BETA


2008/2010(INI) Strategy for the outermost regions: achievements and future prospects

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead REGI SUDRE Margie (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion PECH
Committee Opinion AGRI
Committee Opinion ITRE
Committee Opinion TRAN
Committee Opinion ENVI
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2008/07/17
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2008/06/12
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2008/05/20
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2008/05/20
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 592 votes to 70, with 22 abstentions, a resolution on the strategy for the outermost regions (ORs), in response to the Commission’s communication on this issue.

The own initiative report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Margie SUDRE (EPP-ED, FR) on behalf of the Committee on Regional Development.

Achievements of the stronger partnership for the ORs : the Parliament notes that the communication offers a particularly favourable assessment of the action taken by the Commission, even though many of the measures it prides itself on only partly address the needs of the ORs (particularly in the fields of transport and accessibility, research, fisheries and regional cooperation), and no reference is made to the problems encountered and efforts made by the ORs, for example, in connection with the renewal of State aid schemes.

MEPs note that Structural Fund intervention continues to play a major role in the development of the ORs. Nevertheless, they would like to see indicators other than merely GDP as compared with the Community average being used to measure the degree of cohesion achieved in these regions. In addition, cohesion policy should be better coordinated with other Community policies across the board, so as to enhance synergies.

The resolution notes the satisfactory results obtained under the specific guidance programmes for remoteness and insularity (POSEI) (agriculture and fisheries) and in the sugar cane, rum and bananas sectors and wishes to see proper consideration given to the financial impact which the ongoing international negotiations may have on these agricultural sectors.

Given the role of ORs in the EU's integrated maritime policy, the Commission is called upon to include in its plan support measures for the fishing industries in these regions.

Fruition stage of the stronger partnership for the ORs : MEPs regret that the proposals put forward by the Commission for the fruition of the partnership mostly concern measures which already exist or are being finalised. They also regret the initial reluctance shown by DG Trade to take into account the specific characteristics of the outermost regions when negotiating Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) and urge the Commission to continue to seek compromises that respect the interests of the ORs concerned, when it comes to reaching final agreements with the ACP countries.

The Parliament reiterates the need for the ORs to be given differential treatment in the area of transport, particularly as regards the inclusion of civil aviation in the European Emission Trading Scheme (ETS). Furthermore, MEPs consider that Community interventions should be a catalyst for a spirit of enterprise that will transform the ORs into centres of excellence, driven by sectors which fully exploit their advantages and know-how, such as waste management, renewable energies, energy self-sufficiency, biodiversity, student mobility, research into climate change and crisis management.

An amendment adopted in plenary calls for the efforts made to date concerning the ORs to be pursued in order both to step up the establishment of local research facilities that are equal to their potential and to encourage and help the development of attractive, successful universities, with genuine resources and with standards equal to those of universities in other parts of the Union's territory.

Debate on the future of the Union's strategy for the ORs : MEPs commend the Commission on its initiative in opening a debate on the future of the strategy to assist the outermost regions, the results of which will serve as the basis for drawing up a new proposal by 2009. They stress, nevertheless, that this debate should not be confined to the challenges mentioned (climate change, demographic change and migration management, agriculture, maritime policy).

The Parliament urges that the scope of Article 299(2) of the EC Treaty (in due course Articles 299 and 311(a) of the Lisbon Treaty), which is the cornerstone of the Union's policy to assist ORs, should be included on the agenda for the debates.

MEPs stress the importance of public services for economic, social and territorial cohesion in the outermost regions, and call for the urgent adoption of measures aimed at combating endemic unemployment, poverty and unequal income distribution. They also believe that the future common immigration policy should devote special attention to the position of ORs, which are all EU external borders. Moreover, the Community support for agriculture in the ORs should be the object of extensive debate with reference to identifying the real challenges, the need to move towards local self-sufficiency and farm income levels.

The Parliament recommends that ways of overcoming the narrowness of local markets, the increasingly open competitive environment, the difficulty of finding market outlets in mainland Europe markets, as well as of improving the coordination of the funding for cooperation projects with neighbouring countries, should also be priorities for debate, together with effective participation by the ORs in European policies to promote innovation and overcome the digital divide.

The Commission, the Council and the other EU institutions concerned are called upon to efficiently, adequately and effectively ensure future Community funding of the Union's strategy to assist ORs and the compensation of handicaps linked to their outermost status.

