Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | TRAN | PIECYK Willi ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | PECH | ||
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | REGI | MARQUES Sérgio ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | ITRE |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
- 3.15 Fisheries policy
- 3.20.03 Maritime transport: passengers and freight
- 3.20.03.01 Maritime safety
- 3.20.09 Ports policy
- 3.40.04 Shipbuilding, nautical industry
- 3.60 Energy policy
- 3.70.05 Marine and coastal pollution, pollution from ships, oil pollution
- 3.70.20 Sustainable development
- 4.70 Regional policy
Events
The EU Integrated Maritime Policy (IMP) has established itself as new approach to enhance the optimal development of all sea-related activities in a sustainable manner. It has confirmed the vision that, by joining up policies towards seas and oceans, Europe can draw much higher returns from them with a far lesser impact on the environment.
Essentially the framework provided by the IMP seeks to achieve (and has started to do so)
four objectives:
to promote integration of governance structures by making them more inclusive and cooperative; to build the knowledge base and cross cutting tools necessary to enable the implementation of integrated policies; to improve the quality of sectoral policies, through an active search for synergies and increased coherence across sectors; in implementing all above, to take account of specificities of the regional seas around Europe, through tailor-made solutions.
When it endorsed the EU IMP and the Blue Paper ( SEC(2007)1278 ), the European Council of 14 December 2007 asked the Commission to report within two years on the achievements of the policy. The present Communication sums up these achievements and charts the course for the next phase of the IMP. It also highlights how joined-up policy-making towards our seas, maritime sectors and coastal areas can contribute to addressing challenges posed by the current global economic crisis and by the need to take decisive action against climate change and environmental degradation.
The implementation of the Action plan has progressed well. Of the 65 actions in the plan, 56 have been launched or completed (mostly in the form of Commission or Council acts). On 9 actions various initiatives have been undertaken, although no formal documents are adopted yet. Following the first phase, the Commission and Member States are now focusing efforts on effective implementation on the ground , with additional activities in all relevant policy areas pursued where needed.
The report notes that the last two years have confirmed the IMP as a highly promising policy providing a significant contribution to growth, jobs and environmental sustainability for Europe’s coastal areas and beyond. Despite its young age, this new EU policy has already changed the way in which Europe deals with its maritime and coastal assets.
The Commission considers that these objectives will be best achieved through a combination of progress in six strategic directions :
Integrated maritime governance must be further enhanced. The progress registered over recent years needs to be turned into effective integrated structures at all levels of government. EU institutions, Member States and coastal regions have a particular responsibility in ensuring upstream policy integration and in adopting coherent, joined up agendas for maritime affairs, further counteracting the prevalence of isolated sectoral policy thinking. Stakeholder involvement in maritime policy-making should also be enshrined more permanently in governance structures. This should also lead to a more intense dialogue between the EU, Member State's Governments and coastal regions, which often hold key expertise necessary for an integrated approach to Maritime Affairs. For the same reason the formation of a crosssectoral platform for stakeholder dialogue on maritime affairs should be supported. Cross-cutting policy tools are of utmost importance to enhance economic development, environmental monitoring, safety, security and law enforcement on Europe’s oceans and seas. In particular, maritime spatial planning, in combination with increased marine knowledge, can unblock considerable economic investment and drastically improve the way we manage our maritime spaces, preserving their ecosystems. It must become a practical instrument on all relevant levels of governance , including with the relevant mechanisms to ensure joined-up decision-making over cross-border investments. The integration of maritime surveillance has the potential of making a difference to the way key policy objectives such as the fight against illegal immigration, the safeguard of commercial shipping and the protection of natural resources are carried out by national authorities. Member States and the Commission will have to continue to work together on these items so that the processes which were initiated in the last two years will bear their intended fruit. The definition of the boundaries of sustainability of human activities that have an impact on the marine environment in the years ahead, in the framework of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive , will provide clarity and design a platform for the successful development of all maritime activities, paying due attention to their cumulative impacts. Hence, the implementation of this Directive will remain a key objective of the IMP, which should also develop the necessary cooperation between all relevant sectors and services to this end, including inter-alia between marine science and the marine environment policy. Sea-basin strategies are key to a successful implementation of the IMP. This is where the priorities and the tools of the policy can be adapted to the specific geographic, economic and political contexts of each large maritime region. Co-operation with and among Member States and regions sharing a sea basin is a crucial element of success and, whenever necessary, this should be accompanied with proper dialogue with third countries sharing a sea basin with the EU. Action at the level of sub-basins can also be useful in establishing positive examples and best practices. The international dimension of the IMP will also require more attention, as illustrated by the dedicated Communication published together with this report. Europe must take a leading role in improving global maritime governance, as it has done in the matter of piracy or with regard to destructive fishing practices. The Commission intends to strengthen dialogue with a limited number of major maritime partners and its participation in international fora and informal processes. Renewed focus on economic growth, employment and innovation , in the present context of economic downturn, the implementation of the IMP should explore synergies between the European Energy Policy and the IMP, promoting energy generation from the sea, including renewable forms of energy, and use the sea more for energy transportation through pipelines, underwater grids and vessels. It will also be necessary to further link the EU's Climate Change Policy with IMP, by developing a strategy for adaptation to climate change in coastal and maritime areas, aiming at protecting coastal infrastructure and preserving marine biodiversity. As part of the developing debate on territorial cohesion, it will be important to ensure that maritime and coastal areas are fully taken into account.
The EU will also have to promote better maritime transport in order to foster co-modality , to implement the concept of the Motorways of the Sea , and to improve the EU programme for short sea shipping .
Still aiming at the economic development of maritime activities, it will be necessary to find ways and means of further stimulating maritime employment and investment in EU–flagged shipping, while remaining determined to advance the idea of clean ships . Indeed, support for innovation and research towards very low or even zero emission ships will continue to be a major part of the Community's response to the strategically important shipbuilding sector.
Lastly, the Commission is examining the future funding needs that IMP-related actions may involve as part of its overall reflection on the next financial perspective. The Commission intends to produce in 2010 a policy document detailing projects and initiatives aimed at further developing the above six strategic directions, following consultations with stakeholders.
