Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | BUDG | ||
Committee Opinion | AFET | ||
Committee Opinion | INTA | LIPIETZ Alain ( Verts/ALE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 181A
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 181ASubjects
Events
PURPOSE: to establish the eligibility of five Central Asian countries for EIB financing.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Council Decision 2008/847/EC on the eligibility of central Asian countries under Decision 2006/1016/EC granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans and loan guarantees for projects outside the Community.
CONTENT: the Council adopted this Decision which makes Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan eligible for EIB financing under Community guarantee.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 15/11/2008.
The European Parliament adopted by 614 votes to 3, with 8 abstentions, a legislative resolution amending the proposal for a Council decision on the eligibility of Central Asian countries under Council Decision 2006/1016/EC granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans and loan guarantees for projects outside the Community. The report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Esko SEPPANEN (GUE/NGL, FI) on behalf of the Committee on Budgets.
The main amendments - adopted under the consultation procedure - were as follows:
the guarantee agreement between the Commission and the EIB, as foreseen in Article 8 of Council Decision 2006/1016/EC, shall lay down the detailed provisions and procedures relating to the Community guarantee and shall contain conditions with clear benchmarks regarding respect for human rights; on the basis of the information received from the EIB, the Commission shall produce an assessment and a report, on an annual basis, to be forwarded to the European Parliament and the Council, on the EIB financing operations carried out under this Decision. The report should include an assessment of the contribution of the EIB financing operations to the achievement of the external policy objectives of the EU and especially the contribution to the general objective of developing and consolidating democracy and the rule of law, the objective of respecting human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the observance of international environmental agreements to which the European Community or its Member States are parties; the EIB shall ensure that framework agreements between the Bank and the countries concerned are made available to the public and that adequate and timely objective information is made available to enable them to play a full part in the decision making process.
Parliament noted in an amended recital that the macro-economic conditions prevailing in the Central Asian countries, and in particular the situation of external finances and debt sustainability, have improved in the recent years as a result of strong economic growth and prudent macroeconomic policies, and they should therefore be allowed access to financing from the EIB. There should nevertheless be pre-conditions for their eligibility for EIB loans: these countries must show clear progress in establishing the rule of law, freedom of speech and the media and freedom of NGOs, and in achieving the Millennium Development Goals as specified in the EU Partnership and Cooperation Agreements. They should not be subject to EU sanctions for human rights violations and they should have made real progress in terms of the human rights situation.
The Committee on Budgets adopted a report drafted by Esko SEPPANEN (GUE/NGL, FI) and made some amendments to the proposal for a Council decision on the eligibility of Central Asian countries under Council Decision 2006/1016/EC granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans and loan guarantees for projects outside the Community.
The main amendments – adopted in the framework of the consultation procedure – are as follows :
the guarantee agreement between the Commission and the EIB, as foreseen in Article 8 of Council Decision 2006/1016/EC, shall lay down the detailed provisions and procedures relating to the Community guarantee and shall contain conditions with clear benchmarks regarding respect for human rights. The Committee specified that it must be stated that EU policy goals with regard to human rights must not be undermined by Community guarantees for loans by the EIB in countries. An interim agreement of the EU with Turkmenistan on trade and trade-related matters is pending since 2006, due to accusations of systemic violations of fundamental rights by this country. EBRD operations in this country are focused on the promotion of private sector activities, particularly in the SME and micro-finance area, provided that it can be shown that the proposed investments are not effectively controlled by the state. EIB loans should be based on the same principles; on the basis of the information received from the EIB, the Commission shall produce an assessment and a report, on an annual basis, to be forwarded to the European Parliament and the Council, on the EIB financing operations carried out under this Decision. The report should include an assessment of the contribution of the EIB financing operations to the achievement of the external policy objectives of the EU and especially the contribution to the general objective of developing and consolidating democracy and the rule of law, the objective of respecting human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the observance of international environmental agreements to which the European Community or its Member States are parties; the EIB shall ensure that framework agreements between the Bank and the countries concerned are made available to the public and that adequate and timely objective information is made available to enable them to play a full part in the decision making process.
