, slow improvements in the business environment, insufficient regulatory and tax reform, and the still limited size of the financial sector continue to hamper entrepreneurship and investment. Key challenges are to improve tax administration, adopt concrete measures against corruption, enhance effectiveness of courts and reduce bureaucracy. Infrastructure is characterised by a generally low quality of services and inefficiency, requiring extensive investment which the public sector has been unable to upgrade due to fiscal constraints. The tax levels for companies are high and related procedures are burdensome. Tajikistan : Tajikistan ’s GDP growth accelerated from 6.7% in 2005 to 7.0% in 2006 and to an estimated 7.5% in 2007, mainly due to major foreign-investment projects and strong domestic demand. Cotton and aluminium remain the traditional pillars of the economy. However, diversification of the economy continued (though slowly), enlarging the share of the services sector, with trade, construction, communications and financial activities being the fastest growing sectors. The share of agriculture has declined between 1991 and 2005 from 36% of GDP to 22%. Domestic demand is driven essentially by higher private consumption spending, in turn mainly financed by strong growth in workers’ remittances and, to a lesser degree, by public sector wage rises. Remittances are estimated in the 2006 balance of payments to have increased to about $900 million, or about one-third of GDP. Tajikistan's business climate, however, continues to be difficult. Tajikistan ranks 158 out of 178 countries in the World Bank’s Doing Business Report for 2008 and corruption remains an important obstacle, both to business and reform. Turkmenistan : With large gas reserves and a small population, Turkmenistan’s export potential is huge, though substantial investments are needed to increase production. Although its 4.5 million people receive free gas, electricity and water, incomes are among the lowest in Central Asia and health and education services are declining. The Government's economic policy is still determined by central planning. It continues to rely on production targets, mandatory state procurement, directed bank credits and foreign exchange restrictions. Key sectors of the economy, including the energy sector and the banking system, remain in state hands. The availability and accuracy of data and information continue to be major constraints in the analysis of economic developments in Turkmenistan. According to official statistics, real GDP growth in the last years was about 20%. The Turkmen authorities have recently expressed a willingness to engage more actively with international donors such as the World Bank (WB), and they have taken positive steps to address long-standing issues that hindered development of a WB program in Turkmenistan. The sustainability of the government's economic policies will depend mainly on its ability to earn hard currency from commodity exports. In view of the current development of the oil-refining, gas and cotton processing sectors, it seems likely that export revenue will hold up sufficiently to preclude the need for the government to make any progress towards introducing economic reform. The restrictive business environment will continue to deter most western foreign investors, dampening inflows of FDI. Uzbekistan : Developments strongly suggest that the economy, despite the above-trend growth of the last three years, is underperforming relative to its potential, largely because of the reform backlog in structural policies. GDP grew by an average of 7.4% in 2005-2007, as compared to an average of 4.2% in 1999–2003. Agriculture’s contribution was helped by a record cotton crop in 2005. Industrial performance has improved over the last, with significant contributions from machinery, chemicals, and metals, in good part based on larger export sales. Also noncommodity export recorded strong growth. In September 2007, the Government of Uzbekistan formally adopted its first Welfare Improvement Strategy (WIS), covering the period 2008–10, and transmitted the document to the World Bank (International Development Association – IDA) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The strategy accords a somewhat greater role to market principles and describes measures to undertake structural reforms. There is a particular emphasis on improving the business environment; it also provides a more candid assessment of economic and social challenges facing the country. Trade policy remains restrictive. Effective rates of protection against consumer imports are significant and excise tax rates on a wide range of consumer imports are higher than on domestic goods. Other regulatory “behind-the-border” barriers to trade include the regulation of wholesale and retail trade affecting the domestic marketing of imports. This regime imposes a heavy regulatory burden on individual entrepreneurs, in particular cross-border shuttle traders, who are an important source of supply for the private sector and contributes to the adverse investment environment. The poor business climate is reflected by the limited amount of FDI inflows estimated at $ 200 million in 2005 (1.5% of GDP). Future FDI inflows however will be buoyed through hydrocarbons investments from the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation. type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2008-06-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.683 title: PE407.683 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2008-07-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.492 title: PE409.492 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2008-07-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.774&secondRef=02 title: PE407.774 committee: INTA type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2008-07-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-317&language=EN title: A6-0317/2008 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2008-10-17T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=15399&j=0&l=en