Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Opinion | BUDG | TITLEY Gary (PSE) | |
Lead | ECON | BECSEY Zsolt László (PPE-DE) | |
Opinion | EMPL | ||
Opinion | FEMM | WORTMANN-KOOL Corien (PPE-DE) | |
Opinion | IMCO | ||
Opinion | ITRE | RANSDORF Miloslav (GUE/NGL) | |
Opinion | JURI | GILL Neena (PSE) |
Legal Basis RoP 042
Activites
-
2009/03/24
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
-
T6-0166/2009
summary
The European Parliament adopted by 574 votes to 23, with 12 abstentions, a resolution with recommendations to the Commission on a European initiative for the development of micro-credits in support of growth and employment. The resolution is in response to a Commission Communication on a European initiative for the development of micro-credit in support of growth and employment. The Parliament recalls that difficult access to appropriate forms of finance is frequently referred to as a very important barrier to entrepreneurship, and that there is a significant potential demand for micro-credit in the EU that is currently not met. The Commission's current definition of micro-credit is a loan of EUR 25 000 or less and that a microenterprise is one that employs fewer than 10 persons and whose annual turnover or annual balance sheet total does not exceed EUR 2 million. However, those definitions do not seem to be pertinent for all national markets, and do not allow a clear distinction to be drawn between micro-credits and micro-loans to microenterprises, micro-credit for non-bankable borrowers and micro-credit for bankable microenterprises. MEPs note that the Commission has not taken forward the request made in Parliament's resolution of 11 July 2007 to draw up an action plan for micro-financing. They consider that the current financial crisis and its possible repercussions in the economy as a whole demonstrate the disadvantages of complex financial products and the need for considering ways of enhancing efficiency and having in place all possible channels for providing financing when businesses have reduced access to capital due to liquidity crunch, in particular in economically and socially disadvantages regions. In the light of these observations, the Commission is called upon to submit to Parliament a legislative proposal or proposals covering the matters dealt with in the detailed recommendations below: Recommendation 1: on awareness-raising as regards micro-credit: the introduction of the concept of micro-credit in relevant statistics and legislation on financial institutions; invite the Member States to standardise the statistical presentation of micro-credits (including the collection and analysis of data broken down according to gender, age and ethnic origin); develop a communication strategy with a view to promoting self-employment as an alternative to wage earning and, in particular, as a way to escape unemployment for disadvantaged target groups; invite Member States to implement tax incentives for private involvement in the micro-credit business; invite Member States to restrict the application of interest-rate caps to consumer loans; analyse - in the light of the last sub-prime crisis - the advantages and disadvantages of direct micro-credit formats as against securitised credit facilities. Recommendation 2: on EU funding: the (co-)financing of projects targeted at promoting the availability of micro-credit for all persons and enterprises without direct access to credit, such as disadvantaged target groups (for example, the Roma society, immigrants, people living in deprived rural areas, people with precarious work situations, and women); the provision by national or EU funds of guarantees for providers of micro-credit; the provision of business support services, to include mandatory targeted training for micro-credit borrowers, which can be financed under the Structural Funds; research and the exchange of best practices in the operational field; the creation of a website where potential recipients of micro-credits can present their projects and of an EU-wide database comprising positive and negative credit data on micro-credit borrowers; the appointment of a single coordination entity where all EU financing activities concerning micro-credit are pooled and the co-)financing of projects only where they can be combined with the retention of social security entitlements, such as unemployment benefit and income support. Recommendation 3: on a harmonised EU framework for bank and non-bank microfinance institutions (MFIs): the non-bank MFIs framework should include: a clear definition of micro-credit providers; the ability to conduct credit-only activities and to on-lend; harmonised, risk-based rules as regards authorisation, registration, reporting and prudential supervision. Recommendation 4: on Directive 2005/60/EC: the Commission should, while reviewing this Directive, ensure that the provisions laid down do not constitute obstacles preventing people who have no permanent address or personal identification documents from accessing micro-credit. Recommendation 5: on competition rules: provide for, inter alia, while reviewing the de minimis rules, a reduction of the administrative burden if the aid is granted in connection with micro-credit; specify that the role of micro-credit providers and, if applicable, the public support that such institutions receive are in line with the EU competition rules; implement rules that allow for a preferential treatment of goods and services provided by micro-credit borrowers in public procurement procedures.
