BETA


2008/2011(INI) Community media in Europe

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CULT RESETARITS Karin (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion LIBE
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4

Events

2008/10/17
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2008/09/25
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2008/09/25
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 471 votes to 42, with 8 abstentions a resolution on community media in Europe.

The own initiative report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Karin RESETARITS (ALDE, AT) on behalf of the Committee on Culture and Education.

Parliament stressed that these media are an effective means to strengthen cultural and linguistic diversity, social inclusion and local identity. Community media fulfil a broad, yet largely unacknowledged role in the media landscape, particularly as a source of local content. However, this sector still lacks legal recognition and is now faced with several challenges, particularly the transition to digital and the new age of the Internet. That is why the report highlights the need to strengthen community media and reinforce their presence.

In fact, according to the Parliament, community media help to strengthen the identities of specific communities of interest, while at the same time enabling members of those communities to engage with other groups in society, and therefore play an important role in fostering tolerance and pluralism in society. MEPs also stress that community media promote intercultural dialogue by educating the general public, combating negative stereotypes regarding social categories threatened with exclusion, such as refugees, migrants, Roma and other ethnic and religious minorities. They are therefore one of the existing means of facilitating the integration of immigrants and other disadvantaged members of society.

Community media can also act as a catalyst for local creativity, providing artists and creative entrepreneurs with a public platform for testing new ideas and concepts. They can also contribute to the goal of improving citizens’ media literacy through their direct involvement in the creation and distribution of content. MEPs therefore encourage school-based community outlets to develop a civic attitude in the young and to increase their media literacy.

In this report, MEPs consider that community media should be defined as: non-profit making and independent, not only from national, but also from local power, engaging primarily in activities of public and civil society interest, serving clearly defined objectives which always include a social gain and contribute to intercultural dialogue; accountable to the community which they seek to serve, which means that they are to inform the community about their actions and decisions, to justify them, and to be penalised in the event of any misconduct, so that the service remains controlled by the interests of the community; open to participation in the creation of content by members of the community, who may participate in all aspects of the operation and management.

Pluralism and community media : Parliament stresses that community media help to strengthen media pluralism, as they provide additional perspectives on issues that lie at the heart of a given community. In certain areas where public and commercial media no longer include local content, community media may provide the only source of local news and information and the sole voice of local communities. They can therefore also make citizens more aware of existing public services and can help to foster civil participation in public discourse. They may also serve as an effective means of bringing the Union closer to its citizens, provided they remain politically independent.

A sector in search of resources : MEPs note that the financial resources of community media vary greatly but are in general rather scarce. Noting that this sector lacks the support needed for it to be able to make major efforts to improve its representation to and contact with the European Union, MEPs consider that it should be given additional funding. They consider, in particular, that the sector could make more use of EU funding schemes (including the European Regional Development Fund and the European Social Fund). However, funding must come principally from national, local and/or other sources. MEPs also consider that digital adaptation would enable the community media sector to extend its innovative profile and to provide services bringing added value to the existing analogue offerings.

A sector in search of recognition : Parliament advises Member States to give legal recognition to community media as a distinct group alongside commercial and public media where such recognition is still lacking. The Commission is called upon to take into account community media as an alternative, bottom-up solution for increasing media pluralism when designing indicators for media pluralism. Member States are also called upon to offer more active support to community media to ensure media pluralism. At the same time, MEPs call on the Member States to make television and radio frequency spectrum available to community media, both analogue and digital, to take into account their social value. They also urge community media to establish a European Internet platform through which useful and relevant information for the sector can be diffused, and to facilitate networking and exchange of best practices.

Documents
2008/09/25
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2008/06/24
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2008/06/24
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2008/06/02
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Culture and Education adopted the own initiative report by Karin RESETARITS (ALDE, AT) on the role of Community Media in Europe, stressing that these media are an effective means to strengthen cultural and linguistic diversity, social inclusion and local identity. Community media fulfil a broad, yet largely unacknowledged role in the media landscape, particularly as a source of local content. However, this sector still lacks legal recognition and is now faced with several challenges, particularly the transition to digital and the new age of the Internet. That is why the report highlights the need to strengthen community media and reinforce their presence.

In fact, according to MEPs, community media help to strengthen the identities of specific communities of interest, while at the same time enabling members of those communities to engage with other groups in society, and therefore play an important role in fostering tolerance and pluralism in society. MEPs also stress that community media promote intercultural dialogue by educating the general public, combating negative stereotypes regarding social categories threatened with exclusion, such as refugees, migrants, Roma and other ethnic and religious minorities. They are therefore one of the existing means of facilitating the integration of immigrants and other disadvantaged members of society.