The European Parliament adopted by 587 votes to 20, with 38 abstentions, a resolution on an integrated maritime policy for the European Union, in response to the Commission’s communication on the subject.
The own-initiative report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Willi PIECYK (PES, DE) on behalf of the Committee on Transport and Tourism.
While MEPs welcome the Commission’s communication, they take the overall view that the Action Plan includes too few practical measures . The Commission is invited to be more ambitious in future in using the instruments at its disposal under the Treaties. MEPs regret the fact that the Action Plan addresses the challenges of climate change only in a non-binding way : in their opinion, one task of a European maritime policy has to be to lay down the adjustment measures required, as a matter of urgency, especially in view of the melting of glaciers leading to the rise in sea levels, together with the increased risk of flooding of ports and coastal regions. As a result, they welcome the Commission's intention to put forward an Arctic Initiative and call on the scientific community and decision makers to further explore possibilities for protecting the polar ice caps.
The Resolution recalls that maritime policy must make a substantial contribution to reducing greenhouse gas emissions , notably by incorporating shipping into the emissions trading scheme and enhancing research efforts both with regard to exploiting the seas as a source of renewable energy and with a view to developing cleaner new ship propulsion technologies. It calls emphatically on the Commission to be more ambitious in combating sulphur and nitrogen oxide emissions, as well as solid waste from ships, and to cooperate more closely with the International Maritime Organization (IMO), which particularly concerns:
introducing nitrogen oxide emission standards for ships using EU ports; designating the Mediterranean Sea, the Black Sea and the North-East Atlantic as Sulphur Emission Control Areas (SECAs) under the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL Convention); reducing the maximum permitted sulphur content in marine fuels used in SECAs by passenger vessels from 1,5 % to 0,5 %; introducing fiscal measures, such as taxes or charges on sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions from ships and identifying ways of imposing such measures and charges on all ships, regardless of flag, putting into Community ports or sailing within the waters of EU Member States; promoting the introduction of differentiated harbour and waterway charges to favour ships with low sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions; gradually introducing a requirement for ships at ports to use land-based electricity; proposing an EU directive on the quality of marine fuels.
MEPs point out that land-based pollution of the seas constitutes a significant proportion of overall maritime pollution and that the Commission has so far not got to grips with this issue. They reiterate their call for the Commission to put forward an action plan to reduce such pollution, and call for the Member States to act promptly to transpose the legislation in this field, such as the water framework Directive, into national law. They also urge the Commission to help Member States to launch a plan to survey and map wrecked ships and submerged archaeological sites – since these form part of the Community's historic and cultural heritage.
The Resolution welcomes the Commission's stocktaking with regard to the exclusion of seafarers from a number of areas of European social and labour protection rules (e.g. collective redundancies, the safeguarding of employees' rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, the informing, consulting and posting of workers). MEPs propose that these directives be revised in close cooperation with the social partners. They urge those Member States which have not yet done so to ratify, as soon as possible, the Maritime Labour Convention (2006) adopted with a view to improving the living and working conditions of seafarers and to preventing unfair competition in the shipping industry by updating and codifying the entire body of international labour standards in force.
In terms of international piracy , MEPs call upon the Commission and the Member States to actively support, in the framework of the UN and the IMO, the initiative promoted by several Member States, to extend the right of sea and air pursuit to the territorial waters of the coastal states, provided the countries concerned agree, as well as to develop a mechanism of mutual assistance against cases of maritime piracy. The Commission is called to set up a Community system for coordination and mutual assistance, which would allow naval vessels flying the flag of a Member State deployed in international waters, to protect fishing and merchant vessels from other Member States.
In the fishing sector, the key objective of the integrated maritime policy for the European Union should be to promote the modernisation and sustainable, balanced and fair development of the industry. MEPs are of the opinion that creating more and better seafaring jobs, particularly in the fishing industry, also depends on a guarantee of a fair and adequate income, proper working conditions (including health and safety) and access to training for people working in the industry. Member States are asked to work towards the mutual recognition of intermediate diplomas for the occupations of steersman and mechanic for fishing vessels.
Lastly, MEPs su pport the proposal to establish an annual ' European Maritime Day ', which should be used to highlight the significance of maritime policy outside maritime circles, with the participation of ordinary citizens, schools, universities and non-governmental organisations.
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the own-initiative report by Willi PIECYK (PES, DE) on an integrated maritime policy for the European Union, in response to a communication on this subject.
While welcoming the Commission’s communication, MEPs believe that, on the whole, the Action Plan includes too few practical measures . The Commission is called to be more ambitious in future in using the instruments at its disposal under the Treaties. MEPs also regret the fact that the Action Plan addresses the challenges of climate change only in a non-binding way : in their opinion, one task of the European maritime policy has to be to lay down, as a matter of urgency, the adjustment measures required, especially in view of the melting of glaciers leading to the rise in sea levels, together with the increased risk of flooding of ports and coastal regions. In this respect, they call for all relevant policies, and research policy in particular, to play their part.
The parliamentary committee reaffirms its call for maritime policy to make a substantial contribution to reducing greenhouse gas emissions , in particular by incorporating shipping into emissions trading and enhancing research efforts both with regard to exploiting the seas as a source of renewable energy and with a view to developing new, cleaner ship propulsion technologies. It calls emphatically on the Commission to be more ambitious in combating sulphur and nitrogen oxide emissions, as well as solid waste from ships, and to cooperate more closely with the IMO (International Maritime Organisation) on this issue.
MEPs point out that land-based pollution of the seas constitutes a significant proportion of overall maritime pollution in Europe and indicate the absence of a solution to this issue from the Commission. They reiterate their call for the Commission to put forward an action plan to reduce such pollution, and ask Member States to act promptly to transpose the legislation in this field, such as the water framework directive. They also urge the Commission to help Member States to launch a plan to survey and map wrecked ships and submerged archaeological sites since these form part of the Community’s historic and cultural heritage.
The report welcomes the Commission's stocktaking with regard to the exclusion of seafarers from a number of areas of European social and labour protection rules . MEPs propose that these directives be revised in close cooperation with the social partners. They urge those Member States which have not yet done so to ratify, as soon as possible, the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, adopted with a view to improving the living and working conditions of seafarers and to preventing unfair competition in the shipping industry by updating and codifying the entire body of international labour standards in force .