- Results of vote in Parliament
-
T6-0166/2009
summary
-
2009/03/24
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
- SP(2009)3245/3
- DG Regional Policy, HÜBNER Danuta
- 2009/01/29 Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
- 2009/01/29 Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
-
2009/01/20
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
- 2008/10/16 Committee draft report
-
2008/05/22
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
2007/11/13
Non-legislative basic document published
-
COM(2007)0708
summary
PURPOSE: to reinforce the development of micro-credit in Europe with a view to improving access to finance for small businesses and for socially excluded people, also ethnic minorities, who want to become self-employed. BACKGROUND: micro-credit has been used very successfully in less developed countries, and there has already been some action in this field in the EU, both at Community and at national level. In the EU, demand for this type of finance - typically, loans averaging around EUR 7 700 - is overwhelmingly from people setting up small companies in the service sector. All indications point to high potential demand from people who, for various reasons, are unable to obtain loans in the traditional banking sector. This initiative is intended to set out a framework to coordinate our efforts at EU level by improving the legal and institutional environment in which micro-credit providers operate, and increasing the availability of capital. CONTENT: the present communication invites the Member States to adapt as appropriate national institutional, legal and commercial frameworks necessary to promote a more favourable environment for the development of micro-credit. The Commission is willing to help the Member States on matters of targeting and by compiling an inventory of good regulatory practices. It also recommends setting up a new European-level facility with staff to provide expertise and support for the development of non-bank micro-finance institutions in Member States. This would equip micro-financers to offer not just a loan, but a service mentoring the borrower to help develop and ensure the success of their business. This kind of accompaniment is the key to the success of micro-credit operations. Financial support for this facility would come from the existing technical assistance budget of the Structural Funds (European Regional Development Fund - ERDF) managed by the European Commission. In view of the interest expressed by the European Investment Fund in this field, the facility could be managed within the Fund which is also responsible for the JEREMIE initiative to support access to finance to SMEs. The proposed initiative has four different strands: 1) Improving the legal and institutional environment in the Member States: the institutional framework in the Member States appears to be often ill-suited to the development of micro-credit. Indeed, it is because micro-credit is usually not addressed specifically in the national or Community legislation that the statistics on micro-credit are underdeveloped. What is generally required is a series of actions improving what can be broadly described as the legal and institutional environment for micro-credit. The following highlights seven areas where improvement can be achieved at national level: i) create an environment allowing the development of micro-finance institutions (MFIs) and covering all segments of the clientele; ii) help micro-credit to become sustainable by relaxing interest caps for micro-credit operations; iii) allow MFIs access to borrower databases and facilitate their evaluation of the risks; iv) reduce operating costs applying favourable tax schemes; v) adapt national regulation and supervision to the specificity of micro-finance ; vi) ensure single market rules are applied to micro-credit; vii) incorporate micro-credit into regulation and accounting standards. 2) Further changing the climate in favour of entrepreneurship: actions include: i) improving the institutional framework for self-employment and micro-enterprises; ii) designing solutions to enable unemployed people and welfare recipients to make the transition into self-employment; iii) increasing chances of success of new micro-enterprises through training, mentoring and business development services. The Commission proposes to promote micro-credit and micro-enterprise development at national level. It invites the Member States to undertake a programme of reform aimed at improving the conditions for micro-credit according to national circumstances and priorities. In view of the focus in the Lisbon strategy improving access to finance, in general, and promoting micro-credit in particular, Member States are encouraged within the context of their National Reform Programmes under the Lisbon strategy to take on board those actions necessary to promote a more favourable environment for the development of micro-credit which fall within the national institutional, legal and commercial frameworks. The Commission could also help the Member States by indicating quantitative targets for loans and by compiling an inventory of good regulatory practices. 3) Promoting the spread of best practices, including training: dissemination of best practices is an important factor in the development of micro-credit which will continue to be fostered by existing resource centres such as the Microfinance Centre for Central and Eastern Europe, the European Microfinance Centre and the banks themselves. The Commission proposes: i) a central body with micro-financial expertise; ii) a micro-credit specific label to better involve EU citizens; iii) the need for a code of conduct for MFIs. 4) Providing additional financial capital for micro-credit institutions: the Commission intends to strengthen its contribution by setting up in the framework of EU cohesion policy a specific micro-credit facility providing funding and technical assistance to new and non-bank MFIs to enhance the supply of micro-credit. This facility would target the most promising non-bank MFIs by means of calls for proposals. Ideally, it would combine the provision of technical assistance with funding mobilised from various sources, such as EU structural funds, the EIB, the EUROFI network, banks and donors. It would aim at helping MFIs becoming self-sustaining and it would contribute improving the use of micro-credit in the EU by conducting market analysis, establishing guidelines and promoting training and learning opportunities that incorporate best practice in the field. In order to set this facility up rapidly and with a cost-effective structure, it is proposed to ask the European Investment Fund (EIF) to create and host a dedicated unit within their JEREMIE department. The funding for the staffing of the unit and the technical assistance work to MFIs would be covered through the technical assistance budget of the Structural Funds managed by the European Commission. The proposals included in this initiative would provide a base to start concrete actions aimed at developing and implementing micro-credit in the European Union. Lastly, appropriate communication campaigns must be undertaken in order to boost micro-credit in Europe and contribute to its development in the longer run, and evaluations carried out.
