Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | INTA | KARIM Sajjad ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | DEVE | KACZMAREK Filip ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | AFET | TANNOCK Timothy Charles Ayrton ( PPE-DE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4Events
The European Parliament adopted by 326 votes to 226, with 3 abstentions, a resolution on an EU-India Free Trade Agreement (FTA).
The text adopted in plenary had been tabled by the EPP-ED, ALDE and UEN groups, pursuant to Article 45(2) of the Parliament’s Rules of Procedure, in the form of a proposal for a resolution to replace the proposal for a resolution contained in the own-initiative report tabled by the Committee on International Trade.
The resolution recalls that, as stated in the 2007/2008 United Nations Development Programme's (UNDP) Human Development Report, India ranks 128 on the Human Development Index (out of 177 countries), 35% of the Indian population lives on less than USD 1 a day and 80% on less than USD 2 a day. India also has one of the highest incidences of child labour. In light of these observations, the Parliament believes that the FTA should be balanced and compatible with WTO rules and obligations, pointing to the future potential for an increase in EU-India trade and investment and business opportunities. However, the FTA should also ensure that increasing bilateral trade brings benefits to the widest number of people and contributes to India's achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), including preventing environmental degradation. The agreement must also include an ambitious sustainable development chapter and be subject to the standard dispute settlement mechanism.
The Parliament considers the EU-India FTA overall as a win-win scenario. However, the plenary recommends that an evaluation be carried out of the existing sector-specificities. It also encourages the parties to address the potential disadvantages of the FTA and the ways in which human development and gender equality may be adversely affected by the rapid opening of markets.
Reiterating its view that the FTA should be presented to Parliament for its assent, the Parliament makes a number of observations on the other main points of the agreement:
Trade in goods : the Parliament notes that, at the existing average growth rate, bilateral trade is expected to exceed EUR 70.7 billion by 2010 and EUR 160.6 billion by 2015. Therefore, all efforts must be made to promote trade. That is why the Parliament calls for the FTA to include provisions aimed at reducing technical barriers to trade . It calls, in particular, for measures in the Sanitary and Phytosanitary domain (including animal welfare). The Commission is also called upon to provide technical assistance to support Indian producers in their efforts to reach EU standards, in particular concerning the health, environmental and social dimensions of production.
The Parliament stresses that the FTA includes a binding state-to-state dispute settlement mechanism, provisions on mediation on non-tariff barriers to trade (NTBs), on anti-dumping and countervailing duty measures.
Trade in services, establishment : the Parliament stresses that service liberalisation must in no way hinder the right to regulate services , including public services. It notes that trade in services between the European Union and India is relatively unbalanced; the EU exports 1.5% of its services to India, while India exports 9.2% of its total exports to the European Union.
The Parliament also notes that India is the fifth largest telecom services market in the world (and the telecom market has grown at about 25% per year over the last 5 years) and therefore calls for a relaxation of the licensing restrictions on service providers for the removal of policy uncertainty on tariff and interconnect regimes. Moreover, the plenary considers that the telecom and IT sectors are major drivers of the Indian economy and that these sectors offer enormous opportunities. The Parliament also calls for measures in the satellite sector. Moreover, in order to promote trade, MEPs request from India a more open approach in granting visas to citizens and business professionals and politicians from the EU Member States with multiple entries and minimum one year duration.
Other liberalisation measures are called for, including the accreditation of qualifications (the Parliament stresses that EU-wide accreditation of professional qualifications and agreements on mutual recognition and licensing requirements could be easily covered by the FTA) and also in terms of legal services. Moreover, the Parliament encourages India to gradually liberalise the banking and insurance sectors.
Investment : the Parliament calls on the Commission to incorporate a chapter on investment in the FTA, which could make provision for a system of a single point of information for investors. It calls on the Commission to incorporate in the FTA a chapter on investment, being a significant part thereof, thereby promoting and protecting investment deals while exploring immediate opportunities. It also calls on EU-based transnational companies with production facilities in India to abide by core ILO standards , as well as social and environmental covenants.
Recognising that FTA investment chapters have often come accompanied by commitments to liberalise capital movements and renounce capital controls, the Parliament calls on the Commission to refrain from including such clauses, given the importance of capital controls – especially for developing countries - to mitigate against the impact of the financial crisis.