Community media can also act as a catalyst for local creativity, providing artists and creative entrepreneurs with a public platform for testing new ideas and concepts. They can also contribute to the goal of improving citizens’ media literacy through their direct involvement in the creation and distribution of content. MEPs therefore encourage school-based community outlets to develop a civic attitude in the young and to increase their media literacy.

In this report, MEPs consider that community media should be defined as:

non-profit making and independent, not only from national, but also from local power, engaging primarily in activities of public and civil society interest, serving clearly defined objectives which always include a social gain and contribute to intercultural dialogue; accountable to the community which they seek to serve, which means that they are to inform the community about their actions and decisions, to justify them, and to be penalised in the event of any misconduct, so that the service remains controlled by the interests of the community; open to participation in the creation of content by members of the community, who may participate in all aspects of the operation and management.

Pluralism and community media : MEPs stress that community media help to strengthen media pluralism, as they provide additional perspectives on issues that lie at the heart of a given community. In certain areas where public and commercial media no longer include local content, community media may provide the only source of local news and information and the sole voice of local communities. They can therefore also make citizens more aware of existing public services and can help to foster civil participation in public discourse. They may also serve as an effective means of bringing the Union closer to its citizens, provided they remain politically independent .

A sector in search of resources : MEPs note that the financial resources of community media vary greatly but are in general rather scarce. Noting that this sector lacks the support needed for it to be able to make major efforts to improve its representation to and contact with the European Union, MEPs consider that it should be given additional funding. They consider, in particular, that the sector could make more use of EU funding schemes (including the European Regional Development Fund and the European Social Fund). However, funding must come principally from national, local and/or other sources. MEPs also consider that digital adaptation would enable the community media sector to extend its innovative profile and to provide services bringing added value to the existing analogue offerings.

A sector in search of recognition : MEPs advise Member States to give legal recognition to community media as a distinct group alongside commercial and public media where such recognition is still lacking. The Commission is called upon to take into account community media as an alternative, bottom-up solution for increasing media pluralism when designing indicators for media pluralism. Member States are also called upon to offer more active support to community media to ensure media pluralism. At the same time, MEPs call on the Member States to make television and radio frequency spectrum available to community media, both analogue and digital, to take into account their social value. They also urge community media to establish a European Internet platform through which useful and relevant information for the sector can be diffused, and to facilitate networking and exchange of best practices.

2008/04/15
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2008/03/07
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2008/01/17
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2006/09/11
   EP - RESETARITS Karin (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in CULT

Documents

Votes

Rapport Resetarits A6-0263/2008 - résolution #

2008/09/25 Outcome: +: 471, -: 42, 0: 8
DE FR IT PL ES RO HU EL BE PT GB NL AT BG FI SK CZ LT DK SI IE EE CY SE MT LU LV
Total
69
48
40
44
31
23
19
17
16
14
54
18
12
11
10
10
17
7
10
6
8
6
5
13
4
5
4
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
213
2

Ireland PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Sweden PPE-DE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

5

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
147

Finland PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Romania ALDE

2

Hungary ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
26

Lithuania UEN

1
3

Latvia UEN

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
23

France Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
24

France GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
12

Poland IND/DEM

3

United Kingdom IND/DEM

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2
icon: NI NI
14

Italy NI

Against (1)