PURPOSE: to make Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan eligible for financing under the Community’s European Investment Bank (EIB) guarantee.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Decisions.
BACKGROUND: in June 2007, the European Council requested the development of a new EU Central Asia strategy to serve as an overall framework for EU relations with Central Asia. The Strategy, based upon common interests, defines the EU's priorities for its cooperation with the region as a whole, with implementation tailored to the specific requirements and performance of each Central Asian country. In order to intensify cooperation with the Central Asian countries, the Strategy requires that interaction between the EU and the Central Asian countries be strengthened vis-à-vis the international financial institutions, including the World Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). The European Investment Bank (EIB) should play an important role in the financing projects of interest to the EU in Central Asia. Existing EU legislation specifies that EIB activity in Central Asia should focus on major energy supply and energy transport projects with cross-border implications. Central Asia , with its significant hydrocarbon resources and favourable geographical location for transport routes to European markets, has the potential to play an important role in ensuring the EU's energy supplies.
In 2006, the EU adopted Council Decision 2006/1016/EC granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans and loan guarantees for projects outside the Community. Under the terms of this Decision, countries which have been marked with an asterisk (*) in Annex I can only become eligible for EIB financing under the Community following a decision by the Council on a case by case basis and in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 181a (2) of the Treaty. All five of the Central Asian countries to whom this proposal is addressed fall under this category.
CONTENT: bearing the above in mind, the purpose of this proposal is to establish the eligibility of five Central Asian countries, namely Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, for EIB financing under Council Decision 2006/1016/EC. Any future EIB activity in the five Central Asian countries will be fully compatible with EBRD activities as well as activities under the remit of: the Black Sea Trade and Development Bank, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the International Finance cooperation; and the Nordic Investment Bank, thanks to a number of Memorandums of Understanding that have been signed.
The Commission, in spite of Parliamentary attempts to nullify this choice before the European Court of Justice, has decided to maintain Article 181a of the Treaty establishing the European Community as the sole legal basis of this legislative initiative and not to share the legal basis of the proposal with Article 179 (an instrument of development policy) as requested by Parliament. This is fully in line with Article 2 of Council Decision 2006/1016/EC. The Parliament has asked the European Court of Justice - should it decide in favour of an annulment - to uphold the effects of Council Decision 2006/1016/EC until a new Decision has been adopted.
This Commission Staff Working Paper is an annex to the proposal for a Council Decision on the eligibility of Central Asian countries under Council Decision 2006/1016/EC granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans and loan guarantees for projects outside the Community. It provides background information on the economic situation of five Central Asian countries, namely Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, thus supporting the Commission's proposal for the establishment of the eligibility for European Investment Bank ("EIB") financing under Community guarantee in accordance with Council Decision 2006/1016/EC.
Kazakhstan :
The Kazakh economy is increasingly driven by the hydrocarbon sector. In 2006, hydrocarbon activity (including transport and other related sectors) accounted for more then 30% of nominal GDP. About 30% of total government revenues were derived from the hydrocarbon sector, compared to 6% in 1999. The share of crude oil and natural gas output in industrial production has almost tripled since 1998, reaching 45%. Oil and gas exports accounted for over 55% of total export earnings. Investment in the hydrocarbon sector constituted about a third of total investment and one half of FDI. However, outside the petroleum sector, the business climate remains difficult, notably for small and medium-scale enterprises and foreign investors. A major impediment to private sector development is lack of transparency in law enforcement, customs and tax levy.