Public procurement and competition : the Parliament regrets that India is not willing to include public procurement in the FTA and calls on the Commission to negotiate effective and transparent procurement systems. It also calls on India to apply transparent and fair procedures when awarding public contracts and to grant access to public procurement systems for European businesses. Moreover, the plenary believes that the European Union should incorporate Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty in the FTA so as to secure commitments on competition policy.
Intellectual property rights and industrial and commercial policy : stressing that India is one of the major sources of counterfeit medicines seized by the customs services of the Member States (accounting for 30% of the total), the Parliament calls on the Commission and the Indian authorities concerned to coordinate actions to address effectively the fight against counterfeiting and, in particular, against counterfeit medicines . It calls on the European Union and India to ensure that commitments under the FTA do not preclude access to essential medicines whilst India is developing its capacity from a generic to a research based industry. Other initiatives have been proposed, such as prize funds and patent pools in order to support access to and innovation in medicines, particularly for neglected diseases.
Trade and sustainable development : the Parliament calls for the inclusion of a substantial development chapter. The EU and India should ensure, in particular, that trade and FDI are not encouraged at the cost of lowering either environmental standards or core labour, occupational health and safety legislation and standards. Once again, the Parliament calls for the ratification and effective application of the basic conventions of the ILO. It welcomes, in particular, the introduction of a new Indian child labour law which bans children under the age of 14 from working as domestic servants or on food stalls. The EU should also press the Indian government to tackle the issue of bonded labour, which affects millions of people - largely from the Dalit and Adivasi community (indigenous tribes and peoples) - in India. The plenary also recalls that human rights and democracy clauses constitute an essential element of the FTA .
Other considerations : the Parliament welcomes the commitments made by the European Union and India to cooperate in civil nuclear research. It notes, however, that India is not a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and therefore calls on India to sign the NPT. Moreover, the Parliament calls for:
a comprehensive strategy to tackle rising global commodity prices; the strengthening of initiatives taken as part of the health-related MDGs concerning such matters as infant mortality, maternal health, child malnutrition and reducing malaria, tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS; new measures in relation to the strengthening of SMEs and in terms of microcredit.
The Committee on International Trade adopted the report drawn up by Sajjad KARIM (EPP-ED, UK) on an EU-India Free Trade Agreement (FTA).
MEPs recall that, as stated in the 2007/2008 United Nations Development Programme's (UNDP) Human Development Report, India ranks 128 on the Human Development Index (out of 177 countries), 35% of the Indian population lives on less than USD 1 a day and 80% on less than USD 2 a day. India also has one of the highest incidences of child labour.
In light of these observations, MEPs believe that the FTA should be balanced and compatible with WTO rules and obligations. They recall that the EU-India Strategic Partnership is based on common principles and shared values, as reflected in the 1994 EC-India Cooperation Agreement and consider that the new competitiveness-driven FTA should complement the 1994 Cooperation Agreement.
Based on the complementarities of both economies, MEPs point to the future potential for an increase in EU-India trade and investment and business opportunities arising from the FTA. They consider the EU-India FTA overall as a win-win scenario but recommend that an evaluation be carried out of the existing sector-specificities.
According to MEPs, the FTA should ensure that increasing bilateral trade brings benefits to the widest number of people and contributes to India’s achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The agreement should also include an ambitious sustainable development chapter and be subject to the standard dispute settlement mechanism.
Reiterating their view that the FTA should be presented to Parliament for its assent, MEPs make a number of observations on the other main points of the agreement:
Trade in goods : according to MEPs, the FTA should include provisions aimed at reducing technical barriers to trade. They call, in particular, for measures in the Sanitary and Phytosanitary domain (including animal welfare). The Commission is also called upon to provide technical assistance to support Indian producers in their efforts to reach EU standards, in particular concerning the health, environmental and social dimensions of production. Moreover, MEPs call for priority to be given to tariff reductions on Fairtrade and sustainable products .
Trade in services, establishment : according to MEPs, service liberalisation must in no way hinder the right to regulate services , and especially to maintain and develop strong public services, an essential element for development, social justice and democracy. MEPs encourage India to develop appropriate data protection legislation. They also note that India is the fifth largest telecom services market in the world and that the telecom market has grown at about 25% per year over the last 5 years. They therefore call for a relaxation of the licensing restrictions on service providers for the removal of policy uncertainty on tariff and interconnect regimes. They also call for measures in the satellite sector. Moreover, in order to promote trade, MEPs request from India a more open approach in granting visas to citizens and business professionals and politicians from the EU Member States with multiple entries and minimum one year duration.