-
COM(2007)0708
summary
-
2007/11/13
Non-legislative basic document
-
COM(2007)0708
summary
PURPOSE: to reinforce the development of micro-credit in Europe with a view to improving access to finance for small businesses and for socially excluded people, also ethnic minorities, who want to become self-employed. BACKGROUND: micro-credit has been used very successfully in less developed countries, and there has already been some action in this field in the EU, both at Community and at national level. In the EU, demand for this type of finance - typically, loans averaging around EUR 7 700 - is overwhelmingly from people setting up small companies in the service sector. All indications point to high potential demand from people who, for various reasons, are unable to obtain loans in the traditional banking sector. This initiative is intended to set out a framework to coordinate our efforts at EU level by improving the legal and institutional environment in which micro-credit providers operate, and increasing the availability of capital. CONTENT: the present communication invites the Member States to adapt as appropriate national institutional, legal and commercial frameworks necessary to promote a more favourable environment for the development of micro-credit. The Commission is willing to help the Member States on matters of targeting and by compiling an inventory of good regulatory practices. It also recommends setting up a new European-level facility with staff to provide expertise and support for the development of non-bank micro-finance institutions in Member States. This would equip micro-financers to offer not just a loan, but a service mentoring the borrower to help develop and ensure the success of their business. This kind of accompaniment is the key to the success of micro-credit operations. Financial support for this facility would come from the existing technical assistance budget of the Structural Funds (European Regional Development Fund - ERDF) managed by the European Commission. In view of the interest expressed by the European Investment Fund in this field, the facility could be managed within the Fund which is also responsible for the JEREMIE initiative to support access to finance to SMEs. The proposed initiative has four different strands: 1) Improving the legal and institutional environment in the Member States: the institutional framework in the Member States appears to be often ill-suited to the development of micro-credit. Indeed, it is because micro-credit is usually not addressed specifically in the national or Community legislation that the statistics on micro-credit are underdeveloped. What is generally required is a series of actions improving what can be broadly described as the legal and institutional environment for micro-credit. The following highlights seven areas where improvement can be achieved at national level: i) create an environment allowing the development of micro-finance institutions (MFIs) and covering all segments of the clientele; ii) help micro-credit to become sustainable by relaxing interest caps for micro-credit operations; iii) allow MFIs access to borrower databases and facilitate their evaluation of the risks; iv) reduce operating costs applying favourable tax schemes; v) adapt national regulation and supervision to the specificity of micro-finance ; vi) ensure single market rules are applied to micro-credit; vii) incorporate micro-credit into regulation and accounting standards. 2) Further changing the climate in favour of entrepreneurship: actions include: i) improving the institutional framework for self-employment and micro-enterprises; ii) designing solutions to enable unemployed people and welfare recipients to make the transition into self-employment; iii) increasing chances of success of new micro-enterprises through training, mentoring and business development services. The Commission proposes to promote micro-credit and micro-enterprise development at national level. It invites the Member States to undertake a programme of reform aimed at improving the conditions for micro-credit according to national circumstances and priorities. In view of the focus in the Lisbon strategy improving access to finance, in general, and promoting micro-credit in particular, Member States are encouraged within the context of their National Reform Programmes under the Lisbon strategy to take on board those actions necessary to promote a more favourable environment for the development of micro-credit which fall within the national institutional, legal and commercial frameworks. The Commission could also help the Member States by indicating quantitative targets for loans and by compiling an inventory of good regulatory practices. 