title: SP(2008)6073 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2008-04-07T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0172/COM_COM(2008)0172_EN.pdf title: COM(2008)0172 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=172 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to make Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan eligible for financing under the Community’s European Investment Bank (EIB) guarantee. PROPOSED ACT: Council Decisions. BACKGROUND: in June 2007, the European Council requested the development of a new EU Central Asia strategy to serve as an overall framework for EU relations with Central Asia. The Strategy, based upon common interests, defines the EU's priorities for its cooperation with the region as a whole, with implementation tailored to the specific requirements and performance of each Central Asian country. In order to intensify cooperation with the Central Asian countries, the Strategy requires that interaction between the EU and the Central Asian countries be strengthened vis-à-vis the international financial institutions, including the World Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). The European Investment Bank (EIB) should play an important role in the financing projects of interest to the EU in Central Asia. Existing EU legislation specifies that EIB activity in Central Asia should focus on major energy supply and energy transport projects with cross-border implications. Central Asia , with its significant hydrocarbon resources and favourable geographical location for transport routes to European markets, has the potential to play an important role in ensuring the EU's energy supplies. In 2006, the EU adopted Council Decision 2006/1016/EC granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans and loan guarantees for projects outside the Community. Under the terms of this Decision, countries which have been marked with an asterisk (*) in Annex I can only become eligible for EIB financing under the Community following a decision by the Council on a case by case basis and in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 181a (2) of the Treaty. All five of the Central Asian countries to whom this proposal is addressed fall under this category. CONTENT: bearing the above in mind, the purpose of this proposal is to establish the eligibility of five Central Asian countries, namely Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, for EIB financing under Council Decision 2006/1016/EC. Any future EIB activity in the five Central Asian countries will be fully compatible with EBRD activities as well as activities under the remit of: the Black Sea Trade and Development Bank, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the International Finance cooperation; and the Nordic Investment Bank, thanks to a number of Memorandums of Understanding that have been signed. The Commission, in spite of Parliamentary attempts to nullify this choice before the European Court of Justice, has decided to maintain Article 181a of the Treaty establishing the European Community as the sole legal basis of this legislative initiative and not to share the legal basis of the proposal with Article 179 (an instrument of development policy) as requested by Parliament. This is fully in line with Article 2 of Council Decision 2006/1016/EC. The Parliament has asked the European Court of Justice - should it decide in favour of an annulment - to uphold the effects of Council Decision 2006/1016/EC until a new Decision has been adopted.
  • date: 2008-05-08T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2008-07-16T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Budgets adopted a report drafted by Esko SEPPANEN (GUE/NGL, FI) and made some amendments to the proposal for a Council decision on the eligibility of Central Asian countries under Council Decision 2006/1016/EC granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans and loan guarantees for projects outside the Community. The main amendments – adopted in the framework of the consultation procedure – are as follows : the guarantee agreement between the Commission and the EIB, as foreseen in Article 8 of Council Decision 2006/1016/EC, shall lay down the detailed provisions and procedures relating to the Community guarantee and shall contain conditions with clear benchmarks regarding respect for human rights. The Committee specified that it must be stated that EU policy goals with regard to human rights must not be undermined by Community guarantees for loans by the EIB in countries. An interim agreement of the EU with Turkmenistan on trade and trade-related matters is pending since 2006, due to accusations of systemic violations of fundamental rights by this country. EBRD operations in this country are focused on the promotion of private sector activities, particularly in the SME and micro-finance area, provided that it can be shown that the proposed investments are not effectively controlled by the state. EIB loans should be based on the same principles; on the basis of the information received from the EIB, the Commission shall produce an assessment and a report, on an annual basis, to be forwarded to the European Parliament and the Council, on the EIB financing operations carried out under this Decision. The report should include an assessment of the contribution of the EIB financing operations to the achievement of the external policy objectives of the EU and especially the contribution to the general objective of developing and consolidating democracy and the rule of law, the objective of respecting human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the observance of international environmental agreements to which the European Community or its Member States are parties; the EIB shall ensure that framework agreements between the Bank and the countries concerned are made available to the public and that adequate and timely objective information is made available to enable them to play a full part in the decision making process.