Documents
2008/05/20
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2008/05/19
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2008/04/17
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2008/04/17
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2008/04/14
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/04/08
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Regional Development adopted the own-initiative report by Margie SUDRE (EPP-ED, FR) in response to the Commission’s communication on the strategy for the outermost regions (ORs).

Achievements of the stronger partnership for the ORs : the report notes that the communication offers a particularly favourable assessment of the action taken by the Commission, even though many of the measures it prides itself on only partly address the needs of the ORs (particularly in the fields of transport and accessibility, research, fisheries and regional cooperation).

MEPs note that Structural Fund intervention continues to play a major role in the development of the ORs. Nevertheless, they would like to see indicators other than merely GDP as compared with the Community average being used to measure the degree of cohesion achieved in these regions. In addition, cohesion policy should be better coordinated with other Community policies across the board, so as to enhance synergies.

Given the role of ORs in the EU's integrated maritime policy, the Commission is called to include in its plan support measures for the fishing industries in these regions.

Fruition stage of the stronger partnership for the ORs: MEPs are concerned at the ever-increasing importance placed by the Commission on tools for assessing Community policies and instruments to assist the ORs, and to estimating the quantitative effects of the handicaps faced by these regions with a view to devising a methodology for offsetting the additional costs linked to their outermost status. They hope that this tendency to take into account increasingly mathematical justifications for the measures taken will not serve as a pretext for calling into question part of the Union's policy to assist the ORs nor deter institutional and economic actors in the outermost regions by imposing conditions on them which are too difficult to meet.

The report reiterates the need for the ORs to be given differential treatment in the area of transport, particularly as regards the inclusion of civil aviation in the European Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) system. Furthermore, MEPs consider that Community interventions should be a catalyst for a spirit of enterprise that will transform the ORs into centres of excellence, driven by sectors which fully exploit their advantages and know-how, such as waste management, renewable energies, energy self-sufficiency, biodiversity, student mobility, research into climate change and crisis management.

Debate on the future of the Union's strategy for the ORs : MEPs commend the Commission on its initiative in opening a debate on the future of the strategy to assist the outermost regions, the results of which will serve as the basis for drawing up a new proposal by 2009. They stress, nevertheless, that this debate should not be confined to the challenges mentioned (climate change, demographic change and migration management, agriculture, maritime policy).

The Committee on Regional Development urges that the scope of Article 299(2) of the EC Treaty (in due course Articles 299 and 311(a) of the Lisbon Treaty), which is the cornerstone of the Union's policy to assist ORs, should be included on the agenda for the debates.

MEPs stress the importance of public services for economic, social and territorial cohesion in the outermost regions, and call for the urgent adoption of measures aimed at combating endemic unemployment, poverty and unequal income distribution. They also believe that the future common immigration policy should devote special attention to the position of ORs, which are all EU external borders. Moreover, the Community support for agriculture in the ORs should be the object of extensive debate with reference to identifying the real challenges, the need to move towards local self-sufficiency and farm income levels.

Lastly, the ways of overcoming the narrowness of local markets, the increasingly open competitive environment, the difficulty of finding market outlets in mainland European markets or in their respective geographic zones, as well as of improving the coordination of funding for cooperation projects with neighbouring countries, together with effective participation by the ORs in European policies to promote innovation and overcome the digital divide, should also be priorities for debate.

2008/04/07
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2008/01/17
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2008/01/11
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2007/11/20
   EP - SUDRE Margie (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in REGI
2007/09/12
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE: to pursue and extend the strategy for the outermost regions (OR).

CONTENT: article 299(2) of the EC Treaty and the two Communications adopted by the Commission in 2004 stress the need to recognise the special nature of the outermost regions (the "ORs") and to put in place a genuine European strategy to support them.

While giving a positive assessment of the first implementation phase of the OR strategy, the Communication stresses the need to intensify the aspects of the 2004 strategy by adopting additional measures for the period 2007-2013. It also considers the long term challenges, focusing on sensitive issues for ORs: climate change, demographic change, and the management of migration, agriculture and EU maritime policy.