Investment : MEPs call on the Commission to incorporate a chapter on investment in the FTA, which could make provision for a system of a single point of information for investors. They also call on EU-based transnational companies with production facilities in India to abide by core ILO standards , as well as social and environmental covenants. Recognising that FTA investment chapters have often come accompanied by commitments to liberalise capital movements and renounce capital controls, MEPs call on the Commission to refrain from including such clauses, given the importance of capital controls – especially for developing countries - to mitigate against the impact of the financial crisis.
Intellectual property rights and industrial and commercial policy : MEPs call on the Commission and the Indian authorities concerned to coordinate actions to address effectively the fight against counterfeiting and, in particular, against counterfeit medicines. They call on the European Union and India to ensure that commitments under the FTA do not preclude access to essential medicines whilst India is developing its capacity from a generic to a research based industry. Other initiatives have been proposed, such as prize funds and patent pools in order to support access to and innovation in medicines, particularly for neglected diseases.
Trade and sustainable development : MEPs call for the inclusion of a substantial development chapter. The EU and India should ensure, in particular, that trade and FDI are not encouraged at the cost of lowering either environmental standards or core labour, occupational health and safety legislation and standards. Once again, MEPs call for the ratification and effective application of the basic conventions of the ILO. They welcome, in particular, the introduction of a new Indian child labour law which bans children under the age of 14 from working as domestic servants or on food stalls. The EU should also press the Indian government to tackle the issue of bonded labour, which affects millions of people - largely from the Dalit and Adivasi community - in India.
Other considerations : MEPs express concern about rising global commodity prices and their effect on the poorest populations, including in India. They therefore call on the EU and India to coordinate a comprehensive strategy to tackle this issue in an integrated manner. Moreover, MEPs welcome the fact that India has made considerable progress towards universal primary education, improving poverty eradication and increasing access to safe drinking water. They note, however, that India is still off track on most of the health-related MDGs, such as infant mortality, maternal health, child malnutrition and reducing malaria, tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS. MEPs also call for measures in relation to the strengthening of SMEs and in terms of microcredit, which has already been introduced in the country.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)3245
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0189/2009
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0131/2009
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0131/2009
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE419.842
- Committee draft report: PE409.788
- Committee opinion: PE414.227
- Committee opinion: PE406.165
- Committee opinion: PE406.165
- Committee opinion: PE414.227
- Committee draft report: PE409.788
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE419.842
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0131/2009
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)3245
Activities
- Luigi COCILOVO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Kader ARIF
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Syed KAMALL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bogusław ROGALSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
173 |
2008/2135(INI)
2008/11/11
DEVE
16 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Urges the EU and India to renew their efforts to bring about a comprehensive trade deal that would benefit not only the EU and India but also the wider international community through multilateralism;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls for EU-India cooperation in the area of employment and social policy to be focused on the problems of labour discrimination against women, forced labour and child labour - given the fact that India has one of the largest numbers of
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Urges the Commission to insist, in the negotiations on a Free Trade Agreement, on a chapter on sustainable development establishing legally binding and enforceable minimum social and environmental standards;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Underscores that the EU should press the Indian government to tackle the issue of bonded labour, which affects millions of people - largely from the Dalit and Adivasi community - in India. It is believed that this issue is not being adequately addressed due to a lack of administrative and political will;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Stresses the need for diversity of energy supply and for a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions as part of a sustainable development approach;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Urges the EU to promote greater corporate responsibility among
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Urges the EU to include a provision in its FTA with India which ensures that EU companies making use of Special Economic Zones cannot be exempted from respecting fundamental labour rights or other labour rights based on ILO Conventions that have been ratified by India;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Urges the EU to make sure that any investment or other form of economic activity that adversely affects the livelihood of rural communities within domestic and foreign companies based in India and urban groups is combined with adequate compensation and rehabilitation with the full participation and consent of the affected groups.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that the EU and India committed themselves to strengthening their consultations in the United Nations Human Rights Council and sustaining their dialogue with a view to promoting the universality of human rights at the ninth India-EU Summit on 29 September 2008, as reflected in the published Joint Action Plan
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that the EU and India committed themselves to strengthening their consultations in the United Nations Human Rights Council and sustaining their dialogue with a view to promoting the universality of human rights at the ninth India-EU Summit on 29 September 2008, as reflected in the published Joint Action Plan; underlines the importance of not separating the developing trade relations between the EU and India from human rights reforms in India, and commends its expansion to include research and cooperation in the areas of decent work, sustainable development and climate change;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the EU and the Indian Government to tackle India’s food security problem by encouraging its domestic food production through the use and development of environmentally sound and sustainable methods, available structures and resources – such as seeds, manure and means of production and promoting food production through the use of particular biodiversity;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Notes that despite sustained economic growth, vast inequalities still persist, with more than 800 million people surviving on less than $2 per day; is particularly concerned about the situation of underprivileged sections of the population, in particular women, children,
