Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | BUDG | LEWANDOWSKI Janusz ( PPE-DE), HAUG Jutta ( PSE) | |
Former Responsible Committee | BUDG | HAUG Jutta ( PSE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | REGI | KOTEREC Miloš ( PSE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | AFCO | BOTOPOULOS Costas ( PSE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | DEVE | MARTENS Maria ( PPE-DE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | CULT | TRÜPEL Helga ( Verts/ALE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | AFET | DE KEYSER Véronique ( PSE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | PECH | FERNANDES Emanuel Jardim ( PSE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | AGRI | VIRRANKOSKI Kyösti ( ALDE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | ENVI | OLAJOS Péter ( PPE-DE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | EMPL | JÖNS Karin ( PSE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Former Committee Opinion | JURI | FRASSONI Monica ( Verts/ALE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | ECON | BERÈS Pervenche ( PSE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | CONT | ||
Former Committee Opinion | LIBE | DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP Bárbara ( PSE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | INTA | ||
Former Committee Opinion | IMCO | CREȚU Gabriela ( PSE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | TRAN | LICHTENBERGER Eva ( Verts/ALE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | PETI | ||
Former Committee Opinion | FEMM | GERINGER DE OEDENBERG Lidia Joanna ( PSE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: final adoption of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2009.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: 2009/165/EC, Euratom.
CONTENT: the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2009 has been finally adopted in accordance with the budgetary procedure ended on 18 December 2008. The Union’s budget is therefore adopted in accordance with the priorities set out by the budgetary authority and the vote in Parliament’s second reading (please see the summary of Parliament’s resolution of 18.12.2008).
The 2009 budget is the third one to be issued under the 2007-2013 multiannual financial framework which covers the period until 2013. In 2009, the biggest share of the EU budget – 45% or EUR 60 billion - will go to research, innovation, employment and regional development programmes, combining short and longer-term measures to help Europe respond to the current economic crisis as quickly and effectively as possible . An 11% increase in research and a 22% increase in the EU's innovation programme will help boost competitiveness in difficult times as well as EU efforts to move to a low-carbon economy.
Funds for agriculture remain stable, taking over 40% of EU cash, while spending on the environment and rural development will rise by 2.9%.
Europe's role in the world will also see spending grow in 2009, including EUR 0.6 billion for the EUR 1 billion food facility to help developing countries respond to rising food prices, decided by a joint agreement between the European Parliament and the Council.
In global figures, the budget 2009 amounts to EUR 133.8 billion in commitment appropriations. This corresponds to an increase of 2.5% compared to 2008, and represents 1.03% of Community GNI. A margin of EUR 3.2 billion is left under the expenditure ceiling of the financial framework.
In payment appropriations, the budget 2009 is set at EUR 116.1 billion , or 0.89% of GNI. This represents an increase of 0.3% on 2008, and leaves a margin of EUR 7.8 million beneath the ceiling for payment appropriations.
The 2009 budget is broken down heading by heading as follows (in brackets the % of the total EU budget):
Heading 1: Sustainable development : in 2009, almost EUR 12 billion of the EU budget in 2009 will go on projects to boost Europe's competitiveness, 6.2% more than in 2008. In its entirety, this heading includes EUR 60.2 billion in commitments and around EUR 46 billion in payment appropriations. It includes 2 sub-headings:
1a – Competitiveness for growth and employment : commitments under this heading amount to EUR 12 billion which includes funds for research which will rise by 11% for the second year running. A record investment of EUR 500 million will also be set aside for the EU's Competitiveness and Innovation programme (CIP) to finance ground-breaking sustainable technologies - an increase of 22% on 2008. More than EUR 1 billion will go to programmes to improve Europeans' skills, mainly through the Lifelong Learning Programme - a 6.5% rise on 2008; 1b – Cohesion for growth and employment : funding for cohesion will continue to grow in 2009 with nearly EUR 48.5 billion for Europe's regions (a 2.5% rise on 2008). This will also be strengthened by the recent agreement to accelerate Structural Funds financing in 2009, providing Member States with cash fast to support people hit by the crisis and increase financing for small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs). Efforts to integrate new Member States into common EU policies are also bearing fruit with 50% of all Cohesion and Structural Funds now going to the EU-12.
Heading 2: Preservation and management of natural resources : spending on agriculture will remain stable in 2009, absorbing more than EUR 40 billion. The shift within this policy area towards development in rural areas also means more spending on the environment the fight against climate change. Over 40% of rural development funding (EUR 13.6 billion) will be for environmental goals. On top of that, the LIFE+ environmental protection programme will grow by 19%, reaching EUR 317 million. The 22% increase in the EU's innovation programme will also help EU efforts to move to a low-carbon economy by financing sustainable technologies. In total, the amounts under this heading are characterised by the following: EUR 56.1 billion for market related expenditure and direct payments and EUR 52.5 billion in payment appropriations.
Heading 3: Citizenship, Freedom, Security and Justice : (1.1%) terrorism, crime as well as immigration are still big concerns for Europeans and support for these specific areas will see one of the biggest increases in spending in 2009 at EUR 864 million - up 18% from 2008. With EUR 1.5 billion in commitments (and EUR 1.3 in payments).
This heading is split into two separate headings:
Heading 3a : Freedom, Security and Justice: with EUR 864 million; Heading 3b : Citizenship (including assistance to youth and culture): with EUR 651 million in commitments.
Heading 4: the EU as a global player : the European Union will maintain a central role as a global player, with the budget for external actions increasing by 7.3% to EUR 8.1 billion. The recent surge in food prices has hit the most vulnerable in the world worst and the EU is stepping up its support by providing a Food Facility package of EUR 1 billion over 2008, 2009, 2010. The largest share - up to EUR 568 million - will come from the 2009 EU budget. Maintaining its role as a global player, the EU will also channel over EUR 8 billion into external policies – a 7% rise on 2008. Support for the peace process in the Middle East, in Afghanistan and ensuring stability in Kosovo will be key investments in 2009 – EUR 361 million for Palestine and EUR 231 million for Afghanistan and €261m for projects in Kosovo.
Heading 5 – Administration : (5.8%) costs related to the administration of all EU institutions total EUR 7.7 billion. For the Commission, the 2009 foresees the last tranche of 250 new posts following the 2007 enlargement to Bulgaria and Romania.
Heading 6 – Compensations : (0.2%) the final tranche of budgetary compensation of EUR 209.1 million will be available in 2009, to ensure that Bulgaria and Romania keep a positive budgetary balance in the years immediately following their accession to the European Union.
The European Parliament adopted by 539 votes to 33, with 27 abstentions, a resolution approving, in second reading, the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2009 as modified by the Council (all sections) and Letters of amendment Nos 1, 2 and 3/2009 to the draft general budget of the European Union.
The report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Jutta HAUG (PES, DE) and Janusz LEWANDOWSKI (EPP-ED, PL), on behalf of the Committee on Budgets.
In its resolution, the Parliament sets the overall level of expenditure as follows:
EUR 133 846 million in commitment appropriations, equivalent to 1.03% of EU GNI; EUR 116 093 million in payment appropriations, equivalent to 0.89% of EU GNI.
It notes that this leaves a significant margin of EUR 7 762 million beneath the payments ceiling of the multi-annual financial framework (MFF) for 2009, while underlining the joint commitment of both arms of the budgetary authority to a prompt provision of additional payment appropriations , particularly in the event of structural policies being more quickly implemented during the budgetary year.
In terms of budget conciliation , the Parliament welcomes the overall agreement reached on 21 November 2008, especially with regard to the financing of the Food Facility . It is extremely concerned, however, about the possible effects of a recession on European citizens and regrets, therefore, that at the conciliation meeting, the Commission was reluctant to disclose any information on the possible budgetary impact of its coming proposal on tackling the economic crisis (see COM(2008)800 ). Yet, this plan will have a significant impact on Budget 2009. The Parliament therefore requests the Commission to provide concrete figures relating to its implementation. In an amendment adopted in plenary, the Parliament calls on the Council to enter into negotiations on the basis of the Commission's proposal for a revision of the multi-annual financial framework (MFF) 2007-2013 for EUR 5 billion in the framework of the proposed European Economic Recovery Plan.
Do not delay the environmental commitments of the budget : even if the crisis will have detrimental effects on investment, the Parliament insists that the current crisis should not be used as a pretext to delay spending towards "green" investments, but should rather be used as an extra incentive. In this context, the plenary reiterates the importance of the budgetary review planned for 2009, which should not be limited to a theoretical vision what the budget could look like after 2013, but which should include bold proposals for a shift in programming at the time of the mid-term review of the multi-annual programmes to respond to the current crisis, taking into account the challenges posed by climate change.
Moreover, the Parliament recalls that initiatives for sustainable development, growth in jobs and support for SMEs and for research and innovation are of the utmost importance in the current economic situation and have to be top priorities reflected in the Union's budget for 2009.
At the same time, Parliament approves Letters of amendment Nos 1, 2 and 3 to the draft budget.
Level of payments : while Parliament is overall satisfied with the agreement of 21 November with the Council, it strongly regrets the unprecedented disparity between the level of commitments and payments in 2009. It points out that there is some danger of future budgets becoming unrealistic and reiterates the terms of the joint declaration adopted at the budget conciliation meeting, instructing the Commission to provide for higher payment appropriations, if the amounts in the budget for 2009 prove insufficient.
Better implementation of the EU budget : once again, the Parliament insists on the importance of effective budget implementation and calls for unpaid commitments to be reduced in light of the very modest overall level of payments: this is particularly true for heading 1b of the budget which finances both activities aimed at tackling climate change and growth for jobs initiatives. Moreover, the Parliament raises the recurring problem of heading 2 and reiterates its view that it is necessary to accelerate the implementation of structural and cohesion funds. The plenary also notes with great concern that the Commission has, on the basis of evidence, seen fit to cut EUR 220 million of funding for Bulgaria. It therefore asks the Commission to support both Bulgaria and Romania in their reforms and to report to Parliament every three months on problems or irregularities in implementing EU funds.
Sectoral issues : the Parliament welcomes the agreement on the EUR 1 billion financing over three years for the Food Facility, reached in the conciliation meeting (EUR 420 million will be financed via the flexibility instrument, while EUR 340 million will come from the Emergency Aid Reserve and EUR 240 million will be redeployed within heading 4). The plenary recalls the Commission's commitment to present to the budgetary authority an assessment of the situation within heading 4 , accompanied, if necessary, by relevant proposals, in the course of 2009, taking into account political evolution as well as budget execution.
Furthermore, the Parliament confirms in second reading the creation of new budgetary lines: (i) climate change; (ii) the Small Businesses Act (SBA); (iii) the financial instrument for the adaptation of the fishing fleet to the economic consequences of fuel prices; (iv) the EU Baltic Sea Strategy; (v) aid for rehabilitation and reconstruction of Georgia.
It also recalls that the reductions in the administrative expenditure lines of some multi-annual programmes, that the budgetary authority has decided on for 2009, must under no circumstances lead to reductions in the overall co-decided envelopes of the programmes concerned. The Commission should therefore compensate for the amounts reduced in later years of the programme period, preferably on the operational lines of the programmes.
Adequate funding of heading 4 : the Parliament expresses its regret that, once more, heading 4 has been under steady pressure since its available margins are not sufficient to finance priorities. It reiterates its concerns that the funds available in this heading do not allow the Union to assume its role as a global player despite its various declarations of intent. The plenary expects the ongoing mid-term review of the current MFF to provide additional resources for the growing commitments under heading 4, as the Union’s credibility in third countries is at stake. In fact, if, year after year, the budgetary authority is not able to provide the adequate financing to the EU’s external political commitments, the Union will lose its influence.
The Parliament also regrets that appropriations for commitments for Palestine (EUR 300 million in 2009), have decreased by 21% compared to the level of funds committed in 2008. The Commission will likely present transfer requests in the course of 2009 to increase appropriations for Palestine. In terms of Kosovo, the plenary notes that appropriations for assistance to this region of the Western Balkans will only just suffice to keep pace with reforms and investment. However, it is important for these funds to be monitored, which is why the Parliament insists on a proper follow-up of the conclusions of the final report from the ITF (Investigation Task Force), as well as on the creation of a successor organisation for combating fraud and financial irregularities.
However, the Parliament welcomes the fact that the Union has decided to contribute to the reconstruction process in Georgia with a pledge of up to EUR 500 million over 3 years.
Heading 5 of the budget: finding a solution for European schools : the Parliament has decided to maintain a reduced amount of the Commission's administrative expenditure in reserve and restores fully its first reading position as regards the "other institutions", including the decision to frontload some building expenditure to 2009. Under this budgetary heading, the plenary expresses its concern, in an amendment, about the situation of present and future young pupils in the European schools in Brussels resulting from the delayed and still pending opening of the fourth school in Laeken and the current enrolment procedure leading to long and unacceptable travelling times for the children. The Parliament expects the Commission, in cooperation with the Secretariat General of the European schools in Brussels, to present a revised enrolment procedure by the end of March 2009 with objective and comprehensible criteria (including principal residence and already enrolled siblings), which will come into force with the next enrolment period.
Other points raised by the Parliament can be summarised as follows:
School fruit scheme : the Parliament welcomes the political agreement of the Council on the legal base for a school fruit scheme and expects the programme to start in time for the 2009/2010 school year. It regrets, however, that the Council refused to create a token entry ("p.m.") in the budget for this; Food programme for the most deprived persons in the European Union : the Parliament welcomes the financing to improve the current food distribution programme for the most deprived persons in the Union by increasing the budget to around EUR 500 million; Communication policy : the Parliament regrets the lack of consistency and coherence in communication measures from the Commission. It wishes for an adequate level of harmonisation in the presentation of communication policy with the aim of developing one recognisable EU trademark to be used in all communication measures; Pilot projects and preparatory actions : the Parliament proposes a series of initiatives and innovative projects that respond to the real need of EU citizens. It has decided to allocate an amount of EUR 124.4 million to pilot projects and preparatory actions, as agreed upon in the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline (IIA); Decentralised agencies : the Parliament maintains its 1st reading position as regards restoring the amounts proposed in the PDB for decentralised agencies. It decides to maintain the increase in the amounts for operational expenses of FRONTEX, in order to enable it to run permanent missions all year round. It has also decided to maintain the increase in the amounts for tackling illegal immigration, to bolster the European Refugee Fund to facilitate solidarity between Members States, to maintain in the reserve one third of the amounts for its operational expenses for GALILEO pending the adoption of the revised legal basis, to maintain in the reserve 10% of the amounts for administrative expenses of European Food Safety Authority until it has been informed of the results of the "Staff satisfaction survey" carried out in 2007.
The Committee on Budgets unanimously adopted the joint report drafted by Jutta HAUG (PES, DE) and Janusz LEWANDOWSKI (EPP-ED, PL) confirming the 2 nd reading of the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2009 as modified by the Council (all sections) . It sets the overall level of payments at EUR 116 096 million , equivalent to 0.89% of EU GNI leaving a significant margin of EUR 7 762 million beneath the payments ceiling of the multi-annual financial framework (MFF) for 2009. MEPs underlines the joint commitment of both arms of the budgetary authority to a prompt provision of additional payment appropriations, particularly in the event of structural policies being more quickly implemented during the budgetary year.
Key issues outcome of the conciliation, overall figures and amending letters :
Budget conciliation : MEPs welcome the overall agreement on Budget 2009, reached in the traditional budgetary conciliation meeting with Council on 21 November 2008, especially with regard to the financing of the Food Facility . They are extremely concerned, however, about the possible effects of a recession on European citizens and regret, therefore, that at the conciliation meeting, the Commission was reluctant to disclose any information on the possible budgetary impact of its coming proposal on tackling the economic crisis (see COM(2008)800 ).
MEPs point out that this plan, if approved, will have a significant impact on Budget 2009 and request the Commission to further clarify this impact by providing the European Parliament, as one arm of the budgetary authority, with further details on the scope of its proposal and concrete figures relating to its implementation particularly in respect of the financial programming. They insist that the current crisis not be used as a pretext to delay a much needed reorientation of spending towards "green" investments, but should rather be used as an extra incentive to press ahead with such reorientation.
MEPs reiterate that initiatives for sustainable development, growth in jobs and support for SMEs and for research and innovation are of the utmost importance in the current economic situation and have to be top priorities reflected in the Union's budget for 2009. They support amending letters 1, 2, 3 and 4 to the preliminary draft budget (PDB) 2009.
As regards the level of payments , MEPs can accept the level of payments agreed with Council; however they reiterate their growing concern about the low payments and the subsequent disparity between the level of commitments and payments, which will reach an unprecedented extent in 2009.
Again, they underline the vital importance of effective budget implementation and of reducing unpaid commitments in light of this very modest overall level of payments and calls on the Commission and on Member States to do their utmost to implement, in particular, lines in heading 1b of the MFF, because this sub-heading not only finances numerous important policies and activities aimed at tackling climate change but also supports growth for jobs initiatives contributing to economic growth. MEPs stress that improvement and simplification measures are needed in order to accelerate the implementation of structural and cohesion funds.
Sectoral issues : MEPs welcome the agreement on the EUR 1 billion financing over three years for the Food Facility (EUR 420 million will be financed by fresh money via the flexibility instrument, while EUR 340 million will come from the Emergency Aid Reserve and EUR 240 million will be redeployed within heading 4).
The committee has taken note of the Commission's Letter of Executability regarding the amendments to the draft budget adopted by Parliament at 1 st reading, however, they consider it unacceptable that the Commission presented this document at such a late stage in the procedure.
MEPs have decided to create new budgetary lines on climate change, on the Small Business Act (SBA), on the financial instrument for the adaptation of the fishing fleet to the economic consequences of fuel prices, on the EU Baltic Sea Strategy and on aid for rehabilitation and reconstruction of Georgia.
MEPs reiterate that the reductions in the administrative expenditure lines of some multi-annual programmes that the budgetary authority has decided on for 2009 must under no circumstances lead to reductions in the overall co-decided envelopes of the programmes concerned. The Commission should compensate for the amounts reduced in later years of the programme period, preferably on the operational lines of the programmes.
Other specific issues dealt with in this report can be summarised as follows:
European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) : MEPs confirm its decision taken in Budget 2008 to include the EIT in the policy area "Research" and to finance its governing structure, given its administrative nature, under heading 5 of the MFF. School fruit scheme : MEPs welcome the political agreement of the Council on the legal base for such a programme; expects the programme to start as soon as the legal base is adopted and in time for the 2009/2010 school year. They regret that the Council did not accept the Commission's proposal to create already a token entry ("p.m.") in the budget for this issue. Food programme for the most deprived persons in the European Union : MEPs welcome the financing proposed by the Commission to improve the current food distribution programme for the most deprived persons in the Union by increasing the budget by two thirds to around EUR 500 million for 2009. Communication policy : MEPs regret the lack of consistency and coherence regularly evident in communication measures from the Commission. They wish for an adequate level of harmonisation in presentation of communication policy with the aim of developing one recognisable EU trademark to be used in all communication measures.
Heading 4 : MEPs regret that, once more, heading 4 has been under steady pressure since its available margins are not sufficient to finance new priorities. The insufficient funds do not allow the Union to assume its role as a global player despite its various declarations of intent. MEPs fear that the Union's credibility in third countries may be irreversibly altered for the worse if, year after year, the budgetary authority is not able to provide the adequate financing to its political commitments. They note with concern that appropriations for commitments for Palestine in 2009 will amount to EUR 300 million, which represents a decrease of 21% compared to the level of funds committed in 2008 after transfers. They are aware that the Commission will likely present transfer requests in the course of 2009 to increase appropriations for Palestine. The report notes that appropriations for assistance to Kosovo will only just suffice to keep pace with reforms and investment. On the other hand, MEPs welcome the fact that the Union has decided to contribute to the reconstruction process in Georgia and has committed its financial assistance accordingly with a pledge of up to EUR 500 million over 3 years, based on certain political conditions. In addition, they decide to maintain its first reading position as regards encouraging the economic development of the Turkish Cypriot community. Heading 5 : MEPs decide to maintain a reduced amount of the Commission's administrative expenditure (heading 5) in reserve, notably in the areas of staff and building expenditure. They also restore fully its first reading position as regards the "other institutions", including the decision to frontload some building expenditure to 2009.