The Commission intends to redouble each aspect of the strategy by taking complementary action:

Aspect 1 - Reduce the accessibility deficit and the effects of other constraints specific to the outermost regions: The following measures could help achieve this goal: i) exploiting the opportunities offered by the use of the specific allocation to offset the additional costs of transport and new information and communication technologies; ii) continuing the effort to fill the broadband gap, particularly via ERDF operational programmes; iii) exploiting the opportunities offered by implementing the TEN-T, TEN-E and Marco Polo II programmes; iv) assessing the specific needs of the ORs when the POSEI programme implementation report is drawn up.

Aspect 2 - Make the outermost regions more competitive: Several instruments may strengthen the competitiveness of the ORs: i) the cohesion policy, particularly through the operational programmes for the period 2007–2013 for both the ERDF and the ESF; ii) Community programmes (recognising the special nature of the ORs in the specific programmes of the 7 th FPRTD); exploitation of the Framework Programme on Innovation and Competitiveness as well as of the Lifelong Learning Programme); iii) finally, in relation to the operation of services of general economic interest, the Commission will continue to take account of regional specificities as well as of a detailed analysis of the relevant markets.

Aspect 3 - Strengthen the Wider Neighbourhood Action Plan: Regional integration of the ORs in their vicinities needs to be strengthened by involving public and private local players as well as the Member States concerned. Dialogue between the regions and their neighbouring countries, particularly the ACP (Africa, Caribbean, and Pacific) countries and the overseas countries and territories (OCTs) associated with the EU is the tool for pushing this process forward. There are already some potential measures for pursuing this priority: i) recognising the special nature of the ORs in Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs); ii) coordination of financial instruments; iii) strengthening sea connections between ORs and neighbouring non-member countries; iv) joint participation by ORs and non-member countries in research networks and Community framework programmes; v) recognising the special nature of the ORs in migration policy.

The Communication launches a debate with the European Institutions, the Member States and, within the outermost regions, the regional and local authorities, socio-economic players, the research sector and academic circles. It is suggested that the consultation phase will last until March 2008. During this period the Commission will organise, in partnership with the regions and Member States concerned, seminars and workshops to discuss the following questions:

To what extent can the 2004 strategy be adapted to the new challenges facing the ORs? What would be the most appropriate ways to tackle the major demographic differences and migratory flows between the ORs and neighbouring regions or countries? Is climate change a special challenge to the ORs? What actions can the ORs pursue, under European maritime policy, in order to both benefit from it and to be able to contribute to Europe's sustainable development?

After the closure of the public consultation the Commission will prepare its proposal on the future of the partnership with the outermost regions.

2007/09/11
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: to pursue and extend the strategy for the outermost regions (OR).

CONTENT: article 299(2) of the EC Treaty and the two Communications adopted by the Commission in 2004 stress the need to recognise the special nature of the outermost regions (the "ORs") and to put in place a genuine European strategy to support them.

While giving a positive assessment of the first implementation phase of the OR strategy, the Communication stresses the need to intensify the aspects of the 2004 strategy by adopting additional measures for the period 2007-2013. It also considers the long term challenges, focusing on sensitive issues for ORs: climate change, demographic change, and the management of migration, agriculture and EU maritime policy.

The Commission intends to redouble each aspect of the strategy by taking complementary action:

Aspect 1 - Reduce the accessibility deficit and the effects of other constraints specific to the outermost regions: The following measures could help achieve this goal: i) exploiting the opportunities offered by the use of the specific allocation to offset the additional costs of transport and new information and communication technologies; ii) continuing the effort to fill the broadband gap, particularly via ERDF operational programmes; iii) exploiting the opportunities offered by implementing the TEN-T, TEN-E and Marco Polo II programmes; iv) assessing the specific needs of the ORs when the POSEI programme implementation report is drawn up.

Aspect 2 - Make the outermost regions more competitive: Several instruments may strengthen the competitiveness of the ORs: i) the cohesion policy, particularly through the operational programmes for the period 2007–2013 for both the ERDF and the ESF; ii) Community programmes (recognising the special nature of the ORs in the specific programmes of the 7 th FPRTD); exploitation of the Framework Programme on Innovation and Competitiveness as well as of the Lifelong Learning Programme); iii) finally, in relation to the operation of services of general economic interest, the Commission will continue to take account of regional specificities as well as of a detailed analysis of the relevant markets.