3) Promoting the spread of best practices, including training: dissemination of best practices is an important factor in the development of micro-credit which will continue to be fostered by existing resource centres such as the Microfinance Centre for Central and Eastern Europe, the European Microfinance Centre and the banks themselves. The Commission proposes: i) a central body with micro-financial expertise; ii) a micro-credit specific label to better involve EU citizens; iii) the need for a code of conduct for MFIs. 4) Providing additional financial capital for micro-credit institutions: the Commission intends to strengthen its contribution by setting up in the framework of EU cohesion policy a specific micro-credit facility providing funding and technical assistance to new and non-bank MFIs to enhance the supply of micro-credit. This facility would target the most promising non-bank MFIs by means of calls for proposals. Ideally, it would combine the provision of technical assistance with funding mobilised from various sources, such as EU structural funds, the EIB, the EUROFI network, banks and donors. It would aim at helping MFIs becoming self-sustaining and it would contribute improving the use of micro-credit in the EU by conducting market analysis, establishing guidelines and promoting training and learning opportunities that incorporate best practice in the field. In order to set this facility up rapidly and with a cost-effective structure, it is proposed to ask the European Investment Fund (EIF) to create and host a dedicated unit within their JEREMIE department. The funding for the staffing of the unit and the technical assistance work to MFIs would be covered through the technical assistance budget of the Structural Funds managed by the European Commission. The proposals included in this initiative would provide a base to start concrete actions aimed at developing and implementing micro-credit in the European Union. Lastly, appropriate communication campaigns must be undertaken in order to boost micro-credit in Europe and contribute to its development in the longer run, and evaluations carried out.
- DG Regional Policy, HÜBNER Danuta
-
COM(2007)0708
summary
Documents
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2007)0708
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2007)0708
- Committee draft report: PE414.375
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0041/2009
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0041/2009
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T6-0166/2009
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)3245/3
Amendments | Dossier |
79 |
2008/2122(INI)
2008/11/06
ITRE
20 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission's Communication, which aims to reinforce the development of micro-credit in the EU by improving the legal environment, enhancing entrepreneurship, exchanging best practice and providing financial capital, particularly for non-bankable people;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to encourage the development of permanent local microfinance institutions, such as credit unions, particularly in poor and marginal neighbourhoods, and in rural areas; calls on the Commission and Member States to focus efforts on the training of personnel in these areas in microfinance skills;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission, with a view to disseminating micro-credit as a means of generating economic activity, to look into the possibility of supporting this by means of innovative solutions such as mobile banking; calls, similarly, for it to promote forms of economic and social assistance such as loans to solidarity groups or solidarity credit cards;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Believes that the current turmoil in the financial markets and its possible repercussions for the economy as a whole, amplify the need for micro-credit in the EU, in particular in economically and socially disadvantaged regions;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Urges Member States to make better use of financial assistance through the Structural Funds, such as the European Regional Development Fund and the European Social Fund, in order to improve the access of specific target groups to micro-credit schemes;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Greatly welcomes the recent launching of the 'Joint Action to Support Micro-finance Institutions in Europe' (JASMINE) aiming at the provision of operational technical assistance as well as quality labelling to acknowledge the reliability of Micro-finance institutions (MFIs); emphasises that a flexible approach is essential to enable MFIs in each Member State to meet their individual challenges and requirements;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Strongly believes that, as a result of the interrelation of financial, employment and social welfare systems, the micro-credit initiative at EU level has to be complemented by policies at a national level, such as training, coaching and capacity building
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to develop economic and social indicators to evaluate the development and the impact of micro-credit.
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to help consolidate businesses that make use of micro-credit, by promoting external support and advice networks.
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Expresses concern at the proposal to lift interest rate caps on micro-credit, as excessively high interest rates have the potential to trap microfinance users in a vicious cycle of debt, thus defeating the purpose of micro-credit; urges the Commission and Member States to exercise extreme caution in interest rate policy.