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses that increasing environmental destruction in India is a constantly growing problem with unimaginable economic, social and environmental consequences, particularly for the large number of Indians living in poverty, and thus stresses the particular need for continued EU cooperation with India in this field;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Considers that the EU must pay special attention to the SME sector in India, and therefore suggests that in all development cooperation programmes between the EU and India, SMEs could be strengthened through measures to help finance market-driven local projects proposed by citizens;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls for EU-India cooperation in the area of employment and social policy to be focused on the problems of
source: PE-415.223
2008/11/13
AFET
17 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the existence of an annual
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the existence of an annual local-level EU-India human rights dialogue but is concerned about the slow pace at which India is implementing ILO labour standards, particularly in connection with child and bonded labour; calls on India to do more to improve the treatment of women, and to deal with the issue of the death penalty and the persecution of and discrimination against religious minorities;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Is concerned about the ongoing persecutions and murders of Christians in India; calls on the EU to tackle this issue in the human rights dialogue;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Requests that the Council make urgent progress on extending the blue card visa system to Indian nationals;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to give
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Points out that, if economic cooperation between the EU and India is based on the Union's system of universal values, it may become a reference model for cooperation with other countries.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes that effective cooperation does not only involve stronger economic relations but also common democratic values and respect for fundamental freedoms;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Strongly supports closer ties between the EU and India; encourages the Indian authorities, therefore, to engage in negotiations on a partnership and cooperation agreement with the EU as a sign of further upgrading and deepening the relationship; believes that the conclusion of such an agreement would improve the quality of the partnership, and invites both sides to engage in the negotiations as equal partners;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Recognises that India plays a major role in conflict prevention and peacekeeping in its neighbourhood and beyond; is concerned by the current volatile political situation in Pakistan and the increasingly insecure situation in Afghanistan and Sri Lanka and expresses the hope that India, as predominant country in the region, will act as a promoter of stability and peace; would like India and the EU, particularly through the intermediary of the EU Special Envoy for Burma/Myanmar, to work together to prevail upon the Burmese military junta to release political prisoners and respect human rights and to study together all the options for moving from dictatorship to democracy;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes the rapid rise in inflation in India; recognises that, in order for India to remain competitive
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes the India-US civil nuclear partnership agreement and the Nuclear Suppliers Group waiver, which enables other nations to cooperate with India on nuclear issues and opens the way for EU firms to compete in India's nuclear energy market;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes the India-US civil nuclear partnership agreement and the Nuclear Suppliers Group waiver, which enables other nations to cooperate with India on nuclear issues and opens the way for EU firms to compete in India's nuclear energy market;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 source: PE-415.160
2009/02/03
INTA
140 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 21 a (new) - having regard to the Commission’s report on the 2007 Customs seizures of counterfeit goods at the EU's external border published on 19 May 2008,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas as stated in the 2007/8 UNDP Human Development Report, India ranks 128 on the Human Development Index(out of 177 countries), 35% of the Indian population lives on 1$/day and 80% on less than $2/day; whereas India ranks 62nd on the human poverty index for developing countries among 108 developing countries for which the index has been calculated; and whereas India has one of the highest incidences of child labour,
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Requests from India a more open approach in granting visas to citizens and business professionals and politicians from the European Union with multiple entries and minimum one year duration;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a.Recalls that investments need to be accompanied by well-designed rules and regulations; reaffirms in this context its resolution of 13 March 2007 on corporate social responsibility (2006/2133(INI)) and asks the Commission to make sure that EU-based transnational companies with production facilities in India abide by core ILO standards, social and environmental covenants and international agreements to achieve a worldwide balance between economic growth and higher social and environmental standards;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 b (new) 21b. Recognises that FTA investment chapters have often come accompanied with commitments to liberalise capital movements and renounce capital controls; asks the Commission to refrain from including such clauses, given the importance of capital controls – especially for developing countries - to mitigate against the impact of the financial crisis;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Calls on the Commission to incorporate
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Welcomes the establishment of
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Recalls that in order for investment to be beneficial it needs to be accompanied by well-designed rules and regulations; therefore calls on the Commission to advocate rules for transnational companies in the agreement to make sure investors respect core ILO standards, social and environmental covenants and international agreements to achieve a balance between economic growth and higher social and environmental standards;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 b (new) 23b. Recalls that while FTA investment chapters have often come accompanied with commitments to liberalise capital movements and renounce capital controls, such clauses should be approached with extreme caution, given the importance of capital controls – especially for developing countries - to mitigate against the impact of the financial crisis;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24.