Aspect 3 - Strengthen the Wider Neighbourhood Action Plan: Regional integration of the ORs in their vicinities needs to be strengthened by involving public and private local players as well as the Member States concerned. Dialogue between the regions and their neighbouring countries, particularly the ACP (Africa, Caribbean, and Pacific) countries and the overseas countries and territories (OCTs) associated with the EU is the tool for pushing this process forward. There are already some potential measures for pursuing this priority: i) recognising the special nature of the ORs in Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs); ii) coordination of financial instruments; iii) strengthening sea connections between ORs and neighbouring non-member countries; iv) joint participation by ORs and non-member countries in research networks and Community framework programmes; v) recognising the special nature of the ORs in migration policy.

The Communication launches a debate with the European Institutions, the Member States and, within the outermost regions, the regional and local authorities, socio-economic players, the research sector and academic circles. It is suggested that the consultation phase will last until March 2008. During this period the Commission will organise, in partnership with the regions and Member States concerned, seminars and workshops to discuss the following questions:

To what extent can the 2004 strategy be adapted to the new challenges facing the ORs? What would be the most appropriate ways to tackle the major demographic differences and migratory flows between the ORs and neighbouring regions or countries? Is climate change a special challenge to the ORs? What actions can the ORs pursue, under European maritime policy, in order to both benefit from it and to be able to contribute to Europe's sustainable development?

After the closure of the public consultation the Commission will prepare its proposal on the future of the partnership with the outermost regions.

Documents

Activities

Votes

Rapport Sudre A6-0158/2008 - par. 13 #

2008/05/20 Outcome: +: 596, -: 62, 0: 17
DE FR PL IT ES GB RO HU PT CZ EL BG LT NL BE AT IE DK FI SK SI LV CY EE MT LU SE
Total
91
70
50
52
48
66
24
22
21
23
20
17
12
25
20
16
10
14
13
9
7
8
6
5
4
5
17
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
247
2

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3
icon: PSE PSE
189

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Malta PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
86

Spain ALDE

1
2

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: UEN UEN
34

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
36
2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: NI NI
25

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

3

Belgium NI

3

Austria NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
20

France IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Rapport Sudre A6-0158/2008 - am. 9 #

2008/05/20 Outcome: -: 598, +: 70, 0: 16
CY EE MT LU SI CZ IE LV PT DK LT SK FI BG AT SE EL BE NL HU RO IT PL ES FR GB DE
Total
6
4
4
5
7
23
10
8
21
13
12
10
13
17
16
18
20
20
24
23
25
55
50
48
71
68
93
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
36

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2
2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
28

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Against (2)

2

Austria NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

3

Italy NI

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

6
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
20

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

6
icon: UEN UEN
35

Latvia UEN

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
84

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Hungary ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

1
icon: PSE PSE
194

Estonia PSE

2

Malta PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Finland PSE

3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
248

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Rapport Sudre A6-0158/2008 - am. 11 #

2008/05/20 Outcome: -: 591, +: 71, 0: 13
IE CY LV EE MT LU LT SI PT CZ DK SK FI EL AT BG SE BE IT NL HU RO FR ES PL GB DE
Total
10
6
8
4
4
5
12
7
20
23
13
10
12
20
16
17
18
20
53
25
23
25
69
46
49
67
93
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2
2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: UEN UEN
34

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
21

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

3
icon: NI NI
28

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Against (2)

2

Austria NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Bulgaria NI

3

Belgium NI

3

Italy NI

For (1)

3
2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

6
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
83

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Hungary ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

1
icon: PSE PSE
191

Estonia PSE

2

Malta PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Finland PSE

3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
244

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
3

Rapport Sudre A6-0158/2008 - am. 13 #

2008/05/20 Outcome: -: 564, +: 77, 0: 42
IE LV CY SI EE MT LU LT CZ AT PT SK DK FI EL BG SE BE NL IT HU RO FR PL ES GB DE
Total
10
8
6
7
5
4
5
12
23
16
21
10
13
13
20
17
18
20
25
55
23
25
71
47
48
68
93
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
36

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2
2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

For (1)

3

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Romania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: UEN UEN
34

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
20

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

2
icon: NI NI
28

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Against (2)

2

Bulgaria NI

3

Belgium NI

3

Italy NI

For (1)

3
2

United Kingdom NI

6
icon: ALDE ALDE
85

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Hungary ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

1
icon: PSE PSE
193

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Malta PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Czechia PSE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Finland PSE

3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
248

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Rapport Sudre A6-0158/2008 - am. 15 #