1
2

Austria NI

1

Czechia NI

1
AmendmentsDossier
67 2008/2011(INI)
2008/04/15 CULT 67 amendments...
source: PE-404.766

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/3/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15287&j=0&l=en
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 54-p4
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE402.919
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE402.919
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.766
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE404.766
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0263_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0263_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15287&j=0&l=en
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2008-06-24T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0263_EN.html title: A6-0263/2008
events/2
date
2008-06-24T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0263_EN.html title: A6-0263/2008
events/4
date
2008-09-25T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0456_EN.html title: T6-0456/2008
summary
events/4
date
2008-09-25T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0456_EN.html title: T6-0456/2008
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
rapporteur
name: RESETARITS Karin date: 2006-09-11T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2006-09-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: RESETARITS Karin group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-263&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0263_EN.html
docs/3/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-263&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0263_EN.html
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-456
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0456_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2008-01-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2006-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: ALDE name: RESETARITS Karin body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • date: 2008-06-02T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2006-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: ALDE name: RESETARITS Karin body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-06-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-263&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0263/2008 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2008-09-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=15287&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-456 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0456/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Communications Networks, Content and Technology commissioner: REDING Viviane
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2006-09-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: RESETARITS Karin group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
CULT
date
2006-09-11T00:00:00
committee_full
Culture and Education
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: RESETARITS Karin
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
docs
  • date: 2008-03-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE402.919 title: PE402.919 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2008-04-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.766 title: PE404.766 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2008-06-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-263&language=EN title: A6-0263/2008 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2008-10-17T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=15287&j=0&l=en title: SP(2008)6073 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2008-01-17T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2008-06-02T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Culture and Education adopted the own initiative report by Karin RESETARITS (ALDE, AT) on the role of Community Media in Europe, stressing that these media are an effective means to strengthen cultural and linguistic diversity, social inclusion and local identity. Community media fulfil a broad, yet largely unacknowledged role in the media landscape, particularly as a source of local content. However, this sector still lacks legal recognition and is now faced with several challenges, particularly the transition to digital and the new age of the Internet. That is why the report highlights the need to strengthen community media and reinforce their presence. In fact, according to MEPs, community media help to strengthen the identities of specific communities of interest, while at the same time enabling members of those communities to engage with other groups in society, and therefore play an important role in fostering tolerance and pluralism in society. MEPs also stress that community media promote intercultural dialogue by educating the general public, combating negative stereotypes regarding social categories threatened with exclusion, such as refugees, migrants, Roma and other ethnic and religious minorities. They are therefore one of the existing means of facilitating the integration of immigrants and other disadvantaged members of society. Community media can also act as a catalyst for local creativity, providing artists and creative entrepreneurs with a public platform for testing new ideas and concepts. They can also contribute to the goal of improving citizens’ media literacy through their direct involvement in the creation and distribution of content. MEPs therefore encourage school-based community outlets to develop a civic attitude in the young and to increase their media literacy. In this report, MEPs consider that community media should be defined as: non-profit making and independent, not only from national, but also from local power, engaging primarily in activities of public and civil society interest, serving clearly defined objectives which always include a social gain and contribute to intercultural dialogue; accountable to the community which they seek to serve, which means that they are to inform the community about their actions and decisions, to justify them, and to be penalised in the event of any misconduct, so that the service remains controlled by the interests of the community; open to participation in the creation of content by members of the community, who may participate in all aspects of the operation and management. Pluralism and community media : MEPs stress that community media help to strengthen media pluralism, as they provide additional perspectives on issues that lie at the heart of a given community. In certain areas where public and commercial media no longer include local content, community media may provide the only source of local news and information and the sole voice of local communities. They can therefore also make citizens more aware of existing public services and can help to foster civil participation in public discourse. They may also serve as an effective means of bringing the Union closer to its citizens, provided they remain politically independent . A sector in search of resources : MEPs note that the financial resources of community media vary greatly but are in general rather scarce. Noting that this sector lacks the support needed for it to be able to make major efforts to improve its representation to and contact with the European Union, MEPs consider that it should be given additional funding. They consider, in particular, that the sector could make more use of EU funding schemes (including the European Regional Development Fund and the European Social Fund). However, funding must come principally from national, local and/or other sources. MEPs also consider that digital adaptation would enable the community media sector to extend its innovative profile and to provide services bringing added value to the existing analogue offerings. A sector in search of recognition : MEPs advise Member States to give legal recognition to community media as a distinct group alongside commercial and public media where such recognition is still lacking. The Commission is called upon to take into account community media as an alternative, bottom-up solution for increasing media pluralism when designing indicators for media pluralism. Member States are also called upon to offer more active support to community media to ensure media pluralism. At the same time, MEPs call on the Member States to make television and radio frequency spectrum available to community media, both analogue and digital, to take into account their social value. They also urge community media to establish a European Internet platform through which useful and relevant information for the sector can be diffused, and to facilitate networking and exchange of best practices.