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Regrets that India is not willing to include public procurement in the FTA; calls on the Commission to negotiate effective and transparent procurement systems; calls on India to apply transparent and fair procedures when awarding public contracts and to grant access to public procurement systems for Community undertakings that are established in India and operate there;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24.
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas economic imbalances between India's States, and therefore an unbalanced distribution of wealth and national income require the adoption of sound complementary economic policies, including tax harmonisation and focusing capacity building efforts on the poorest States, enabling them to use funds,
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24.
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Regrets that India is not willing to include public procurement in the FTA; given its significance, calls on the Commission to negotiate
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Encourages the implementation of the new Indian competition law; believes that the European Union should incorporate Art 81 and 82 of the Treaty in the FTA to secure commitments on competition policy that would do away with private barriers to entry for importers;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25.
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Welcomes India's commitment to a strong IPR regime
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Welcomes India's commitment to a strong IPR regime
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Welcomes India's commitment to a strong IPR regime; encourages its rigorous implementation and enforcement; calls on the Commission and the Indian authorities concerned to coordinate actions to address effectively the fight against counterfeiting and, in particular, against counterfeit medicines;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Welcomes
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26.
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas India is the single largest beneficiary of the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) scheme; whereas the European Union's preferential imports from India reached a value of €11,3 bn in 2007 compared to € 9,7 bn in 2006,
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Welcomes India
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27.
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Calls on the European Union and India to ensure that TRIPS does not preclude to ensure that commitments under the access to essential medicines whilst FTA do not preclude access to essential India is developing its capacity from a medicines whilst India is developing its generic to a research based industry; capacity from a generic to a research based industry;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28.
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Regrets the Indian Patent Amendment Act does not contain any provisions on data
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Calls on the European Union and India to jointly fund and support measures and initiatives such as prize funds, patent pools and other alternative mechanisms, in order to support access to and innovation in medicines, particularly for neglected diseases;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Calls on the European Union and India to jointly fund and support measures and initiatives such as prize funds, patent pools and other alternative mechanisms that ensure innovation in medicine, relevant to neglected diseases and to ensure access to medicines;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Calls on the European Union and India
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Asks for the ratification and effective application of the basic conventions of the International Labour Organisation (ILO);
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas both parties reaffirm their respective commitments for tariff reductions, progressive reciprocal liberalisation of establishment and trade in services; and whereas
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Is concerned about child labour in India, very often exploited in unsafe and unhealthy conditions; asks the Commission to address the issue during the negotiations on the FTA and asks the Indian government to maximise its efforts to remove the underlying causes in order to end this phenomenon;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Recognises that a substantial development chapter is an essential part of any FTA and subject to the standard dispute mechanism;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 b (new) 29b. A mechanism should be established whereby recognised workers' and employers' organisations should be able to submit requests for action, which would be treated within a specified time period, and which could result in ongoing follow- up and review provisions, in order to maintain pressure against violations of workers' rights;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Stresses that human rights and democracy clauses constitute an essential element of the FTA; is concerned by the continuing persecution of religious minorities and human rights defenders in India and
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Stresses that human rights and democracy clauses constitute an essential element of the FTA;
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Stresses that human rights and democracy clauses constitute an essential element of the FTA; is concerned by the continuing persecution of religious minorities and human rights defenders in India and extrajudicial killings and unmarked mass graves in the Indian Administrated Kashmir; calls on the Indian Government to grant access for the UN Special Rapporteurs to investigate these mass graves; also in the spirit of the human rights and democracy clause, calls on the Commission and the Council to work together with the Indian Government to improve the situation of the underprivileged sections of the population, in particular women, children and disadvantaged groups of persons, e.g. Dalits and Adivasis; stresses in this context that the caste system constitutes a human rights violation in itself;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Calls on
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31.