2008/05/20 Outcome: -: 604, +: 56, 0: 18
MT CY EE SI LU IE LV SK PT CZ DK FI EL LT AT BG SE BE RO NL HU IT FR PL ES GB DE
Total
3
6
5
7
5
10
8
10
21
23
14
12
20
12
16
17
17
20
25
25
23
54
69
49
48
68
91
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
36

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2
2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
21

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

3
icon: NI NI
28

Slovakia NI

Against (2)

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Bulgaria NI

3

Belgium NI

3
3
2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

6
icon: UEN UEN
35

Latvia UEN

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (1)

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
86

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Hungary ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

1
icon: PSE PSE
190

Malta PSE

1

Estonia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Czechia PSE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland PSE

3

Lithuania PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
244

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
3

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Rapport Sudre A6-0158/2008 - résolution #

2008/05/20 Outcome: +: 592, -: 70, 0: 22
DE FR IT PL ES GB RO HU PT EL BG LT BE NL IE FI AT SK SE LV CY DK SI CZ EE MT LU
Total
93
71
54
50
48
68
25
22
21
20
17
12
20
25
10
13
16
10
18
8
6
13
7
23
5
4
5
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
247
2

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

Against (1)

4

Estonia PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3
icon: PSE PSE
192

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Estonia PSE

2

Malta PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
86

Spain ALDE

1
2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: UEN UEN
35

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
36
2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
28

Italy NI

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (2)

6

Bulgaria NI

3

Belgium NI

Against (1)

3

Austria NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovakia NI

2

Czechia NI

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
21

Poland IND/DEM

3

Greece IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Romania Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
77 2008/2010(INI)
2008/03/07 REGI 48 amendments...
source: PE-402.891
2008/03/12 PECH 29 amendments...
source: PE-404.407