Kyrgyzstan :
Following strong real GDP growth in 2004, the new government has managed to maintain political stability. Economic activity in 2005, however, slowed down following the political upheaval and output growth fell short of expectations. Real GDP in 2005 contracted slightly by 0.2%. In 2006, notwithstanding a serious accident in the Kumtor gold mine which limited its output by an estimated 40%, the real economy still rebounded with a GDP growth of 2.7%, mainly due to a recovery in agricultural output and manufacturing. For the year 2007 growth estimate is much higher, at 7.5%. Progress is lagging in a number of areas though. In particular, slow improvements in the business environment, insufficient regulatory and tax reform, and the still limited size of the financial sector continue to hamper entrepreneurship and investment. Key challenges are to improve tax administration, adopt concrete measures against corruption, enhance effectiveness of courts and reduce bureaucracy. Infrastructure is characterised by a generally low quality of services and inefficiency, requiring extensive investment which the public sector has been unable to upgrade due to fiscal constraints. The tax levels for companies are high and related procedures are burdensome.
Tajikistan :
Tajikistan ’s GDP growth accelerated from 6.7% in 2005 to 7.0% in 2006 and to an estimated 7.5% in 2007, mainly due to major foreign-investment projects and strong domestic demand. Cotton and aluminium remain the traditional pillars of the economy. However, diversification of the economy continued (though slowly), enlarging the share of the services sector, with trade, construction, communications and financial activities being the fastest growing sectors. The share of agriculture has declined between 1991 and 2005 from 36% of GDP to 22%. Domestic demand is driven essentially by higher private consumption spending, in turn mainly financed by strong growth in workers’ remittances and, to a lesser degree, by public sector wage rises. Remittances are estimated in the 2006 balance of payments to have increased to about $900 million, or about one-third of GDP. Tajikistan's business climate, however, continues to be difficult. Tajikistan ranks 158 out of 178 countries in the World Bank’s Doing Business Report for 2008 and corruption remains an important obstacle, both to business and reform.
Turkmenistan :
With large gas reserves and a small population, Turkmenistan’s export potential is huge, though substantial investments are needed to increase production. Although its 4.5 million people receive free gas, electricity and water, incomes are among the lowest in Central Asia and health and education services are declining. The Government's economic policy is still determined by central planning. It continues to rely on production targets, mandatory state procurement, directed bank credits and foreign exchange restrictions. Key sectors of the economy, including the energy sector and the banking system, remain in state hands. The availability and accuracy of data and information continue to be major constraints in the analysis of economic developments in Turkmenistan. According to official statistics, real GDP growth in the last years was about 20%. The Turkmen authorities have recently expressed a willingness to engage more actively with international donors such as the World Bank (WB), and they have taken positive steps to address long-standing issues that hindered development of a WB program in Turkmenistan. The sustainability of the government's economic policies will depend mainly on its ability to earn hard currency from commodity exports. In view of the current development of the oil-refining, gas and cotton processing sectors, it seems likely that export revenue will hold up sufficiently to preclude the need for the government to make any progress towards introducing economic reform. The restrictive business environment will continue to deter most western foreign investors, dampening inflows of FDI.
Uzbekistan :
Developments strongly suggest that the economy, despite the above-trend growth of the last three years, is underperforming relative to its potential, largely because of the reform backlog in structural policies. GDP grew by an average of 7.4% in 2005-2007, as compared to an average of 4.2% in 1999–2003. Agriculture’s contribution was helped by a record cotton crop in 2005. Industrial performance has improved over the last, with significant contributions from machinery, chemicals, and metals, in good part based on larger export sales. Also noncommodity export recorded strong growth. In September 2007, the Government of Uzbekistan formally adopted its first Welfare Improvement Strategy (WIS), covering the period 2008–10, and transmitted the document to the World Bank (International Development Association – IDA) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The strategy accords a somewhat greater role to market principles and describes measures to undertake structural reforms. There is a particular emphasis on improving the business environment; it also provides a more candid assessment of economic and social challenges facing the country. Trade policy remains restrictive. Effective rates of protection against consumer imports are significant and excise tax rates on a wide range of consumer imports are higher than on domestic goods. Other regulatory “behind-the-border” barriers to trade include the regulation of wholesale and retail trade affecting the domestic marketing of imports. This regime imposes a heavy regulatory burden on individual entrepreneurs, in particular cross-border shuttle traders, who are an important source of supply for the private sector and contributes to the adverse investment environment. The poor business climate is reflected by the limited amount of FDI inflows estimated at $ 200 million in 2005 (1.5% of GDP). Future FDI inflows however will be buoyed through hydrocarbons investments from the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation.