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 a (new) 32a. Stresses that states with complex societies and economies, which move more and more from bilateral trade agreements to more sophisticated bilateral trade relations must ensure a stable and secure environment in general; is concerned about the lack of security in India; calls on India to take the various minor and severe attacks from various political groups more seriously;
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 a (new) 34a. Asks the Council and the Commission to confirm India's commitment to negotiating an EU-Trade FTA with the incoming Indian Government post forthcoming General Election;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas both parties reaffirm their commitment for tariff reductions,
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 b (new) 34b. Asks that during the next round of negotiations the Commission raises with the Indian authorities the continuing illegal trade in tiger skins with Tibet that threatens the extinction of the Indian tiger;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas both parties reaffirm their commitment for tariff reductions, progressive reciprocal liberalisation of establishment and trade in services;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas market access
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas market access
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas market access is being hampered by Non-tariff Barriers to Trade (NTBs) such as health and safety requirements or technical barriers, quantitative restrictions, conformity procedures, trade defence mechanisms, customs procedures, internal taxation, and a failure to adopt international norms and standards in all areas,
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas even more account should be duly taken of the elements on recognition, suitable and effective protection, implementation and enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs),
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 34 a (new) - having regard to the painfully slow progress of negotiations with the Indian Authorities as compared to the Republic of Korea and even ASEAN,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas account should be duly taken of the elements on recognition, suitable and effective protection, implementation and enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs), including patents, trade or service marks, copyright and similar rights, geographical indications (including marks of origin), industrial design and integrated circuit topography,
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K a (new) Ka. whereas India is one of the major sources of counterfeit medicines seized by the customs services of the Member States (accounting for 30% of the total); whereas substandard and counterfeit medicines favour drug resistance, and increase morbidity and mortality,
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas according to the 2008 Global Hunger Index, India ranks 66 out of 88 nations (developing countries and countries in transition); and whereas the India Hunger Index found that not a single State in India falls in the "low hunger" or "moderate hunger" categories; twelve States fall in the "alarming" category; and four States - Punjab, Kerala, Haryana and Assam - fall in the "serious" category,
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas the FTA should include
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas the FTA should include binding and enforceable commitments on social and environmental standards and sustainable development,
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O O. whereas studies s
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital P Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q Q. whereas a Horizontal Aviation Agreement
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the European Union should continue to give priority to a rule-based multilateral trading system, established through the WTO, which offers the best prospects for fair and equitable international trade by establishing appropriate rules and ensuring compliance with them,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Believes that the FTA should be comprehensive, balanced and compatible with and complementary to the WTO rules and obligations;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Believes that the FTA should be comprehensive, compatible with and complementary to the WTO rules and obligations; the DDA remains
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Believes that the FTA should be comp
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Believes that
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Is very concerned by the lack of transparency and democracy in this process of negotiation; considers that the text of the negotiations should be made public, and a transparent, accountable and consultative negotiation process should be adopted before continuing any negotiation;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the EU-India Strategic
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the outcome of the 9th EU- India Summit and the revised Joint Action Plan; recalls the pledge of the European Union and India to accelerate FTA talks; is
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the outcome of the 9th EU- India Summit and the revised Joint Action Plan; recalls the pledge of the European Union and India to accelerate FTA talks;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the outcome of the 9th EU- India Summit and the revised Joint Action Plan; recalls the pledge of the European Union and India to accelerate FTA talks;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the outcome of the 9th EU-
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas a successful and balanced conclusion of the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) is of crucial importance to both the European Union and India; an
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Points to the future potential for an increase in EU-India trade and investment;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Points to the future potential for an increase in EU-India trade and investment; considers the EU- India FTA overall as a
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Points to the future potential for an