In the fishing sector , the key objective of the maritime policy for the European Union should be to promote the modernisation and sustainable, balanced and fair development of the industry. MEPs believe that creating more and better seafaring jobs, particularly in the fishing industry, also depends on a guarantee of a fair and adequate income, proper working conditions (including health and safety) and access to training for people working in the industry. Member States are called to mutually recognise intermediate diplomas for the occupations of steersman and mechanic for fishing vessels.
The report emphatically supports the Commission's intention to exploit the potential of short sea shipping and inland waterway transport between the Member States and to integrate this rapidly into the single market. In addition, it welcomes the Commission’s intention to speed up its proposals for a common maritime transport area together with a comprehensive maritime transport strategy for 2008-2018.
Lastly, MEPs support the proposal to establish an annual ' European Maritime Day ', which should be used to highlight the significance of maritime policy outside maritime circles, with the participation of ordinary citizens, schools, universities and non-governmental organisations.
PURPOSE: to set out an “Integrated Maritime Policy” for the EU.
CONTENT: Europe’s maritime spaces and its coasts are central to its well-being and prosperity – they are Europe’s trade routes, climate regulator, source of food, energy and resources, and a favoured site for recreational and residence purposes. Yet the strain is showing and Europe stands at a cross-roads. The accumulated effect of over-activity in the maritime spaces is leading to conflicts of use and to a deterioration in the marine environment. In the face of rapid globalisation and climate change the need for Europe to address these challenges is great.
In a bid to address these challenges the Commission held a series of consultation exercises on how Europe relates to the sea. Based on the results of this exercise the Commission, in this report, sets out its vision of an “Integrated Maritime Policy” for the EU. This policy is based on the assumption that all matters relating to Europe’s oceans and seas are interlinked and that sea-related policies must be developed in order to reap the desired results.
The integrated policy will:
Alter the way policies are adopted and decisions are made. This requires the development of common tools and the identification of synergies Develop and deliver a programme of work. This will require the differing sectoral polices to develop in a coherent policy framework.
The report lays down a foundation for the governance framework and the cross-sectoral tools needed for an effective Maritime Policy. It also sets out the main actions that the Commission will pursue during the course of this mandate. These actions will be guided by the principles of subsidiarity and competitiveness, the ecosystem approach and stakeholder participation.
As far as the governance framework for a maritime policy is concerned, the application of an integrated approach to Maritime governance (for example, better regulation) is analysed; and the kind of tools needed to deliver an integrated policy-making is set out. Tools that include a European network for maritime surveillance; maritime spatial planning an integrated coastal zone management system (ICZM); and data information.
In terms of the kind of actions that will be undertaken in order to implement the policy, this paper proposes:
Maximising the sustainable use of the oceans and seas : The policy’s first goal will be to create optimal conditions for the sustainable use of the oceans and seas. This approach requires a new strategic vision for the development of shipping; the use of European sea ports, shipbuilding, repair and marine equipment industries, maritime jobs and the quality of the marine environment. Building a knowledge and innovation base for the maritime policy : Marine science, technology and research are crucial for the sustainable development of sea-based activities. The development of the Marine Observation and Data Network is an important tool for this strategy. Deliver a high standard and qualify of living in coastal region s: Population growth in coastal regions and islands has been double the EU average over the last decade. The coastal regions also absorb large numbers of European tourists. Regional authorities and coastal communities have an important role to play in the regulation of coastal and maritime activities. The Committee of the Regions, coastal regions and their networks are thus key partners in the development of an EU Integrated Maritime Policy. Promote Europe’s leadership in International Maritime Affairs : The EU will work towards a more efficient international governance of maritime affairs and effective enforcement of international maritime law. It will urge the Member States to ratify any relevant instruments and will promote the coordination of European interests in key international fora. Raise Europe’s maritime visibility . The integrated Maritime policy will seek to raise the visibility of a Maritime Europe and improve the image of maritime activities and the seafaring professions. It will also seek to promote Europe’s maritime heritage, support maritime communities, support traditional skills and promote links between the various maritime communities.
To conclude this Communication, the Commission notes that an integrated maritime policy has the support of the Council which invited the Commission to present an Action Plan. Through this Communication and Action Plan the Commission has responded to this request whilst taking account of the views and opinions expressed by interested parties during the consultation round.
The Commission presented a communication on the conclusions from the consultation on a European maritime policy which followed the adoption of the Green Paper on Maritime Policy.
The consultation lasted one year and received a response that was unprecedented both in terms of the scope and in the depth of the participation in the consultation process. The Commission received over 490 contributions and over 230 events were held where maritime policy was discussed with stakeholders.
The main conclusions are as follows:
The Search for Added Value: stakeholders are in favour of an integrated approach to Maritime Policy in the European Union, because it integrates the needs and concerns of linked sectors that are currently dealt with in separate policy activities. The consultation process confirms the scope for developing the relationship between those who live and work in day-to-day contact with the seas, including seafarers and fishermen, as well as other related sectors of economic activity. Operators point out the need for the integration of systems and standards in the area of maritime monitoring and surveillance. Researchers point to the economic benefits of the combined use of expensive assets for their work.
Certain stakeholders urge that the development of an integrated approach should not lead the EU to re- or over-regulate, or to over-centralise. A significant number do not want to see an integrated policy change existing competences.
Subsidiarity means Responsibility: The response to the Green Paper confirms that a European Maritime Policy must build on the existing distribution of competences within the EU. The subsidiarity principle and the involvement of stakeholders will play a key role in the future initiatives taken in the area of the EU’s maritime policy.
The European Union's role is seen as facilitator rather than integrator per se. This is particularly the case as far as spatial planning and offshore government activities are concerned. There is little support for a European Coast Guard, but there is interest in cooperation between Member States' assets to achieve similar objectives without changing competences.
Much emphasis has been placed on the necessity that existing policies and legal frameworks are better implemented and interact in a more consistent way. Calls were made in favour of specific regulatory initiatives in order to close gaps in EU legislation. The broad participation of local and regional government bodies indicates an enthusiasm to learn from others, share experience and contribute ideas. Industry, on the other hand, calls for less regulation and more self-regulation.