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Points out the importance of training and capacity building in non-banking micro-finance institutions, in particular to enhance knowledge of the different forms of raising and providing capital, such as equity investment, donation, issuance of bonds, debt financing, contribution to risk funds and start-up grants; believes that exchange of best practices could also play a valuable role in that field; in that respect, urges the Commission to make full use of existing networks, such as the European Microfinance Network, the Microfinance Centre and the European Microfinance Platform.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Commission to clarify the multidimensional indicators it intends to use to assess the socio-economic impact of the pilot projects set up to identify best practices and appropriate methods for micro-loans, and also to clarify the performance indicators for its new technical assistance project, Jasmine;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to promote micro-credit among cooperatives and workers without job security and on non-standard contracts.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that the concept of micro-credit, developed by the Nobel prize winner Mr Muhammad Yunus, is extremely successful in creating economic and social advancements in developing countries; believes that
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes that to a large extent micro credit users are women making for loyal and reliable customers with high pay-back rates;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. However, emphasises that micro- credit should be complementary to, and not a replacement for, existing public social safety nets, and micro-credit programmes should not be used as an excuse to cut public social welfare programmes;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Takes the view that, alongside the Commission's proposed definition of micro-loans as loans of less than EUR 25 000, due consideration should be given to other variables taking account of the fact that the same nominal amount does not have the same value in all Member States;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that 91.5% of EU enterprises are micro-enterprises (enterprises with less than ten employees) and that the greatest barrier to more innovation for those
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that 91.5% of EU enterprises are micro-enterprises (enterprises with less than ten employees) and that the greatest barrier to more innovation for those enterprises results from restricted access to credit, especially small loans (under EUR 25.000); believes therefore, that the Commission's proposal for a micro-credit initiative
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission, in view of the fact that potential micro-credit customers are normally unable to provide security and banks are generally unwilling to lend them money, to establish a 'European guarantee' for micro-loans, making available the necessary means to provide the banks with the security they require, with the 'European guarantee' being provided only if appropriate social criteria and equal opportunities principles are satisfied;
source: PE-415.182
2008/11/13
FEMM
16 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas self-employment through micro
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to link micro-credit schemes and schemes to improve competitiveness, particularly for undertakings run by women and young people, placing the emphasis on their equipment and the use of new information and communication technologies;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to raise awareness of the potentials of micro-credits through publicity and awareness-raising programmes targeted, among others, at
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to raise awareness of the potentials of micro-credits through publicity and awareness-raising
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to raise awareness of the potentials of micro-credits through publicity and awareness-raising programmes targeted, among others, at young women, ethnic minorities and
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to standardise the statistical presentation of micro-credits, including the
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls for programmes offering guarantees in cases when the collateral provided by the borrower is not considered sufficient, in particular where the beneficiary is a woman affected by or at risk of social exclusion or poverty;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Asks the Commission and Member States to support former successful women beneficiaries of micro-credit in setting up financial cooperatives in order to offer micro-credits to other women.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas self-employment through micro and small businesses gives women the opportunity to improve their status in economic and social terms and the possibility to combine professional and family life,
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas the provision of micro-credits is an important tool to improve the status
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas the provision of micro-credits is an important tool to improve the status of women, especially those excluded from the formal economy, giving women a start- up possibility, encouraging female entrepreneurship, access to the market, helping them to become economically independent and is therefore not only an issue of entrepreneurship and economic growth but also of social inclusion and a measure against poverty,
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas the provision of micro-credits
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas micro-credits offer women the chance for social development, thus changing gender relationships,
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Recital C b (new) Cb. whereas one of the direct consequences of granting micro-credits to poor women is investment in their children’s education, thus giving the next generations the opportunity to live a better life,
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses, in particular, the importance of publicising the possibilities of micro- credits through the education process and their use by bodies or non-governmental women's organisation that work to link up graduates and school-leavers at all levels with the labour market;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to pay special attention to women in the current financial and economic crisis since they are a vulnerable group and therefore sensitive to loss of employment and income;
source: PE-415.296
2008/11/18
ECON
43 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the Commission
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas a range of providers can offer microcredit or facilitate access to finance, such as informal financial services providers, member-owned organisations, non-governmental organisations, guarantee funds and savings and commercial banks, and whereas cooperation between non-bank micro- finance institutions (MFIs) and commercial banks could be beneficial,
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas a range of providers can offer microcredit, such as informal financial services providers (authorised p2p lending), member-owned organisations (for example credit unions), non- governmental organisations
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. whereas there is a need to recognise the unique structure of financial services providers existing across the EU such as credit unions which are non-bank financial institutions mobilising members' deposits for micro-lending and these unique structures should not a priori exclude them from relevant micro-credit funding programmes.