Pilot projects and preparatory actions : MEPs propose a range of initiatives and innovative projects that respond to the real needs of the Union's citizens. They decide to allocate an amount of EUR 124.4 million to pilot projects and preparatory actions for the budgetary year 2009 as agreed upon in the IIA.
Decentralised agencies : MEPs maintain their 1 st reading position as regards restoring the amounts proposed in the PDB for decentralised agencies. They decide to maintain the increase in the amounts for operational expenses of FRONTEX, in order to enable it to run permanent missions all year round. They have also decided to : maintain the increase in the amounts for tackling illegal immigration; bolstering the European Refugee Fund to facilitate solidarity between Members States; maintain in the reserve one third of the amounts for its operational expenses for GALILEO pending the adoption of the revised legal basis; maintain in the reserve 10% of the amounts for administrative expenses of European Food Safety Authority until it has been informed of the results of the "Staff satisfaction survey" carried out in 2007.
PURPOSE: presentation of the Council’s second reading of the 2009 budget.
CONTENT: at its meeting of 21 November 2008, the ECOFIN Council (Budget) reached agreement on the following points:
general conclusions on the second reading of the 2009 budget;
the establishment of amending budget no. 9/2008 including items concerning the funding of the food facility in 2008; the establishment of amending budget no. 10/2008 concerning the financing of the EU Solidarity Fund in favour of Cyprus; the establishment of amending letter 2/2009 including the budgetary aspects concerning the financing of the food facility in 2009; the establishment of amending letter 3/2009 ensuring the funding of the reflection group set up by the European Council.
The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission reached agreement to :
accept preliminary draft amending budget No 10/2008, as amended by the Commission, and to include in it the budgetary aspects concerning the financing of the food facility in 2008; accept preliminary draft amending budget No 11/2008 as proposed by the Commission; accept amending letter No 2/2009, except for the creation of the new item relating to the programme to promote the consumption of fruit at school, and to include in that amending letter the budgetary aspects concerning the financing of the food facility in 2009; accept amending letter No 3/2009, as proposed by the Commission; set the total amount of payment appropriations (in absolute figures) for the 2009 budget at EUR 116 096 million , including the payment appropriations allotted for the food facility.
At the same time, at the conciliation meeting several declarations were adopted which may be summarised as follows:
Technical results of Council’s 2 nd reading: overall, the amounts are as follows:
EUR 133 016 153 144 in commitment appropriations;
EUR 114 364 223 474 in payment appropriations (representing 0.88% of GNI).
The Council amended the budget in the following way:
a) to maintain the draft budget established by the Council, as amended by letter of amendment No. 1/2009, with regard to competitiveness for growth and employment ( sub-heading 1a of the Financial Framework);
b) to maintain the draft budget established by the Council with regard to cohesion for growth and employment ( sub-heading 1b of the Financial Framework);
c) regarding the preservation and management of natural resources ( heading 2 of the Financial Framework): i) approval of letter of amendment No. 2 to the draft budget for 2009 for the elements relating to agriculture, except for the creation of the new item relating to the programme to promote the consumption of fruit in schools, pending the adoption of the relevant legal basis; ii) to maintain the draft budget established by the Council, as amended by letter of amendment No. 1/2009, for the other budget lines of heading 2 which are not affected by letter of amendment No. 2/2009; iii) additional reduction of EUR 180 million in the amount entered in the draft budget drawn up by the Council for the budget line for clearance of accounts;
d) to re-establish the draft budget established by the Council with regard to the other budget lines in the field of freedom, security and justice ( sub-heading 3a of the Financial Framework);
e) to maintain the draft budget established by the Council, as amended by letter of amendment No. 1/2009, with regard to citizenship ( sub-heading 3b of the Financial Framework);
f) to maintain the draft budget established by the Council, as amended by letter of amendment No. 1/2009, with regard to the EU as a global partner ( heading 4 of the Financial Framework), and to include in letter of amendment No. 2/2009 the budgetary aspects relating to the financing of the Food Facility in 2009, as resulting from the joint declaration on the financing of the Food Facility;
g) to maintain the draft budget established by the Council with regard to administrative expenditure ( heading 5 of the Financial Framework), as amended by letters of amendment No. 1/2009 and No. 3/2009, apart from the European Parliament amendments to its own section of the budget ("Gentlemen's
Agreement") which were accepted.
At the same time, several declarations were adopted during the conciliation meeting which may be summarised as follows:
1. a Joint Declaration on the financing of a facility for rapid response to soaring food prices in developing countries: the European Parliament and the Council agreed to finance the Food Facility over a 3-year period within heading 4 of the multiannual financial framework (MFF). The total amount of EUR 1 billion available in commitments for the Food Facility will be
shared out over the years as follows:
EUR 262 million in 2008, EUR 568 million in 2009 and EUR 170 million in 2010.
The Council and Parliament envisage the following amounts:
- EUR 240 million in commitment appropriations will be redeployed within heading 4 from the Instrument for Stability (budget article 19 06 01 01) of which EUR 70 million in 2009. Regarding the redeployments for 2010, the Commission is invited to present a revised financial programming in order to ensure an orderly progression of the amounts planned over the period 2010-2013, while keeping the annual level of the margin unchanged.
The food prices crisis is a new and objective circumstance under the terms of Point 37 of the Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) which justifies the redeployment from a non-programmed crisis instrument.
- EUR 420 million in commitment appropriations will be made available through the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument for the 2009 budget.
- EUR 340 million in commitment appropriations will be made available through the Emergency Aid Reserve in the following manner:
EUR 22 million from appropriations still available in the 2008 budget; EUR 78 million from the appropriations budgeted for the year 2009; EUR 240 million through a one-off increase in the amount of the Emergency Aid Reserve to be budgeted in 2008.
The Commission will propose an amendment of the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (IIA) of 17 May 2006 as regards Point 25 to provide the additional funding required for the proposed Food Facility.
The one-off increase in the commitment appropriations for the Emergency Aid Reserve for the year 2008 will be formalised by a joint decision of the three institutions amending the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006.
2. Coordination of Community Assistance (Food Facility and EDF): taking into account that ACP countries could benefit from EU assistance from both the general budget of the European Union and the European Development Fund, the three Institutions declare that, when implementing the Facility for rapid response to soaring prices in developing countries (hereinafter "Food Facility"), special attention should be paid to the coordination of aid originating from these various sources in order to maximise the synergy and the possible results. In this context, the ACP partner countries should also be encouraged to adapt, if necessary, the objectives and priorities of their programming regarding future cooperation under the EDF, ensuring consistency and complementarity with the objectives as foreseen by the Food Facility. The Commission will present a list of programmes financed by the EDF which could include elements related to food security.
3. Improving the visibility of Community assistance: the European Parliament and the Council stress that the visibility of Community assistance in third countries is a legitimate concern for the European Union and should be fully taken into account for donorship in a multi-annual context. With a view to maintaining public and political support for the EU external action, they call on the Commission to present together with the PDB for the year 2010 a report with a list of initiatives taken to improve the visibility of EU external aid, without compromising its efficiency and effectiveness, especially when implemented through international organisations.
4. Implementation of the cohesion policy: without prejudging the upcoming proposals from the Commission in the context of the economic downturn, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission:
recognise that, in view of the challenges posed by the current economic downturn, the economy may benefit from accelerating the implementation of structural and cohesion funds within the ceilings of the agreed multiannual financial framework 2007-2013; recognise that, under the established control framework, interim payments cannot take place until management and control systems in Member States have been judged to be compliant with the requirements and, as concerns major projects, until such projects have been adopted by the Commission; encourage the Member States to submit the description of their management and control systems and the compliance assessments as soon as possible so as to allow the Commission to rapidly start their analysis.
Within this framework, the European Parliament and the Council invite the Commission to take the necessary measures, within the existing legal framework, to rapidly assess the most critical aspects of the Member States’ management and control systems (MCS), to accelerate the examination of applications for major projects so as to facilitate their launch. They also call on the Commission to cooperate closely with the Member States in order to have a rapid agreement of all aspects of compliance of the MCS and to submit a monthly report to the budgetary authority on the approval of the MCS and the major projects. The Commission is also invited to present a report on the implementation together with the PDB for the purpose of the budgetary and discharge procedures.
5. Agencies: the European Parliament and the Council have agreed on the Commission proposal for the creation of an Interinstitutional working group on agencies and ask for the first meeting to take place as soon as possible.
6. Payment appropriations: the European Parliament and the Council ask the Commission to submit an amending budget if the appropriations entered in the 2009 budget are insufficient to cover expenditure under sub-Heading 1a (Competitiveness for growth and employment), sub-Heading 1b (Cohesion for growth and employment) as it could be justified within the current legal framework in the light of a possible acceleration of the implementation of structural policies, Heading 2 (Preservation and management of natural resources) and Heading 4 (EU as a global partner). In that context, the European Parliament and the Council will consider the appropriate financing of any possible proposal that the Commission could make for new initiatives, particularly regarding the economic crisis.
Lastly, the European Parliament asks the Commission to present in the budget review an evaluation of the situation of heading 4 in order to examine and to review the role of the EU as a global partner in a multiannual context. It expresses its deepest concern as to the extremely low level of payments , far below the MFF, which does not correspond to the real challenges of the European Union in a situation of economic crisis. It therefore calls on the Commission and the Member States to adopt all measures possible to ensure its adequate implementation.
On 28 October 2008, the Commission forwarded to the Council letter of amendment No. 2 to the preliminary draft budget for 2009. Since then, the Commission has made a new estimate of agricultural expenditure as compared with the preliminary draft budget (PDB) for 2009. The new estimates drawn up by the Commission take account of the situation on the various agricultural markets and of all the legislative decisions and proposals adopted in the agricultural sector since the PDB was established.
New estimates : the new estimates lead to an overall reduction of EUR 1 280.4 million in c/a and EUR 1 227.9 in p/a as against the estimates in the 2009 PDB.
These figures result from:
on the one hand, an updating of estimates to the tune of + EUR 361 million broken down into an increase in requirements in certain sectors relating to Interventions in agricultural markets (+ EUR 421 million), certain savings in the Direct aid sector (- EUR 87 million) and certain minor adjustments (+ EUR 26.3 million); on the other hand, an increase in assigned revenue of + EUR 1 641 million resulting from the updating of the estimate of assigned revenue for 2009 (+ EUR 307 million) and the carryover of assigned revenue not spent in 2008 (+ EUR 1 334 million).
Letter of amendment No. 2 to the preliminary draft budget for 2009 also proposes the creation of new budget lines for the Food Facility in Title 2 and the placing in reserve of a total of EUR 250 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 900 million in payment appropriations, pending adoption of the legal basis.
Finally, the letter of amendment proposes amendments to the budgetary remarks concerning various items and changes to the nomenclature concerning the new Items 05 02 08 12 (School fruit scheme) and 05 03 01 99 (Other (Decoupled direct aids), giving them a "p.m." entry.
Following the conclusions of the Conciliation meeting with the European Parliament and the Commission of 21 November 2008, the Council agreed to accept the letter of amendment as proposed by the Commission with:
the exception of the creation of the new Item 05 02 08 12 (School fruit scheme); the inclusion of the following new amounts regarding the financing of the Food Facility: EUR 480 million in c/a and EUR 440 million in p/a on Article 21 02 03 (Rapid response to food price increases in developing countries) and EUR 10 million in c/a and p/a on Item 21 01 04 05 (Rapid response to food price increases in developing countries - Expenditure on administrative management); - EUR 134.77 million in c/a and EUR 140 million in p/a on Item 19 06 01 01 (Crisis response and preparedness(Instrument for Stability); the inclusion of modified comments for Article 40 02 42 (Emergency Aid Reserve).
On 27 November 2008, the Council established letter of amendment No. 2 to the draft budget for the financial year 2009 on the basis of the elements set out above and as set out in the technical annex to this explanatory memorandum (see Council doc. 16259/08 ADD 1 ).
On 17 November 2008, the Commission sent the Council letter of amendment No. 3 to the preliminary draft budget for 2009 concerning Section II - Council.
This letter of amendment covers the expenditure relating to the proceedings of the Reflection Group established by the European Council on 14 December 2007 (please refer to procedure file BUD/2008/2026B concerning the 2009 budget “Other sections”).
Given the specific activity of the Reflection Group and for the sake of transparency, it is proposed to include the expenses relating to this Working Group (EUR 1 060 000) in a new Title 4 which is separate from Section II – Council – of the General Budget.
This amending letter is neutral in terms of the budget with the required appropriations to be taken from the contingency reserve (EUR 2.5 million), which is included in the preliminary draft budget for 2009.
On 27 November 2008, the Council established letter of amendment No. 3 to the draft budget for the financial year 2009 on the basis of letter of amendment No. 3 to the preliminary draft budget for 2009 as submitted by the Commission.
PURPOSE: presentation of the Council’s second reading of the 2009 budget.
CONTENT: at its meeting of 21 November 2008, the ECOFIN Council (Budget) reached agreement on the following points:
general conclusions on the second reading of the 2009 budget;
the establishment of amending budget no. 9/2008 including items concerning the funding of the food facility in 2008; the establishment of amending budget no. 10/2008 concerning the financing of the EU Solidarity Fund in favour of Cyprus; the establishment of amending letter 2/2009 including the budgetary aspects concerning the financing of the food facility in 2009; the establishment of amending letter 3/2009 ensuring the funding of the reflection group set up by the European Council.
The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission reached agreement to :
accept preliminary draft amending budget No 10/2008, as amended by the Commission, and to include in it the budgetary aspects concerning the financing of the food facility in 2008; accept preliminary draft amending budget No 11/2008 as proposed by the Commission; accept amending letter No 2/2009, except for the creation of the new item relating to the programme to promote the consumption of fruit at school, and to include in that amending letter the budgetary aspects concerning the financing of the food facility in 2009; accept amending letter No 3/2009, as proposed by the Commission; set the total amount of payment appropriations (in absolute figures) for the 2009 budget at EUR 116 096 million , including the payment appropriations allotted for the food facility.
At the same time, at the conciliation meeting several declarations were adopted which may be summarised as follows:
Technical results of Council’s 2 nd reading: overall, the amounts are as follows:
EUR 133 016 153 144 in commitment appropriations;
EUR 114 364 223 474 in payment appropriations (representing 0.88% of GNI).
The Council amended the budget in the following way:
a) to maintain the draft budget established by the Council, as amended by letter of amendment No. 1/2009, with regard to competitiveness for growth and employment ( sub-heading 1a of the Financial Framework);
b) to maintain the draft budget established by the Council with regard to cohesion for growth and employment ( sub-heading 1b of the Financial Framework);
c) regarding the preservation and management of natural resources ( heading 2 of the Financial Framework): i) approval of letter of amendment No. 2 to the draft budget for 2009 for the elements relating to agriculture, except for the creation of the new item relating to the programme to promote the consumption of fruit in schools, pending the adoption of the relevant legal basis; ii) to maintain the draft budget established by the Council, as amended by letter of amendment No. 1/2009, for the other budget lines of heading 2 which are not affected by letter of amendment No. 2/2009; iii) additional reduction of EUR 180 million in the amount entered in the draft budget drawn up by the Council for the budget line for clearance of accounts;
d) to re-establish the draft budget established by the Council with regard to the other budget lines in the field of freedom, security and justice ( sub-heading 3a of the Financial Framework);
e) to maintain the draft budget established by the Council, as amended by letter of amendment No. 1/2009, with regard to citizenship ( sub-heading 3b of the Financial Framework);
f) to maintain the draft budget established by the Council, as amended by letter of amendment No. 1/2009, with regard to the EU as a global partner ( heading 4 of the Financial Framework), and to include in letter of amendment No. 2/2009 the budgetary aspects relating to the financing of the Food Facility in 2009, as resulting from the joint declaration on the financing of the Food Facility;
g) to maintain the draft budget established by the Council with regard to administrative expenditure ( heading 5 of the Financial Framework), as amended by letters of amendment No. 1/2009 and No. 3/2009, apart from the European Parliament amendments to its own section of the budget ("Gentlemen's
Agreement") which were accepted.
At the same time, several declarations were adopted during the conciliation meeting which may be summarised as follows:
1. a Joint Declaration on the financing of a facility for rapid response to soaring food prices in developing countries: the European Parliament and the Council agreed to finance the Food Facility over a 3-year period within heading 4 of the multiannual financial framework (MFF). The total amount of EUR 1 billion available in commitments for the Food Facility will be
shared out over the years as follows:
EUR 262 million in 2008, EUR 568 million in 2009 and EUR 170 million in 2010.
The Council and Parliament envisage the following amounts:
- EUR 240 million in commitment appropriations will be redeployed within heading 4 from the Instrument for Stability (budget article 19 06 01 01) of which EUR 70 million in 2009. Regarding the redeployments for 2010, the Commission is invited to present a revised financial programming in order to ensure an orderly progression of the amounts planned over the period 2010-2013, while keeping the annual level of the margin unchanged.
The food prices crisis is a new and objective circumstance under the terms of Point 37 of the Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) which justifies the redeployment from a non-programmed crisis instrument.
- EUR 420 million in commitment appropriations will be made available through the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument for the 2009 budget.
- EUR 340 million in commitment appropriations will be made available through the Emergency Aid Reserve in the following manner:
EUR 22 million from appropriations still available in the 2008 budget; EUR 78 million from the appropriations budgeted for the year 2009; EUR 240 million through a one-off increase in the amount of the Emergency Aid Reserve to be budgeted in 2008.
The Commission will propose an amendment of the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (IIA) of 17 May 2006 as regards Point 25 to provide the additional funding required for the proposed Food Facility.
The one-off increase in the commitment appropriations for the Emergency Aid Reserve for the year 2008 will be formalised by a joint decision of the three institutions amending the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006.
2. Coordination of Community Assistance (Food Facility and EDF): taking into account that ACP countries could benefit from EU assistance from both the general budget of the European Union and the European Development Fund, the three Institutions declare that, when implementing the Facility for rapid response to soaring prices in developing countries (hereinafter "Food Facility"), special attention should be paid to the coordination of aid originating from these various sources in order to maximise the synergy and the possible results. In this context, the ACP partner countries should also be encouraged to adapt, if necessary, the objectives and priorities of their programming regarding future cooperation under the EDF, ensuring consistency and complementarity with the objectives as foreseen by the Food Facility. The Commission will present a list of programmes financed by the EDF which could include elements related to food security.
3. Improving the visibility of Community assistance: the European Parliament and the Council stress that the visibility of Community assistance in third countries is a legitimate concern for the European Union and should be fully taken into account for donorship in a multi-annual context. With a view to maintaining public and political support for the EU external action, they call on the Commission to present together with the PDB for the year 2010 a report with a list of initiatives taken to improve the visibility of EU external aid, without compromising its efficiency and effectiveness, especially when implemented through international organisations.
4. Implementation of the cohesion policy: without prejudging the upcoming proposals from the Commission in the context of the economic downturn, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission:
recognise that, in view of the challenges posed by the current economic downturn, the economy may benefit from accelerating the implementation of structural and cohesion funds within the ceilings of the agreed multiannual financial framework 2007-2013; recognise that, under the established control framework, interim payments cannot take place until management and control systems in Member States have been judged to be compliant with the requirements and, as concerns major projects, until such projects have been adopted by the Commission; encourage the Member States to submit the description of their management and control systems and the compliance assessments as soon as possible so as to allow the Commission to rapidly start their analysis.
Within this framework, the European Parliament and the Council invite the Commission to take the necessary measures, within the existing legal framework, to rapidly assess the most critical aspects of the Member States’ management and control systems (MCS), to accelerate the examination of applications for major projects so as to facilitate their launch. They also call on the Commission to cooperate closely with the Member States in order to have a rapid agreement of all aspects of compliance of the MCS and to submit a monthly report to the budgetary authority on the approval of the MCS and the major projects. The Commission is also invited to present a report on the implementation together with the PDB for the purpose of the budgetary and discharge procedures.