PURPOSE: to make Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan eligible for financing under the Community’s European Investment Bank (EIB) guarantee.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Decisions.
BACKGROUND: in June 2007, the European Council requested the development of a new EU Central Asia strategy to serve as an overall framework for EU relations with Central Asia. The Strategy, based upon common interests, defines the EU's priorities for its cooperation with the region as a whole, with implementation tailored to the specific requirements and performance of each Central Asian country. In order to intensify cooperation with the Central Asian countries, the Strategy requires that interaction between the EU and the Central Asian countries be strengthened vis-à-vis the international financial institutions, including the World Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). The European Investment Bank (EIB) should play an important role in the financing projects of interest to the EU in Central Asia. Existing EU legislation specifies that EIB activity in Central Asia should focus on major energy supply and energy transport projects with cross-border implications. Central Asia , with its significant hydrocarbon resources and favourable geographical location for transport routes to European markets, has the potential to play an important role in ensuring the EU's energy supplies.
In 2006, the EU adopted Council Decision 2006/1016/EC granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans and loan guarantees for projects outside the Community. Under the terms of this Decision, countries which have been marked with an asterisk (*) in Annex I can only become eligible for EIB financing under the Community following a decision by the Council on a case by case basis and in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 181a (2) of the Treaty. All five of the Central Asian countries to whom this proposal is addressed fall under this category.
CONTENT: bearing the above in mind, the purpose of this proposal is to establish the eligibility of five Central Asian countries, namely Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, for EIB financing under Council Decision 2006/1016/EC. Any future EIB activity in the five Central Asian countries will be fully compatible with EBRD activities as well as activities under the remit of: the Black Sea Trade and Development Bank, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the International Finance cooperation; and the Nordic Investment Bank, thanks to a number of Memorandums of Understanding that have been signed.
The Commission, in spite of Parliamentary attempts to nullify this choice before the European Court of Justice, has decided to maintain Article 181a of the Treaty establishing the European Community as the sole legal basis of this legislative initiative and not to share the legal basis of the proposal with Article 179 (an instrument of development policy) as requested by Parliament. This is fully in line with Article 2 of Council Decision 2006/1016/EC. The Parliament has asked the European Court of Justice - should it decide in favour of an annulment - to uphold the effects of Council Decision 2006/1016/EC until a new Decision has been adopted.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Decision 2008/847
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 301 12.11.2008, p. 0013
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)6073
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0403/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0317/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0317/2008
- Committee opinion: PE407.774
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE409.492
- Committee draft report: PE407.683
- Legislative proposal: COM(2008)0172
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)0417
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2008)0172
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: COM(2008)0172 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)0417 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE407.683
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE409.492
- Committee opinion: PE407.774
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0317/2008
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)6073
Votes
Rapport Seppänen A6-0317/2008 - am. 10 #
Rapport Seppänen A6-0317/2008 - am. 11 #
Rapport Seppänen A6-0317/2008 - résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
18 |
2008/0067(CNS)
2008/06/26
INTA
1 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 4 a (new) (4a) The EIB should consider the introduction, implementation and monitoring of clear environmental and social standards and safeguards when operating outside the EU.
source: PE-409.434
2008/07/02
BUDG
17 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 3 - having regard to its resolution of 20 February 2008 on an EU Strategy for Central Asia, and in particular paragraphs 21, 22, and 64 thereof,
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Turkmenistan should become eligible in practice for Community guarantees only once it has made progress in relation to clear benchmarks regarding respect for human rights as specified in the European Parliament resolution of 20 February 2008 on an EU strategy for Central Asia. Uzbekistan should not be eligible in practice for consideration until EU sanctions are lifted.
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 5 a (new) (5a) Account needs to be taken of the specific problems encountered by Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan in terms of stability issues arising from problems linked to energy acquisition.
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 5 b (new) (5b) Lending activities should support the EU's policy objective to promote stability in the region in addition to the necessary support for energy supply and energy transport projects which serve EU energy interests.