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Encourages the parties also to address the potential disadvantages of the FTA and the ways in which human development and gender equality may be adversely affected by the rapid opening of markets; recognises the right of governments to maintain necessary 'policy space' and regulatory capacities to shape economic and social policies that serve their most vulnerable people, including trade measures to protect weak economic actors;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recognises the right of governments to maintain necessary 'policy space' and regulatory capacities to shape economic and social policies that serve their most vulnerable people, including trade measures to protect weak economic actors;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Stresses that an agreement should include a continued monitoring and comprehensive review system, in order to determine the socio-economic impact of the agreement; calls for provisions of the agreement to be adjusted in line with the conclusions of this review;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Underlines the necessity of a transparent negotiations process; calls therefore on the Commission to publish negotiation documents and to consult with the Parliament and civil society during the negotiating process;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Stresses that an agreement should include a continued monitoring and comprehensive review system, in order to observe the socio-economic impact of the agreement, including the costs and consequences of implementation and, if necessary, to amend provisions of the agreement and to adjust their application;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Asks the Commission to include an ambitious sustainable development chapter as an essential part of the agreement and subject to the standard dispute settlement mechanism;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) is of crucial importance to both the European Union and India
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Regrets that India maintains its position as regards the principle of asymmetry; urges the Commission to push for a reciprocal
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes India's decreased average applied tariffs;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes India's decreased average applied tariffs; stresses that these levels remain a genuine problem for European industry; calls on India to bind its imports tariffs at levels closer to its applied rates within the context of the DDA and to make further efforts in removing part of the existing non tariff barriers;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes India's decreased average applied tariffs;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes that India's
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas political relations with India are based on the 2004 Strategic Partnership, on the 2005 Joint Action Plan adopted at the EU-India Summit in September 2005 and revised at the 9th EU-India Summit in Marseille and on the 1994 Cooperation Agreement; whereas the FTA should build and expand upon the cooperation already foreseen in Article 24 of the Cooperation Agreement,
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers it important that the FTA confirms the provisions of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade and the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement; calls on the Commission in this regard to address outstanding issues such as animal welfare;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes that India is concerned about the lack of harmonisation of micro-biological standards in the EU, implications of REACH, costly certificates
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes that India is concerned about the lack of harmonisation of micro-biological standards in the EU, implications of REACH, costly certificates and conformity procedures
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes that India is concerned about
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes that India is concerned about the lack of harmonisation of micro-biological standards in the EU, implications of REACH, costly certificates and conformity procedures; stresses that these issues must be resolved in the FTA; calls on both parties to ensure that regulation and NTBs
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Acknowledges that India's standards regime is still evolving; calls on the Bureau of Indian Standards to raise its standards in line with international standards and to increase transparency by improving its testing and certification procedures; is concerned about the implementation and monitoring of Sanitary & Phytosanitary measures and standards;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Acknowledges that India's standards regime is still evolving; calls on the Bureau of Indian Standards and the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) to raise its standards in line with international standards and to increase transparency by improving its testing and certification procedures; calls on the Commission to provide adequate support to strengthen capacity and qualified human resources within Indian regulatory bodies;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Acknowledges that India's standards regime is still evolving; calls on the Bureau of Indian Standards to raise its standards in line with international standards and to increase transparency in the formulation of standards, by improving its testing and certification procedures;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Acknowledges that India's standards regime is still evolving; calls on the Bureau of Indian Standards to raise its standards
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas, the European Union is India's largest source of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), with €10,9 billion invested in 2007; and the European Union accounted for 65% of all FDI flows into India in 2007; and whereas India's FDI into the European Union increased from €0,5 billion in 2006 to €9,5 billion in 2007,
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Stresses that the FTA includes a binding state-to-state dispute settlement mechanism, provisions on mediation on NTBs, on Anti-dumping and countervailing duty measures and a general exception clause based on Article XX and XXI of GATT; stresses that the FTA should foster free and fair trade and lead to the eradication of protectionism;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Calls for priority to be given to tariff reductions on 'Fairtrade' and sustainable products with the appropriate amendment of EU custom codes;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 b (new) 12b. With the rising volumes of counterfeit goods arriving in the EU asks that the Indian Authorities allow EU customs inspectors to observe and monitor ships landing in Indian Ports destined for the EU;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recognises that services are the fastest growing sector of the Indian economy; notes that India has offensive interests in GATS Mode 1 and Mode 4 liberalisation; the European Union would like to complete liberalisation in market access and national treatment in Mode 3 in most services
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Points out that service liberalisation must in no way hinder the right to regulate services, and especially to maintain and develop strong public services, an essential element for development, social justice and democracy;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Notes that according to the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry bilateral trade in services is expected to exceed € 2