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
committees/2
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
opinion
False
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
committees/5
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
committees/5/rapporteur
  • name: GUERREIRO Pedro date: 2007-12-20T00:00:00 group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
docs/0
date
2007-09-12T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
docs/2
date
2008-04-14T00:00:00
docs
url: http://nullEN&reference=PE400.669&secondRef=03 title: PE400.669
committee
PECH
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/3
date
2008-04-14T00:00:00
docs
url: http://nullEN&reference=PE400.669&secondRef=03 title: PE400.669
committee
PECH
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE400.669&secondRef=03
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AD-400669_EN.html
docs/5
date
2008-07-17T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=14918&j=0&l=en title: SP(2008)4116
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/6
date
2008-07-17T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=14918&j=0&l=en title: SP(2008)4116
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14918&j=0&l=en
New
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14918&j=1&l=en
events/0/date
Old
2007-09-12T00:00:00
New
2007-09-11T00:00:00
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.398
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE400.398
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE402.891
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE402.891
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.669&secondRef=03
New
http://nullEN&reference=PE400.669&secondRef=03
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0158_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0158_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14918&j=1&l=en
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2008-04-17T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0158_EN.html title: A6-0158/2008
events/3
date
2008-04-17T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0158_EN.html title: A6-0158/2008
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080519&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20080519&type=CRE
events/6
date
2008-05-20T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0210_EN.html title: T6-0210/2008
summary
events/6
date
2008-05-20T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0210_EN.html title: T6-0210/2008
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
rapporteur
name: SUDRE Margie date: 2007-11-20T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2007-11-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SUDRE Margie group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
rapporteur
name: GUERREIRO Pedro date: 2007-12-20T00:00:00 group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
date
2007-12-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GUERREIRO Pedro group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-158&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0158_EN.html
docs/4/body
EC
docs/5/body
EC
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0507/COM_COM(2007)0507_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0507/COM_COM(2007)0507_EN.pdf
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-158&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0158_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-210
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0210_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2007-09-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0507/COM_COM(2007)0507_EN.pdf title: COM(2007)0507 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52007DC0507:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional and Urban Policy Commissioner: HÜBNER Danuta type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2008-01-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: PECH date: 2007-12-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Fisheries rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: GUERREIRO Pedro body: EP responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2007-11-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SUDRE Margie body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2008-04-08T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: PECH date: 2007-12-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Fisheries rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: GUERREIRO Pedro body: EP responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2007-11-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SUDRE Margie body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-04-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-158&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0158/2008 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2008-05-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080519&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-05-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14918&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-210 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0210/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: HÜBNER Danuta
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2007-11-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SUDRE Margie group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
PECH
date
2007-12-20T00:00:00
committee_full
Fisheries
rapporteur
group: GUE/NGL name: GUERREIRO Pedro
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
REGI
date
2007-11-20T00:00:00
committee_full
Regional Development
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: SUDRE Margie
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
date
2007-12-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GUERREIRO Pedro group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
docs
  • date: 2008-01-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.398 title: PE400.398 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2008-04-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE402.891 title: PE402.891 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2008-04-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.669&secondRef=03 title: PE400.669 committee: PECH type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2008-04-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-158&language=EN title: A6-0158/2008 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2008-06-12T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=14918&j=1&l=en title: SP(2008)3593/2 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2008-07-17T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=14918&j=0&l=en title: SP(2008)4116 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2007-09-12T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0507/COM_COM(2007)0507_EN.pdf title: COM(2007)0507 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2007&nu_doc=507 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to pursue and extend the strategy for the outermost regions (OR). CONTENT: article 299(2) of the EC Treaty and the two Communications adopted by the Commission in 2004 stress the need to recognise the special nature of the outermost regions (the "ORs") and to put in place a genuine European strategy to support them. While giving a positive assessment of the first implementation phase of the OR strategy, the Communication stresses the need to intensify the aspects of the 2004 strategy by adopting additional measures for the period 2007-2013. It also considers the long term challenges, focusing on sensitive issues for ORs: climate change, demographic change, and the management of migration, agriculture and EU maritime policy. The Commission intends to redouble each aspect of the strategy by taking complementary action: Aspect 1 - Reduce the accessibility deficit and the effects of other constraints specific to the outermost regions: The following measures could help achieve this goal: i) exploiting the opportunities offered by the use of the specific allocation to offset the additional costs of transport