  • date: 2008-07-18T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-317&language=EN title: A6-0317/2008
  • date: 2008-09-04T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=15399&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2008-09-04T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-403 title: T6-0403/2008 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 614 votes to 3, with 8 abstentions, a legislative resolution amending the proposal for a Council decision on the eligibility of Central Asian countries under Council Decision 2006/1016/EC granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans and loan guarantees for projects outside the Community. The report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Esko SEPPANEN (GUE/NGL, FI) on behalf of the Committee on Budgets. The main amendments - adopted under the consultation procedure - were as follows: the guarantee agreement between the Commission and the EIB, as foreseen in Article 8 of Council Decision 2006/1016/EC, shall lay down the detailed provisions and procedures relating to the Community guarantee and shall contain conditions with clear benchmarks regarding respect for human rights; on the basis of the information received from the EIB, the Commission shall produce an assessment and a report, on an annual basis, to be forwarded to the European Parliament and the Council, on the EIB financing operations carried out under this Decision. The report should include an assessment of the contribution of the EIB financing operations to the achievement of the external policy objectives of the EU and especially the contribution to the general objective of developing and consolidating democracy and the rule of law, the objective of respecting human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the observance of international environmental agreements to which the European Community or its Member States are parties; the EIB shall ensure that framework agreements between the Bank and the countries concerned are made available to the public and that adequate and timely objective information is made available to enable them to play a full part in the decision making process. Parliament noted in an amended recital that the macro-economic conditions prevailing in the Central Asian countries, and in particular the situation of external finances and debt sustainability, have improved in the recent years as a result of strong economic growth and prudent macroeconomic policies, and they should therefore be allowed access to financing from the EIB. There should nevertheless be pre-conditions for their eligibility for EIB loans: these countries must show clear progress in establishing the rule of law, freedom of speech and the media and freedom of NGOs, and in achieving the Millennium Development Goals as specified in the EU Partnership and Cooperation Agreements. They should not be subject to EU sanctions for human rights violations and they should have made real progress in terms of the human rights situation.
  • date: 2008-11-04T00:00:00 type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2008-11-04T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2008-11-12T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to establish the eligibility of five Central Asian countries for EIB financing. LEGISLATIVE ACT: Council Decision 2008/847/EC on the eligibility of central Asian countries under Decision 2006/1016/EC granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans and loan guarantees for projects outside the Community. CONTENT: the Council adopted this Decision which makes Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan eligible for EIB financing under Community guarantee. ENTRY INTO FORCE: 15/11/2008. docs: title: Decision 2008/847 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32008D0847 title: OJ L 301 12.11.2008, p. 0013 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:301:SOM:EN:HTML
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/economy_finance/index_en.htm title: Economic and Financial Affairs commissioner: ALMUNIA Joaquín
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
BUDG/6/61557
New
  • BUDG/6/61557
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32008D0847
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32008D0847
procedure/legal_basis/0
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 181A
procedure/legal_basis/0
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 181
procedure/subject
Old
  • 6.30.04 Loans to third-countries, Guarantee Fund
  • 6.40.04.06 Relations with Central Asian countries
New
6.30.04
Loans to third-countries, Guarantee Fund
6.40.04.06
Relations with central Asian countries
activities/8/docs/1/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2008:301:TOC
New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:301:SOM:EN:HTML
links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
activities
  • date: 2008-04-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0172/COM_COM(2008)0172_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52008PC0172:EN type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(2008)0172 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/economy_finance/index_en.htm title: Economic and Financial Affairs Commissioner: ALMUNIA Joaquín
  • date: 2008-05-08T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2004-09-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: SEPPÄNEN Esko body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2008-05-05T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: LIPIETZ Alain
  • date: 2008-07-16T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2004-09-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: SEPPÄNEN Esko body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2008-05-05T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: LIPIETZ Alain type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-07-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-317&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A6-0317/2008 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2004-09-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: SEPPÄNEN Esko body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2008-05-05T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: LIPIETZ Alain type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-09-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=15399&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-403 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0403/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2008-11-04T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2901
  • date: 2008-11-04T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2008-11-04T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
  • date: 2008-11-12T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32008D0847 title: Decision 2008/847 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2008:301:TOC title: OJ L 301 12.11.2008, p. 0013
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2004-09-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: SEPPÄNEN Esko
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2008-05-05T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: LIPIETZ Alain
links
National parliaments
European Commission
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/economy_finance/index_en.htm title: Economic and Financial Affairs commissioner: ALMUNIA Joaquín
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
BUDG/6/61557
geographical_area
reference
2008/0067(CNS)
instrument
Decision
legal_basis
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 181
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Legislation
title
EIB loans: eligibility of Central Asian countries granting a Community guarantee to the EIB against losses under loans and loan guarantees for projects outside the Community
type
CNS - Consultation procedure
final
subject