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Notes that trade in services between the EU and India is relatively unbalanced; the EU exports 1.5% of its services to India, while India exports 9.2% of its total exports to the EU;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Points out that in general India's services suffer from a range of horizontal barriers such as archaic laws, a multiplicity of rules and regulations, inconsistent practices across States and a multiplicity of contact points at different levels of bureaucracy, regulatory gaps, public sector bias and limits on foreign investment and ownership; stresses that the challenge for the FTA is not only to accelerate liberalisation in India's services sectors, but also to facilitate the implementation of a range of complementary reforms designed to improve the quality of regulation;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Points out that India's services suffer from a range of horizontal barriers; stresses that the challenge for the FTA is
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas India’s GDP is approximately 6% of the size of the EU’s; whereas the EU’s trade with India makes up about 2% of its total trade, while India’s trade with the EU represents approximately 20% of its overall trade and studies have predicted that under an FTA with the EU, India’s imports would increase far more significantly than its exports; whereas this scenario could increase India’s current account deficit and consequently its dependence on external financing;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Points out that India's services suffer
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Regrets the fact that India still has restrictions, on average a maximum of 49% for foreign ownership, in the distribution and security sectors;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Points out that services liberalisation must in no way hinder the right to regulate services, especially to develop and maintain strong public services;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Encourages India to develop
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Encourages India to develop appropriate data protection legislation which would enable India to achieve the status of a country with an adequate level of protection to allow transfer of personal data from the EU;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Considers that the telecom and IT sectors are major drivers of the Indian economy and that India is to be made a hub for telecom manufacturing by facilitating telecom specific Special Economic Zones (SEZs); stresses that there are enormous opportunities in the manufacturing sector; notes that India perceives high and different mobile termination rates as a hindrance to entering the single market; calls on the Commission and Member States to address this issue in the FTA;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Notes that India is gradually liberalising its banking sector; encourages India to allow more competition; recalls at the same time the importance of strong and well designed rules and regulations for financial services and control of international financial transactions;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F.
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Notes that India is gradually liberalising its banking sector; encourages India to allow more competition; recalls at the same time the importance of strong and well-designed rules and regulations for financial services and control of international financial transactions;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Notes that India is gradually liberalising its banking sector; encourages India to allow more competition notably by allowing European banks to open more branches, including in rural areas;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Encourages India to amend the proposed draft postal bill which would seriously reduce current market access opportunities for express service providers and regrets that new restrictions reducing current opportunities for self- handling for airport services will be enforced as from 1 July 2009; invites the Commission to seek full commitments from India on express services as well as on self-handling for express cargo carriers at airports with a view to safeguarding market access opportunities also in the future;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Points out that services liberalisation must in no way hinder the right to regulate services, especially to develop and maintain strong public services;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20.
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Welcomes the Indian pledge to allow foreign law firms to operate in India; calls on the Commission to
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Welcomes the Indian pledge to allow foreign law firms to operate in India as this opening will bring significant benefits for the Indian economy and legal profession, as well as for European law firms, who have expertise in international law, and for their clients; calls on the Commission to push for liberalisation of legal services in the FTA;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Encourages India to liberalise the insurance sector and increase the equity cap up to 49% minimum so as to allow the development of this important sector for the Indian economy;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21.Notes that the full ambition of the FTA cannot be achieved without commitments in Mode 4; stresses that there are huge benefits to nationwide and EU-wide accreditation of professional qualifications and agreements on mutual recognition and licensing requirements within professional services in both the EU and India, which could be easily covered by the FTA;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Notes that the full ambition of the FTA cannot be achieved without
source: PE-419.842
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE406.165&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-406165_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE414.227&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-414227_EN.html |
docs/3 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54-p4
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
TANNOCK CharlesNew
TANNOCK Timothy Charles Ayrton |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE406.165&secondRef=02New
http://nullEN&reference=PE406.165&secondRef=02 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.227&secondRef=02New
http://nullEN&reference=PE414.227&secondRef=02 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.788New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE409.788 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE419.842New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE419.842 |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0131_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0131_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090323&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20090323&type=CRE |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-131&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0131_EN.html |
docs/6/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-131&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0131_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-189New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0189_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
INTA/6/62893New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052-p2
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|