Global Issues and Responsibilities: the global nature of maritime activities, such as shipping and fisheries, became apparent in the course of the consultation. Several stakeholders thought that the EU should promote measures to protect the global ecosystem, including on the high seas.
Here, the majority of stakeholders agree on the need for multilateral rules and standards and their implementation and enforcement. Views on how to achieve this differ; some insist on developing standards only in the multilateral context, and are opposed to the EU developing standards first. However, a significant number of stakeholders believe that the EU has an important role to play in leading by example.
The consultation process thus confirms the importance of developing an international dimension to a European Maritime Policy. Stakeholders want to ensure that the current system is used to its fullest extent before trying out new solutions.
Sustainable Use of Resources: t he consultation process highlights how much Europe's prosperity relies on the availability of safe and efficient shipping services. Stakeholders agree that European shipping services and ports are sectors with high growth potential and that the EU's international and internal performance in the maritime sectors is built on delivering higher quality – not in being cheaper. The technologies of the future will be crucial building blocks for a more sustainable economy, e.g. the development of renewable energy, in particular wind and wave energy.
The consultation process has revealed strong support for the better collection and use of (real-time and other) data on oceans and seas. There is a need for high standards to ensure high quality and thus competitiveness, and standards that support sustainability. Industry points out that competitiveness on the basis of high standards will only work if these standards are applied across the board, securing a level playing field. They also point out that voluntary approaches may sometimes bring better results than prescriptive regulation.
Stakeholders indicate that there is scope for improvement in skills and training. There are divergences on whether, and which, exclusions concerning maritime sectors in EU social legislation are justified, but there is agreement on the need to contribute to a global level playing field for the sector and the role that EU legislation can play in this context.
There is very little dispute about the need to set up marine protected areas – but there is discussion about their designation. The development of blue biotechnology or other uses of genetic resources is seen as an opportunity, demonstrating the need for an integrated approach linking research, sustainability, and international rule-making. Stakeholders point out that up to 80% of the pollution of the marine environment is land-based and call for more action on this.
The importance of linkages between existing environmental instruments and the implementation of the marine thematic strategy is mentioned. Coherence and compatibility are underscored as essential for the implementation of all these instruments. Some stakeholders highlight the need to go beyond the Marine Thematic Strategy to embrace broader environment protection objectives, while others want to ensure that the impacts of environmental measures and legislation take economic priorities duly into account.
Working on the basis of ecosystems and eco-regions is fundamental for the sustainable management of sea and coastal spaces. Stakeholders point to the need for cooperation between coastal regions and neighbouring Member States – as well as neighbouring countries. There are many voices calling for a stronger integration of environmental concerns within fisheries combined with stronger integration of fisheries within maritime policy. Lastly, according to stakeholders, without improvements in training, working conditions and job opportunities for fishermen, developing a sustainable approach to fisheries is not realistic.
Maritime Management: stakeholders emphasise the need for coordinated management and planning for competing uses of the seas. They agree that maritime spatial planning would be a good tool to apply across the EU, but should remain a Member State competence.
The initiative to develop a European Data Network is generally welcomed, and many proposals are made as to practical ways and means of taking on this task. Very few stakeholders dispute the potential to achieve cost savings through standardisation, interlinking and communication between existing sectoral systems.
Regional stakeholders, including the Committee of the Regions, call, for the adoption of specific and targeted approaches to funding in coastal regions, through more transparency, and the linking of existing financial tools, under the umbrella of a European Coastal Fund.
Europeans and the Sea: Participation and Involvement: contributions call for consultation and dialogue, and for more information to be made available to all affected by maritime policy.
Individual citizens and civil society respond with mixed messages. There is some concern that the EU should not take over national or local competences but overall the reactions indicate of the public's concern for the planet's marine ecosystem and their impression that insufficient government action is being taken against practices that damage it.
T here is a general consensus that the overall image of the maritime sectors needs to be enhanced. Ideas abound for the organisation of exchanges of best practice, conferences, the involvement of experts in th e maritime world, such as fishermen, or small-scale projects aimed at informing local communities or tourists.
PURPOSE: to set out an “Integrated Maritime Policy” for the EU.
CONTENT: Europe’s maritime spaces and its coasts are central to its well-being and prosperity – they are Europe’s trade routes, climate regulator, source of food, energy and resources, and a favoured site for recreational and residence purposes. Yet the strain is showing and Europe stands at a cross-roads. The accumulated effect of over-activity in the maritime spaces is leading to conflicts of use and to a deterioration in the marine environment. In the face of rapid globalisation and climate change the need for Europe to address these challenges is great.
In a bid to address these challenges the Commission held a series of consultation exercises on how Europe relates to the sea. Based on the results of this exercise the Commission, in this report, sets out its vision of an “Integrated Maritime Policy” for the EU. This policy is based on the assumption that all matters relating to Europe’s oceans and seas are interlinked and that sea-related policies must be developed in order to reap the desired results.
The integrated policy will:
Alter the way policies are adopted and decisions are made. This requires the development of common tools and the identification of synergies Develop and deliver a programme of work. This will require the differing sectoral polices to develop in a coherent policy framework.
The report lays down a foundation for the governance framework and the cross-sectoral tools needed for an effective Maritime Policy. It also sets out the main actions that the Commission will pursue during the course of this mandate. These actions will be guided by the principles of subsidiarity and competitiveness, the ecosystem approach and stakeholder participation.
As far as the governance framework for a maritime policy is concerned, the application of an integrated approach to Maritime governance (for example, better regulation) is analysed; and the kind of tools needed to deliver an integrated policy-making is set out. Tools that include a European network for maritime surveillance; maritime spatial planning an integrated coastal zone management system (ICZM); and data information.