5. Agencies: the European Parliament and the Council have agreed on the Commission proposal for the creation of an Interinstitutional working group on agencies and ask for the first meeting to take place as soon as possible.
6. Payment appropriations: the European Parliament and the Council ask the Commission to submit an amending budget if the appropriations entered in the 2009 budget are insufficient to cover expenditure under sub-Heading 1a (Competitiveness for growth and employment), sub-Heading 1b (Cohesion for growth and employment) as it could be justified within the current legal framework in the light of a possible acceleration of the implementation of structural policies, Heading 2 (Preservation and management of natural resources) and Heading 4 (EU as a global partner). In that context, the European Parliament and the Council will consider the appropriate financing of any possible proposal that the Commission could make for new initiatives, particularly regarding the economic crisis.
Lastly, the European Parliament asks the Commission to present in the budget review an evaluation of the situation of heading 4 in order to examine and to review the role of the EU as a global partner in a multiannual context. It expresses its deepest concern as to the extremely low level of payments , far below the MFF, which does not correspond to the real challenges of the European Union in a situation of economic crisis. It therefore calls on the Commission and the Member States to adopt all measures possible to ensure its adequate implementation.
PURPOSE: presentation of amending letter No 2 to the preliminary draft budget 2009.
CONTENT: this ad hoc amending letter (AL No 2/2009) to the preliminary draft budget 2009, concerns the update of the estimated needs for agricultural expenditure for 2009 .
To recall, the Interinstitutional Agreement ( IIA ) on budgetary discipline and sound financial management provides that, "if it considers it necessary, the Commission may present to the two arms of the budgetary authority an ad hoc letter of amendment to update the figures underlying the estimate of agricultural expenditure in the preliminary draft budget (PDB) and/or to correct, on the basis of the most recent information available concerning fisheries agreements in force on 1 January of the financial year concerned, the amounts and their breakdown between the appropriations entered in the operational items for international fisheries agreements and those entered in reserve." This letter of amendment must be sent to the budgetary authority by the end of October.
This ad hoc amending letter (AL No 2/2009) to the preliminary draft budget 2009 contains a careful, line by line update of the estimated needs for agricultural expenditure. In addition to changing market factors, the AL also incorporates legislative decisions adopted in the agricultural sector since the PDB was drawn up, revised estimates of needs for some direct payments, as well as any proposals, which are expected to have effect during the coming budget year. The AL is based, in the same way as the PDB itself, on the needs of the Community as a whole.
As far as the market measures are concerned, no breakdown of the appropriations between Member States is available. In addition, it must be stressed that these appropriations are to be understood as a forecast and not as an objective of expenditure. The actual expenditure will depend , in particular, on actual market conditions, on the actual euro-dollar exchange rate, and on the rhythm of the payments by Member States . Since this is compulsory expenditure, whatever the amount a Member State is obliged to pay in accordance with the regulations – within the limits set by the financial framework - will be reimbursed in full.
For clarification and transparency purposes, some budgetary comments have been updated.
Conclusions : according to the present Amending Letter, overall appropriations for Heading 2 are estimated at EUR 56 495.5 million, leaving a margin of EUR 3 143.5 million in commitment appropriations below the corresponding ceiling of the Financial Framework. The commitment appropriations for agricultural expenditure (including veterinary and fisheries expenditure financed under EAGF) amount to EUR 41 579.9 million, a r eduction of EUR 1 280.4 million compared to the PDB 2009 .
As far as the international fisheries agreements are concerned, no change is foreseen.
This amending letter also proposes the creation of new budget lines for the " Food Facility " (rapid response to food price increases in developing countries) in 2009, pending the adoption of the legal base.
It also takes into consideration the Commission’s current revision of the 2009 budgetary needs for the eradication of bluetongue disease, at the request of many Member States. After analysis of past execution and assessment of the situation, the Commission will in early 2009 make the necessary proposals for adjusting the 2009 budget with an additional amount of approximately EUR 100 million on top of the amount of EUR 62 million proposed in the PDB 2009, as part of a multi-annual strategy for dealing with this disease in a sustainable way.
The corrections made in the PDB, in conformity with amending letter 2/2009 can be presented as follows:
Commitment appropriations: - EUR 1 030 200 000 under heading 2 of the Financial Framework (Preservation and Management of Natural Resources, of which market related expenditure and direct payments);
Payment appropriations: - EUR 377 700 000 under the same heading.
The European Parliament adopted, by 509 votes to 60 against 25 abstentions, a resolution on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2009 and letter of amendment No 1/2009.
The report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Jutta HAUG (PES, DE) on behalf of the Committee on Budgets.
The European Parliament adopted the 2009 draft budget substantially higher than that adopted by Council in its July first reading. Commitments are set at EUR 136 billion (1.048 % of GNI), payments are EUR 124.5 billion (equivalent of 0.959% of EU GNI). Council had adopted a draft budget of 133.9 billion in commitments and EUR 114.9 billion in payments. With this vote, Parliament has stayed within the margins of the Financial Perspective.
MEPs deplore the fact that Council has reduced an already low-level PDB even further with a full EUR 1 771 million beneath PDB corresponding to 0.89% of GNI, bringing payments down to an unprecedentedly low level and which has even further increased the disparity between the level of commitments and payments, which is contrary to the principle of equilibrium.
Parliament calls for the ceiling for heading 4 to be adjusted at the first opportunity to correspond to actual needs and deplore the fact that Council is not willing to budget appropriately in this way.
It also supports Letter of amendment No 1 to the PDB 2009 as adopted by the Commission as it seems to give a slightly more realistic picture of needs in heading 4 than the PDB. It regrets, however, that due to the constraints of the MFF 2007 - 2013 it is not in a position to take over new unforeseen and urgent needs such as food aid and the reconstruction needs of Georgia, Kosovo, Afghanistan and Palestine. They underline that it is only recourse to the possibilities provided for by the provisions of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 (IIA) and firm political determination which is an absolute necessity to allow the EU to fulfil its commitments undertaken in the external policy area.
Unrealistic budget : MEPs consider that the figure adopted by Council for payment appropriations is far from being coherent with the various EU political priorities and commitments. They express their astonishment that Council can officially propose a mere 0.89% of GNI in payments, given an overall RAL of already EUR 139 000 million in 2007. In consequence, they decide to increase the overall level of payments.
Supporting EU priorities : MEPs have decided to accept Council's small cuts in the administrative expenditure lines of some multi-annual programmes. However, they stress that these reductions in one annual budgetary procedure must under no circumstances lead to reductions in the overall co-decided envelopes of the programmes concerned. They insist that the Commission compensate for the amounts reduced in later years of the programme period. MEPs consider growth and employment , the fight against climate change and strengthening the safety and security of the European Union's citizens and its social dimension , for instance through the growth for jobs initiative and the support for SMEs and for research and innovation, as well as by supporting cohesion amongst regions, to be important priorities of Budget 2009 and they will reinforce appropriations on budget lines financing these priorities.
MEPs also wish to increase the commitments for aid to projects of common interest in the trans-european energy network (in particular the Nabucco pipeline) with the aim of guaranteeing the EU's gas supplies in the long term. Generally speaking, MEPs are of the opinion that the EU budget in its present format cannot address effectively and realistically the goals that the EU has set for climate change given the fact that the support for climate change measures is still very limited.
Key issues – analysis by budget heading :
On sub-heading 1a – “Competitiveness for Growth and Employment” : MEPs are astonished by Council's additional cuts on lines supporting the Lisbon strategy which is, after all, based on a European Council decision. They point out that the objectives of growth and employment are at the very core of the Lisbon strategy and that the Commission, in its PDB, had already decreased some lines compared to the previous year. MEPs will do its utmost to secure adequate financing for all activities and policies under this heading which can bring direct and tangible advantages for European citizens. They are prepared to use all the available margin to finance pilot projects and preparatory actions in this sub-heading. As regards the European Institute of Technology and Innovation (EIT), MEPs cannot accept the Commission's attempt to reverse the decisions taken by the budgetary authority in the 2008 budget. Therefore, they insist that the budget of the EIT be included in policy area "Research" and that its governing structure, being of an administrative nature, be financed under heading 5.
On sub-heading 1b - “Cohesion for growth and employment” : MEPs underline that this sub-heading finances numerous important policies and activities aimed at fighting climate change and supporting growth for jobs. They regret however, that the PDB has been cut by Council in particular as regards European Social Fund financing devoted to regional competitiveness and employment.
On heading 2 - “Preservation and Management of Natural Resources” : noting that the Commission has claimed that the fight against climate change is one of its priorities for Budget 2009, it considers that this priority is not sufficiently reflected in the PDB. The committee intends, consequently, to put stronger emphasis on this key policy. It proposes, for reasons of visibility, to allocate appropriations in one specific budget line solely for this purpose; will top up resources going to LIFE+ and to the European Rural Development Fund accordingly. MEPs take note of the recent proposals by the Commission on the CAP health check and defend the view that any modulation from the first to the second pillar must remain budgetarily neutral. MEPs note the creation of budget lines for three new funds in the common agricultural and fisheries policy: i) the fund for restructuring in the dairy sector, ii) the Eco-Aid to maintain sheep and goat farming in the EU, iii) the ad-hoc financial instrument – Adaptation of the fishing fleet to the economic consequences of the rise in fuel prices). They consider that these funds should primarily be financed from unused agriculture budget appropriations. MEPs welcome the setting up of the “school fruit scheme”.
On sub-heading 3a - “Freedom, Security and Justice” : MEPs stress the importance of sufficient funding being made available via the EU budget to manage legal immigration and integration of third country nationals while, in parallel, tackling illegal immigration and strengthening border protection, including the strengthening of the European Refugee Fund to facilitate solidarity between the Member States.
On sub-heading 3b - “Citizenship” : MEPs reiterate its disappointment about the low increase compared to 2008. They cannot accept that Council has cut these "citizens' lines" even further, and will make sure that adequate resources are guaranteed in this important area. They point out that it will make use of the small remaining margin in this sub-heading to finance pilot projects and preparatory actions to boost this policy area.
On heading 4 - “EU as a global player” : MEPs note the significant re-shuffling of funds carried out by Council in heading 4 and consider this a strong indication of the serious shortage of resources available under the MFF ceiling. They believe that the funds available do not, as they stand, allow the European Union to assume its role as a global partner. The European Council is called on not to make far-reaching political commitments in which the heads of State and government called for stronger EU financial support to developing countries, or to commit, at the same time, to the necessary budgetary suggestions and actions when there is an obvious contradiction with the funds available under the annual ceilings of the current MFF. MEPs reiterate their assessment of the urgent need for a massive and concrete mobilisation of the European Union to tackle soaring food prices and the resulting food crisis and reiterate the need to respond in a sound budgetary way. They recall that the available margins under heading 2 cannot be spent for heading 4 purposes since the current ceiling of heading 4 does not suffice to finance the instrument without jeopardising existing priorities. It is considered that the two branches of the budgetary authority should make every effort and examine all possibilities provided for in the IIA to finance the amounts foreseen for food aid under heading 4. MEPs continue to count support for the peace process in Palestine and for Kosovo amongst its unchanged key priorities for which sufficient resources have to be entered in the EU budget. They note, however, that such an adequate level of funding might require reprogramming under heading 4, with some budgetary compensation being provided by other budget lines. MEPs support the police mission launched under the European Security and Defence Policy in Kosovo , however, they ask the Commission to provide a concrete plan and timetable for the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX). As regards Georgia, Parliament intends to assist this country and calls on the Commission to present proposals fulfilling the EU's commitments (but contrary to the wishes of the committee responsible, Parliament decided by a small majority not to provide measures for Belarus at this stage). MEPs note in this connection the Commission's intention to consider the provision of up to EUR 500 million in the period from 2008 to 2010 inclusive and, if necessary, pledge these funds in connection with a donor conference for Georgia.
Parliament notes the growing importance of the Energy Community and welcomes Turkey's intention to join it. It is of the opinion that the entry of Ukraine, Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia into the Energy Community should be facilitated and the energy solidarity measures between its members should be developed. The report also points out that the EU priority of combating climate change has also an external component and that relevant activities, such as those in connection with the Global Climate Change Alliance, are to be financed under heading 4.
Lastly, MEPs remind the Council that the Emergency Aid Reserve is supposed to finance unforeseen emergency needs and believes not only that the appropriations on this budget line are justified but also that the deletion of these appropriations would jeopardise the EU's capacity to react properly to a possible crisis situation in the early months of 2009. MEPs therefore restore the PDB for the Emergency Aid Reserve.
On heading 5 - “Administration” : MEPs will, as a general principle, restore Council's cuts of PDB figures in this heading. They point out that in PDB 2009 an overall amount of EUR 1 120 million is budgeted to finance administrative expenditure outside heading 5. MEPs consider this amount quite substantial.
In an amendment adopted in plenary, Parliament underlines the fact that administrative spending continues to rise well above the average EU level of inflation , leading to concerns as to whether taxpayers are getting value for money. It calls on the Commission to launch a fundamental review of all aspects of administrative expenditure reporting on progress since the 2000 reforms, paying particular attention to the impact of the 2004 enlargement and the need to continue the search for efficiency savings. It requests that this review be made available by 31 July 2009 .
MEPs are also concerned about the fact that the amounts taken from operational programme envelopes in order to finance executive agencies are continually increasing and have already reached a substantial level, financing over 1300 staff in 2009. They would like to get a clearer picture of the effects of the creation of executive agencies and the ongoing extensions of their tasks on those parent Directorates General which were responsible for the implementation of the relevant programmes before the executive agencies took over. In addition, MEPs regret the lack of consistency and coherence regularly noticeable in the communication policy implemented by the Commission and they are in favour of the development of a coherent and recognisable "EU identity" to be used in all communication measures.
On pilot projects and preparatory actions : MEPs recall that the IIA allows for a total amount for pilot projects of up to EUR 40 million in any budget year and for a total amount for preparatory actions of up to EUR 100 million. They consider these projects an indispensable tool for Parliament to initiate new policies that are in the interest of European citizens. They have analysed a series of interesting proposals out of which only a small number could be entered into the Budget 2009 due to the constraints of IIA and MFF ceilings. MEPs intend to monitor closely the implementation of these projects and actions under their legal bases during the financial year 2009.
On agencies , Parliament welcomes the Commission's decision to finally follow the requests of the budgetary authority and take assigned revenues into account when drawing up the PDB for the decentralised agencies for 2009. It considers that this is undoubtedly a step towards more budgetary transparency even if the agencies depend to a large extent on revenue generated by fees.
Plenary welcomes the Commission's communication of 11 March 2008, entitled 'European Agencies - The way forward" (COM(2008)0135), noting, in particular, the Commission's commitment to conducting an evaluation of regulatory agencies during 2009. It requests that that evaluation pay particular attention to examining the effectiveness, efficiency and impact of the agencies' work, identifying commensurate efficiency savings within the Commission's own services as work is outsourced to agencies, and that it be completed by 30 June 2009.
The Committee on Budgets adopted the report by Jutta HAUG (PES, DE) on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2009 and Letter of amendment No 1/2009 to the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2009 Section III – Commission.
MEPs deplore the fact that Council has reduced an already low-level PDB even further: commitment appropriations in the draft budget total EUR 133 933 million which represents a decrease relative to PDB of EUR 469 million, and payment appropriations of EUR 114 972 million lie a full EUR 1 771 million beneath PDB corresponding to 0.89% of GNI, bringing payments down to an unprecedentedly low level and which has even further increased the disparity between the level of commitments and payments, which is contrary to the principle of equilibrium.
MEPs call for the ceiling for heading 4 to be adjusted at the first opportunity to correspond to actual needs and deplore the fact that Council is not willing to budget appropriately in this way.
MEPs also support Letter of amendment No 1 to the PDB 2009 as adopted by the Commission as it seems to give a slightly more realistic picture of needs in heading 4 than the PDB. They regret, however, that due to the constraints of the MFF 2007 - 2013 it is not in a position to take over new unforeseen and urgent needs such as food aid and the reconstruction needs of Georgia, Kosovo, Afghanistan and Palestine. They underline that it is only recourse to the possibilities provided for by the provisions of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 (IIA) and firm political determination which is an absolute necessity to allow the EU to fulfil its commitments undertaken in the external policy area.
Unrealistic budget : MEPs consider that the figure adopted by Council for payment appropriations is far from being coherent with the various EU political priorities and commitments. They express their astonishment that Council can officially propose a mere 0.89% of GNI in payments, given an overall RAL of already EUR 139 000 million in 2007. In consequence, they decide to increase the overall level of payments.
Supporting EU priorities : MEPs have decided to accept Council's small cuts in the administrative expenditure lines of some multi-annual programmes. However, they stress that these reductions in one annual budgetary procedure must under no circumstances lead to reductions in the overall co-decided envelopes of the programmes concerned. They insist that the Commission compensate for the amounts reduced in later years of the programme period. MEPs consider growth and employment , the fight against climate change and strengthening the safety and security of the European Union's citizens and its social dimension , for instance through the growth for jobs initiative and the support for SMEs and for research and innovation, as well as by supporting cohesion amongst regions, to be important priorities of Budget 2009 and they will reinforce appropriations on budget lines financing these priorities.
MEPs also wish to increase the commitments for aid to projects of common interest in the trans-european energy network (in particular the Nabucco pipeline) with the aim of guaranteeing the EU's gas supplies in the long term. Generally speaking, MEPs are of the opinion that the EU budget in its present format cannot address effectively and realistically the goals that the EU has set for climate change given the fact that the support for climate change measures is still very limited.
Key issues – analysis by budget heading :
On sub-heading 1a – “Competitiveness for Growth and Employment” : MEPs are astonished by Council's additional cuts on lines supporting the Lisbon strategy which is, after all, based on a European Council decision. They point out that the objectives of growth and employment are at the very core of the Lisbon strategy and that the Commission, in its PDB, had already decreased some lines compared to the previous year. MEPs will do its utmost to secure adequate financing for all activities and policies under this heading which can bring direct and tangible advantages for European citizens. They are prepared to use all the available margin to finance pilot projects and preparatory actions in this sub-heading. As regards the European Institute of Technology and Innovation (EIT), MEPs cannot accept the Commission's attempt to reverse the decisions taken by the budgetary authority in the 2008 budget. Therefore, they insist that the budget of the EIT be included in policy area "Research" and that its governing structure, being of an administrative nature, be financed under heading 5. On sub-heading 1b - “Cohesion for growth and employment” : MEPs underline that this sub-heading finances numerous important policies and activities aimed at fighting climate change and supporting growth for jobs. They regret however, that the PDB has been cut by Council in particular as regards European Social Fund financing devoted to regional competitiveness and employment. On heading 2 - “Preservation and Management of Natural Resources” : noting that the Commission has claimed that the fight against climate change is one of its priorities for Budget 2009, it considers that this priority is not sufficiently reflected in the PDB. The committee intends, consequently, to put stronger emphasis on this key policy. It proposes, for reasons of visibility, to allocate appropriations in one specific budget line solely for this purpose; will top up resources going to LIFE+ and to the European Rural Development Fund accordingly. MEPs take note of the recent proposals by the Commission on the CAP health check and defend the view that any modulation from the first to the second pillar must remain budgetarily neutral. MEPs note the creation of budget lines for three new funds in the common agricultural and fisheries policy: i) the fund for restructuring in the dairy sector, ii) the Eco-Aid to maintain sheep and goat farming in the EU, iii) the ad-hoc financial instrument – Adaptation of the fishing fleet to the economic consequences of the rise in fuel prices). They consider that these funds should primarily be financed from unused agriculture budget appropriations. MEPs welcome the setting up of the “school fruit scheme”. On sub-heading 3a - “Freedom, Security and Justice” : MEPs consider that further funding should be made available via the EU budget to manage legal immigration and integration of third country nationals while, in parallel, tackling illegal immigration and strengthening border protection, including the strengthening of the European Refugee Fund. On sub-heading 3b - “Citizenship” : MEPs reiterate its disappointment about the low increase compared to 2008. They cannot accept that Council has cut these "citizens' lines" even further, and will make sure that adequate resources are guaranteed in this important area. They point out that it will make use of the small remaining margin in this sub-heading to finance pilot projects and preparatory actions to boost this policy area. On heading 4 - “EU as a global player” : MEPs note the significant re-shuffling of funds carried out by Council in heading 4 and consider this a strong indication of the serious shortage of resources available under the MFF ceiling. They believe that the funds available do not, as they stand, allow the European Union to assume its role as a global partner. The European Council is called on not to make far-reaching political commitments in which the heads of State and government called for stronger EU financial support to developing countries, or to commit, at the same time, to the necessary budgetary suggestions and actions when there is an obvious contradiction with the funds available under the annual ceilings of the current MFF. MEPs reiterate their assessment of the urgent need for a massive and concrete mobilisation of the European Union to tackle soaring food prices and the resulting food crisis and reiterate the need to respond in a sound budgetary way. They recall that the available margins under heading 2 cannot be spent for heading 4 purposes since the current ceiling of heading 4 does not suffice to finance the instrument without jeopardising existing priorities. It is considered that the two branches of the budgetary authority should make every effort and examine all possibilities provided for in the IIA to finance the amounts foreseen for food aid under heading 4. MEPs continue to count support for the peace process in Palestine and for Kosovo amongst its unchanged key priorities for which sufficient resources have to be entered in the EU budget. They note, however, that such an adequate level of funding might require reprogramming under heading 4, with some budgetary compensation being provided by other budget lines. MEPs support the police mission launched under the European Security and Defence Policy in Kosovo , however, they ask the Commission to provide a concrete plan and timetable for the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX). Although MEPs underline their will to assist Georgia in its lengthy and costly reconstruction process, they urge the Commission to present proposals fulfilling the EU's commitments, also in the case of Belarus. MEPs insist, therefore, on observance of the politically and financially sound principle of new financing for new needs. They note in this connection the Commission's intention to consider the provision of up to EUR 500 million in the period from 2008 to 2010 inclusive and, if necessary, pledge these funds in connection with a donor conference for Georgia. The report also points out that the EU priority of combating climate change has also an external component and that relevant activities, such as those in connection with the Global Climate Change Alliance, are to be financed under heading 4. Lastly, MEPs remind the Council that the Emergency Aid Reserve is supposed to finance unforeseen emergency needs and believes not only that the appropriations on this budget line are justified but also that the deletion of these appropriations would jeopardise the EU's capacity to react properly to a possible crisis situation in the early months of 2009. MEPs therefore restore the PDB for the Emergency Aid Reserve. On heading 5 - “Administration” : MEPs will, as a general principle, restore Council's cuts of PDB figures in this heading. They point out that in PDB 2009 an overall amount of EUR 1 120 million is budgeted to finance administrative expenditure outside heading 5. MEPs consider this amount quite substantial. MEPs are, in this context, concerned about the fact that the amounts taken from operational programme envelopes in order to finance executive agencies are continually increasing and have already reached a substantial level, financing over 1300 staff in 2009. They would like to get a clearer picture of the effects of the creation of executive agencies and the ongoing extensions of their tasks on those parent Directorates General which were responsible for the implementation of the relevant programmes before the executive agencies took over. In addition, MEPs regret the lack of consistency and coherence regularly noticeable in the communication policy implemented by the Commission and they are in favour of the development of a coherent and recognisable "EU identity" to be used in all communication measures.
On pilot projects and preparatory actions : MEPs recall that the IIA allows for a total amount for pilot projects of up to EUR 40 million in any budget year and for a total amount for preparatory actions of up to EUR 100 million. They consider these projects an indispensable tool for Parliament to initiate new policies that are in the interest of European citizens. They have analysed a series of interesting proposals out of which only a small number could be entered into the Budget 2009 due to the constraints of IIA and MFF ceilings.
MEPs intend to monitor closely the implementation of these projects and actions under their legal bases during the financial year 2009.
PURPOSE: to present the letter of amendment No 1 to the draft general budget of the European Communities for the financial year 2009.
CONTENT: on 15 September 2008 the Commission submitted to the Council letter of amendment No 1 to the preliminary draft budget for 2009.
That letter of amendment concerns expenditure in Section III – Commission – of the general budget, and in particular the following (refer to summary 10/09/2008):
the inclusion of an additional amount, of EUR 40 million in commitment appropriations, to support the stability and development of Kosovo; the inclusion of an additional amount, of EUR 139 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 180 million in payment appropriations, to support the Palestinian authority;
the creation of a new budget article 19 06 06 ("Consular cooperation"); the budgetary adjustments relating to the third extension of the mandate of the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) to Community actions in the TEMPUS and ICI programme fields. The Agency's establishment plan has been amended so that eight temporary agent posts can be added in 2009 for the second extension of the mandate;
the release of the appropriations which were entered in the 2009 PDB following the extension of the Executive Agency for the Public Health Programme and the Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency.
On 2 October 2008, the Council established letter of amendment No 1 to the draft budget for the financial year 2009 on the basis of letter of amendment No 1 to the preliminary draft budget for 2009 as submitted by the Commission .
Accordingly, the commitment appropriations entered in reserve for Articles 19 08 01 02 (EUR 100 million) and 22 02 02 (EUR 60 million) that appeared in the draft budget for 2009 will be deleted.
The margin remaining under the ceiling for Heading 4 amounts to EUR 110 829 640.
PURPOSE: to present Amending Letter No 1 to the Preliminary Draft Amending Budget for 2009 (PDB 2009).
CONTENT: the Amending Letter No 1 (AL 1) to the Preliminary Draft Budget for 2009 (PDB 2009)
covers the following:
the mobilisation of new funds for an amount of EUR 40 million in commitment appropriations to support the stability and development of Kosovo ; the mobilisation of additional funds for an amount of EUR 139 million in commitment and EUR 180 million in payment appropriations to support the Palestinian Authority ; the creation of a new budget article 19 06 06 Consular cooperation (see BUD/2008/2284 ); the budgetary adaptations arising from the extension of the mandate of the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) to Tempus and ICI programmes; the lifting of the reserves entered in the 2009 preliminary draft budget after approval of the extensions of the Executive Agency for the Public Health Programme (PHEA), and the Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency (TEN-T EA).
Remarks on the additional amounts requested by Kosovo and the Palestinian Authority (Heading 4 of the Financial Framework):
1) Kosovo : the Council also expressed its support to the Donors' Conference which was organised by the Commission and took place on the 11th July 2008 and recalled its willingness to assist the economic and political development of Kosovo through a clear European perspective. In response, the Commission pledged EUR 508 million, composed of some EUR 358 million from the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) and a further EUR 150 million in Macro-Financial Assistance (MFA). This pledge is conditional to the Kosovo government's commitment to the sound and efficient management of donated funds and the implementation of agreed policy reforms. It is also subject to sufficient budgetary appropriations being voted by the Budgetary Authority as the European Union pledge currently stands above the current financial programming for Kosovo by EUR 100 million as some EUR 408 million are programmed under IPA and Macro Financial Assistance funding (MFA) over the period 2008/2010. Thus the Commission intends to increase the amounts foreseen for Kosovo in the financial programming by some EUR 100 million to meet the EUR 508 million pledging target. In order to minimize the impact of additional funding for Kosovo on the limited margin foreseen for 2009, the Commission is requesting EUR 40 million as additional front-loaded assistance under the 2009 budget . This amount is to be directed towards development assistance via IPA. The remaining EUR 60 million would stem from internal redeployments within heading 4.
2) Palestine : while the PA pursued its reform programme and donors have provided generous financial contributions, restrictions by the Government of Israel on Palestinian movement and access continue to weigh heavily on the Palestinian economic outlook. Other economic indicators in the occupied Palestinian territory have also deteriorated further. Unemployment stood at nearly 23% in 2007. The deficit of the current budget of the Palestinian Authority is expected to reach USD 766 million in 2008. In view of the current situation and high needs set out above and considering the large deficit of the PA, pressure for external assistance, in particular from the European Union, as the largest donor to the Palestinians, will remain high. In recent years (2008, 2007 and 2006), the amounts allocated initially for the Palestinians were systematically below the actual needs. The Commission had to call on other budget lines within the Community budget to cover the gap. In 2008, the initial allocation of EUR 300 million on the ENPI budget line for Palestine, UNRWA and Peace Process was reinforced to EUR 380 million, to respond to Prime Minister Fayyad’s request to the donor community to fund the increasing deficit for recurrent expenditures. In light of the need to continue a realistic level of funding in 2009, taking account of the state of Palestinian public finances and the need for assistance by the Palestinian Authority government, the Commission proposes to increase the budget line 19 08 01 02 in 2009 by EUR 139 million to reach EUR 300 million . As regards payment appropriations, the amount requested in the PDB (EUR 100 million) should also be reinforced in line with the Commitment appropriations and past execution. An additional EUR 180 million is estimated necessary . The combined additional needs for heading 4 amount to EUR 179 million in commitments, of which EUR 40 million for Kosovo and EUR 139 million for Palestine. This leaves a margin under the ceiling of EUR 64 million for heading 4. The additional payment appropriations are EUR 180 million for Palestine.
It should be noted that the additional amounts do not take account of the facility for rapid response to soaring food prices in developing countries , pending a decision on its legal base (see COD/2008/0149 ) or of the potential assistance to Georgia following the conflict at the end of 2008 which the Council has committed itself.
This document is to be annexed to the draft budget for 2009. in accordance with the agreements on budgetary procedure
As in previous years, this document sets out:
the implementation of the EDFs (7th to 9th) at 31 December 2007; the financial implementation forecasts for the current year (2008); the expenditure forecasts for 2009.
The Member States contribute funds directly to the European Investment Bank (EIB) for the instruments which it manages under the 9th and 10th EDFs (the Investment Facility and interest-rate subsidies). Contributions for other instruments, including contributions for the old instruments managed by the EIB (risk capital and interest-rate subsidies), go to the Commission.
The Commission and the EIB have updated their commitment and payment forecasts for 2008 and 2009 for each of the ACP countries and the Overseas Countries and Territories. The payment forecasts in particular have been compiled with great care with the aim of helping the Member States to assess as accurately as possible the amounts they need to earmark in their national budgets while ensuring that sufficient financial resources are available for the EDF to avoid liquidity problems. In accordance with Article 8 of the Financial Regulation applicable to the 9th EDF and Article 7 of the Internal Agreement on the 10th EDF3, these forecasts will be adjusted in the October 2008 Communication.
The document shows the general trend in commitments and payments, including projections for 2008 (Commission and EIB). It clearly shows the structural upward trend of payments since 2000 .
Implementation of the European Development Funds at 31 December 2007 : the document shows clearly that the Commission has achieved its goal of committing all funds available under the 9th EDF and sums transferred from previous EDFs. In line with the rules, several tens of millions of euro remain to be committed between 1 January 2008 and the entry into force of the 10th EDF.
Implementation of the EDFs in 2007 (commitments, payments and financial situation) : the document gives a breakdown of commitments and payments in 2007 by instrument and compares them with the 2006 figures. It also shows actual implementation in 2007 compared with the forecasts made in October 2007. The Commission was unable to make all the payments forecast owing to insufficient financial contributions by the Member States. However, at EUR 2 920 million payments were once again higher than ever before.
The Commission also presents the financial situation and the projections made in October 2007: for the Commission the cash balance available to the Commission at the end of 2007 was only EUR 57 million (excluding EUR 211 million in 2008 contributions paid in at the end of December 2007). This was the lowest ever cash balance. The EIB's cash balance was EUR 77 million, compared with a forecast of EUR 6 million.
Financial implementation forecasts for 2008 and 2009 : the new forecasts for 2008 put the Commission's needs at EUR 3 000 million and the EIB's at EUR 305 million. These figures are based on the assumption that the 10th EDF comes on stream in early summer 2008. The sums decided by the Council in December 2007 for 2008 are EUR 2 857 million for the Commission and EUR 343 million for the EIB.
Contributions for 2009 are forecast at EUR 3 100 million for the Commission and EUR 370 million for the EIB. It should be stressed that these figures are just a preliminary forecast and must be treated with caution. The Commission and the EIB will make more reliable forecasts after the summer (October 2008).
The Commission urges the Council to make available all the contributions necessary to guarantee proper implementation of the EDF in 2008 and 2009.
The Council unanimously established the draft budget for 2009 at 1 st reading. It used the preliminary draft budget (PDB) of the European Communities for 2009, submitted by the Commission, as the basis for establishing this draft budget.
In keeping with the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and budgetary management (IIA), a conciliation meeting between the Council and a delegation from the European Parliament, with the participation of the Commission, was held on 17 July 2008, prior to the discussions in the Council.
As a result of the Council’s discussions, the PDB as established by the Council amounts to:
§ EUR 133 932.76 million in commitment appropriations (including EUR 89 778.84 million of non-compulsory expenditure);
§ EUR 114 972.33 in payment appropriations (including EUR 70 836.40 million of non-compulsory expenditure).
Under the draft budget for 2009 established by the Council, commitment appropriations increase by 2.8% compared to the 2008 budget and payment appropriations decrease by 4.7%.
The rate of increase in non-compulsory expenditure (NCE) for the draft budget for 2009 is 2.3% in commitments; there is a decrease of 9.4% in payments.
The total payment appropriations provided for in the draft budget for 2009 correspond to 0.89% of Community GNI .
AA. Generally : in establishing the draft budget for 2009, the Council followed a number of guidelines:
due regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and budgetary management; particular care was taken: i) to establish a draft budget that is realistic and comprehensively balanced; ii) not to adopt expenditure relating to the implementation of the Lisbon Treaty; iii) to provide adequate funding for the European Union's various priorities, determining appropriations on the basis of the budget implementation rate in 2007, budget forecast alerts in 2008 and realistic implementation capacities for the programmes (including for executive agencies); iv) to determine the appropriate level of payment appropriations in comparison with 2008, adjusting the amounts on the basis of the 2007 implementation rate and budget forecast alerts in 2008; v) to leave adequate margins below the ceilings for the headings of the Financial Framework, with the exception of subheading 1b, in order to be able to cope with unforeseen situations.
Further principles have been observed as regards the PDB 2009:
the Council decided to retain the nomenclature proposed in the PDB and application of the classification in line with the provisions of Annex III to the Interinstitutional Agreement; activity statements proposed by the Commission covering a wide range of operational policies were analysed in depth. This exercise was conducted with attention to the emergence of a comparative approach within the framework of political families; the Council did not propose any further preparatory actions or pilot projects; to keep the volume of appropriations for the decentralised agencies under control, by taking account of assigned revenue – with the Community contribution to be understood as the amount of subsidy granted in the budget and assigned revenue available – and by applying different uniform criteria linked to those agencies' stage of development: for " agencies which have reached cruising speed ": increase in the Community contribution limited to 2% on the 2008 budget and refusal of the new posts requested; for " agencies which are expanding ": increase in the Community contribution limited to 5% on the 2008 budget and acceptance of 50 % of the new posts requested; for " agencies which are starting up ": increase in the Community contribution limited to 12% on the 2008 budget and acceptance of 75 % of the new posts requested; for an "a gency in a priority sector under the budget guidelines for 2009 ": the Council accepts the appropriations and posts proposed by the Commission in its preliminary draft budget.
B. Expenditure by heading of the financial framework : as to expenditure under the different headings of the Financial Framework the Council decided to:
Heading 1: Sustainable growth :
1.a) as regards competitiveness for growth and employment expenditure: the amount of this heading is set at EUR 11 112 million in commitment appropriations, decreasing by EUR 78.3 million compared to the PDB 2009 as set out by the Commission. This heading is characterised by the following elements:
limit the increase in commitment appropriations requested in the PDB by a total amount of EUR 69.83 million on a number of budget lines of this subheading, based on past and current budget implementation and on realistic implementation capacities for the programmes; limit the change in subsidies for decentralised agencies (-EUR 8.48 million compared to the PDB) and accept a total of 141 new posts for the following agencies: European Medicines Agency; Chemicals Legislation and European Chemicals Agency; European Aviation Safety Agency; European Maritime Safety Agency; European Railway Agency. There being no legal basis, the posts requested for the European Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators were not accepted; set the level of payment appropriations, by making a reduction of a total amount of EUR 471.31 million in the appropriations requested in the PDB in a targeted manner over a series of budget lines, on the basis of an analysis of budget implementation in 2007 and budget forecast alerts in 2008.
The margin available under subheading 1a would be EUR 160.34 million.
1.b) concerning cohesion for growth and employment expenditure: the Council provides EUR 48 414 million , which is the same amount as the PDB. It also reduces the appropriations requested in the PDB by a total of EUR 250 million. That amount represents a reduction in payment appropriations totalling EUR 300 million concentrated on the objective of regional competitiveness and employment under the cohesion policy (EUR 170 million in respect of the European Social Fund and EUR 130 million in respect of the European Regional Development Fund), corresponding to budgeting which takes account of the available information and the realistic prospects for implementation of the programmes in the period from 2007 to 2013, and an increase of EUR 50 million for the convergence objective of the cohesion policy (in respect of the European Regional Development Fund), reflecting the political importance of the development of the States and regions covered by this objective.
The margin available under subheading 1b would be EUR 14.12 million.
Heading 2: Preservation and management of natural resources: the total amount of this heading is EUR 57 144 million, representing EUR 382 million less that the PDB. The Council intends to:
impose a limited reduction totalling EUR 150 million in the commitment and payment appropriations requested in the PDB applied across-the-board to all budget lines of Chapter 05 02 (Interventions in agricultural markets) except those relating to food programmes, free distribution of fruit and vegetables, promotion measures, other plant products/measures, and school milk; reduce by a total of EUR 230 million the commitment and payment appropriations requested in the PDB on the budget line for clearance of accounts; set the level of payment appropriations for rural development, reducing the appropriations requested in the PDB by a total of EUR 115 million on the basis of available information.
This reduction is in line with the overall approach of keeping payment appropriations under control, which it is proposed should cover both compulsory expenditure (heading 2) and non-compulsory expenditure (subheadings 1a and 1b). These amounts estimated on the basis of past budget implementation and available information may be reviewed in the light of the autumn letter of amendment provided for by the Interinstitutional Agreement.
The Council also limits the change in subsidies for decentralised agencies (-EUR 2.11 million compared to the PDB) and accept a total of 5 new temporary posts for the Community Fisheries Control Agency (CFCA).
The margin available under heading 2 would be EUR 2 495.38 million.
Heading 3: Citizenship, freedom, security and justice : the total amount for this heading is EUR 1 448 million in commitments split into 2 sub-headings (representing EUR 20.4 million less than the PDB 2009).
3.a) for freedom, security and justice expenditure: the Council intends to:
limit the increase in commitment appropriations requested in the PDB by a total amount of EUR 4.25 million on a number of specific budget lines of this heading, based on past and current budget implementation and on realistic implementation capacities for the programmes; limit the change in subsidies for decentralised agencies (-EUR 2.15 million compared to the PDB) and accept a total of 39.5 new posts for the: European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Border (Frontex). The appropriations and posts for the Frontex agency were accepted as proposed in the PDB; European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights; European Police College; Eurojust; set the level of payment appropriations by making a reduction of a total amount of EUR 23.73 million in the appropriations requested in the PDB in a targeted manner over a series of budget lines, on the basis of an analysis of budget implementation in 2007 and budget forecast alerts in 2008.
The margin available under subheading 3a would be EUR 39.27 million.
3.b) as regards citizenship expenditure, the Council proposes to:
· limit the increase in commitment appropriations requested in the PDB by a total amount of EUR 6.22 million on a number of specific budget lines of this heading, based on past and current budget implementation and on realistic implementation capacities;
· abandon preparatory action in the field of sport in connection with the implementation of the Treaty of Lisbon;
· limit the change in subsidies for decentralised agencies (-EUR 7.79 million compared to the PDB) and accept a total of 15 new temporary posts for the European Food Safety Authority;
· set the level of payment appropriations by making a reduction of a total amount of EUR 34.24 million in the appropriations requested in the PDB in a targeted manner over a series of budget lines, on the basis of an analysis of budget implementation in 2007 and budget forecast alerts in 2008.
The available margin under subheading 3b would be EUR 36.28 million.
Heading 4: The EU as a global partner : the Council envisages a total amount of EUR 7 554 million in commitments (an increase of EUR 113.738 million from the PDB 2009). It has also been decided to:
· retain an increase in commitment appropriations over and above the PDB by a total amount of EUR 160 million regarding Palestine (+EUR 100 million) and Kosovo (+EUR 60 million), bearing in mind the political importance of the European Union's actions in those geographical areas. These amounts are entered in the reserve and are in anticipation of an amending letter of which the Commission has stated the principle without defining the amounts;
· as a precaution, retain for the CFSP the amounts included in the PDB which are in line with the underlying amounts in the IIA, while bearing in mind that the international situation may change very rapidly in this area;
· limit the increase in commitment appropriations requested in the PDB by a total amount of EUR 44.73 million on a number of specific budget lines of this heading, based on past and current budget implementation and on realistic implementation capacities for the programmes;
· limit the change in subsidies for decentralised agencies (-EUR 1.53 million compared to the PDB);
· set the level of payment appropriations, on the one hand by reducing the appropriations requested in the PDB by an amount of EUR 147.12 million in a targeted manner over a series of budget lines, on the basis of an analysis of budget implementation in 2007 and budget forecast alerts in 2008, and on the other hand by not retaining the amount proposed in the PDB of EUR 244 million regarding the Emergency Aid Reserve.
The margin available under heading 4 would be EUR 129.83 million to cover unforeseen expenditure.
Heading 5: Administration : the Council decided not to adopt the expenditure and posts relating to the implementation of the Lisbon Treaty and to carry out targeted reductions under specific budgetary headings for all the institutions, taking into account the budget outturn in 2007 and real needs. It also intends to apply to some institutions an additional reduction of 1.3% on current expenditure requested for 2009, to take into account efficiency gains and the impact of interinstitutional cooperation (on this point refer to BUD/2008/2026B ). When examining the administrative budgets, the Council also focused on administrative operating expenditure linked to operational programmes and on administrative expenditure by executive agencies. In this respect, it was decided to carry out targeted reductions, in particular on the basis of the 2007 budget outturn. The Council continued its examination of decentralised agencies in the context of the Commission’s intention to launch a thorough evaluation of such agencies.
A margin of EUR 224.13 million is available under heading 5.
Heading 6: Compensations : the Council decided to accept the PDB for this heading (EUR 209.112 million) and to set the margin available under this heading at EUR 0.89 million.
Heading 7: Revenue : the Council decided to accept the PDB subject to the technical adjustments arising from the changes made to expenditure and staff in the draft budget for 2009.
The Council unanimously established the draft budget for 2009 at 1 st reading. It used the preliminary draft budget (PDB) of the European Communities for 2009, submitted by the Commission, as the basis for establishing this draft budget.
In keeping with the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and budgetary management (IIA), a conciliation meeting between the Council and a delegation from the European Parliament, with the participation of the Commission, was held on 17 July 2008, prior to the discussions in the Council.
As a result of the Council’s discussions, the PDB as established by the Council amounts to:
§ EUR 133 932.76 million in commitment appropriations (including EUR 89 778.84 million of non-compulsory expenditure);
§ EUR 114 972.33 in payment appropriations (including EUR 70 836.40 million of non-compulsory expenditure).
Under the draft budget for 2009 established by the Council, commitment appropriations increase by 2.8% compared to the 2008 budget and payment appropriations decrease by 4.7%.
The rate of increase in non-compulsory expenditure (NCE) for the draft budget for 2009 is 2.3% in commitments; there is a decrease of 9.4% in payments.
The total payment appropriations provided for in the draft budget for 2009 correspond to 0.89% of Community GNI .
AA. Generally : in establishing the draft budget for 2009, the Council followed a number of guidelines:
due regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and budgetary management; particular care was taken: i) to establish a draft budget that is realistic and comprehensively balanced; ii) not to adopt expenditure relating to the implementation of the Lisbon Treaty; iii) to provide adequate funding for the European Union's various priorities, determining appropriations on the basis of the budget implementation rate in 2007, budget forecast alerts in 2008 and realistic implementation capacities for the programmes (including for executive agencies); iv) to determine the appropriate level of payment appropriations in comparison with 2008, adjusting the amounts on the basis of the 2007 implementation rate and budget forecast alerts in 2008; v) to leave adequate margins below the ceilings for the headings of the Financial Framework, with the exception of subheading 1b, in order to be able to cope with unforeseen situations.
Further principles have been observed as regards the PDB 2009:
the Council decided to retain the nomenclature proposed in the PDB and application of the classification in line with the provisions of Annex III to the Interinstitutional Agreement; activity statements proposed by the Commission covering a wide range of operational policies were analysed in depth. This exercise was conducted with attention to the emergence of a comparative approach within the framework of political families; the Council did not propose any further preparatory actions or pilot projects; to keep the volume of appropriations for the decentralised agencies under control, by taking account of assigned revenue – with the Community contribution to be understood as the amount of subsidy granted in the budget and assigned revenue available – and by applying different uniform criteria linked to those agencies' stage of development: for " agencies which have reached cruising speed ": increase in the Community contribution limited to 2% on the 2008 budget and refusal of the new posts requested; for " agencies which are expanding ": increase in the Community contribution limited to 5% on the 2008 budget and acceptance of 50 % of the new posts requested; for " agencies which are starting up ": increase in the Community contribution limited to 12% on the 2008 budget and acceptance of 75 % of the new posts requested; for an "a gency in a priority sector under the budget guidelines for 2009 ": the Council accepts the appropriations and posts proposed by the Commission in its preliminary draft budget.
B. Expenditure by heading of the financial framework : as to expenditure under the different headings of the Financial Framework the Council decided to:
Heading 1: Sustainable growth :
1.a) as regards competitiveness for growth and employment expenditure: the amount of this heading is set at EUR 11 112 million in commitment appropriations, decreasing by EUR 78.3 million compared to the PDB 2009 as set out by the Commission. This heading is characterised by the following elements:
limit the increase in commitment appropriations requested in the PDB by a total amount of EUR 69.83 million on a number of budget lines of this subheading, based on past and current budget implementation and on realistic implementation capacities for the programmes; limit the change in subsidies for decentralised agencies (-EUR 8.48 million compared to the PDB) and accept a total of 141 new posts for the following agencies: European Medicines Agency; Chemicals Legislation and European Chemicals Agency; European Aviation Safety Agency; European Maritime Safety Agency; European Railway Agency. There being no legal basis, the posts requested for the European Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators were not accepted; set the level of payment appropriations, by making a reduction of a total amount of EUR 471.31 million in the appropriations requested in the PDB in a targeted manner over a series of budget lines, on the basis of an analysis of budget implementation in 2007 and budget forecast alerts in 2008.
The margin available under subheading 1a would be EUR 160.34 million.
1.b) concerning cohesion for growth and employment expenditure: the Council provides EUR 48 414 million , which is the same amount as the PDB. It also reduces the appropriations requested in the PDB by a total of EUR 250 million. That amount represents a reduction in payment appropriations totalling EUR 300 million concentrated on the objective of regional competitiveness and employment under the cohesion policy (EUR 170 million in respect of the European Social Fund and EUR 130 million in respect of the European Regional Development Fund), corresponding to budgeting which takes account of the available information and the realistic prospects for implementation of the programmes in the period from 2007 to 2013, and an increase of EUR 50 million for the convergence objective of the cohesion policy (in respect of the European Regional Development Fund), reflecting the political importance of the development of the States and regions covered by this objective.
The margin available under subheading 1b would be EUR 14.12 million.
Heading 2: Preservation and management of natural resources: the total amount of this heading is EUR 57 144 million, representing EUR 382 million less that the PDB. The Council intends to:
impose a limited reduction totalling EUR 150 million in the commitment and payment appropriations requested in the PDB applied across-the-board to all budget lines of Chapter 05 02 (Interventions in agricultural markets) except those relating to food programmes, free distribution of fruit and vegetables, promotion measures, other plant products/measures, and school milk; reduce by a total of EUR 230 million the commitment and payment appropriations requested in the PDB on the budget line for clearance of accounts; set the level of payment appropriations for rural development, reducing the appropriations requested in the PDB by a total of EUR 115 million on the basis of available information.
This reduction is in line with the overall approach of keeping payment appropriations under control, which it is proposed should cover both compulsory expenditure (heading 2) and non-compulsory expenditure (subheadings 1a and 1b). These amounts estimated on the basis of past budget implementation and available information may be reviewed in the light of the autumn letter of amendment provided for by the Interinstitutional Agreement.
The Council also limits the change in subsidies for decentralised agencies (-EUR 2.11 million compared to the PDB) and accept a total of 5 new temporary posts for the Community Fisheries Control Agency (CFCA).
The margin available under heading 2 would be EUR 2 495.38 million.
Heading 3: Citizenship, freedom, security and justice : the total amount for this heading is EUR 1 448 million in commitments split into 2 sub-headings (representing EUR 20.4 million less than the PDB 2009).
3.a) for freedom, security and justice expenditure: the Council intends to:
limit the increase in commitment appropriations requested in the PDB by a total amount of EUR 4.25 million on a number of specific budget lines of this heading, based on past and current budget implementation and on realistic implementation capacities for the programmes; limit the change in subsidies for decentralised agencies (-EUR 2.15 million compared to the PDB) and accept a total of 39.5 new posts for the: European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Border (Frontex). The appropriations and posts for the Frontex agency were accepted as proposed in the PDB; European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights; European Police College; Eurojust; set the level of payment appropriations by making a reduction of a total amount of EUR 23.73 million in the appropriations requested in the PDB in a targeted manner over a series of budget lines, on the basis of an analysis of budget implementation in 2007 and budget forecast alerts in 2008.
The margin available under subheading 3a would be EUR 39.27 million.
3.b) as regards citizenship expenditure, the Council proposes to:
· limit the increase in commitment appropriations requested in the PDB by a total amount of EUR 6.22 million on a number of specific budget lines of this heading, based on past and current budget implementation and on realistic implementation capacities;
· abandon preparatory action in the field of sport in connection with the implementation of the Treaty of Lisbon;
· limit the change in subsidies for decentralised agencies (-EUR 7.79 million compared to the PDB) and accept a total of 15 new temporary posts for the European Food Safety Authority;
· set the level of payment appropriations by making a reduction of a total amount of EUR 34.24 million in the appropriations requested in the PDB in a targeted manner over a series of budget lines, on the basis of an analysis of budget implementation in 2007 and budget forecast alerts in 2008.
The available margin under subheading 3b would be EUR 36.28 million.
Heading 4: The EU as a global partner : the Council envisages a total amount of EUR 7 554 million in commitments (an increase of EUR 113.738 million from the PDB 2009). It has also been decided to:
· retain an increase in commitment appropriations over and above the PDB by a total amount of EUR 160 million regarding Palestine (+EUR 100 million) and Kosovo (+EUR 60 million), bearing in mind the political importance of the European Union's actions in those geographical areas. These amounts are entered in the reserve and are in anticipation of an amending letter of which the Commission has stated the principle without defining the amounts;
· as a precaution, retain for the CFSP the amounts included in the PDB which are in line with the underlying amounts in the IIA, while bearing in mind that the international situation may change very rapidly in this area;
· limit the increase in commitment appropriations requested in the PDB by a total amount of EUR 44.73 million on a number of specific budget lines of this heading, based on past and current budget implementation and on realistic implementation capacities for the programmes;
· limit the change in subsidies for decentralised agencies (-EUR 1.53 million compared to the PDB);
· set the level of payment appropriations, on the one hand by reducing the appropriations requested in the PDB by an amount of EUR 147.12 million in a targeted manner over a series of budget lines, on the basis of an analysis of budget implementation in 2007 and budget forecast alerts in 2008, and on the other hand by not retaining the amount proposed in the PDB of EUR 244 million regarding the Emergency Aid Reserve.
The margin available under heading 4 would be EUR 129.83 million to cover unforeseen expenditure.
Heading 5: Administration : the Council decided not to adopt the expenditure and posts relating to the implementation of the Lisbon Treaty and to carry out targeted reductions under specific budgetary headings for all the institutions, taking into account the budget outturn in 2007 and real needs. It also intends to apply to some institutions an additional reduction of 1.3% on current expenditure requested for 2009, to take into account efficiency gains and the impact of interinstitutional cooperation (on this point refer to BUD/2008/2026B ). When examining the administrative budgets, the Council also focused on administrative operating expenditure linked to operational programmes and on administrative expenditure by executive agencies. In this respect, it was decided to carry out targeted reductions, in particular on the basis of the 2007 budget outturn. The Council continued its examination of decentralised agencies in the context of the Commission’s intention to launch a thorough evaluation of such agencies.
A margin of EUR 224.13 million is available under heading 5.
Heading 6: Compensations : the Council decided to accept the PDB for this heading (EUR 209.112 million) and to set the margin available under this heading at EUR 0.89 million.
Heading 7: Revenue : the Council decided to accept the PDB subject to the technical adjustments arising from the changes made to expenditure and staff in the draft budget for 2009.
PURPOSE: to present to present the preliminary draft general budget (PDB) of the European Communities for the financial year 2009 (Section III: Commission).
CONTENT: the Preliminary Draft Budget for 2009 is the expression in financial terms of the European Union’s policies and political priorities.
The Preliminary Draft Budget for 2009 is the third of the multi-annual financial framework for 2007-2013, and the focus is on consistency and consolidation. The Commission’s objectives of prosperity, solidarity, security, and their external projection are maintained, Supporting sustainable growth and fostering an economic climate in which job creation can flourish remains firmly at the top of the agenda. The EU has a leading role to play in combating climate change . Bringing the ‘Energy and Climate Change’ package into the implementation phase will be a priority. Agriculture funds remain stable.
In terms of commitment appropriations , the total for the preliminary draft budget (PDB) 2009 is EUR 134 395 million , corresponding to 1.04% of GNI, or 3.1% more than in 2008. This leaves a margin of EUR 2 638 million under the ceiling. Compulsory expenditure increases by 4.7%, and non-compulsory expenditure increases by 2.4 %.
For payment appropriations , the total amounts to EUR 116 736 million , corresponding to 0.9% of GNI. This is a decrease of 3.3% compared to payments in the 2008 budget, and leaves a margin of EUR 7 444 million under the ceiling. Payments for compulsory expenditure rise by 4.8% on 2008, while those for non-compulsory expenditure fall by 7.6%. This evolution in payments is in line with what is planned in the multiannual financial framework, as the ceiling on payments is declining in 2009. The margin under the ceiling is reduced compared to 2008.
Long-term economic progress and employment remain firmly at the top of European Union spending, taking the biggest share – nearly 45% - of the proposed 2009 budget - a 3% rise on 2008. The second budget priority concerns energy and the environment, with a massive 10% of the budget going on environment . Money for agriculture will remain stable.
All headings in the budget will grow, reaching a total of EUR 134.4 billion in commitments and EUR 116.7 billion in payments.
KEY ASPECTS OF PDB 2009 BY FINANCIAL FRAMEWORK HEADINGS : the following presentation is set out according to the budget headings of the Financial Framework 2007-2013:
Heading 1: Sustainable Growth : this heading covers expenditure for competitiveness and employment as well as cohesion:
§ Heading 1a: Competitiveness for Growth and Employment : c ommitments for sub-heading 1a increase by 5.5% to EUR 11 690 million, leaving a margin of EUR 82 million. Payments also increase by 5.3% to EUR 10 285.2 million. This sub-heading encompasses the key policies in achieving the Lisbon Strategy. The main programmes of this subheading are the 7th Framework Programme for research and technological development (FP7), the Lifelong Learning Programme, the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme (CIP), the Trans-European Networks (TENs), Marco Polo II and GALILEO, and the PROGRESS Programme. Other actions contributing to the goals of competitiveness, sustainable growth and employment are internal market, statistics, the fight against fraud, and taxation and the customs union. Funding for the EU Competitiveness and Innovation Programme (CIP) will grow by 17% and money for employment incentives and improving social inclusion through the PROGRESS programme will rise by 8%. Lifelong learning programmes will grow by 7%, including funding for the new European Institute of Technology.
§ Heading 1b: Cohesion for growth and employment : total commitment appropriations amount to EUR 48 414 million, an increase of 2.5% relative to 2008. The overall payments budget is EUR 34 914 million, a decrease of 13.9% over 2008. Almost EUR 40 billion will go to the structural funds and over EUR 9 billion for the Cohesion Fund. An important development is that spending on structural actions for the EU-12 will grow, hitting the 50% mark - double the share for new members in 2006 and up from 47% in 2008. The 'phasing-in' of new members to regular levels of aid in agriculture will also see overall spending rise, growing by 5%, with the new members receiving 18% of funds – up from 10% in 2006 and up from 16% in 2008.
Heading 2: Preservation and Management of Natural Resources : this increase of 3.5% on 2008 leaves a margin of EUR 2 113 million under the ceiling. Meanwhile, payments rise by 3% to EUR 54 834 million. Within this heading there is an amount foreseen for market related agricultural expenditure and direct aids. In PDB 2009, this amounts to EUR 42 860 million in commitments, and EUR 42 814 million in payments.
The Commission proposes EUR 314.7 million for veterinary and phyto-sanitary measures and EUR 29.5 million for fisheries markets and EUR 13 402 million is for rural development. Furthermore, EUR 941 million is foreseen for fisheries (including the European Fisheries Fund) and EUR 322 million for environment . Support for the EU's main environmental protection programme, Life+, will rise by 8%, reaching EUR 288 million.
Heading 3: Citizenship, Freedom, Security, Justice : this heading is divided into two sub-sections :
§ Heading 3a: Freedom, Security and Justice : this sub-heading sees an increase in commitment appropriations of 15%, rising to EUR 839 million, and maintaining a margin of EUR 32.9 million. Payments also increase by 11.7 % to EUR 596,7 million.
§ Heading 3b: Citizenship : this sub-heading covers issues of key concern to the citizens of Europe, including public health, consumer protection , and civil protection . The crucial task of reaching out to the citizens and communicating Europe also fall within this category, through the funding of cultural programmes and the policy area Communication . Commitment appropriations decrease by 28.8% to EUR 628.7 million, leaving a margin of EUR 22.3 million. Payments for this sub-heading decrease by 31.4% to EUR 669 million. The apparent reduction in appropriations for this heading must be seen in the context of the inclusion in the 2008 budget of EUR 260.4 million for the Solidarity Fund.
Heading 4: the EU as a Global Player : heading 4 s ees an increase in commitments of 1.8% to EUR 7 440 million, with a margin of EUR 243.6 million available under the ceiling. Payment appropriations decrease by 6.6% to EUR 7 579 million. The Instrument for Stability to manage better crises in third world countries levels up to EUR 258 million, an increase of 43%, while programmes to foster democracy and human rights, development cooperation and humanitarian aid continue to rise steadily at around 3.5%.
In 2009 a number of deviations from the 2009 indicative financial programming can be identified: i) the Commission proposes to reinforce the Thematic Programme for Environment and Sustainable Management of Natural Resources including Energy (ENRTP) under the Development Cooperation Instrument for strengthening the Global Climate Change Alliance (GCCA) and the co-financing of public/private partnerships for technology transfer in the area of climate change with an additional EUR 10 million for 2009; ii) a change to the profile of expenditures is proposed for the reinforcement of initiatives for 5 countries in Central Asia by ‘frontloading’ funding over the period 2009-2013; iii) the requirements for provisioning mechanism of the Guarantee Fund for external actions allows for the freeing of EUR 107.54 million.
In line with the priorities of the APS 2009 and taking into account that the nature and the level of the requirements to support the Middle East peace process will depend on developments in the coming months, the Commission intends to revise its requests later during the budgetary procedure as was the case in previous years.
Similarly, additional appropriations related to the settlement of the status of Kosovo might appear to be necessary during the course of the budget procedure.
In addition to these two politically sensitive regions, there have been important developments since 2007 on the world food markets , where export prices of staples have risen significantly. These increases might have an influence on the capacity of the European Union to meet its commitments in terms of Food Aid to developing countries. Therefore a re-assessment of food aid financial needs might also be necessary at a later stage of the budgetary procedure.
The Commission proposes to use the margin of heading 4 primarily to address those outstanding issues.
Heading 5: A dministration : commitments and payments are set at the same level. They increase by 5% to EUR 7 648 million in both cases. The margin amounts to EUR 129.1 million (see also BUD/2008/2026B : 2009 Budget – Other sections).
Heading 6: Compensation : both commitments and payments for budgetary c ompensation to Bulgaria and Romania, 2009 being the last year for such a budgetary compensation, are set at EUR 209.1 million, which is an increase of 1.2% compared to 2008. This leaves a small margin of EUR 0.9 million.
PURPOSE: to present to present the preliminary draft general budget (PDB) of the European Communities for the financial year 2009 (Section III: Commission).
CONTENT: the Preliminary Draft Budget for 2009 is the expression in financial terms of the European Union’s policies and political priorities.
The Preliminary Draft Budget for 2009 is the third of the multi-annual financial framework for 2007-2013, and the focus is on consistency and consolidation. The Commission’s objectives of prosperity, solidarity, security, and their external projection are maintained, Supporting sustainable growth and fostering an economic climate in which job creation can flourish remains firmly at the top of the agenda. The EU has a leading role to play in combating climate change . Bringing the ‘Energy and Climate Change’ package into the implementation phase will be a priority. Agriculture funds remain stable.
In terms of commitment appropriations , the total for the preliminary draft budget (PDB) 2009 is EUR 134 395 million , corresponding to 1.04% of GNI, or 3.1% more than in 2008. This leaves a margin of EUR 2 638 million under the ceiling. Compulsory expenditure increases by 4.7%, and non-compulsory expenditure increases by 2.4 %.
For payment appropriations , the total amounts to EUR 116 736 million , corresponding to 0.9% of GNI. This is a decrease of 3.3% compared to payments in the 2008 budget, and leaves a margin of EUR 7 444 million under the ceiling. Payments for compulsory expenditure rise by 4.8% on 2008, while those for non-compulsory expenditure fall by 7.6%. This evolution in payments is in line with what is planned in the multiannual financial framework, as the ceiling on payments is declining in 2009. The margin under the ceiling is reduced compared to 2008.
Long-term economic progress and employment remain firmly at the top of European Union spending, taking the biggest share – nearly 45% - of the proposed 2009 budget - a 3% rise on 2008. The second budget priority concerns energy and the environment, with a massive 10% of the budget going on environment . Money for agriculture will remain stable.
All headings in the budget will grow, reaching a total of EUR 134.4 billion in commitments and EUR 116.7 billion in payments.
KEY ASPECTS OF PDB 2009 BY FINANCIAL FRAMEWORK HEADINGS : the following presentation is set out according to the budget headings of the Financial Framework 2007-2013:
Heading 1: Sustainable Growth : this heading covers expenditure for competitiveness and employment as well as cohesion:
§ Heading 1a: Competitiveness for Growth and Employment : c ommitments for sub-heading 1a increase by 5.5% to EUR 11 690 million, leaving a margin of EUR 82 million. Payments also increase by 5.3% to EUR 10 285.2 million. This sub-heading encompasses the key policies in achieving the Lisbon Strategy. The main programmes of this subheading are the 7th Framework Programme for research and technological development (FP7), the Lifelong Learning Programme, the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme (CIP), the Trans-European Networks (TENs), Marco Polo II and GALILEO, and the PROGRESS Programme. Other actions contributing to the goals of competitiveness, sustainable growth and employment are internal market, statistics, the fight against fraud, and taxation and the customs union. Funding for the EU Competitiveness and Innovation Programme (CIP) will grow by 17% and money for employment incentives and improving social inclusion through the PROGRESS programme will rise by 8%. Lifelong learning programmes will grow by 7%, including funding for the new European Institute of Technology.
§ Heading 1b: Cohesion for growth and employment : total commitment appropriations amount to EUR 48 414 million, an increase of 2.5% relative to 2008. The overall payments budget is EUR 34 914 million, a decrease of 13.9% over 2008. Almost EUR 40 billion will go to the structural funds and over EUR 9 billion for the Cohesion Fund. An important development is that spending on structural actions for the EU-12 will grow, hitting the 50% mark - double the share for new members in 2006 and up from 47% in 2008. The 'phasing-in' of new members to regular levels of aid in agriculture will also see overall spending rise, growing by 5%, with the new members receiving 18% of funds – up from 10% in 2006 and up from 16% in 2008.
Heading 2: Preservation and Management of Natural Resources : this increase of 3.5% on 2008 leaves a margin of EUR 2 113 million under the ceiling. Meanwhile, payments rise by 3% to EUR 54 834 million. Within this heading there is an amount foreseen for market related agricultural expenditure and direct aids. In PDB 2009, this amounts to EUR 42 860 million in commitments, and EUR 42 814 million in payments.
The Commission proposes EUR 314.7 million for veterinary and phyto-sanitary measures and EUR 29.5 million for fisheries markets and EUR 13 402 million is for rural development. Furthermore, EUR 941 million is foreseen for fisheries (including the European Fisheries Fund) and EUR 322 million for environment . Support for the EU's main environmental protection programme, Life+, will rise by 8%, reaching EUR 288 million.
Heading 3: Citizenship, Freedom, Security, Justice : this heading is divided into two sub-sections :
§ Heading 3a: Freedom, Security and Justice : this sub-heading sees an increase in commitment appropriations of 15%, rising to EUR 839 million, and maintaining a margin of EUR 32.9 million. Payments also increase by 11.7 % to EUR 596,7 million.
§ Heading 3b: Citizenship : this sub-heading covers issues of key concern to the citizens of Europe, including public health, consumer protection , and civil protection . The crucial task of reaching out to the citizens and communicating Europe also fall within this category, through the funding of cultural programmes and the policy area Communication . Commitment appropriations decrease by 28.8% to EUR 628.7 million, leaving a margin of EUR 22.3 million. Payments for this sub-heading decrease by 31.4% to EUR 669 million. The apparent reduction in appropriations for this heading must be seen in the context of the inclusion in the 2008 budget of EUR 260.4 million for the Solidarity Fund.
Heading 4: the EU as a Global Player : heading 4 s ees an increase in commitments of 1.8% to EUR 7 440 million, with a margin of EUR 243.6 million available under the ceiling. Payment appropriations decrease by 6.6% to EUR 7 579 million. The Instrument for Stability to manage better crises in third world countries levels up to EUR 258 million, an increase of 43%, while programmes to foster democracy and human rights, development cooperation and humanitarian aid continue to rise steadily at around 3.5%.
In 2009 a number of deviations from the 2009 indicative financial programming can be identified: i) the Commission proposes to reinforce the Thematic Programme for Environment and Sustainable Management of Natural Resources including Energy (ENRTP) under the Development Cooperation Instrument for strengthening the Global Climate Change Alliance (GCCA) and the co-financing of public/private partnerships for technology transfer in the area of climate change with an additional EUR 10 million for 2009; ii) a change to the profile of expenditures is proposed for the reinforcement of initiatives for 5 countries in Central Asia by ‘frontloading’ funding over the period 2009-2013; iii) the requirements for provisioning mechanism of the Guarantee Fund for external actions allows for the freeing of EUR 107.54 million.
In line with the priorities of the APS 2009 and taking into account that the nature and the level of the requirements to support the Middle East peace process will depend on developments in the coming months, the Commission intends to revise its requests later during the budgetary procedure as was the case in previous years.
Similarly, additional appropriations related to the settlement of the status of Kosovo might appear to be necessary during the course of the budget procedure.
In addition to these two politically sensitive regions, there have been important developments since 2007 on the world food markets , where export prices of staples have risen significantly. These increases might have an influence on the capacity of the European Union to meet its commitments in terms of Food Aid to developing countries. Therefore a re-assessment of food aid financial needs might also be necessary at a later stage of the budgetary procedure.
The Commission proposes to use the margin of heading 4 primarily to address those outstanding issues.
Heading 5: A dministration : commitments and payments are set at the same level. They increase by 5% to EUR 7 648 million in both cases. The margin amounts to EUR 129.1 million (see also BUD/2008/2026B : 2009 Budget – Other sections).
Heading 6: Compensation : both commitments and payments for budgetary c ompensation to Bulgaria and Romania, 2009 being the last year for such a budgetary compensation, are set at EUR 209.1 million, which is an increase of 1.2% compared to 2008. This leaves a small margin of EUR 0.9 million.
In a letter from the European Commission addressed to the Secretary-General of the European Parliament, it notes that, in accordance with Article 272(9) of the EC Treaty, the maximum rate of increase for “non-compulsory” expenditure is set at 5% for the 2009 budget with the current 27 Member States.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Budget 2009/165
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 069 13.03.2009, p. 0001
- Final act published in Official Journal: Corrigendum to final act 32009B0456R(01)
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 157 19.06.2009, p. 0067
- Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading: T6-0622/2008
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 2nd reading: A6-0486/2008
- Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 2nd reading: A6-0486/2008
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE416.388
- Council amended draft budget: 16257/2008
- Amending/supplementary letter on draft budget: 16259/2008
- Amending/supplementary letter on draft budget: 16260/2008
- Council amended draft budget published: 16257/2008
- Committee draft report: PE415.179
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)2707
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0515/2008
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A6-0398/2008
- Budgetary report tabled for plenary: A6-0398/2008
- Committee opinion: PE412.009
- Committee opinion: PE409.800
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE414.117
- Amending/supplementary letter on draft budget: 13702/2008
- Committee draft report: PE412.037
- Committee opinion: PE409.721
- Committee opinion: PE407.741
- Committee opinion: PE409.409
- Committee opinion: PE409.430
- Committee opinion: PE409.466
- Committee opinion: PE409.745
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)2435
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Committee opinion: PE407.755
- Committee opinion: PE407.786
- Committee opinion: PE409.408
- Committee opinion: PE409.469
- Committee opinion: PE409.792
- Committee opinion: PE404.475
- Committee opinion: PE409.464
- Committee opinion: PE409.436
- Document attached to the procedure: 11948/2008
- Council draft budget: 11950/2008
- Council draft budget published: 11950/2008
- Debate in Council: 2866
- Commission preliminary draft budget: EUR-Lex
- Commission preliminary draft budget: COM(2008)0300
- Commission preliminary draft budget published: EUR-Lex
- Commission preliminary draft budget published: COM(2008)0300
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)0534
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)0534 EUR-Lex
- Commission preliminary draft budget: EUR-Lex COM(2008)0300
- Council draft budget: 11950/2008
- Document attached to the procedure: 11948/2008
- Committee opinion: PE409.436
- Committee opinion: PE404.475
- Committee opinion: PE409.464
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)2435 EUR-Lex
- Committee opinion: PE407.755
- Committee opinion: PE407.786
- Committee opinion: PE409.408
- Committee opinion: PE409.469
- Committee opinion: PE409.792
- Committee opinion: PE407.741
- Committee opinion: PE409.409
- Committee opinion: PE409.430
- Committee opinion: PE409.466
- Committee opinion: PE409.745
- Committee opinion: PE409.721
- Committee draft report: PE412.037
- Amending/supplementary letter on draft budget: 13702/2008
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE414.117
- Committee opinion: PE409.800
- Committee opinion: PE412.009
- Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A6-0398/2008
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)2707 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE415.179
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE416.388
- Council amended draft budget: 16257/2008
- Amending/supplementary letter on draft budget: 16259/2008
- Amending/supplementary letter on draft budget: 16260/2008
- Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 2nd reading: A6-0486/2008
Activities
- Jutta HAUG
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Draft general budget 2009 as modified by the Council (all sections) (A6-0486/2008, Jutta Haug/Janusz Lewandowski) (vote)
- 2016/11/22 Draft general budget 2009 as modified by the Council (all sections) (A6-0486/2008, Jutta Haug/Janusz Lewandowski) (vote)
- 2016/11/22 Draft general budget 2009 as modified by the Council (all sections) (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Draft general budget 2009 as modified by the Council (all sections) (debate)
- Martine ROURE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Jean Marie BEAUPUY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Reimer BÖGE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Costas BOTOPOULOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Simon BUSUTTIL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Daniel DĂIANU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Valdis DOMBROVSKIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Brigitte DOUAY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Göran FÄRM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Emanuel Jardim FERNANDES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Vicente Miguel GARCÉS RAMÓN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Salvador GARRIGA POLLEDO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Robert GOEBBELS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nathalie GRIESBECK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pedro GUERREIRO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Catherine GUY-QUINT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gábor HARANGOZÓ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ville ITÄLÄ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anne E. JENSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sergej KOZLÍK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Wiesław Stefan KUC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Patrick LOUIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nils LUNDGREN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marusya LYUBCHEVA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Vladimír MAŇKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Maria MARTENS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Hans-Peter MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean-Claude MARTINEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andreas MÖLZER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jan MULDER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Péter OLAJOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Seán Ó NEACHTAIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zdzisław Zbigniew PODKAŃSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Reinhard RACK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paul RÜBIG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Margaritis SCHINAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Esko SEPPÄNEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marek SIWIEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Søren Bo SØNDERGAARD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- László SURJÁN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- István SZENT-IVÁNYI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jeffrey TITFORD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Kyriacos TRIANTAPHYLLIDES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Helga TRÜPEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Kyösti VIRRANKOSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Rapport Haug A6-0398/2008 - par. 10 #
Rapport Haug A6-0398/2008 - par. 14 #
Rapport Haug A6-0398/2008 - am. 2 #
Rapport Haug A6-0398/2008 - par. 28 #
Rapport Haug A6-0398/2008 - am. 3/rév. #
Rapport Haug A6-0398/2008 - résolution #
Rapport Haug/Lewandowski A6-0486/2008 - ams. 7+9 #
Rapport Haug/Lewandowski A6-0486/2008 - par. 15 #
RapportHaug/Lewandowski A6-0486/2008 - par. 16/1 #
Rapport Haug/Lewandowski A6-0486/2008 - par. 16/2 #
Rapport Haug/Lewandowski A6-0486/2008 - am. 11 #
Rapport Haug/Lewandowski A6-0486/2008 - résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
164 |
2008/2026(BUD)
2008/05/14
AGRI
15 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1a (new) 1a. Notes that currently agriculture and rural development spending combined still represent a substantial part of the EU budget; stresses that the predictability for planning purposes and the reliability of the multiannual financial framework, as decided, must be guaranteed; stresses the need to ensure that the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development is represented by the appropriate committee members in the conciliation committee meetings; stresses also the need to ensure coordination between the Committee on Budgets and specialised committees on budgetary aspects of their legislative activities given their impact on the multiannual financial framework and the annual budgetary procedure;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Underlines the need for a school fruit program and considers the positive impacts of such an activity on public health and nutrition awareness of children; regrets the fact that the Commission has still not tabled a proposal for such a program; calls on the Commission to present its proposal without any further delay and to introduce a new budget line for that purpose in its amending letter;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Underlines the need for a school fruit program and considers the positive impacts of such an activity on public health and nutrition awareness of children; points out that the principle of subsidiarity should be applied so that the regions of the Member States could decide on a voluntary basis to initiate such a program;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Underlines the need for a school fruit program and considers the positive impacts of such an activity on public health and nutrition awareness of children; encourages the Commission to present a proposal as soon as possible;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Reiterates its position on the creation of a milk restructuring fund, which should be used for adapting the milk sector to the new situation - especially in less favoured and sensitive regions - in view of the possible phasing-out of the quota system;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8a (new) 8a. Calls for the elaboration of a pilot project to facilitate an exchange programme between young farmers in developing countries and young farmers in the EU to enable them to gain first- hand understanding of the functioning of their respective markets, of their respective use of technology and their solutions for adapting to climatic conditions;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8b (new) 8b. Urges the Commission and Council to increase the budget for young farmers as this group is facing considerable new challenges (for example combating climate change and maintaining food production in Europe) and has been diminishing for years, for example by strengthening the means for education, training networks and exchange programmes for young farmers or by strengthening the policy tools for young farmers in the Rural Development programme;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that Rural Development is a specific priority foreseen by the Multi- annual Financial Framework; takes note of the
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2a (new) 2a. Notes that there is still an available margin of EUR 2 113 billion under the ceiling of heading 2, proving the success of the reforms of the CAP;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points to the great difficulties regarding the implementation of the EAFRD, regrets that EUR 2 830 million of appropriations remained unspent in 2007, that EUR 1 361 million were carried over to the year 2008 and EUR 1 469 million were reprogrammed to the years 2008-2013 under Point 48 of the Inter-Institutional Agreement, despite the fact that Regulation 1698/2005 was adopted early enough to avoid such procedural shortcomings; voices its concern with regard to the reprogramming of such considerable
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points to the great difficulties regarding the implementation of the EAFRD, regrets that EUR 2.830 million of appropriations remained unspent in 2007, that EUR 1.361 million were carried over to the year 2008 and EUR 1.469 million were reprogrammed to the years 2008-2013 under Point 48 of the Inter-Institutional Agreement, despite the fact that Regulation 1698/2005 was adopted early enough to avoid such procedural shortcomings; voices its concern with regard to the reprogramming of such considerable amounts, which will lead to a significant delay in funds available in the rural regions; calls on the Commission to in
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3a (new) 3a. Is concerned about the difference in commitment and payment levels for Rural Development which was 25% for 2007, 30% for 2008 and a proposed 30% for 2009; requests, therefore, from the Commission a forecast for decommitments for 2009 and for the whole financial period for 2007-2013 and a forecast for the problems with clearing the build-up of overstatements still to be settled (currently the level of RAL∗ under Rural Development is nearly € 9 billion) at the end of the financial period 2007- 2013 since maximum payment levels under annex I of the Inter Institutional Agreement fall from 1.06% GNI in 2007 to 0.94% GNI in 2013;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3a (new) Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out that further modulation foreseen in the Health Check of the CAP, which transfers funds from the EAGF to EAFRD, would increase
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Considers that the pilot projects and preparatory actions currently running (PP/PA) in chapters 5, 6, 7 and 17, which were adopted in the 2008 Budget, are at a very early stage of programming and underlines the need for timely and efficient
source: PE-406.026
2008/07/16
ECON
7 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes the changes in the international economy, which open new opportunities for SMEs at the global level and calls for more SME involvement in international projects through subcontracts concerning activities within their expertise; suggests that preparatory action provide a basis for a European strategy for SME involvement in projects with third countries;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Underlines the necessity for improved efficiency, competitiveness and quality of SME products; in order to meet the needs of SMEs, suggests providing funding for a pilot project leading to the creation of a European centre for digital innovation in industry;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Welcomes the Memorandum of Understanding on Cooperation between the Financial Supervisory Authorities, Central Banks and Finance Ministries of the European Union on Cross-Border Financial Stability; calls for sufficient funding and a full commitment to its implementation at EU level; in this respect, recommends funding a pilot project aimed at identifying a common toolbox of procedures for crisis prevention, management and resolution at EU level;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls for appropriate funding for targeted projects that would facilitate access to finance for SMEs; suggests that a pilot project be promoted for training and coaching SMEs to obtain financing; considers that particular attention should be attributed in this project to the exchange of experience and knowledge between SMEs across Member States;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Notes that an estimated EUR 40 billion are lost every year due to VAT fraud; calls for a pilot project to explore the potential of reducing carousel fraud and other shortcomings in the VAT payment cycle; considers that that pilot project should, in particular, explore the possibility of moving the point of taxation from the invoicing to the settlement stage, using an automated intra-EU VAT- collection system;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses the need for funding to support consumer and SME organisations in better representing their interests by enabling them to hire experts to advise them on the various Commission initiatives and comitology (Lamfalussy level 3 committees) consultations in the area of financial services;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Considers it appropriate to provide budgetary resources for the Lamfalussy level 3 committees (the Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors, the Committee of European Securities Regulators, and the Committee of European Banking Supervisors) with a view to their increasing Community activities and responsibilities;
source: PE-409.647
2008/07/22
PECH
5 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the proposals for the Fisheries and Maritime Policy Budget in 2009, despite the fact that the resources decided on under the Financial Perspective for 2007-2013 are insufficient to meet the needs of the fisheries sector at a time of profound, continued crisis in the fishing industry, characterised by increased costs, particularly for fuel, smaller catches, and lower income;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Invites the Commission to make proposals for urgent measures to help ensure the survival of fishermen and those segments of the European fishing fleet that are most vulnerable, in accordance with this resolution, and looks forward to the outcome of the examination which the Commission has undertaken to carry out concerning a possible ad hoc financing instrument mobilising additional funds for the adaptation of the fleet;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2a (new) 2a. Considers that a pilot project for a market price observatory should be included in the 2009 budget with a view to help analysing the setting of prices throughout the value chain of fisheries products;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4a (new) 4a. Considers that the Commission must provide the necessary technical, logistic and financial aid to enable developing countries to implement the newly-agreed catch certification scheme, as required by Council Regulation (EC) No .../2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing;
source: PE-409.692
2008/07/23
IMCO
3 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Regards the amount foreseen in chapter 17 02 to be appropriate to achieve the goals of consumer policy; agrees with the Commission on the priorities for budget line 17 02 02; supports the idea of financing a Masters degree on consumer policy; considers general measures in the area of consumer literacy a priority, including in the digital environment
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Supports the Commission in its intention to establish a database containing information on consumer trends and the functioning of markets, including price comparison, in particular with a view to feeding into the consumer market scoreboard and market studies; calls, therefore, for the
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Emphasises the need to explore the possibility of introducing a common European standard for mobile phone peripheral devices, as well as measures for achieving this; considers that such standardisation would reduce costs and facilitate consumers' use of mobile telecommunication services, as well as reduce waste of electrical and electronic equipment and save energy, materials, and resources; calls, therefore, for a study on the development of a common European standard for mobile phone peripheral devices.
source: PE-409.723
2008/07/24
CULT
1 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Suggestion 7 7. requests that the Commission reflect on the possibility of creating a specific budget for the implementation of the Unesco Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions to which the EU is a party, more specifically, creating a budget in order to contribute to the International Fund for Cultural Diversity, established by Article 18 of the Convention, as the Member States already have.
source: PE-409.743
2008/08/04
INTA
6 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that new Aid for Trade money should be additional to existing development aid and new Aid for Trade pledges should not lead to the shifting of resources already earmarked for other development initiatives;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Expresses its concern regarding the lack of clarity on the way Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) will be financed; calls on the Commission to provide detailed information regarding what financial assistance it will provide to ACP countries to adapt to the economic changes following the signing of EPAs;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Reiterates the request made to the Commission to assess progress made in implementing the measures taken in the Aid for Trade area and to submit to Parliament and Council a bi-annual report (starting in 2009) on implementation and results obtained and, as far as possible, on the main outcomes and effects of Aid for Trade assistance;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Requests explicitly that the bi-annual report contain specific information on the history of the measures financed, where appropriate showing the results of monitoring and evaluation exercises, the involvement of the relevant partners, and the implementation of the pledges and budget commitments and payments, broken down by country, region and category of assistance; requests that the report also assess progress made in mainstreaming trade into aid programming and the results achieved with the assistance, using, as far as possible, specific and measurable indicators of its role in meeting the Aid for Trade objectives;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Calls on the Commission to present, in advance of Parliament's second reading, a short document providing a total figure for all Aid for Trade finance coming from the EU budget, and a total figure from the total amount of Aid for Trade for all "trade-related assistance" provided;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission to submit to Parliament as soon as possible a proposal for establishing the planned European Business Centre in China; stresses that the submission of a proposal is a precondition for the decision on making available the necessary funds; calls for the duplication of structures to be avoided when the European Business Centre in China is established and for activity to be restricted to the identification and dissemination of information for SMEs in particular;
source: PE-409.782
2008/08/19
REGI
5 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Expresses concern at the considerable reduction in structural fund payment appropriations compared with 2008, and looks to the Commission to carry out a fresh analysis of the basic situation;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on a Commission to undertake a pilot project to promote learning of the languages of neighbouring countries and form networks for cooperation and best- practice exchange with a view to enhancing mutual understanding and communication between regions; recommends that the project's aim should be to support the studying of neighbouring regions' languages on a reciprocal basis and to set up a platform for best-practice exchange and inter- regional cooperation.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission to implement a Eurodistrict pilot project to establish an integrated administrative level going beyond the bounds of mere cross-border cooperation as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on a European grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC)1; points out that the aim of this pilot project is to devise a legal basis establishing an integrated representative association of cross-border local and regional authorities, with autonomous decision- taking powers, in the following areas: transport, economic development, tax policy harmonisation, the environment, waste, tourism, culture, recreational activities, social policy, health, bilingual education and vocational training, and security; _______ 1 OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p. 19.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission to undertake a pilot project to promote knowledge of, and experience from, EU Regional Policy in third countries through the organisation of international events, network building between regional and local stakeholders, development of joint projects and new regional partnerships, as well as the exchange of good practices; considers that such a pilot project would be instrumental in promoting EU values and cohesion policies through these regional dialogues; recommends that the Commission cooperate with the Forum of Global Associations of Regions (FOGAR) and the United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG), in order to secure complementarities and synergies between their respective actions in this field;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission to implement a pilot project to set up an Erasmus programme for local elected representatives to contribute to exchanges of good practice in the area of governance and thereby set in motion a process of continuous learning aimed at all the individuals involved, in particular regional and local elected representatives; recommends, in this connection, that regional and urban policies be brought under an integrated development strategy, which is contingent on improved governance;
source: PE-409.803
2008/08/20
JURI
1 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Draws attention to the Action Plan on European Contract Law and to the Interim Outline Edition of the academic Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR); recalls that, at the end of 2008, the study groups will present the final version of the DCFR, for use by the European institutions as a foundation for creating European contract law, and stresses that at that point it will be important for the DCFR to be available in as many official languages as possible in order to facilitate thorough debate by politicians, legal experts and other interested parties concerning the future of European contract law on the basis of the DCFR;
source: PE-411.939
2008/08/21
EMPL
10 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Commission, in view of the imminent review of the Financial Regulation1 to analyse the effects of the degressivity clause; _______________________ 1 Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1)
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Proposes a pilot project aimed at training those who work with children with disabilities, in order to promote a better awareness of disability issues and to combat discrimination; furthermore, suggests that future projects retrain those individuals currently working in large scale institutions so as to equip them for work in new community-based services.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the fact that, by way of preparation for European Year for Combating Poverty and Social Exclusion
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2α Calls for the effective use of the amount of € 130 000 earmarked for the administrative organisation of the Community Progress programme to fully implement the European Employment Strategy and promote social solidarity, protection and cohesion;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that the annual 1% reduction in funds (degressivity principle) is increasingly hindering the trade union institutes ETUI-REHS and EZA from carrying out European projects because of the generally low equity ratios of their member organisations in the new Member States;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14α. Approves the projected allocation of € 953 363 000 to promote the lifelong learning programme and hopes that the funds will be allocated equitably for lifelong learning, adult retraining and teacher training, in accordance with the principle of non-discrimination and equal opportunities for all, so as to assist those belonging to the most vulnerable categories or resident in less-favoured areas of the EU;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 15. Proposes a pilot project on the issue of violence against the elderly so as to investigate the extent and causes of physical and psychological violence against elderly people, a
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 16. Proposes a pilot project on the employment and living conditions of posted workers, given the continuing lack of reliable data on this; states that investigations should focus on th
source: PE-409.802
2008/08/27
AFET
13 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Reiterates that
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Welcomes the Commission's proposal, in the interests of public health and particularly the health of children and young people, to establish an EU school fruit programme in order to improve the dietary habits and thus the health of young EU citizens, as already described in the White Paper of 30 May 2007 on 'A Strategy for Europe on Nutrition, Overweight and Obesity related health issues' (COM(2007)0279); calls in this connection for the programme only to promote measures with the aim of distributing fresh products, while excluding ready-made fruit products or fruit preparations from this package of measures so that the change in dietary habits from ready-made to fresh products can achieve its full impact;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Welcomes the fact that the funding allocated to regional policy is increased in the 2009 budget;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers it necessary to set up a crisis management and reconstruction fund for the heavily damaged conflict areas in Georgia in order to provide humanitarian aid, facilitate the return of refugees and the reconstruction of homes and critical infrastructure, and offer instruments to mitigate the negative impacts of the conflict on the economy of Georgia;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 b (new) 12b. Draws attention to the fact that, although expenditure on regional policy objectives has increased, there have nonetheless been reductions in the funding allocated within the European Regional Development Fund to regional competitiveness and employment and to European Territorial Cooperation and that both fields are very important for the 12 new Member States, and recommends therefore that the above-mentioned allocations should at the minimum remain at the 2008 level in such a way that the amount for 2009 keeps pace with annual inflation;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Welcomes the humanitarian aid allocated by the Commission immediately after the outbreak of the Georgia crisis, which is needed in order to alleviate the suffering of conflict-affected people in Georgia and of refugees who have fled to the Russian Federation; insists that the current amounts under Heading 4 do not allow for the provision of reconstruction assistance to the conflict-affected areas of Georgia, and therefore asks the Council to allocate additional means to that end; at the same time, asks the Commission to analyse the needs in respect of reconstruction assistance and to keep Parliament continuously informed so as to ensure the accountability of any steps to be taken in this regard; insists that international donors are to be strongly involved in carrying out the reconstruction of Georgia;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 c (new) 12c. Hopes that the budget allocation for the European Solidarity Fund, which has not yet been decided, will not decrease, but on the contrary, particularly in the light of the number of natural disasters, which has grown in recent years, be increased;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Having regard to the growing political importance of election observation and the fact that it is not possible to forecast the annual cost thereof, in particular because of the increase in security-related costs, calls for greater flexibility under the EIDHR so that annual funding requirements can be met;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Recognises that the risks associated with the implementation of the policy options chosen under the EIDHR, namely as regards giving support to civil society organisations and/or human rights defenders in countries and regions where fundamental freedoms are most at risk, are greater than those normally identified in relation to other policy options; points out that this is linked to the innovative and political requirements to which implementation gives rise, including the provision of support to organisations that do not have legal personality and grants made through umbrella organisations, in line with the provisions of the Financial Regulation;
source: PE-412.010
2008/08/29
FEMM
12 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Urges the Commission to increase efforts in order to make more rapid progress towards the general implementation of principle of gender
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 d (new) 3d. Calls for the budget lines related to the development of policies in favour of 'DYS' (dysphasia, dyspraxia, dyslexia, dyscalculia or attention deficit disorder, etc.) and disabled persons to be maintained, especially regarding an improved support towards women and men whose children suffer from disabilities and 'DYS' disorders, as well as towards the transition of DYS and disabled individuals from school to professional integration;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 e (new) 3e. Recognises the need to support those persons affected by 'DYS' disabilities and disorders from their childhood to their social and professional integration; considers that the current support provided by the Community and the Member States to persons taking care of DYS individuals is not sufficient, while the responsibility is taken more often by women than by men; calls for appropriate action in order to ensure that women and men taking care of DYS individuals benefit from equal opportunities and supports the pilot project aiming at implementing financing in order to guarantee the promotion of better support for the educators and parents of DYS individuals respecting equal opportunities between women and men;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Regrets that the communications budget is lacking instruments enabling DG Communication to apply the general gender budgeting approach; stresses the importance and the role of the EU Communication policy in raising awareness about gender issues and calls for appropriate financial means to be found for this kind of action.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Urges the Commission to increase efforts in order to make more rapid progress towards the general implementation of principle of gender budgeting as essential means in promoting equality between men and women; welcomes the Commission's willingness to systematically apply gender mainstreaming in the budgetary process,
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 – indent 1 – Points out that, although for 2009 the commitments for Section 5 "Equality between women and men" of the PROGRESS programme (item 04 04 01 05) have reached 12 % level, overall commitments and payments for the period 2007-2009 are between 11.1 % and 11.2 %, falling short of 12 % allocation to Section 5; moreover, total appropriations for the PROGRESS programme are below average multi-annual level; therefore urges the Commission to bring those figures
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 – indent 2 – Observes that the Daphne III programme (Fight against violence, item 18 04 07) has not taken full advantage of the increase in its budget, therefore urges the Commission to increase commitment levels in line with the average level foreseen in the multi-
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 – indent 2 a (new) – Invites the Commission to urge Member States to increase the use of Structural Funds, in the framework of the European Social Fund, as a means of promoting equality between men and women;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Deplores the Commission's
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Underlines the added value of pilot projects launched by associations that promote equal opportunities between men and women; calls, hence, for further attention to avoid the creation of monopolies and abuse of a dominant position in the framework of the execution of the budget of pilot projects so that access to the Community budgetary lines is not hindered for associations active in local networks;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Calls for a more balanced distribution of the budget lines in order to avoid budgetary monopolies; underlines that numerous associations at a European level are efficient in promoting equal opportunities between men and women; therefore calls for the budget lines related to associations promoting equality between men and women at a European level to be merged so as to ensure that the budget is fairly accessible to all associations;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Calls for the launch of pilot projects in the following fields: solidarity between generations, and especially carers, the input of men in the education of children and the reconciliation between family life and professional life, the acknowledgement of the informal labour of women within the framework of intergenerational networks in order to highlight the economic value of women's informal work;
source: PE-411.972
2008/09/02
LIBE
4 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Members States to establish a common Schengen visa internet site in order to further support the application of the common visa policy; this internet site should also support the handling of the visa procedure;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Recalls that in its resolution of 18 June 2008 on Missing Persons in Cyprus1 Parliament supported the allocation of further financial support to the Committee on Missing Persons (CMP) for the years 2009 onwards; calls on the Council to agree to this further financial assistance
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Requests the Commission to include in the Community actions section of the 2009 work programmes of the European Refugee Fund and of the Return Fund the compilation of data for collaboration and exchange of best practices among the educators of minors in Closed Detention Centres for asylum seekers and immigrants;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Requests the Commission to make use of the additional amounts granted to the European Refugee Fund in order to identify and to promote specific measures needed to intensify the resettlement activities; also calls on the Member States to implement the specific priorities linked to resettlement activities with the additional appropriation granted.
source: PE-412.046
2008/09/16
AGRI
13 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Commission to present a legislative proposal for increasing the EAFRD contribution for rural development projects to 85 % of the eligible public expenditure in the regions eligible under the convergence objective, and to 75 % of the eligible public expenditure in the other regions in order to facilitate the payments for measures that are urgently needed for the economic development of the regions;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Considers that the Sugar Restructuring Fund should be used only for measures which demonstrably contribute to diversification of the rural economy and which improve environmental conditions and employment opportunities;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Council and the Commission to implement a more refined system of performance indicators for farming systems and production methods in rural development measures so as to respond to the challenges related to climate change, water protection, biodiversity and renewable energies;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls for a pilot project for assessing the costs for farmers which stem from compliance with EU standards in the fields of the environment, animal welfare and food safety, as well as the costs for farmers associated with the provision of public goods such as landscape preservation through farming activities;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Calls for a significant increase in appropriations for the school fruit scheme;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that the primary goal of the CAP is to guarantee market stabilisation, supply security and reasonable prices for consumers and therefore calls on the Council and the Commission to foresee for budget 2009 the necessary means to face the new needs arising from the current food crisis, especially an improvement of access to food for the most deprived people who are suffering the most from this crisis, and in order to support as a matter of urgency industries that are in difficulty such as sheep farming, cattle breeding and suckler farming, which are concentrated in the most disadvantaged areas;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Points to the importance of setting up and strengthening European programmes directed towards good nutrition, such as the school milk and school fruit scheme;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Recalls its resolution of 19 June 2008 on the future of the sheep/lamb and goat sector in Europe1, in which it calls on the Council and the Commission to direct additional financial support as a matter of urgency to EU sheep and goat meat and milk producers in order to develop a vibrant, self-sufficient, market-led and consumer-orientated sheep and goat sector in the EU; _______ 1 Texts adopted of that date: P6_TA(2008)0310.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Considers that the Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) must be respected when creating a rapid response facility for responding to soaring food prices in developing countries; insists that the establishment of such facility necessitates amendment of the IIA, transferring unspent amounts from Heading 2 to Heading 4; underlines that such amendment of the IIA can be achieved in a timely manner if there is a consensus between the institutions; is concerned about the significant price increase for fertilisers and expects that the planned purchase of fertilisers using funds from the above-mentioned facility will amplify this trend;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Stresses the importance of transparency in production and distribution chains in the agriculture and food sectors, and calls on the Commission to set up a monitoring system for these;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Encourages the Commission to establish, within the framework of the EARFD and in accordance with the EU commitments under the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, a European open data and pooling bank for traditional plant varieties which will enable non- governmental organisations and private and public-sector bodies to set up, alongside Member States’ national gene banks, a seed pool for traditional plant varieties which are particularly valuable for preserving biodiversity in agriculture and for producing quality foodstuffs;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Points once again to its position in favour of creating a restructuring fund for milk, with the aim of enabling the sector to adjust to the new situation, against the background of the possible abolition of the quota system - particularly in disadvantaged and sensitive regions;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Emphasises that, in accordance with the Territorial Agenda adopted by the European Council in May 2007, more efforts need to be made to achieve sustainable urban and rural development and territorial cohesion; points out, therefore, that projects that seek to implement an integrated rural/urban structural policy which focuses on sustainable resource management, documentation and dissemination of good practice in energy efficiency, waste recycling, short-distance quality food supply, and sustainable suburban traffic systems etc., inter alia through good public private partnerships, need to be provided with additional funding;
source: PE-412.219
2008/09/22
DEVE
2 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.Welcomes the proposal of the Commission for a regulation establishing a facility for rapid response to soaring food prices in developing countries1, as a timely response to the real hardship caused by soaring food prices for the world’s poorest population and aimed at promptly increasing agricultural productivity; calls for the necessary funding to be made available, while safeguarding compliance with the rules of the budgetary procedure laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement2
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) source: PE-412.247
2008/10/06
BUDG
30 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas a conciliation meeting between these delegations took place on
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Stresses that significant developments aimed at assisting Members in the exercise of their mandate, particularly their legislative duties, have been achieved; points to the positive evaluation of the first phase of a new analytical briefing service in the library and, also, the positive appraisal for further development of a fully fledged knowledge management system;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Underlines the positive results of the Conciliation meeting between the Bureau and the Budgets Committee on 30 September 2008 and the constructive nature of this meeting; can, based on its previous resolutions and further analysis of the Estimates and Amending Letter, largely endorse the modifications to the Establishment Plan proposed by the Bureau; is not in a position, however, to fully approve all proposals and has therefore decided to maintain a limited number of posts in reserve pending clarifications;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recognises that significant efforts of redeployment have been and will be made in order to limit staff increases and related costs; stresses, nevertheless, that the Bureau and the Administration will need to keep a consistent focus on this issue
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recognises that significant efforts of redeployment have been made in order to limit staff increases and related costs; stresses, nevertheless, that the overall effectiveness of the use of human resources towards the fulfilment of specific tasks should also be considered. Also, the Bureau and the Administration will need to keep a consistent focus on th
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Is satisfied that the current proposals will contribute positively to enhancing the Parliament's law-making capacities, including with regard to the issue of comitology, as also presented in a recent report, for follow-up, to its Budgets Committee, but still considers it necessary to focus scarce resources even more towards areas directly linked to Members' work in parliamentary committees and legislation; has therefore decided to maintain a 10% share of the additional posts requested, and related appropriations, in the reserve;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Wishes to ensure that sufficient appropriations are available to provide for the adequate participation, with the necessary infrastructure, of its delegations in all meetings including activities in relation to the WTO;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 b (new) 12b. While being fully committed to a speedy launch of the Visitor's Centre, stresses that, following the Conciliation, some further work is still needed to arrive at a satisfactory and cost-effective solution; notes that the two delegations could not reach full agreement on this point and, in consequence, decides to partially approve the requests at this stage, while being fully prepared to revisit this issue as soon as possible and after the necessary information has been provided;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Approves the changes to the Establishment Plan of the secretariat as contained in the tabled budgetary amendments, totalling _XX posts and __ upgradings; maintains in reserve the appropriations related to a limited number of posts pending further analysis
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Points out that it has decided to provide significant additional amounts, in the region of EUR 6,5 million, in order to boost information activities carried out in the Member States as part of its strategy and action plan for the 2009 European elections;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Stresses that the budgetary provisions have now been put in place in order to facilitate the introduction of a new "Regime" for Members' parliamentary assistants and warmly welcomes the work currently being done in order to reach a final agreement on this issue before the end of the year;
Amendment 2 #
1. Considers that the EU institutions, following its request that they present
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Welcomes the establishment of a new Library Briefing Service, which will enhance Members' parliamentary activities; stresses the importance of Members being able to receive timely, objective and factual information on subjects relevant to their parliamentary activities; asks the administration to further improve the presentation of the answers to MEPs enquiries, publish all requests, and not only the Briefings, on the Library's web site and enlarge the linguistic coverage of the information provided; wishes to be informed by way of a first evaluation at the beginning of 2010;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Welcomes the proposal for a Knowledge Management System to improve the dissemination of information and to manage the various information sources at administrative and political level; asks the administration to present the results of the first phase of the two- step approach by the end of March 2009;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 c (new) 14c. Considers that daily allowances for Members of the European Parliament for Fridays following plenary part-sessions in Strasbourg should be abolished, and asks the Bureau to act accordingly.
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Given the very substantial amounts involved,
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Recalls that a clearer medium to long-term vision for buildings, including planning measures, would likely be beneficial for controlling costs; calls on its Bureau to continue efforts in this regard; asks to receive a final report on the financial, administrative and legal implications related to the issue of asbestos and, as well, to the ceiling repair works necessary in Strasbourg;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Does not agree to an increase in expenditure for Parliament's vehicles until a decision has been taken on the purchase of less polluting cars;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 b (new) 15b. Reiterates that Plenary has decided that as from the entry into force of the Members' Statute, it should no longer be possible to acquire new rights under the Voluntary Pension Scheme; points out that the implementing decisions, as decided by the Bureau, permit the acquiring of new rights only for members of the Fund that are re-elected, who will fall under a transitional arrangement and who are not entitled to a national or European pension linked to their mandate; believes, consequently, that there will be hardly any Members still eligible to acquire new rights; has decided therefore to decrease appropriations even further, entering only credits linked to the period of the current mandate;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 c (new) 15c. Awaits the results of the study on the carbon footprint of the European Parliament, which should also include the question of CO2 off-setting schemes, as requested by Parliament; has decided to adapt the nomenclature of the lines affected by such an eventual future off- setting scheme; reiterates, however, that efforts need to be stepped up to reduce travel where possible;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 d (new) 15d. Expresses its wish that a mobility management centre, detailing public transport connections from and to the Parliament, will be available throughout Parliament's premises, as well as via the intranet, as from the start of the new mandate of Parliament, encouraging use of public transport as an alternative to car use;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. In view of the coming European elections, welcomes the idea of greater involvement of young people in the campaign process, with the aim of informing EU citizens about the role of the European Parliament; recommends that projects like 'The Union Square' be supported from budget line S1-3249 of Parliament's budget;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that, overall, there is still room for improvement and more effective use of
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Decides to fix the general abatement rate at 3
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses once again the importance of continuous parliamentary monitoring of the implementation of budgetary decisions, which is the base for the establishment of the annual budget; is convinced that direct parliamentary control can only contribute to the improvement of the quality of spending, to a more direct control of sound financial management and eventually to a re- focusing of financial support to political priorities; believes that this objective can be reached only with the full involvement of the two budgetary committees and specialised committees; asks the Conference of Committee Chairs to make concrete proposals to set up specialised monitoring groups on areas of major interest, allowing these monitoring groups the use of budgetary expertise;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that Parliament should not use its financial resources for political persuasion and one-sided information campaigns during the upcoming European election campaigns;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Welcomes the decision not to increase the funding of European political parties and political foundations as proposed by the Committee on Constitutional Affairs; notes that there is, however, a mid-term plan to increase this financing again after the election year;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Warmly welcomes the improved cooperation between the Bureau and the Committee on Budgets which has provided
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers nevertheless, that some practical difficulties will have to be ironed out in order to facilitate and further improve cooperation
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Acknowledges that significant developments, with a clear budgetary impact, have occurred since its adoption of the Estimates and that, in consequence, certain adjustments are now called for;
source: PE-413.987
2008/11/27
BUDG
37 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. On overall figures, sets the final level of commitment appropriations at EUR xxx xxx million; sets the overall level of payments at EUR 116 096 million, equivalent to 0,89% of EU GNI ; notes that this leaves a significant margin of EUR 7 762 million beneath the payments ceiling of the multi-annual financial framework (MFF) for 2009; underlines the joint commitment of both arms of the budgetary authority to a prompt provision of additional payment appropriations, particularly in the event of structural policies being more quickly implemented during the budgetary year;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Undertakes to analyse the related budgetary implications of the Commission's proposal for a European recovery plan; reiterates the commitment of Parliament and of the Council, as stated at the conciliation meeting, to respond with the appropriate financial means to the current economic crisis;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Attaches crucial importance, therefore, to the ready availability of higher payment appropriations through amending budgets, if those entered in Budget 2009 should prove insufficient, and highlights the commitments made in respect of this by the three institutions in the relevant joint declaration as agreed in the conciliation meeting; asks the Commission to further clarify its intentions in relation to this, following the publication of the European Economic Recovery Plan on 26 November 2008;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Underlines the vital importance of effective budget implementation and of reducing unpaid commitments in light of this very modest overall level of payments; calls on the Commission and on Member States to do their utmost to implement, in particular, lines in heading 1b of the MFF, because this sub-heading not only finances numerous important policies and activities aimed at tackling climate change but also supports growth for jobs initiatives contributing to economic growth; stresses that improvement and simplification measures are needed in order to accelerate the implementation of structural and cohesion funds and invites the Commission, within the existing legal framework, to proceed rapidly with its compliance assessments of the Member States' management and control systems in order to facilitate the start of major projects; notes with great concern that the Commission has, on the basis of evidence, seen fit to cut EUR 220 million of funding for Bulgaria; asks the Commission to support both Bulgaria and Romania in their reforms and to report every three months to the Parliament on problems or irregularities in implementing EU funds;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Underlines the vital importance of effective budget implementation and of reducing unpaid commitments in light of this very modest overall level of payments;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Insists that the Commission take the appropriate measures both at political and administrative level to undertake a concrete follow-up to the joint declaration No 3 on implementation of cohesion policy, as adopted at the conciliation meeting on 21 November 2008; undertakes to evaluate before the end of March 2009 whether sufficient progress has been made;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Welcomes the agreement on the EUR 1 billion financing over three years for the Food Facility, reached in the conciliation meeting; notes that a share of EUR 420 million will be financed by fresh money via the flexibility instrument, while EUR 340 million will come from the Emergency Aid Reserve,
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Reiterates its conviction that climate change measures are still not satisfactorily included in the EU budget and will support all efforts to increase and concentrate adequate financial resources to boost European leadership in dealing with the consequences of climate change;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Emphasises that Budget 2009 reinforces the safety and security of EU citizens by bolstering related actions and policies which concern mainly competitiveness, small and medium enterprises (SMEs), transport and energy security as well as securing external borders;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Has taken note of the Commission's Letter of Executability regarding the amendments to the draft budget adopted by Parliament at first reading; considers it unacceptable that the Commission presented this document at such a late stage in the procedure, thus rendering it far less useful than it could have been; insists that several important political issues require appropriate visibility in the Union's budget; decides to create new budgetary lines on climate change, on the Small Business Act (SBA),on the financial instrument for the adaptation of the fishing fleet to the economic consequences of fuel prices and on aid for rehabilitation and reconstruction of Georgia; has decided to take some of the Commission's comments into account in the second reading of the budget; will, however, abide by its first reading decisions especially in those cases in which sufficient time and effort has already been spent at an earlier stage on assessing how Parliament's amendments can best be implemented, as was the case with pilot projects and preparatory actions;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.Welcomes the overall agreement on Budget 2009, reached in the traditional budgetary conciliation meeting with Council on 21 November 2008, especially with regard to the financing of the Food Facility; is extremely concerned, however, about the possible effects of a recession on European citizens and regrets, therefore, that at the conciliation meeting, the Commission was reluctant to disclose any information on the possible budgetary impact of its coming proposal on tackling
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Reminds the Member States of their obligations with regard to national management declarations under Point 44 of the IIA; reminds the Commission also of its responsibilities in that context, especially with regard to the political support it pledged to give to the initiative, but which has so far not materialised;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Deplores the fact that, for the second consecutive year, the Council has rejected Parliament's proposal for an amendment concerning the creation of a new line 05 02 08 12 - School fruit scheme; welcomes, however, the political agreement of the Council on the legal base for such a programme;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 School fruit and vegetables scheme 16. Deplores the fact that, for the second consecutive year, the Council has rejected Parliament's proposal for an amendment concerning the creation of a new line 05 02 08 12 - School fruit and vegetables scheme; welcomes, however, the political agreement of the Council on the legal base for such a programme
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) Food programme for the most deprived persons in the European Union 16a. Welcomes the financing proposed by the Commission and approved by the Council to improve the current food distribution programme for the most deprived persons in the Union by increasing the budget by two thirds to around EUR 500 million for 2009 and extending the range of products that can be provided;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Expresses its regret that, once more, heading 4 has been under steady pressure since its available margins are not sufficient to finance priorities that have arisen in the course of the year without jeopardising its traditional priorities; reiterates its concerns that the funds available in this heading do not, as they stand, allow the Union to assume its role as a global player despite its various declarations of intent;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Expresses its regret that, once more, heading 4 has been under steady pressure since its available margins are not sufficient to finance priorities that have arisen in the course of the year without jeopardising its traditional priorities; reiterates its concerns that the funds available in this heading do not, as they stand, allow the Union to assume its role as a global player despite its various declarations of intent; asks the Commission to present as quickly as possible an evaluation of the situation regarding heading 4 in order to examine the Union's budgetary capacity to assume its role as a global partner within the constraints of the annual budgetary procedures
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Draws attention to the need to make available more funds to support the millions of Iraqis refugees and displaced people; notes that the office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) estimates that more than 4 million Iraqis are currently displaced from their homes, including some 2.2 million inside Iraq and up to 2 million refugees; points out, in addition, that Iraq continues to accommodate some 41,000 refugees who are in need of protection and assistance; stresses that the UNHCR is facing a refugee situation which involves the largest urban population that it has ever been called on to attend to, and which places an unprecedented burden on the economies and social infrastructure of host countries (Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt, Turkey, Iran, the Gulf States and countries further afield);
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Notes that appropriations for assistance to Kosovo will only just suffice to keep pace with reforms and investment; recalls its various commitments to EU assistance in Kosovo
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Notes with satisfaction that the Union has committed itself to tackling soaring food prices in developing countries and that an agreement has finally been reached on the financing of a food facility and that complementarity with the European Development Fund and visibility of EU assistance have been ensured; regrets, nevertheless, that once more, due to the constrained margins in heading 4, a part of the appropriations for financing this food facility could only be found through redeployment within the heading;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Takes note of the increasing amount of EU funds being channelled through international organisations; repeats its call for the Commission to make every effort to obtain as much information as possible on external and internal audits of institutions and programmes receiving EU funds;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Takes note of the Commission's Communication of 26 November 2008 to the European Council entitled "A European Economic recovery Plan"; points out that this plan if approved by the European Council on 11-12 December 2008, will have a significant impact on Budget 2009; requests the Commission to further clarify this impact by providing the European Parliament, as one arm of the budgetary authority, with further details on the scope of its proposal and concrete figures relating to its implementation particularly in respect of the financial programming.
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Recalls the importance of financing policies dealing with the external dimension of climate change and expresses its concerns at the lack of any ambitious EU commitment on this issue in Budget 2009;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Decides to maintain its first reading position as regards encouraging the economic development of the Turkish Cypriot community; welcomes the support for the exhumation, identification and return of remains of missing persons in Cyprus and undertakes to monitor its implementation;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Regrets, in that context, that it was necessary to reduce the financial envelope of the Stability Instrument by EUR 170 million over two years;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 b (new) 22 b. Stresses that the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria has proven to be an effective financing mechanism but deplores the fact that the Global Fund is not an implementing agent; reminds the Commission that in order to implement Global Fund grants effectively, increased financial resources will need to be spent on technical assistance;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Draws the Commission's attention to the former Amicus preparatory action, which has now been integrated into the "Youth in Action Programme"; requests the Commission to ensure a close follow- up of its implementation and to report to Parliament's relevant committees by 30 June 2009";
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Calls upon the Commission in this context to find a way to finance the International Fund for Cultural Diversity within existing programmes;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Decides to maintain the increase in the amounts for operational expenses of FRONTEX, in order to enable it to run permanent missions all year round; also decides to maintain the increase in the amounts for tackling illegal immigration, including bolstering the European Refugee Fund to facilitate solidarity between Members States;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Reiterates in this context the importance of the budgetary review planned for 2009, which should not be limited to a theoretical vision of a post- 2013 budget, but should include bold proposals for a shift in programming at the time of the mid-term review of the multi-annual programmes to respond to the challenges posed by climate change and the current crisis;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Insists that the current crisis not be used as a pretext to delay a much needed reorientation of spending towards "green" investments, but should rather be used as an extra incentive to press ahead with such reorientation;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Reiterates that initiatives for sustainable development, growth in jobs and support for SMEs and for research and innovation are of the utmost importance in the current economic situation and have to be top priorities reflected in the Union's budget for 2009; against this background, considers that the support for cohesion amongst regions has to be regarded as a key factor for stimulating economic growth throughout
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Reiterates that initiatives for growth in jobs and support for SMEs and for research and innovation are of the utmost importance in the current economic situation and have to be top priorities reflected in the Union's budget for 2009; against this background, considers that the support for cohesion amongst regions has to be regarded as a key factor for stimulating economic growth throughout the Union; considers it essential that the political determination to make progress on tackling climate change and providing citizens with a safer Europe become clearly visible in the EU budget; stresses that, in 2009 and in the years to come, the Union has to be in a position to fulfil its role as a global player especially given recent challenges such as rising food prices;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Supports Letter of amendment No 1 to the preliminary draft budget (PDB) 2009, in particular as it seems to give a slightly more realistic picture of needs in heading 4 than the PDB; takes note of Letter of amendment No 2/2009 in its traditional aspects of updating the figures underlying the estimate of agricultural expenditure in the PDB and points out that this letter leaves a significant margin beneath the ceiling of heading 2 of the MFF of more than EUR 3 billion in commitment appropriations; takes note of Letter of amendment No 3/2009 aiming at covering - within Council's budget - the cost (EUR 1,06 million) of the reflection group set up by the European Council of 15-16 October 2008;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. On overall figures, sets the final level of commitment appropriations at EUR xxx xxx million; sets the overall level of payments at EUR 116 096 million, equivalent to 0,89% of EU GNI ; notes that this leaves a significant margin of EUR 7 762 million beneath the payments ceiling of the multi-annual financial framework (MFF) for 2009; stresses that the overall level of payments for Budget 2009 represents a significant decrease (around EUR 4 billion) compared to the level adopted for Budget 2008 in December 2007, and only a moderate increase compared to the level of payments implementation of Budget 2008, as stated in the preliminary draft amending budget (PDAB) 10 /2008;
source: PE-416.388
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/4/rapporteur |
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/19 |
Old
New
|
committees/20 |
Old
New
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0534/COM_SEC(2008)0534_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0534/COM_SEC(2008)0534_EN.pdf |
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.436&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-409436_EN.html |
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.475&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AD-404475_EN.html |
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.464&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-409464_EN.html |
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.755&secondRef=04New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AD-407755_EN.html |
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.786&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AD-407786_EN.html |
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.408&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-409408_EN.html |
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.469&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-409469_EN.html |
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.792&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-409792_EN.html |
docs/13 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/13/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.741&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AD-407741_EN.html |
docs/14 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/14/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.409&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AD-409409_EN.html |
docs/15 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/15/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.430&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFCO-AD-409430_EN.html |
docs/16 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/16/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.466&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-409466_EN.html |
docs/17 |
|
docs/17/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.745&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-409745_EN.html |
docs/18 |
|
docs/18/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.721&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-409721_EN.html |
docs/20 |
|
docs/21 |
|
docs/22 |
|
docs/22/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.800&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-409800_EN.html |
docs/23 |
|
docs/23/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE412.009&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AD-412009_EN.html |
docs/28 |
|
events/0/date |
Old
2008-05-06T00:00:00New
2008-05-05T00:00:00 |
events/2/date |
Old
2008-07-17T00:00:00New
2008-07-16T00:00:00 |
events/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/10 |
|
events/10/date |
Old
2008-11-27T00:00:00New
2008-11-26T00:00:00 |
events/14 |
|
events/17 |
|
events/17 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.436&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.436&secondRef=03 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.475&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.475&secondRef=02 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.464&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.464&secondRef=02 |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2435/COM_SEC(2008)2435_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2435/COM_SEC(2008)2435_EN.pdf |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.755&secondRef=04New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.755&secondRef=04 |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.786&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.786&secondRef=02 |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.408&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.408&secondRef=02 |
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.469&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.469&secondRef=02 |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.792&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.792&secondRef=02 |
docs/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.741&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.741&secondRef=02 |
docs/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.409&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.409&secondRef=02 |
docs/13/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.430&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.430&secondRef=02 |
docs/14/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.466&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.466&secondRef=02 |
docs/15/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.745&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.745&secondRef=02 |
docs/16/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.721&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.721&secondRef=02 |
docs/17/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE412.037New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE412.037 |
docs/19/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.117New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE414.117 |
docs/20/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.800&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.800&secondRef=02 |
docs/21/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE412.009&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE412.009&secondRef=03 |
docs/22/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0398_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0398_EN.html |
docs/23/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2707/COM_SEC(2008)2707_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2707/COM_SEC(2008)2707_EN.pdf |
docs/24/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.179New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE415.179 |
docs/25/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE416.388New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE416.388 |
docs/28/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0486_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0486_EN.html |
events/3/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/4/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20081022&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20081022&type=CRE |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/11 |
|
events/12 |
|
events/12 |
|
events/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0486_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0486_EN.html |
events/13 |
|
events/13 |
|
events/13/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20081217&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20081217&type=CRE |
events/14 |
|
events/14 |
|
events/15/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0622_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0622_EN.html |
events/17 |
|
events/17 |
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-2-65-09B0_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-2-65-09B0_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/19 |
|
committees/19 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0534/COM_SEC(2008)0534_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/0534/COM_SEC(2008)0534_EN.pdf |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2435/COM_SEC(2008)2435_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2435/COM_SEC(2008)2435_EN.pdf |
docs/22/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-398&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0398_EN.html |
docs/23/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2707/COM_SEC(2008)2707_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2707/COM_SEC(2008)2707_EN.pdf |
docs/28/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-486&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0486_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-398&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0398_EN.html |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-515New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0515_EN.html |
events/13/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-486&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0486_EN.html |
events/15/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-622New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0622_EN.html |
events/17/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B[%g]-2009-165&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-2-65-09B0_EN.html |
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B[%g]-2009-165&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-2-65-09B0_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/19 |
|
committees/19 |
|
committees/20 |
|
committees/20 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
BUDG/6/69317New
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/3/committees/12/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
CREŢU GabrielaNew
CREȚU Gabriela |
activities/5/committees/12/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
CREŢU GabrielaNew
CREȚU Gabriela |
activities/16/docs/2/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:157:SOM:EN:HTMLNew
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2009:157:TOC |
committees/12/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
CREŢU GabrielaNew
CREȚU Gabriela |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|