and new information and communication technologies; ii) continuing the effort to fill the broadband gap, particularly via ERDF operational programmes; iii) exploiting the opportunities offered by implementing the TEN-T, TEN-E and Marco Polo II programmes; iv) assessing the specific needs of the ORs when the POSEI programme implementation report is drawn up. Aspect 2 - Make the outermost regions more competitive: Several instruments may strengthen the competitiveness of the ORs: i) the cohesion policy, particularly through the operational programmes for the period 2007–2013 for both the ERDF and the ESF; ii) Community programmes (recognising the special nature of the ORs in the specific programmes of the 7 th FPRTD); exploitation of the Framework Programme on Innovation and Competitiveness as well as of the Lifelong Learning Programme); iii) finally, in relation to the operation of services of general economic interest, the Commission will continue to take account of regional specificities as well as of a detailed analysis of the relevant markets. Aspect 3 - Strengthen the Wider Neighbourhood Action Plan: Regional integration of the ORs in their vicinities needs to be strengthened by involving public and private local players as well as the Member States concerned. Dialogue between the regions and their neighbouring countries, particularly the ACP (Africa, Caribbean, and Pacific) countries and the overseas countries and territories (OCTs) associated with the EU is the tool for pushing this process forward. There are already some potential measures for pursuing this priority: i) recognising the special nature of the ORs in Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs); ii) coordination of financial instruments; iii) strengthening sea connections between ORs and neighbouring non-member countries; iv) joint participation by ORs and non-member countries in research networks and Community framework programmes; v) recognising the special nature of the ORs in migration policy. The Communication launches a debate with the European Institutions, the Member States and, within the outermost regions, the regional and local authorities, socio-economic players, the research sector and academic circles. It is suggested that the consultation phase will last until March 2008. During this period the Commission will organise, in partnership with the regions and Member States concerned, seminars and workshops to discuss the following questions: To what extent can the 2004 strategy be adapted to the new challenges facing the ORs? What would be the most appropriate ways to tackle the major demographic differences and migratory flows between the ORs and neighbouring regions or countries? Is climate change a special challenge to the ORs? What actions can the ORs pursue, under European maritime policy, in order to both benefit from it and to be able to contribute to Europe's sustainable development? After the closure of the public consultation the Commission will prepare its proposal on the future of the partnership with the outermost regions.
  • date: 2008-01-17T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2008-04-08T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Regional Development adopted the own-initiative report by Margie SUDRE (EPP-ED, FR) in response to the Commission’s communication on the strategy for the outermost regions (ORs). Achievements of the stronger partnership for the ORs : the report notes that the communication offers a particularly favourable assessment of the action taken by the Commission, even though many of the measures it prides itself on only partly address the needs of the ORs (particularly in the fields of transport and accessibility, research, fisheries and regional cooperation). MEPs note that Structural Fund intervention continues to play a major role in the development of the ORs. Nevertheless, they would like to see indicators other than merely GDP as compared with the Community average being used to measure the degree of cohesion achieved in these regions. In addition, cohesion policy should be better coordinated with other Community policies across the board, so as to enhance synergies. Given the role of ORs in the EU's integrated maritime policy, the Commission is called to include in its plan support measures for the fishing industries in these regions. Fruition stage of the stronger partnership for the ORs: MEPs are concerned at the ever-increasing importance placed by the Commission on tools for assessing Community policies and instruments to assist the ORs, and to estimating the quantitative effects of the handicaps faced by these regions with a view to devising a methodology for offsetting the additional costs linked to their outermost status. They hope that this tendency to take into account increasingly mathematical justifications for the measures taken will not serve as a pretext for calling into question part of the Union's policy to assist the ORs nor deter institutional and economic actors in the outermost regions by imposing conditions on them which are too difficult to meet. The report reiterates the need for the ORs to be given differential treatment in the area of transport, particularly as regards the inclusion of civil aviation in the European Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) system. Furthermore, MEPs consider that Community interventions should be a catalyst for a spirit of enterprise that will transform the ORs into centres of excellence, driven by sectors which fully exploit their advantages and know-how, such as waste management, renewable energies, energy self-sufficiency, biodiversity, student mobility, research into climate change and crisis management. Debate on the future of the Union's strategy for the ORs : MEPs commend the Commission on its initiative in opening a debate on the future of the strategy to assist the outermost regions, the results of which will serve as the basis for drawing up a new proposal by 2009. They stress, nevertheless, that this debate should not be confined to the challenges mentioned (climate change, demographic change and migration management, agriculture, maritime policy). The Committee on Regional Development urges that the scope of Article 299(2) of the EC Treaty (in due course Articles 299 and 311(a) of the Lisbon Treaty), which is the cornerstone of the Union's policy to assist ORs, should be included on the agenda for the debates. MEPs stress the importance of public services for economic, social and territorial cohesion in the outermost regions, and call for the urgent adoption of measures aimed at combating endemic unemployment, poverty and unequal income distribution. They also believe that the future common immigration policy should devote special attention to the position of ORs, which are all EU external borders. Moreover, the Community support for agriculture in the ORs should be the object of extensive debate with reference to identifying the real challenges, the need to move towards local self-sufficiency and farm income levels. Lastly, the ways of overcoming the narrowness of local markets, the increasingly open competitive environment, the difficulty of finding market outlets in mainland European markets or in their respective geographic zones, as well as of improving the coordination of funding for cooperation projects with neighbouring countries, together with effective participation by the ORs in European policies to promote innovation and overcome the digital divide, should also be priorities for debate.
  • date: 2008-04-17T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-158&language=EN title: A6-0158/2008