  • date: 2008-06-24T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-263&language=EN title: A6-0263/2008
  • date: 2008-09-25T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=15287&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2008-09-25T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-456 title: T6-0456/2008 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 471 votes to 42, with 8 abstentions a resolution on community media in Europe. The own initiative report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Karin RESETARITS (ALDE, AT) on behalf of the Committee on Culture and Education. Parliament stressed that these media are an effective means to strengthen cultural and linguistic diversity, social inclusion and local identity. Community media fulfil a broad, yet largely unacknowledged role in the media landscape, particularly as a source of local content. However, this sector still lacks legal recognition and is now faced with several challenges, particularly the transition to digital and the new age of the Internet. That is why the report highlights the need to strengthen community media and reinforce their presence. In fact, according to the Parliament, community media help to strengthen the identities of specific communities of interest, while at the same time enabling members of those communities to engage with other groups in society, and therefore play an important role in fostering tolerance and pluralism in society. MEPs also stress that community media promote intercultural dialogue by educating the general public, combating negative stereotypes regarding social categories threatened with exclusion, such as refugees, migrants, Roma and other ethnic and religious minorities. They are therefore one of the existing means of facilitating the integration of immigrants and other disadvantaged members of society. Community media can also act as a catalyst for local creativity, providing artists and creative entrepreneurs with a public platform for testing new ideas and concepts. They can also contribute to the goal of improving citizens’ media literacy through their direct involvement in the creation and distribution of content. MEPs therefore encourage school-based community outlets to develop a civic attitude in the young and to increase their media literacy. In this report, MEPs consider that community media should be defined as: non-profit making and independent, not only from national, but also from local power, engaging primarily in activities of public and civil society interest, serving clearly defined objectives which always include a social gain and contribute to intercultural dialogue; accountable to the community which they seek to serve, which means that they are to inform the community about their actions and decisions, to justify them, and to be penalised in the event of any misconduct, so that the service remains controlled by the interests of the community; open to participation in the creation of content by members of the community, who may participate in all aspects of the operation and management. Pluralism and community media : Parliament stresses that community media help to strengthen media pluralism, as they provide additional perspectives on issues that lie at the heart of a given community. In certain areas where public and commercial media no longer include local content, community media may provide the only source of local news and information and the sole voice of local communities. They can therefore also make citizens more aware of existing public services and can help to foster civil participation in public discourse. They may also serve as an effective means of bringing the Union closer to its citizens, provided they remain politically independent. A sector in search of resources : MEPs note that the financial resources of community media vary greatly but are in general rather scarce. Noting that this sector lacks the support needed for it to be able to make major efforts to improve its representation to and contact with the European Union, MEPs consider that it should be given additional funding. They consider, in particular, that the sector could make more use of EU funding schemes (including the European Regional Development Fund and the European Social Fund). However, funding must come principally from national, local and/or other sources. MEPs also consider that digital adaptation would enable the community media sector to extend its innovative profile and to provide services bringing added value to the existing analogue offerings. A sector in search of recognition : Parliament advises Member States to give legal recognition to community media as a distinct group alongside commercial and public media where such recognition is still lacking. The Commission is called upon to take into account community media as an alternative, bottom-up solution for increasing media pluralism when designing indicators for media pluralism. Member States are also called upon to offer more active support to community media to ensure media pluralism. At the same time, MEPs call on the Member States to make television and radio frequency spectrum available to community media, both analogue and digital, to take into account their social value. They also urge community media to establish a European Internet platform through which useful and relevant information for the sector can be diffused, and to facilitate networking and exchange of best practices.
  • date: 2008-09-25T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/connect/index_en.htm title: Communications Networks, Content and Technology commissioner: REDING Viviane
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CULT/6/41839
New
  • CULT/6/41839
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052-p2
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.30 Information and communications in general
  • 3.30.08 Press, media freedom and pluralism
  • 4.45 Common cultural area, cultural diversity
  • 4.45.06 Heritage and culture protection, movement of works of art
New
3.30
Information and communications in general
3.30.08
Press, media freedom and pluralism
4.45
Common cultural area, cultural diversity
4.45.06
Heritage and culture protection, movement of works of art
procedure/subject/1
Old
3.30.08 Press, media pluralism
New
3.30.08 Press, media freedom and pluralism
activities
  • date: 2008-01-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2006-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: ALDE name: RESETARITS Karin body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • date: 2008-06-02T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2006-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: ALDE name: RESETARITS Karin body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-06-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-263&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0263/2008 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2008-09-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=15287&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-456 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0456/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2006-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: ALDE name: RESETARITS Karin
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/connect/index_en.htm title: Communications Networks, Content and Technology commissioner: REDING Viviane
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
CULT/6/41839
reference
2008/2011(INI)
title
Community media in Europe
legal_basis
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject