Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | AFET | LAMBSDORFF Alexander Graf ( ALDE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 134o-p3
Legal Basis:
RoP 134o-p3Events
The European Parliament approved a resolution on the EU priorities for the 63rd Session of the UN General Assembly. The report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Alexander LAMBSDORFF (ALDE, DE) on behalf of the Committee on Foreign Affairs. In this resolution, the Parliament makes a number of recommendations to the Council and it also presents its official position for the 63rd Session of the UN General Assembly . The recommendation includes the following main points:
(1) the EU at the UN and ratification of the Lisbon Treaty : the Parliament calls for:
the Union’s political priorities for the next UN General Assembly session to be the subject of an in-depth, wide-ranging debate within the European institutions. It considers that this formal position should be regarded by the Permanent Representations of EU Member States in New York as a binding political platform to be used in negotiations with third countries; a reorganisation and expansion of the offices in New York and Geneva; the Council and the Commission to study in depth the implications which the Treaty of Lisbon has for the Union’s future representation at the United Nations; the Council to define, as soon as possible, the operational nature of the EU’s observer status at the United Nations; the Parliament be kept informed about the implications, including the budgetary ones, of any possible steps towards reorganisation of the EU's presence within the various component parts of the UN.
(2) the EU contribution to UN reforms : the Parliament calls for:
Member States to demand the review of the mandate and of the programme of work of the United Nations, so that it responds to the contemporary requirements of Member States; the Council to ensure that the Department of Peacekeeping Operations and the Department of Political Affairs are staffed to a level commensurate with their tasks and responsibilities; Members State to support efforts by the UN Secretary-General in the process of implementation of the concept of ‘responsibility to protect’; Member States to arrive at a more cohesive position on the reform of the UN Security Council, whilst maintaining the ultimate objective, of one permanent seat for the European Union within the United Nations, by aiming to increase the weight of the EU in a manner which is commensurate with the EU's contribution to UN peacekeeping operations and to UN development assistance; EU Member States present in the UN Security Council to uphold EU official positions.
(3) the EU and the UN Human Rights Council : the Parliament calls for:
· France and Slovakia, as newly elected members of the UN Human Rights Council, to double their efforts in ensuring the successful operation of the Human Rights Council;
· the Council to sustain efforts aimed at increasing the accountability of UN Member States in the field of human rights, by increasing the efficiency of the Universal Peer Review;
· more attention to be given to civil society, ensuring that effective ways and instruments are introduced so that civil society can fully participate in the UN Human Rights Council deliberations;
all EU Member States to protect the rights of children by supporting the mainstreaming of children’s rights in all activities within relevant organs and mechanisms of the UN system .
(4) the EU and the UN Peacebuilding Commission (PBC) : the Parliament believes that it is necessary to:
· strengthen the role of the PBC in relation to the UN system and encourage contributions to the UN Peacebuilding Fund;
· facilitate consultation of the PBC on the mandate of integrated peace-building operations;
· improve coordination between actors, ensuring predictable financing and extend the international attention paid to post-conflict countries;
· ensure that human and financial resources available to the PBC are proportionate to the tasks and expectations of UN bodies and of the beneficiary countries.
(5) the EU and the MDGs : the Parliament requests:
· that the Council supports the calls by President Barroso and Commissioner Louis Michel for Member States to draw up clear, binding national timetables and budgets to increase real aid in order to reach the promised collective target of 0.56% of gross national income in 2010 and 0.7% in 2015;
· that the Council and the EU Member States initiate a UN-wide discussion on the targets to be met in terms of climate change;
· that the Council and EU Member States renew discussions about debt relief at the UN level;
· focusing on gender issues, particularly the abnormally high maternal mortality rates (500 000 women dying each year), and increasing funding for reproductive health services substantially;
· focusing on the current food crisis.
(6) improving EU-UN cooperation in practice : the Parliament requests that:
EU Member States which are permanent or non-permanent members of the United Nations Security Council advocate a revision of the UN sanctions system (terrorists' blacklists) to bring it into line with the obligations of the United Nations Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (UNCCPR); the EU actively encourage the parties in the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change to pursue negotiations with a view to concluding an international climate change agreement by the end of 2009, and promote the use of renewable and CO2-neutral energy sources; the Council continue to give high priority to building successful cross-regional partnerships to ensure effective implementation of UN General Assembly Resolution 62/149, which calls for a worldwide moratorium on executions with a view to abolishing the death penalty; the Member States make the necessary efforts to secure an international consensus that will enable the negotiations on the Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism to be concluded; the 63rd UN session offer the opportunity to promote the treaty banning cluster munitions, with a view to the conclusion of an International Arms Trade Treaty (particularly weapons containing uranium); the Council encourage all activities aimed at the mainstreaming of gender issues into all aspects of the UN's activities.
The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the report by Alexander LAMBSDORFF (ALDE, DE) containing a proposal for a European Parliament recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 63rd Session of the UN General Assembly.
The proposal for a recommendation includes 6 fundamental points:
1) the EU at the UN and ratification of the Lisbon Treaty : MEPs:
call for the Union’s political priorities for the next UN General Assembly session to be the subject of an in-depth, wide-ranging debate within the European institutions; consider that this formal position should be regarded by the Permanent Representations of EU Member States in New York as a binding political platform to be used in negotiations with other countries; call for a reorganisation and expansion of the offices in New York and Geneva; urge the Council and the Commission to study in depth the implications which the Treaty of Lisbon has for the Union’s future representation at the United Nations; encourage the Council to define, as soon as possible, the operational nature of the EU’s observer status at the United Nations; request that Parliament be kept informed about the implications, including the budgetary ones, of any possible steps towards reorganisation of the EU's presence within the various component parts of the UN.
2) the EU contribution to UN reforms : MEPs:
encourage Member States to demand the review of the mandate and of the programme of work of the United Nations, so that it responds to the contemporary requirements of Member States; urge the Council to ensure that the Department of Peacekeeping Operations and the Department of Political Affairs are staffed to a level commensurate with their tasks and responsibilities; urge the Members State to support efforts by the UN Secretary-General in the process of implementation of the concept of ‘responsibility to protect’; call on Member States to arrive at a more cohesive position on the reform of the UN Security Council, whilst maintaining the ultimate objective, within a reformed United Nations, of one permanent seat for the European Union ; call on EU Member States present in the UN Security Council to uphold EU official positions.
3) the EU and the UN Human Rights Council : the parliamentary committee:
urges France and Slovakia, as newly elected members of the UN Human Rights Council, to redouble their efforts in ensuring the successful operation of the Human Rights Council; calls on the Council to sustain efforts aimed at increasing the accountability of UN Member States in the field of human rights, by increasing the efficiency of the Universal Peer Review; calls on all EU Member States to protect the rights of children by supporting the mainstreaming of children’s rights in all activities within relevant organs and mechanisms of the UN system.
4) the EU and the UN Peacebuilding Commission (PBC) : MEPs believe that it is necessary to:
strengthen the role of the PBC in relation to the UN system and encourage contributions to the UN Peacebuilding Fund; give greater international attention to post-conflict countries; ensure that human and financial resources available to the PBC are proportionate to the tasks and expectations of UN bodies and of the beneficiary countries.
5) the EU and the MDGs : MEPs request:
that the Council supports the calls by President Barroso and Commissioner Louis Michel for Member States to draw up clear, binding national timetables and budgets to increase real aid in order to reach the promised collective target of 0.56% of gross national income in 2010 and 0.7% in 2015; that the Council and the EU Member States initiate a UN-wide discussion on the targets to be met in terms of climate change; that the Council and EU Member States renew discussions about debt relief at the UN level; focusing on the abnormally high maternal mortality rates (500 000 women dying each year) and increasing funding for reproductive health services substantially ; focusing on the current food crisis.
6) improving EU-UN cooperation in practice : MEPs request that:
EU Member States which are permanent or non-permanent members of the United Nations Security Council advocate a revision of the UN sanctions system (terrorists’ blacklists) to bring it into line with the obligations of the United Nations Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (UNCCPR); the EU actively encourage the parties in the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change to pursue negotiations with a view to concluding an international climate change agreement by the end of 2009, and promote the use of renewable and CO 2 -neutral energy sources; the Council continue to give high priority to building successful cross-regional partnerships to ensure effective implementation of UN General Assembly Resolution 62/149, which calls for a worldwide moratorium on executions with a view to abolishing the death penalty; the Member States make the necessary efforts to secure an international consensus that will enable the negotiations on the Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism to be concluded; the Council encourage all activities aimed at the mainstreaming of gender issues into all aspects of the UN’s activities.
PURPOSE: to propose a European Parliament recommendation to the Council on the 63 rd session of the United Nations General Assembly.
CONTENT: pursuant to Rule 114(1) of the Rules of Procedure, Alexander LAMBSDORFF (ALDE, DE) and Annemie NEYTS-UYTTEBROECK (ALDE, BE) propose, on behalf of the ALDE Group, a draft recommendation to the Council on the 63 rd session of the United Nations General Assembly.
In this recommendation, the European Parliament notes that the coordination of EU Member States' positions within the United Nations varies sharply from body to body and from policy to policy. It also notes that the Treaty of Lisbon confers legal personality upon the EU, an innovation which will have major repercussions for the representation of the Union at the United Nations.
Visibility of the European Union at the United Nations : Parliament calls for the Union’s political priorities for the next UN General Assembly session to be the subject of an in-depth, wide-ranging debate in Brussels, and to be spelt out in a formal position of the Council. This formal position should be regarded by Permanent Representations in New York as a binding political platform to be used as a basis for negotiations with other countries. Parliament urges the Council to study in depth the implications which the Treaty of Lisbon has for the Union’s future representation at the UN and Member States to commit themselves unequivocally to taking all the necessary steps to ensure that the Union enjoys adequate visibility and authority within the UN bodies and fora.
The EU contribution to the United Nations reform : Parliament calls on the Council, the Commission and the Member States to continue to press for the establishment of membership criteria for the purposes of elections to the UNHRC. Pending such a reform, EU Member States in the UNHRC are asked to apply those criteria when determining their support for candidate countries. Parliament points to the need for the EU to speak with one voice in addressing human rights issues , but also to the fact that it is important for each EU Member State to voice the EU position, in order to give it more weight. It strongly believes that, by establishing the Peacebuilding Commission, the United Nations member states have created an important new structure to support fragile societies recovering from the devastation of war. The Council must support the work of the Peacebuilding Commission, highlighting any gaps that threaten to undermine peace.
Lastly, Parliament felt that Member States need to find a more cohesive position on the reform of the UN Security Council.
PURPOSE: to propose a European Parliament recommendation to the Council on the 63 rd session of the United Nations General Assembly.
CONTENT: pursuant to Rule 114(1) of the Rules of Procedure, Alexander LAMBSDORFF (ALDE, DE) and Annemie NEYTS-UYTTEBROECK (ALDE, BE) propose, on behalf of the ALDE Group, a draft recommendation to the Council on the 63 rd session of the United Nations General Assembly.
In this recommendation, the European Parliament notes that the coordination of EU Member States' positions within the United Nations varies sharply from body to body and from policy to policy. It also notes that the Treaty of Lisbon confers legal personality upon the EU, an innovation which will have major repercussions for the representation of the Union at the United Nations.
Visibility of the European Union at the United Nations : Parliament calls for the Union’s political priorities for the next UN General Assembly session to be the subject of an in-depth, wide-ranging debate in Brussels, and to be spelt out in a formal position of the Council. This formal position should be regarded by Permanent Representations in New York as a binding political platform to be used as a basis for negotiations with other countries. Parliament urges the Council to study in depth the implications which the Treaty of Lisbon has for the Union’s future representation at the UN and Member States to commit themselves unequivocally to taking all the necessary steps to ensure that the Union enjoys adequate visibility and authority within the UN bodies and fora.
The EU contribution to the United Nations reform : Parliament calls on the Council, the Commission and the Member States to continue to press for the establishment of membership criteria for the purposes of elections to the UNHRC. Pending such a reform, EU Member States in the UNHRC are asked to apply those criteria when determining their support for candidate countries. Parliament points to the need for the EU to speak with one voice in addressing human rights issues , but also to the fact that it is important for each EU Member State to voice the EU position, in order to give it more weight. It strongly believes that, by establishing the Peacebuilding Commission, the United Nations member states have created an important new structure to support fragile societies recovering from the devastation of war. The Council must support the work of the Peacebuilding Commission, highlighting any gaps that threaten to undermine peace.
Lastly, Parliament felt that Member States need to find a more cohesive position on the reform of the UN Security Council.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)4891
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0339/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0265/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0265/2008
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE407.704
- Committee draft report: PE405.972
- Non-legislative basic document: B6-0176/2008
- Non-legislative basic document published: B6-0176/2008
- Non-legislative basic document: B6-0176/2008
- Committee draft report: PE405.972
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE407.704
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0265/2008
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)4891
Amendments | Dossier |
104 |
2008/2111(INI)
2008/06/04
AFET
104 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a recommendation Citation 4 – having regard to its resolutions of 29 January 2004 on the relations between the European Union and the United Nations and of 9 June 2005 on the reform of the United Nations and of 29 September 2005 on the outcome of the United Nations World Summit of 14-16 September 2005,
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital G G. whereas the UN Department for Peacekeeping Operations currently manages
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point aa (aa) is concerned
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point aa (aa) welcomes the great success of Dublin Diplomatic Conference on Cluster Munitions; however, is concerned by the stalemate in disarmament-related talks and negotiations, particularly with regard to
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point aa a (new) (aaa) urges the Member States to make the necessary efforts to secure an international consensus that will enable the negotiations on the Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism to be concluded,
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point aa a (new) (aaa) calls on the Council to encourage all activities and appropriate financing aimed at the mainstreaming of gender issues into all aspects of the UN’s activities,
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point aa b (new) (aab) urges the Council to support all activities aimed at combating the extinction of species and protection of the environment as well as mobilising the necessary financial resources;
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas the Court of First Instance of the European Communities and the Council of Europe have found that the UN system of terrorist blacklists, imposing targeted sanctions on certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism, infringes certain fundamental rights and constitutes a violation of fundamental freedoms,
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital J J. whereas such coordination requires closer cooperation between the European Commission, the relevant Brussels-based working groups
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital J J. whereas such coordination requires closer cooperation between the relevant Brussels-based working groups of the Council and the EU Offices and the
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital K a (new) Ka. whereas the adoption of a universal moratorium on the use of the death penalty – one of the most important results for the European Union in terms of diplomacy and promotion of the rule of law – has been achieved thanks to the determination of the Italian government headed by Romano Prodi and the insistence of the European Parliament in the face of considerable resistance from the Council’s working groups,
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point a (a) calls for the Union’s political priorities for the next UN General Assembly session to be the subject of an in-depth, wide- ranging debate in Brussels, with the active involvement of the European Parliament,
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point a (a) calls for the Union’s political priorities for the next UN General Assembly session to be the subject of an in-depth, wide- ranging debate
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point a (a) calls for the Union’s political priorities for the next UN General Assembly session to be the subject of an in-depth, wide- ranging debate in Brussels, with the active involvement of the European Parliament and civil society, and to be spelt out in a formal position of the Council,
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point b (b) considers that this formal position should be regarded by the Permanent Representations of EU Member States in New York as a binding political platform to be used in negotiations with other countries, where necessary leaving individual Member States free to diverge from the common position in so far as such divergence is dictated by their nationally determined priorities,
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point b (b) considers that this formal position should be regarded by the Permanent Representations of EU Member States in New York as a
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a recommendation Citation 5 a (new) – having regard to the results of the Ninth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity held from 19 to 30 May 2008 in Bonn,
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point c (c) believes that the coordination of EU Member States’ positions within the United Nations should generally begin in the relevant
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point c (c) believes that the coordination of EU Member States’ positions within the United Nations should
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point d (d) invites the Council and the Commission to consider
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point d (d) invites the Council and the Commission to consider, with a view to ratification of the Lisbon Treaty, a reorganisation of their offices in New York and Geneva which guarantees optimal coordination and synergy between Community policies, programmes and funds and the instruments and missions comprised in the Union’s Common Foreign and Security Policy,
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point e (e)
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point e (e) urges the Council to
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point e (e) urges the Council and the Commission to study in depth the implications which the Treaty of Lisbon has for the Union’s future representation at the United Nations, and calls on EU Member States to commit themselves clearly and unequivocally to ensuring that the Union enjoys adequate visibility and
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) encourages the Council to negotiate and define the operational status of the EU’s ‘observers’ at the United Nations as soon as possible;
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point f (f) calls equally on Member States to seek a review of the current structure of
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point h (h) welcomes the resumption of the activities of the Working Group on the revitalisation of the UN General Assembly tasked with identifying ways to enhance the Assembly’s role, authority, effectiveness and efficiency, and calls on the EU Member States to promote
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a recommendation Citation 5 a (new) – having regard to the 2009 Review Conference of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court,
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point h a (new) (ha) reminds Member States that the UN is an unelected institution, with no popular mandate and no democratic accountability; therefore believes that, whilst international cooperation between countries is generally a good thing, in the interests of defending the principles of democracy the EU should be more assertive in recognising the greater moral authority of its own democratic sovereign states and very cautious about implying that the UN – an institution prone to corruption – somehow better represents the interests of the peoples of Europe than their own elected governments,
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point k (k) urges the Council to ensure that the Department of Peacekeeping Operations
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point k a (new) (ka) urges the Members State to support efforts by UN Secretary-General in the process of implementation of the concept of ‘responsibility to protect’, as endorsed at the 2005 World Summit; calls on Member States to participate actively in this process,
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point l (l) invites the Council to fully support the re-launch of negotiations aimed at implementing the recommendations of the High-Level Panel on System-wide Coherence, and
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point l (l) invites the Council to fully support the re-launch of negotiations aimed at implementing the recommendations of the High-Level Panel on System-wide Coherence, and calls on EU Member States to make full use of the Union’s collective leverage, as well as their own leverage,
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point m (m) calls on Member States to
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point m (m) calls on Member States to arrive at a more cohesive position on the reform of the UN Security Council
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point m (m) calls on Member States to arrive at a more cohesive position on the reform of the UN Security Council – one which, whilst maintaining the ultimate objective, within a reformed United Nations, of one permanent seat for the European Union (an objective which should not be achieved at the expense of those EU Member States that are members of the UN Security Council in their own right), aims in the meantime at augmenting the weight of the Union in a manner which is commensurate with the EU’s contribution to UN peacekeeping operations and to UN development assistance,
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point n Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point n (n) reminds Member States in this respect that, regardless of the final configuration which will be decided for this body, it is of the utmost importance to ensure that EU Member States present in the UN Security Council
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas 2008 is a crucial year for the efforts to eradicate poverty and achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) worldwide by 2015, and whereas EU Member States should provide global leadership ahead of the relevant key meetings to be held in the second half of this year,
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point n (n) reminds Member States in this respect that
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point o (o) calls on Member States to support President Kerim’s Task Force on Security Council reform;
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point o (o) calls on Member States to support President Kerim’s Task Force on Security Council reform;
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point o a (new) (oa) believes that the upcoming effects of climate change will make natural disasters, affecting millions of people, ever more frequent in the coming years, and that the New Orleans and Burma experiences indicate that more has to be done on the international and national level to prepare governments for efficient disaster management; calls on the Council to support the creation of a disaster counselling unit at UN level, possibly under the auspices of the International Committee of the Red Cross – as a neutral body –, in order to offer systematic screening and advice to governments on effective disaster preparedness,
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point o a (new) Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point o b (new) (plus new heading) The EU and the UN Millennium Development Goals (ob) deeply concerned that the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals will be made even more difficult by the current dramatic food crisis, in which rising prices are rendering staple foods inaccessible for the poor in many developing countries, and by the impact of climate change – the costs of adaptation and mitigation being estimated by UN experts at between USD 50 and 100 billion per year, reminds the Member States of their commitments to significantly increase financing for official development aid (ODA) step by step in order to reach 0.56% of the collective gross national income by 2010, so that the EU as a whole reaches 0.7% in 2015,
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point o c (new) (oc) deeply worried by the fact that, instead, the EU Member States have reduced official development aid in 2007 compared to 2006, calls on the Council and Member States to place the achievement of the MDGs and the increase in the financing needed to attain them at the core of their priorities at the UN,
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point o d (new) (od) recalls that the Court of First Instance of the European Communities and the Council of Europe have found that the UN system of blacklists imposing targeted sanctions on certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (originating with Security Council Resolution 1267 (1999) and Security Council Resolution 1373 (2001)) violates the fundamental principles of human rights and the rule of law; calls particularly on those Member States of the European Union which are permanent or non-permanent members of the United Nations Security Council to fight for a substantial improvement of the sanctions system in order to bring it into line with the obligations imposed by the United Nations Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (UNCCPR), in particular by means of the introduction of an appeal mechanism,
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point p (p) urges EU Member States, especially France and Slovakia as newly elected members of the UN Human Rights Council, to redouble their efforts in ensuring the successful operation of the Human Rights Council; in this respect, calls for greater accountability in the procedure for the establishment and renewal of Special Procedures and for the appointment of mandate holders, which should be based on the principles of transparency and real competition,
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point p (p) urges EU Member states to redouble their efforts in ensuring the successful operation of the Human Rights Council while protecting and promoting universal rights; in this respect, calls for greater accountability in the procedure for the establishment and renewal of Special Procedures and for the
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital E b (new) Eb. whereas, with regard to the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), EU efforts serve as an important catalyst and an example to other donors but will nevertheless still fall short, by EUR 75 billion, of the EU’s official development aid commitments by 2010,
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point p a (new) (pa) stresses the importance of participation by civil society in the work of the UN Human Rights Council, and urges the EU Member States taking part in the work of the UN Human Rights Council to introduce effective ways and instruments enabling civil society to participate in the UN Human Rights Council in order to better protect human rights in the world and to contribute positively to the transparency of the institution,
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point p a (new) (pa) calls on the Council to sustain efforts aimed at increasing the accountability of UN member states in the field of human rights by increasing the efficiency of the Universal Peer Review, notably by tightening up procedures to avoid deliberate obstruction or diversionary tactics and ensuring that relevant NGOs have their say in the proceedings,
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point q (q) is concerned by recent comments on the work of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the impact these could have on the independence of the Office; reiterates its support for the Office and calls on EU Member States to closely monitor the procedure for the appointment of the new High Commissioner when the mandate of the current incumbent expires in June 2008, and to closely monitor the debate on the work of the High Commissioner in the Human Rights Council as well as on resources for the Office of the High Commissioner in the Fifth Committee of the General Assembly, so as to ensure that there is no interference with the independence of the Office and that the Office is granted all the financial resources needed to enable it to carry out its mandate in complete independence,
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point r (r) calls on all EU Member states to remain engaged in the preparations for the 2009 Durban Review Conference and to ensure that the Conference provides the opportunity for all stakeholders to renew their determination and commitment to fight racism, racial discrimination and related intolerance and to adopt concrete benchmarks with a view to the eradication of racism, on the basis of, and fully respecting, the Durban Declaration and the Programme of Action,
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point r (r) calls on all EU Member States to remain engaged in the preparations for the 2009 Durban Review Conference and to ensure that the Conference provides the opportunity for all stakeholders to renew their determination and commitment to fight racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point r (r) calls on all EU Member States to remain engaged in the preparations for the 2009 Durban Review Conference and ensure that the Conference provides the opportunity for all stakeholders to renew their determination and commitments to fight racism, racial and caste discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and to adopt concrete benchmarks in view of the eradication of racism,
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point s (s) calls on the Council to make sure that there is no recurrence of the negative events associated with the initial Durban conference;
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point s a (new) (sa) calls on all EU Member States to promote and protect the rights of children by supporting the mainstreaming of children’s rights in all activities within relevant organs and mechanisms of the UN system,
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point t (t) takes the view that EU Member States should collectively support a strengthening of the role of the PBC in relation to
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point t a (new) (ta) invites the Council and the Member States to encourage contributions to the UN Peacebuilding Fund in order to ensure that it is provided with sufficient resources,
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital E c (new) Ec. whereas in sub-Saharan Africa many countries are not on track to meet any of the MDGs, and whereas in many middle- income countries too there are regions and ethnic groups made up of millions of people who are making unsatisfactory progress towards meeting the targets,
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point u (u) urges EU Member States in the Security Council to facilitate consultation of the PBC on the
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point v (v) considers it essential that, besides improving coordination between actors, ensuring predictable financing and extending the international attention paid to post-conflict countries, the PBC should also address, in conjunction with the relevant UN departments, the need to improve the organisation’s learning capacity in the field of peacebuilding,
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point w (w) in view of the above, stresses the need to ensure that human and financial resources available to the PBC are proportionate to the tasks and expectations of UN bodies and of the beneficiary countries, and calls on the EU Member States to raise this issue in the relevant committee of the UN General Assembly,
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point w a (new) (plus new heading) The EU and the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) (wa) reaffirms the fact that there is equal importance and complementarity between the three pillars of the UN – peace and security, human rights and development – and draws the attention of the Council and the Member States to the fact that the achievement of the MDGs would create a more secure, just and prosperous world, and would reduce the probability of conflict,
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point w b (new) (wb) recognises that 2008 is a crucial year for efforts to eradicate poverty and achieve the MDGs worldwide by 2015; welcomes the EU Agenda for Action on MDGs with its 2010 milestones, and urges the Council and the Member States to provide global leadership ahead of the key meetings to be held in the second half of this year: the G8 summit in Hokkaido, the Third High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in Accra, the UN high-level meeting on the MDGs, and the International Conference on Financing for Development in Doha,
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point w c (new) (wc) supports the calls by President Barroso and Commissioner Louis Michel for Member States to draw up clear national timetables to increase real aid to meet the collective target of 0.56% of gross national income in 2010 and 0.7% in 2015; praises Belgium, Cyprus, Estonia, Finland, Ireland, Romania, Slovenia, Spain and the United Kingdom for having already agreed timetables; underlines that, in order to ensure the predictability of aid, Member States must make these timetables binding and respect them in national budget allocations,
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point w d (new) (wd) believes that EU efforts will also serve as an important catalyst and an example to other donors; however, warns EU Member States that if current trends are not reversed, the EU will fall short of its official development aid commitments by EUR 75 billion by 2010,
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point w e (new) (we) remains concerned that in sub- Saharan Africa many countries are not on track to meet any of the MDGs and also that in many middle-income countries there are regions and ethnic groups made up of millions of people who are making unsatisfactory progress towards meeting the targets,
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point w f (new) (wf) draws the attention of the Member States to the remarkable successes achieved in the rest of Africa, where several countries are on track to reach every MDG with the exception of maternal mortality, and observes that this proves the feasibility of rapid progress if government leadership and rigorous implementation plans are backed up by adequate domestic and external financing,
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point w f (new) (wf) considers that maternal mortality rates remain unacceptably high in many developing countries, with more than 500 000 women dying each year from treatable and preventable complications relating to pregnancy and childbirth; therefore urges EU Member States to dramatically step up efforts and funding so as to ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health information and services which are essential for the attainment of the health MDGs, gender equality and the fight against poverty,
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital E d (new) Ed. whereas soaring food prices and slowing global growth threaten to set back progress on the MDGs by an estimated 7 years unless further investment is made in the agricultural sector and the agro-food industry in developing countries,
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point w g (new) (wg) reminds Member States that no new promises or new procedures are needed now to achieve the MDGs, and that the focus must be on meeting the promises and pledges already made and scaling up the existing procedures,
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point w h (new) (wh) notes the continued need for the crisis in the public financing of health services to be addressed if the three health MDGs are to be put back on track, through adequate and predictable recurrent funding for human resources, access to medicines and decentralised and participatory management, and calls on EU Member States to make every effort to strengthen universal, integrated health systems which respond to local needs, and gradually to include the integration of disease-specific programmes (MDG 6),
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point w i (new) (wi) considers that gender equality (MDG 3) is an essential element in efforts to meet the MDG targets and recommends that EU Member States urgently address the global financing gap for the achievement of MDG 3; notes that, alongside education, the empowerment of women significantly contributes to the attainment of MDG 4 on child mortality and MDG 5 on maternal health, which are critical indicators of overall progress in development,
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point w j (new) (wj) notes that, despite significant progress towards universal primary education in recent years, some 93 million children of primary school age were still not in school in 2006, the majority of them girls; calls on the EU Member States to address the increased financial needs to support education, including in conflict- affected fragile states,
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point w k (new) (wk) notes that debt relief is one of the targets of MDG 8, which aims specifically to ‘deal comprehensively with developing countries’ debt problems through national and international measures to make debt sustainable in the long term’,
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point w l (new) (wl) recommends that the Council and EU Member States renew discussions about debt relief at UN level, with a view to redefining debt sustainability criteria in such a way as to promote the advancement of development goals rather than debt reimbursement, and with a view to considering the principle of creditor co- responsibility for the remaining USD 500 billion of odious and illegitimate debt, as well as its possible cancellation,
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point w m (new) (wm) recalling the EU’s commitments to promote policy coherence for development, recommends that the Council and the EU Member States encourage a UN-wide discussion on how to ensure that efforts and targets on climate change reinforce the attainment of the MDGs; and notes that much greater contributions to adaptation funds are required in order to ‘climate-proof’ development in the poorest countries,
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point w n (new) (wn) considers that soaring food prices and slowing global growth threaten to set back progress on the MDGs by an estimated 7 years; underlines the need for further investment in the agricultural sector and the agro-food industry in developing countries, particularly for the benefit of small-scale farmers who are typically female, since development of productive capacity, particularly in the agro-food industry, is essential to long- term poverty reduction,
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point w o (new) (wo) in light of the current food crisis, urges the Council and EU Member States to take steps to reduce trade distortion and promote a fair and equitable rules-based trade system,
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point x (x)
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital E e (new) Ee. whereas the UN General Assembly decided to hold on 4 and 5 October 2007 the High-level Dialogue on interreligious and intercultural cooperation for the promotion of tolerance, understanding and universal respect on matters of freedom of religion or belief and cultural diversity, in coordination with other similar initiatives in this area,
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point x (x) calls on the Council to continue its efforts and to fulfil its commitments to achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) by the target date of 2015 and is, in this context, concerned by the scale of the current food crisis and the impact it could have on the achievement of the MDGs; calls on the Council to ensure that the UN is granted the means necessary to tackle this crisis,
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point x a (new) (xa) calls on the UN General Assembly to hold discussions highlighting the importance, in 2008 and thereafter, of advancing the Alliance of Civilisations – an initiative officially sponsored by the United Nations – in particular by discussing initiatives such as the development of joint multi-stakeholder initiatives at the regional level, with a view to promoting better intercultural understanding, preventing the mounting of tensions and the rise of extremism, contributing to the upgrading of the intercultural dialogue between the countries bordering the northern and southern shores of the Mediterranean Sea, and launching a number of activities within the framework of active city diplomacy,
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point x a (new) (xa) reminds Member States that no further new promises or new procedures are needed in order to achieve the MDGs, and that the focus must be on meeting the promises and pledges already made and scaling up the existing procedures,
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point x b (new) (xb) urges the Member States to participate actively in the High Level Meeting on Africa’s Development Needs (NEPAD) to be held on 22 September 2008 and in the United Nations High Level meeting on the MDGs to be held on 25 September 2008 in New York,
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point x b (new) (xb) notes the continued need for the crisis in human resources to be addressed if the three health MDGs are to be put back on track, and calls on the EU Member States to implement their Action Plan to address the critical shortage of health workers in developing countries and ensure that they make every effort to strengthen universal, integrated health systems which respond to local needs, in addition to their increased support of vertical initiatives targeting infectious diseases (MDG 6),
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point x c (new) (xc) calls on the Council to promote energy efficiency as well as the global use and development of renewable energies and to support the UN in its central role in fighting and mitigating climate change,
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point x c (new) (xc) considers that gender equality (MDG 3) is an essential element in efforts to meet the MDG targets and recommends that EU Member States urgently address the global financing gap for the achievement of MDG 3; notes that, alongside education, the empowerment of women significantly contributes to the improvement of MDG 4 on child mortality and MDG 5 on maternal health, which are critical indicators of overall progress in development,
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point x c (new) (xc) urges the Member States and the Commission to support the United Nations Democracy Fund (UNDEF), in both political and financial terms,
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point x d (new) (xd) notes that, despite significant progress towards universal primary education in recent years, some 77 million children of primary school age were still not in school in 2007, the majority of them girls; therefore calls on the EU Member States to address the increased financial needs to support education, including in conflict-affected fragile states,
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point x e (new) (xe) recommends that the Council and EU Member States renew discussions about debt relief at the UN level, with a view to redefining debt sustainability criteria in such a way as to promote the advancement of development goals rather than debt reimbursement,
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital E f (new) Ef. whereas 2008 is the European Year of Intercultural Dialogue,
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point x f (new) (xf) recommends that the Council and the EU Member States encourage a UN-wide discussion on how to ensure that efforts and targets on climate change reinforce the attainment of the MDGs; and notes that much greater contributions to adaptation funds are required in order to ‘climate-proof’ development in the poorest countries,
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point -y a (new) (-ya) calls on the Council and particularly on those EU Member States which are permanent or non-permanent members of the United Nations Security Council to advocate a revision of the UN sanctions system (terrorists’ blacklists) to bring it into line with the obligations of the United Nations Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (UNCCPR), in particular via the establishment of appropriate notification and appeal procedures,
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point -y b (new) (plus new heading) The EU and UN activities in the field of security (-yb) believes that the EU should launch a debate within the UN prior to the ICC review conference with a view to achieving an agreement on the still outstanding definition of the crime of aggression and the conditions under which the Court could exercise its jurisdiction, as provided for in Article 5(2) of the Rome Statute,
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point -y b (new) (-yb) calls on the EU Member States to launch, within the UN and prior to the Review Conference, a debate on the challenges faced by the International Criminal Court which may undermine the Court’s effectiveness,
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point y a (new) (ya) calls on the Council to continue to give high priority to building successful cross-regional partnerships, in particular working with partners in all regions of the world to ensure effective implementation of UN General Assembly Resolution 62/149 calling for a worldwide moratorium on executions with a view to abolishing the death penalty, and to establish an effective international arms trade treaty,
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point y a (new) (ya) appeals to the Council to actively support the central role of the UN in the creation of a post-2012 global climate change agreement; calls on the Member States to actively participate in the comprehensive global negotiations leading to the conclusion of a long-term international climate change agreement by the end of 2009,
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point y b (new) (yb) calls on the Council to promote energy efficiency as well as the global use and development of renewable energies and to support the UN in its central role in fighting and mitigating climate change,
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point z Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point z (z)
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 – point aa (aa) is concerned
source: PE-407.704
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE405.972New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE405.972 |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.704New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE407.704 |
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0265_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0265_EN.html |
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 134o-p3
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 134-p3
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-265&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0265_EN.html |
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2008-176&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2008-0176_EN.html |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-265&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0265_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-339New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0339_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
AFET/6/62515New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 134-p3
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 134-p3
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|