In terms of the kind of actions that will be undertaken in order to implement the policy, this paper proposes:
Maximising the sustainable use of the oceans and seas : The policy’s first goal will be to create optimal conditions for the sustainable use of the oceans and seas. This approach requires a new strategic vision for the development of shipping; the use of European sea ports, shipbuilding, repair and marine equipment industries, maritime jobs and the quality of the marine environment. Building a knowledge and innovation base for the maritime policy : Marine science, technology and research are crucial for the sustainable development of sea-based activities. The development of the Marine Observation and Data Network is an important tool for this strategy. Deliver a high standard and qualify of living in coastal region s: Population growth in coastal regions and islands has been double the EU average over the last decade. The coastal regions also absorb large numbers of European tourists. Regional authorities and coastal communities have an important role to play in the regulation of coastal and maritime activities. The Committee of the Regions, coastal regions and their networks are thus key partners in the development of an EU Integrated Maritime Policy. Promote Europe’s leadership in International Maritime Affairs : The EU will work towards a more efficient international governance of maritime affairs and effective enforcement of international maritime law. It will urge the Member States to ratify any relevant instruments and will promote the coordination of European interests in key international fora. Raise Europe’s maritime visibility . The integrated Maritime policy will seek to raise the visibility of a Maritime Europe and improve the image of maritime activities and the seafaring professions. It will also seek to promote Europe’s maritime heritage, support maritime communities, support traditional skills and promote links between the various maritime communities.
To conclude this Communication, the Commission notes that an integrated maritime policy has the support of the Council which invited the Commission to present an Action Plan. Through this Communication and Action Plan the Commission has responded to this request whilst taking account of the views and opinions expressed by interested parties during the consultation round.
Documents
- Follow-up document: SEC(2009)1343
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2009)0540
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)4116
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)3593/2
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0213/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0163/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0163/2008
- Committee opinion: PE400.644
- Committee opinion: PE400.597
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE402.775
- Committee draft report: PE400.605
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2007)0575
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: COM(2007)0574
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)1278
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)1279
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)1280
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)1283
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2007)0575
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2007)0575 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: COM(2007)0574 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)1278 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)1279 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)1280 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)1283 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE400.605
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE402.775
- Committee opinion: PE400.597
- Committee opinion: PE400.644
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0163/2008
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)3593/2
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)4116
- Follow-up document: SEC(2009)1343 EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2009)0540 EUR-Lex
Activities
- Willi PIECYK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Pedro GUERREIRO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Mechtild ROTHE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- John ATTARD-MONTALTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paulo CASACA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Emanuel Jardim FERNANDES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ian HUDGHTON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Georg JARZEMBOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rumiana JELEVA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anne E. JENSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Fernand LE RACHINEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marusya LYUBCHEVA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jamila MADEIRA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sérgio MARQUES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rosa MIGUÉLEZ RAMOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ashley MOTE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Robert NAVARRO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Seán Ó NEACHTAIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Athanasios PAFILIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ioan Mircea PAŞCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paweł Bartłomiej PISKORSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Luís QUEIRÓ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Struan STEVENSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Catherine STIHLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Rapport Piecyk A6-0163/2008 - am. 1 #
Rapport Piecyk A6-0163/2008 - résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
89 |
2008/2009(INI)
2008/03/05
REGI
18 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Applauds the Commission’s decision to develop an integrated maritime policy to face the challenges of climate change (inter alia by developing maritime energy capacity), globalisation, regional development, competitiveness, protection of the marine environment and safety and security, one which incorporates many of the ideas outlined by Parliament;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Whilst acknowledging the competence of the Member States in this field, awaits with interest the publication by the Commission of a road map to facilitate the development by Member States of maritime spatial planning; points to the need to maintain economic, social, territorial, and environmental considerations in a proper balance;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Maintains that sound management of the seas requires sound management of coastal areas and that construction projects on EU coasts must therefore allow in every case for the consequences of climate change and the resulting rise in the sea level, the erosion of sands, and the increase in the frequency and violence of storms; insists that no new nuclear plants or other facilities should ever be built in coastal areas when observance of the precautionary principle, and the principle of environmental sustainability, might be placed in jeopardy;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Maintains that a genuine European maritime transport space without barriers requires that the EU’s coastal regions, islands, and outermost regions be made safer from the point of view of development and environmental sustainability;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Urges the institutions involved to adopt the Erika III maritime package as quickly as possible and calls on the Member States to start implementing the package without delay, with a view to providing the legal means necessary to avert or remedy accidents or incidents with disastrous consequences for the development of maritime regions, the Erika and Prestige accidents being two such examples;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Points out that the exceptional maritime dimension which the outermost regions bring to the EU offers unique opportunities as regards innovation, research, the environment, biodiversity, and other areas, and that the future integrated European maritime policy has to capitalise on them; points out that, as regards transport and the EU’s external security, these regions provide excellent communication bases;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Points out that the exceptional maritime dimension which coastal regions, islands, and the outermost regions bring to the EU offers unique opportunities as regards innovation, research, the environment, biodiversity, and other areas, and that the future integrated European maritime policy has to capitalise on them; recognises the desirability of setting up centres of excellence and recommends that encouragement and support be given to the university research centres already existing in coastal areas;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. In the light of the recent accidents concerning oil tankers, and the ensuing environmental harm, emphasises the need for clear guidelines on seafaring and for international cooperation aimed at encouraging third countries to apply the same or similar rules;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Supports the Commission’s intention to consolidate a maritime Europe, thus creating the image of a dynamic, responsible Europe committed to protecting and promoting the seas not just in relation to outsiders, but also within the EU itself;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Points to the importance of wave power as an alternative clean energy source and calls on the Commission to take this form of energy into account in future action plans;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Considers the involvement of regional and local partners to be essential in order to make a success of the European maritime policy; maintains, therefore, that there has to be closer cooperation and interconnection between European coastal regions, to be achieved by promoting coordinated strategies to foster development and competitiveness and by dovetailing the different tiers of governance more effectively;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the Commission Action Plan outlined in its communication on Integrated Maritime Policy (COM(2007)0575) and in the accompanying documents (SEC(2007)1278), (SEC(2007)1279) and (SEC(2007)1280) and in particular the Commission’s strategy to mitigate the effects of climate change on maritime regions and the concomitant effects on tourism; draws attention to the need for further adjustments to that strategy to allow for the specific features of maritime regions;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the future maritime policy could help to develop and protect the EU’s coastal regions, islands, and outermost regions; points out that broadening the scope of the maritime policy to encompass a tourism policy for coastal areas would constitute an innovation central to the development and cohesion of those regions;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the future maritime policy could help to develop and protect the EU’s coastal regions, islands, and outermost regions; and draws attention to the wealth of knowledge still to be tapped in these regions, for instance to develop innovative sea-based technologies;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the future maritime policy