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas the current financial crisis demonstrates the disadvantages of complex financial products
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas the current financial crisis demonstrates the disadvantages of complex financial products and the need for considering ways of enhancing efficiency when facing reduced access to capital due to liquidity crunch and, at the same time, underlines the importance of institutions that focus their business on local development,
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas the current financial crisis demonstrates the disadvantages of government intervention in lending to credit-challenged individuals and the lack of transparency of some complex financial products and, at the same time, underlines the importance of institutions that focus their business on local development,
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas the current financial crisis demonstrates the disadvantages of complex financial products and, at the same time, underlines the importance of institutions that focus their business on local development, and that have a strong local connection and locally-based banking services,
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) Ia. whereas it is important to stress, that consumer financial education and responsible lending should be an important part of the policies of all MFIs,
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L a (new) La. whereas in a not insignificant number of cases those willing to access funds under the EU's cohesion policy in order to set up small family businesses, might face difficulties in providing the required co- financing,
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the Commission has not
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O O. whereas several EU initiatives that entail elements of support for microcredit exist, and
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O O. whereas several EU initiatives that entail elements of support for microcredit exist, and
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O a (new) Oa. whereas, during periods of economic crisis, microcredit is potentially a useful means of taking action with a view to countering growing unemployment, provided that it can be combined with the retention of social security entitlements (unemployment benefits, income support, etc.),
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital S S. whereas the role of intermediaries should be looked into with a view to preventing abuses, as well as considering alternative ways of establishing credibility with borrowers (for example, peer support groups),
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital T T. whereas an EU framework for non-bank MFIs should be established, and the Commission should develop the mechanism for the support of microcredit which remains neutral among these microcredit providers,
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recommendation 1 – point d Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recommendation 1 – point d (d) The Commission should invite Member States to restrict the application of interest rate caps to consumer loans; however Member States should be able to apply a mechanism by which extraordinary high interest rates can be excluded.
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recommendation 1 – point d a (new) (da) The Commission should analyse - in the light of the last sub-prime crisis - the advantages and disadvantages of direct microcredit formats as against securitised credit facilities.
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recommendation 2 – point a – introductory part (a) The (co-)financing of the following projects subject to such financing being specifically targeted at promoting the availability of microcredit for
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas in 2008, for the second successive year, the European Parliament approved the incorporation in the budget of a heading entitled ‘Promoting a more favourable environment for microcredit in the EU’, and whereas these appropriations might usefully be earmarked for the formation of own capital; whereas it is regrettable that the Commission communication makes no reference to this,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recommendation 2 – point a - introductory part (a) The (co-)financing of the following projects subject to such financing being specifically targeted at promoting the availability of microcredit for disadvantaged target groups as defined by Member States for their jurisdiction (such as the Roma society, immigrants, people living in deprived rural areas, people with precarious work situations and women):
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recommendation 2 – point a - point i (i) the provision by national or European funds of guarantees for providers of microcredit;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recommendation 2 – point a - point ii (ii) the provision of business support services as additional services for microcredit borrowers, either by the providers of microcredit or by third parties, which is to include mandatory targeted training with
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recommendation 2 – point a - point iii a (new) Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recommendation 2 – point b - point ii (ii) (co-)finance projects
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recommendation 3 – title and introductory part 3. Recommendation 3 on a harmonised EU framework for
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recommendation 3 – title and introductory part 3. Recommendation 3 on a harmonised EU framework for bank and non-bank MFIs The European Parliament considers that the legislative act to be adopted should aim to regulate the following: The Commission should propose legislation to provide an EU-wide framework for bank and nonbank MFIs. The elements of
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recommendation 3 – point a (a) a
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recommendation 3 – point b (b)
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recommendation 3 – point c (c)
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas in 2008, for the second successive year, the European Parliament approved appropriations to fund a pilot project entitled ‘Promoting a more favourable environment for microcredit in Europe’, and whereas, given that the Commission communication fails to mention this aspect, these appropriations might usefully be earmarked for the formation of own capital which can serve as start-up capital,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recommendation 3 – point c (c) the
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Recommendation 3 – point d Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Recommendation 5 – point a (a) The Commission should
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Recommendation 5 – point b (b) The Commission should specify in legislation that the role of
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas several features distinguish microcredit from ordinary credit,
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas several features distinguish microcredit from ordinary credit, including credit for small and medium-sized enterprises, and whereas businesses seeking ordinary credit are generally served by
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the business of microcredit has innovative and subjective elements, such as alternative or
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas microcredits are by definition small but the possibility of 'recycling' them (granting as further such loan after repayment) due to their generally short maturity multiplies their impact, without disregarding the objective of reintegrating the recipients into the traditional banking system,
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas a range of providers can offer microcredit, such as informal financial
source: PE-415.336
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|