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 1. Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 1. Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 a (new) Article 1a The guarantee agreement between the Commission and the EIB, as foreseen in Article 8 of Council Decision 2006/1016/EC, shall lay down the detailed provisions and procedures relating to the Community guarantee and shall contain conditions with clear benchmarks regarding respect for human rights, especially as regards Turkmenistan. Investments shall be geared solely towards projects that are not effectively controlled by the state or state entities as long as the benchmarks relating to human rights are not achieved.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 a (new) Article 1a On the basis of the information received from the EIB, the Commission shall produces an assessment and a report, on an annual basis, to be forwarded to the European Parliament and the Council, on the EIB financing operations carried out under this Decision. The report should include an assessment of the contribution of the EIB financing operations to the achievement of the external policy objectives of the EU and especially the contribution to the general objective of developing and consolidating democracy and the rule of law, the objective of respecting human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the observance of international environmental agreements to which the European Community or its Member States are parties.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 b (new) Article 1b The EIB shall ensure that framework agreements between the Bank and the countries concerned are made available to the public at least 60 days prior to Board approval, and that adequate and timely objective information is made available to enable them to play a full part in the decision making process.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 2 a (new) (2a) The five countries of Central Asia are eligible in principle for EIB financing on a case by case basis in accordance with Council Decision 2006/1016/EC.
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 2 a (new) (2a) Given the political risk and credit risk situations in the respective countries that are crucial for the Community exposure to guarantee payment as envisaged in Article 5 of Decision 2006/1016/EC, the EIB’s operations in each of the Central Asia countries should be conditional upon progress on human rights and freedom of speech and association issues and on the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals as specified in EU Partnership and Cooperation Agreements.
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 3 a (new) (3a) There is an acknowledged need for EIB lending in Central Asia to focus on energy supply and energy transport projects which serve EU energy interests.
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 3 a (new) (3a) Regarding energy supply and transport projects, EIB financing operations in Central Asia should be consistent with and support the EU policy objectives of diversification of energy sources and the Kyoto requirements, and of enhancement of environmental protection.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 3 b (new) Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 3 c (new) (3c) The EIB should ensure that individual projects are subject to a Sustainability Impact Assessment carried out independently of the project sponsors and the EIB, and made available to the public at least 60 days prior to any loan decision by the Bank, and that residents in the area concerned receive adequate and timely information so that they have the possibility of playing a full part in the decision making process, before framework agreements are concluded between the Bank and the countries concerned.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 4 (4) The macro-economic conditions prevailing in the Central Asian countries, and in particular the situation of external finances and debt sustainability, have improved in the recent years as a result of strong economic growth and prudent macroeconomic policies, and
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 4 (4) The macro-economic conditions prevailing in the Central Asian countries, and in particular the situation of external finances and debt sustainability, have improved in the recent years as a result of
source: PE-409.492
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0417/COM_SEC(2008)0417_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0417/COM_SEC(2008)0417_EN.pdf |
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE407.774&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-407774_EN.html |
events/0/date |
Old
2008-04-07T00:00:00New
2008-04-06T00:00:00 |
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=CNS&year=2008&number=0067&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=CNS&year=2008&number=0067&appLng=EN |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0417/COM_SEC(2008)0417_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0417/COM_SEC(2008)0417_EN.pdf |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.683New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE407.683 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.492New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE409.492 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.774&secondRef=02New
http://nullEN&reference=PE407.774&secondRef=02 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0317_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0317_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15399&j=0&l=en
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0172/COM_COM(2008)0172_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0172/COM_COM(2008)0172_EN.pdf |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0317_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0317_EN.html |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0417/COM_SEC(2008)0417_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0417/COM_SEC(2008)0417_EN.pdf |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-317&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0317_EN.html |
docs/5/body |
EC
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-317&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0317_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-403New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0403_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
BUDG/6/61557New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32008D0847New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32008D0847 |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 181A
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 181
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/8/docs/1/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2008:301:TOCNew
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:301:SOM:EN:HTML |
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|