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses the key role regional authorities and coastal communities will play in the implementation of the new integrated maritime policy and in the Commission’s forthcoming European Action Plan on sea-based economic activity; emphasises the importance of good-quality transport infrastructure and stresses its positive effects on quality of life and the tourist industry; in this connection, calls on all concerned to work efficiently to ensure the optimal use of development funds;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Points to the effect upon local ecosystems of the increase in economic activity and tourism in coastal regions accompanied by an increase in all forms of transport; welcomes therefore the development of an integrated maritime policy which will address these problems; further calls for better data collection as regards the maritime sector and coastal regions;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Looks forward to the publication of a set of guidelines for Member States on the drawing-up of national integrated maritime
source: PE-402.835
2008/03/12
PECH
14 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that, in order to 'take more into account the welfare of coastal communities' and improve the 'social welfare of workers' in the fishing industry, it is impossible to overlook the serious socio-economic situation facing it, mainly due to the failure to adopt adequate measures
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Calls for mutual recognition by the Member States of intermediate diplomas for steersman/mechanic for fishing vessels;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Reiterates the need to boost support for scientific fisheries research in the various Member States, particularly under the seventh framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls for Community support for the implementation of effective measures to ensure adequate means of evacuation, assistance and rescue for crews;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Calls for support for the installation and modernisation of Member States' own means of surveillance, monitoring and control of their EEZs;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Takes the view that an 'integrated European maritime policy' must not disregard the fact that energy supply and food are strategic necessities and objectives that we must safeguard without exceeding maximum security thresholds as regards external dependence, and that sustainable fisheries and agriculture, as the basic sources of our food, must be protected in the European Union's general interest;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Takes the view that the key objective of the 'integrated European maritime policy' (IEMP) in the field of fisheries should be to promote the modernisation and sustainable, balanced and fair development of the industry throughout the European Union, safeguarding its socio-economic viability and the sustainability of resources and guaranteeing food sovereignty and food security, the supply of fish to the public, job preservation and improved living conditions for fishermen;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Considers that, to date, neither the sustainability of marine resources nor the economic viability of Europe's fishing fleets and coastal communities has been well served by the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and that, accordingly, the IEMP should be developed in such a way as to avoid failings in the CFP such as over-centralisation and the failure to take account of the regional diversity of the EU's waters;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Believes that, given the huge diversity in Europe's waters, coastal communities and fisheries sectors the IEMP must have full regard for the principle of subsidiarity, with particular recognition being given to the constitutional, legal and administrative structures operating within individual Member States;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Points out that by-catches must be returned but makes a distinction in this approach between species of fish and the extent to which they can survive out of water;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 d (new) 2d. Calls for a joint approach by the Member States to the clearance of unexploded munitions brought to the surface by fishing vessels and thrown back to sea after marking;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Believes that 'creating more and better' seafaring jobs, particularly in the fishing industry, also depends on a guarantee of a fair and adequate income
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Proposes studying the current mechanisms by which first-sale prices are set and the way in which they might help to guarantee a balanced remuneration for people working in the industry, without increasing consumer prices;
source: PE-404.386
2008/03/13
TRAN
57 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 6 a (new) - having regard to the provisions laid down in the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, adopted by the International Labour Organisation (ILO) on 23 February 2006, a single instrument encompassing and adapting the maritime labour conventions adopted by the ILO since 1919,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the Commission's intention to improve coordination with the European agencies responsible for maritime surveillance underlining especially the prevention of illegal activities (human and drug trafficking, illegal immigration and terrorist threats) with special focus on international waters;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Welcomes the initiative by the Commission to start a European network for maritime surveillance and promote improved cooperation between Member States´ coastguards; calls on the Commission to come up with the results of the feasibility study on a European coastguard, which was due to be published and presented to the European Parliament and the Council by the end of 2006;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Takes the view that maritime clusters are particularly well-placed to make a contribution to achieving an integrated maritime policy; calls on the Commission to make a prompt start with the project for a European network of maritime clusters;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Supports the proposal to establish an annual 'European Maritime Day'; considers that such an action day should be used to establish the significance of maritime policy outside maritime circles,
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Supports the proposal to establish an annual 'European Maritime Day'; considers that such an action day should be used to establish the significance of maritime policy outside maritime circles, using schools, universities and non-governmental organisations; reminds the Commission of its proposal for a prize to be awarded to exemplary maritime regions as a way of promoting best practice;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses that the integrated European maritime policy is based on a framework requiring Member States to act in cooperation and that drawing up and adopting specific national maritime policies to cover its various aspects is a matter for the Member States, as the Commission has, moreover, pointed out;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Regrets the fact that the Action Plan on European maritime policy addresses the challenges of climate change only in a very non-binding way: reaffirms its view that one task of a European maritime policy has to be to prepare for and to adapt to the consequences of climate change, and in particular the melting of glaciers leading to the rise in sea levels, together with the increased risk of flooding of ports and coastal regions, and in this connection calls for all relevant policies, and in particular research policy, to play their part;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Regrets the fact that the Action Plan on European maritime policy addresses the challenges of climate change only in a very non-binding way: reaffirms its view that one task of a European maritime policy has to be to prepare for the consequences of climate change
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Regrets the fact that the Action Plan on European maritime policy addresses the challenges of climate change only in a very non-binding way: reaffirms its view that one task of a European maritime policy has to be to prepare for the consequences of climate change, and in particular the rise in sea levels, together with the increased risk of flooding of ports
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) – having regard to Article 299(2) of the Treaty,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Recalls the fact that the melting of glaciers causes not only a rise in sea levels but also irreparable damage to human, animal and plant life and therefore welcomes the Commission’s intention to put forward an Arctic Initiative and calls on the scientific community and decision makers to further explore possibilities for protecting the polar ice caps;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Believes that an early warning system should be developed along the Atlantic coast as a means of protection against disasters such as tsunamis;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Maintains that sound management of the seas requires sound management of coastal areas and that construction projects on EU coasts must therefore allow in every case for the consequences of climate change and the resulting rise in the sea level, the erosion of sands, and the increase in the frequency and violence of storms; insists that no new nuclear plants or other facilities should ever be built in coastal areas when observance of the precautionary principle, and the principle of environmental sustainability, might be placed in jeopardy;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Supports the target set by the European Council of March 2007 of halving greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, and reaffirms its call for maritime policy to make a substantial contribution to reducing greenhouse gas emissions; this should include incorporating shipping in
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Supports the target set by the European Council of March 2007 of halving greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, and reaffirms its call for maritime policy to make a substantial contribution to reducing greenhouse gas emissions; this should include incorporating shipping into emissions trading, gearing measures and strategies to the regions, not least the coasts and the outermost regions, and enhancing research efforts with regard to exploiting the seas as a source of renewable energy; considers
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Supports the target set by the European Council of March 2007 of halving greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, and reaffirms its call for maritime policy to make a substantial contribution to reducing greenhouse gas emissions; this should include incorporating shipping into emissions trading and enhancing research efforts both with regard to exploiting the seas as a source of renewable energy and with a view to developing cleaner new ship propulsion technologies; considers that if Europe leads the way in combating climate change this can strengthen and develop Europe’s leading role in environmental technology and research;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Supports the target set by the European Council of March 2007 of halving greenhouse
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Supports the target set by the European Council of March 2007 of halving greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, and reaffirms its call for maritime policy to make a substantial contribution to reducing greenhouse gas emissions; this should include
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Maintains that a genuine European maritime transport area without frontiers requires that the EU’s coastal regions, islands, and outermost regions be made safer from the point of view of development and environmental sustainability;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – introductory part 9.