  • date: 2008-05-19T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080519&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-05-20T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14918&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2008-05-20T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-210 title: T6-0210/2008 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 592 votes to 70, with 22 abstentions, a resolution on the strategy for the outermost regions (ORs), in response to the Commission’s communication on this issue. The own initiative report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Margie SUDRE (EPP-ED, FR) on behalf of the Committee on Regional Development. Achievements of the stronger partnership for the ORs : the Parliament notes that the communication offers a particularly favourable assessment of the action taken by the Commission, even though many of the measures it prides itself on only partly address the needs of the ORs (particularly in the fields of transport and accessibility, research, fisheries and regional cooperation), and no reference is made to the problems encountered and efforts made by the ORs, for example, in connection with the renewal of State aid schemes. MEPs note that Structural Fund intervention continues to play a major role in the development of the ORs. Nevertheless, they would like to see indicators other than merely GDP as compared with the Community average being used to measure the degree of cohesion achieved in these regions. In addition, cohesion policy should be better coordinated with other Community policies across the board, so as to enhance synergies. The resolution notes the satisfactory results obtained under the specific guidance programmes for remoteness and insularity (POSEI) (agriculture and fisheries) and in the sugar cane, rum and bananas sectors and wishes to see proper consideration given to the financial impact which the ongoing international negotiations may have on these agricultural sectors. Given the role of ORs in the EU's integrated maritime policy, the Commission is called upon to include in its plan support measures for the fishing industries in these regions. Fruition stage of the stronger partnership for the ORs : MEPs regret that the proposals put forward by the Commission for the fruition of the partnership mostly concern measures which already exist or are being finalised. They also regret the initial reluctance shown by DG Trade to take into account the specific characteristics of the outermost regions when negotiating Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) and urge the Commission to continue to seek compromises that respect the interests of the ORs concerned, when it comes to reaching final agreements with the ACP countries. The Parliament reiterates the need for the ORs to be given differential treatment in the area of transport, particularly as regards the inclusion of civil aviation in the European Emission Trading Scheme (ETS). Furthermore, MEPs consider that Community interventions should be a catalyst for a spirit of enterprise that will transform the ORs into centres of excellence, driven by sectors which fully exploit their advantages and know-how, such as waste management, renewable energies, energy self-sufficiency, biodiversity, student mobility, research into climate change and crisis management. An amendment adopted in plenary calls for the efforts made to date concerning the ORs to be pursued in order both to step up the establishment of local research facilities that are equal to their potential and to encourage and help the development of attractive, successful universities, with genuine resources and with standards equal to those of universities in other parts of the Union's territory. Debate on the future of the Union's strategy for the ORs : MEPs commend the Commission on its initiative in opening a debate on the future of the strategy to assist the outermost regions, the results of which will serve as the basis for drawing up a new proposal by 2009. They stress, nevertheless, that this debate should not be confined to the challenges mentioned (climate change, demographic change and migration management, agriculture, maritime policy). The Parliament urges that the scope of Article 299(2) of the EC Treaty (in due course Articles 299 and 311(a) of the Lisbon Treaty), which is the cornerstone of the Union's policy to assist ORs, should be included on the agenda for the debates. MEPs stress the importance of public services for economic, social and territorial cohesion in the outermost regions, and call for the urgent adoption of measures aimed at combating endemic unemployment, poverty and unequal income distribution. They also believe that the future common immigration policy should devote special attention to the position of ORs, which are all EU external borders. Moreover, the Community support for agriculture in the ORs should be the object of extensive debate with reference to identifying the real challenges, the need to move towards local self-sufficiency and farm income levels. The Parliament recommends that ways of overcoming the narrowness of local markets, the increasingly open competitive environment, the difficulty of finding market outlets in mainland Europe markets, as well as of improving the coordination of the funding for cooperation projects with neighbouring countries, should also be priorities for debate, together with effective participation by the ORs in European policies to promote innovation and overcome the digital divide. The Commission, the Council and the other EU institutions concerned are called upon to efficiently, adequately and effectively ensure future Community funding of the Union's strategy to assist ORs and the compensation of handicaps linked to their outermost status.
  • date: 2008-05-20T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: HÜBNER Danuta
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
REGI/6/58018
New
  • REGI/6/58018
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.70.06 Outlying and outermost regions, overseas countries and territories
New
4.70.06
Outlying and outermost regions, overseas countries and territories
activities/0/commission/0/DG/title
Old
Regional Policy
New
Regional and Urban Policy
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0507/COM_COM(2007)0507_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0507/COM_COM(2007)0507_EN.pdf
other/0/dg/title
Old
Regional Policy
New
Regional and Urban Policy
activities
  • date: 2007-09-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0507/COM_COM(2007)0507_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52007DC0507:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2007)0507 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional Policy Commissioner: HÜBNER Danuta
  • date: 2008-01-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: PECH date: 2007-12-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Fisheries rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: GUERREIRO Pedro body: EP responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2007-11-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SUDRE Margie body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2008-04-08T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: PECH date: 2007-12-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Fisheries rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: GUERREIRO Pedro body: EP responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2007-11-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SUDRE Margie body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-04-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-158&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0158/2008 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2008-05-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080519&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-05-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14918&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-210 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0210/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: PECH date: 2007-12-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Fisheries rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: GUERREIRO Pedro
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2007-11-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SUDRE Margie
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional Policy commissioner: HÜBNER Danuta
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
REGI/6/58018
reference
2008/2010(INI)
title
Strategy for the outermost regions: achievements and future prospects
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
4.70.06 Outlying and outermost regions, overseas countries and territories