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas climate change is the greatest challenge of all policies in the 21st century; having regard to the threat posed to coastal regions by the climate-induced rise in sea
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 1 a (new) • reasonable prices to be set for supplies of electricity to ships moored at EU ports, so as to avert situations in which the engines are left running in order to generate energy for a ship’s own consumption, and in that way reduce pollutant emissions from ships;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 2 • the designation of the Mediterranean Sea, the Black Sea and the North-East Atlantic as Sulphur Emission Control Areas (SECAs) under the MARPOL Convention;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 3 • the lowering of the maximum permitted sulphur content in marine fuels used in SECAs, on a world scale, by passenger vessels, regardless of flag, from 1.5 % to
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 4 Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 4 • the introduction of fiscal measures, such as taxes or charges on SO2 and NOx emissions from ships and the identification of ways of imposing such measures and charges on all ships, regardless of flag, putting into Community ports or sailing within the waters of EU Member States;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 5 a (new) • the gradual introduction of a requirement for ships at anchor to use land-based electricity
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Reiterates its call on the Member States and the Commission, in view of the air pollution affecting many port towns and regions, to provide significantly better incentives for the provision of land-based electricity for ships in port; calls, therefore, for a proposal for an amendment to Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity, whereby those Member States which take advantage of the tax exemption on bunker oil pursuant to Article 14 of that directive would be required to exempt land-based electricity from tax to the same extent; the equal treatment for tax purposes of electricity and bunker oil would be a major incentive for ports and ship-owners to help reduce air pollution in port towns by investing in the electricity supply for ships in port;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Welcomes the measures taken to allow satellite tracking of the uncontrolled dumping at sea carried out by certain ships; calls, however, for provisions requiring ships to use black box-type devices whose contents could not be tampered with (models have already been patented), which would enable the levels of liquids pumped into or out of tanks and bilges to be recorded at brief intervals; points out that inspection of records produced by the above means would show whether pollutant oil residues had been dumped outside official control and hence illegally;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Urges the Commission to launch a plan to survey and map wrecked ships and submerged archaeological sites – since these form part of the Community’s historic and cultural heritage – and hence to facilitate understanding and the study of such sites and help prevent the despoliation to which they are being subjected, thus enabling them to be properly preserved;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Urges the institutions involved to adopt the Erika III maritime package as quickly as possible and calls on the Member States to start implementing the package without delay, with a view to providing the legal means necessary to avert or remedy accidents or incidents with disastrous consequences for the development of maritime regions, the Erika and the Prestige accidents being two such examples;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas European Union maritime regions, and particularly its outermost regions, play a very important role regarding safety and security against criminal acts such as illegal immigration, terrorism and smuggling and yet they are exposed to specific environmental disasters,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Considers that the marine strategy framework directive should constitute the environmental cornerstone of the integrated maritime policy. That directive states that regions in which the state of the sea is critical should draw up and implement faster measures to achieve good environmental status. In such regions, it is particularly important that the Commission should coordinate different sectors, programmes and strategies and provide sufficient financial support. To achieve such an integrated maritime policy, it is necessary to include land-based activities such as agriculture, waste water management, transport and energy production. Such regions can constitute pilot areas for a genuine and fully integrated maritime policy;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Welcomes the Commission's measures to strengthen an ecosystem- based procedure within the common fisheries policy and its efforts to promote environment-friendly use of water; stresses the importance of sufficiently far- reaching practical measures to achieve that aim; considers that it is important that the measures are based on scientific studies and that they are geared to local and regional conditions as far as possible;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the Commission to take coherent measures on the protection of transborder ecologically sensitive marine areas and pay particular attention to maritime transport of dangerous and/or polluting goods, that could threaten these areas;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Underlines that the tourism sector in islands and coastal areas has a particular interest in the protection of the marine environment and that tourism policy should also integrate environmental protection of the seas and oceans more fully into its activities;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Acknowledges that coastal regions have a strategic importance for Europe as a whole; notes that the future prosperity of these regions and the competitiveness of their maritime industries are highly susceptible to, and endangered by, spoilt coastal areas, crowded coastal waters, climate system change and the deterioration of the marine environment; proposes, given the extent to which regions are affected by maritime activities and policies, the development of EU standards that ensure long-term environmental sustainability;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Calls for additional measures, including further restrictions and penalties, to ensure safe and secure shipping; notes that maintaining a high level of maritime safety is a precondition for the protection of the economic, social and environmental prosperity of coastal regions;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Urges those Member States which have not yet done so to ratify, as soon as possible, the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, adopted by the International Labour Organisation on 23 February 2006 with a view to improving the living and working conditions of seafarers and to preventing unfair competition in the shipping industry by updating and codifying the entire body of international labour standards in force;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Urges the Commission to update the acquis communautaire, in particular Directive 95/21/EC on port State control and Directive 1999/95/EC on seafarers’ working hours, and the legislation on matters falling under the Commission’s responsibility but not covered, or covered only in part, at Community level, for instance the rules governing temporary recruitment agencies or a worker’s right to have a signed employment contract;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Considers it necessary to meet the demands being made by seafarers for better shipboard working and living conditions, reversing the current trend towards unremitting job cuts and longer working hours; calls in particular for steps to be taken to ensure compliance with the principle of ‘equal pay for equal work’, to rule out discrimination based on seafarers’ places of origin or recruitment, to shorten daily working hours, proceeding from the principle of a 7-hour day and a 5-day, 35-hour week, and to raise crew manning levels for every category of vessel, so as to enable seafarers to carry on their occupation in the proper way; also calls for training for seafarers in all specialist fields to be organised publicly and provided free of charge;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Renews its call for the approach to an integrated European maritime policy to be continued in future and calls on the Commission to strengthen the political framework thereof, as well as the territorial, social, and economic cohesion providing the link to inland Europe and its constituent policies; proposes that a report on European maritime policy be published every two years and that a regular public exchange of views be held with all those involved; calls on future Council presidencies to deal with maritime policy as part of their work programmes; over and above this, calls for all maritime- related projects supported by EU funding to be identified annually by the Commission;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out that the exceptional maritime dimension conferred on the EU by its coasts and its outermost regions offers unique opportunities as regards innovation, research, the environment, and biodiversity, which the integrated European maritime policy has to exploit without fail, and that the outermost regions, moreover, provide excellent communication bases for transport and security purposes at EU and global level;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Welcomes the Commission’s initiative to promote negotiations for better management of sea-sharing with third countries and strongly supports the increased cooperation with neighbouring countries for the protection of seas beyond national jurisdictions;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Believes that the creation of maritime clusters should be encouraged by the Commission and a European network of maritime clusters should be promoted;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 b (new) 12b. Considers that a comprehensive European Strategy for Marine and Maritime research is of major importance and must be properly financed, already within the 7th Research Framework Programme and in future programmes;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 c (new) 12c. Considers that the need to enhance the potential of Blue Biotechnologies must be addressed and therefore supports the idea that the Action Plan should promote the possibility for Member States to create Blue Investment Funds, as initially proposed in the Green paper;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Declares itself in favour of maritime policy being given appropriate consideration in the EU budget
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Declares itself in favour of maritime policy being given appropriate consideration in
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Considers that the concept of a holistic and integrated policy should be promoted and not lost in a multitude of local and individual actions that would only help to increase already existing gaps amongst European maritime regions;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the Commission to say what it means by a ‘sound financial basis’ for the integrated European maritime policy and, proceeding from the principle that new priorities must have new financial resources to match, maintains that the policy should not be financed from the EFF;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Emphatically supports the Commission's intention to exploit the potential of short sea shipping between EU Member States and to integrate this rapidly into the single market and welcomes the Commission’s intention to speed up its proposals for a common maritime transport area;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Emphatically supports the Commission's intention to exploit the potential of short sea shipping and inland waterway transport between EU Member States and to integrate this rapidly into the single market;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Emphatically supports the Commission's intention to exploit the potential of short sea shipping between EU Member States and to integrate this rapidly into
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Encourages Member States to strengthen their cooperation among themselves and with neighbouring countries for the appropriate use of TEN- T and other European financing mechanisms (such as Marco Polo) in order to accomplish the Motorways of the Sea and Short Sea Shipping Networks projects;
source: PE-402.775
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/1 |
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/4/rapporteur |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1278/COM_SEC(2007)1278_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1278/COM_SEC(2007)1278_EN.pdf |
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1280/COM_SEC(2007)1280_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1280/COM_SEC(2007)1280_EN.pdf |
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1283/COM_SEC(2007)1283_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1283/COM_SEC(2007)1283_EN.pdf |
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-400597_EN.html
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AD-400644_EN.html
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14927&j=0&l=enNew
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14927&j=1&l=en |
docs/13 |
|
docs/13/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2009/1343/COM_SEC(2009)1343_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2009/1343/COM_SEC(2009)1343_EN.pdf |
events/0/date |
Old
2007-10-10T00:00:00New
2007-10-09T00:00:00 |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0574/COM_COM(2007)0574_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0574/COM_COM(2007)0574_EN.pdf |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1279/COM_SEC(2007)1279_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1279/COM_SEC(2007)1279_EN.pdf |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.605New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE400.605 |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE402.775New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE402.775 |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.597&secondRef=03
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.644&secondRef=02
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0163_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0163_EN.html |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14927&j=1&l=en
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2009/1343/COM_SEC(2009)1343_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2009/1343/COM_SEC(2009)1343_EN.pdf |
docs/13 |
|
docs/13 |
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0575/COM_COM(2007)0575_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0575/COM_COM(2007)0575_EN.pdf |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080520&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20080520&type=CRE |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1279/COM_SEC(2007)1279_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1279/COM_SEC(2007)1279_EN.pdf |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1280/COM_SEC(2007)1280_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1280/COM_SEC(2007)1280_EN.pdf |
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-163&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0163_EN.html |
docs/10/body |
EC
|
docs/11/body |
EC
|
docs/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0540/COM_COM(2009)0540_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0540/COM_COM(2009)0540_EN.pdf |
docs/13/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2009/1343/COM_SEC(2009)1343_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2009/1343/COM_SEC(2009)1343_EN.pdf |
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0575/COM_COM(2007)0575_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0575/COM_COM(2007)0575_EN.pdf |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-163&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0163_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-213New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0213_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
TRAN/6/58012New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/subtype |
Old
InitiativeNew
|
procedure/summary |
|
procedure/subject/1 |
Old
3.20.03 Sea transport: passengers and freightNew
3.20.03 Maritime transport: passengers and freight |
procedure/title |
Old
An integrated maritime policy for the EUNew
Integrated maritime policy for the EU |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|